@@TedH. When we discuss the vintage ones, it’s really hard to pick the bad ones as even the worst one of that era stands out a glistening beauty compared to the modern trash cans 😃 I hope you get my point Sir. Much respect to you 😇😇😇
@@edb5956 awww! Sir, we highly respect your sentiments for this beauty. We will cover the best ones from the same era and you can certainly compare both videos 😇😇😇
Yep, the Studebaker Starlight Coup was so bad that you can still buy full fiberglass bodies and race chassis for them. The Studebakers dominate road racing events like La Carrera Panamericana .
@@aceroadholder2185 One wag stated that he was thinking leasing a car, something that was done mainly by commercial users, not ordinary folks, and he saw lots of Renaults in the Return lot, but only one Studebaker. He asked which kind of car he should lease, and was told "the Stude".
Ok, here's my Stude' tale: when I was a kid we had a neighbor up the street known just as Mr. Bradley. He was a geezer for sure, but he owned three 'Hawks', a couple '55's and one '56 Super Hawk. That thing had a big V8 and a Hurst 4-speed! When he used to drive by - at 30 mph! - we could hear him coming half a block away. It was beautiful.
Hate and worst are inappropriate in describing these cars. Some weren’t as successful as some others in the market, but none were hated and none were bad. This sounds like AI.
@@alanblanes2876 We respect your sentiments and opinion about these cars. But Sir these were really amongst the disliked ones. We are also doing a documentary over the most loved ones of the same era. You will find them soon 😇 Stay connected till then.
No one thinks the 1957 Rebel is anything less that a sterling, top notch car. It was a limited production model, so its 1500 units had nothing to do with customer acceptance. It was the fastest sedan in 1957.
This video is baloney. In the 1950's these "worst" cars were everywhere. Yep, the Aero Willys "only had 91 hp." It could only do 100mph. The Aero interior shown is not stock. The car had seating for 6, not 5. The Aero continued to be built in Brazil into the 1960s. The Rambler Rebel was quicker than a Corvette in the 1/4 mile. What did hurt the cars from the smaller manufacturers was the unavailability of automatic transmissions because of the GM Hydamatic transmission factory fire.
@@aceroadholder2185 Excellent feedback Sir. Much appreciated. Highly respect your input. Talking about 50s, we are preparing a video on the best of 50s as well. You will certainly enjoy that one too. In that we will discuss the ones that were loved more than these ones and continued in production much longer than these ones.
The Hudson Jet could cruse at 85 MPH and was Ultra durable. People kept them till finally in the early 60's they just got Tired of them. Superior Hudson engineering and duribility.
@@cindynimeskern7994 Yes these are my heart beats seriously. But in 50s & 60s, there were better cars. We are doing a video on that as well. Stay tuned 😇
In the early fifties, my family had the Nash Air Flyte, or the 'Bathtub' Nash. The inside was very spacious and comfortable. I used to think of it as a 'cartoon car' because of the styling.
Those early 1950s Nash ramblers, were given a slight facelift by AMC, and resurrected in the later 1950s!...I owned a used one, back in the late 1970s...it was a one-owner car, very nice shape...But after hitting around 100 thousand miles, the car began to fall apart...stick-shift transmission had issues, tie rods went bad, and parts on my then 20+ year old car were getting scarce. But getting 22-28mpg was nice...I sold that car for what I had paid for it, four years earlier--$900 bucks! I miss my 1959 Rambler American!
@@curbozerboomer1773 Much respect to you Sir. Really appreciate your feedback. And feeling honoured to have such viewership. You are our true audience Sir 😇😇😇
When we were kids we freaked out when we came up behind a Rambler because we would NEVER get to our destination. It was more because of the geezer behind the wheel!
The Willy's Aero was a 6 passenger car. In 1965 our family went from Glendale, CA to Kansas and back. There were 8 in our family, of course the two young ones were babies at that time.
@@AMERICAN-AUTOS Thanking him for what? The mispronunciation? The name of the founder of Willys-Overland Motors was John North Willys. As Jeff stated above, it is pronounced "Willis." The "y" stood in for an "i". You don't seem to know much of anything about cars or their history, especially if you think the Studebaker Golden Hawk and the '57 Ford were ever considered ugly cars. The '57 Ford outsold the '57 Chevy. I actually think the Ford is a better-looking car.
You don't know s--t from Shinola. These were great cars. The only problem with them was the fact that people didn't want small cars back then, and the Hudson Jet's clumsy side trim. The Rambler was doing a great job selling to the few who did, leaving no room for the other compacts. Also hurting them was the shortage of HydraMatic transmissions from GM. The plant burned down, and by about 1951, you simply had to offer an automatic transmission. Rambler weathered that problem OK because many Nash buyers wanted stick/OD, even on their full-size cars.
@@HotRodReverend Get some fresh air dude. Or bring if possible your own list and make a video on that one. You are right that you don’t even know. You actually know just to bark at things just to release your mental illness. Looser!
My wife when she was a preteen did a cross country family trip in a Nash Ambassador. My 1st car was going to be a used Golden Hawk but my father didn't think a 300 hp car would be a good 1st car for a 16 yo 😢 And the Rambler had a cool song about it, beep beep, how do I get this out of 2nd gear 😅
The Rambler Rebel was our first family car and we loved it. So far you have shown nearly every affordable car made in the 50s so just what did you like?
We have a 61 Nash Metrpolitan. My wife thought it was cute. Great little car. Super reliable, and good on gas. We drive it a lot, and people love looking at it. Slow, but fun at a bargain price.
The "boxy" look of all these cars detracted from their look. It took automobile manufacturers a long time to abandon this old design trope. For years and years, men's fashion dictated they wear hats. Cars were designed so that men wouldn't have to take off their hats getting into or out of the cars -- thus the boxy" design. I think Chrysler cars were the last to abandon "hat cars", even though men's hats started going out of style after WWII. That may have had something to do with Buick displacing Plymouth as the #3 car in sales in 1955. My Dad sold Buicks in 1955 and had his best year ever!
@@mikkibaker6907 This is an excellent analysis of that era. Very compact & to the point market analysis. You can be our script writer for 50s to 70s era. 😇
These cars would be considered collectable now, but I get the point is how they would have been judged when they were built. Edsel for sure is one in that category
A lot of these cars ended up as drag cars or stock cars in the late 50s thru mid/late 60s. Especially the Willys and Studebaker, along with the Henry J. Not the Edsel though. A friend of my dad had an Edsel when they were new. They might have looked even worse in person than the pictures. Dad raced Studebaker's for 2 or 3 years in the late 50s & early 60s. I think I remember that he said they had good motors with a lot of low end torque. Also raced Hudsons for a year or 2 and made a rail dragster using a Hudson Straight 8 engine. Dad had a 57 Skyliner, it was a damn nice car for the time. Got his with a Continental Kit for the spare tire.
I liked the Nash's, I thought they looked pretty neat. 🤪Ford Skyliner ......really.....that was a neat car too. 😏 And I was one of those that actually liked the Edsel!😛
Should've kept my 57 chevy...i was 18 or 19 then. Love my 2015 Subaru Legacy. Pretty much middle trim line. C. 120k miles now. Extremely reliable. Dealership good to us.
The promo picture said ugly cars, but most of these were very stylish. Maybe they weren't economically successful, but they were not ugly. To me (and ugly is very subjective) the ugliest car of the 50s was the 1959 Fords. Both Ford cars and pickups were some of the ugliest cars to make it onto the highways. My favorite of the one's shown was the Studebaker. That was like the coolest car ever.
The Hudson was a class act! The Rambler American and the Nash were amazing. The Edsel was a dog...especially the push button transmissions. The Avanti was decades ahead of its time.
I remember most of these vehicles, some with fondness. Yeah we made fun of the Edsel's grill, looks like it sucked on a lemon. There was also the Kaiser Henry J. , I don't remember too many of them on the streets. Some of the competition for those under powered cars were the early imports, VW, Renault, or Peugeot. None of them had much horsepower either but the dealerships had waiting lists for some. My dad bought a used '57 VW before his name came up on the waiting list for a '56 model. 36 horsepower made a Nash seem like a powerhouse.
I would kill a puppy for a 1956 Golden Hawk. I was a teenager in 1956 and thought then, and still do, that the Hawk was extremely cool. It could really get up and go.
@@johncolette6014 it must be a design introduction on trial that eventually failed. Some other cars also did that but it couldn’t stand the test of time.
The Nash cars all seemed to be almost great but kept just missing the mark, while the Edsel suffered from bad timing, a mediocre model and a really bad name.
Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder, and you don’t know crap. They say things like this to get a reaction out of people, but the joke’s on them because people will say things anyways.
"Why so ugly" is the question I would like to ask Toyota stylists. Even more so, what is this sloppy love affair American car buyers have with ugly Japanese cars?
Nutty video where the narration is about a model with a certain engine...and the engine in the video of that model is 100% completely different. What are viewers to get from this? Describing a weak straight six while showing a V8....
“Worst” is way too strong describing these cars. Yes, some had mechanical or ascetic problems, but being called worst brings to mind they were downright terrible, which they weren’t. For instance the Le Femme. It wasn’t a terrible car, just a stupid marketing failure.
Had my skyliner for years and never had any problem with it. The 3 main things that could affect how the top worked was low battery, parked on unlevel surface and cold temperatures.
Crosley cars, in general, were under powered, poorly designed clunkers. It looked like it was built in a dirt floor garage, on a Saturday afternoon, from scrap parts, by a drunk. Other than that, it was just a loser. Courtesy of Half Vast Flying
Id like to own any of theses cars today.
@@TedH. When we discuss the vintage ones, it’s really hard to pick the bad ones as even the worst one of that era stands out a glistening beauty compared to the modern trash cans 😃
I hope you get my point Sir.
Much respect to you 😇😇😇
Agree!
ME TOO!!!
Did people back then say that, I think not. A lot of the ones shown here were considered absolutely un-sellable back when they came out, but now yes.
The Studebaker was an awesome car. My father in law owned one for many years.
.....not the Studebaker, awesome in every way and years ahead of many of the larger manufacturers
@@edb5956 awww! Sir, we highly respect your sentiments for this beauty. We will cover the best ones from the same era and you can certainly compare both videos 😇😇😇
Yep, the Studebaker Starlight Coup was so bad that you can still buy full fiberglass bodies and race chassis for them. The Studebakers dominate road racing events like La Carrera Panamericana .
@@aceroadholder2185 Thank You for the feedback 😇
@@aceroadholder2185 One wag stated that he was thinking leasing a car, something that was done mainly by commercial users, not ordinary folks, and he saw lots of Renaults in the Return lot, but only one Studebaker. He asked which kind of car he should lease, and was told "the Stude".
Ok, here's my Stude' tale: when I was a kid we had a neighbor up the street known just as Mr. Bradley. He was a geezer for sure, but he owned three 'Hawks', a couple '55's and one '56 Super Hawk. That thing had a big V8 and a Hurst 4-speed! When he used to drive by - at 30 mph! - we could hear him coming half a block away. It was beautiful.
Hate and worst are inappropriate in describing these cars. Some weren’t as successful as some others in the market, but none were hated and none were bad. This sounds like AI.
No No, it’s not AI. It’s a human voice over. And, we really appreciate your remarks and feedback. 😇😇😇
@@AMERICAN-AUTOS The narrator sounds real. The narrative is so amateurish , it sounds like AI.
@@T-41 Oh I get your point now. Thank You for the feedback. We will definitely improve it.
Stay connected 😇😇
Or a rice lover.
@@michaelbenardo5695 🤔
The ad hominem approach you are taking, suggesting people 'hated' these cars is an absurdity. They are absolute highlights in the history of cars.
@@alanblanes2876 We respect your sentiments and opinion about these cars. But Sir these were really amongst the disliked ones.
We are also doing a documentary over the most loved ones of the same era. You will find them soon 😇
Stay connected till then.
No one thinks the 1957 Rebel is anything less that a sterling, top notch car. It was a limited production model, so its 1500 units had nothing to do with customer acceptance. It was the fastest sedan in 1957.
@@alanblanes2876 Much much respect to you & to your feedback. You are a genuine audience to us.
A girl I went to school with had a Rambler Rebel, that car was fast, really fast.
Every one of theses cars has more character than present day cars.
Totally uninformed video.
@@ramblergarage That’s really not helpful at all. Please make it informed 😇
Thank You
The Golden Hawk was FAST!
@@mikkibaker6907 Thank You 🙏
Love the Hawk!
@@davidrich9896 Thank You Sir.
The Studebaker Golen Hawk was my favorite as a kid. My aunt had one and I thought it was the coolest car on the planet.
@ yes exactly 👍
This video is baloney. In the 1950's these "worst" cars were everywhere. Yep, the Aero Willys "only had 91 hp." It could only do 100mph. The Aero interior shown is not stock. The car had seating for 6, not 5. The Aero continued to be built in Brazil into the 1960s.
The Rambler Rebel was quicker than a Corvette in the 1/4 mile.
What did hurt the cars from the smaller manufacturers was the unavailability of automatic transmissions because of the GM Hydamatic transmission factory fire.
@@aceroadholder2185 Excellent feedback Sir.
Much appreciated. Highly respect your input.
Talking about 50s, we are preparing a video on the best of 50s as well. You will certainly enjoy that one too.
In that we will discuss the ones that were loved more than these ones and continued in production much longer than these ones.
Cars for everyone’s preference & pocketbook back then in the boom years after WWII
@@TomSpeaks-vw1zp highly appreciate that Sir.
Maybe if the Rambler had an open front wheel well it would have looked better.
@@TomSpeaks-vw1zp Maybe. But we never know Sir, what it had missed in that configuration 😇
Stay connected. Your feedback is always appreciated
My 6th grade teacher had a golden hawk and it was beautiful
The Hudson Jet could cruse at 85 MPH and was Ultra durable. People kept them till finally in the early 60's they just got Tired of them.
Superior Hudson engineering and duribility.
Thank You Sir.
The Golden Hawk looks cool .
@@timshelby2324 Thank You
All Studebakers were years ahead of other car companies, in design! That might
have been the reason for that company's downfall!
They were not ugly cars. They were so cool.
@@cindynimeskern7994 Yes these are my heart beats seriously. But in 50s & 60s, there were better cars.
We are doing a video on that as well. Stay tuned 😇
The 10 worst looking cars from the 50's are better looking than the awful looking cars they make now. The 40's were even better looking.
They were all works of art. All people want today is some black on black on black with the rest blacked out.
In the early fifties, my family had the Nash Air Flyte, or the 'Bathtub' Nash. The inside was very spacious and comfortable. I used to think of it as a 'cartoon car' because of the styling.
@@jessebaldwin2661 Love it Sir. Made our day. We always feel accomplished when we bring back some good old memories. 😇😇😇
Those early 1950s Nash ramblers, were given a slight facelift by AMC, and resurrected in the later 1950s!...I owned a used one, back in the late 1970s...it was a one-owner car, very nice shape...But after hitting around 100 thousand miles, the car began to fall apart...stick-shift transmission had issues, tie rods went bad, and parts on my then 20+ year old car were getting scarce. But getting 22-28mpg was nice...I sold that car for what I had paid for it, four years earlier--$900 bucks! I miss my 1959 Rambler American!
@@curbozerboomer1773 Much respect to you Sir. Really appreciate your feedback. And feeling honoured to have such viewership. You are our true audience Sir 😇😇😇
Too bad you didn't go completely through it. Sounds like it was only casually maintained.
@@jamesbosworth4191 time restrictions sir.
When we were kids we freaked out when we came up behind a Rambler because we would NEVER get to our destination. It was more because of the geezer behind the wheel!
No way is the Skyliner ugly.
The Willy's Aero was a 6 passenger car. In 1965 our family went from Glendale, CA to Kansas and back. There were 8 in our family, of course the two young ones were babies at that time.
Total bullshit and blather. This is some of what we can expect from AI.
@@robertstine2182 you saw some mirror dude.
It’s not AI.
I liked all of these. They were not popular and did not sell well, and some were ugly or just poor cars. But hated? No.
@@stevenpollard5171 Thank You Sir.
Try buying a 57 ford sky liner now for less than $80K.
It's not pronounced "Willees,". It's pronounced "Willis". It was a family's last name
@@jeffchandler3390 Thank you Sir 😇
We highly appreciate your feedback
I've only ever heard it pronounced Willies
@@ericsneary5430 Thank You 🙏
@@ericsneary5430 i know, but it's wrong.
@@AMERICAN-AUTOS Thanking him for what? The mispronunciation? The name of the founder of Willys-Overland Motors was John North Willys. As Jeff stated above, it is pronounced "Willis." The "y" stood in for an "i". You don't seem to know much of anything about cars or their history, especially if you think the Studebaker Golden Hawk and the '57 Ford were ever considered ugly cars. The '57 Ford outsold the '57 Chevy. I actually think the Ford is a better-looking car.
91 hp in 1950 was not at all unusual. This is another gar*age video.
@@stevenleek1254 Good night Sir.
Have some peace ☮️
Let's call it what it is: B. S. This video is full of misinformation, and does not inspire "peace."
You don't know s--t from Shinola. These were great cars. The only problem with them was the fact that people didn't want small cars back then, and the Hudson Jet's clumsy side trim. The Rambler was doing a great job selling to the few who did, leaving no room for the other compacts. Also hurting them was the shortage of HydraMatic transmissions from GM. The plant burned down, and by about 1951, you simply had to offer an automatic transmission. Rambler weathered that problem OK because many Nash buyers wanted stick/OD, even on their full-size cars.
@@jamesbosworth4191 go make your own video. Watch that and clap for yourself
😊@@AMERICAN-AUTOSJealous?
@@michaelbenardo5695 hahaha 🤣
@@AMERICAN-AUTOS Dude, if you want to make videos, first make sure you know what you are talking about.
@@jamesbosworth4191 Thank You
Undoubtedly one of the 10 worst TH-cam video uploads on 50s automobiles... I do not even know where to start!
@@HotRodReverend Get some fresh air dude. Or bring if possible your own list and make a video on that one.
You are right that you don’t even know. You actually know just to bark at things just to release your mental illness.
Looser!
It's better if you mute the idiotic voice-over.
@@Conrad.99 never mind
This is jam packed with bullshit
@@license2kilttheplaidlad640 The only bullshit here is you Mr. Lad 640
@@AMERICAN-AUTOS No, he's right.
@@jsat5609 another one joins here 🤣🤣🤣
Poor, redundant writing.
@@garyfrancis6193 Thank You 🙏
My wife when she was a preteen did a cross country family trip in a Nash Ambassador.
My 1st car was going to be a used Golden Hawk but my father didn't think a 300 hp car would be a good 1st car for a 16 yo 😢
And the Rambler had a cool song about it, beep beep, how do I get this out of 2nd gear 😅
The '56 Hawk? My dreams are smashed! Still, the reasons given weren't very convincing.
These cars are beautiful ,and are now lovely classics. So much more enduring than cars of today.
Who can’t love a hawk
@@davidlockley2635 We love it today 😇. The video is representative of the people who lived and used these cars.
I like all 10 of these!
The new ugly car has to be the Tesla cars.
Will Tesla ever change its design?
These cars had style in their day. Unlike some of the new UGLS such as Kia and Hyundia
The Edsel that you talk about was made from 1958-60. The 1957 Rambler was never consider a "muscle car because they didn't exist until 1964
@@Genoveze-66 Thank You for your feedback. Highly appreciated 😇
The Rambler Rebel was our first family car and we loved it. So far you have shown nearly every affordable car made in the 50s so just what did you like?
We have a 61 Nash Metrpolitan.
My wife thought it was cute.
Great little car.
Super reliable, and good on gas.
We drive it a lot, and people love looking at it.
Slow, but fun at a bargain price.
@@garyhoward2490 Nice to know that 😇
The Edsel was also called a "Studabaker sucking a lemon"!
I'd take any one of these old cars over any present day modern car. They were all beautifully designed and were easy to work on.
The "boxy" look of all these cars detracted from their look. It took automobile manufacturers a long time to abandon this old design trope. For years and years, men's fashion dictated they wear hats. Cars were designed so that men wouldn't have to take off their hats getting into or out of the cars -- thus the boxy" design. I think Chrysler cars were the last to abandon "hat cars", even though men's hats started going out of style after WWII. That may have had something to do with Buick displacing Plymouth as the #3 car in sales in 1955. My Dad sold Buicks in 1955 and had his best year ever!
@@mikkibaker6907 This is an excellent analysis of that era. Very compact & to the point market analysis.
You can be our script writer for 50s to 70s era. 😇
These cars would be considered collectable now, but I get the point is how they would have been judged when they were built. Edsel for sure is one in that category
A very enjoyable video
@@alvincash3230 Thank You ☺️
The Dodge La femme, as one of the "100 million dollar Chryslers" still looks gorgous.
Also the original ('57) Edsel looks great!
There was no ‘57 Edsel. First year was ‘58.
@roberttroutman6780 Yes, but as alsays, the 1957 Edsels were "model year" 1958...
A lot of these cars ended up as drag cars or stock cars in the late 50s thru mid/late 60s. Especially the Willys and Studebaker, along with the Henry J. Not the Edsel though. A friend of my dad had an Edsel when they were new. They might have looked even worse in person than the pictures. Dad raced Studebaker's for 2 or 3 years in the late 50s & early 60s. I think I remember that he said they had good motors with a lot of low end torque. Also raced Hudsons for a year or 2 and made a rail dragster using a Hudson Straight 8 engine. Dad had a 57 Skyliner, it was a damn nice car for the time. Got his with a Continental Kit for the spare tire.
I liked the Nash's, I thought they looked pretty neat. 🤪Ford Skyliner ......really.....that was a neat car too. 😏 And I was one of those that actually liked the Edsel!😛
Should've kept my 57 chevy...i was 18 or 19 then.
Love my 2015 Subaru Legacy. Pretty much middle trim line.
C. 120k miles now. Extremely reliable.
Dealership good to us.
There are few as stupid as those who judge the past by the current and temporal, standards of today.
The Nash Airflite was the perfect cartoon car.
The "ugly" cars of the 50s are beautiful compared to the junk today
0:22 It's "Willis" NOT "Willies."
@@jsat5609 Thank You
The promo picture said ugly cars, but most of these were very stylish. Maybe they weren't economically successful, but they were not ugly. To me (and ugly is very subjective) the ugliest car of the 50s was the 1959 Fords. Both Ford cars and pickups were some of the ugliest cars to make it onto the highways.
My favorite of the one's shown was the Studebaker. That was like the coolest car ever.
Thank You for watching Sir.
Whoever decided to put the Studebaker Golden Hawk on this list of worst cars is clueless. Only reason given was that it was expensive.
The Hudson was a class act! The Rambler American and the Nash were amazing. The Edsel was a dog...especially the push button transmissions. The Avanti was decades ahead of its time.
I remember most of these vehicles, some with fondness. Yeah we made fun of the Edsel's grill, looks like it sucked on a lemon. There was also the Kaiser Henry J. , I don't remember too many of them on the streets. Some of the competition for those under powered cars were the early imports, VW, Renault, or Peugeot. None of them had much horsepower either but the dealerships had waiting lists for some. My dad bought a used '57 VW before his name came up on the waiting list for a '56 model. 36 horsepower made a Nash seem like a powerhouse.
You seem to have missed the Nash Metropolitan, small underpowered and inconvenient, you had to access the trunk through the back seat.
@@Lagassejames Yes that’s another one. Very true 😇
A 57 Ford Skyliner is not cool what is wrong with you dude do you know how sought after those cars are now you don't have a clue
Where's the green car that was pictured on the thumbnail? It looked crazy cool!
I would kill a puppy for a 1956 Golden Hawk. I was a teenager in 1956 and thought then, and still do, that the Hawk was extremely cool. It could really get up and go.
Studebakers were far ahead of their time from the longest manufacturer of all time starting with Conostoga wagons
8 seconds in, "these flops cannot be ignored".
Obviously, they were.😂😂😂
Hudson Airflite was designed for travelling salesmen -- saved the cost of a motel.
The LAPD had a fleet of Nash Aerflughts.
@@notme123 wow, that’s amazing.
Worst is a relative term; some of these were innovative, and were part of their era.
The later Willys were not the best looking, and I always wondered why that particular Nash did not have normal, exposed wheel wells. 2:40
@@johncolette6014 it must be a design introduction on trial that eventually failed.
Some other cars also did that but it couldn’t stand the test of time.
The Nash cars all seemed to be almost great but kept just missing the mark, while the Edsel suffered from bad timing, a mediocre model and a really bad name.
Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder, and you don’t know crap. They say things like this to get a reaction out of people, but the joke’s on them because people will say things anyways.
I remember ALL OF THEM NONE of which caught on!
@@gordon-n6s much respect to you Sir. 😇
As we all know, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, so I think ugliest was the Edsel any of the 3 years produced.
I was born in 49 as a kid my brother and i knew all the cars. We never liked anything Rambler or AMC built. Ugly...cars. i must agree with you.
Don't forget the Henry j😊
@@larrymaxwell8565 Ok Sir.
Maybe next time 🙂
My Dad bought one!💙
Henry J was the Yugo of its day.
@@AMERICAN-AUTOS wow!
@@nancyjaplon4909 hope he liked it
"Why so ugly" is the question I would like to ask Toyota stylists. Even more so, what is this sloppy love affair American car buyers have with ugly Japanese cars?
@@danieljohnson9351 very true concern. Sir, we show the American cars only. Japanese vehicle didn’t invade in the 50s though. 😇
@@AMERICAN-AUTOS "Invade"is an appropriate word in this case.
Nutty video where the narration is about a model with a certain engine...and the engine in the video of that model is 100% completely different. What are viewers to get from this? Describing a weak straight six while showing a V8....
“Worst” is way too strong describing these cars. Yes, some had mechanical or ascetic problems, but being called worst brings to mind they were downright terrible, which they weren’t. For instance the Le Femme. It wasn’t a terrible car, just a stupid marketing failure.
If you really hate it, I'll take the Hawk off your hands.
Cadillac 1959 on my list .
Not a good video. Who says what is ugly or not. To each there own..
Stop showing car show modded freaks.
@@glennspreeman1634 that’s a bit bitter 🙂
Had my skyliner for years and never had any problem with it. The 3 main things that could affect how the top worked was low battery, parked on unlevel surface and cold temperatures.
Jeder PKW ist wunderschön!
@@SaihtamEseiw Thank You ☺️
Airflyte was one of the first mass produced unibody
@@stevenleek1254 very True.
12:31 1950's Lois Lane's car.
@@fomfom9779 Thank You for watching 🙂
Crosley cars, in general, were under powered, poorly designed clunkers. It looked like it was built in a dirt floor garage, on a Saturday afternoon, from scrap parts, by a drunk. Other than that, it was just a loser.
Courtesy of Half Vast Flying
yes embarrasingly uninformed
I’d love to own any of them. Maybe they weren’t popular, but worst? Total BS.
Who keeps making these videos? They're not reliable information and highly opinionated...
The Crosby reminds me of a Triumph TR3.
@@csrrjefflloyd6496 we are really glad to bring back some good old memories 😇😇😇
All these cars are cool every single one of them is cool this is clickbait
The Edsel had 3 model years, not 2.
You know so little about the Nash Rambler. Produced for 6 years, not 4. Body styles included a station wagon.
Where is the Henry J?
@@Al-thecarhistorian Thank You 🙏
Henry J will be coming soon
I always thought Edsels were cool.
Right away not correct or interesting.
redo your looking sir another beautiful car
sorry thumbs down on this one
1950 Nash was a great car as was Studebaker Hawk. This list is bogus.
The edsel was a great looking car, just look at a chrystler! ewwwwwwwwwww
@@briansmith-l1q 😅😅😅
Edsel for me.
@@rayunseitig6367 Thank You 🙏
Why are you showing some souped up customs when talking about the originals. This makes no sense to anyone.
Nash Airflyte u mean Ambassador
So where's the thumbnail? CLICKBAIT!
@@RichardBarnett-hs1qy Thank You
4:58 say that again
@@epice6463 Thank You 🙏
@@AMERICAN-AUTOS golden what?
@@epice6463 ??
@@AMERICAN-AUTOS it sounds like you’re saying Hawk tuah
@@epice6463 hahahaha