US Navy FFG(X) Frigate at SAS2018 : FREMM, AUSTAL Frigate, F100, Mk110, L3 ALAMO, Lacroix Sylena
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 เม.ย. 2018
- Focus on FFG(X) future frigate program at Sea Air Space 2018 with coverage of:
- Fincantieri Marine Group FREMM frigate
- Austal frigate
- Navantia F100 frigate
- BAE Systems Mk110
- L3 ALAMO
- Lacroix decoy launcher
![[ไฮไลต์] แบดมินตันหญิง "เมย์ รัชนก" ไทย vs เบลเยี่ยม รอบแบ่งกลุ่ม | โอลิมปิก 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/qfMROCoiKMY/mqdefault.jpg)
...I wish our country's navy would have either FREMM or Navantia Frigates with 76mm main gun and at least 24 VLS...
Well all you Armchair Admirals, times really are changing. Fincantiari gets the gig. Why? Well it’s a totally different approach. American builders will now have to think outside the square. It’s not a bad thing, it just progress.
Danger-close doesn't mean the enemy is close to you. It means you'll be dropping ordinance close to your own dudes.
Now that the US NAVY has new frigate where can I buy the replaced ones? This would make an excellent luxury cruiser for my company.
they must choose the huntington designs the US National Security Cutter Bertholf Class because it has Good Sea Capabilities and firepower or either F100
And the winner is... FREMM
To me, the choice should be the F100 of the Spanish and Australian Navies, and/or the Huntington-Ingalls design. I hope they don't chose either failed LCS-variants.They have only 16-VLS cells instead of 32 or 48-cell VLS of other frigates.
We should be building more ship yards for the future
There's no market for alum ships
USA knows F100 vey well and how good they are, I think this will be the option.
One can't be very confident with ones service and product when one refuse to talk to the press about it...
Say what you want about frigates, NOTHING beats the DDGs of the US NAVY.
Very simple ship .
When did BAE bought Bofors?
It appears to me that the F100 would be the best design for the U.S. Navy. The last thing the Navy should do is build its new frigate around the failed Littoral Combat Ship (LCS)! Both variants of the LCS are experiencing significant problems, to the point that most of the ships are not even deployable. Moreover, they are not suited to operate in a high conflict environment. Yes, the LCS’ are fast, light and very maneuverable. But all of those features have been met by sacrificing the one critical element that every warship needs - survivability. The LCS’ could not even withstand fire from a .50 caliber gun! They are also too lightly armed, so they do not have an effective offensive punch.
Im from Turkiye and i hope someday we can build as f 100 frigate. Its the best warship and i love it
Can the Mark 110 penetrate a submarine's hull over a medium distance? These guns must be able to penetrate the steel of a surfacing submarine if to save a missile!!
I'm impressed that all the European salesmen speak English. How many American salesmen can speak a second language?
I do not like the fact that this design does not include a bulbous bow. That means in heavy sea states it will be less stable. The crew isn't going to like it either. Also it needs to have more fuel capacity.
USA future frigate program is using a 57mm.