Part 1: Refuting The Slander of a Ḥanafī Māturīdī Jahmī - by Abu Iyaad Amjad Rafiq
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ต.ค. 2024
- Part 1 - The Roots of "Kalām Theology" and Why the Jahmites and Their Offshoots Accuse Ahl al-Sunnah of Being Mujassimah/Mushabbihah (Video, 37 minutes)
Follow us on Twitter
TT...
![[ TEASER ] เงาะป่า - วงL.กฮ. | TMG RECORD](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/M4ObdFfcPww/mqdefault.jpg)
May allah reward you Sheikh. More videos from you are needed, your intelligence shows by your speech and writings.
Allah*, kindly use upper case A as it denotes respect & proper grammar for what is proper names in English. wa Allahu Alim!
@@Salafiyahisthehaqq
How do you mean?
@@SunnahsKnight view : **Tafsīr Surah Al Baqarah ayah 104 "O you who believe.."** - Markaz Umar.
@@SunnahsKnight Who made tabdi on him?
Jazaakumullahu khayraa wa baaraka feekum
Excellent breakdown of the historical roots of Ilm ul kalaam. May Allah reward Sh. Abu Iyaad. Can't wait for part 2.
BarakAllahu Feekum. Much needed academic refutation of the ignoramous deobandi hanafi jahmites by shaykh Abu Iyaad hafithahullah.
Yep
Amazing explanation
May Allah increase you in knowledge
May Allah reward our noble Shaykh with Jannatul firdaous al ala
Jazakallahu khairan ikhwan, please continue this series and refute the other allegations brought against our Aqeedah.
However I think you could have delved into the history of the maturidiyyah more in depth. Barakallahu feek.
جزاك الله خيرا
Great quality and clarity.
Hope more such content is produced regards to Atheism, khawarij and other deviants
Alhamdulillah excellent may Allah bless Abu Iyaad
Jazakallahu khair
These hanafi deobandis have been refuted by salafies with ilm.
I don't call them.hanafi because Abu Hanifa is free from their falsehood
@@beardedbloke2521 True. As there are many Salafis or Ahul-Hadiths who are Hanafis.
well made video
جزاك الله خير
جزاك الله خيرا
جزاك الله خيرا شيخنا
Jazakallāhu khairan
Excellent video 👍🏼
Masha'Allaah excellent video. These issues needed to be addressed because these so called "hanafis" are getting too confident causing doubt on the salafis and their aqeedah.
Wow seems Like Ustadh Abu Iyaad is computer genius too .
Wallah! I had a severe headache from watching the video, not because of the way the Shaykh was explaining may Allah bless Him but their belief.
Qadri deny Allah's siffat due to saying why doesn't Allah stop evil. Allah is Al Hakim as we see in story of Kidr things appear evil, Allah's Siffat help us understand others.
The Mutzailah say each Attribute is a separate being like the idols in Quran 53.19.
Asharis combine these 2 deviations, deny Allah's Siffat Qabr for their own pre conceived notions and see them as parts.
They rely on substance theory as their foundation and call it rationality, after that they filter the holy texts through this ''rational framework'', which in reality is Arestotelian/Greek philosphy.
---
Oh so Juwaini and Fakrudin went back to Jahmis.
I heard Ghazali combined ashari and sufism and alot of them repented!
Assalamu alaykum, came here from br. farid
As salaamu alaykum. Does ustaadh Abu iyyaad have his own TH-cam channel?
wa aleyka salam wa rahmatoullahi wa barakatouh, I dont think he will has I spoked to him years ago and he told me that he dont want to do one ...
@@MuslimLifeFit
Oh ok.
Jazaaka Allahu khayran
@@joshman7784 wa anta fa jaazaka Allahu kheir
He shared it on his telegram channel
@@nofeah89 whats his telegram channel
Now compare the intelligence, the eloquence in speech and the way the proofs are presented and explained by our sheikh Abu iyaad, to the foolish so called "dawah" of Ali (needs) Dawah and Muhammad Hijab.
Wa Allahu al-Mustaan.
Muhammad needs hijab... as in hijab in his speech...
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543
Since you admit that then why do you unite with others who promote him.
He’s not Hanafi Imam Azzam is free from these types of people
In all fairness didn't Imam Ghazali publish a book called "Incoherence of the Philosophers" which attacked philosophy on 20 counts of heresy" ?
I did not know that the Ashari's had Mu'tazilah roots, but that might have been a case of being a victim of those times, when Mu'tazilah beliefs were state sponsored by the Caliphs of that era? There are times when the Ummah improves as it becomes smarter and less exposed to philosophers, and then there are times when people start calling themselves Salafi but they do not resemble that previous generation either. I think this back and forth in our ummah will continue to happen until the day of judgement because we are even worse off without a caliph. Only imam Mahdi will set things straight again for the last time.
The sunnah of Allah is such that he grants the Muslims a righteous, powerful and just ruler after they themselves become righteous. Only Allah can rectify the ummah, and the means is that the Ummah collectively return to righteousness in creed and action. Khilafah is a result of the solution, not the solution itself
It is a **SUNNI** principle in Islam that ayat are taken on apparent meaning until there is another ayat or hadith to take it otherwise. View Quran 6 :82 Tafsir Bukhari ( Athari Aqida) & Quran 3 :7!
Athari Aqida prevents baseless tatil & tawil, not just on Allah's Siffat due to pagan foreign idolator influence awuthubillah, but the idea to do this in general to any ayat & open foreign bida over sunna (see Q 5 :48)
---
• Shaykh al-Islām Abū Ismā’īl al-Harawī (396-481H) said:
❝Passing the report [pertaining to the attribute] upon its apparentness. And this is that the general signposts of Tawḥīd that have come in the reports are left upon their apparentness. [Thereafter] excessive investigation into them should not be undertaken, and nor should any burden be taken to make ta’wīl of them, and nor should their apparent meanings be exceeded [into] tamthīl (likeness). And nor should comprehension [of their realites] or any presumption be asserted regarding them.❞
الدَّرَجَةُ الثّانِيَةُ: إجْراءُ الخَبَرِ عَلى ظاهِرِهِ. وهُوَ أنْ تَبْقى أعْلامُ تَوْحِيدِ العامَّةِ الخَبَرِيَّةِ عَلى ظَواهِرِها. ولا يَتَحَمَّلُ البَحْثُ عَنْها تَعَسُّفًا. ولا يَتَكَلَّفُ لَها تَأْوِيلًا. ولا يَتَجاوَزُ ظَواهِرَها تَمْثِيلًا. ولا يَدَّعِي عَلَيْها إدْراكًا أوْ تَوَهُّمًا.
📚 (Manāzil al-Sā’irīn p. 40)
How is this presentation taking place?, I mean the highlighting and software.
So Abu Iyaad has become a full blown philosopher. The irony.
🤡
What a foolish comment. You either slander him purposefully, or you are simply an individual whose babbling mouth precedes his rational mind. Try not to make a habit of it
No, he's following the Salaf as-Saaliheen in their Creed. Alhumdulillah
Either you are deaf and blind, that you can't see nor hear what sheikh abu Iyaad is explaining, or you are a FULL BLOWN ARROGANT IGNORAMUS!
@@wayfarer387 Couldn't have said it better myself. JazakAllahu khayr
When you believe that Allah is above the throne, you are indicating that he has, naudubillah, a place. So I don't know why you pseudo-salafi/wahhabi people believe this.
Yeah, anything that exists in reality and not just an imaginary being, exists in a place, the only ones who are against this are those who believe in the fallacious Greek theories of bodies and substances, you whole belief system is based on the rhetoric of the pagan greeks.
Also the Quran clearly says that Allah is above his throne, deny this and you'll be a 5 grade kaffir.
@@tayloryoung4974 So Allah has a place, which means he is limited?
@@tayloryoung4974 if something has a place, that means that thing has directions. up, down, right, left.
@@hasakicioguz9312
What do you mean by limited?
And yes, Allah is above his creation, this proven by revelation and by the fitra, anyone who denies this is a disbeliever, this known by necessity in the religion.
@@tayloryoung4974 Why not assign the meaning to Allah instead of taking the literal meaning? Why not just accept that we cannot fully understand some verses and some ahadeeth?