Observe the Universe from Deep Space [NIAC 2023]

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 55

  • @disinclinedto-state9485
    @disinclinedto-state9485 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Such good audio from your interlocutor on this one! Kudos to him for incidentally making it easier on my busted old ears. :)

    • @frasercain
      @frasercain  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's always great when they have good audio on their side.

  • @serbannicolau3489
    @serbannicolau3489 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Two interviews in one day! Keep them coming! It's a joy!

  • @formarosastudio
    @formarosastudio ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This was amazing ! What an exciting development and loved the conversation, super techy but still tangible 🙌🏼

    • @frasercain
      @frasercain  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Awesome, I'm really glad you enjoyed it.

  • @alphanaut14
    @alphanaut14 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love your NIAC and CubeSat interviews!

  • @anthempt3edits
    @anthempt3edits ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Another interview! Exactly what I needed. Thanks Fraser!

  • @DavidTremblay
    @DavidTremblay ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This NIAC serie of interviews is epic

    • @frasercain
      @frasercain  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I'm glad you're enjoying them.

  • @ronakmist
    @ronakmist ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This was awesome and I'm sure it'll spur great ideas. Looking forward to part 2!

  • @dropshot1967
    @dropshot1967 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    love the concept and the enthusiasm.

  • @joelwismer
    @joelwismer ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Absolutely excellent video Fraser ! More interviews like this one please 😊

  • @johnbennett1465
    @johnbennett1465 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Fraser, you need to re-listen to his description of the telescope mission. He said going about 5 AU out of the ecliptic. You feed it back as going past Pluto. I don't know if he missed this or what, since he didn't correct you.
    Great interview, but mistakes like this are easy to make during the interview. You might want to add a review step before publishing to catch things like this.

  • @jamess.2599
    @jamess.2599 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My favorite interview

  • @galaxya40s95
    @galaxya40s95 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great as always. Can't wait for part 2.

    • @frasercain
      @frasercain  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Next Thursday. 😀

    • @galaxya40s95
      @galaxya40s95 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@frasercain Awesome!
      Thank you for these interviews, they are a real treat.

  • @sarcasmo57
    @sarcasmo57 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hurry up and make it.

    • @frasercain
      @frasercain  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hah, this is phase 2. Next phase 3, then maybe they do a test mission.

  • @PetraKann
    @PetraKann ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Engineers are scientists with a design and technology emphasis which is why an engineering degree is longer than a standard science degree. Usually 4 years compared to 3 years respectively.
    Engineering qualifications are amongst the most difficult and challenging for students to complete.

  • @bernhardjordan9200
    @bernhardjordan9200 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    That thing can be paired with the solar sail of the other niac grant from the last week?
    If it's possible, how fast it can go?

  • @michaelkrakenshan
    @michaelkrakenshan ปีที่แล้ว

    Another very interesting topic and interview. Thanks !

  • @unvergebeneid
    @unvergebeneid ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Haha, when I read "fastest telescope" I thought it had a huge aperture 😅

  • @Temp0raryName
    @Temp0raryName ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Some isotopes are stable until they are changed into a shorter-lived isotope. Take that along as a late-stage power source, e.g. a sample return. To be altered when needed. Or, if you can gradually transform the isotope, you can use it to replace the initial isotope, as its half-life reduces its power output below optimal levels, for a given mission.

    • @oberonpanopticon
      @oberonpanopticon ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ooo, that’s a cool idea!
      Though the fact that it wouldn’t decay all at once would probably lead to it giving a fairly constant power output. Well, a fairly constantly decreasing power output.

  • @undertow2142
    @undertow2142 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The stirling converter NASA has been testing for 14 yrs seems like a great source of enough power. The heat source can be kept far away from everything using molten salts to conduct the heat to the engine.

    • @titanbot11
      @titanbot11 ปีที่แล้ว

      They want to use a solid state method of power generation to minimize points of failure.

    • @undertow2142
      @undertow2142 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@titanbot11 14 years continuous operation. It has one moving part.

  • @jaimeduncan6167
    @jaimeduncan6167 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We need numbers. For example performance vs the classic plutonium.

  • @mitseraffej5812
    @mitseraffej5812 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    0:42 “ Twelve astronomical unite per year”
    This is approximately 0.018% the speed of light. Fast, but still not going to cut the mustard if we want to go galavanting around the galaxy boldly going where no man has gone before.

  • @uuzd4s
    @uuzd4s ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Question Spacemeister; Presuming that SpaceX's StarShip is online and fully operable in 3 or 4 yrs, It will have a Payload Capacity of 5-10 x that of the Ariane 5 that launched JWST to it's place @ L2.
    So, using the weight and size limit advantages of a rocket like SS, what would your company, Cain Space Telescopes, develop as a Next Gen Space Telescope, what "mission statement" would be the goal and where would you place it ? (No worries, I'll pay for the Launch ; )

  • @PhonicallyPsychotic
    @PhonicallyPsychotic ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Isoformers more then meets the nuclei :P

    • @istvansipos9940
      @istvansipos9940 ปีที่แล้ว

      First, I didn't know which ww2 general I was lookin' at. Then my Patton recognition kicked in.

  • @TeethToothman
    @TeethToothman ปีที่แล้ว

    ❤❤❤

  • @oberonpanopticon
    @oberonpanopticon ปีที่แล้ว

    I’m only halfway through the video but I really hope they talk about what isotopes in particular they’d actually be using.

  • @michaelmcconnell7302
    @michaelmcconnell7302 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This man is proposing we build a Discovery One and I'm here for it. What are the chances of including an AI on the mission? 😁

    • @galaxya40s95
      @galaxya40s95 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not sure we want to send out Von Neumann probes yet 😂

  • @jwwebnaut7045
    @jwwebnaut7045 ปีที่แล้ว

    Exciting prospects! However, did I miss something or were safety aspects just glossed over? What happens if the start of such a rocket goes wrong or the second stage has to be exploded? Imho these issues need to be addressed before anything else.

  • @jarihaukilahti
    @jarihaukilahti ปีที่แล้ว

    What if the rotation of Omuamua actually were part of the craft doing visual interferometry - having their telescopes at both ends of the craft (or one if there is a rocketnozzle at the endpart ). If the craft are 100m long penn then its a 100m? telescope or its a sail with the telescopes in the 4 corners -obviously maybe weaker ones

  • @DavidsDreamFactory
    @DavidsDreamFactory ปีที่แล้ว

    ​What is the event horizon telescope doing these days? we get new images from hubble and jwst pretty consistently but rarely hear about what this "earth sized" telescope is up to

  • @TroyRubert
    @TroyRubert ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Seems like the next logical step. Why not send three in different directions and allow it to act as an array?

    • @istvansipos9940
      @istvansipos9940 ปีที่แล้ว

      budget. That's why. Be glad IF we build 1.

    • @TroyRubert
      @TroyRubert ปีที่แล้ว

      @@istvansipos9940 these things always end up paying for themselves in the long run. Dare mighty things.

    • @istvansipos9940
      @istvansipos9940 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TroyRubert I know. Everybody (those responsible for any budget) knows this, I think. Still, they have the money the have and no more. Which means that, even if they KNOW the long term benefits, they are still limited by their budget. Especially because they have to spend on short term things (f.e. salaries), too.

  • @Raz.C
    @Raz.C ปีที่แล้ว

    Re - NIAC Grant
    I'd LOVE to get one of those grants!!!!
    I could explore the effects of complete and utter isolation on a person (ie - NO contact with the outside world at all, no TV/ radio/ internet/ phone/ smoke signals/ etc) and how this affects -my- his psyche, especially after 6-month diet of nothing but Heroin and Hookers!!! In the interests of fairness, I could set up my research station in the Sahara desert and try growing crops there, try getting water from the environment, try using both solar and mechanical means of producing energy. I could even extend the H&H diet (Hookers n Heroin) to an entire year before beginning the isolation!!

  • @AvyScottandFlower
    @AvyScottandFlower ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool concept but I'm afraid any kind of significant speed is gonna mean RAPID deterioration/disassembly of any spacecraft/usable payload, before any kind of appropriate shielding develops, from those first failed attempts
    But a necessary and cool 1st step, still

    • @frasercain
      @frasercain  ปีที่แล้ว

      It's not relativistic speeds, it's not much different speed compared to the speed that Earth is orbiting the Sun.

    • @AvyScottandFlower
      @AvyScottandFlower ปีที่แล้ว

      @@frasercain Well I think it might end up being like the effects on JWST, but amplified according to the speed.

  • @Djfmdotcom
    @Djfmdotcom ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Could the James Webb telescope be tasked to take a picture of Omuamua? (Not an astronomer or astrophysicist)

  • @takanara7
    @takanara7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why not just use more plutonium to get more power? Seems like using a different isotope would make things really complicated, since you need a whole supply line for it.

    • @frasercain
      @frasercain  ปีที่แล้ว

      It's all about the half-life versus heat output. Different isotopes for different jobs

  • @SajiSNairNair-tu9dk
    @SajiSNairNair-tu9dk 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    👉human understand one soul is awackaning to universe from 😂🌻🐝