Get your Trifolds and 5th Amendment Cop Cards on www.DeleteLawZ.com Thanks, Chille @ChilleDeCastro PayPal @Chille-DeCastro Venmo $ChilleDeCastro Cashapp
If the citizen is going to help an officer arrest someone at that point the citizen should be held accountable as well as the officer if it is not a legal arrest.
I would think the citizen can be charged with assault regardless if they are helping an officer or not or it might be allowed if you are helping an officer.
This tyrant needs to be fired and prosecuted to the fullest possible extent of the law. These tyrants have no place in law enforcement. He is angry and out of control. I hope this tyrant sued to the full extent of the law.
You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to do so by police. See SCOTUS ruling in Mimms vs PA. It applies to all occupants of the vehicle as well.
@@cronicleofadaytrader7105 guess what you have to fight it in court not on the side of the road and once he refuses to get out the car he broke the law
@@cronicleofadaytrader7105 did you even look into mimms v PA or look up anything, are you just basking in ignorance? The Supreme Court has ruled several times you have to exit you vehicle when asked if you've been pulled over. IF YOU THINK IT'S UNCONSTITUTIONAL THEN TAKE IT UP IN COURT NOT ON THE STREET. Arguing doesn't help your case just makes it worse
A few years ago in Chicago, people were intentionally hitting police on the side of the road as they pulled people over. Several state troopers were killed within a few months. I was tickled pink.
@@howlinwulf Yeah, I'd hate to save the bastard and then be responsible for someone elses right's getting violated or worse. Best to let nature sort it out as intended.
The cop already called for back-up. All he had to do was wait. His ego got the better of him. He needs to lose his job and have a huge lawsuit filed against him, and also the ass clown who joined the assault. This is shameful.
At what point does this become a self defense situation? After the first elbow to the face? I hope this tyrant was fired and sued along with the person that helped with this assault.
If a grandmother said why did you stop me and wouldn’t get out this cop would give her elbow strikes to gain compliance . What a piece of excrement and a terrible human being.
It wasn't a grandmother it was an overgrown child playing the rebellious game and lost. Grown up don't act like this and if they do they get the elbow and zapped.
@@AmericanProud7 there is a video out there of a grandma getting tased. All because she wasn’t going to comply. You tase my grandma the worms will be eating good. It sounds like you think you know the law obviously, you don’t read and do research on your own. You are a asshat sir. A complete asshat!
You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to by police. Multiple courts have upheld this. If it's an illegal stop then take that up in court, but failure to comply will not do you any favors on the street, or in court. You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to do so by police. See SCOTUS ruling in Mimms vs PA. It applies to all occupants of the vehicle as well.
Sue him for what hurt feelings. He failed to produce his licence when requested. He resisted the police and he was subdued and arrested. I'm not seeing the lawsuit
@@TheLoopuss he withheld the licence after being asked several times. The police are not obligated to tell you why before. He failed to comply with a lawful order and for that he got the mauling and cuffs. Moral of the story...... Don't play games
@@AmericanProud7 Reasonable articulable suspicion is what an officer needs to perform an “investigatory” stop which he didnt have obviously. Do you personally think he did a good job protecting and serving hes community? The guy cooperated but also stood up for hes rights, nothing more nothing less.. You are just a trol or a scum bag cop your self man 🤡 He has been taught to de-escalate the situation in the Academy which he he didnt do. He could have, if he stated the case why he pulled him over and needed hes driving license. Cops always state the case when making a trafficking stop "the reasson i pulled you over is ..." and often then make up a lie. They have too. He got charged with disordly conduct which is a missdemenor and the definition is "intentional disturbing of the PUBLIC PEACE and order by language or other conduct" which he didnt do. He maybe hurt the cops ego by not obey him like a sheep (like you would of done which is clear by your comments 🐑😂) but nothing more. Cops just need to learn how to do their job and be a decent human being and they would get some respect by the public and not just clowns like you. Go blow a cop man 🤡🤡
After a long ten years of research and filing, he was given recoupment in the amount of $100,000,000.00 dollars for violations evident to all here today.
That copper is it disgusting human Being. And to make it even worse you will never even spend a minute in jail. He probably spent half of his life dreaming of doing this two people couldn't wait to become a cop so he could
From memory I think the dude was intoxicated, hence the arrest. Normally I don't back the cops but in this case the drunk guy needed to be off the road.
Why won't the officer tell the driver why he was stopped? • He's gonna tell him at some point? • Why is he treating it like a secret? •What's the big deal?
That's my biggest problem with cops not announcing the crime 1st above all else. It's a ploy for cops to dig and find a problem. Then they throw out there I smell alcohol or weed. This cop isn't very smart or never paid attention in class. The whole ordeal is stupid to escalate this on a dangerous road without back up. He broke many of his rights Just like you said, they act that the citizen has no right to know the reason they were pulled over. That way if it's bogus they can make something up as we've seen on other videos. The days of cops violating citizens rights are being exposed daily. Costing tax payer money to pay off citizens who were violated for no reason other than ego.
You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to by police. Multiple courts have upheld this. If it's an illegal stop then take that up in court, but failure to comply will not do you any favors on the street, or in court. You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to do so by police. See SCOTUS ruling in Mimms vs PA. It applies to all occupants of the vehicle as well.
@fennectempest1590 the way to counter Mimms v PA is if you can prove on video that you were of no threat to officer safety (ie., not armed, not belligerent). An officer can only lawfully demand you get out of he suspects you are a threat to his safety. If you can prove you're not a threat (ie, this video), it is an unlawful order that can be turned around as officer's excuse to escalate.
Once again the badge doesn't give you power it gives you responsibility. This officer needs to leave his feelings at home. Tell the guy what he did wrong, write him a citation if need be and go about your day. This is ridiculous. Prime example why the citizens dispise the police.
Handing your documents to the officer is a simple and requested everyday. If you don't You have escalated the situation. You guys like the 4th Amendment about ID. However that does not apply to driving. You are required to present your license
@@AmericanProud7 That is the point, the police HAVE to identify the reason for stopping and explain the alleged crime committed. Probable cause established, they can ask for ID. Otherwise, they have no particular authority over a citizen. Their training strangely enforces the opposite. They try and control a situation by establish dominance, are barely polite on the verge on always being aggressive and think they are kind of above the law. They walk around like they own the place and treat everyone like thye are automatically guilty before they can be proved innocent. All while with our tax dollars. Their training has them on edge, wired to look out and be scared of the people they are serving. Even if the police get sued, the officers are barely affected. It'll be the tax payers ponying up again. They simply exchange offices. Deputy here, officer there, agent somewhere else but complains and trail of victims in his trail. If it actually catches up to them they are "offered" reignation.. with pension of course. All this officer had to do was let the guy know what reason he had to pull him over and he couldn't do that??!! remember the officer is on the clock. The guy being pulled over has no legal obligation towards professionalism while its mandatory for the Police.
@@naimanwar8113 point taken.. I'm not intimidated by the police. I'm polite they're polite. If they are a butt head I try and end the encounter as soon as possible. Cops aren't always the brightest people. Some have skills and others are kinda dumb. I'm kinda smart and go on with my life without drama. Crying about dumb cops is useless. Lots of good cops around
For simple traffic stops, officers should be required to first state why the officer has pulled an individual over prior to receiving insurance and a driver's license or immediately let the person go on their way.
should have been posted immediately after this happened, and the county police department office responsible for this , with their telephone number to put pressure on them to fire this dirty cop, yes and a lawsuit should have been filed
The guy assisting doesn't have a clue. I personally would have assisted the officer also not knowing the situation. This officer is not suitable to be a police officer..
@@alan8887 Once he refused to exit the vehicle it became a lawful arrest, regardless of why he was stopped. You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to do so by police. See SCOTUS ruling in Mimms vs PA. It applies to all occupants of the vehicle as well.
it became a lawful arrest when he refused to get out of the car. You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to do so by police. See SCOTUS ruling in Mimms vs PA. It applies to all occupants of the vehicle as well.
I do not believe every situation, there are a few respectful peace officers out there. For the most part you are correct. We still should have faith that they all are not bad. Negative energy brings negativity.
You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to by police. Multiple courts have upheld this. If it's an illegal stop then take that up in court, but failure to comply will not do you any favors on the street, or in court. You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to do so by police. See SCOTUS ruling in Mimms vs PA. It applies to all occupants of the vehicle as well.
It became a game where the officer's ego got involved and he didn't want this man to "win." During most professionally done traffic stops, the first thing a cop does is identify themselves and state why they pulled you over. That's nearly universal.
Except cops are not legally required to tell you the reason for the stop. And neither are they legally required to voluntarily identify themselves. If you ask them to identify themselves, then they are legally required to provide that information. But they are not legally required to volunteer that information. that said, it's a standard practice for cops to voluntarily identify themselves, and provide the reason for the stop before asking for ID, but it's not legally required...
You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to do so by police. See SCOTUS ruling in Mimms vs PA. It applies to all occupants of the vehicle as well.
Common courtesy would require the officer to explain the reason for the stop. Otherwise there is no way for the driver to know whether it is a legal stop. And if it is not a legal stop then there is no legal tasering or use of force.
it became a lawful arrest when he refused to get out of the car. You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to do so by police. See SCOTUS ruling in Mimms vs PA. It applies to all occupants of the vehicle as well.
@@fennectempest1590 Bullshit. Just because something is ruled as such by the SCOTUS doesn't make it right according to the Constitution's Bill of Rights. Remember it was SCOTUS that allowed the NFA of 1934, the GCA of 1968 and countless other violations of the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights and the 2nd Amendment in particular was created to arm and protect citizens from our own government. How does that Right stay in effect after the Government usurps control over which weapons, citizens are allowed to retain?
Police should be required by law to articulate the reason behind the stop. Then being able to just run your information before that is given, completely violates your Fourth amendment.
I agree, they should. But as it stands, they don't have to. Argue law in court, not on the side of the road. Change isn't going to happen unless we change legislation.
Look up Delaware v Prouse 1979. "Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that police may not stop motorists without any reasonable suspicion to suspect crime or illegal activity to check their driver's license and auto registration."
@jonathantillian6528 However if they do have probable cause, they can ask for your ID without explaining every detail first. Not defending this cops actions.
@@SusieY-mn4oz...because you have a right to be secure in your persons, papers, and effects. The pig does have to state the purpose, and nature of the stop. Otherwise, they could just stop people to check their papers like the Nazi's did.
A lot of COPS are ex military, which means they are thugs who are used to using violence to impose their will on the dumbed down slave peasant sheeple of the world and of course its own slaves as well.. You suckers got conned and played. The Government never cared about you tax paying slaves they rule over. They just pretend to from time to time to save face. Now there is no need for most of us. So killing us would be a welcome policy if Biden decides to call anyone who resists him and his Demonic WOKE Democratic traitors who are owned by the Muslims and China.. America is dead and Communism is here to stay. Sorry but you all got conquered from within.
You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to do so by police. See SCOTUS ruling in Mimms vs PA. It applies to all occupants of the vehicle as well.
NOT true, at all. The SCOTUS has ruled that even IF the stop were found to be unlawful, getting someone out of the car (ANYONE out of the car) is lawful per PA v Mimms. Know the law before you say something inaccurate.
You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to by police. Multiple courts have upheld this. If it's an illegal stop then take that up in court, but failure to comply will not do you any favors on the street, or in court.
@@AmbientShades The road is a public space. There is no law that states the police nor courts can dictate the free movement of anyone in public. The one exception is when a crime is about, being or going to be committed. Stopping someone without any reasonable articulable suspicion is illegal, doing such with the threat of violence is unlawful. A cop cannot command you unless you are about, being or in the process of committing a crime. That includes commanding people to get out of a car. If there is such a rule, regulation, etc. it is unconstitutional, meaning it is conspiracy and treason. Shadow courts and shadow police who are enforcing faux laws are threats to the nation and must be held accountable accordingly.
Or in simple terms. Police and courts are there to catch and process justice unto bad people, anyone who is not bad people should hardly realize police and courts exist in the first place.
Actually the cop is 100% within the law. He does not have tell someone why he pulled them over until court or on the ticket . The driver is required to give over the driver’s license. He refused . The officer arrested him and he resisted arrest. There is a reason the host of the video is just calling him names instead of citing laws and case law of how the officer was wrong . Why? Because the officers actions were correct under the law .
@@crjcrj8443 You are worse than the officer if you believe this, because you are saying it cold and calculated, whereas he acted in the heat of the moment....
This must be what our forefathers intended when they wrote our right to travel freely in the pursuit of life, liberty & the pursuit of happiness. Incidents like these is exactly why officers should not have immunity!
DO YOU SEE THE DISCONNECTION BETWEEN CIVILIANS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT, THIS OFFICER NEEDS TO BE ARRESTED, FOR ASSAULT! THIS IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF TYRANTS BEING OUT OF CONTROL, THIS OFFICER VIOLATED THIS MAN'S CIVIL RIGHTS, BY NOT " IDENTIFING", AND NOT EXPRESSING "WHY I PULLED YOU OVER FOR" THIS IS BLATANT DISREGARD FOR THE MAN'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, I HOPE HE SUES THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, FOR VIOLATING AND ABUSING, ASSAULTING HIM!! THIS TYRANT NEEDS TO BE FIRED AND CHARGED CRIMINALLY, THIS MENTALITY MUST STOP " POLICE REFORM NOW" THIS MUST STOP IT IS CONTINUALLY HAPPENING THROUGHOUT AMERICA! LADIES AND GENTLEMEN PLEASE VOTE TO CHANGE LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING AND PSYCHOLOGICALLY EVALUATE EVERY OFFICER EVERY THREE YEARS TO SEE IF THEY " BECOME STRESSED OUT, UNFIT TO CONDUCT THEMSELVES IN A PROFESSIONAL MANNER! POLICE REFORM NOW!!!! THE DRIVER ASKED " WHO ARE YOU" AND WHY DID YOU PULL ME OVER WHICH ARE QUESTIONS THAT THE OFFICER " MUST ANSWER" DO YOU SEE THE DISCONNECTION! Remove qualified immunity for all public sector employees, the courts and eliminate public sector unions which are inherently unconstitutional
PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION Yes...I also think they need serious DRUG testing. He looked and acted like someone that is so roided up he can't think straight. Shirt was two sizes to small, Like who dresses that clown...Lawsuit for sure.
@@bertbeeler8333 that is the scariest and most insane idea I have ever heard of. Thankfully that will never ever, ever ever ever, going to happen snd for good reason. Privatize the cops, he said!! 🤣
It's called holding our public officials accountable. We have every right to question them. They may not like it but they have been violating our rights for far to long. And now it to the point where they think they don't have to answer to anyone.
You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to by police. Multiple courts have upheld this. If it's an illegal stop then take that up in court, but failure to comply will not do you any favors on the street, or in court. You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to do so by police. See SCOTUS ruling in Mimms vs PA. It applies to all occupants of the vehicle as well.
I commute too and from work five days a week. When I see a cop, I do not feel safe and protected. Instead I feel anxiety and wonder too myself "what am I doing wrong?" that might attract his attention.
That is why I hate driving through certain municipalities or even certain stretches of the interstate. For example, there are certain places around St Louis, where adhering to the posted speed limit and driving responsibly in a non aggressive manner, will either put you at risk of being in an accident or being harassed by other drivers. Every time I feel like it is one of those nature documentaries where the water buffaloes are running and the lions are trying to pick them off. Do you risk getting run over, or risk potentially being singled out by the police? God forbid it's some tyrant who is trying to fulfill his not so secret, secret quota, or actually has it in for you or your family, or for some reason is just really pissed off that day!
@@TNAROHfan I was driving a Lincoln in DC when I was in my early 20's. I was doing the speed limit on an entrance ramp to the loop. I had to floor it not to get run over! Glad I had a perfect 430 C.I. engine. Couldn't wait to getout of the DC area.
The driver has every right to grab his gun and defend himself - this is out of control tyranny and it’s just getting worse, when will citizens start defending themselves from these criminals with badges.
Defend yourself against a cop and you will probably die or at least spend years in prison and lose everything. What's worse public opinion and the media will destroy you. It all brainwashing.
You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to by police. Multiple courts have upheld this. If it's an illegal stop then take that up in court, but failure to comply will not do you any favors on the street, or in court. You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to do so by police. See SCOTUS ruling in Mimms vs PA. It applies to all occupants of the vehicle as well.
Total power trip. He could’ve easily avoided assaulting this man by simply taking 30 sec in explaining the reason for stopping him, but because he gets an ego boost from beating people up for “not complying” with his tyranny, he couldn’t 🤦♂️
You know it's personal, because instead of calling for backup, or following any other kind of procedure, he pulls the man's hair. Clearly he wants the yank him out of the car and beat the shit out of him.
At what point as a citizen, are we allowed to defend ourselves? This cop broke the law how many times and that's OK? no he should've been able to defend himself and at any point I'm sure he could've kicked the shit out of this cop but he didn't
5 min in and this troops is nuts, just starts reaching in to the car to unlock the door. for what? to drag the guy out and beat him for a traffic ticket. wtf is wrong with the police. they're mental.
The officer was 100% within the law. He does not have tell the person why he stopped them until they go to court or on the ticket. When the driver did not give him a driver’s license, the officer had his legal justification for the arrest . The man resisted arrest. Elbow strikes are legal in MMA in most circumstances and officer did it to overcome resistance and to keep the driver from driving away as they struggled. The officers actions were legally justified especially when the person told him he had a history of carrying weapons .
@@crjcrj8443 you're either a boot licker or plain wrong. Just because they CAN do something they should know better not to. This one used his EGO to show this old man who us the boss. I hope you get that too one day to realy appreciate the position he is in.
All the trauma that that officer is afflicting on the general citizen more than likely one day is going to get so depressed about what he's done that he is probably going to eat one of his hollow points from his service revolver it will be so sad. That state trooper needs psychiatric evaluation. I'm surprised he really didn't shoot the man,an murder him in broad daylight on camera
Never if the authorities get their way although this guy could have knocked that cop out and still got away with it because it was all on video! Just think about all the times it's not on video. And I hope this guy sues the hell out of that cop and the whole department! And those bystanders who helped hurt him!
Stop stop, stop rolling your windows all the way down on a traffic stop. A few inches is more than enough and keep your doors locked. And frankly, be ready to take off if need be. We need to be done with worthless lawsuits and take real action
Be ready to take off- that’s going to escalate it to a felony in many states even if the officer was wrong and allow for force such as PITT depending on the factors
There is no reason for this. He turns those berries & cherrys this cop should already have a reason why he is stopping the vehicle. They don’t tell you cause they have no reason. There looking to just id while they think of something. BS did not introduce him self. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸😡
I thank you for these police audits that show how violently our rights are being violated. THE PUBLIC IS OFENDED BY THE VIDEO COMERCIALS THAT SHOW VIOLENCE ON GAMING. WTF? WE ARE TRYING TO STOP VIOLENCE NOT PROMOTE THROUGH GAMING. Thank you for what you do, otherwise. PEACE AND LOVE ALWAYS.
No, he did not. He placed a condition on it. A condition not legally required of the officer . Big difference. What do you think was going to happen if the driver disagreed with the officer? Same result. There is a reason why the host just called the officer names instead of citing court cases of how the officer is legally wrong .
@@crjcrj8443 Just because you don't have to do something doesn't mean you shouldn't to avoid an escalation. Just tell the man why he's pulled over, but no the pig wanted a fight.
@@clintmatthews3500 Avoid an escalation? Are you kidding? She suspected him of being a man who just threatened people with gun. Escalating is just a buzz word to those who aren’t in that situation. It’s a two way street. By drawing on and covering an armed or suspected to be armed people , it lets them know they will lose and are more likely to surrender than chance beating the officer to the draw and killing them - which happens. And only happens less often because the vest is there - which even if the bullet hits the vest hits is like a sledgehammer and people can die from its blunt force trauma
@@crjcrj8443 She? Who is she? Who got drawn on in this video? The cop and some sycophant bystander just beat a guy up for asking a question before turning over a license. Where are you getting this other story from?
@@clintmatthews3500 My bad. I’m in two discussions. Got it mixed up. In this discussion I should have said . He is required to give the officer the drivers license. The officer is not required to tell why he wants it until they get to court . The driver escalated the encounter and lost. The officer was legally correct and in his guidelines. The driver escalated the situation twice in his refusal or his putting a condition on his compliance . A condition the officer does not have to grant . Then he resisted ( non-compliant ) with the arrest . That’s on the driver .
![ILLSLICK - WINTER IS COMING [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dwTMeM1zIhQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Shit like this has to STOP
This dirty cop need to be in prison fore abusing the law and abusing a citizen
In general population!
Needs a little more then that.
Yes fired and jail time ! That kind of she. It does not belong In a uniform !!
A perfect example of what a cop should never be.
To punish the oppressors of humanity is clemency. To forgive them his barbarity.- Maximilian Robespierre
If the citizen is going to help an officer arrest someone at that point the citizen should be held accountable as well as the officer if it is not a legal arrest.
Im sure they can be.
If citizen is helping a dirty cop that citizen is in collusion..correct?
@@Blue-hf7xt Snitch Pig Wannabe is his name but yes i'd go after him for corrupt involvement
I would think the citizen can be charged with assault regardless if they are helping an officer or not or it might be allowed if you are helping an officer.
@@stevehopkins2801 Assaul, harassment, + slander he was calling the victim names + interfering.
This tyrant needs to be fired and prosecuted to the fullest possible extent of the law. These tyrants have no place in law enforcement. He is angry and out of control. I hope this tyrant sued to the full extent of the law.
You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to do so by police. See SCOTUS ruling in Mimms vs PA. It applies to all occupants of the vehicle as well.
@@fennectempest1590 the guy commit no crime, the pig cannot force a person to exit the vehicle.
@@cronicleofadaytrader7105 guess what you have to fight it in court not on the side of the road and once he refuses to get out the car he broke the law
@@fennectempest1590 what law? please articulate?
@@cronicleofadaytrader7105 did you even look into mimms v PA or look up anything, are you just basking in ignorance?
The Supreme Court has ruled several times you have to exit you vehicle when asked if you've been pulled over.
IF YOU THINK IT'S UNCONSTITUTIONAL THEN TAKE IT UP IN COURT NOT ON THE STREET. Arguing doesn't help your case just makes it worse
I used to think, if I saw a cop on the side of the road struggling with a suspect, I'd stop and help the cop. Not any more.
it actually saddens me, but i agree with you.
Me too, but never will I now.
A few years ago in Chicago, people were intentionally hitting police on the side of the road as they pulled people over. Several state troopers were killed within a few months. I was tickled pink.
I'd be tempted to defend the victim.
@@howlinwulf Yeah, I'd hate to save the bastard and then be responsible for someone elses right's getting violated or worse. Best to let nature sort it out as intended.
"If you can't tell me why you pulled me over, I can only assume that *you don't have a lawful reason for pulling me over."*
The cop already called for back-up. All he had to do was wait. His ego got the better of him. He needs to lose his job and have a huge lawsuit filed against him, and also the ass clown who joined the assault. This is shameful.
At what point does this become a self defense situation? After the first elbow to the face? I hope this tyrant was fired and sued along with the person that helped with this assault.
I counted 9 elbow strikes the head. This cop had evil in his heart.
He will most likely receive "Officer of the Year" and a promotion.
Promoted
Id remember the criminal cops name and get even.
@@jonejo8578 No need for revenge, IT'LL def. get what's coming to IT !!!
If a grandmother said why did you stop me and wouldn’t get out this cop would give her elbow strikes to gain compliance . What a piece of excrement and a terrible human being.
It wasn't a grandmother it was an overgrown child playing the rebellious game and lost. Grown up don't act like this and if they do they get the elbow and zapped.
@@AmericanProud7 there is a video out there of a grandma getting tased. All because she wasn’t going to comply. You tase my grandma the worms will be eating good. It sounds like you think you know the law obviously, you don’t read and do research on your own. You are a asshat sir. A complete asshat!
@@AmericanProud7 another cock-sucking cop lover
You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to by police. Multiple courts have upheld this. If it's an illegal stop then take that up in court, but failure to comply will not do you any favors on the street, or in court. You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to do so by police. See SCOTUS ruling in Mimms vs PA. It applies to all occupants of the vehicle as well.
I would go to court and see it through and when all was said and done, regardless of the verdict, I’d pay this trooper a visit and even the score.
Sue the cops, the department and the bystander who stepped into the arrest. If you don't sue, tyrants win.
Sue him for what hurt feelings. He failed to produce his licence when requested. He resisted the police and he was subdued and arrested.
I'm not seeing the lawsuit
Even though it's our only recourse, the problem is, that the taxpayers still have to pay the price in taxes.
@@AmericanProud7 He showed hes license when he was asked about it. Did you even watch the video?
@@TheLoopuss he withheld the licence after being asked several times. The police are not obligated to tell you why before. He failed to comply with a lawful order and for that he got the mauling and cuffs. Moral of the story...... Don't play games
@@AmericanProud7 Reasonable articulable suspicion is what an officer needs to perform an “investigatory” stop which he didnt have obviously. Do you personally think he did a good job protecting and serving hes community? The guy cooperated but also stood up for hes rights, nothing more nothing less..
You are just a trol or a scum bag cop your self man 🤡 He has been taught to de-escalate the situation in the Academy which he he didnt do. He could have, if he stated the case why he pulled him over and needed hes driving license.
Cops always state the case when making a trafficking stop "the reasson i pulled you over is ..." and often then make up a lie. They have too.
He got charged with disordly conduct which is a missdemenor and the definition is "intentional disturbing of the PUBLIC PEACE and order by language or other conduct" which he didnt do. He maybe hurt the cops ego by not obey him like a sheep (like you would of done which is clear by your comments 🐑😂) but nothing more. Cops just need to learn how to do their job and be a decent human being and they would get some respect by the public and not just clowns like you.
Go blow a cop man 🤡🤡
This cop should be arrested immediately and fired!!!
Yep, they have no juristiction over the people who are using the roads for normal travel. They regulate COMMERCE.
This cop should get elbow too
@@bohydrus7108 that's just not true. but ok.
@@Blue-hf7xtthis is why every adress of police officers should be out there
Lmao 😂
I am so amazed at how calm and collective the driver is. Wow! He is so patient! His EQ/IQ shows.
After a long ten years of research and filing, he was given recoupment in the amount of $100,000,000.00 dollars for violations evident to all here today.
That copper is it disgusting human Being. And to make it even worse you will never even spend a minute in jail. He probably spent half of his life dreaming of doing this two people couldn't wait to become a cop so he could
He use to get beat up in school. I know that pig copper
@@tobythompson9495 Figures he looked rather wimpy trying to take down the individual coward type with no power in his strikes
From memory I think the dude was intoxicated, hence the arrest.
Normally I don't back the cops but in this case the drunk guy needed to be off the road.
He never stated why he pulled him over..he needs to be fired ..this is crazy
Fired hell; Assault and battery with intent to injure. Jail time!
Get back to work peasant.
That's what I said. Wtf
@@dankoston2904no no no. Short rope and a tall tree.
He will get a promotion
I can't believe how calm the guy was. I would have been fighting that trooper oh well.
We have the right to self defense doesn't matter if you're a cop or not.
@@Blue-hf7xtGod is a creation of USA and USA have created God for America citizens and white people's of USA🏳️🌈🏳️🌈❤ 🇺🇸 ❤🏳️🌈🏳️🌈🏳️🌈
@@thewesternworld9695You are wrong. Everything on earth is subject to God. Even a fag that raypes children.
@@Blue-hf7xtlol, Try it and see how it works out for you!
@@Blue-hf7xt Okay
This guy plead guilty to DUI and many other charges.
Why won't the officer tell the driver why he was stopped?
• He's gonna tell him at some point?
• Why is he treating it like a secret?
•What's the big deal?
Didn't have a legitimate reason ,trying to cover his a$$
E-G-O
bc he wanted to have the power of not answering him
@@markstone6263Bingo the power of having the information and to leave you hanging.
That's my biggest problem with cops not announcing the crime 1st above all else.
It's a ploy for cops to dig and find a problem. Then they throw out there I smell alcohol or weed.
This cop isn't very smart or never paid attention in class.
The whole ordeal is stupid to escalate this on a dangerous road without back up.
He broke many of his rights
Just like you said, they act that the citizen has no right to know the reason they were pulled over. That way if it's bogus they can make something up as we've seen on other videos.
The days of cops violating citizens rights are being exposed daily. Costing tax payer money to pay off citizens who were violated for no reason other than ego.
Absolutely unbelievable, nothing more than a criminal assault
That bystander has now played accessory to a criminal act. Share this video with those in his home town and watch how quick he has to move out.
Dumb comment
You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to by police. Multiple courts have upheld this. If it's an illegal stop then take that up in court, but failure to comply will not do you any favors on the street, or in court. You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to do so by police. See SCOTUS ruling in Mimms vs PA. It applies to all occupants of the vehicle as well.
@fennectempest1590 the way to counter Mimms v PA is if you can prove on video that you were of no threat to officer safety (ie., not armed, not belligerent). An officer can only lawfully demand you get out of he suspects you are a threat to his safety. If you can prove you're not a threat (ie, this video), it is an unlawful order that can be turned around as officer's excuse to escalate.
Once again the badge doesn't give you power it gives you responsibility. This officer needs to leave his feelings at home. Tell the guy what he did wrong, write him a citation if need be and go about your day. This is ridiculous. Prime example why the citizens dispise the police.
Say it, he needs to be fired
Handing your documents to the officer is a simple and requested everyday. If you don't You have escalated the situation.
You guys like the 4th Amendment about ID. However that does not apply to driving. You are required to present your license
@@AmericanProud7 sorry, but you are wrong.
@@AmericanProud7 That is the point, the police HAVE to identify the reason for stopping and explain the alleged crime committed. Probable cause established, they can ask for ID. Otherwise, they have no particular authority over a citizen. Their training strangely enforces the opposite. They try and control a situation by establish dominance, are barely polite on the verge on always being aggressive and think they are kind of above the law. They walk around like they own the place and treat everyone like thye are automatically guilty before they can be proved innocent. All while with our tax dollars. Their training has them on edge, wired to look out and be scared of the people they are serving. Even if the police get sued, the officers are barely affected. It'll be the tax payers ponying up again. They simply exchange offices. Deputy here, officer there, agent somewhere else but complains and trail of victims in his trail. If it actually catches up to them they are "offered" reignation.. with pension of course. All this officer had to do was let the guy know what reason he had to pull him over and he couldn't do that??!! remember the officer is on the clock. The guy being pulled over has no legal obligation towards professionalism while its mandatory for the Police.
@@naimanwar8113 point taken.. I'm not intimidated by the police. I'm polite they're polite. If they are a butt head I try and end the encounter as soon as possible.
Cops aren't always the brightest people. Some have skills and others are kinda dumb. I'm kinda smart and go on with my life without drama.
Crying about dumb cops is useless. Lots of good cops around
If I was him I would sue the shit out of the "citizen" that involved himself. 🤬
For simple traffic stops, officers should be required to first state why the officer has pulled an individual over prior to receiving insurance and a driver's license or immediately let the person go on their way.
My blood pressure just went through the roof watching that.
Same, infuriating and not the best watching before bed!!
This is the worst abuse of power I've ever seen in my life! I hope he sues!!
“Hey you wanna go in on the case and maybe split it?” Idk if he has the means. Some people could step up.
hundreds of these videos out there, lots worse than this one
@@randyfromthepeg4994 I agree but you've got to admit that this is pretty bad though..
should have been posted immediately after this happened, and the county police department office responsible for this , with their telephone number to put pressure on them to fire this dirty cop, yes and a lawsuit should have been filed
This guy is about clicks not change ... I say this because if it is change he wants he should link all the departments info.
The guy assisting that has been cop should be charged also for aiding an unlawful arrest and assault
The guy assisting doesn't have a clue. I personally would have assisted the officer also not knowing the situation. This officer is not suitable to be a police officer..
@@alan8887 Once he refused to exit the vehicle it became a lawful arrest, regardless of why he was stopped. You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to do so by police. See SCOTUS ruling in Mimms vs PA. It applies to all occupants of the vehicle as well.
@@alan8887 You should mind your own business.
@@covertyankee You are here on this discussion site and you ain't minding your own business are you? Quit being silly and rude.
@@alan8887 Go ahead and try to help law enforcement with an arrest and I hope you get sued into oblivion.
How terrible this is. What is happening to our Peace Officers? Dear God how awful.
Peace replaced with policy.
When Tyranny becomes Law Rebellion becomes Duty 🇺🇸 Thomas Jefferson 🇺🇸
Amen.
YEP...
Society needs to stand up and do the right thing.
Amen 🙏 brother.
Instead of helping the police we need to start helping the citizens.
@@davidbishop9067YES. I wouldn't piss on a pig if he or she was on fire.
That's a great idea Society standing up and doing the right thing but this country is sooo divided that would never happen 😢
it became a lawful arrest when he refused to get out of the car. You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to do so by police. See SCOTUS ruling in Mimms vs PA. It applies to all occupants of the vehicle as well.
This is a perfect example of someone who doesn't need to be a police officer or any position of authority.
One thing is for sure...Every situation will become worse the second a cops show up.
I do not believe every situation, there are a few respectful peace officers out there. For the most part you are correct. We still should have faith that they all are not bad. Negative energy brings negativity.
You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to by police. Multiple courts have upheld this. If it's an illegal stop then take that up in court, but failure to comply will not do you any favors on the street, or in court. You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to do so by police. See SCOTUS ruling in Mimms vs PA. It applies to all occupants of the vehicle as well.
These cops view citizens as objects and not neighbors or community.
That officer should be in prison. He's a total coward. Take that garbage off of him, and he's a nobody.
It became a game where the officer's ego got involved and he didn't want this man to "win." During most professionally done traffic stops, the first thing a cop does is identify themselves and state why they pulled you over. That's nearly universal.
Except cops are not legally required to tell you the reason for the stop. And neither are they legally required to voluntarily identify themselves. If you ask them to identify themselves, then they are legally required to provide that information. But they are not legally required to volunteer that information.
that said, it's a standard practice for cops to voluntarily identify themselves, and provide the reason for the stop before asking for ID, but it's not legally required...
You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to do so by police. See SCOTUS ruling in Mimms vs PA. It applies to all occupants of the vehicle as well.
Exactly
Common courtesy would require the officer to explain the reason for the stop. Otherwise there is no way for the driver to know whether it is a legal stop. And if it is not a legal stop then there is no legal tasering or use of force.
@@PeterWDunn-of5fs common courtesy is not law
You know, it definitely concerns me that "disorderly" and "lawful commands" are purely discretionary. This is a HUGE problem for American citizens.
How about this? Who gave that man impersonating law enforcement the authority to demand of another man anything if he did do anything to anyone else?
...didn't do anyth...
This happens daily
There was no probable cause
It is joy discretionary. It is clearly defined. Its just poorly misunderstood and misinterpreted
Thats at least a 100000 dollar lawsuit!
This man shows me such courage, such discipline and resilience. Let the tyrant distroy himself . Did this go to court? And what was the outcome ?
I catch at MF er off duty and totally f*** him up and the cop wannabe
it became a lawful arrest when he refused to get out of the car. You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to do so by police. See SCOTUS ruling in Mimms vs PA. It applies to all occupants of the vehicle as well.
@@fennectempest1590 Bullshit. Just because something is ruled as such by the SCOTUS doesn't make it right according to the Constitution's Bill of Rights. Remember it was SCOTUS that allowed the NFA of 1934, the GCA of 1968 and countless other violations of the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights and the 2nd Amendment in particular was created to arm and protect citizens from our own government. How does that Right stay in effect after the Government usurps control over which weapons, citizens are allowed to retain?
So he had every right to beat the shit out of him if he’s peacefully non compliant?
Its a youtube pro cop bot, theyre an army ran out of eglin air force base, same as reddit and instagram and facebook.
After he said he may havta shoot him, one of them asked if he had a gun, like they was looking for an excuse or way to justify shooting him. Smh
Police should be required by law to articulate the reason behind the stop. Then being able to just run your information before that is given, completely violates your Fourth amendment.
I agree, they should. But as it stands, they don't have to. Argue law in court, not on the side of the road. Change isn't going to happen unless we change legislation.
Look up Delaware v Prouse 1979.
"Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that police may not stop motorists without any reasonable suspicion to suspect crime or illegal activity to check their driver's license and auto registration."
@jonathantillian6528 However if they do have probable cause, they can ask for your ID without explaining every detail first. Not defending this cops actions.
@@SusieY-mn4oz...because you have a right to be secure in your persons, papers, and effects. The pig does have to state the purpose, and nature of the stop. Otherwise, they could just stop people to check their papers like the Nazi's did.
The other citizens got involved because they didn't know the full story " they just presumed that the trooper was right .🇬🇧😠
Follow up please! This guy should get millions. 🤞
When are we going to stop this behavior from cops
When adresses of officers are going public !
WHEN WE GET RID OF POLICE...UNTIL THEN , EXPECT MORE TYRANNY .
Micah Johnson tried
So long as u write comments in TH-cam bitch
I definately like to see a follow-up on this and I hope this brings a huge law suit for this brutality.
A lot of COPS are ex military, which means they are thugs who are used to using violence to impose their will on the dumbed down slave peasant sheeple of the world and of course its own slaves as well.. You suckers got conned and played. The Government never cared about you tax paying slaves they rule over. They just pretend to from time to time to save face. Now there is no need for most of us. So killing us would be a welcome policy if Biden decides to call anyone who resists him and his Demonic WOKE Democratic traitors who are owned by the Muslims and China.. America is dead and Communism is here to stay. Sorry but you all got conquered from within.
You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to do so by police. See SCOTUS ruling in Mimms vs PA. It applies to all occupants of the vehicle as well.
They have to have justification for the stop to tell you to get out of the vehicle
@@stephenwyatt3775 yeah but if they did is dissided in a court not in the street at the stop
NOT true, at all. The SCOTUS has ruled that even IF the stop were found to be unlawful, getting someone out of the car (ANYONE out of the car) is lawful per PA v Mimms. Know the law before you say something inaccurate.
Maybe Jamie Atkins is the D.A.?
"The most dangerous thing in life is an incompetent that has been given a gun and a law enforcement badge."
- Steven Magee
This police officer is really out of bounds. This is ridiculous.
You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to by police. Multiple courts have upheld this. If it's an illegal stop then take that up in court, but failure to comply will not do you any favors on the street, or in court.
You have a right to disobey unlawful commands, you have a right to protect yourself from tyranny.
@@AmbientShades The road is a public space. There is no law that states the police nor courts can dictate the free movement of anyone in public.
The one exception is when a crime is about, being or going to be committed. Stopping someone without any reasonable articulable suspicion is illegal, doing such with the threat of violence is unlawful.
A cop cannot command you unless you are about, being or in the process of committing a crime. That includes commanding people to get out of a car.
If there is such a rule, regulation, etc. it is unconstitutional, meaning it is conspiracy and treason.
Shadow courts and shadow police who are enforcing faux laws are threats to the nation and must be held accountable accordingly.
Or in simple terms. Police and courts are there to catch and process justice unto bad people, anyone who is not bad people should hardly realize police and courts exist in the first place.
@@theblueflame2221 Not according to SCOTUS, but good luck with that tough guy.
The way the other guy is mouthing back, i wouldnt be surprised if he isn't law enforcement or a mall cop
This cop must be judged and put in prison
Actually the cop is 100% within the law. He does not have tell someone why he pulled them over until court or on the ticket . The driver is required to give over the driver’s license. He refused . The officer arrested him and he resisted arrest. There is a reason the host of the video is just calling him names instead of citing laws and case law of how the officer was wrong . Why? Because the officers actions were correct under the law .
@@crjcrj8443 You are worse than the officer if you believe this, because you are saying it cold and calculated, whereas he acted in the heat of the moment....
111111
My blood is boiling right now! This tyrant needs to be charged and put in prison & that citizen needs to be charged as well.
He a state trooper too. Which he new better. So he made up charges to justify the arrest.. Now he got get the charges dropped.
Just because someone doesn't agree with you it doesn't mean you get to assault them.
This must be what our forefathers intended when they wrote our right to travel freely in the pursuit of life, liberty & the pursuit of happiness. Incidents like these is exactly why officers should not have immunity!
This a assault under cover of Authority. For what real reason.
DO YOU SEE THE DISCONNECTION BETWEEN CIVILIANS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT, THIS OFFICER NEEDS TO BE ARRESTED, FOR ASSAULT! THIS IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF TYRANTS BEING OUT OF CONTROL, THIS OFFICER VIOLATED THIS MAN'S CIVIL RIGHTS, BY NOT " IDENTIFING", AND NOT EXPRESSING "WHY I PULLED YOU OVER FOR" THIS IS BLATANT DISREGARD FOR THE MAN'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, I HOPE HE SUES THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, FOR VIOLATING AND ABUSING, ASSAULTING HIM!! THIS TYRANT NEEDS TO BE FIRED AND CHARGED CRIMINALLY, THIS MENTALITY MUST STOP " POLICE REFORM NOW" THIS MUST STOP IT IS CONTINUALLY HAPPENING THROUGHOUT AMERICA! LADIES AND GENTLEMEN PLEASE VOTE TO CHANGE LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING AND PSYCHOLOGICALLY EVALUATE EVERY OFFICER EVERY THREE YEARS TO SEE IF THEY " BECOME STRESSED OUT, UNFIT TO CONDUCT THEMSELVES IN A PROFESSIONAL MANNER! POLICE REFORM NOW!!!! THE DRIVER ASKED " WHO ARE YOU" AND WHY DID YOU PULL ME OVER WHICH ARE QUESTIONS THAT THE OFFICER " MUST ANSWER" DO YOU SEE THE DISCONNECTION! Remove qualified immunity for all public sector employees, the courts and eliminate public sector unions which are inherently unconstitutional
PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION Yes...I also think they need serious DRUG testing. He looked and acted like someone that is so roided up he can't think straight. Shirt was two sizes to small, Like who dresses that clown...Lawsuit for sure.
Fuck no. You're the idiot.
No one is reading your diatribe of all caps, dummy
It’s nuts man
We need to take law enforcement out of the governments hands! Privatize it so we have better control over it.
@@bertbeeler8333 that is the scariest and most insane idea I have ever heard of. Thankfully that will never ever, ever ever ever, going to happen snd for good reason.
Privatize the cops, he said!! 🤣
That cops lucky the guy wasn't violent cause he would've EASILY beat his ass. He was almost taking him without throwing anything offensive 😂
It's called holding our public officials accountable. We have every right to question them. They may not like it but they have been violating our rights for far to long. And now it to the point where they think they don't have to answer to anyone.
Cops like this one are bad ...
You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to by police. Multiple courts have upheld this. If it's an illegal stop then take that up in court, but failure to comply will not do you any favors on the street, or in court. You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to do so by police. See SCOTUS ruling in Mimms vs PA. It applies to all occupants of the vehicle as well.
I commute too and from work five days a week. When I see a cop, I do not feel safe and protected. Instead I feel anxiety and wonder too myself "what am I doing wrong?" that might attract his attention.
That is why I hate driving through certain municipalities or even certain stretches of the interstate. For example, there are certain places around St Louis, where adhering to the posted speed limit and driving responsibly in a non aggressive manner, will either put you at risk of being in an accident or being harassed by other drivers. Every time I feel like it is one of those nature documentaries where the water buffaloes are running and the lions are trying to pick them off. Do you risk getting run over, or risk potentially being singled out by the police? God forbid it's some tyrant who is trying to fulfill his not so secret, secret quota, or actually has it in for you or your family, or for some reason is just really pissed off that day!
@@TNAROHfan I was driving a Lincoln in DC when I was in my early 20's. I was doing the speed limit on an entrance ramp to the loop. I had to floor it not to get run over! Glad I had a perfect 430 C.I. engine. Couldn't wait to getout of the DC area.
Apparently your fear is legit. 😞
Don't be afraid be a man
Tased him.. how many times.!! The elbows to the face at LEAST 5xs.! There is no way this guy should still have a job as a officer after this here
What are they doing to this man you ask? Protecting and serving him to death, obviously.
The driver has every right to grab his gun and defend himself - this is out of control tyranny and it’s just getting worse, when will citizens start defending themselves from these criminals with badges.
He would have lost in court, the judge will side with the Officer. Now person has a case to send the Officer to prison for ten years!
Defend yourself against a cop and you will probably die or at least spend years in prison and lose everything. What's worse public opinion and the media will destroy you. It all brainwashing.
@@richardbland9079 The judge can't exactly side with anyone if they die for treason.
Because that would be instant death.
You won't survive to talk to a judge
Just get out and sue them personally
One of these days we’re going to see an uprise in vigilantism. These cops better be on their best behavior.
hopefully sooner than later
You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to by police. Multiple courts have upheld this. If it's an illegal stop then take that up in court, but failure to comply will not do you any favors on the street, or in court. You are required by law to exit the vehicle when ordered to do so by police. See SCOTUS ruling in Mimms vs PA. It applies to all occupants of the vehicle as well.
Sue the guy that helped he had no right and had no facts. He went hands on which is battery.
Total power trip. He could’ve easily avoided assaulting this man by simply taking 30 sec in explaining the reason for stopping him, but because he gets an ego boost from beating people up for “not complying” with his tyranny, he couldn’t 🤦♂️
TAKE THAT PIG'S BADGE!!!
I hope that he sued the shyt out of these pigs and everyone of them needs to be fired then put in jail.
You know it's personal, because instead of calling for backup, or following any other kind of procedure, he pulls the man's hair. Clearly he wants the yank him out of the car and beat the shit out of him.
Should of had that window up with door locked. Asked all the right questions. Rookie
At what point as a citizen, are we allowed to defend ourselves? This cop broke the law how many times and that's OK? no he should've been able to defend himself and at any point I'm sure he could've kicked the shit out of this cop but he didn't
5 min in and this troops is nuts, just starts reaching in to the car to unlock the door. for what? to drag the guy out and beat him for a traffic ticket. wtf is wrong with the police. they're mental.
Wow, why couldn't he just tell him the nature of the stop.... clearly didn't have one and escalating to the point to assult him.
I hope there is a lawyer willing to take this evidence to federal court.
@@jeepwj it shud have...
The officer was 100% within the law. He does not have tell the person why he stopped them until they go to court or on the ticket. When the driver did not give him a driver’s license, the officer had his legal justification for the arrest . The man resisted arrest. Elbow strikes are legal in MMA in most circumstances and officer did it to overcome resistance and to keep the driver from driving away as they struggled. The officers actions were legally justified especially when the person told him he had a history of carrying weapons .
@@crjcrj8443 you're either a boot licker or plain wrong. Just because they CAN do something they should know better not to. This one used his EGO to show this old man who us the boss. I hope you get that too one day to realy appreciate the position he is in.
@@crjcrj8443 Slurp, slurp !!!
@@crjcrj8443 Swallow the boot jackass.
ohhh what a hero cop . should be locked up
Policing at its finest yet again !
I really would love to know what happened with this officer. He should be arrested what a bully.
a man has the right to defend him himself with deadly force in this case. this is pure and simple evil.
The cop is a criminal
All the trauma that that officer is afflicting on the general citizen more than likely one day is going to get so depressed about what he's done that he is probably going to eat one of his hollow points from his service revolver it will be so sad. That state trooper needs psychiatric evaluation. I'm surprised he really didn't shoot the man,an murder him in broad daylight on camera
....and tested for steroid abuse
No he won't. They hire psychopaths
I'd watch and clap 👏 I wish more would do this commemorative act
The fact he elbowed him local to his carotid artery, could cause immediate death... WOW
I love how there's people out there that will blindly help them
This is a major lawsuit! Somebody help that man get some money as its the only comsolation of cons quence that comes out of taxpayers pocket
Tell me this cop is fired charged jailed sue them all
The cops loved ones must be made aware of his behavior. Godspeed!
Wife and kids probably know all too well.
@@clintmatthews3500. They’re probably abused at home.
I really hope cop is charged with felonious assault n fired
At what point are you lawfully allowed to defend yourself?
Never if the authorities get their way although this guy could have knocked that cop out and still got away with it because it was all on video! Just think about all the times it's not on video. And I hope this guy sues the hell out of that cop and the whole department! And those bystanders who helped hurt him!
Stop stop, stop rolling your windows all the way down on a traffic stop. A few inches is more than enough and keep your doors locked. And frankly, be ready to take off if need be. We need to be done with worthless lawsuits and take real action
@@moses7874 Micah Johnson did
Be ready to take off- that’s going to escalate it to a felony in many states even if the officer was wrong and allow for force such as PITT depending on the factors
12:00 I’m shaking with anger. WE NEED CHANGE🤬
One of these days the trooper is going pull over the wrong person and get his head blown off.👈🏾
And they wonder why they are hated and people shoot them. They make snakes look tall
And we're supposed to be all sad when it happens. Nope. Payback can be a bitch
There is no reason for this. He turns those berries & cherrys this cop should already have a reason why he is stopping the vehicle. They don’t tell you cause they have no reason. There looking to just id while they think of something. BS did not introduce him self. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸😡
I would attempt to sue the public people that stopped also since they want to involve themselves like that.
This Man's Hero and this Tryant WILL be in Prison for this.
In Finland we have this saying...there's still room for pig's behind the sauna 😅
Cops EARN THE HATE
Wouldn’t spit on the cop if he was on FIRE 🔥 🤷🏾♂️
He needs to sue the guy also, that just came by to help this cop beat him up.
law makers felt its reasonable to beat and jail someone over a traffic offense.
Sue them and make sure of the stipulation that this cop can never represent the law again
I thank you for these police audits that show how violently our rights are being violated. THE PUBLIC IS OFENDED BY THE VIDEO COMERCIALS THAT SHOW VIOLENCE ON GAMING. WTF? WE ARE TRYING TO STOP VIOLENCE NOT PROMOTE THROUGH GAMING. Thank you for what you do, otherwise. PEACE AND LOVE ALWAYS.
The man offered him the license, but the cop had long since lost control of his faculties.
No, he did not. He placed a condition on it. A condition not legally required of the officer . Big difference. What do you think was going to happen if the driver disagreed with the officer? Same result. There is a reason why the host just called the officer names instead of citing court cases of how the officer is legally wrong .
@@crjcrj8443 Just because you don't have to do something doesn't mean you shouldn't to avoid an escalation. Just tell the man why he's pulled over, but no the pig wanted a fight.
@@clintmatthews3500
Avoid an escalation? Are you kidding? She suspected him of being a man who just threatened people with gun. Escalating is just a buzz word to those who aren’t in that situation. It’s a two way street. By drawing on and covering an armed or suspected to be armed people , it lets them know they will lose and are more likely to surrender than chance beating the officer to the draw and killing them - which happens. And only happens less often because the vest is there - which even if the bullet hits the vest hits is like a sledgehammer and people can die from its blunt force trauma
@@crjcrj8443 She? Who is she? Who got drawn on in this video? The cop and some sycophant bystander just beat a guy up for asking a question before turning over a license. Where are you getting this other story from?
@@clintmatthews3500
My bad. I’m in two discussions. Got it mixed up.
In this discussion I should have said . He is required to give the officer the drivers license. The officer is not required to tell why he wants it until they get to court . The driver escalated the encounter and lost. The officer was legally correct and in his guidelines. The driver escalated the situation twice in his refusal or his putting a condition on his compliance . A condition the officer does not have to grant . Then he resisted ( non-compliant ) with the arrest . That’s on the driver .
Good morning chille!