Yeah the W1 is okay. Even though it's a disappointement compared to the P1, I still think it looks kind of generic and lacks that hypercar "wow" factor that we would expect from it. I honestly even like the design of the 765 LT more to be honest
@TheCarAnarchist True, or even the AMG One, although I'd still choose the Valhalla... Looks, price AND 0 - 60 mph time!! (Valhalla 2.5 seconds, AMG One 2.9 apparently)
@Wishi13 The AMG One is kind of a paradox. In terms of pure stats and numbers it's underwhelming at the hypercar league. But if it can lap the Nurburgring in 6:29 then there is really nothing we can say lol, it's undeniable. The Jesko for example is much more impressive on paper but I doubt it would go faster. But yeah, I would still take the Valhalla over the AMG One too. Valhalla > AMG One > W1 > F80. This is the order for me
I think the W1 is alright. Looks pretty good in the black spec. Not nearly as good as the P1 though, and the Aston looks far better for less than half the money. The F80 is disgusting though. Lego RC looking ass car for $4 mill, no way anyone would buy this if it wasn’t a Ferrari. Going from the LaFerrari to this is crazy. It will probably smoke the Aston on a track, but for more than 4x the money and 1/1000th the looks
I also think the W1 is "alright". But "alright" isn't enough for a next gen hypercar that is the long awaited successor to such a modern legend like the P1. It just doesn't have that hypercar "wow" factor and excitement about it, which is the whole point. You are exactly right, Ferrari can only get away with it because they have such a powerful brand, and the F80 does indeed have that Lego look LOL
Yep, I agree, looks beautiful. The W1 is not quite so bad, but I'd still choose the Valhalla over it, and I'd save a ton of money in the process
Yeah the W1 is okay. Even though it's a disappointement compared to the P1, I still think it looks kind of generic and lacks that hypercar "wow" factor that we would expect from it. I honestly even like the design of the 765 LT more to be honest
@TheCarAnarchist True, or even the AMG One, although I'd still choose the Valhalla... Looks, price AND 0 - 60 mph time!! (Valhalla 2.5 seconds, AMG One 2.9 apparently)
@Wishi13 The AMG One is kind of a paradox. In terms of pure stats and numbers it's underwhelming at the hypercar league. But if it can lap the Nurburgring in 6:29 then there is really nothing we can say lol, it's undeniable. The Jesko for example is much more impressive on paper but I doubt it would go faster. But yeah, I would still take the Valhalla over the AMG One too. Valhalla > AMG One > W1 > F80. This is the order for me
@TheCarAnarchist
Bang On List (IMHO) !!!
Valhalla > AMG One > W1 > F80 😁
Lol are you supposed to be some sort of drug dealer with the sunnies on
I think the W1 is alright. Looks pretty good in the black spec. Not nearly as good as the P1 though, and the Aston looks far better for less than half the money. The F80 is disgusting though. Lego RC looking ass car for $4 mill, no way anyone would buy this if it wasn’t a Ferrari. Going from the LaFerrari to this is crazy. It will probably smoke the Aston on a track, but for more than 4x the money and 1/1000th the looks
I also think the W1 is "alright". But "alright" isn't enough for a next gen hypercar that is the long awaited successor to such a modern legend like the P1. It just doesn't have that hypercar "wow" factor and excitement about it, which is the whole point. You are exactly right, Ferrari can only get away with it because they have such a powerful brand, and the F80 does indeed have that Lego look LOL