this test really shows how the bmpc 12 stops of dynamic range weighs in with the bmccs 13 stops of dynamic range. The difference is extremely noticeable.
I loved this test. But now a year later I come back and say this: test the BMCC 2.5k prores and raw graded, and especially, for example, under tungsten or low CRI lighting. New conclusions pending.
I dont think you shot these images with the same fstop and iso. Because I strongly do not think there's that much difference between 12 and 13 dynamic range. So in case you state the necessary settings this video is useless...
+Özgür Akyıldız The large disparity is due to the fact that the BMPC4K does not actually have 12 usable stops of dynamic range. It is closer to 8-9 stops.
this test really shows how the bmpc 12 stops of dynamic range weighs in with the bmccs 13 stops of dynamic range. The difference is extremely noticeable.
Wow BMCC definitely better, wish they would add 50/60fps at least.
huge difference! ty for posting.
I loved this test. But now a year later I come back and say this: test the BMCC 2.5k prores and raw graded, and especially, for example, under tungsten or low CRI lighting. New conclusions pending.
I assume both cameras were EF mount? Why is the BMPC4k so underexposed? I would have thought with the larger sensor it wouldn't be that much darker...
if the bmcc is mft and uses a speedbooster the difference in exposure would make sense
Nice! wich one do you prefer? I´m worry about the rolling shutter on the BMCC....
and which has more film look to you?? Thanks!!
I dont think you shot these images with the same fstop and iso. Because I strongly do not think there's that much difference between 12 and 13 dynamic range. So in case you state the necessary settings this video is useless...
+Özgür Akyıldız The large disparity is due to the fact that the BMPC4K does not actually have 12 usable stops of dynamic range. It is closer to 8-9 stops.
@@WeebLabs That is not true. You pulled that number from your ass, so just lol at your conclusion.