You guys have been productive, first Canon, now Fuji video produced on the same "vacation". You're worth every penny DPR is paying you. When I see "shot on the reviewed system", I get comfortable in my chair and start watching closely, love it! Would love a little insert or CC channel to see the lens used for each scene for your videos that aren't shot with a single lens.
Chris Niccolls? More like Crisp Niccolls. Is it me or the GFX100 footage looks crisper and sharper (not in an unpleasing way) than with Jordan's usual setup?
Personally I'd prefer the 45-100mm and the 30mm 3.5 - the 32-64mm is a great lens but I don't really use the wide angle as much. So for me I'd make more sense to have a longer zoom and the wider prime.
Hmm, I'm intrigued. I've got a 35-70mm kit lens, but I'm toying with doing the 45-100mm and this 30mm as a nice combo. Reading between the lines though, and it doesn't sound like this 30mm offers much more than a zoom, and has flare issues. I'm sure it's sharp, but maybe I'll just keep and use my 35-70mm at smaller apertures for landscapes, then get the 45mm as a more all-around faster option, and add an 80mm or 110mm for portraits. I can't complain about the 35-70mm that's for sure.
I often hike with my 50S + GF23 but for longer hikes I often opt for the GF50 because it's so compact and lightweight. The GF30 could be just what I need. Fuji is putting out small primes to allow photographers to use medium format where hard or close to impossible before. In the day to day real life usability trumps specialized needs and a small, slow lens comes with you when the "sexy" big, fast lens stays at home.
love the video shot at 3:29min that is a ridiculously sharp image for 100meg medium format and the tracking shot @ 1:05 cant see any problems with rolling shutter. I have the S1H and I love the Vid res but I miss my Nikon 800 for photo Res
Yes just got it and love it on the 100 where IBIS allows hand held shooting with this lens at fairly low shutter speed. For landscape photography this with the 45-100 may be a minimal (light!?) kit that could work.
Assuming you mean what I think you mean by sensor reflections, then the lens does play a part, as it has to reflect them back again (or you wouldn't see them). This is why having a filter on the front of a camera for night shots usually causes problems, as bright lights in/near the shot reflect back so well from its flat inside surface (usually as a green blob). www.dpreview.com/forums/post/63666503
Can someone explain the reason for having a medium format vs full-frame camera? It seems to me that there's no benifit to the gfx line as their lenses are all darker than what's available for ff, so the equivalent noise and dof would be exactly the same.
GFX owner here, did you figure out a way to switch selected faces in focus whilst using the EVF? The manual could have been an extra 300 pages long, it would not have hurt. Also, have you figured out how to rate images without going deep down in the menus? The button combo stated in the manual does not seem to work with the new firmware. Thank you!
GFX is the start to bringing medium format to the masses. Well photo enthusiast masses. Yes it's still 10k but not even a decade ago this would cost you a GTR.
I do NOT like zooms, the one you mention weighs 875 grammes and are 116mm long cost $2300, the 30mm weighs 508 grammes and are 99mm long cost $1700, so the 30mm lens have a superior images quality, handles easier and are cheaper, THAT´s what I like about prime lenses, you do NOT need all that bungee jumping lenses, 2 or 3 prime lenses and you can do nearly all kind of photography !
That is a bad strategy from Fuji. As you correctly mentioned while Fuji film has 32-64mm F4 while needs 30mm F4? I hope Fujifilm will wake up and make more bright lenses in that way they can beat FF world ;)
Someone sold me his GFX 50R for 2300€ and im happy with the Camera. Its little slow to work with, but the Pictures look nice. I dont understand why fuji isnt bringing faster aperture lenses. at the moment i adopt sigma art lenses and get really nice bokeh. The Pictures of this 30mm 3.5 lens look good, but they dont look like u have taken them with a 10000dollar camera to me...
I want to see a 135mm F1.8 for this camera with the same sharpness as the Sony. It's also worth noting that the Panasonic S1R body is light and compact compared with this one. Cost is the only thing that would deter me from buying a medium format camera.
at the moment? MF gear has ALWAYS demanded a premium because of all the glass having to cover larger sensors, and now at that resolution. Come to think of it, $1700 is a steal if you make comparisons to other MF... and some FF mirrorless with half the resolution power. It actually makes More sense rather than none.
If you consider that fuji will sell less of them because medium format is expensive, and that it has to cover more then full frame and resolve 100 megapixel, I think you are getting a reasonable deal(Especially because a comparable hasselblad lens costs twice as much, and a schneider phase one four times as much.)
With the current lens options, Fuji GFX bodies makes no sense. A typical Sony/Canon Full frame will give better results for literally half the price of the set up. Heck, even Fuji's own XT30 crop sensor will give better results just because the variety of lens you got there.
@@problemat1que in price to performance ratio. And most of the factors you just mentioned CAN be corrected in post processing. It's totally a preference thing if you wanna go spend double the budget on a marginally "better" camera system. Fujis cant be Hasselblads. Period.
@@problemat1que people who seek "evidences" in TH-cam comment sections for some opinion which is true but sounds no melodious to their years and think of themselves as pros by grabbing a higher end costly camera to be better at photography, and do not have counter logic to their arguments. 😂😂
Me (does not and likely will never own a medium format Fujifilm camera): "DP review released a review for a new GFX lens?! I'll watch it!"
Bryan Schultz yup, I’m still using a Nikon D200 and 300 lol
You guys have been productive, first Canon, now Fuji video produced on the same "vacation". You're worth every penny DPR is paying you. When I see "shot on the reviewed system", I get comfortable in my chair and start watching closely, love it! Would love a little insert or CC channel to see the lens used for each scene for your videos that aren't shot with a single lens.
Love how the color and tone of the stills and video look identical
Man, this camera can capture so much detail, it's ridiculous. I'm always impressed with it.
1:12 Jordan, I think you should have a holiday again, without bringing your work lol
I think he probably gets more fun from shots like 6:00 than a day on the beach??? I would...
Jordan i know you love you s1h but man this gfx 100 footage is amazing can you just start shooting everything with this?
The dynamic range of that big sensor is just awsom!
Some Visual Artifact at 1:37. Is that True?
Yeah, probably some wongky stuff happening during editing
Yup
Chris Niccolls? More like Crisp Niccolls. Is it me or the GFX100 footage looks crisper and sharper (not in an unpleasing way) than with Jordan's usual setup?
The video coming out of the GFX 100 is insane... I own one, and it almost feel surreal
The video looks so so good.
4:35
Thanks again guys. Still need to try out medium format cameras...
Sequence at 1:05 is absolutely epic.
yeah, some of Jordan's B-rolls should be called AAA-rolls
Is is a little choppy (no ND filter) or is that a youtube artifact?
It is an epic shot actually shot by my youngest son. He was our drone op that day.
Personally I'd prefer the 45-100mm and the 30mm 3.5 - the 32-64mm is a great lens but I don't really use the wide angle as much. So for me I'd make more sense to have a longer zoom and the wider prime.
Hmm, I'm intrigued. I've got a 35-70mm kit lens, but I'm toying with doing the 45-100mm and this 30mm as a nice combo. Reading between the lines though, and it doesn't sound like this 30mm offers much more than a zoom, and has flare issues. I'm sure it's sharp, but maybe I'll just keep and use my 35-70mm at smaller apertures for landscapes, then get the 45mm as a more all-around faster option, and add an 80mm or 110mm for portraits. I can't complain about the 35-70mm that's for sure.
I often hike with my 50S + GF23 but for longer hikes I often opt for the GF50 because it's so compact and lightweight. The GF30 could be just what I need. Fuji is putting out small primes to allow photographers to use medium format where hard or close to impossible before. In the day to day real life usability trumps specialized needs and a small, slow lens comes with you when the "sexy" big, fast lens stays at home.
Are the videos color graded? I find the episodes shot on Fuji look so much better. And this one with the GFX it looks so detailed and sharp.
love the video shot at 3:29min that is a ridiculously sharp image for 100meg medium format and the tracking shot @ 1:05 cant see any problems with rolling shutter. I have the S1H and I love the Vid res but I miss my Nikon 800 for photo Res
THIS IS BEAUTIFUL.
Yes just got it and love it on the 100 where IBIS allows hand held shooting with this lens at fairly low shutter speed. For landscape photography this with the 45-100 may be a minimal (light!?) kit that could work.
Amazing footage one of the best iv seen on this channel.
0:23 that little throw scares me 😬😬😬
Assuming you mean what I think you mean by sensor reflections, then the lens does play a part, as it has to reflect them back again (or you wouldn't see them). This is why having a filter on the front of a camera for night shots usually causes problems, as bright lights in/near the shot reflect back so well from its flat inside surface (usually as a green blob).
www.dpreview.com/forums/post/63666503
Unpopular opinion: the GFX 50s makes more sense than the GFX 100s...
Wow, what a combo!
Can someone explain the reason for having a medium format vs full-frame camera? It seems to me that there's no benifit to the gfx line as their lenses are all darker than what's available for ff, so the equivalent noise and dof would be exactly the same.
Have you ever published a review of GF 32-64? I just haven't found it.
How can you compare the optical performance of GF45/2.8 to this lens?
GFX owner here, did you figure out a way to switch selected faces in focus whilst using the EVF? The manual could have been an extra 300 pages long, it would not have hurt.
Also, have you figured out how to rate images without going deep down in the menus? The button combo stated in the manual does not seem to work with the new firmware. Thank you!
Try dpr forums or fujirumors / fuji x forums.
It is just me, but this video look very good. is it only because medium format?
I dont realy see a clear benefitian except size and weight. I keep with my 34-64 I am curios wich song is thst you use it in this video....?
48 Secs Ago? Right Time to be Here.
Always at 0:00 for Pacific Time (HQ), eh?
Not always, but often :)
@@dpreview Up Real Late, eh? Goodnight.
The 32-64 on paper is a better choice for money, but it is heavy... Not comfortable to walk around with the GFX50R...
Why am I here when I can't afford a medium format system?!
Why are there not any sport/wildlife lenses for Fuji GFX system?
Man I really want to try one of these.
I wanna try too but not buy
Allways primes ! When will a compact Fujifilm GFX 100 R arrive ?
Error in the labelling 1:10 mark...
GFX is the start to bringing medium format to the masses. Well photo enthusiast masses. Yes it's still 10k but not even a decade ago this would cost you a GTR.
I'll buy 32-64 unstead of this lens, and I have 45-100 and 100-200. But I just like zooms more, than primes.
I wish I had my X-T4 for that beautiful golden hour.
nice colors, I prefer my Canon color science, but this looks pretty good as well.
If I ran a photo review company, I would pay anything to have these guys convert to imperial measurements for me.
still waiting for a Shift lens around that focal length ... laowa, fuji ?
I'm from the future and they have one in 2023.
32-64 al lday everyday if i will have GFX one day
and then 100-200 ? or 250 ?
I do NOT like zooms, the one you mention weighs 875 grammes and are 116mm long cost $2300, the 30mm weighs 508 grammes and are 99mm long cost $1700, so the 30mm lens have a superior images quality, handles easier and are cheaper, THAT´s what I like about prime lenses, you do NOT need all that bungee jumping lenses, 2 or 3 prime lenses and you can do nearly all kind of photography !
If only this was a 30mm tilt shift
What kind of bokeh were you expecting for a 30mm f3.5 medium format lens? I doubt that it was high on the engineer's list
That is a bad strategy from Fuji. As you correctly mentioned while Fuji film has 32-64mm F4 while needs 30mm F4?
I hope Fujifilm will wake up and make more bright lenses in that way they can beat FF world ;)
Xt3 open box is $700 bucks on samys camera website for y'all Fuji shooters
1:12 You both shouldn't probably be working in a holiday
This is our lives. Holidays are always work trips. Our wives love it....
Someone sold me his GFX 50R for 2300€ and im happy with the Camera. Its little slow to work with, but the Pictures look nice. I dont understand why fuji isnt bringing faster aperture lenses. at the moment i adopt sigma art lenses and get really nice bokeh. The Pictures of this 30mm 3.5 lens look good, but they dont look like u have taken them with a 10000dollar camera to me...
23mm or 30mm?
guys, I love you, but every video you upload that isn't the R5 review is killing me
You want to see it overheat?
Are you a pyromaniac by any chance? It is going to be very hot...... :)
We've been testing a pre-production unit for a while, and just received our production sample. Stay tuned...
@@thatjordandrake can't wait!
I would absolutely love to have a GFX camera, but where is that eos R5 review lol
We just received our production unit, the review will be out next week!
Can’t wait to watch it, Jordan thanks for the update
Nice
Not very good highlight rendition on these gfx100 cameras.
Fuji GF lenses still don't really convince me all that much when you look at their cost.
1/4 Noct :'D
Good to see a balanced review...the Fuji fanboi's review is insipid...
I want to see a 135mm F1.8 for this camera with the same sharpness as the Sony. It's also worth noting that the Panasonic S1R body is light and compact compared with this one. Cost is the only thing that would deter me from buying a medium format camera.
It's a brand new system, give it a few years or get a GFX 50R and start building your lens system. Pretty sure more affordable bodies are on the way.
@@problemat1que Once the mk ii for the 50r comes out, the price will proly drop to around $2700, on sale it's now $3500, kinda insane for mf.
Looks like bugs would be hanging around with you...
I guess Chris weighs 6 Nocts less than Jordan, I could be wrong tho.
This video gon' git reuploaded
I wate youtube for Nikon Z5.
👍
In full frame terms, 24mm f2.8 but for a whopping $1,700.
This is why medium format makes no sense at the moment.
at the moment? MF gear has ALWAYS demanded a premium because of all the glass having to cover larger sensors, and now at that resolution.
Come to think of it, $1700 is a steal if you make comparisons to other MF... and some FF mirrorless with half the resolution power. It actually makes More sense rather than none.
If you consider that fuji will sell less of them because medium format is expensive, and that it has to cover more then full frame and resolve 100 megapixel, I think you are getting a reasonable deal(Especially because a comparable hasselblad lens costs twice as much, and a schneider phase one four times as much.)
@They Caged Non it is like 23.6mm. But because the aspect ratio is different from full frame, it is slightly taller while being slightly less wide.
@@mythenkanacke2105 it's more like a 4x5 ratio I believe. Great for printing.
$25k worth of camera gear on a family trip?!
Perks of the job :)
Second
With the current lens options, Fuji GFX bodies makes no sense. A typical Sony/Canon Full frame will give better results for literally half the price of the set up. Heck, even Fuji's own XT30 crop sensor will give better results just because the variety of lens you got there.
"Better" how? Better contrast? Better detail? Better chromatic aberrations? Hardly.
@@problemat1que in price to performance ratio. And most of the factors you just mentioned CAN be corrected in post processing. It's totally a preference thing if you wanna go spend double the budget on a marginally "better" camera system. Fujis cant be Hasselblads. Period.
@@sbk_nef People who don't give evidence for their opinions and try to end a conversation with "period" 😂
@@problemat1que people who seek "evidences" in TH-cam comment sections for some opinion which is true but sounds no melodious to their years and think of themselves as pros by grabbing a higher end costly camera to be better at photography, and do not have counter logic to their arguments. 😂😂
You are so right! My iPhone is so much better than my Phase one camera.🤪