It's beyond cringe. Omg. These people don't like guns but watch guns in the movies and play violent games with guns. For once someone set the professor straight. He is spreading stereotypes about the 2A friendly gun owners.
@@rootsevenflat It really would have been good for someone more knowledgeable to explain things to the professor before he holds a class on guns in America. The way he refers to AR-15s indicates he does not understand guns (even thouh he started shooting them at age four). It would have been really good to touch on the Second Amendment as well.
They really needed someone who was more knowledgeable about guns and gun ownership, especially about the historical reasons behind gun ownership. Props to this guy for being brave enough to get up there and try to make a stand. But if you own firearms just because "they're cool and fun" you don't fully understand the responsibilities you have taken on
@TeranRealtor exactly! The core reason for the 2A is to keep a tyrannical government at bay. This isn't discussed enough, it's always about 'self defense' or 'hunting'. The reason why I own and carry is to make 100% sure that the government knows that the People will go only so far before pushing back. And before I get blasted with 'insurrection is illegal', you should remember that this county was founded by insurrection. The right to do this is enshrined in the founding documents.
To be fair, this is a college class so anyone in there is only going to own, or not own, firearms due to their parents. I grew up in a 'no guns' state it wasn't until I was at least 25 that I started understanding how brainwashed and bad it was growing up there and how free and safe the rest of the country could be just by taking responsibility for myself in both safety and other ways.
Which is unconstitutional therefore illegal, background checks are unconstitutional in violation of article 4 section 2 paragraph 1, second amendment,9th amendment,14th amendment section 1.
It’s too easy for mentally ill people to acquire guns in America, the multiple mass shootings every year for 50 years proves that. That’s unacceptable to every modern civilised country in the world except one.
@@dragonf1092, and the 4473 is unconstitutional in that it requires you to waive your 5th amendment rights in order to exercise your 2nd amendment right.
I'm from Texas. Everyone has guns, and it's not a big deal at all. It's a hobby and almost everyone is responsible. If you look at crime stats, it is very rare that gun hobbyists are involved.
Im from northern Wisconsin and this conversation is so bizarre to me. Guns have nothing to do with hurting or killing people. If I purposely shoot someone, that's an issue with my own morality or lack there of.
@@cristophermoen4287 Would you concede that it is possible that someone might attempt to take your life, and that the best response to such a threat is to disable that threat as quickly and reliably as possible, and that the best tool for such a course of action is a firearm?
This alleged educator could have made better use of these students time by running through the thousands of photographs of everyday people kneeling in front of ditches with firearms pointed at the backs of their heads. Our second amendment is what separates us from every place this has ever happened at.
Exactly! communist China and Russia have/had many of the same 'Rights' we have. But the governments there had no problem infringing on those Rights because the people had been disarmed. _"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."_
the second amendment would not work on any other place. Fortunately a rule like that is not in other countries and other countries with gun rights and owners are not concerned with their government infringing on their gun rights. This mindset should never and unlikely cross into other places, better to fester in the states and deal with the repercussions of it
@@tracymartin4517 you left out the part where the store contacts the FBI, verifies the information you provided, & conducts the background check. Until the FBI gives permission to the store, you're not leaving there with a firearm. There is no place in this country where a licensed retailer isn't doing a background check.
@@destroyn8rr342 bro you can print a lower. You can make a functional upper by printing or very rudimentary fabrication. Your point holds no merit these days. Perhaps in the 60s, or 80s... But at this point anyone with a little will and knowhow can just make one. Edit: and in a society where the bad guys have access to guns, I will keep one too.
@@destroyn8rr342 criminals don't gaf about laws. People who plan to die at the end don't care wht your ruleset is. Further, most gun deaths are suicides. Because we don't have assisted suicides and adequate mental health programs here.
This is an interesting session however this would also be a great place to educate people on firearms. The use of semiautomatic was misinterpreted at least 6 times. I think on topics like this it would be better to explain the definition of some of these words so that all the students would have a deeper understanding of the topic. At the very least it would be great to have them all starting off at the same place. But this was a very balanced approach and I hope that it brings more understanding in our already divided world.
The answer to the questions is self-control, respect for human life, morals, and being a reasonable human. It would be as if someone asked how you keep from driving a car over a person crossing against the crosswalk.
Distinctly American/English Culture that goes into real Liberalism, Individualism and the Enlightenment. Which oddly does not include inner cities, although that’s where a majority of Gun Statistics come from.
When factoring guns into how they will be used you must take into account who’s using them & that must include criminals & the mentally ill. You cannot legislate what those people will do , that’s why the USA has mass shootings & will continue to do so & everywhere else doesn’t.
When you have guns you must legislate for them being used by people who don’t have self control, like the mentally challenged or criminals who wish to use them in a malevolent way. It’s pointless catering to the reasoned person, they don’t need to be told not to misuse their gun, car, etc. So the answer isn’t self control, the answer is keeping guns away from dangerous people.
The perception that its a free for all in Texas and other states that dont have very restrictive firearms laws is hilarious. We have to go through background checks just like anywhere else. Pass the background check and you get to purchase the firearm.
In the 90's, when Texas passed their Concealed Carry law, I heard the media screaming about how Texas would become a killing field. The first guy that defended himself was crucified and called a kill, even after the truth came out that he was being beaten by a bigger, stronger, and younger man in a road rage incident. These activists were looking to push a narrative before all the facts came in.
@@jiminauburn5073 That's a good point and a lot of states are like that. I would point out that 99% of legal gun owners are law abiding citizens that would never sell a gun to a known criminal, felon, or sketchy person. In my area, most sales of semi-auto rifles and hand guns are made at a FFL, hunting style rifles like "bolt action" and lever guns, and 50-100 y/o rifles are typically done privately (not at a FFL). Honestly I think burglaries are how criminals get guns and then sell them to other criminals.
7:58 "How do you keep from killing your friends?". I don't know about you guys, but in my country we have knives in the kitchen, and we don't just start throwing them when there is a disagreement.
To be fair to him, as a teenager, he might actually have killed his parents, the night they told him "No, you can't stay out late with your friends just because it's Friday".
Props to the student for not being ashamed of owning guns and giving straight answers. I watched some of the other videos from this professor which I thought were quite good, but this one made me question how genuine professor “dude” is. Says he grew up around guns but clearly doesn’t understand much about them outside of a sociological analysis. Also seems like his questions were loaded (no pun intended). But I’ll give him the benefit of a doubt because I’m not sure what point he was trying to make in his lecture.
Plenty of people grow up around things without ever developing any understanding of them. All the more so sometimes, as they feel like they already have all the understanding they need since they feel familiar with them.
The professor here is trying to get his students to think for themselves. He is kind of behind the 8 ball because most youth today didn't get the self thought process taught to them .
Some folks shoot baskets, some golf, some shoot targets. No one questions a sports-car in the driveway. They aren't dangerous. (is the driver responsible or is it the car ?)
I grew up on Long Island as well. Everyone I knew had firearms in their home. Nobody I knew in my community got shot......... and nobody invaded anyone's home either. Imagine that.
@@JohnGregory-n7o I'll take my nation any day with the freedom that we enjoy here living in a small town where we don't take any crap from anyone because we look after one another just fine.
Americans have this illusion that they are the only people with freedom. Every western country has freedom & actually feel more free & far more chilled than the states.
@@JohnGregory-n7o Well considering that the rate of knife crime he experienced is far *far* lower than what you have to deal with, I'd likely go with his...
The question on... How to you keep from killing your friends with your guns? Should have come back with how do you stop from killing your friends with a knife?
"Do you have a semi-automatic?" Are you joking? Those are the norm. Short of barrel loaders like muskets, and single shot bolt-actions, basically all guns people own are semi-auto I'd assume. Seeing as most full-auto guns are either illegal for private ownership or expensive.
And I decided to actually try to look up the % and according to some sources like say an article from ammunitiondepot, the % of guns in USA that are semi-auto is around 20%. Maybe more, maybe less. So not "basically all", I was wrong about that. Still extremely common though. And in danger of repeating this past mistake, I'm thinking that semi-auto is likely the most common choice for open or conceal carry in day to day life.
This discussion could've really benefitted from someone with knowledge on the matter, preferably from a more free state to give that perspective. The perspective of someone with a CCW would be value add, though obviously hard to find amongst students. The gun owner student gave an interesting perspective for someone from NY though.
Im a Texan. I love more conversations like this. ❤ I love being asked these questions. Few times have i been stumped on firearm questions, but I welcome it.
If you know how many guns you own, it isn't enough. If you can tell people how many guns you own without a lot of caveats, your collection is boring. "Sure, do you want to know how many guns I own or how many firearms I own? I have firearms that aren't guns and guns that aren't firearms. I have functioning (firearm) guns, parts guns, stripped receivers (firearms), antique guns, black powder guns, pellet guns, and even a water gun or two. You tell me what you want to know and I'll check the records book."
In the state of Tennessee you Can open carry be out of the store within 30 minutes of purchasing it with it in your hand. And that's the way it should be
Why should it be like that ? What is wrong with people in Tennessee that everyone has to display a firearm to show they can kill you ! Older countries than yours live gun free & that’s the way it should be imo.
@@JohnGregory-n7o The Constitution protects us from a tyrannical government it happens over and over in history. Everything is not snowflakes and ice cream. And if you had a armed intruder you would think you would need one also
@@JohnGregory-n7o Some people cherish freedom, and some people don't. Just as we will not force you to wear a gun, we will not let you force us to disarm. You think there is something wrong with us exercising our legal rights, but we weep for you and the liberty you lost so long ago it is not even a memory.
@@CJ-ty8sv Ah the old tyrannical government fall back cliche🥴 The myth that citizens owning guns will ever impact a tyrannical American government is a comfortable excuse for not being brave enough to change for the better.
Gun owners need to understand that some people don't know anything about guns and are uncomfortable with the idea. Ignorance equals fear. Just watch the eyes of the girl on his right when he says he owns 15 guns. 😂
here's why you need an AR15: 1. self defense against multiple armed intruders 2. citizens defending themselves against criminal organizations like drug cartels invading towns as they are doing in california 3. defend against a tyrannical government(ie: irish potato famine deaths caused by british, japanese occupation of korea, nazi fascism) 4. defend against violent alien invasion
I hardly think an AR15 or any guns weapons would be effective against an alien invasion. Drug cartels aren't " invading towns" and taking over towns in California like they are in Mexico. It's more like the homeless people taking over California. I live in California. Defending against a tyrannical government nowadays with a gun would be useless as the government can just launch a drone strike. The only real concern is the first reason. But, that's assuming that you can have a loaded weapon ready in a few seconds notice, and if you're carrying it around it becomes kind of a hassle when you're just doing routine things around the house such as eating, using the bathroom, cooking, etc...
@@solar8600 it's a personal decision whether to use arms against tyrannical governments. the point i'm trying to make is that citizens should be allowed to exercise the right to bear arms if they choose to. And not every situation can be handled no matter how well armed you are. The important thing is that government doesn't take away the right of people to defend themselves
@@solar8600 Yes. But they were Japanese culturally, and they simply obeyed. The USG knew this and unfairly applied a tyrannical methodology on them. I like how you thought this was a gotcha question :D
@@dmmchn Ah no need to infer positions onto me that you made up so I fit in your little schema. I just thought it was interesting that the original comment did not even mention the tyrannical methods of the US government when speaking of US problems and instead looked at it from a global scale. As you probably know many Americans do not really think about the extent to which their own country has a history of tyranny (which is natural, every nation's people do this). So you may need a few more years in psychic school before you can read people's minds from behind a screen. A gotcha question would be: Do you really think a semi-auto AR15 would stop the US government? Like what are you gonna do? Shoot government agents? Fight the US military? Become terrorists?
Good morning Prof. Bro. If gun control is such a problem in America, than I'm confused. California has the most restrictive gun ownership laws in the nation...but in LA, San Fran and San Diego, if you commit a crime with a gun that you don't legally own, the "possession/use of an illegal firearm in a crime" charge is typically dismissed by the district attorney's office. How does that work Prof. Bro?
i am from SF. it's dismissed because the D.A. are pro-crime especially the one in LA and Alameda. gascon and pamela price. recalled both of them like you did chesa boudin of SF. my SFPD cop friend say the now D.A. brooks jenkins of SF is 1000 times better than chesa boudin. she has to be, she started the recall for chesa boudin.
As a student, learn the history as to why the founding fathers created the 2nd Amendment (Why was the Bill of Rights created? Answer: It is considered INDIVIDUAL'S RIGHTS!)
Indian student: "You and your friends all have guns. When you get angry at each other, how to you keep from killing each other?" Gun owner: "Do you cook? Do you have knives in all your homes? How do you keep from killing each other?"
@@TryingtoTellYou He quite rightly answered. Sure, if an insane/evil person just decides to murder someone it's a problem, but that doesn't really change anything. Are you worried that your friends are going to stab you or run you over with their car if you argue with them? Or is that simply not a reasonable concern?
"How do you keep from shooting a friend if you get into an argument?" The same way you keep from stabbing your friends when you argue with them and your kitchen drawer is full of knives. Must be difficult...
Exactly. "Hey if you're driving a car with your friend in the passenger seat, how do you not just drive into a building when you get into an argument?"
This entire interaction was just awkward and uncomfortable. Where I come from, having 20+ guns is considered a good start. I have two safes full and need another safe.
I too would have liked to have been there. I didn't consider this conversation a "debate" though. It was more of a Q & A session which I found refreshing. It's all about information and stigmas.
@@TheOnlySgtRock It was refreshing. What we usually see is a heated debate that goes nowhere. The professor made an excellent point that almost everyone, if given the chance, would like to try shooting and would probably like it and think it was cool.
you see how scared anyone was to admit that they owned guns? That say's a lot about the professor's politics. Any conservatives are going to be terrified of being embarrassed by him, not because they can't defend their position, but because they actually respect him...I don't get it.
@@ETS186 Prof didn't know what a .223/5.56 round was, even though he asked the guy if he had an AR15. Every gun owner immediately knew the Prof was ignorant of the subject matter.
if someone uses gun just because they are mad at their friends, it's not the fault of gun ownership. if someone can't handle themselves like that, they don't have to have gun. They will use Knife, Hammer and other weapons anyway to hurt their friends.
In Kentucky it took an 8 hour written exam and shooting a target at seven yards. I received my concealed license in 07. But now we've become a constitutional carry state, now I don't need one.
I have watched several of your videos now. The thing that stands out for me is the kindness and decency which you demonstrate to all students and view points. I teach and I rarely see this kind of respectful approach to conflicting ideas. You give me hope that the university system might not be completely lost.
The second amendment does not grant us the right to own guns. We already have that right. The second amendment prohibits the government from infringing on that right. Read it.
The proper rejoinder to the question, "how do you not just shoot your friends when you get in a fight?" is "how do you not just stab your friends when you get in a fight?" The guns are no different in that scenario than any other deadly object.
So the question was “How as a gun owner do you keep from shooting someone you’re in an argument with?”. Let me throw it back at you. As a person with a vehicle and a drivers license how do you keep from driving drunk or keep from running people over with your vehicle?”. Answer to both questions: Because said actions are federally illegal and all carry harsh punishments/consequences.
This teacher is doing an amazing job of helping each side to understand where the other side is coming from without a lot of bickering and argument and fighting. I love it.
Man, when we were young on the farm, all of our guns were kept in the front clothes closet with the ammo on the top shelf. It was never an issue. Nowadays, people are locking them up more.
I think it more depends on where you live. I would always have at least one gun readily accessible but if I lived in NY I would probably lock the rest up.
"Are you a 'Gun Person'?" I would've had a field day in that assembly/lecture! American Citizen and USMC Veteran, I've been shooting from the age of four. Yes, '4.' ;-)
Do you have large kitchen knives at home? Meat Cleaver? 12" Butcher knife? When you argue with friends do you stab each other? Everyone would say thats a silly question but its the same. Whats the reason most don't pick up large knives sitting on the kitchen counter is the same reason the vast majority of gun owners don't. Its not even a thought or impulse.
An AR-15, is just a modern rifle. A rifle is a rifle....lever action, bolt-action, semi, each with their own advantages and purposes, just like cars. An AR-15 is nothing any more special, other than it is much more modular and customizable to your given purpose. It s just easier to work with in some instances. It isn't any more lethal, dangerous, or problematic than any other rifle.
When I was a kid it was common during hunting seasons to see rifles, shotguns or bows in the back windows of trucks. Also 2-3 kids vehicles in the school parking lot. No one ever shot anyone or stole one….what changed in our DNA that makes people want to do that now?? Guys had a fistfight…done and shook hands…next day probably still didn’t like each other but never wanted to kill each other…??? The parenting has lost touch with the kids maybe…teachers and principals have lost their minds. Our principal knew 75% of the kids first or last names in my school….pretty good for about 800 kids. Engaged with them randomly going down the halls…how many do that now. Guns are not the problem…
There are other guns that shoot the .223, single shots, bolt actions and semi autos. The mini 14 wasn't banned during the clinton weapon ban because it had a wooden stock and looked like a hunting rifle even though it still was a semi auto with a 30 round magazine.
He probably has a mini-14 or something like that because I doubt he’d be afraid of saying he has one if he does. He doesn’t necessarily sound like he has the most knowledge of firearms and he more of just grew up around them and knows some of the basics
All of this gun talk is doing circles around the whole point of the 2nd amendment. 2nd amendment was never intended for hunting or fun, it’s just not in there. It’s intended for self defense, specifically that of the govt should it become tyrannical. So for the love of god can you bring up the pertinent points? Like what happens historically when govts disarm their populations. Or how there are 500k-3m uses of a gun in self defense situations every year vs 42,000 deaths….and that’s ALL deaths, suicides included. Doctors kill more ppl through malpractice every year
For someone to ask the question of, what is stopping you from shooting your friends in an argument, is just insane. What is stopping you from running someone over with your car? What is stopping you from taking the microphone and beating me over the head with it?
I’m glad this student went up there to give some insight but unfortunately he isn’t very knowledgeable. I’m not trying to get down on him but his state is pretty restrictive and in turn keeps him from having more experiences.
@@KJ-ho6sb exactly. He was terrified of offending someone and even resorted to referring to AR's as "the scary rifle" I give him credit for trying and going forward but he did not represent gun owners very well and even actively tried to distance himself at times. This has been my least favorite video on this channel so far just because the 'other side' wasn't represented very well
Shooting since 4? Come on bro. Uses that as an argument from authority but doesnt know what a .223 is? Doubt. I feel bad for these kids that this professor can just run over these students because they also are largely ignorant about firearms.
I was in the military and am a gun owner from Texas but grew up where guns weren't allowed. I'd love to give better perspective on guns in America if I got invited to guest speaker.
As a Veteran I'd Have Been a great person for choice to talk on this topic in your class,,,,,,so if you're ever having this topic again you can always reach out to me,,,,,thanks for the video on this topic
I think most of us would love to be in this room and have an honest conversation without being screamed at by anti-2A lunatics. That's something the country is severely lacking. People are having conversations over the Internet rather than in person.
After seeing some of the bro prof's videos (and liking them), I was surprised how fast he can fall into stupid. Crazy amount of guns? How do you keep from shooting people? All emotion, no stats. Hopefully, this was not on the test.
It is very obvious to me none of these people have bought a firearm. You do not walk in show a license and walk out immediately with a weapon. Anyone that says that is completely ignorant and blowing smoke up your butt.
I enjoy this professor. I've watched a lot of his videos. In 99% of cases, he has researched his topic so that the presentation can be given/presented objectively. However, to blatantly say "I shot guns as young as 4-5, ".. .then later say "I don't know what I am talking about"... and referring to them as "semi-automatic"....which describes nearly all gun styles and the majority of guns out there being used and sold today (bolt action single fire guns would be in the minority) is a bit frustrating to me.
What keeps us from shooting our friends when we are angry? The same thing that keeps us from knifing them, or driving over them, or clubbing them with a baseball bat, or just choking them out.
Imagine that you can get a concealed if you are regularly carrying over 10k cash as part of business but not to defend yourself....shows what the government finds more valuable.
I wouldn't call myself a gun enthusiast as far as owning a multitude of guns . I'm not even a hunter not saying I wouldn't go hunting. the ideal of not having a right to a gun would make me feel like a lower-tier life-form. A gun in my opinion is the great equalizer in a world full of predators and chaos. With a gun I feel like I have a chance to exist.
Good exchange. Here is a suggestion for an improvement. Get an American gun owner up there. And bring up a Chinese, Russian and German student. Ask them how many governments their home country had in the last 245 years. China will say 4. Germany will say 4. Russia will say 3. Then ask how many of THEIR people did their governments kill in that time. China will say 45,000,000. Germany will say 10,000,000. Russia will say 20,000,000. Then ask the American how many governments the USA has had in that time. Answer: 1. How many Americans did the government kill: counting the so-called "Indian wars," answer: 50,000. And the reason is the 2nd Amendment. Communists stole China and Germany because their people didn't have personal firearms to stop them. Germany: fascists. Sir: let the facts speak for themselves.
I just discovered this series and love it! Huge shout out to the students and faculty that put these together. I have a degree in social sciences and currently work in healthcare. I was raised without firearms or knowledge of such in a mostly liberal household. I got my first firearm, a semi auto pistol, a few years ago and immediately fell in love with shooting. I can’t tell you enough how important discussions like these are to me, personally. Gun culture is so much more dynamic and nuanced than the media portrays. Yes, we have issues in this country with violence in general, but the inaminate objects are only a small part of the issue. Human behavior will always be a complicated topic. There are great books/studies by Jennifer Carlson, David Yamane to name couple that don’t just jump on the bandwagon wagon of denouncing gun culture, but rather look into it through participant observation and find all sorts of complexities. I recommend looking into the Liberal Gun Club and their root cause mitigation policies as well. Regardless, thank you. It’s nice to see academia exploring the whole rather than the ignorant narrow that many critics attribute to education. Keep it up!
No state shall convert a liberty into a license, and charge a fee therefore. Murdock V. Pennsylvania,319 US 105. If the state converts a right (liberty) into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right (liberty) with impunity. Shuttles worth V. City of Birmingham,Alabama,373 US 262.
It always seems like these sorts of debates pick the worst representatives of gun owners. While it's got to be tough to defend a position in front of a bunch of people like this, surely you could find someone that at least owns and controls his own firearms rather than stuff his dad has bought for him.
Love that the student hopped up to talk about casual firearm ownership, but like a lot of folks are mentioning in the comments... its kinda a strawman discussion. I'd prefer a better champion. But this probably does represent most pro 2A kids in collage, your beliefs havent been fully formed yet.
I live in Georgia, and I didnt have to get training or anything to get my carry license. There was a background check. I paid the fee. I got my license in 2 weeks.
Im from Arkansas and im amazed at how little knowledge these ppl have about guns!! 💩 The government won't have to take back our guns if ppl don't know or care anything about it! But trust me in the south we take it seriously and I don't hunt because I personally don't like killing anything...i realize its kinda hypocritical but I don't enjoy that part! However gun safety, the gun range, knowledge of your gun, practice with your guns are important! Also storage is very important and everyone I know puts them in a strong/huge gun safe! I mean mine weighs 800 lbs! So nobody that shouldn't have access to guns will not be getting mine!
Week of September 5th 2023. This is significant because this is the week that all new Mexican voters should decide to vote out the governor of New Mexico for banning the concealed and open carry of firearms in the Albuquerque area for 30 days.
I imagine it is hard when you are young and in the spotlight to articulate your position and overall, I think Robert, our gun owner did a good job. I do appreciate the discussion because it actually was a "normal" discussion of the subject of firearm ownership. That said, in response to the question about what's with all the guns, self-defense, recreation, and hunting. It is important to understand the historical context though. The 2nd Amendment is about giving the people arms for self-defense from either a criminal or particularly a tyrannical government. Beyond that, it's fun, like the one young lady on (stage) right said. In response to Parth's question - and keep in mind, I'm 51 and have owned guns since I was 18 - it's easy not to shoot my friends over a disagreement because I'm not a murderer. Guns don't make a person kill. A killer might use a gun, but the motive doesn't come from the firearm . All things said though, I appreciated the conversation and give credit to the professor.
That professor is annoying . And was bashing the guy but then said " I got you beat , I started at 4 ! Proud professor . But if you are a criminal none of these rules apply .
Guy 1:"how do you keep yourself from shooting your friend in an argument?" Guy 2: "do you have a knife at home?" Guy 1: "yes..." Guy 2: "how do you keep yourself from stabbing your friend in an argument?"
When someone asks what a .223 is, don't say, "It's a military round". Try, "A .22 is about the smallest diameter bullet commonly found. A .223 is .003 inches bigger in diameter."
I love the concept of an open discussion in the classroom. Let the students discuss their hobbies openly. But it's not really fair to anyone in the room to have him answering technical or legal questions about acquiring/storing/carrying firearms. It would be really helpful to have this exact same discussion, but with an expert in the room to whom the student could defer.
It's hard for a gun person to watch this. The ignorance (though no fault of their own) is astounding.
It's beyond cringe. Omg. These people don't like guns but watch guns in the movies and play violent games with guns. For once someone set the professor straight. He is spreading stereotypes about the 2A friendly gun owners.
@@houseofhas9355Give an example.
@@rootsevenflat"I'm not as crazy as you"
@@rootsevenflat It really would have been good for someone more knowledgeable to explain things to the professor before he holds a class on guns in America. The way he refers to AR-15s indicates he does not understand guns (even thouh he started shooting them at age four).
It would have been really good to touch on the Second Amendment as well.
@@TeranRealtor What was wrong with how he referred to AR-15s?
They really needed someone who was more knowledgeable about guns and gun ownership, especially about the historical reasons behind gun ownership.
Props to this guy for being brave enough to get up there and try to make a stand. But if you own firearms just because "they're cool and fun" you don't fully understand the responsibilities you have taken on
He always asks for the gun guy but he always gets the guy related to the gun guy
He needs to stop asking for a "gun guy" and ask for a "2A guy".
@TeranRealtor exactly! The core reason for the 2A is to keep a tyrannical government at bay. This isn't discussed enough, it's always about 'self defense' or 'hunting'. The reason why I own and carry is to make 100% sure that the government knows that the People will go only so far before pushing back. And before I get blasted with 'insurrection is illegal', you should remember that this county was founded by insurrection. The right to do this is enshrined in the founding documents.
Absolutely 💯% Soon On!!!
To be fair, this is a college class so anyone in there is only going to own, or not own, firearms due to their parents. I grew up in a 'no guns' state it wasn't until I was at least 25 that I started understanding how brainwashed and bad it was growing up there and how free and safe the rest of the country could be just by taking responsibility for myself in both safety and other ways.
You can't just walk in to a gun store, show your license and walk out with a gun. You have to fill out a Form 4473 and have a background check run.
Which is unconstitutional therefore illegal, background checks are unconstitutional in violation of article 4 section 2 paragraph 1, second amendment,9th amendment,14th amendment section 1.
It’s too easy for mentally ill people to acquire guns in America, the multiple mass shootings every year for 50 years proves that.
That’s unacceptable to every modern civilised country in the world except one.
@@dragonf1092, and the 4473 is unconstitutional in that it requires you to waive your 5th amendment rights in order to exercise your 2nd amendment right.
I'm from Texas. Everyone has guns, and it's not a big deal at all. It's a hobby and almost everyone is responsible. If you look at crime stats, it is very rare that gun hobbyists are involved.
Im from northern Wisconsin and this conversation is so bizarre to me. Guns have nothing to do with hurting or killing people. If I purposely shoot someone, that's an issue with my own morality or lack there of.
Self defense?
@@DaveTex2375 self defense what?
@@cristophermoen4287 Would you concede that it is possible that someone might attempt to take your life, and that the best response to such a threat is to disable that threat as quickly and reliably as possible, and that the best tool for such a course of action is a firearm?
@@StupidAnon-gn8ih yes, definitely! I was only referring to murder, not self defense.
@@cristophermoen4287 Understood. Carry on.
This alleged educator could have made better use of these students time by running through the thousands of photographs of everyday people kneeling in front of ditches with firearms pointed at the backs of their heads. Our second amendment is what separates us from every place this has ever happened at.
Exactly! communist China and Russia have/had many of the same 'Rights' we have. But the governments there had no problem infringing on those Rights because the people had been disarmed.
_"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."_
@@gusmc2220 I've been saying for years that a lynch mob is a democracy, usually followed up with "I'm sorry son, but you lost fair and square."
Alleged educator is a stretch, needs to go talk to gun salesman before doing another BS class
the second amendment would not work on any other place. Fortunately a rule like that is not in other countries and other countries with gun rights and owners are not concerned with their government infringing on their gun rights. This mindset should never and unlikely cross into other places, better to fester in the states and deal with the repercussions of it
@@VerryJerry90 spoken like a true subject. you enjoy those boots now ya hear!
To the Indian guy, how do you NOT stab your friends to death after an argument?
When today or back before colonisation came to town lol
There is no way in hell I'm telling an auditorium full of college students how many weapons I have in my house.
The correct answer is "I'd have to check with my log book. I don't have that information with me."
"How many guns do I own?" None. I lost them in a boating accident somewhere off the Atlantic.
"Is anyone a gun owner"
(30yr old veteran on a GI bill stands up)
I am
@@robertgreenberg906 Hell ya bro 😎
Drunk
“I’m a fly, I’m a pilot”
😂😂
“You can just walk in and show your license and walk out with it”. Correct, as long as you pass the background check
And fill out the forms correctly, upon which making a mistake or lying is a felony.
In Texas if you have a License To Carry, you walk in, fill out the federal form 4473, pay for the gun and walk out with it.
@@tracymartin4517 you left out the part where the store contacts the FBI, verifies the information you provided, & conducts the background check. Until the FBI gives permission to the store, you're not leaving there with a firearm. There is no place in this country where a licensed retailer isn't doing a background check.
Having all of your guns in a safe isn't going to help you during a home invasion.
With effective gun control the person invading your house doesn't have a gun either. You just need a bigger bar than him/her.
@@destroyn8rr342 Name one law that has never been broken. You can't so there us no such thing as effective gun control.
@@destroyn8rr342 bro you can print a lower. You can make a functional upper by printing or very rudimentary fabrication.
Your point holds no merit these days. Perhaps in the 60s, or 80s...
But at this point anyone with a little will and knowhow can just make one.
Edit: and in a society where the bad guys have access to guns, I will keep one too.
@@destroyn8rr342 criminals don't gaf about laws. People who plan to die at the end don't care wht your ruleset is.
Further, most gun deaths are suicides. Because we don't have assisted suicides and adequate mental health programs here.
This is an interesting session however this would also be a great place to educate people on firearms. The use of semiautomatic was misinterpreted at least 6 times. I think on topics like this it would be better to explain the definition of some of these words so that all the students would have a deeper understanding of the topic. At the very least it would be great to have them all starting off at the same place. But this was a very balanced approach and I hope that it brings more understanding in our already divided world.
The answer to the questions is self-control, respect for human life, morals, and being a reasonable human. It would be as if someone asked how you keep from driving a car over a person crossing against the crosswalk.
Or how do you keep a car within the speed limits?
Distinctly American/English Culture that goes into real Liberalism, Individualism and the Enlightenment. Which oddly does not include inner cities, although that’s where a majority of Gun Statistics come from.
When factoring guns into how they will be used you must take into account who’s using them & that must include criminals & the mentally ill.
You cannot legislate what those people will do , that’s why the USA has mass shootings & will continue to do so & everywhere else doesn’t.
When you have guns you must legislate for them being used by people who don’t have self control, like the mentally challenged or criminals who wish to use them in a malevolent way.
It’s pointless catering to the reasoned person, they don’t need to be told not to misuse their gun, car, etc.
So the answer isn’t self control, the answer is keeping guns away from dangerous people.
Dude, I was thinking the exact same thing - its amazing so many people do not realize this
The perception that its a free for all in Texas and other states that dont have very restrictive firearms laws is hilarious. We have to go through background checks just like anywhere else. Pass the background check and you get to purchase the firearm.
I was gonna say the same thing...
In the 90's, when Texas passed their Concealed Carry law, I heard the media screaming about how Texas would become a killing field. The first guy that defended himself was crucified and called a kill, even after the truth came out that he was being beaten by a bigger, stronger, and younger man in a road rage incident. These activists were looking to push a narrative before all the facts came in.
Pretty sure private sales do not need a background check in Texas, correct me if I am wrong.
@@jiminauburn5073 You are correct, private sales do not require a background check. Only if you are buying from a licensed FFL dealer.
@@jiminauburn5073 That's a good point and a lot of states are like that. I would point out that 99% of legal gun owners are law abiding citizens that would never sell a gun to a known criminal, felon, or sketchy person. In my area, most sales of semi-auto rifles and hand guns are made at a FFL, hunting style rifles like "bolt action" and lever guns, and 50-100 y/o rifles are typically done privately (not at a FFL).
Honestly I think burglaries are how criminals get guns and then sell them to other criminals.
7:58 "How do you keep from killing your friends?". I don't know about you guys, but in my country we have knives in the kitchen, and we don't just start throwing them when there is a disagreement.
To be fair to him, as a teenager, he might actually have killed his parents, the night they told him "No, you can't stay out late with your friends just because it's Friday".
The professor asks "do you own a semi-automatic?" as if those are the scariest ones lol.
I have 23 muzzleloaders
Props to the student for not being ashamed of owning guns and giving straight answers. I watched some of the other videos from this professor which I thought were quite good, but this one made me question how genuine professor “dude” is. Says he grew up around guns but clearly doesn’t understand much about them outside of a sociological analysis. Also seems like his questions were loaded (no pun intended). But I’ll give him the benefit of a doubt because I’m not sure what point he was trying to make in his lecture.
He wasn’t trying to make any point , he was trying to open a conversation with his students.
Plenty of people grow up around things without ever developing any understanding of them. All the more so sometimes, as they feel like they already have all the understanding they need since they feel familiar with them.
HOw genuine he is? What does that even mean?
He was driving me nuts,trying to shame a guy for exercising a constitutional right
The professor here is trying to get his students to think for themselves. He is kind of behind the 8 ball because most youth today didn't get the self thought process taught to them .
Some folks shoot baskets, some golf, some shoot targets. No one questions a sports-car in the driveway. They aren't dangerous. (is the driver responsible or is it the car ?)
I grew up on Long Island as well. Everyone I knew had firearms in their home. Nobody I knew in my community got shot......... and nobody invaded anyone's home either. Imagine that.
I lived in London England for 30 years, no guns & no home invasions either, which is preferable your experience or mine ?
@@JohnGregory-n7o I'll take my nation any day with the freedom that we enjoy here living in a small town where we don't take any crap from anyone because we look after one another just fine.
Americans have this illusion that they are the only people with freedom.
Every western country has freedom & actually feel more free & far more chilled than the states.
@@JohnGregory-n7o Well considering that the rate of knife crime he experienced is far *far* lower than what you have to deal with, I'd likely go with his...
@@mylesleggette7520 I’ve never experienced one single incident of knife crime.
The question on... How to you keep from killing your friends with your guns? Should have come back with how do you stop from killing your friends with a knife?
I would have said, "Murder is illegal."
I thought the exact same thing. It was a stupid question.
Or braining his friends with his 🔨😂🤣😂🤣😂 the idiocy of these people.
"Do you have a semi-automatic?" Are you joking? Those are the norm. Short of barrel loaders like muskets, and single shot bolt-actions, basically all guns people own are semi-auto I'd assume. Seeing as most full-auto guns are either illegal for private ownership or expensive.
Pump-actions
I have a lot of guns. Most of them are not semi-automatic.
@@---cr8nw So what, mostly pump action, lever action, etc?
@@alastermyst, lots of bolt actions and single action revolvers. I love me some old bolt action shotguns.
And I decided to actually try to look up the % and according to some sources like say an article from ammunitiondepot, the % of guns in USA that are semi-auto is around 20%. Maybe more, maybe less.
So not "basically all", I was wrong about that.
Still extremely common though.
And in danger of repeating this past mistake, I'm thinking that semi-auto is likely the most common choice for open or conceal carry in day to day life.
This discussion could've really benefitted from someone with knowledge on the matter, preferably from a more free state to give that perspective. The perspective of someone with a CCW would be value add, though obviously hard to find amongst students. The gun owner student gave an interesting perspective for someone from NY though.
I really like these videos! I love guns. But this was not a good discussion on guns.
Well said sir it would of bren good for an open class debate..
Im a Texan. I love more conversations like this. ❤ I love being asked these questions. Few times have i been stumped on firearm questions, but I welcome it.
15 guns isn’t a lot 🤣 most gun people I know own 30
If you know how many guns you own, it isn't enough. If you can tell people how many guns you own without a lot of caveats, your collection is boring.
"Sure, do you want to know how many guns I own or how many firearms I own? I have firearms that aren't guns and guns that aren't firearms. I have functioning (firearm) guns, parts guns, stripped receivers (firearms), antique guns, black powder guns, pellet guns, and even a water gun or two. You tell me what you want to know and I'll check the records book."
In the state of Tennessee you Can open carry be out of the store within 30 minutes of purchasing it with it in your hand. And that's the way it should be
Why should it be like that ?
What is wrong with people in Tennessee that everyone has to display a firearm to show they can kill you !
Older countries than yours live gun free & that’s the way it should be imo.
@@JohnGregory-n7o The Constitution protects us from a tyrannical government it happens over and over in history. Everything is not snowflakes and ice cream. And if you had a armed intruder you would think you would need one also
@@JohnGregory-n7o Some people cherish freedom, and some people don't. Just as we will not force you to wear a gun, we will not let you force us to disarm. You think there is something wrong with us exercising our legal rights, but we weep for you and the liberty you lost so long ago it is not even a memory.
@@JohnGregory-n7o Can you name an older gun-free country that never experienced a tyrannical Government at some point in its history?
@@CJ-ty8sv Ah the old tyrannical government fall back cliche🥴
The myth that citizens owning guns will ever impact a tyrannical American government is a comfortable excuse for not being brave enough to change for the better.
Gun owners need to understand that some people don't know anything about guns and are uncomfortable with the idea. Ignorance equals fear.
Just watch the eyes of the girl on his right when he says he owns 15 guns. 😂
Like Native indigenous peoples before COLONISATION 😂😂😂
@@turangatohiariki3042 Interesting leap of logic there. 🤔
@@Mike_Daddy leap or your ignorance to owning whitd american history all us Native's had before colonisation was stick's
Don’t tell anyone how many guns you have
I lost all mine tragically in a boating accident. 😭...😅..😉
here's why you need an AR15:
1. self defense against multiple armed intruders
2. citizens defending themselves against criminal organizations like drug cartels invading towns as they are doing in california
3. defend against a tyrannical government(ie: irish potato famine deaths caused by british, japanese occupation of korea, nazi fascism)
4. defend against violent alien invasion
I hardly think an AR15 or any guns weapons would be effective against an alien invasion. Drug cartels aren't " invading towns" and taking over towns in California like they are in Mexico. It's more like the homeless people taking over California. I live in California. Defending against a tyrannical government nowadays with a gun would be useless as the government can just launch a drone strike. The only real concern is the first reason. But, that's assuming that you can have a loaded weapon ready in a few seconds notice, and if you're carrying it around it becomes kind of a hassle when you're just doing routine things around the house such as eating, using the bathroom, cooking, etc...
Should the Japanese Americans of used guns against the US when they were tyrannically interned?
@@solar8600 it's a personal decision whether to use arms against tyrannical governments. the point i'm trying to make is that citizens should be allowed to exercise the right to bear arms if they choose to. And not every situation can be handled no matter how well armed you are. The important thing is that government doesn't take away the right of people to defend themselves
@@solar8600 Yes.
But they were Japanese culturally, and they simply obeyed.
The USG knew this and unfairly applied a tyrannical methodology on them.
I like how you thought this was a gotcha question :D
@@dmmchn Ah no need to infer positions onto me that you made up so I fit in your little schema. I just thought it was interesting that the original comment did not even mention the tyrannical methods of the US government when speaking of US problems and instead looked at it from a global scale. As you probably know many Americans do not really think about the extent to which their own country has a history of tyranny (which is natural, every nation's people do this). So you may need a few more years in psychic school before you can read people's minds from behind a screen. A gotcha question would be: Do you really think a semi-auto AR15 would stop the US government? Like what are you gonna do? Shoot government agents? Fight the US military? Become terrorists?
Talkkng to a hunter is vastly differnt then talking to a pro2a person. Hunters are generally 100% ok with subverting the 2a
The answer to “why” is the Constitution of the USA. It is the ultimate defense to tyranny. Period, end of answer.
Good morning Prof. Bro.
If gun control is such a problem in America, than I'm confused.
California has the most restrictive gun ownership laws in the nation...but in LA, San Fran and San Diego, if you commit a crime with a gun that you don't legally own, the "possession/use of an illegal firearm in a crime" charge is typically dismissed by the district attorney's office.
How does that work Prof. Bro?
Yes and any law abiding citizen that accidentally breaks the law will be charged, found guilty, fined and serve time.
i am from SF. it's dismissed because the D.A. are pro-crime especially the one in LA and Alameda. gascon and pamela price. recalled both of them like you did chesa boudin of SF. my SFPD cop friend say the now D.A. brooks jenkins of SF is 1000 times better than chesa boudin. she has to be, she started the recall for chesa boudin.
@@brisbanekilarny6212😂😂😂
Democratic policy is the problem. Not law abiding citizens breaking laws which would Acount for .0003 percent of guns
That's a Democrat policy problem, not a Gun Control problem Lol. Anyone who lives in a Democrat state knows that
As a student, learn the history as to why the founding fathers created the 2nd Amendment (Why was the Bill of Rights created? Answer: It is considered INDIVIDUAL'S RIGHTS!)
Or even better why did coloniser's land on Native indigenous peoples land's when we only had stick's lol
@@turangatohiariki3042 again, go back to school and learn the history
Indian student: "You and your friends all have guns. When you get angry at each other, how to you keep from killing each other?"
Gun owner: "Do you cook? Do you have knives in all your homes? How do you keep from killing each other?"
He quite rightly asked what happens when tensions boil and there is no self control. The response he got was "that doesn't happen."
The real problem isn't the gun. It's the person.
Where is the blame to the pharmaceutical companies.
@@TheAncientOnes-wp4hy Some parts of India, but not all of India.
@@TryingtoTellYou He quite rightly answered. Sure, if an insane/evil person just decides to murder someone it's a problem, but that doesn't really change anything. Are you worried that your friends are going to stab you or run you over with their car if you argue with them? Or is that simply not a reasonable concern?
"How do you keep from shooting a friend if you get into an argument?" The same way you keep from stabbing your friends when you argue with them and your kitchen drawer is full of knives. Must be difficult...
Exactly. "Hey if you're driving a car with your friend in the passenger seat, how do you not just drive into a building when you get into an argument?"
This entire interaction was just awkward and uncomfortable. Where I come from, having 20+ guns is considered a good start. I have two safes full and need another safe.
The equivalent question of ridiculousness: Jay Leno owns 185 cars and 160 motorcycles. So how does he keep from running people over?
I want to take this class just so I can debate this topic.
I too would have liked to have been there. I didn't consider this conversation a "debate" though. It was more of a Q & A session which I found refreshing. It's all about information and stigmas.
@@TheOnlySgtRock It was refreshing. What we usually see is a heated debate that goes nowhere. The professor made an excellent point that almost everyone, if given the chance, would like to try shooting and would probably like it and think it was cool.
This Prof is one of the best I've seen and better than most I experienced when I was a college student.
He also had guns when he was 5, but can't tell you what the difference is between a .223 and 5.56
If you think he's a great professor you haven't had many good professors
@@Chaos8282he clearly doesn't understand what Semi-Automatic means either
Not to pick on the prof but he should have known that background checks state you have to be a US citizen and not a foreign national to buy a gun.
Why because he deflect's from white american history & look's outside culture's of thd USA & the critic the diffrence's with people 😂😂😂
you see how scared anyone was to admit that they owned guns? That say's a lot about the professor's politics. Any conservatives are going to be terrified of being embarrassed by him, not because they can't defend their position, but because they actually respect him...I don't get it.
He said he grew up with guns, started shooting at 4 yo, later in the video..
@@ETS186 Yet he doesn't know that semi-automatics (like Glock or the Ruger 10/22) are some of the most popular firearms?
@@ETS186 Prof didn't know what a .223/5.56 round was, even though he asked the guy if he had an AR15. Every gun owner immediately knew the Prof was ignorant of the subject matter.
if someone uses gun just because they are mad at their friends, it's not the fault of gun ownership.
if someone can't handle themselves like that, they don't have to have gun.
They will use Knife, Hammer and other weapons anyway to hurt their friends.
In Kentucky it took an 8 hour written exam and shooting a target at seven yards. I received my concealed license in 07. But now we've become a constitutional carry state, now I don't need one.
Same in Ohio and that's the way it should be. We don't have to get a license to practice free speech in public.
I have watched several of your videos now. The thing that stands out for me is the kindness and decency which you demonstrate to all students and view points. I teach and I rarely see this kind of respectful approach to conflicting ideas. You give me hope that the university system might not be completely lost.
Prof "I started shooting when I was 4" "I am a gun guy" Also prof regarding .223 5.56 "I don't know what you are talking about."
In other words, "I haven't touched a gun since I was 4".
I think he was just playing ignorant to bring the answers out of LI kid.
The second amendment does not grant us the right to own guns. We already have that right. The second amendment prohibits the government from infringing on that right. Read it.
The proper rejoinder to the question, "how do you not just shoot your friends when you get in a fight?" is "how do you not just stab your friends when you get in a fight?" The guns are no different in that scenario than any other deadly object.
So the question was “How as a gun owner do you keep from shooting someone you’re in an argument with?”. Let me throw it back at you. As a person with a vehicle and a drivers license how do you keep from driving drunk or keep from running people over with your vehicle?”. Answer to both questions: Because said actions are federally illegal and all carry harsh punishments/consequences.
This teacher is doing an amazing job of helping each side to understand where the other side is coming from without a lot of bickering and argument and fighting. I love it.
“Do you have a semi automatic?” then he says he grew up with guns. LoL
"I grew up with guns" can mean "Dad had a shotgun in the house." It doesn't mean that Dad had an armory.
"No, all my guns are muskets." LOL.
I'd love to go there and talk to these folks. I left PA because of how it's going, but I'll come back for a chat.
How do you keep from shooting someone,
same way you never stabbed anyone in your kitchen.
Man, when we were young on the farm, all of our guns were kept in the front clothes closet with the ammo on the top shelf. It was never an issue. Nowadays, people are locking them up more.
I think it more depends on where you live. I would always have at least one gun readily accessible but if I lived in NY I would probably lock the rest up.
How do you not shoot your friends when you get angry... Same way I don't hit people with my car...
"Are you a 'Gun Person'?"
I would've had a field day in that assembly/lecture!
American Citizen and USMC Veteran, I've been shooting from the age of four. Yes, '4.'
;-)
Do you have large kitchen knives at home? Meat Cleaver? 12" Butcher knife? When you argue with friends do you stab each other? Everyone would say thats a silly question but its the same. Whats the reason most don't pick up large knives sitting on the kitchen counter is the same reason the vast majority of gun owners don't. Its not even a thought or impulse.
180 semester hours of higher education, and I've never had a teacher that put this much effort into making class interesting. Great job professor.
An AR-15, is just a modern rifle. A rifle is a rifle....lever action, bolt-action, semi, each with their own advantages and purposes, just like cars. An AR-15 is nothing any more special, other than it is much more modular and customizable to your given purpose. It s just easier to work with in some instances. It isn't any more lethal, dangerous, or problematic than any other rifle.
When I was a kid it was common during hunting seasons to see rifles, shotguns or bows in the back windows of trucks. Also 2-3 kids vehicles in the school parking lot. No one ever shot anyone or stole one….what changed in our DNA that makes people want to do that now?? Guys had a fistfight…done and shook hands…next day probably still didn’t like each other but never wanted to kill each other…??? The parenting has lost touch with the kids maybe…teachers and principals have lost their minds. Our principal knew 75% of the kids first or last names in my school….pretty good for about 800 kids. Engaged with them randomly going down the halls…how many do that now. Guns are not the problem…
Lack of morals being taught by parents and schools anymore.
Here in Tennessee almost every man would raise their hand! And half of the women! Thank God
I doubt whether prof really grew up around guns.
Also, .223/5.56NATO is used in AR15. Home boi is trying hard to avoid saying AR15 🤣
There are other guns that shoot the .223, single shots, bolt actions and semi autos. The mini 14 wasn't banned during the clinton weapon ban because it had a wooden stock and looked like a hunting rifle even though it still was a semi auto with a 30 round magazine.
He probably has a mini-14 or something like that because I doubt he’d be afraid of saying he has one if he does. He doesn’t necessarily sound like he has the most knowledge of firearms and he more of just grew up around them and knows some of the basics
All of this gun talk is doing circles around the whole point of the 2nd amendment. 2nd amendment was never intended for hunting or fun, it’s just not in there. It’s intended for self defense, specifically that of the govt should it become tyrannical. So for the love of god can you bring up the pertinent points? Like what happens historically when govts disarm their populations. Or how there are 500k-3m uses of a gun in self defense situations every year vs 42,000 deaths….and that’s ALL deaths, suicides included. Doctors kill more ppl through malpractice every year
Nobody red that amendment. It’s not about having guns.
Your data is beating a false drum. It’s appels and peers comparison.
For someone to ask the question of, what is stopping you from shooting your friends in an argument, is just insane. What is stopping you from running someone over with your car? What is stopping you from taking the microphone and beating me over the head with it?
At one time I had over 100 firearms pistols & rifles and was a gunsmith and a gun dealer! I think I would like your class!
I stopped watching as soon as I heard, "Do you have a semi-automatic?" At that point I just thought, "Yeah, I know where this is going."
I’m glad this student went up there to give some insight but unfortunately he isn’t very knowledgeable. I’m not trying to get down on him but his state is pretty restrictive and in turn keeps him from having more experiences.
not only that but he looks scared af
@@KJ-ho6sb exactly. He was terrified of offending someone and even resorted to referring to AR's as "the scary rifle"
I give him credit for trying and going forward but he did not represent gun owners very well and even actively tried to distance himself at times.
This has been my least favorite video on this channel so far just because the 'other side' wasn't represented very well
@@gusmc2220 prof was also clueless to what was happening… it’s all a little sad
Shooting since 4? Come on bro. Uses that as an argument from authority but doesnt know what a .223 is? Doubt.
I feel bad for these kids that this professor can just run over these students because they also are largely ignorant about firearms.
This is ridiculous that a room, this full of people, only has one gun owner and he’s afraid and has no knowledge of guns.
I was in the military and am a gun owner from Texas but grew up where guns weren't allowed. I'd love to give better perspective on guns in America if I got invited to guest speaker.
As a Veteran I'd Have Been a great person for choice to talk on this topic in your class,,,,,,so if you're ever having this topic again you can always reach out to me,,,,,thanks for the video on this topic
I think most of us would love to be in this room and have an honest conversation without being screamed at by anti-2A lunatics. That's something the country is severely lacking. People are having conversations over the Internet rather than in person.
The professor is spreading sterotypes about 2A friendly gun owners. He needs stop acting that way.
After seeing some of the bro prof's videos (and liking them), I was surprised how fast he can fall into stupid.
Crazy amount of guns? How do you keep from shooting people?
All emotion, no stats. Hopefully, this was not on the test.
It is very obvious to me none of these people have bought a firearm.
You do not walk in show a license and walk out immediately with a weapon. Anyone that says that is completely ignorant and blowing smoke up your butt.
This kid is not a real gun enthusiast. Doesn’t even know the combo to the gun safe.
I enjoy this professor. I've watched a lot of his videos. In 99% of cases, he has researched his topic so that the presentation can be given/presented objectively. However, to blatantly say "I shot guns as young as 4-5, ".. .then later say "I don't know what I am talking about"... and referring to them as "semi-automatic"....which describes nearly all gun styles and the majority of guns out there being used and sold today (bolt action single fire guns would be in the minority) is a bit frustrating to me.
What keeps us from shooting our friends when we are angry? The same thing that keeps us from knifing them, or driving over them, or clubbing them with a baseball bat, or just choking them out.
Imagine that you can get a concealed if you are regularly carrying over 10k cash as part of business but not to defend yourself....shows what the government finds more valuable.
That is no longer the law in NY.
I wouldn't call myself a gun enthusiast as far as owning a multitude of guns . I'm not even a hunter not saying I wouldn't go hunting. the ideal of not having a right to a gun would make me feel like a lower-tier life-form. A gun in my opinion is the great equalizer in a world full of predators and chaos. With a gun I feel like I have a chance to exist.
You said it. "The great equalizer". No longer am I subject to your brawn, youth, size or numbers.
Good exchange. Here is a suggestion for an improvement. Get an American gun owner up there. And bring up a Chinese, Russian and German student. Ask them how many governments their home country had in the last 245 years. China will say 4. Germany will say 4. Russia will say 3. Then ask how many of THEIR people did their governments kill in that time. China will say 45,000,000. Germany will say 10,000,000. Russia will say 20,000,000. Then ask the American how many governments the USA has had in that time. Answer: 1. How many Americans did the government kill: counting the so-called "Indian wars," answer: 50,000. And the reason is the 2nd Amendment. Communists stole China and Germany because their people didn't have personal firearms to stop them. Germany: fascists. Sir: let the facts speak for themselves.
Looking at a classroom of college kids today, looks like a highschool class 20 years ago. This is getting bad
I just discovered this series and love it! Huge shout out to the students and faculty that put these together. I have a degree in social sciences and currently work in healthcare. I was raised without firearms or knowledge of such in a mostly liberal household. I got my first firearm, a semi auto pistol, a few years ago and immediately fell in love with shooting. I can’t tell you enough how important discussions like these are to me, personally. Gun culture is so much more dynamic and nuanced than the media portrays. Yes, we have issues in this country with violence in general, but the inaminate objects are only a small part of the issue. Human behavior will always be a complicated topic. There are great books/studies by Jennifer Carlson, David Yamane to name couple that don’t just jump on the bandwagon wagon of denouncing gun culture, but rather look into it through participant observation and find all sorts of complexities. I recommend looking into the Liberal Gun Club and their root cause mitigation policies as well. Regardless, thank you. It’s nice to see academia exploring the whole rather than the ignorant narrow that many critics attribute to education. Keep it up!
No state shall convert a liberty into a license, and charge a fee therefore.
Murdock V. Pennsylvania,319 US 105.
If the state converts a right (liberty) into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right (liberty) with impunity.
Shuttles worth V. City of Birmingham,Alabama,373 US 262.
It always seems like these sorts of debates pick the worst representatives of gun owners. While it's got to be tough to defend a position in front of a bunch of people like this, surely you could find someone that at least owns and controls his own firearms rather than stuff his dad has bought for him.
To be fair there the kid had no idea how this was going to go down.
Love that the student hopped up to talk about casual firearm ownership, but like a lot of folks are mentioning in the comments... its kinda a strawman discussion. I'd prefer a better champion. But this probably does represent most pro 2A kids in collage, your beliefs havent been fully formed yet.
I live in Georgia, and I didnt have to get training or anything to get my carry license. There was a background check. I paid the fee. I got my license in 2 weeks.
Im from Arkansas and im amazed at how little knowledge these ppl have about guns!! 💩 The government won't have to take back our guns if ppl don't know or care anything about it! But trust me in the south we take it seriously and I don't hunt because I personally don't like killing anything...i realize its kinda hypocritical but I don't enjoy that part! However gun safety, the gun range, knowledge of your gun, practice with your guns are important! Also storage is very important and everyone I know puts them in a strong/huge gun safe! I mean mine weighs 800 lbs! So nobody that shouldn't have access to guns will not be getting mine!
Wow. Ignorance is bliss hey. This teacher needs to be held to task
Gotta hand it to the guy for having the balls to take center stage in an environment like that.
I'd love to do this as an avid hunter and gun enthusiast.
Pointless, no real questions because they don't know why they object to guns or anything about guns
The ignorance of this is INSANITY!!
Week of September 5th 2023.
This is significant because this is the week that all new Mexican voters should decide to vote out the governor of New Mexico for banning the concealed and open carry of firearms in the Albuquerque area for 30 days.
Hats off to this professor. He's so good even with the little change in body language and vocabulary used.
This is a sociology class I'd be cool being in.
After what was done do you can be where you are today 😂😂😂
I imagine it is hard when you are young and in the spotlight to articulate your position and overall, I think Robert, our gun owner did a good job. I do appreciate the discussion because it actually was a "normal" discussion of the subject of firearm ownership. That said, in response to the question about what's with all the guns, self-defense, recreation, and hunting. It is important to understand the historical context though. The 2nd Amendment is about giving the people arms for self-defense from either a criminal or particularly a tyrannical government. Beyond that, it's fun, like the one young lady on (stage) right said. In response to Parth's question - and keep in mind, I'm 51 and have owned guns since I was 18 - it's easy not to shoot my friends over a disagreement because I'm not a murderer. Guns don't make a person kill. A killer might use a gun, but the motive doesn't come from the firearm . All things said though, I appreciated the conversation and give credit to the professor.
The professor tried to pretend he wasn't framing the issue by saying "I grew up with guns." but then framed by saying "I'm not as crazy as you are."
That professor is annoying . And was bashing the guy but then said " I got you beat , I started at 4 ! Proud professor .
But if you are a criminal none of these rules apply .
Guy 1:"how do you keep yourself from shooting your friend in an argument?"
Guy 2: "do you have a knife at home?"
Guy 1: "yes..."
Guy 2: "how do you keep yourself from stabbing your friend in an argument?"
When someone asks what a .223 is, don't say, "It's a military round". Try, "A .22 is about the smallest diameter bullet commonly found. A .223 is .003 inches bigger in diameter."
How do you keep from shooting people?
Don't point a gun at them....is that ao hard not to do?
Have 73 including 4 ARs...West Virginia...NO permit for concealed here...
I love the concept of an open discussion in the classroom. Let the students discuss their hobbies openly. But it's not really fair to anyone in the room to have him answering technical or legal questions about acquiring/storing/carrying firearms. It would be really helpful to have this exact same discussion, but with an expert in the room to whom the student could defer.