A lot of words about other words. Very interesting to listen to. We all have to find our own way. Stuart said he found it plausible but did not believe it. Who did not believe it? Why didn't he/it believe it? What would make him/it believe it? He mentioned third party evidence, what/who is this third party? That is not clear to me. Thank you to the speakers, organizers, and audience. Especially for providing this online.
Listening to this conversation - I can't help but feel like I am watching observations of another solar system being attempted with a little magnifying glass made for tightening the screws on eye glasses. Everyone who seems to exist is equally expert concerning this subject...degreed or not.
The "entrance of the Sacred Feminine" might have been meant as an lighthearted explanation but there is a special kind of feeling such as the lady in the audience picked up on and mentioned that pretty well fits with that.
The Self needs basic characterization. It's existence and properties are yet only vaguely implied by science. It should probably be determined if it is in any way measurable, and if it is acted on by any physical forces. Big question to me is if it is a product of biological consciousness. How could it be acted upon to evolve? It is omnipresent and the foundation of the universe, the spirit of nature.
Doctors should know that awareness doesnt equal responsiveness. Together they describe consciousness a duality of being and basic level / layer and filter on interpretation. Today's level of technology can validate spirituality.
IMO the Self did not evolve out of this Universe. This physical dimension creates nothing it is a manifestation from the true Reality - Self/Brahman is all there really is. Don't get fooled by your senses
this whole is One. the past of the talk, the moment i write, the moment you read, each one of us is our own big bang,our self consciousness dies at death, our group mind is our happening,or is happening, or happening. our group mind evolves..happens,..is..is sacred, wounded, "eternel" time eats i his children,,mama Rhea..rea..thingness saves us. oneness in multiplicity is restored.
@@AndreasDelleske an electron can behave as a field? some posit there is just one electron. Or : There are 25/27 ( some not large number in the higher twenties) electron fields - ( Dyson) If i understood what i was reading which i possibly didnt. My point of view seeks congruency in macro and micro phenomenon. not all points congruent but the congruency of greater and lesser wholes. An electron being a tiny whole. Material temporality being an illusion of matter.
@@libmitchell6371 Try this maybe www.reddit.com/r/ParticlePhysics/comments/d3ulf1/what_is_an_electron_field_and_how_does_it_work/ - matter is a useful concept four our realm of possibilities with a human body but it can be disputed in other realms, Some say, there is only consciousness and I would say along the way of discovering things there are only structures, numerical relations - but on the other hand that is only how WE humans must see it because we can't grasp complex structures we focus on the most simple ones. Du you know the Schrödinger equation? Basically every "object" can and must be expressed as a Schrödiger equation, at least that is a very popular interpretation nowadays (I might get details worng). And the equation sums up energy from minus infinite to plus infinite in space, and that is what we call a field, more or less.
@@AndreasDelleske we material hence linear are structures to our own perception - the numerical relations interply interplay process - like the movement revealed in/by water vapour clouds - which are visually structures, aka numerically measurable flows. FIeld oceanic around our material planet - an illusion from solar band 563 where the mists and condensations of universal movement are apparent matter - a slowed down flow. Human mind cannot escape witness even when admitting witness and witnessed are one or not separate except from a half pied perspective.
@@AndreasDelleske thank you for link. i saw a program about the concentration of matter after the big bang, in bubble like spaces with concatenations of tiny bubbles around big bubbles - just as on soapy dishes... The spaces get bigger and bigger by absorbing others, the tiny bubbles get denser and denser then pop out of existence into the big bubble space. form is emptiness, emtiness is form. electron and field are differently measureable functions of the one inner chi. " this sweet and seeing ball which but one prick makes no eye at all" witness and field of witnessable phenomena are one. THis is it. TIme to go outside and experience the delicious field awareness here where humanity fights and ignores/ swims in and celebrates the physical world as well as the thought electron bliss being seeing. pop! another one bites the dust...the mountain is the body of buddha - is it always a pity to say so?
love these talks.Im a Buddhist,love learning about the different opinions of the mind
same
A lot of words about other words. Very interesting to listen to. We all have to find our own way.
Stuart said he found it plausible but did not believe it. Who did not believe it? Why didn't he/it believe it? What would make him/it believe it? He mentioned third party evidence, what/who is this third party? That is not clear to me.
Thank you to the speakers, organizers, and audience. Especially for providing this online.
THE QUESTION OF ''SELF'' seems to me wrongly asked, self is a phenomenon of consciousness, and should be understood as such !
Well said!
Is there a close caption version or file available? Kinda hard of hearing.
Amazing! Soon we shall all wake up to this collective dream💓
Agreed, even now two years later, what a great shift we are all experiencing. So glad to be alive at this time to witness amazing changes.
@greenthumb8266 thank you for remembering 🙏
Excellent.... thanks 🙏.
This was intellectually stimulating
See Alan Watts lecture on the creation of doer of deeds being just a figure of speech
Listening to this conversation - I can't help but feel like I am watching observations of another solar system being attempted with a little magnifying glass made for tightening the screws on eye glasses. Everyone who seems to exist is equally expert concerning this subject...degreed or not.
The "entrance of the Sacred Feminine" might have been meant as an lighthearted explanation but there is a special kind of feeling such as the lady in the audience picked up on and mentioned that pretty well fits with that.
What's the first guy mean there's an appropriate selection that's adaptive or non-adaptive?
1:00 The topic of evolutionary origins
Great talk
Wow finally academics are taking quantum physics seriously and relating it to our experience in the now
that which is aware is the same as the thing it is aware of
In order to detect sameness you need difference somewhere :)
Music to my ears...🎼🎵🎶🎸
The Self needs basic characterization. It's existence and properties are yet only vaguely implied by science. It should probably be determined if it is in any way measurable, and if it is acted on by any physical forces. Big question to me is if it is a product of biological consciousness. How could it be acted upon to evolve? It is omnipresent and the foundation of the universe, the spirit of nature.
Doctors should know that awareness doesnt equal responsiveness. Together they describe consciousness a duality of being and basic level / layer and filter on interpretation. Today's level of technology can validate spirituality.
Before DNA?
mRNA :)
Super erklärt :))) vielen herzlichen Dank!
Wenn Du nicht verwirrt bist hast Du’s nicht verstanden :)
@@AndreasDelleske ich hab nicht gesagt, dass ich es verstanden habe - aber er hat es gut erklärt ;)))
@@andreamuller8468 Sehr gut. Man darf nicht zuviel verstehen :-)
IMO the Self did not evolve out of this Universe. This physical dimension creates nothing it is a manifestation from the true Reality - Self/Brahman is all there really is. Don't get fooled by your senses
I love how Matthew Fox is hanging out here and ask the question about the soul or if it is just a washed up term.
Wow💓
this whole is One. the past of the talk, the moment i write, the moment you read, each one of us is our own big bang,our self consciousness dies at death, our group mind is our happening,or is happening, or happening. our group mind evolves..happens,..is..is sacred, wounded, "eternel" time eats i
his children,,mama Rhea..rea..thingness saves us. oneness in multiplicity is restored.
When the caveman defeated the tiger with his club did he feel the sense of the conqueror?
One imagines relief as the first sense...
If you aren’t confused, you didn’t get it :)
an electron is a field
Yes and no..
@@AndreasDelleske an electron can behave as a field? some posit there is just one electron. Or : There are 25/27 ( some not large number in the higher twenties) electron fields - ( Dyson) If i understood what i was reading which i possibly didnt.
My point of view seeks congruency in macro and micro phenomenon. not all points congruent but the congruency of greater and lesser wholes. An electron being a tiny whole. Material temporality being an illusion of matter.
@@libmitchell6371 Try this maybe www.reddit.com/r/ParticlePhysics/comments/d3ulf1/what_is_an_electron_field_and_how_does_it_work/ - matter is a useful concept four our realm of possibilities with a human body but it can be disputed in other realms, Some say, there is only consciousness and I would say along the way of discovering things there are only structures, numerical relations - but on the other hand that is only how WE humans must see it because we can't grasp complex structures we focus on the most simple ones.
Du you know the Schrödinger equation? Basically every "object" can and must be expressed as a Schrödiger equation, at least that is a very popular interpretation nowadays (I might get details worng). And the equation sums up energy from minus infinite to plus infinite in space, and that is what we call a field, more or less.
@@AndreasDelleske we material hence linear are structures to our own perception - the numerical relations interply interplay process - like the movement revealed in/by water vapour clouds - which are visually structures, aka numerically measurable flows. FIeld oceanic around our material planet - an illusion from solar band 563 where the mists and condensations of universal movement are apparent matter - a slowed down flow.
Human mind cannot escape witness even when admitting witness and witnessed are one or not separate except from a half pied perspective.
@@AndreasDelleske thank you for link. i saw a program about the concentration of matter after the big bang, in bubble like spaces with concatenations of tiny bubbles around big bubbles - just as on soapy dishes... The spaces get bigger and bigger by absorbing others, the tiny bubbles get denser and denser then pop out of existence into the big bubble space. form is emptiness, emtiness is form. electron and field are differently measureable functions of the one inner chi.
" this sweet and seeing ball which but one prick makes no eye at all"
witness and field of witnessable phenomena are one.
THis is it.
TIme to go outside and experience the delicious field awareness here where humanity fights and ignores/ swims in and celebrates the physical world as well as the thought electron bliss being seeing.
pop! another one bites the dust...the mountain is the body of buddha - is it always a pity to say so?
the doing is the happening
evolution, lol.....
The soul of man is such a deep subject of such complexities