.NET MAUI isn't 'better' than Uno Platform, any more than Uno is better than .NET MAUI. They both have their strengths and weaknesses and they're both awesome frameworks. Uno uses drawn controls to render WinUI on it's target platforms, if that's what you're after then awesome. It targets Linux, which .NET MAUI doesn't do. .NET MAUI on the other hand provides abstractions of native controls, so you get the same result as if you had written the app using Swift or Kotlin for example. But you can use drawn controls too; in fact there's a library in the works that lets you choose Fabric/Fluent style drawn controls on any platform so it's almost the same. Perhaps we should do another video comparing available cross-platform frameworks!
![[Encode] Da li je ETF za tebe? Info sesija](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kIRrTVfI8ec/mqdefault.jpg)
What makes maui better than uno platform?
.NET MAUI isn't 'better' than Uno Platform, any more than Uno is better than .NET MAUI. They both have their strengths and weaknesses and they're both awesome frameworks. Uno uses drawn controls to render WinUI on it's target platforms, if that's what you're after then awesome. It targets Linux, which .NET MAUI doesn't do. .NET MAUI on the other hand provides abstractions of native controls, so you get the same result as if you had written the app using Swift or Kotlin for example. But you can use drawn controls too; in fact there's a library in the works that lets you choose Fabric/Fluent style drawn controls on any platform so it's almost the same.
Perhaps we should do another video comparing available cross-platform frameworks!