Hey man! There are definitely a ton of great shots in this one and yes for all the car photos, keep taking them ahah! Love the shots at 2:35, definitely a great composition with a bunch of cool lines. Well done!
The colours are just beautiful! They definitely remind me of 80s/90s family photos, especially when underexposed a bit. But I would also agree that this film stock could need a bit more light depending on the scene. thanks for sharing Reimann!
2:36, 4:27 and 6:30 are easily my favorites personally, the level of grunge hits particularly hard and makes this feel like a photo from a different era much more than usual. great video as always! personally i'd definitely use this film stock a ton but that's just because of my weird preferences lol also 3:03 GT-R!!
Glad you liked the photos! I definitely want to try to shoot this film at 200 iso and see what I get! I bet the grungy look would be perfect with a little more light! And yes! That GT-R has been there for at least a year. I’ve got two pics of it now lol
Lovely results! Th blue hour shot at 5:17 is 💙 I also found that the film needs more light Will rate it at 200 next time unless I’m going for crushed darks 😂
Hello how's you bud? Nice vid and shots, love the architecture and cars, that motor biker lovely shot! Think I'll grab a roll of this, people here in uk saying it's best rated at 100. Film stocks prices here skyrocketed again... keep up the good work sir.
I’m doing well! Hope you’re doing the same Ian! I wouldn’t doubt that it performs the best at 100 iso. I’m not sure if I’m going to rate the next roll I get at 100 or 200🤔
Thanks for the video. To call this stuff grainy is an understatement. Also, the dynamic range is very poor for a negative film. You have to wonder what Lomo is going for with this.
Thanks for watching! It is definitely very grainy at 400. More than I was expecting. I think this film would perform considerably better at 200! I can’t wait to try another roll and see how it does with more light!
Quick tip from the hot humid south. You probably already know this. If your gear is cold from being inside an air conditioned space, put it in a zip lock bag and set it outside in a protected place like a garage until it reaches outdoor temp and it will be less likely to fog up.
Picked up a canon P...who do u recommend for a CLA? any idea good place to get body n lens caps? Have a Canon 50mm f2.2...have a filtershows 40mm...thx always great video, keep em coming!
You could try rjrepairs on Instagram! I hear they do great work in terms of CLAs! For body caps and lens caps, you might just have to keep your eyes peeled on eBay
@ I need to do some more testing with Color ‘92. It’s difficult with these new films that they are continuously refining because the results will vary depending on the batch any given roll was a part of. I wonder if it would benefit from extra developing time.
Saw your Japanese summilox video with the canon lens and came to watch your latest! Wasn't aware of this film stock - thanks for sharing your thoughts on it! Btw I make short moves. Just filmed one following the journey of an aspiring painter in Sweden. I'd be really grateful if you could stop by Reimann thank you! :)
I don’t see myself buying this again especially over ultramax at the same price range tbh. I was shooting 92 in pretty high contrast environment (forest hike) and it did very poorly. It either blew out the highlights (sky) or completely crushed the shadows. Both ultramax and especially Porta 400 did WAY better. I did a few street shots too and those also turned out kind of underexposed with blown out highlights. Idk I’ll stick to hp5 for the cheap medium speed stuff
@@KaptainKerl it’s definitely not a very flexible film. I’m hoping films like this and Harmann Phoenix are refined over time to have better overall performance!
What are your thoughts on this new film stock? What would you use it for? COMMENT BELOW⬇️
The way this film stock captures blues in the natural light is stunning. I'd shoot people with it or try it with landscape. ✨
@@ArchiesLens it’s very unique! I would be interested to try it for landscapes
@@ReimannPembroke totally!
Hey man! There are definitely a ton of great shots in this one and yes for all the car photos, keep taking them ahah! Love the shots at 2:35, definitely a great composition with a bunch of cool lines. Well done!
Thanks so much! Glad you enjoyed the video and the photos!
The colours are just beautiful! They definitely remind me of 80s/90s family photos, especially when underexposed a bit. But I would also agree that this film stock could need a bit more light depending on the scene.
thanks for sharing Reimann!
Thanks for watching! Glad you enjoy the look! I’m excited to shoot another roll! This time at 200 iso
2:36, 4:27 and 6:30 are easily my favorites personally, the level of grunge hits particularly hard and makes this feel like a photo from a different era much more than usual. great video as always! personally i'd definitely use this film stock a ton but that's just because of my weird preferences lol
also 3:03 GT-R!!
Glad you liked the photos! I definitely want to try to shoot this film at 200 iso and see what I get! I bet the grungy look would be perfect with a little more light! And yes! That GT-R has been there for at least a year. I’ve got two pics of it now lol
so you also got a preproduction role. 👌Also really interesting how the film stock looks in your style. 5:02 is really really good.
I did! And thank you man! I really like that photo too!
Lovely results! Th blue hour shot at 5:17 is 💙
I also found that the film needs more light
Will rate it at 200 next time unless I’m going for crushed darks 😂
Thanks for watching Bon! Glad I’m not the only one who experienced this😂
definately has a muted/grungy look to it
2:27, 2:37 were some dope compositions of the cars! & loved the color of 4:52
Hey thanks for watching! Glad you liked some of the photos!
Great vid man! Love the town topic photo.
Thanks for watching! Glad you liked that photo! That might be one for the portfolio
I have a roll in my camera right now. Thanks for the tip I will give the second half of the roll some more light! Keep up the great work!
Glad you saw my video before you finished the roll! Thanks for watching!
Hello how's you bud? Nice vid and shots, love the architecture and cars, that motor biker lovely shot!
Think I'll grab a roll of this, people here in uk saying it's best rated at 100.
Film stocks prices here skyrocketed again... keep up the good work sir.
I’m doing well! Hope you’re doing the same Ian! I wouldn’t doubt that it performs the best at 100 iso. I’m not sure if I’m going to rate the next roll I get at 100 or 200🤔
@@ReimannPembroke I'm plodding on as we say... looking forward to seeing your results at 100 or 200
Cheers Mister
Nice! Thanks for sharing! Looking forward to shooting this stuff.
Thanks for watching! I hope you enjoy the results you get!
nice video. this film looks promising.
Thanks for watching! I can’t wait to try it again!
I'd like to see you shoot another role because I'm confused whether you need to push it or not.
I’d like to shoot another roll too! Next time I’ll rate it at 200
Thanks for the video. To call this stuff grainy is an understatement. Also, the dynamic range is very poor for a negative film. You have to wonder what Lomo is going for with this.
Thanks for watching! It is definitely very grainy at 400. More than I was expecting. I think this film would perform considerably better at 200! I can’t wait to try another roll and see how it does with more light!
Quick tip from the hot humid south. You probably already know this. If your gear is cold from being inside an air conditioned space, put it in a zip lock bag and set it outside in a protected place like a garage until it reaches outdoor temp and it will be less likely to fog up.
@@bencompson oooh this is helpful! Thank you!
Picked up a canon P...who do u recommend for a CLA? any idea good place to get body n lens caps? Have a Canon 50mm f2.2...have a filtershows 40mm...thx always great video, keep em coming!
You could try rjrepairs on Instagram! I hear they do great work in terms of CLAs! For body caps and lens caps, you might just have to keep your eyes peeled on eBay
Is it possible your light meter might be off? With all those under exposures.
@@ihatesjws669 I doubt it because I never have problems with other film
@ReimannPembroke I have undeveloped color 92, now I'm curious to see if I have same results. Nikon FE 50mm 1.4 ais lens
@ I need to do some more testing with Color ‘92. It’s difficult with these new films that they are continuously refining because the results will vary depending on the batch any given roll was a part of. I wonder if it would benefit from extra developing time.
Saw your Japanese summilox video with the canon lens and came to watch your latest! Wasn't aware of this film stock - thanks for sharing your thoughts on it! Btw I make short moves. Just filmed one following the journey of an aspiring painter in Sweden. I'd be really grateful if you could stop by Reimann thank you! :)
Glad I made you aware of this new film! Oh awesome! Where are you located?
I've been based out of Texas but moving to NYC in october!@@ReimannPembroke
I don’t see myself buying this again especially over ultramax at the same price range tbh. I was shooting 92 in pretty high contrast environment (forest hike) and it did very poorly. It either blew out the highlights (sky) or completely crushed the shadows. Both ultramax and especially Porta 400 did WAY better. I did a few street shots too and those also turned out kind of underexposed with blown out highlights. Idk I’ll stick to hp5 for the cheap medium speed stuff
@@KaptainKerl it’s definitely not a very flexible film. I’m hoping films like this and Harmann Phoenix are refined over time to have better overall performance!