@@wfels Hey no I didn't - want to ride that fine line between showing my progress and keeping some things locked as a competitive advantage, some sharing can definitely be an disadvantage in the game of elite sports. Will share as much as I feel good with 💪🏼🙏
I did the same test when I was 30 years old and also when I was 50. I had the same good result. 50 is the New 30! 😂 lol.. correct traning over the years pay off! You will reach your goals!👍
Surprised to see VO2 test done first. How long did it take to flush all that lactate out and reach the base level again for finding LT1? 167 HR for LT1 is just mad 🤪. Hope that you will still listen to your body when starting to train according to these new results, so that not overdoing it.
@@user-rl3ef4ju9k Not sure about time exactly but started again at resting lactate value. Got a good team now, so overdoing not really possible anymore, long-term consistency view 🤙🏼🆙
As the exercise physiologist responsible for planning&executing these tests I have some comments. First, yes you can see studies using both orders (VO2max first then thresholds and vice versa). I prefer doing the VO2max test first, as there are studies indicating that VO2max can be compromised by a long submaximal step test prior to the VO2max test (increased core temperature, glycogen depletion, other possible contributing fatigue mechanisms). The VO2max protocol itself is fairly short (~10min), and we use an individualised (~15-30min) recovery period before the submaximal test. We monitor both blood lactate and HR to ensure that we are back to baseline levels before starting the submaximal step test.
Everything moving in the right direction.
Well done.
Awesome work, thanks for sharing so openly, looking forward to the next video.
Amazing Matti! Kemp It up 🎉
Thanks for sharing this and congrats for these improvements! Did you mention your Vo2max result from the test and how did it compare to former tests?
@@wfels Hey no I didn't - want to ride that fine line between showing my progress and keeping some things locked as a competitive advantage, some sharing can definitely be an disadvantage in the game of elite sports. Will share as much as I feel good with 💪🏼🙏
Hahahahha, for all finnish speakers - there’s a little joke included😂
I did the same test when I was 30 years old and also when I was 50. I had the same good result. 50 is the New 30! 😂 lol.. correct traning over the years pay off! You will reach your goals!👍
@@lonelyrider606 I believe you, the age is really just in peoples mind, cool to hear you feel so fit and strong, keep it going 70 is the new 50 🤙🏼🙏
💪💪
Surprised to see VO2 test done first. How long did it take to flush all that lactate out and reach the base level again for finding LT1? 167 HR for LT1 is just mad 🤪. Hope that you will still listen to your body when starting to train according to these new results, so that not overdoing it.
@@user-rl3ef4ju9k Not sure about time exactly but started again at resting lactate value. Got a good team now, so overdoing not really possible anymore, long-term consistency view 🤙🏼🆙
VO2 test first does seem unconventional. Fatigue and some residual fatigue metabolites could affect lactate thresholds
As the exercise physiologist responsible for planning&executing these tests I have some comments. First, yes you can see studies using both orders (VO2max first then thresholds and vice versa). I prefer doing the VO2max test first, as there are studies indicating that VO2max can be compromised by a long submaximal step test prior to the VO2max test (increased core temperature, glycogen depletion, other possible contributing fatigue mechanisms). The VO2max protocol itself is fairly short (~10min), and we use an individualised (~15-30min) recovery period before the submaximal test. We monitor both blood lactate and HR to ensure that we are back to baseline levels before starting the submaximal step test.