Join our exclusive Discord community for elite poker enthusiasts! Tournaments, weekly events, and lively discussions. Limited spots available - be part of the elite 500! bit.ly/Poker500
Yeah not a smart move but after the raise and flopping trips the rest of his moves weren’t that surprising… isn’t that the point of raising with a hand like that… to try and get people out and hope you get a monster on the flop
Idk if you’re serious but calling with this hand to get a flop like that is why you play a hand like that. Usually your opponent will have a big overpair if they are call call calling and they are just waiting for you to flip over 9s or something.
@@xukeepax1286bad odds of course, but then those hands are also known as giant killers but in this case he got out flopped but in most cases that’s a win like almost 7:3.
yea he blows… those guys make the table great some times they run hot and get lucky on you and it stings. But those players are a dream and you just wait for the right moment to snipe them for a double up…
She wanted to win. But he started talking and getting depressed. At that point, she didn't want to destroy him completely. She felt bad because she knows the dude was going be depress. Also, most of us have been in her shoes. When we have a lot of money and feel bad when we destroy a person who makes less than us.
The #1 best lesson I have learned about poker is to just fold when i know I'm beat. He puts her on a straight, knows that he's beat, and then calls anyway. It hurts to fold when you're committed like that but it hurts worse to get stacked.
straight isn't even a likely hand considering the betting. she would have had to continued (as an overcall btw) with all combinations of a3 or 68 on a 447 rainbow flop. so straight away, a3 is gone, and then 86, to call turn as well, she would have to have two hearts or be a complete moron. with a name like "sia the bot", i'm questioning the moron status. way more likely she has 77 or filled up with 4x.
The only hand DK was beating was a weaker 4 with a 3 or 6 or bluffs. This was a case of having too much confidence in your hand. He would have been able to escape that preflop and avoided this all together.
Even great poker players sometimes pay off their opponent when they are almost certain that they are beat. Sometimes it is worth it to get information on the opponent. This isn't one of those cases.
That's not true. A good player understands that to be the case in most spots, but it's a great place to bluff because that is exactly what they will think. DO you really think she cares that much about a 12K bluff? 12K is nothing to her. Sometimes you just have to understand your opponent. People that the money means nothing to them make some crazy ass moves.
He didn't recognize that her hand could've been made from jump. He was pushing every street as the hunter, then couldn't conceive that he was being trapped the whole way.
or even pocket 5's is plausible too. I couldn't see a player with 3x my stack making a bluff in that spot Big pocket pairs would just call the value bet. So the only hands that would shove all-in are hands that would beat a 4. Player took a bad beat earlier in the session and was on tilt. If he thought it through he would have saved some money
K4 off, a monster! 😂 in all seriousness, this is why I love playing poker, its these guys who pay us off and keep the good times rolling. That was fish play of the highest order. Beautiful.
Played that exact same scenario except it was K3 of hearts and the last 3 came on the river against my nut boat 7s full. We got everything in on the turn was the worst loss in a single hand I’d ever had 10 years ago and still to this day. Ahhh memory lane
I had this exact same situation last night, I had pocket 7's, 2 fours on the board. I made a boat on the turn, which pretty much made it impossible to not lose all my chips against the quad 4's I was facing.
That’s painful. Last tourn I played pretty close to the money I shove with 8s he called with king queen off suit flop. A 8 4 two spades. turn 3 of spades river something of spades he has the queen of spades. I was mad af
Someone please explain to me how pocket 7's is "The NUTS" on that flop. It's a monster, yes. But the nuts? Did they change the rules of poker when I wasn't looking? Wouldn't pocket 4's be the nuts???
Yeah i mean she pretty much snap called every bet and went all in pretty quickly too, seemed so strong yet because of that i could see bluffs getting thru played the exact same way, even tho its risky and would take balls
The way I’m seeing it, is given DK betting 3 streets here in a multi way pot, how often would she really bluff raise all in on the river to such strength? It would have to have her at least pause to think about it. I just think it’s a crying call. Even the announcer knows it’s a fold.
@@joehenry9546 I mean i wouldve folded, i just really dont know much about these players, is she known for making risky bluff plays? If not then it makes folding an even easier choice
Am I a bad person for actually being slightly pleased seeing a fish like DK getting stacked? After having played for years and been at the wrong end of so many fishy players doing stupid stuff and winning pots, it kind of feels like justice. Also, Sia is lovely.
@@TheJbenwaa I've never seen her play any way other than NIT. If she's in to the river vs a 3-street bettor on a paired flop you KNOW she has it. He should have check folded the river.
Could have been quads over quads, so not even quad 4's is the nuts with 2 cards to come. Very hard to flop the nuts without a straight flush. I once flopped a Royal Flush at a WSOP Circuit Event, and that was flopping the nuts (my hole cards were JTs and flop was AKQs).
@@Mark-rw3kw buddy flopping the nuts on the flop means flopping the best hand on the flop, not looking at the cards that are yet to come. The nuts can change, altough yeah, 4s was the nuts here
@@GlennFrodo I prefer to reserve the word "nuts' for the best possible hand at the river, even if the river has not happened yet. It is not uncommon to have the best hand after the flop and still lose the hand. Because if someone has the best possible hand at the river, and only the flop or turn has been played, one needs to know that and needs to call it something different than just having the best hand at that point.
@@fomori2 I never wrote that it was possible given cards held by others in which a player would be unaware, only possible for that particular flop, holding a pair of fours would have been the nuts. Holding a pair of fours remains the nuts for that flop. End of.
@@IkonAndDiva690 From the perspective of the viewer 7s full is the nuts, which is what WE are. From the perspective of the players in the hand, once DK reveals his cards, the players also know 7s full is the nuts. Now, in the moment of imperfect information, aka at the time the players were playing the hand, it was POSSIBLE that quad 4's were the nuts, but then shown to be impossible through revealed information. Since you never pointed out your reference frame in your initial post, you sir are WRONG.
effective nuts because DK had a 4... sure from Sia POV DK could have had 44... but in what world does flopped quads lead betting?? Almost never, Sia had the nuts
Sia would never be playing a/3 in a pot like that and she is never bluffing the river like that either. Just gotta lay that one down every time against that player. DK was up so much that session, he just can’t help being a calling station
She was on the button. She easily could have had A3. But when she barely thought about calling his half-pot bet on the turn, the nit should have slammed on the brakes. He fell in love with his hand and was already mentally counting his stack. That he called her quick, confident all-in was laughable. He said his head was spinning - pretty sure his head is always spinning. Sure wish home games had calling stations like him.
DK should not have exposed his cards when he said "How can I fold this hand?" because he could be digging for a reaction from SIA the Bot which might have influenced his decision to fold or to go all in.
He smoked a cigarette then pawned his gold ring. Got 700. Went to play craps. 20 minutes later he was trying sell his watch. He got 250 for it and went to play roullette. I saw him next day wearing a batman costume on freemont.
I mean, it's a great bluff when no flush draws are out there, plus the overpair possibilities. But man that's a clear fold, it'd be one hell of an exploit vs a good tight player who triples off only to get raised and KNOW they need to overfold.
Sia is as tight solid a player as you get. She's not the type to make a river bluff with marginal or a missed draw like 65. She's more likely trapping a monster in position. Against alot of other players...that's a good call.
She has no bluffs, so why bluff when you have no bluffs? Unless the bluff is the bluff so that she can't be bluffing as she has no bluffs so it ain't a bluff and she ain't bluffing. Maybe it was the right play at the wrong time. And in 37 years, everyone will choose spots when they have no bluffs and bluff like fuck, and that will be standard, and to not bluff when bluffing makes zero sense, will be considered eccentric and outlandish. Who knows.
He can’t show his hand for minutes while deciding to call or not . He’s trying to see if she signals strength or weakness. That should be illegal, I’m glad he lost.
DGAF proving not only GOAT commentator status but he's actually a very acute player. Just listen 4:48 onwards. Genuinely think he would be able to find a fold in that spot. (while proving what a mediocre player Nate is) Given the context of how well Sia was running and how bad DK was running
Poker is one of the only games where its so hard to feel truly good about a huge win. Especially when playing with just friends. But it's not that much fun crushing strangers either when they have hands they just cant lay down. I mean...until they leave then i feel really good.
Well, trips with second best kicker isn't necessary the bottom of his betting range. I think you could make the case for playing like this (until the call on the reraise) even with top pair and a decent kicker (A7, K7s), so while going for value with worse 4 or a marginal overpair (88, 99) is on the greedier side, she could do that. She also has natural bluff candidates in a form of 65 and 53s. I can see calling, though I'm not sure if for a sizing that big. Against a reraise overbet, he's allowed to fold pretty much the bottom half of his range. Considering how many sets are there (77 x3 ,22 x3 ,55? x3(2?) ,74s x1,54s x2 , 42s? x1, 54o? x6(4?)), a random straight with 86s (4 combos, maybe 2 of which he'd choose in this line as semibluffs - A3 I think would not play this way) and 8 combos of A4, he has 26-31 better hands, so K4o probably doesn't make the cut.
I'm glad she won, but the title says she flopped the nuts. Maybe I'm mistaken, but if her opponent had two fours instead of one wouldn't she have been beat?
I was looking for this to see if someone else highlighted it before saying it myself. You are completely right and this should be the top comment, she didn't flop the nuts at all.
if the flop hits and there's a pair on the board it always forces you to have a better hand, and when you're playing dog shit like king/4 it is a pretty easy lay down.
Not really, 65 and 53s have no real showdown value (DK is unlikely to have anything lower than top pair) and would absolutely call the first two barrels on pot odds alone. She might also turn 66 into a bluff, having a better claim to a 4, based on preflop, being the last caller. She also can be technically value betting worse (random suited X4's, maybe even 88 and 99 if she put him on top-pair type of holding). While I would probably fold to a sizing that big, I can see calling as well, it's a close one and if DK's playing trash like K4o, he might have enough worse hands in his range to justify calling (against this sizing, K4o needs to be in the top half (or like 45%) of his range for this call to be conditionally correct).
@@joehenry9546 everything he said was not accurate. could be bluffing yes, with exactly 56, which given her course of action is very unlikely. His hand is pretty much face up here, everyone knows he has a 4. He also said she could be value betting 88 or 99 or worse hands. She's never value raising less than a 4 here and probably almost never a 4, he has a bluff catcher only
@@Rude_i_Wredne she's not turning 66 into a bluff here, and there's absolutely no chance she's ever raising 88 or 99 here for value. The only hand DK beats here is 65 or if she got real froggy 3-5. He's losing to every hand she raises here for value
@@skyeangelofdeath7363 He beats a lot of combinations she might take this line with. Worse set of fours playing small suited connectors. Semi bluffing pocket on a dry board. Semi bluffing a missed straight draw with 56. With what cards does her line up until the shove makes sense that he doesnt beat? Specifically pocket 7's, A4s, A3s and 68s if she has a loose definition of suited connectors. Everything else that can actually get the straight should either fold preflop or on the flop. I agree especially with her rep it makes sense to fold, but if you always fold there (as some people here are suggesting they would) you'll get bluffed off a better hand quite a lot because over half the combinations that make sense are ones you have beat.
A3, 77, 22, 55, 63s, and yeah he has blocker to the 45x and A4x but still, first hand after the game clock had been announced....and a bounty hand...easy fold imo but maybe I'm crazy
@@aheroictaxidriver3180 Your comment is hilariously ironic. Since when is never folding your hand the definition of the nuts? Were you sitting out when they were giving out brains?
@@pierrearr Do you know anything about poker? "The nuts" in any given situation is any hand that you would bet your entire stack on. If you have AA in the hole, and the flop comes A45 (rainbow), you have the nuts, even though there's some chance your hand is second best.
Uh, she didn't "flop the nuts." If DK has pocket 4s, she's drawing dead to the case 7. And loses. (Not claiming she misplayed the hand-just that the title of the video is wrong.)
reading through the comments make me feel like you guys should all be playing instead of commenting. You guys make it sound like that's a fold every day of the week.
Against a casual nit like her it is. She won't shove worse for value and she's not strong enough player to turn a weaker hand into a bluff. She might even have 0% bluffs in that spot. It's all about the player type. Against a pro who's balanced and will have enough bluffs in their range calling becomes more reasonable.
@@Dreamline78 oh it just sounds like poker is exclusive only for men. i've never heard anyone saying "a man like ivey, negreneau, et al". instead they say "a player like".
So if he had A-4 suited it would have been okay? That argument only holds water if you flop something marginal. He flopped a monster and just got coolered.
Join our exclusive Discord community for elite poker enthusiasts! Tournaments, weekly events, and lively discussions. Limited spots available - be part of the elite 500! bit.ly/Poker500
link doesn't work
Please rename the title of this video. It's not punting off chips if you believe you're ahead.. Who taught h c l poker?
Invite is STIILL invalid.
"How many times can I get coolered?" -- ANSWER: As many times as you call a raise pre with K4 off.
Yeah not a smart move but after the raise and flopping trips the rest of his moves weren’t that surprising… isn’t that the point of raising with a hand like that… to try and get people out and hope you get a monster on the flop
@@ryanparker3_2_1 If he raised -- fine... but I think he called. Much much worse.
"How can I fold this hand?" Should've folded pre-flop.
🤣🤣
Idk if you’re serious but calling with this hand to get a flop like that is why you play a hand like that. Usually your opponent will have a big overpair if they are call call calling and they are just waiting for you to flip over 9s or something.
@@Johndavidson4 those are very bad odds
@@xukeepax1286bad odds of course, but then those hands are also known as giant killers but in this case he got out flopped but in most cases that’s a win like almost 7:3.
that sigh before she turns her hand over right in front of him lol
Every game needs a DK. He's long on money and short on skill. He brings action.
199%
yea he blows… those guys make the table great some times they run hot and get lucky on you and it stings. But those players are a dream and you just wait for the right moment to snipe them for a double up…
True, someone needs to cover the rake.
Every game needs a Donkey Kong? What?
@@devo076 Dairy King.
She felt bad. She sigh when he called. She didn't want to destroy him.
Not really she faked the sight she really wanted him to call. Otherwise she wouldn’t go all in
"She didn't want to destroy him" but she put him all in 😂😂
She wanted to win. But he started talking and getting depressed. At that point, she didn't want to destroy him completely. She felt bad because she knows the dude was going be depress.
Also, most of us have been in her shoes. When we have a lot of money and feel bad when we destroy a person who makes less than us.
If she wont give him money back she didnt feel THAT bad haha
@@imagine917 how do you know how much these people earn?
The #1 best lesson I have learned about poker is to just fold when i know I'm beat. He puts her on a straight, knows that he's beat, and then calls anyway. It hurts to fold when you're committed like that but it hurts worse to get stacked.
straight isn't even a likely hand considering the betting. she would have had to continued (as an overcall btw) with all combinations of a3 or 68 on a 447 rainbow flop. so straight away, a3 is gone, and then 86, to call turn as well, she would have to have two hearts or be a complete moron. with a name like "sia the bot", i'm questioning the moron status. way more likely she has 77 or filled up with 4x.
The only hand DK was beating was a weaker 4 with a 3 or 6 or bluffs. This was a case of having too much confidence in your hand. He would have been able to escape that preflop and avoided this all together.
committed is the key word , don't commit play the game in the process!
Even great poker players sometimes pay off their opponent when they are almost certain that they are beat. Sometimes it is worth it to get information on the opponent.
This isn't one of those cases.
The guy in the grey shouldn’t be calling hands when decisions are being made .
Just pissing off others.
half of the players on the monday game are losing players in 2/5 at your local casino
Dudes a schmuck he needs to be banned
He's got the weirdest bald spot I've ever seen, it's like the whole left side of his head 😂😂
Just looking at him pissed me off. Some of these tables are annoying as all hell
4:14 that angelic smile would have made me call immediately 🤣🤣🤣
Ditto, and her immense beauty would have made my loss much more tolerable.
that's a $16,000 smile right there
Simp
you mean that plastic surgery smile ;)
@@whatISlife007what I was about to say 🤣
Sniper doom zoom with commentary was hilarious!
He shouldn't have been in the hand anyway. K4 off on a pre-flopped raise. Com'on man!!
King - anything ? 😂
I have to believe he played it because there were only a few hands left.
No shit.
Play the hand your dealt! Fold the hand when you KNOW you are beat! This donkey had no idea.
@@VIPAH That is why you don't play K/4 offsuit.
She’s never going all in with anything less than a full house here.
That's not true. A good player understands that to be the case in most spots, but it's a great place to bluff because that is exactly what they will think. DO you really think she cares that much about a 12K bluff? 12K is nothing to her. Sometimes you just have to understand your opponent. People that the money means nothing to them make some crazy ass moves.
Dk tanking like hes ever folding😂
It’s amazing to see Sia show up with it in every hand and still get paid. Incredible stuff
Which just makes you think "this is the time she's bluffing"
He didn't recognize that her hand could've been made from jump. He was pushing every street as the hunter, then couldn't conceive that he was being trapped the whole way.
or even pocket 5's is plausible too. I couldn't see a player with 3x my stack making a bluff in that spot
Big pocket pairs would just call the value bet. So the only hands that would shove all-in are hands that would beat a 4.
Player took a bad beat earlier in the session and was on tilt. If he thought it through he would have saved some money
he prolly put her on sum over pair lolz
DK is the definition of insanity: doing the same thing expecting different results.
clearly you've never played live poker or been to a casino before
4:30not the fu ck it call 😂
I do that all the time 😂
Q: How do you lose a hand to DK? A: You don't.
Dk is a luck box he wins plenty but in deep stacked spots like this he is no match.
K4 off, a monster! 😂 in all seriousness, this is why I love playing poker, its these guys who pay us off and keep the good times rolling. That was fish play of the highest order. Beautiful.
Played that exact same scenario except it was K3 of hearts and the last 3 came on the river against my nut boat 7s full. We got everything in on the turn was the worst loss in a single hand I’d ever had 10 years ago and still to this day. Ahhh memory lane
WHO THE AMATEUR FISH THAT SAID GOOD CALL? LMAO
I had this exact same situation last night, I had pocket 7's, 2 fours on the board. I made a boat on the turn, which pretty much made it impossible to not lose all my chips against the quad 4's I was facing.
That’s painful. Last tourn I played pretty close to the money I shove with 8s he called with king queen off suit flop. A 8 4 two spades. turn 3 of spades river something of spades he has the queen of spades. I was mad af
A completely different situation actually
@@superninja1984 yeah pocket 8s vs KQo is almost a cointoss but full house loss to quads is a bad beat
no one cares about your bad beat stories, they are never remotely interesting
@@slowery43 no one cares what you think though
Sia genuinely feels bad. She has a great heart ❤️
Doubt that even though she's a good person. She ain't trying to lose her money 😂
She’s a baddie though
@@johnnguyen6469you ain’t lying brotha
and great looks too
Well she's taking money off stupid men who are just giving their money away. I would feel bad for them too. The dumb simps.
Sia if ur reading this. Please dont give away info on the river. Just look straight and stay quiet. And stay on the kill at all times. No mercy lol.
Yes I would have fold after seeing her reaction. It's was an easy fold for anyone with any sense.
The ultimate doom zoom from outside the building lol
the cut to him smoking outside lmfao 5:30
"Goes out on his shield." That's a really nice way of saying "Broke." 😂😂😂
Someone please explain to me how pocket 7's is "The NUTS" on that flop. It's a monster, yes. But the nuts? Did they change the rules of poker when I wasn't looking? Wouldn't pocket 4's be the nuts???
Nuts because someone else folded a 4 and he was drawing deck dead. Hypothetically he could have a better, but not in reality.
4:15 so cute !!!
simp
she cute. Sensual lips cool vibe + beauty. And a sweet look :p She just cute 🤗
simp alert
@@mola4everyourz sayin one is cute = simp? Ok clown.
@@mola4everyourz She's too beautiful for it to count as simping.
That moment when you know you're beat and call anyway. We've all done it.
At least you won't get bluffed next hand.
If there *_IS_* a next hand! MWAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!
She looked SOooooo STRONG 💪 there. What in the world would she be betting with that he could beat?
Yeah i mean she pretty much snap called every bet and went all in pretty quickly too, seemed so strong yet because of that i could see bluffs getting thru played the exact same way, even tho its risky and would take balls
Fish sticks don’t have thought
The way I’m seeing it, is given DK betting 3 streets here in a multi way pot, how often would she really bluff raise all in on the river to such strength? It would have to have her at least pause to think about it. I just think it’s a crying call. Even the announcer knows it’s a fold.
@@joehenry9546 I mean i wouldve folded, i just really dont know much about these players, is she known for making risky bluff plays? If not then it makes folding an even easier choice
If DK checked called her to the river, perhaps he could have saved a bit of 💰💸 unless Sia goes all in, then who knows if he would fold trips.
The beauty of playing king 4 offsuit 😍
Wasn’t this Reza’s favorite hand?
The fact that his gut instinct is putting her on A3 is laughable...and then he still calls LOL
did he also say AK or AQ ?
Putting 45 would be making more sense
Am I a bad person for actually being slightly pleased seeing a fish like DK getting stacked? After having played for years and been at the wrong end of so many fishy players doing stupid stuff and winning pots, it kind of feels like justice. Also, Sia is lovely.
She racks up pretty nice.
@@TheJbenwaa re raise all in on river on a paired board and he blocks 1 single full house
@@TheJbenwaa I've never seen her play any way other than NIT. If she's in to the river vs a 3-street bettor on a paired flop you KNOW she has it. He should have check folded the river.
ego poker ego broke.
If you played for years and can't get those pots back, YOU might be the fish, sir.
Quad 4’s would have been flopping the nuts
Yup. Lazy writing / almost clickbait
For that matter, he didn't bet every street either. He called on the flop.
Could have been quads over quads, so not even quad 4's is the nuts with 2 cards to come. Very hard to flop the nuts without a straight flush. I once flopped a Royal Flush at a WSOP Circuit Event, and that was flopping the nuts (my hole cards were JTs and flop was AKQs).
@@Mark-rw3kw buddy flopping the nuts on the flop means flopping the best hand on the flop, not looking at the cards that are yet to come. The nuts can change, altough yeah, 4s was the nuts here
@@GlennFrodo I prefer to reserve the word "nuts' for the best possible hand at the river, even if the river has not happened yet. It is not uncommon to have the best hand after the flop and still lose the hand. Because if someone has the best possible hand at the river, and only the flop or turn has been played, one needs to know that and needs to call it something different than just having the best hand at that point.
She didn't flop the nuts, as she wasn't holding a pair of fours 🤦♂️
Quad 4s is impossible because DK has one, ergo, 7s full IS the nuts.
@@fomori2 I never wrote that it was possible given cards held by others in which a player would be unaware, only possible for that particular flop, holding a pair of fours would have been the nuts. Holding a pair of fours remains the nuts for that flop. End of.
@@IkonAndDiva690 From the perspective of the viewer 7s full is the nuts, which is what WE are.
From the perspective of the players in the hand, once DK reveals his cards, the players also know 7s full is the nuts.
Now, in the moment of imperfect information, aka at the time the players were playing the hand, it was POSSIBLE that quad 4's were the nuts, but then shown to be impossible through revealed information.
Since you never pointed out your reference frame in your initial post, you sir are WRONG.
effective nuts because DK had a 4... sure from Sia POV DK could have had 44... but in what world does flopped quads lead betting?? Almost never, Sia had the nuts
Sia would never be playing a/3 in a pot like that and she is never bluffing the river like that either. Just gotta lay that one down every time against that player. DK was up so much that session, he just can’t help being a calling station
She could maybe have A3hh... but he loses to that also.
She was on the button. She easily could have had A3. But when she barely thought about calling his half-pot bet on the turn, the nit should have slammed on the brakes. He fell in love with his hand and was already mentally counting his stack. That he called her quick, confident all-in was laughable. He said his head was spinning - pretty sure his head is always spinning. Sure wish home games had calling stations like him.
Haha, this is the realest coverage ever and Sia, uh yeah!
Never seen Sia before, and OMG she is beautiful and graceful. Well done.
DK doesn’t play to win he plays for fun, so I hope he had fun 👍🏻
He also plays to lose lol
He didn't have fun. But we did.
He did not have fun after rushing for a smoke 🤏
Sia essentially said she had it with the look she gave around 4:15
DK should not have exposed his cards when he said "How can I fold this hand?" because he could be digging for a reaction from SIA the Bot which might have influenced his decision to fold or to go all in.
Wow. Brazil Turd’s combover is epic. He can’t hide that bald spot with a cowboy hat if he tried.
Love when DK gets stacked
can't see Sia bluffing there. In fact, I don't recall watching a hand she bluffed at.
He smoked a cigarette then pawned his gold ring. Got 700. Went to play craps. 20 minutes later he was trying sell his watch. He got 250 for it and went to play roullette. I saw him next day wearing a batman costume on freemont.
The moment I saw that smile, I woulda snap folded. Clearest tell you'll ever get.
Love it when they spew what can I beat
DK took so long when everyone including himself knew he was calling.
That's not a punt in my eyes.. That's a cooler... punting is when you have a garbage hand and give your stack up
If dk watches the hustler clips highlights he would know why they get so many views 😊
HAHA "HEY! CAMERA GUY!" NO!"
I mean, it's a great bluff when no flush draws are out there, plus the overpair possibilities. But man that's a clear fold, it'd be one hell of an exploit vs a good tight player who triples off only to get raised and KNOW they need to overfold.
Sia is as tight solid a player as you get. She's not the type to make a river bluff with marginal or a missed draw like 65. She's more likely trapping a monster in position. Against alot of other players...that's a good call.
Solid players bluff there too. Nits don't. There's a difference.
Not saying she's either.
He was losing to A4, A3, 42, 54, 77, 55, 22 and 63. That's what happens when you play bad hands like K4o and think you got the nuts.
"not the fuck-it call" lmfao
Let this be lesson: when you flat pre with K4o, sometimes bad shit happens 🤷♂️
This dude just flatted K4o from the cutoff.
5:32 camera guy: say my name
At what point did she have the nuts? It wasn't the flop, the turn, or the river. Having the other two 4s would have been the nuts.
Playing reverse implied hands PF often end up like this. He was CO, not BB, just fold pre.
What bluff does she have here? Lol😂
She has no bluffs, so why bluff when you have no bluffs? Unless the bluff is the bluff so that she can't be bluffing as she has no bluffs so it ain't a bluff and she ain't bluffing. Maybe it was the right play at the wrong time. And in 37 years, everyone will choose spots when they have no bluffs and bluff like fuck, and that will be standard, and to not bluff when bluffing makes zero sense, will be considered eccentric and outlandish. Who knows.
I wish this happened at my home games lol… FISHY FISH!
lol thank you Sia for talking him to the cleaners - guy lost over $60k and all he had left was a cigarette
playing K4 off suit with pre flop raise, very good lol
LOL the way he left. Proper destroyed.
Sia took his chips, then she took my heart.
He can’t show his hand for minutes while deciding to call or not . He’s trying to see if she signals strength or weakness. That should be illegal, I’m glad he lost.
DGAF proving not only GOAT commentator status but he's actually a very acute player.
Just listen 4:48 onwards. Genuinely think he would be able to find a fold in that spot. (while proving what a mediocre player Nate is)
Given the context of how well Sia was running and how bad DK was running
Poker is one of the only games where its so hard to feel truly good about a huge win. Especially when playing with just friends. But it's not that much fun crushing strangers either when they have hands they just cant lay down.
I mean...until they leave then i feel really good.
I can relate to that. And you are being honest.
He bets the literal bottom of his range, gets raised, and calls. He must have thought this was the one time in ten the nit was bluffing.
Well, trips with second best kicker isn't necessary the bottom of his betting range. I think you could make the case for playing like this (until the call on the reraise) even with top pair and a decent kicker (A7, K7s), so while going for value with worse 4 or a marginal overpair (88, 99) is on the greedier side, she could do that. She also has natural bluff candidates in a form of 65 and 53s.
I can see calling, though I'm not sure if for a sizing that big. Against a reraise overbet, he's allowed to fold pretty much the bottom half of his range. Considering how many sets are there (77 x3 ,22 x3 ,55? x3(2?) ,74s x1,54s x2 , 42s? x1, 54o? x6(4?)), a random straight with 86s (4 combos, maybe 2 of which he'd choose in this line as semibluffs - A3 I think would not play this way) and 8 combos of A4, he has 26-31 better hands, so K4o probably doesn't make the cut.
Sia is not even close to a nit
@@Rude_i_Wredne Not against Sia, genius.
@@dalekerr5091 Yeah, and a pin is nothing like a needle.
DK doesn't think in terms of ranges or what the opponent is doing. His thought-process is basically "I HAZ TRIPS".
Love ❤️ sia and the camera guy.
I'm glad she won, but the title says she flopped the nuts. Maybe I'm mistaken, but if her opponent had two fours instead of one wouldn't she have been beat?
I was looking for this to see if someone else highlighted it before saying it myself. You are completely right and this should be the top comment, she didn't flop the nuts at all.
There was already one 4 on an opponent's hand, considering all card that are in play as shown, she does have the nuts
@@ianmeana1987 Thanks. I missed that.
"Tis better to be the Tilter than the Tiltee" Shakespeare
Only thing I've learned is if someone smooth calls flop and turn and then Jams river they might have a monster hand.
I'm going to start doing this with bluffs.
if the flop hits and there's a pair on the board it always forces you to have a better hand, and when you're playing dog shit like king/4 it is a pretty easy lay down.
Sia never shoves a 4 or a straight here. Only boats lol. DK is crazy bad. Feels great to see em get stacked
Sia is gorgeous yet can rip opponent heart out with those slender man like finger.... Shiver***
Hard to call that, she's never bluffing in that situation.
Not really, 65 and 53s have no real showdown value (DK is unlikely to have anything lower than top pair) and would absolutely call the first two barrels on pot odds alone. She might also turn 66 into a bluff, having a better claim to a 4, based on preflop, being the last caller.
She also can be technically value betting worse (random suited X4's, maybe even 88 and 99 if she put him on top-pair type of holding).
While I would probably fold to a sizing that big, I can see calling as well, it's a close one and if DK's playing trash like K4o, he might have enough worse hands in his range to justify calling (against this sizing, K4o needs to be in the top half (or like 45%) of his range for this call to be conditionally correct).
Know your opponent. Sia the bot literally is a nit with no bluff at river showdown.
@@Rude_i_Wredne , everything you wrote is accurate. But, how often do you think the Nit Sia is bluffing here to make this call profitable?
@@joehenry9546 everything he said was not accurate. could be bluffing yes, with exactly 56, which given her course of action is very unlikely. His hand is pretty much face up here, everyone knows he has a 4. He also said she could be value betting 88 or 99 or worse hands. She's never value raising less than a 4 here and probably almost never a 4, he has a bluff catcher only
@@Rude_i_Wredne she's not turning 66 into a bluff here, and there's absolutely no chance she's ever raising 88 or 99 here for value. The only hand DK beats here is 65 or if she got real froggy 3-5. He's losing to every hand she raises here for value
Cigarette tastes so good after a bad call 😂
love cherry commentators who know the right play coz they can see all the hands
I'm guessing you are referring to them saying he should fold to her river jam? That's just solid poker. He beats nothing but air.
@@skyeangelofdeath7363 He beats a lot of combinations she might take this line with. Worse set of fours playing small suited connectors. Semi bluffing pocket on a dry board. Semi bluffing a missed straight draw with 56.
With what cards does her line up until the shove makes sense that he doesnt beat?
Specifically pocket 7's, A4s, A3s and 68s if she has a loose definition of suited connectors.
Everything else that can actually get the straight should either fold preflop or on the flop.
I agree especially with her rep it makes sense to fold, but if you always fold there (as some people here are suggesting they would) you'll get bluffed off a better hand quite a lot because over half the combinations that make sense are ones you have beat.
Whoever named this clip needs to re-think clickbait. It’s clearly not ripping the nuts
@3.23 DK A3?!?! 😂😂😂
He gonna get drunk and talk about this hand for the whole week 😅
This is why you need to know the standings of every two cards you holds. K4 off-suit is a throw away hand, even in the big blind.
The dreaded chasing losses tilt.
is it just me or is this an easy fold to her river jam? a million hands beat him.
A3, 77, 22, 55, 63s, and yeah he has blocker to the 45x and A4x but still, first hand after the game clock had been announced....and a bounty hand...easy fold imo but maybe I'm crazy
Lol at the commentary focusing on DK! Hey camera guy!
I missed the part where she flops the nuts
Because she didn't
I missed the part where you gained self-awareness. She's never folding, so she had the nuts.
@@aheroictaxidriver3180 Your comment is hilariously ironic. Since when is never folding your hand the definition of the nuts? Were you sitting out when they were giving out brains?
@@pierrearr Do you know anything about poker? "The nuts" in any given situation is any hand that you would bet your entire stack on. If you have AA in the hole, and the flop comes A45 (rainbow), you have the nuts, even though there's some chance your hand is second best.
@@aheroictaxidriver3180 Have you even played poker before? The nuts is the best possible hand on a given board, she has the second nuts
DK looked like Phil Hellmuth reincarnated
DK=donkey Kong. What a dumb call! 😂😂😂😂
DK doesn’t even have a boat. He must have been tilting badly.
Uh, she didn't "flop the nuts." If DK has pocket 4s, she's drawing dead to the case 7. And loses.
(Not claiming she misplayed the hand-just that the title of the video is wrong.)
reading through the comments make me feel like you guys should all be playing instead of commenting.
You guys make it sound like that's a fold every day of the week.
Against a casual nit like her it is. She won't shove worse for value and she's not strong enough player to turn a weaker hand into a bluff. She might even have 0% bluffs in that spot. It's all about the player type. Against a pro who's balanced and will have enough bluffs in their range calling becomes more reasonable.
She doesnt care for your bad beat she wants your money all.of it
If a woman like Sia is in a pot with you and calling every street and then shoving...she aint bluffing.
"woman"?
@@PurpleHaze4me She's a woman, and they referred to her as such. What's the issue?
@@Dreamline78 cause her being a woman has absolutely nothing to do with the hand lmfao
@@Dreamline78 oh it just sounds like poker is exclusive only for men. i've never heard anyone saying "a man like ivey, negreneau, et al". instead they say "a player like".
Women are usually never bluffjng,they have it
When you finally realize you ARE the sucker at the table
Didn't flop the nuts, the nuts be 44
And that’s why you don’t play K4 off
So if he had A-4 suited it would have been okay? That argument only holds water if you flop something marginal. He flopped a monster and just got coolered.
@@paulmayer8654 Not a monster, not even close.
@@jamesflaherty59 k-4 is the best hand on the flop 99% of time. That's a monster.
What do you mean, good call?
Sevens full 😮
Yeah, no shit 😂
"the nuts" would be quad 4s on that flop...
Technically, she didn't flop The Nuts. Nuts would have been Quads (Four of a Kind), with pocket 4s in hand.
The camera guy tho lol