It would be nice, if you want to support my work financially. Thank you very much! Wolfgang M. Schmitt Betreff: DIE FILMANALYSE IBAN: DE29 5745 0120 0130 7858 43 BIC: MALADE51NWD
This film is not about hedonism but about the horrors of a mental disorder. In my opinion, she conjured the 'memory' of her seeing the baby climbing the table as a justification for her whole 'theory of all', where nature and women are evil. Because she was indeed in the room having sex when Nick fell. Everyone is entitled to their own interpretation, but I do believe you missed the mark with hedonism there (it's just not a topic elaborated on in the film) taking the 'memory' at face value. Very well-structured and edifying video though, thank you!
>filters the entire movie through a feminist lens and does not mention any symbolism portrayed in the movie that can’t be easily connected to said reading. “unbiased” 💀
If only he had some camera people who do not suffer from seizures and could hold their cameras tight and calm. Shaky cam makes movies unwatchable and does provide a trashy 90's Blairwitch vibe to every movie, no matter how good the actors or the scripts are.
@@fearofmusic1312 I can see what you mean however I personally don’t agree. In my opinion the way Lars von Trier uses the shaky cam creates a very unsettling grittiness and an atmosphere that suggest that the scene is not meant for you to be watched. It doesn’t have a Blair Witch feeling for me at all. But if it really bothers you that much you can still watch the musical scenes from Dancer in the Dark.
Bro, what she do? I’m gonna guess, a girl you pretended that you were friends with to sleep with rejected you just you’re creepy and now you cry on the internet like a tiny, little baby. Am I close?..
This is sadly, the most pathetic take I have ever seen being forced onto a movie. Not one single concept in this video is supported by the movie. The movie clearly showed us that this woman was a HORRIBLE person. The movie gave us two plausible reasons why: one) she might have been mentally ill; or two) she might have been under the spell of actual witchcraft. The husband, being a therapist, disregarded all of her statements that implied witchcraft. He didn't even acknowledge witchcraft as a possibility, DESPITE her point blank stating she was afraid of Eden, and Eden ONLY, that nature was "Satan's church", that she was having auditory hallucinations when there, that the more she studied the so-called "Gynocide" the more she was convinced that women were evil AND THAT is when the attacks on her began; turning Eden into a place she had loved into a place she feared. On the hike there she began stalling by taking her boot off and later wanting to sleep. As she neared the cabin's woods, at the bridge, she hesitated, then crossed it at a sprint and didn't stop until inside the safety of the cabin and out of the woods. The man began hallucinating once he crossed the bridge. When he slept with his hand outside of the cabin's protection, unprotected in nature, it was covered in ticks. He began having bad dreams. So despite everything she told him and his own mounting evidence that she might be correct, he dismissed her fears with psychology arguments and social norm arguments (- that woman can do no wrong and are the victims of misogyny.) von Trier even spelled Antichrist as: ANTICHRIS♀for crying out loud!! So this was a Witchcraft possession story that was told without ever saying it was a Witchcraft possession story and that YES, women, as a whole, are terrible horrible people. But what did he get out of it? The exact OPPOSITE!
Tsk, tsk. You forgot to complain about his tie's odd shade of yellow and the fact that he fails to sip his whiskey. (Tsk, tsk. Du hast vergessen, dich über den merkwürdigen Gelbton seiner Krawatte und die Tatsache zu beschweren, dass er keinen Schluck von seinem Whiskey trinkt.)
![[DRIP] ‘Woke Up In Tokyo (RUKA & ASA)’ PREVIEW](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QN44lcR_VkI/mqdefault.jpg)
It would be nice, if you want to support my work financially. Thank you very much!
Wolfgang M. Schmitt
Betreff: DIE FILMANALYSE
IBAN: DE29 5745 0120 0130 7858 43
BIC: MALADE51NWD
PayPal: www.paypal.me/filmanalyse
www.patreon.com/wolfgangmschmitt
This film is not about hedonism but about the horrors of a mental disorder. In my opinion, she conjured the 'memory' of her seeing the baby climbing the table as a justification for her whole 'theory of all', where nature and women are evil. Because she was indeed in the room having sex when Nick fell.
Everyone is entitled to their own interpretation, but I do believe you missed the mark with hedonism there (it's just not a topic elaborated on in the film) taking the 'memory' at face value.
Very well-structured and edifying video though, thank you!
The music that plays throughout the film, Lascia Ch'io Pianga is so beautiful ♥
I have to thank the exchange student from Germany for putting me onto Von Treir. One of the best people people I've known.
You did a great job breaking this down in an intelligent and unbiased way. I felt smarter after watching this 😁
>filters the entire movie through a feminist lens and does not mention any symbolism portrayed in the movie that can’t be easily connected to said reading.
“unbiased” 💀
Put classic music and philosophy in a movie and Wolfgang overlooks all weaknesses of the movie
No matter what some people say: Lars von Trier is one of the greatest and most unique filmmakers of our time!
@All Out Of Bubble Gum what makes you disagree?
If only he had some camera people who do not suffer from seizures and could hold their cameras tight and calm. Shaky cam makes movies unwatchable and does provide a trashy 90's Blairwitch vibe to every movie, no matter how good the actors or the scripts are.
@@fearofmusic1312 I can see what you mean however I personally don’t agree. In my opinion the way Lars von Trier uses the shaky cam creates a very unsettling grittiness and an atmosphere that suggest that the scene is not meant for you to be watched. It doesn’t have a Blair Witch feeling for me at all. But if it really bothers you that much you can still watch the musical scenes from Dancer in the Dark.
What is the name of the Clava Fiebish book you mentioned? I unfortunately can not find it online. (ps. amazing analysis thank you)
Das Weiberdorf: Roman aus der Eifel. Novell from Clara Viebig
Onewallfree, my dear Wolle!
Ich freue mich über Deinen Kommentar, leider gibt es heute keinen "Forest Gump - best" Kommentar. Das macht mich traurig.
@@Test-ur9tg Den vermisse ich auch. Vielleicht will er Wolles Algo nicht mehr supporten. Hoffentlich kein "plötzlich und unerwartet".
Zänk ju weri matsch, Mister Schmitt.
As always splendid analysis!
forest gump - worst
this is one of the greatest films of all time
Agreed
Dont take twitter people seriously. Good video. Dont watch the movie.
I think this would be to easy. What's about the beggers and why didn't the fox eat itself entirly and stole the guns?
the messages in lars' films generally go well above the heads of the great unwashed.
no surprise to see the feminists up in arms
Every feminist needs to watch this movie. This movie depicts exactly what women are. GREAT MOVIE ❤
Bro, what she do? I’m gonna guess, a girl you pretended that you were friends with to sleep with rejected you just you’re creepy and now you cry on the internet like a tiny, little baby. Am I close?..
.
This is sadly, the most pathetic take I have ever seen being forced onto a movie. Not one single concept in this video is supported by the movie.
The movie clearly showed us that this woman was a HORRIBLE person. The movie gave us two plausible reasons why: one) she might have been mentally ill; or two) she might have been under the spell of actual witchcraft. The husband, being a therapist, disregarded all of her statements that implied witchcraft. He didn't even acknowledge witchcraft as a possibility, DESPITE her point blank stating she was afraid of Eden, and Eden ONLY, that nature was "Satan's church", that she was having auditory hallucinations when there, that the more she studied the so-called "Gynocide" the more she was convinced that women were evil AND THAT is when the attacks on her began; turning Eden into a place she had loved into a place she feared.
On the hike there she began stalling by taking her boot off and later wanting to sleep. As she neared the cabin's woods, at the bridge, she hesitated, then crossed it at a sprint and didn't stop until inside the safety of the cabin and out of the woods.
The man began hallucinating once he crossed the bridge. When he slept with his hand outside of the cabin's protection, unprotected in nature, it was covered in ticks. He began having bad dreams. So despite everything she told him and his own mounting evidence that she might be correct, he dismissed her fears with psychology arguments and social norm arguments (- that woman can do no wrong and are the victims of misogyny.) von Trier even spelled Antichrist as: ANTICHRIS♀for crying out loud!! So this was a Witchcraft possession story that was told without ever saying it was a Witchcraft possession story and that YES, women, as a whole, are terrible horrible people.
But what did he get out of it? The exact OPPOSITE!
fr. a couple slaps and this movie would've been over so quick, with a very happy ending i might add
Zu stark merkt man, dass hier abgelesen wurde. Da gucke ich mir lieber Forrest Gump an.
schaust du das video nicht des inhalts wegen an, sondern weil du jemanden etwas *nicht* ablesen sehen willst??? ergibt für mich keinen sinn
Tsk, tsk. You forgot to complain about his tie's odd shade of yellow and the fact that he fails to sip his whiskey.
(Tsk, tsk. Du hast vergessen, dich über den merkwürdigen Gelbton seiner Krawatte und die Tatsache zu beschweren, dass er keinen Schluck von seinem Whiskey trinkt.)