String Theory in Nutshell
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 มี.ค. 2023
- String theory is one of the most fascinating theoretical frameworks in physics. It is an idea that proposes that physical reality is made up of tiny vibrating strings instead of subatomic particles. These strings behave like the basic units of matter, with their vibrations determining the properties of particles. One of the striking features of this theory is that it requires extra dimensions beyond our familiar four dimensions of space and time. Some forms of the theory propose that as many as 26 dimensions of spacetime exist.
However, these extra dimensions are believed to curl up and remain undetectable. String theory unites particle physics with gravity; hence, it's a candidate for the unified theory or the theory of everything. However, the proposed strings are so tiny that it's almost impossible to experiment with them and test the theory's validity. Hence, currently, there's no evidence in its favor. - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
Key point: no evidence.
@@olutukko2681 There's also no evidence disproving the theory that subatomic particles are made of fairy dust. If a claim is scientific, the burden of proof is always, always, always on the people making a positive claim. Otherwise, If they can't prove their claim, it's pseudoscience or religion.
Also, string theory made predictions about extra dimensions and supersymmetry, among other things, that supporters expected to find evidence for by now with the large hadron collider, the results from the collider have not shown what string theorists expected to find by now. Still, not proof strings aren't real, but again, when something isn't real, you're not going to find a way to disprove it. It's up to the string theorists to demonstrate that what they claim is correct, and not only haven't they, but they've also made predictions that didn't happen. For most scientists who are intellectually honest, that should stop you from believing a hypothesis until/unless actual supporting data is found.
@@olutukko2681 that's why it's still in picture and not in a trashcan
Yk Einstein’s theory of relativity is the same way. Darwin’s theory of evolution. Just bc it’s a theory doesn’t mean it’s instantly wrong and string theory makes just as much sense as both of those
@@youtubersdigest both of those theories you just mentioned have experimental evidence that they are correct. String theory does not.
@@zachary7309 string almost theory
No. It does not say the universe is made of strings INSTEAD of subatomic particles; the idea is that subatomic particles are made of tiny strings on the Planck length scale.
THANK YOU. Gosh, i got so mad when he said that
You just contradicted your self, what isn't made of subatomic particles?
@@terrylloyd9824 in this theory, subatomic particles
@@Empr.Palpatine sence you got so mad at the comment you should be able to tell me what isn't made of subatomic particles?
@@terrylloyd9824your mom
i must be proof of string theory because i like to curl up and remain undetectable
😂😂😂😂
Now that is something worth honestly considering! 🍷😎👍
Someone call The Science people…
WE HAVE THE PROOF
Hahaha
@@varunemanilol
The problem with the string theory is that it is unproven. It has remained stagnant for at least four decades. Not likely to be proved experimentally.
I mean it sound good but who is making up all these crazy theories anyway when we don’t even have proof of other dimensions yet it’s all theories still (unproven) so where did all these extra dimensions come from now who thought of 18 more dimensions this shit getting silly prove before making extra theories on it otherwise it sounds as ridiculous as saying It’s possible you can fly if you jump off a building but it’s still unproven experimentally would you believe/try? Js
it would be soon. .when einstein's E=mc² was published the great rutherford brushed it aside with a killer phrase that the energy within the atom is mere moonshine. .he was "slapped" when an A-bomb flattened hiroshima and nagasaki. . . .when barbra mclintock published(1952) the results of her "jumping genes" research not everybody was convinced in the plant genetics community until 30 thirty years later(1982) she was awarded with a nobel prize. . .string theory is not dead yet even after decades of futile research. .it's still remain a theory subject to be proven. .some crazy scientists are hell bent on tracking it down. . it took more or less 1,300 years before ptolemy's epicentricism(2A.D.) was replaced by heliocentricism. . . .never underestimate the restlessness of scientific minds. .
String theory is no longer accepted in academia.
The bigger problem is not how to proof it mathematically, but that it has no conditions for falseability, not a single field test possible for it by now, resembling more the garage dragons of Sagan, than a physical theory
90% of scientific theories aren't proven. Even the ones that we thought were are disproved 50-60 years later
It's even driving Sheldon crazy.
Sheldon has like mid intelligence though... he just talks weird.
@@StellarFacts12 Sheldon: Shows only average intelligence for a nerd of his age
"But his IQ is blah blah"
He just needs Penny’s help.
@@crappyanimations9992 true, he got distracted and not by his wife but comic books, and fictional tv shows and video games and paint ball. He lost his intelligence.
@@lawyerpanda1856 rip
For those who still might have trouble understanding: let me explain it in simple terms.
We all know and have been taught since childhood that atoms make up everything. But, what are atoms made up of? Electrons, protons and neutrons. Electrons are basically energy. (Won’t go in detail) and protons and neutrons are made up of even smaller particles called quarks. But when we try to see them, we are not able to. To see anything, we need light. Which is basically a wave. In such small particles, the wave simply passes through them. Now, why can’t we see them by increasing the waves? That will simply push the particles aside. So, to understand it properly, we replace these particles with something more complex. A string. These strings vibrate and different vibrations tells us about the different particles it makes up. This is not proved as the strings are again, hard to see. However this is really fascinating as it can tell us so much about gravity,etc and our universe. The mathematical questions in string theory say that there are 10-11 dimensions or more.String theory cannot be proven in our dimension. It is much more complicated than this, though. Hope this helps:)
Bro is smort
thx u
But somehow, this brings me to the Aristotle infinite divisibility theory.🤔💭
Eyy thank you
For the 10-11 dimensions, I believe superstring theory shows you that, and for regular string theory it’s 26 dimensions. Also with superstring theory it gives way to super symmetry (both fermion and boson particles should have the same amount in each side of the quark table).
I sure am glad you explained this....lol. I still don't get it!!!😂
it's not designed ifor anyone to get it. the idea is to make you give up and believe THEY are smarter than you so whatever they say, it has got to be the truth and you're too primitive to understand it. then we have delusional nerdy people with pocket protectors who walk on their toes, play dungeons and dragons and have permanent grind on their faces because they think they know reality because they've read it in a physics book, and they're the ones that get hired to teach this garbage in universities and get paid lots of money, then when NASA fakes another mission, Mr. Nerdy dude with a PhD in bullshit would describe how NASA landed on Mars and we all clap and think it must be true because Mr Nerdy dude said so, do it must be true, and that's how they get away with stealing billions and billions and billions of our money 💰💵🤑💰💵🤑💰💵🤑
Call it fake news😂
it's just another example of "smart" people appealing to their "smart" authorities, specifically Dr. Witten's m theory here.
It's using maths that fits what we know, to explain things we don't know. That's why there's a set number of dimensions in the theory, because that's what works mathematically. Trouble is there are endless ways to manipulate numbers to make it match what we already know, and string theory just keeps getting adjusted every time we find something new, a god of the gaps kind of theory.
@@protercool8474 Every time Micheo (sp?) comes on tv to act as a celebrity scientist and pretend he knows about whatever field they're talking about in the video, I can't help but remember that his entire career is based off of one debunked hypothesis, and I wonder, why the f*ck did they hire him to explain celebrity psychology or the science behind an*l lube?
The coolest part about this theory is that if they exist, we could bend them in such ways that we could travel between space and time. A homemade wormhole.
"bUt wHaT aRE tHE STRIngS MAde Out oF?"
mOre STrinGs
@@gurusharanak9400 What are the more strings made of?
@@lNGSOC eVen MoRE sTriNgS
Nothingness
Plot twist god made all the strings with his hair 😊
Try reading The Elegant Universe by the world’s leading proponent of this theory, Brian Greene.
I read The Elegant Universe thoroughly and repeatedly and thought about it a lot. I concluded that string theory was wrong.
I kept thinking, and I developed an alternative hypothesis that looks good so far. So thanks, Brian Greene.
In short, space has little bits of trapped energy in its hidden dimensional fields, and they vibrate. Which field they vibrate in determines what they are.
Not sure about super string theory but the concept of the properties of matter ultimately being linked to forms of energy makes logical sense given the fact is already proven that quasars from black holes produce forms of matter from energy, and black holes in essence convert matter back into energy….. at a fundamental level it would make sense that there could be some underlying framework of the properties of matter which are energy-based that can be malleable to a degree
@@mitchellminer9597So you "invented" the Higgs Field?
Michio kaku is out of control 😂
What did he say now? Usually I get recommendations for this kind of stuff.
@@davidforget6906 he's quoting one of those empty Rogan guests that have less knowledge than drugs in their brains
He keeps saying strange stupid things. Looks like a joker to me
That man has no idea what he’s saying anymore, just spews buzz words
He has become a scientific Wack Job in his old age !
now I know how my kids dixi cup phones work
That string theory is actually provable😂
And as a kid it is also how I used to "fly" a June bug.
@@gezellig1634 as the Eloi would say All Clear
Edward Witten is considered to be the most intelligent man on earth, by far. When he was asked about the size of a string, he said that a string compared to an atom it like an atom compared to the universe.
Quantum physicists never claimed there are 26 dimensions. One group calculates with 10 dimensions, another group with 11 dimensions. This 26 dimensions is made up by you.
Every string in universe is interlocked with other strings. They are literally everywhere, also in the vacuum of universe.Informationt is passed on in realtime about the spin of tiny particles which is by default counterclockwise. Quantum physics has no T (time) nor space. Everything is happening at the same moment, past, present, future, in other dimensions. When there's no T, there's no past nor future.
I have never heard anyone say Edward Witten is the smartest man on earth. Smart sure but smartest? I think not.
@@Mugen503 Maybe you are the smartest and he is only #2, right?
@@DonJohnSpain projecting much? Not once in that statement did I say I was smarter than him. Do people fall for dumb shit like that for you all the time or is this a recent endeavor?
Prove to me the existence of a 4th dimension then we can talk and no dimensions 4 and 5 are not space and time thats utter bullshit. 3d is the farthest it goes since thats what makes up our life the world is 3d anything more and you might as well tell me that magic is the 6th dimension
@@Mugen503id say he defo is a canidate
Even the ancients had some idea ...
'There is geometry in the humming of a string.
There is music in the spacing of the spheres.'
- Pythagoras, ~5th Cen. BC
Music of the spheres!!!
@Leo ancient people were more advanced than today's people.
Yeah, Ancient Greece was advanced all right. Right about then (500 )BC the Temple on Mt. Olympus was being RE-built. So much lost to history, even intentionally.
@東京都 Yes, that's true.
@Leo Hi, Leo. Yes there was, advanced for the time. Even Giza pyramids would have been impossible without science and technology. We didn't think of it first.
My goodness. As Arthur C. Clarke said some time ago, the universe is not only stranger than you imagine, it is stranger than you CAN imagine.
Yet it is made entirely out of or in imagination. 👍
The G string theory always gets me excited... 😋
🤣🤣🤣
lol bruh
So cheeky. Butt true.
The reason there's no evidence supporting string theory is because we have an incomplete understanding to unify all the physics underlying the five different forms of string theory.
The shortest and most easiest explanation I've ever heard about this.
Nope..I cut it in half. Put it in the trashcan and move on bro. Seriously,these people aren't helping anybody
see the cosmological constant produced by string theory. It's negative because is that of an antidesitter universe, the opposed of our.
Anything called a theory should never be confused as fact.
The theory of SHELDON ON THE BIG BANG THEORY
The video: "...theory of everything..."
My brain ASAP: *Geometry Dash*
I'll have you know, it's true. I now have the power of 'Strand'.
*G O G E T T H E R A D I A L M A S T*
The higher science won’t be seen in a microscope. It is found in higher consciousness.
The "strings" cannot be experimented on yet because they dont exist in a timely manner.
The theory goes like this:
You have a single point of space (a pixel)
A point has zero dimensions therefore it's existence cannot be proven or disproven as it doesnt essencially exist nor be interacted with because it has no properties other than existing.
However If you vibrate that point up and down (up and down being relative to the viewer in this example) along an axis you have now 1 dimension (a line) whose existence CAN be proven as it now has a property.
A 2nd and a 3rd dimensions can be obtained by making said point vibrate back and forth and left to right instead of just up and down.
For that point to go from one place to the other it took time and that's your 4th dimension being now a string (imagine a small point going around an axis moving in space and leaving a trail)
a 5th and a 6th dimensions can be obtained from moving away or close enough until the same properties can be observed to work again (ie. Universes working on the same laws as pixels or pixels under the same as universes) and in between there can be others if you consider the macro molecular level as working differently than the quantum level, the planetary level as working differently than those 2, the galactic level were Black holes exist...
This theory is unlikely to stop being one because for dimensions to exist as separate would have to be proven as incompatible with the others and that cannot be done until you prove theres one point by which laws start repeating themselves (which so far hasnt been the case) , we also cant prove the existence of the pixel so even if this ends up proven true a billion years from now it's irrelevant right now and the quantum foam theory seems to be much more predictable as a working basis.
E=mc² was a theory until it was tested.. when they figure out how to generate gravitational waves they'll crack it
Emm…
E=mC2 is still a theory...do you know what the C represents..? the Constant; do you know what the Constant is that they use..? the speed of light...that's the problem; the speed of light is not Constant...
@@ShawnCheriYoung yea........
E = mc² is still a theory, bc in science the word "theory" is used differently to mean "determined fact". It's called the "Gravitational Theory" for a reason. There's also "Cell Theory", "Germ Theory", "Theory of Evolution", "Heliocentric Theory", "Atomic Theory", "Kinetic Theory of Gases", "Theory of Plate Tectonics", etc. - all evidence-based facts. String Theory is a misnomer, bc technically it's still a hypothesis.
I LOVE winding people up!!!!!!!
ive literally struggled so hard to understand string theory so thank you for this
This theory is basically scientists saying "source: trust me bro".
My money's on M-theory
There's always problem with the math. The complex numbers in reality aren't twodimensional only they seem to be. We need the "complete numbers" instead of them. They are threedimensionals.
Let's connect with Dr. Sheldon Cooper for finding evidence in its favor 😅
But he gave it up for not getting anywhere with it!
It feels like physics having an existential crisis
"theyre so tiny that no evidence can be found" thats except we find cosmic strings which were looking for
In a nutshell. Emphasis on nut.
Only thing I know is we truly don’t know anything.
Yup, the more information we discover the more we realise how little we actually understand about our universe.
@@himynameis3664isn’t it fascinating how far we came tho, i mean we’re just humans living in a expanding universe
It’s an idea that doesn’t seem to be going anywhere for decades.
Just because there is no evidence doesn't mean I can't experience it. These a fractal portholes.
There ya go. Fractal geometry is proven, and is the future of quantum theory. It will come together someday. It may morph, evolve, and may change terminology, but it's getting there.
😂😂😂😂
SCI-FI 🙄
Um, if you're "experiencing" it, then there's proof for whatever "it" is. The trouble is that probably don't know what you're measuring or experiencing, in which case, you may as well start a religion since religions share the the same standard for understand what is real as what you're expressing... It's not science.
@@martymodus7205 EXACTLY... ALL of this SCIENTIFIC "THEORY" CRAP takes even MORE "FAITH" than it does for ME to Believe in God ((FACT))💯
Damn, that literally sounds like religion
It's there and controlling everything, but you can't see or measure it. No evidence it does/doesn't exist, only vague hints that might suggest it in a certain light according to its own rules if you take it as a given... Or just the say-so of some people, who want you to pay them to tell you more about it. 🤔
The difference is string theorists are actively attempting to prove it’s correct
Wait. Didn’t Sheldon and Amy solve this yrs. Ago???
It’s sheets. Like a violin that needs an orchestra to sing the song of creation and keep the harmonies of the music of the spheres in equilibrium.
It wasn't Amy. It was Sheldon and Penny. It turns its sheets, not strings, lol!
@@granadosvm hurrah! I’ve only watched bits and pieces of the show.
@Alusnovalotus not really that's more of a hypothesis and can't be used to really be the answer unless an experiment is done
@@Darrenlinkon Sounds like science hit the same wall as religion.
reminds me of Jack Skelington and his trying to explain "Christmas spirit"
"It's like music in the air, invisible, yet everywhere"
@@Alusnovalotus string theory has astronomy just keeps ongoing
This is true and this has been written in Indian Hindu text thousands of years ago❤
Ah yes I forgot about their ancient super microscopes and fundamental understanding of the quantum realm which is why they attribute random gods to every little thing and believe in a caste system.
It can be simplified by realizing empty space is actually continuously solid and has harmonic properties.
Vibration is life
Good vibes
I thought it's what the sub atomic particles were made of.. like what the quarks and gluons were theoretically made of. Like if the quark was the size of the solar system.. the string would be the size of a tree.
Yeah, string theory definitely doesn't propose that strings are a replacement for subatomic particles, especially since we have empirical proof of the existence of said particles.
That just fuking broke my brain
I love these new theories . We can't see it , we can't test it but, we think it's there. It's like anytime they come up against a problem they can't solve with our current math , then they make up some new math and get more Government grants to study these things we can't see or touch. Sounds like a pretty good job to me.
Prime example of when bureaucracy and favoritism take precedence over the scientific method. It's only a theory because of that.
Only REAL Theory I care about is my 6-String Flying-V Stratocaster...now that's some powerful Acoustic Physics, no?
shreddin the universe with gnarly riffs bro
Why say no? The answer is yes 😊. I bought a cheaper Strat in the 90's, wish I still had it, or a better one of course. Rock on MadScientyst.
And you can see it, hold it, and play it. So therefore it is proven!😅.
Things that are never seen and can't be proved; sounds like government "benefits"
String Theory belongs on BigBang Soap.
Vibrations of matter with too small of strings. Extra dimensions possible 26. Gravity match. E=MC^2.
“or the theory of everything”
Me: GEOMETRY DAAAAAASH
I will forever think differently about the wiggly line in my peripheral vision now.
Now what are the strings made of.
Good point.
Nothing, I believe. I work with theoretical physics. And have made a few theories myself, such as Generator String theory, and spinfoam models
I have invented something yet to be invented 😂
By merely inverting the "expanding" universe model (without otherwise altering or refuting it), aka "Conspansion", aka "Reincarnation", String Theory can be saved from its lack of relevance. In a static universe model (entirely valid), objects and time scales virtually "collapse" (aka "rescaling"), forming nested and overlapping ambient images (eg, what you see), with each ambient image (per a 3d Venn diagram) essentially "resonating" with other such images, including its own past and future incarnations. Each ambient image is akin to a resonating "string", and the entire "conspansive matrix" forms the entire "history" of space/time itself, offering the only possible model of reality in the process.
String theory tantalizes us with the idea that the universe's fundamental building blocks are not particles, but vibrating strings, hinting at a deeper, multidimensional reality beyond our perception.
It's like the theory of the protons neutrons and electrons until they were proven
A simulation seems more viable than string theory
I propose, that the foundation of everything is simply, sound frequency. Vibrating strings are fueled by sound, which creates energy, which in turn, creates matter.
There's no sound in space, dude.
@@MucaroBoricua I disagree. Astronomers have recorded actual specific tones of sound frequency from the sun, each planet, even from deep space. Ever heard of 432hz? It's the primordial 🕉 om.
Well, that's a stoner idea if I've ever heard one. First, you're using "sound" incorrectly since sound is specifically longitudinal waves created by pressure differentials within a medium of particles. Gravity waves, for instance, are not sound, but we have translated things like the gravity waves created by colliding black holes into sound that humans can hear, but they are not "sound" any more than the waves on the ocean are (ocean waves can make sound, but they are silent until they hit something or crest).
More importantly, you are invoking "strings" which have no supporting evidence in the first place, but then you're complicating things further by suggesting that these things, that have never been demonstrated to exist, are "fueled" by sound. So, where did the sound come from and what is it? In what way does sound "fuel" these mysterious strings? These are questions you will never have answers for because there's no good reason whatsoever to suggest what you suggested unless you're either stoned or on the left peak of the Dunning-Kruger curve for this topic.
@@martymodus7205 I don't understand. can you explain me in simple words please.
if all possibilities are possible, then there is one universe where none of the other universes are possible, so that means that there are no other universes.
String theory is physicists thinking they have to come up with something new that will define their era.
I propose that everything is connected in some fractional way similar to the way that we create and store memories in our brain.
Even if it's not our reality, the fact that the math checks out might allow us to create our own simulated universe using string theory.
Time is bot a dimension. The dimensions are spatial, meaning that time is its own thing and cannot be the fourth dimension.
Time is a dimension it’s just not a spatial dimension. Spatial and temporal dimensions aren’t exactly the same
No evidence? How come Sheldon (tbbt) won a Nobel prize
That string cant seen but can be heard as it vibrating in our body and making limitless sound which is On 24hrs if u can listen 24 hours ..
In other words, there is 0 evidence yet we are staking it as the claim for the theory of everything. Well done sciences
Sting theory is nothing more than the misunderstanding of how Photons interact with Electrons through Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Superposition.
There is so far nothing Theory-like about String Theory. It’s simply an unfalsifiable exercise in mathematical reverie - not exactly a scientific endeavor.
wait... i thought there were 33 dimensions within 333 hyper-vibrational layers inside 666 multi-dimensional bubbles of spacetime? 🧐
"The theory that an infinite number of universes, or bubbles co-exist and intersect at an infinite number of points... bubble universes intersecting in the 10th dimension could fragment a blackhole." - starhunter (tv show)
what.
Every particle thing has its own value just we need eyes to see them
The problem is it can neither be proved nor disproved so....
Its not “instead of” subatomic particles. Its that tiny strings make up everything, including subatomic particles
String theory has become very popular in pop culture because it suggests extra dimensions and the possibility of a multiverse however in actual physics and within actual scientific communities (which shouldn't be confused with the science fiction community), scientists have lost favor and interest in string theory for the past decades because of multiple reasons. The fact that it requires more dimensions than the ones we experience in our reality is actually a bad thing because that suggests that the theory is likely wrong since it's not able to describe what we experience as reality. Another thing is the issue with the cosmological constant. If string theory was correct, then we should have a negative cosmological constant however we detected that the cosmological constant of our universe is positive. So if string theory was correct, it doesn't makes sense why we only see four dimensions(3 spatial dimensions plus 1 time dimension) and why the cosmological constant is positive when it should be negative.
The big problem is all other alternatives also have big problems with describing our universe. It could be of course that we just haven’t found the correct theory yet but we can only wait and see
And the theory has been falling flat on it's string.
String theory absolutely screws me into the floorboards. I don't understand it at all.
Basically we wigglin n shit
Universe is that mystery which is far away from thinking of human brain
A theory lacking evidence classifies itself as a wild guess
"hypothesis" is the correct word.
Saw as a teenager ,1972 something like strings everywhere on everything, except air. during two different semi bad trips on a synthetic drug called Marazine.When touched these sticky very fine threads would stick to you and multiply.~~~~~true story.
I like to think about it as a string model of the universe rather than string theory till we validate the hypothesis
Experience tells us that, as we dig deeper for the nature of truth, the answers we find may seem unfamiliar, but overall an underlying simplicity emerges. String theory seems extremely unlikely because it reveals an underlying increase in complexity the deeper we go. Any theory which requires 11 or 26 dimensions to make predictions has to be an artificial construct.
Just look back to the "celestial spheres" explanation of orbital mechanics for an earlier example.
This is serious concern and no body is caring of it
When I invented string theory I had no idea stupid humans would take it this far...lol.
Great great great book Fabric of the Cosmos by Dr. Green. Really does a , great, job of elucidating this concept. String theory, close(st) theory for unification.
Got a noble prize in "big bang theory" 📺 show.
Crumbles of information leading to wider topics are everywhere, but do we need to know and understand everything about the universe at all?
String theory. It’s time to put this theory on the back burner and look at other alternatives
Other alternatives have their own problems
This sounds like Strand from Destiny 2
❤ Thank you very much sir
"Physical reality is made up of tiny vibrating strings ..." Consider 6 hypotheses: (1) String theory (in some form) is the only mathematically plausible way to unify quantum field theory & general relativity theory. (2) Professor Milgrom of the Weizmann Institute should have won a Nobel Prize 20 years ago. (3) The main problem with string theory is that the string theorists fail to realize that Milgrom is the Kepler of contemporary cosmology. (4) Einsteinian causality is basically string theory with the finite nature hypothesis. (5) String theory with the infinite nature hypothesis implies SUSY, the Friedmann model, & no MOND. (6) String theory with Fredkin's finite nature hypothesis implies MOND, the Riofrio-Sanejouand model, & no SUSY. Am I wrong about string theory & MOND? Please google "pavel kroupa dark matter".
Let's start with the fact there are no particles at all. We assume for mathematical simplification their shape is round while in fact protons, electrons and so on are build from quarks...
It is written, " By HIM all things consist ". "Consist " in the original Greek means " held together ".
Not him using justice league crisis on 2 earths clips
A lot of people say there’s no evidence, but if you go on TH-cam and type vibration sand, I feel like that is an example of string theory. Another one would be vibration/sound experiment with water or something like that. I feel like these are examples of string theory.
Yes
but the mass of the atoms would then collapse in on itself causing a whole in space time known specifically for its love for chicken with the only way to disperse this is by adding additional spin to it and consistently switching out negative and neutral charges across space time so that a new dimensional of semi-existing space forms without distrusting the already wobbly Format of space by dispersing the energy through the medium of quantum strings that send energy through each other when taking in to much through quantum tunneling leading to a particle that flickers in and out of existence creating and equilibrium by allowing them to function as waves and particles and there by effecting how they function through how much stress is being put onto them at the Planck scale which then creates the force known as gravity. But that’s just a theory a game theory!
It's the plank length
Counter point: String Theory is one of the most preposterous and farcical theories ever proposed.
Professor: So, string theory states that the strings are infinitesimally small, yet they require multiple other dimensions to exist.
Doubting Student: Then how do we know they’re out there, that they exist-why can’t we see them?
Professor: Because the extra dimensions curl up on themselves in order to remain undetectable.
Doubting Student: Kinda like your brain, right?
Professor: Get out of my class.
Doubting Student: No problem, Mr. Science Guy.
Nah religion is.
This stupid scenario^ is so outdated and worn out. It was often used as a "strong" argument that theists held unto whenever they wanted to illustrate that just bc God can't be seen, it doesn't mean he isn't real. But the idiots never wanted to acknowledge that we've already observed/determined that the human brain exists and that it's impossible to be alive without one. Yet, here we are still being force-fed this scenario, which desperately wants to give the impression of "outsmarting" scientists. I saw where it was going as soon as I saw it was a dialog between professor and student. And I felt a huge amount of cringe by the end 😬
@@YourMajesty143 Stupid and outdated like your childish temper tantrum about the existence of God?
Firstly, where in my comment did I even mention religion or God? Secondly, your smug, self-righteous, and less-than-astounding confirmation about the existence of the human brain was mildly entertaining at best. Personally, I read Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley's "Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus" when I was in 2nd grade, so I'm quite comfortable with the subject matter of the human brain, thank you. Lastly, no one is trying to outsmart anyone here---I merely expressed my opinion and added a humorous anecdote just for fun. But, no. You had to be a Debbie Downer, didn't you?
What's really on display here is your immaturity and inability to cope with an opposing opinion, so you attack the source. This is quite typical of weak and spineless people, those who lack convictions, decency, humanity, or integrity. They think only of themselves, and only care about what's right for them, everyone else be damned. You want cringe? Take a good, long look in the mirror.
"Except for String Theory, nothing new has happened in the world of physics since the 1930s. And you can't prove String Theory. The most you can say is, 'My idea has an internal logical consistency! Yaaaay!'"
- Leonard Hofstater, The Big Bang Theory
Them having no evidence of this theory and then saying: „Yeah well that‘s just because everything is too small to verify.“ Bruh.
Its like a woman saying:“I have a dick, trust me bro it‘s just too small for you to see.“
Strings huh, like our bodies nerves and how they work.
Not to be confused with the String Theory Sam Beckett talks about on the original Quantum Leap. That was absolutely wrong and confused a lot of people about what String Theory actually is.
why would it be strings when things seem to be balls and/or spirals of varying size.
Because... 😉
It's all connected via partials!