For all you naysayers you need to watch the reconstruction documentary and realize the effort gone into the remake of the original ballet choreography and design. It's fascinating. Who cares if it's 100 years old. It's a brilliant achievement. Those that only see the negative don't see the contribution to the artistic process and historical research that this groundbreaking "thing" did for dance, theatre, design, etc. etc.
Eric Gibson yeah I'm a little confused by the comments here how people are looking at it as old as if it is annoying and should be put away. When this was debuted in 1987 when it was reconstructed it became the yardstick by which creative choreography this is not old. This is original this is a game changer from 1913
I thoroughly enjoy this version, especially if it IS the original one. It is great to see exactly what was experience that opening night. I in the hinterlands do not mind seeing history performed even if it is over a hundred years old. Very powerful and moving performance.
Stravinsky en cada obra suya se muestra original, es como Picaso que en cada obra es como un nuevo estilo.En su estreno el público no entendió su grandeza,pero Cocteau dijo lo siguiente:Es una sinfonía que evoca las cermonias salvajes y los dolores de parto de la tierra´melodías que parecen surgir del mundo ancestral y de cataclismos profundos., no es nada bucólico ni de pájaros que es lo que el público quizás esperaba,son las fuerzas tellúricaas ,la fuerza de una semilla que puede horadar la piedra..Es de una gran fuerza y riqueza de ritmos y de una gran combinación de los instrumentos de percusión, que le dan una atmósfera de primitivismo barbáro,de ritmos paganos en que la magíay la muerte propicianla eterna renovación de la naturaleza.RENOVARSE O MORIR, evolucionar para sobrevivir de jfa.
Christian Mendoza Tapia this is one of my favorite parts that very spot not just because of the Rival tribes but Stravinsky has used wood winds in such a whirling way it sounds like a crazy circus.. when you think about it Stravinsky composed so many ballets in this ballet it's like 11 different pieces. Amazing. oh I just realized you said you didn't like the choreography. what kind of choreography would you rather see to The Rite of Spring
É linda a harmonia entre o que é proposto como inovação por Stravinsky , uma novidade e, o que há de tradição e de antigo, em uma sociedade onde coexistem diferenças que valorizam-se mutuamente. Segundo o blog do maestro explica, do maestro doutorado em música erudita, Ricardo Rocha, esta apresentação naturalmente não é exatamente igual a que foi apresentada pela primeira (em 1913??) que na época foi bastante polêmica. Mas uma boa obra e um grande profissional, sempre deixa seu nome e seu legado para a eternidade. É importante ressaltar que um país que valoriza a cultura e a educação, tem como IDH uma importância de maior destaque no mundo. Parabéns ao conjunto da obra apresentada.
What instrument did start the Rite of Spring? 1:51 What instrument is playing the main melody/role at this moment? 3:12 What brass instrument is playing the main melody/role at this moment? What moment did the dancers start dancing? 5:31 What instrument is playing the main melody at this moment? 7:06 What percussion instrument did have the main role at this moment? 9-10 Describe the music and the dance.
We watched this in my mythology class. It seems out of place, unless you can understand the archetypes it follows. This ballet tells a story rooted in myth. Of course, this piece was hated so much that there were riots. a beautiful story non the less.
the sstory of a ritual from pagan russia: to redeem themselves in the eyes of the gods of spring, they sacrificed one virgin girl to the gods; they watched as she danced herself to death. every spring.
the piece more or less was tolerated in 1913 france, it was the choreography that did it. stravinsky was already a god in the eyes of the classical music public. well maybe not a god but a towering figure. you can hear his neo classical voice in the score, intense as it is. he peered over the edge of traditional art forms. nijinsky, however, jumped over the edge with this coreography
The audience was expecting beautiful elegance .. and what they got was savages / traditional realism ; the dancers had to ' un-learn ' traditional ballet for the choreography ...
Also apparently the performance was during a heat wave in summer and no air conditioning at that time in the theater ... may have added to the tempers of the audience ...
This is a serious scary ballet. Human sacrifice. Disney in Fantasia depicted a T Rex clawing the guts out of a Stegasauraus. What was google thinking by putting a kiddie ad in front of it?
@ovrava If you hadn't found this yet, a documentary... (th-cam.com/video/l8TQH-5Vrhk/w-d-xo.html) It shows just how lucky we are that fate allowed us to see it once again.
ovrava yes I I know in great detail how it was reconstructed and there are a few documentaries on my channel and I had the Good Fortune of communicating with Hodson and Archer and recently put together a little documentary explaining this ancient Pagan ritual so feel free to email me or contact me through TH-cam if
deep bluehue yes a lot of it was from sketches from Stravinsky's notes and from Marie Rambert who was nijinsky's assistant during the choreography. She was still alive and was able to work with Hodson and Archer in great detail if it weren't for her I don't think this would exist
If you've seen the Marinsky, then watch the Joffery. There is more urgency, a much more grounded performance, and Beatriz Rodriguez is the better Chosen One. And, yes, it helps that the Joffrey is in better focus.
Beatriz Rodriguez in the Joffrey is the best by far. She captures the horror and insanity of the Rite as the Chosen One should, not as a too-graceful ballerina play-acting the role as in the Russian performances. Remember, Nijinsky intended this as the ultimate anti-classical-ballet, with every balletic tradition stomped into the ground, literally. Feet in first position? Pigeon-toes! Graceful arms? Frantic flailing and twitching! And imagine the effect on the dancers as they had to confront a dancer's greatest fears by constantly falling and even miming injury. Diabolical and brilliant.
Hm. I think the Mariinsky is pretty bad. They do through the motions. Except for Daria Pavlenko: killer Chosen One. But watch the Joffrey. It's older, it was the 1st performance since 1913 and it electric. This is sort of cold and distant like we Russians are.
Bonsoir ou bonjour mais sachez que je dois regarder cette vidéo pour mon cours de musique au collège et sa casse un peu les couilles vous pouvez pas interdire cette vidéo au moins de 18 ans ?
Leave it up to the Mariinski to turn even the Rite into a piece out of the museum... As if that wasn't the problem with ballett already, that the russian companies cling too faithfully to 150 year old choreographies.
I'd like to hear you develop on the "too faithfully" part. Personally I find the original to be the version with the most most overlapping qualities with the music, as in it fits the best with the emotional impact. I find the newer choreography's a bit too obvious in what they try to portray and that the gestures have less synchronicity with the music and doesn't match the emotional impact as well as the original with its more primitive and alien (as in indigenous/foreign/unknown) style.
This is the performance given at the théâtre des champs élysées in Paris for the 100th anniversary of the theater and of the ballet; the program included the original version of the ballet and in a second part a modern choreography by Sacha Waltz. The version you see here is the result of researches by Millicent Hodson and Kenneth Archer in 1987 to present the original choreography of the ballet, it is stupid to accuse the "Mariinski to turn even the Rite into a piece out of the museum"; the purpose of the evening was a commemoration of one of the major artistic world events of the XXth century and of the building of a theater which acoustics are probably one the best in Paris and probably in France and a real architectural "tour de force" at that time when one is aware that the whole building inside and outside is made of concrete. So before giving judgments find the right information.
I think I know what Quotenwagnerianer means about the "museum" thing. They are going through the motions. Pavlenko is great but I have a "Rival Tribes" video in here comparing Mariinsky to Joffrey. There is no comparison. The Joffrey has the "Nijinsky Inheritance" whether 1987 or 2009 or 2013...I have seen this Company involve themselves in Le Sacre - not perform but involve - with 3 different ensembles and it is organically the Joffrey's. The Russians lack the ability to abandon steps. They even stroll off to sidestage in "Spring Rounds" like no one can see them. So...hopefully dude meant that the Mariinsky was boring Russian apathy. BUt I think he is just not informed because the Russians did not cling to this, that's for sure. They hold their freaking Nutcracker in high esteem though.
" ...They even stroll off to sidestage in "Spring Rounds" like no one can see them...." The problem here is that the stage opening viewed from the public is 11.68m wide which compares to the Opera Garnier's 16m !!! Add to this the wings at Opera Garnier are 16m wide on each side while the TCE's have only 5m on each side approximately (I have the official plan of the theater on my drive) so it makes a huge difference; moreover the impression depends of the place where the camera is set in the auditorium as well as the focal length used for the shot which modifies greatly the perspective. From a spectator point of view there are a significant number of seats in the stalls where you can see only part of the stage they are on each side .if you're seated at the 3rd row the extreme 5 seats on each side have a partial view of the stage overture. I'm lucky to possess the map of the auditorium with the seats numbered so when I choose a seat I know exactly which numbers I should not accept!
Lots of “no” from me, here... Fantasia was my intro to the Rite of Spring, so I can admit my first exposure may have painted the lens with which I see this. My second exposure was a video of the Nijinsky performance, and I must say, watching the Adoration of the Earth with dancers certainly makes this piece more sense than with volcanoes bursting in time. It was probably the only part I really liked; the rest of the dance seemed rather disconnected with the music, and the Disney imagination of the piece was better IMO. For the Glorification of the Chosen One section, it seems like a whole lot of nothing is happening; the T-Rex Stegosaurus scene was better. I definitely feel I prefer the full performance, rather than Disney’s abridged re-arrangement. Some important music was cut out. If a Disney crew could take the old footage and make it fit (adding more) with Stravinsky’s original it would be great. This performance was awful IMO. Compared with a performance I saw years earlier, all the dancers seem out of sync in this recording. If the music seemed disconnected then, it’s completely disconnected now. The dancers aren’t moving together, some moving in time, others moving as an afterthought. I guess it’s hard to find dancers with a sense of time. What’s with the conductor? Is he suffering from Parkinson’s or something? I find it hard to keep up with this flailing hand. Yearning for a better Disney version aside, judging this performance for what it is, I’d have to give it a 6... maybe a 5. The music is wonderful and I can’t say it’s a bad performance. In itself, the music is a high 8 or 9. Some articulation isn’t clear IMO. But as a whole, the dancers just ruin it, making the musical performance a waste. The performers aren’t “with it.” They seem so... late... It looks as if they failed to gather for the final note in the piece, as if they meant to all be together for the last shot, but they somehow didn’t make it. I’ve seen better IMO.
So annoying the dubbing in ugly German at the end of the Ballet! Aaaaagh! 100th Anniversary. So, 2013. The première of Le sacre du printemps took place on March 29, 1913, with the famous riots. Which orchestra is this? Who is the 1st bassoon? Who is the solo dancer at the last dance (Sacrificial Dance). Thanks!
Dear Antonia Tejeda Barros, sorry for the ugly language, but ARTE is a German-French program so there was that kind of translation. When u live abroad your own language doesn’t sound so ‚ugly‘ anymore... I love Sacre du Printemps BTW
I can not believe this choreography is over a century old. it's so modern!
It's almost as though they had a word for it 100 years ago: modernism.
For all you naysayers you need to watch the reconstruction documentary and realize the effort gone into the remake of the original ballet choreography and design. It's fascinating. Who cares if it's 100 years old. It's a brilliant achievement. Those that only see the negative don't see the contribution to the artistic process and historical research that this groundbreaking "thing" did for dance, theatre, design, etc. etc.
Eric Gibson yeah I'm a little confused by the comments here how people are looking at it as old as if it is annoying and should be put away. When this was debuted in 1987 when it was reconstructed it became the yardstick by which creative choreography this is not old. This is original this is a game changer from 1913
Where can be seen this documentary ? Any link ? Thanks 😊
AMEN
Link
@Arturo Major you guys know EVERYONE knows ur a bot right..
16 years of hard work,reconstructing the lost original choreography.
❤❤❤from 🇷🇸
Goosebumps 😯
Beautiful, provoking, elegant, and brilliant!
I find this piece and choreography deeply moving. It's eerie and utterly beautiful at the same time, and it touches something deep inside me.
It is an intense masterpiece that heals the thirst and lament of the Human Soul. Standing Ovationaly ‼️ Bravo❗
Amazing story bringing us the echoes from our deepest collective uncounsciuos!
I thoroughly enjoy this version, especially if it IS the original one. It is great to see exactly what was experience that opening night. I in the hinterlands do not mind seeing history performed even if it is over a hundred years old. Very powerful and moving performance.
I hope you don't mean the original as in the (filming). Ha. This is as close as it will get with this incredible company, and orchestra.
Wonderful, absolutely brilliant, stunning!!!
Thanx for posting
Stravinsky en cada obra suya se muestra original, es como Picaso que en cada obra es como un nuevo estilo.En su estreno el público no entendió su grandeza,pero Cocteau dijo lo siguiente:Es una sinfonía que evoca las cermonias salvajes y los dolores de parto de la tierra´melodías que parecen surgir del mundo ancestral y de cataclismos profundos., no es nada bucólico ni de pájaros que es lo que el público quizás esperaba,son las fuerzas tellúricaas ,la fuerza de una semilla que puede horadar la piedra..Es de una gran fuerza y riqueza de ritmos y de una gran combinación de los instrumentos de percusión, que le dan una atmósfera de primitivismo barbáro,de ritmos paganos en que la magíay la muerte propicianla eterna renovación de la naturaleza.RENOVARSE O MORIR, evolucionar para sobrevivir de jfa.
idk if its the camera angle, music, or choreography, but 6:39 never fails to make me smile. it always makes my day.
Christian Mendoza Tapia this is one of my favorite parts that very spot not just because of the Rival tribes but Stravinsky has used wood winds in such a whirling way it sounds like a crazy circus.. when you think about it Stravinsky composed so many ballets in this ballet it's like 11 different pieces. Amazing. oh I just realized you said you didn't like the choreography. what kind of choreography would you rather see to The Rite of Spring
É linda a harmonia entre o que é proposto como inovação por Stravinsky , uma novidade e, o que há de tradição e de antigo, em uma sociedade onde coexistem diferenças que valorizam-se mutuamente. Segundo o blog do maestro explica, do maestro doutorado em música erudita, Ricardo Rocha, esta apresentação naturalmente não é exatamente igual a que foi apresentada pela primeira (em 1913??) que na época foi bastante polêmica. Mas uma boa obra e um grande profissional, sempre deixa seu nome e seu legado para a eternidade. É importante ressaltar que um país que valoriza a cultura e a educação, tem como IDH uma importância de maior destaque no mundo. Parabéns ao conjunto da obra apresentada.
Wow! 👏👏👏👏👏👏
Like 794, very good video. Thank you. Done, you have a new supporter.
Nijinsky was a genius. The ballet choreography could be dated 2019.
Why are you insulting Nijinksy like that?
Je pense de même !!!!! Nijinski is really a genius , who have created dance of the twentieth and then for later !!!!! ❤️💐 !!!!!
Upload this in better quality for us poor people.
Adoro ver con cuanto amor cuanto respeto la interpretan los musicos y bailarines ojala lo vea en el cielo el gran Nijinsky adorado
마린스키 봄의 제전 (1913 니진스키 버전) -
11:20~13:00(1분 40초)
22:30~24:00(1분 30초)
32:40~34:20(약 2분)
So powerful !
What instrument did start the Rite of Spring?
1:51 What instrument is playing the main melody/role at this moment?
3:12 What brass instrument is playing the main melody/role at this moment?
What moment did the dancers start dancing?
5:31 What instrument is playing the main melody at this moment?
7:06 What percussion instrument did have the main role at this moment?
9-10 Describe the music and the dance.
¿Al final sí conseguiste quien te hiciera la tarea?
Hahaha
We watched this in my mythology class. It seems out of place, unless you can understand the archetypes it follows. This ballet tells a story rooted in myth. Of course, this piece was hated so much that there were riots. a beautiful story non the less.
what story exactly?
the sstory of a ritual from pagan russia: to redeem themselves in the eyes of the gods of spring, they sacrificed one virgin girl to the gods; they watched as she danced herself to death. every spring.
the piece more or less was tolerated in 1913 france, it was the choreography that did it. stravinsky was already a god in the eyes of the classical music public. well maybe not a god but a towering figure. you can hear his neo classical voice in the score, intense as it is. he peered over the edge of traditional art forms. nijinsky, however, jumped over the edge with this coreography
The audience was expecting beautiful elegance .. and what they got was savages / traditional realism ; the dancers had to ' un-learn ' traditional ballet for the choreography ...
Also apparently the performance was during a heat wave in summer and no air conditioning at that time in the theater ... may have added to the tempers of the audience ...
5:58 always is unnerving to me.
oh look, I won't sleep tonight now
By the stream quality of the footage, this is from 1913 too.
La versione originale è di una bellezza unica , estasiato.
This is a serious scary ballet. Human sacrifice. Disney in Fantasia depicted a T Rex clawing the guts out of a Stegasauraus. What was google thinking by putting a kiddie ad in front of it?
Because it's the most important piece of music of the XXth century and one of the most important work of the music history.
Lady Exorcist 美人だね‼️元気かな❓Ravishing and luscious ❗Vigorous❓
WOW... this is ART
is there any way to find this video but in better quality?
th-cam.com/video/h-3wI3Upvpw/w-d-xo.html
Metal!
Hello,
this seems to be the original choreography from 1913. Does anyone know how it got transcripted? (was it written down?)
@ovrava If you hadn't found this yet, a documentary... (th-cam.com/video/l8TQH-5Vrhk/w-d-xo.html) It shows just how lucky we are that fate allowed us to see it once again.
Mostly from sketches drawn ...
ovrava yes I I know in great detail how it was reconstructed and there are a few documentaries on my channel and I had the Good Fortune of communicating with Hodson and Archer and recently put together a little documentary explaining this ancient Pagan ritual so feel free to email me or contact me through TH-cam if
deep bluehue yes a lot of it was from sketches from Stravinsky's notes and from Marie Rambert who was nijinsky's assistant during the choreography. She was still alive and was able to work with Hodson and Archer in great detail if it weren't for her I don't think this would exist
could not be better
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
I feel a little bit like I'm watching "Midsommar" movie. I am quite sure the film screenwriter had to see this balet.
I DIDNT KNOW ANYONE ELSE FELT THIS WAY FFF
Impresiona el impacto escénico y sonoro...abrumador.
niceee
Just exhilarating like...lightning
...and thunder
Igor Stravinsky. Act I from Le Sacre du Printemps (The Rite of Spring). 1913. (ballet excerpt)
3:53
3:15 That moment sounds like Jupiter from The Planets; I wonder if Holst was inspired by this
クマの被り物が可愛い
Who is the actress of 23.42??
I feel genuine fear for the Chosen One
Überirdisch!
brilliant as fuck!
時々観に来る。
春の祭典はニジインスキー版の為に書かれて、ニジインスキーもそれに応えた。
奇異に見える振り付けも動きも春を待ち望む古代の人々の熱狂と狂気の様をよく表してると思う。
A young Gergiev.
Mariinski here offers a total deconstruction of the expected: Petitpas routed by the Primitive!
The mid roll ads on this video are in THE WORST spots - always right before a dramatic transition, and it keeps taking me out of this piece 😖😖
If you've seen the Marinsky, then watch the Joffery. There is more urgency, a much more grounded performance,
and Beatriz Rodriguez is the better Chosen One. And, yes, it helps that the Joffrey is in better focus.
Beatriz Rodriguez in the Joffrey is the best by far. She captures the horror and insanity of the Rite as the Chosen One should, not as a too-graceful ballerina play-acting the role as in the Russian performances. Remember, Nijinsky intended this as the ultimate anti-classical-ballet, with every balletic tradition stomped into the ground, literally. Feet in first position? Pigeon-toes! Graceful arms? Frantic flailing and twitching! And imagine the effect on the dancers as they had to confront a dancer's greatest fears by constantly falling and even miming injury. Diabolical and brilliant.
This is what the fuss was all about: the real deal. But how did the 'Handmaids' get in there!?
ok ok bebe
Качество съемки тоже родом из 1913 года что ли?
briats!
Is Martha Gram dancing here?
Michiko Momochi 美人だね‼️元気かな❓Ravishing and luscious ！ vigorous？
小島信一 oh ok thanks!
Who is ‘Martha Gram’ supposed to be ?
Too bad I can't hear it with unspoiled ears the audience had 100 years ago!!!😢😢😢
0:36
are the end failed ?
bertrand russel no
No
Hm. I think the Mariinsky is pretty bad. They do through the motions. Except for Daria Pavlenko: killer Chosen One. But watch the Joffrey. It's older, it was the 1st performance since 1913 and it electric. This is sort of cold and distant like we Russians are.
agreed. But be less sarcastic.
Logorrheic I am kind of curious what you're talking about I don't get it
Fatova Mingus 美人だね‼️元気かな❓Ravishing and luscious ！ vigorous？
Gergiev's finger wiggling intensifies.
Bonsoir ou bonjour mais sachez que je dois regarder cette vidéo pour mon cours de musique au collège et sa casse un peu les couilles vous pouvez pas interdire cette vidéo au moins de 18 ans ?
staf
Leave it up to the Mariinski to turn even the Rite into a piece out of the museum...
As if that wasn't the problem with ballett already, that the russian companies cling too faithfully to 150 year old choreographies.
Also...I can't think of any greater ballet to cling to because of the history which is mythical really.
I'd like to hear you develop on the "too faithfully" part. Personally I find the original to be the version with the most most overlapping qualities with the music, as in it fits the best with the emotional impact. I find the newer choreography's a bit too obvious in what they try to portray and that the gestures have less synchronicity with the music and doesn't match the emotional impact as well as the original with its more primitive and alien (as in indigenous/foreign/unknown) style.
This is the performance given at the théâtre des champs élysées in Paris for the 100th anniversary of the theater and of the ballet; the program included the original version of the ballet and in a second part a modern choreography by Sacha Waltz. The version you see here is the result of researches by Millicent Hodson and Kenneth Archer in 1987 to present the original choreography of the ballet, it is stupid to accuse the "Mariinski to turn even the Rite into a piece out of the museum"; the purpose of the evening was a commemoration of one of the major artistic world events of the XXth century and of the building of a theater which acoustics are probably one the best in Paris and probably in France and a real architectural "tour de force" at that time when one is aware that the whole building inside and outside is made of concrete. So before giving judgments find the right information.
I think I know what Quotenwagnerianer means about the "museum" thing. They are going through the motions. Pavlenko is great but I have a "Rival Tribes" video in here comparing Mariinsky to Joffrey. There is no comparison. The Joffrey has the "Nijinsky Inheritance" whether 1987 or 2009 or 2013...I have seen this Company involve themselves in Le Sacre - not perform but involve - with 3 different ensembles and it is organically the Joffrey's. The Russians lack the ability to abandon steps. They even stroll off to sidestage in "Spring Rounds" like no one can see them. So...hopefully dude meant that the Mariinsky was boring Russian apathy. BUt I think he is just not informed because the Russians did not cling to this, that's for sure. They hold their freaking Nutcracker in high esteem though.
" ...They even stroll off to sidestage in "Spring Rounds" like no one can see them...." The problem here is that the stage opening viewed from the public is 11.68m wide which compares to the Opera Garnier's 16m !!! Add to this the wings at Opera Garnier are 16m wide on each side while the TCE's have only 5m on each side approximately (I have the official plan of the theater on my drive) so it makes a huge difference; moreover the impression depends of the place where the camera is set in the auditorium as well as the focal length used for the shot which modifies greatly the perspective. From a spectator point of view there are a significant number of seats in the stalls where you can see only part of the stage they are on each side .if you're seated at the 3rd row the extreme 5 seats on each side have a partial view of the stage overture. I'm lucky to possess the map of the auditorium with the seats numbered so when I choose a seat I know exactly which numbers I should not accept!
Lots of “no” from me, here...
Fantasia was my intro to the Rite of Spring, so I can admit my first exposure may have painted the lens with which I see this.
My second exposure was a video of the Nijinsky performance, and I must say, watching the Adoration of the Earth with dancers certainly makes this piece more sense than with volcanoes bursting in time. It was probably the only part I really liked; the rest of the dance seemed rather disconnected with the music, and the Disney imagination of the piece was better IMO. For the Glorification of the Chosen One section, it seems like a whole lot of nothing is happening; the T-Rex Stegosaurus scene was better.
I definitely feel I prefer the full performance, rather than Disney’s abridged re-arrangement. Some important music was cut out. If a Disney crew could take the old footage and make it fit (adding more) with Stravinsky’s original it would be great.
This performance was awful IMO. Compared with a performance I saw years earlier, all the dancers seem out of sync in this recording. If the music seemed disconnected then, it’s completely disconnected now. The dancers aren’t moving together, some moving in time, others moving as an afterthought. I guess it’s hard to find dancers with a sense of time.
What’s with the conductor? Is he suffering from Parkinson’s or something? I find it hard to keep up with this flailing hand.
Yearning for a better Disney version aside, judging this performance for what it is, I’d have to give it a 6... maybe a 5. The music is wonderful and I can’t say it’s a bad performance. In itself, the music is a high 8 or 9. Some articulation isn’t clear IMO. But as a whole, the dancers just ruin it, making the musical performance a waste. The performers aren’t “with it.” They seem so... late... It looks as if they failed to gather for the final note in the piece, as if they meant to all be together for the last shot, but they somehow didn’t make it.
I’ve seen better IMO.
So annoying the dubbing in ugly German at the end of the Ballet! Aaaaagh! 100th Anniversary. So, 2013. The première of Le sacre du printemps took place on March 29, 1913, with the famous riots. Which orchestra is this? Who is the 1st bassoon? Who is the solo dancer at the last dance (Sacrificial Dance). Thanks!
Dear Antonia Tejeda Barros, sorry for the ugly language, but ARTE is a German-French program so there was that kind of translation. When u live abroad your own language doesn’t sound so ‚ugly‘ anymore... I love Sacre du Printemps BTW
Horrible video quality, so blurry that it is unwatchable.
Beginning of decay.
It's a shame the Mariisnky got to dance this.
Their lifeless interpretation is so disappointing.
that statement is idiotic
« Idiotic » is quite an understatement.