Final score was 456,247,933,403,136. The best hand read 0 because it's probably handling the number in a 32 bit variable that overflows at 2 trillion and change.
32 bit int max is 2-4 ish (signed vs unsigned) BILLION, not trillion. Hafu's winning hand from the invitational was actually above the signed 32 bit integer max
it overflowing wouldn't cause it to show 0, considering how many times it would be overflowing the end score would just be somewhere in the 32bit integer value range
Invisible joker is for sure gonna get changed to be unable to target itself, unless they leave it in as a funny haha because the odds you find the combo unseeded is rare to say the least
@@darkpuppetlordfulTbqh making it not copy the charge of the card would make it less interesting with all the other Jokers. It would suck if copying a charged-up Obelisk just got you one that had a 1x multiplier. Making it so that it can only turn into a copy of another Joker makes way more sense imo.
@ysqure3 I mean they could easily program it so it can copy build up from obelisk but not the charges from itself like they are likely two different values in the code that can be differentiated
@@darkpuppetlordful Sure, but I also would want to minimize the number of exceptions and special cases associated with the card. "Invisible joker creates an exact copy of a joker, except it can't copy invisible joker" is pretty simple. Making it so that it copies some aspects of a joker but not other aspects would make it much harder to understand. Making it so that the rules for which parts it copies depends on the card is even more complicated.
for anyone interested or curious. They probably show it as a simplified version of the number (4552e17) but its still probably saved as a long. And 450 is way outta range of a long (roughly 3 trillion i think) thats why it broke
From what Ive found in my game a steel card will trigger again if hacked (Im not sure about red seal) So its possible a red seal steel 2,3,4, or 5 will tirigger the 1.5 times bonus a bunch of times...
so the ideal hand with 4 polychrome hacks and a polychrome bull would be 5 glass 5's of a kind with red seals, with the rest of your hand being steel 2, 3, 4 or 5's with red seals. potential boons being having negative jokers that add to the total and the voucher that increases hand size.
150,767,310,753,371 was the total earnings of that big ass jackpot with the flush five. Also known as one hundred and fifty trillion, seven hundred and sixty-seven billion, three hundred and ten million, seven hundred and fifty-three thousand, three hundred and seventy-one. Say that ten tines fast.
Def could have gotten some value by upgrading flush five. Levelling n times is roughly an n times multiplier. Running the numbers, Bull is definitely better than another hack. Bull, in taking you from 200 to 20,000 is a 100x mult, whereas 5 more glass cards is just 32x.
Can you maybe hover a bit longer over the Joker, i am not a veteran in Balatro and dont know all the specs of the jokers. That would be nice, thnx. Btw nice videos. Greetings from Germany :D
I had a run not as good but fun because it was low numbers was (uncommon mut card), Fib, Hack, Fib(invis ghost copy), Baseballcard. Not the most insane run ever but it's fun winning with like low numbers and 5's and having it trigger over and over again.
"Add Polychrome to a random Joker, destroy all other Jokers" is a weird way to write an effect. Because as you just did, you can just sell all the Jokers you don't want, and then you both get money instead of destroying Jokers *and* you get to choose which Joker you keep.
It still gets the intended effect of you losing all your jokers just to get polychrome on a joker. I agree with you that they should just have let you select which joker you wanted to save tho. as I was typing this, I realised that selling all the other jokers would still be the better play since you get money for it. I have no idea why they did what they did.
@@SolarPoweredAlien i don't think theres any other effects that have you select a joker, thats probably why i was thinking it would make more sense for it to just say "sell all other jokers" so you don't have to do it yourself, but also that would cause issues with things like invisible joker (and maybe other sell triggers) so honestly just destroying is probably the simplest
it doesn't matter where it is, so long it's not in the first position, that would mess up the combo a little it would double the chips, but at the cost of not triggering the glass cards again, which would be 2^5 multiplier missed to the bull's 2 if moved in the first position.
if you look closely at the order the hacks triggered in, they don't activate when the joker row triggers, they activate when the *card* triggers, meaning a "adds x mult" joker would activate after all the cards had triggered no matter where it was (but an "adds x mult when y card is played" joker would be different, since it triggers when the cards do)
Correct me if I'm wrong but wouldn't he have been way better off putting the bull in the left most position so its effect was copied, essentially doubling his chips? His mult was already in the hundreds of millions so why bother copying the effect of the hack card when you could get so much more value from raising the total chips?
"x2 mult" is basically the same as multiplying the whole thing by two, since multiplication is commutative [i.e. (2x(1000x5) is the same as (2x1000)x5] a second bull would multiply the end result by two once (by doubling the chips), a second hack multiplies the end result by two _five times_ (by doubling the mult once for each glass 2)
He had, at the outset, miscellaneous jokers plus one that, on arrival at a specified condition, copies a random joker on sale. The apparent "intended use" of this joker is to, likely early in a run, copy a valuable joker to compound the effect; however, consummated prerequisites are copied in addition to the other attributes of the card. At the bottom of the screen was a tarot card which duplicates a random joker alongside and satisfied conditions. If only a single joker exists, the random effect necessarily targets it as no other option exists. Selling all the aforementioned miscellaneous jokers left the player with only that which duplicates as its exclusive function. The tarot card is, then, played necessarily, as the player owns only the single joker, duplicating the card whose only function is to duplicate on sale another joker. This leaves the player with exactly two identical jokers with the following property: when this card is sold (bearing in mind that a sale actually provides the player with funds), duplicate a random (bearing in mind that the only other joker itself duplicates when sold) joker. When the first joker is sold, two events occur: the player accrues funds, then the other joker (which also duplicates on sale) is duplicated. This provides the player with the funds and an additional joker that can be sold for funds and a copy that serves it's own function. This works because there are exactly two copies of the duplicating joker. If any card apart from the duplicating joker exists, the chance exists that it, rather than the duplicating joker, will be copied leaving the player with two identical non-duplicating jokers and a single duplicating joker on whose sale, now, a third copy of the non -duplicating joker will be provided. If, on the other hand, the player only has a single duplicating joker, the sale will catalyze the duplication effect with no other card to duplicate providing the player with only the sale price. Looking at it slightly more abstractly, what you will see is that the balance of a sale mechanism in a game is the severance of ownership (principally alienability and use) is compensated by the provision of funds as in a real-world market. In the typical case, the player loses ownership interest in a mundane object, such as a multiplicative modifier in the case in this game, in exchange for the funds; however, in this situation, the player is provided two sorts of funds in exchange for alienation: the money as well as a card of equal value indistinguishable from the card sold. The player can now sell the replacement object just as it had the first.
99% of gamblers quit right before they break the economy
clearly skoottie doesn't
i thought i commented without realizing it , but ur pfp is a different character
GFD
so high of a score it broke the game. It said your best hand at the end was "0" lmao
I think that's just a consequence of doing a seeded run
@@voidspace662 Or int overflow if best hand uses int32
@@michasokoowski6651 int overflow is e308 so no
Looking at the source code shows this is true @michasokoowski6651
The instant cut from $147 to $10.7k is so funny after watching this live
How long did it take?
@@FayezButts Close to an hour. He also set up a macro so that he didn't have to click continuously.
Good thing he had a macro cuz that's over 4000 clicks
Final score was 456,247,933,403,136. The best hand read 0 because it's probably handling the number in a 32 bit variable that overflows at 2 trillion and change.
32 bit int max is 2-4 ish (signed vs unsigned) BILLION, not trillion. Hafu's winning hand from the invitational was actually above the signed 32 bit integer max
He got a low million score earlier in the stream that said best hand was 0
Yeah it says 0 cause it's seeded run
What if he would’ve gotten those 2 extra dollars from selling the tarot card?
it overflowing wouldn't cause it to show 0, considering how many times it would be overflowing the end score would just be somewhere in the 32bit integer value range
Invisible joker is for sure gonna get changed to be unable to target itself, unless they leave it in as a funny haha because the odds you find the combo unseeded is rare to say the least
id say make it copy but like in 0/3 state and to make it useful make it create 2 in this case but idk might be too convoluted
@@ilovehumongoushonkersyeah it copying the card but not the charges solves the problem while keeping some fun
@@darkpuppetlordfulTbqh making it not copy the charge of the card would make it less interesting with all the other Jokers. It would suck if copying a charged-up Obelisk just got you one that had a 1x multiplier. Making it so that it can only turn into a copy of another Joker makes way more sense imo.
@ysqure3 I mean they could easily program it so it can copy build up from obelisk but not the charges from itself like they are likely two different values in the code that can be differentiated
@@darkpuppetlordful Sure, but I also would want to minimize the number of exceptions and special cases associated with the card. "Invisible joker creates an exact copy of a joker, except it can't copy invisible joker" is pretty simple. Making it so that it copies some aspects of a joker but not other aspects would make it much harder to understand. Making it so that the rules for which parts it copies depends on the card is even more complicated.
Im not sure but i think this guy is counting cards
When your hands hit scientific notation, you know you're good.
When your hand hits an integer overflow, you know you're insane.
bro you gonna get kicked out the casino!!!
just when i finally understood backpack battles this game drops lol
The hits keep coming, but the wide eyed fear at seeing the death mistake.
But the Arbitrarily Large Number as an MTG Combo player made me happy to see
YT frogs don’t get to see the solid half hour of skoottie failing to set up a macro
We saw him failing to turn it off tho 😂
physical pain at 20:07
rest in peace
That was scary… best balatro video on TH-cam
You had a real Let’s Game It Out moment here. “Hold please “
for anyone interested or curious. They probably show it as a simplified version of the number (4552e17) but its still probably saved as a long. And 450 is way outta range of a long (roughly 3 trillion i think) thats why it broke
From what Ive found in my game a steel card will trigger again if hacked (Im not sure about red seal) So its possible a red seal steel 2,3,4, or 5 will tirigger the 1.5 times bonus a bunch of times...
so the ideal hand with 4 polychrome hacks and a polychrome bull would be 5 glass 5's of a kind with red seals, with the rest of your hand being steel 2, 3, 4 or 5's with red seals. potential boons being having negative jokers that add to the total and the voucher that increases hand size.
Hack says each PLAYED 2, 3, 4, or 5
Fun fact: the score for the final hand was just shy of 3 times larger than the hand before it (2.997x to be exact)
best hand "0" LMAO
We may have be in intro poverty in Super Auto Pets content, but we eating well with this extra long one
I opened my TH-cam and just said “balatro” and this video just popped up. Thank you Skoottie
My favorite combo is
Splash
(All cards in a hand are scoring cards)
Pareidolia
(All cards are face cards)
Smiley face
(Face cards give +4 multiplier)
INTROS ARE BACK!
Oh sure, the intro comes back when you set a record 😊
That is some wild determination, repeating that 2,200 times.
25:10 CONFIRMED: Skootie is the anime boss of Balatro
What a save! Or technically unsaved lol.
Putting the wrong card on the right. We've all done it.
150,767,310,753,371 was the total earnings of that big ass jackpot with the flush five. Also known as one hundred and fifty trillion, seven hundred and sixty-seven billion, three hundred and ten million, seven hundred and fifty-three thousand, three hundred and seventy-one. Say that ten tines fast.
Oh... and the second one is even bigger. 450 trillion, absolutely ridiculous.
Did you sell those jokers for aprox. 47 mins?
The mark blind was literally just sent 10000000 light years away from that move
20:00 Death jumpscare
Needs one of those Spongebob "One eternity later" cuts.
My man's broke the integer limit
THAT is what I wanna see in Balatro 😂
*does something crazy in a game*
face: does not change one millimeter, doesn't react, takes 10 seconds to even say something
Honnestly i don't get the same set as you, gg man
The cut at 7:22 Jesus Christ
Def could have gotten some value by upgrading flush five. Levelling n times is roughly an n times multiplier. Running the numbers, Bull is definitely better than another hack. Bull, in taking you from 200 to 20,000 is a 100x mult, whereas 5 more glass cards is just 32x.
Bro got that Lego Star Wars Stud multiplier extra cheats economy going
Can you maybe hover a bit longer over the Joker, i am not a veteran in Balatro and dont know all the specs of the jokers. That would be nice, thnx. Btw nice videos. Greetings from Germany :D
My headphones aren’t headponing
I had a run not as good but fun because it was low numbers was (uncommon mut card), Fib, Hack, Fib(invis ghost copy), Baseballcard. Not the most insane run ever but it's fun winning with like low numbers and 5's and having it trigger over and over again.
Why didn't the glass cards break?
I love this game
Easy way to fix this would make it so manually selling invisible joker doesn’t work
The money font size changed between closing out of the game and reopening
I think they fixed this duplicate glitch.
They have, I just tried it! 🤣
"Add Polychrome to a random Joker, destroy all other Jokers" is a weird way to write an effect. Because as you just did, you can just sell all the Jokers you don't want, and then you both get money instead of destroying Jokers *and* you get to choose which Joker you keep.
It still gets the intended effect of you losing all your jokers just to get polychrome on a joker. I agree with you that they should just have let you select which joker you wanted to save tho.
as I was typing this, I realised that selling all the other jokers would still be the better play since you get money for it. I have no idea why they did what they did.
That just means there's an optimal way to play the card. Nothing wrong with that.
I’d write, “If you have 1 joker, give it polychrome” or something to that effect
@@SolarPoweredAlien i don't think theres any other effects that have you select a joker, thats probably why
i was thinking it would make more sense for it to just say "sell all other jokers" so you don't have to do it yourself, but also that would cause issues with things like invisible joker (and maybe other sell triggers) so honestly just destroying is probably the simplest
Why put the seal/glass on the 2? Why not on a high value hack card?
the blue value they provide barely matters considering bull is a thing, all 2s is 80 blue with this deck, all 5s is 200
an extra dozen or so points doesn't matter when the bull's giving 10 thousand lol
i wanna try that seed with an auto clicker. leave it over night and see how high it goes
I'M SO GLAD IM NOT THE ONLY ONE!!!!!!! 20:05
chat was just saying random numbers lol
Did you find the seed and then min-max it for a high-score? The seed at the end is highlighted in red
Yes he literally says that at the start
Can someone explain why selling the invisible one copies it? Roughly at 7:00 ?
Ok, got it. I thought invisible copies a random jokers ability. But it copies a random joker upon sell.
what is the seed code
Is the glitch already out of the game ? Or can i still duing this ??
20 thousand x 7 billion is a big number
Failing to sell that card before playing the final hand only cost him 90 billion points. NBD
and i thought i was good for doing 125k in one hand XD
You skipped the MVP of the run, the Macro Joker. 😢
Doubles money?? 20 dollars??? Lmfao
The fact that he didn't even move bull, ffs
it doesn't matter where it is, so long it's not in the first position, that would mess up the combo a little
it would double the chips, but at the cost of not triggering the glass cards again, which would be 2^5 multiplier missed to the bull's 2 if moved in the first position.
@@mihaiioc.3809 fair enough
You won so hard the game thought it was the demo?
Seed?
Does anyone know the name of the song that plays during the intro?
Best Hand "0" YEP
No endless?
Surely Bull should have been 2nd? So the 2x from the glass starts multiplying the mult from a much higher number?
Bull adds chips not mult
@@anitagofradump5195 oh yeah my bad
if you look closely at the order the hacks triggered in, they don't activate when the joker row triggers, they activate when the *card* triggers, meaning a "adds x mult" joker would activate after all the cards had triggered no matter where it was (but an "adds x mult when y card is played" joker would be different, since it triggers when the cards do)
Oh this demo can't do now
scouted randomly on the video just cuz i knew this was a noobie playing and effectively thats the case 20:00
just watched the first 5 seconds, wtf is the 5? ante limit? i saw at the end of the video its the demo version wth is this video?
Why 2s and not 5s
Yooo the intro have returned!!! T^T
bro youre playing at light speed. the game aint even out yet
wait so this wasnt played legit? he was using some sort of program? or what
Wouldn’t the hack make each 2 hit fib?
yeah, still not better than another hack
Somebody give me this seed
Correct me if I'm wrong but wouldn't he have been way better off putting the bull in the left most position so its effect was copied, essentially doubling his chips?
His mult was already in the hundreds of millions so why bother copying the effect of the hack card when you could get so much more value from raising the total chips?
"x2 mult" is basically the same as multiplying the whole thing by two, since multiplication is commutative [i.e. (2x(1000x5) is the same as (2x1000)x5]
a second bull would multiply the end result by two once (by doubling the chips), a second hack multiplies the end result by two _five times_ (by doubling the mult once for each glass 2)
@@eden3669 Ah okay that makes sense.
infinite money glitch
So next goal is 1 sextillion dollars?
outro song name?
152 Trillion, or 152,000,000,000,000
e14 = 14 numbers after the period.
Can anybody explain the money glitch in this video as if I am the dumbest human being to ever exist
He had, at the outset, miscellaneous jokers plus one that, on arrival at a specified condition, copies a random joker on sale. The apparent "intended use" of this joker is to, likely early in a run, copy a valuable joker to compound the effect; however, consummated prerequisites are copied in addition to the other attributes of the card. At the bottom of the screen was a tarot card which duplicates a random joker alongside and satisfied conditions. If only a single joker exists, the random effect necessarily targets it as no other option exists. Selling all the aforementioned miscellaneous jokers left the player with only that which duplicates as its exclusive function. The tarot card is, then, played necessarily, as the player owns only the single joker, duplicating the card whose only function is to duplicate on sale another joker. This leaves the player with exactly two identical jokers with the following property: when this card is sold (bearing in mind that a sale actually provides the player with funds), duplicate a random (bearing in mind that the only other joker itself duplicates when sold) joker. When the first joker is sold, two events occur: the player accrues funds, then the other joker (which also duplicates on sale) is duplicated. This provides the player with the funds and an additional joker that can be sold for funds and a copy that serves it's own function.
This works because there are exactly two copies of the duplicating joker. If any card apart from the duplicating joker exists, the chance exists that it, rather than the duplicating joker, will be copied leaving the player with two identical non-duplicating jokers and a single duplicating joker on whose sale, now, a third copy of the non -duplicating joker will be provided. If, on the other hand, the player only has a single duplicating joker, the sale will catalyze the duplication effect with no other card to duplicate providing the player with only the sale price.
Looking at it slightly more abstractly, what you will see is that the balance of a sale mechanism in a game is the severance of ownership (principally alienability and use) is compensated by the provision of funds as in a real-world market. In the typical case, the player loses ownership interest in a mundane object, such as a multiplicative modifier in the case in this game, in exchange for the funds; however, in this situation, the player is provided two sorts of funds in exchange for alienation: the money as well as a card of equal value indistinguishable from the card sold. The player can now sell the replacement object just as it had the first.
Overly hype CCs. I sleep. Overly casual CCs. I sleep harder.
Subbed bc of this video
Can't replicate this with the seed K37AVPG1, have they changed it somehow?
You should probably add a skip intro timestamp for people who want to see it unfold blind since your intro spoils the entire video.
best hand 0 nois
goat
Its good that bugs like this are being found in the demo
not a bug, it's probably unintended but it ain't a bug
What bug
@@virtualmartini not really a bug, but a design flaw. Invisible joker gets duplicated with their round values, making it possible to sell infinitely.
O_o Hafu rn…
Win the demo 🤔. Pony detected 😭😭😭😭
lol
I like the video
Great video. But facecams suck - they obscure the game especially if 80% of facecam is just a room.
I wish i had autism and could understand all this 😢
"Guys I won the game on the easiest difficulty!"
Nobody cares.
Р
Second!
Bit late man