Forward Kinematics of Industrial Robot | Part 1| Robotics 201

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 12

  • @EngineeringSimplified
    @EngineeringSimplified  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ✍Any Questions, doubts, or thoughts? Comment below (I read & respond to every comment).
    👉Don't forget to SUBSCRIBE to the channel for more such videos & courses: bit.ly/Engineering-Simplified

  • @moatazseghyar8554
    @moatazseghyar8554 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Keep up the good stuff brother this is really good

    • @EngineeringSimplified
      @EngineeringSimplified  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you so much, Moataz! As long as people find my content useful, I will continue making these videos :)

  • @shruthipk2031
    @shruthipk2031 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    how did you get the detailed matrix in 07:35 ?

    • @EngineeringSimplified
      @EngineeringSimplified  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      These are the rotation matrices of the robot about Z and Y axis. You might want to watch this video first in which I explain these rotation matrices and how they are derived: th-cam.com/video/ZNcdYDGP-PA/w-d-xo.html

  • @malladinagasubhash
    @malladinagasubhash ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a doubt regarding the First and third joint. Aren't they twisting joints ?. Can you please explain why did you call them as revolute joints.

    • @EngineeringSimplified
      @EngineeringSimplified  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes you are right. They are also called twist joints. Usually you can call the same joints a number of names which depends on which direction you are looking at them from. If you are looking at this joint along the direction of the link, then it seems to twist. If you are looking from the side, it seems to 'revolve' around an axis.
      In the books and literature, you can find it referred to with a bunch of different names with the most common being an 'R' or revolute joint.
      Hope that clarifies the confusion.

    • @malladinagasubhash
      @malladinagasubhash ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@EngineeringSimplified Thank you

    • @EngineeringSimplified
      @EngineeringSimplified  ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad to have helped!

  • @zeeshankhan2639
    @zeeshankhan2639 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

  • @fouadfouad-kg6kl
    @fouadfouad-kg6kl ปีที่แล้ว

    the frams are not well done rereed the DH convention

    • @EngineeringSimplified
      @EngineeringSimplified  ปีที่แล้ว

      The frames can be easily represented from this representation to the DH convention. They both are representing the same information. I just like this convention to be more intuitive.