@@drlisp123 he does, but a lot of his opinions are decades out of date. He is right about how terrible most of the German car brands have become though.
The 3.6 V6 is a very good engine if you change the oil every 3,000 miles. My dad has a customer with a Traverse with the 3.6 with 250,000 miles. CHANGE YOUR OIL FOLKS
Over a period of 12 years, I owned two Cadillacs - both a 2000 DHS and a 2006 DTS. Both were used when I got them. They had 4.6L Northstar engines and never had an ounce of trouble with either of them. Big, solid, quiet and incredibly smooth.
I got a 2013 Cadillac ATS with a 2.0 Turbo. Based off the Camaro platform...Things fast, fun, and still gets 30 mpg all day long. Oh and its a 6 speed manual.
@@brianmcreynolds2431 the only real issue reliability wise has been the rear diff seals. They have been replaced twice within the last 80k. And my buddy who has a 2017 version of the almost identical car has the same issues, so it's not just me. But besides that, just oil changes and gas
@@nathangebben5738 yup I got a 13’ ATS 2.5 base and replace the rear differential about 4 years ago, recently changed the differential fluid. Other than that it’s been quite reliable besides oil changes, and I’m due for brakes soon . Had it for 7 years already got it at 40k miles and I’m at about 85k now, but thinking of trading in in the next year or 2 for either a Lexus es350, Lexus gs, Mazda 6, or even a ct6
I daily drove one for years, ended up selling it to my girlfriend because of my back issues. Still love driving it occasionally. Y coolant pipe, VVT solenoids, coil packs and a wheel bearing. Currently at 137k miles on a 2.0T AWD.
I view the GM 3.6L the same way as I do the Northstar, certain specific motors and specific years are problematic so people jump to say they’re all bad. As I understand the majority of the issues that plagued the 3.6 were fixed with the LFX which came out for 2012 and was used in Impala, Lacrosse, Camaro, etc. furthermore using a good oil and doing maintenance regularly helps a lot. I have a 2004 CTS 3.6L (purchased new) with 212K miles and have never had an issue with timing chains or any problems related to the motor’s construction or design. I have always done regular maintenance on it and use the recommended Mobil 1. I also had a 14 Camaro with the 3.6L for a period of time and it also had no problems during my ownership. I’m not saying they’re problem free or the best motors ever made but I do believe with the right motor and keeping on top of maintenance you can get some longevity out of it. Just my own thoughts and personal experience. I also work in the automotive repair industry and from what I’ve seen motors that tend be problematic haven’t been maintained very well, prolonged oil changes using either an oil that doesn’t meet Dexos 1 standards or one that only barely meets the requirements and going 8K-10K miles on an oil change. They start to consume oil and are constantly being ran low on oil and thus problems start to arise. I always try to push for the full synthetics and stress to them to not wait for the OLM to tell them it’s time to change oil and I have to say I have a few customers that have higher mileage cars with these motors that have been pretty happy with them. Again just my own experience with these motors, not looking to argue or fight with anyone on this. There are most certainly certain years and specific 3.6 motors you shouldn’t touch with a 50 foot pole, but I truly don’t believe the newer ones are all THAT bad. I’m actually looking at replacing my other Cadillac with an 18 or 19 Impala or Lacrosse which is going to have a 3.6L, it’ll be my third.
I've had multiple 3.6L GM motors, as well as family members who have had them. People have problems with them because most people don't do regular maintenance. I've never had major problems with any of mine. The only thing I've had to do is plugs and coil packs.
I am a big GM fan and imho the 3.6L is the best daily driver engine. Really powerful and amazing on fuel for a V6. We had a 3.6L (loved it) and 3.0 (not an impressive engine) But ofcourse nothing beats the smoothness of a V8.
I had a 2012 SRX with a 3.6 engine. Got it at 99k miles, sold it at 146k miles. GREAT ENGINE ! Engine flush when I bought it and full synthetic oil changes every 7-8k miles. Only repair I had to make was the accelerator position sensor for a whopping $58 .
First gen cts never had a 4 cylinder option, it was all v6 except for the cts-v. 2.8L and 3.6L high feature family, and 3.2 54 degree opel v6 for 2004 only.
A lot of the engines had pcv valve issues. That was the main reason for head gaskets blowing on the 1st gen DTS engines and even on some 2nd gen if you got it before 09. They sell aftermarket ones with the right opening width tho to help with that back pressure
@@MichaelJarvisEXTRAORDINAIRECould you show me where you had to drill ? I have a 2016 SRX with 60K and all the oil change records/maintenance etc. I need it to last as good as it is now.
@@steveschu there are some videos on you tube. That's how I found out. GM even put out a technical service bulletin. Basically your pcv has 3 holes. Just make the holes bigger then clean it out with carb cleaner.
I've test drive the CT6 at a car show couple years back and I will say the auto is not just only beautiful, but the ride and the aero dynamic of the car is superb.
Would love to see a video outlining why the GM 3.6L is so poor like you did with the Northstar and the Ford, great to see your breakdown of the design flaws from a mechanic’s standpoint!
Well, I know your post is about a year old but with the 3.6 L they had timing chain issues due to stretching over time. But a way to prolong this is to frequently change the oil @3000 miles. We love our 06 CTS and it's very zippy!
@@starlightandeverythingnice1650 These vehicles have Chains and not belts and they're not deemed a wear item, keep fresh oil and use a quality synthetic. I personally bring my own oil to the dealership even though I work at one! I've been using Mobil1 in my CTS and now I'm testing the waters with Amsoil in another vehicle and Liqui moly. By 2011 the timing chain issue wasn't really as big as an issue compared to older models.
it really was a snatching defeat from the jaws of victory moment for GM with the northstar. If they wanted to imitate the Germans; who also often love to riddle spectacular engineering with equally spectacular fail points; bravo.
They did. In 2005+ Northstar motors they used LS head bolts. I haven't heard a single case of a 2005+ motor blowing a head gasket, even on the Supercharged STS-V.
Why o why does GM always do something 80% awesome like Northstar and then “GM” the last 20%. Let’s use these head bolts from the parts bin and save few cents per bolt ... “GM’d” the whole engine. Fixed years (decade ....) later but too late. GM you are so frustrating- keep the bean counters out of the engineering dept and build quality like you are capable of from the start !!! Mary, are you getting this ??
It really is a shame as if it wasn't for the head issues the North Star engine would of been class leading for its time, also today there would be even more choice in the old luxury market for us cheapskates.
My daughter bought a 2004 Cadillac SRX 3.6 for $650. The timing chain had jumped (TSB) on the interference motor. I swapped in a Fraser Engines Bullet-Proof crate motor, with a 5 year unlimited mileage warranty. Thus far no major issues, other than swapping damn near every sensor to get it running right.
Great video! One issue I had though.... In 1980 the Seville Elegante had the 6.0 engine option which was a reliable engine. While their looks are in the eye of the beholder, I thought the 2 tone blue ones looked quite elegant with the bustleback trunks. Today with all the chrome etc, a nice one will get a lot of attention.
I was sketchy about the XLR because of it's short run and complex convertible top, but Wizard says it's ok so maybe I won't mind putting this one on my list of possibilities!
Just don't buy one with a bad fuel pump or non-functional top. Both are expensive to even consider. If you're handy, you might be able to figure out the top, but unless you have SKINNY arms, you have to pull the entire rear end, exhaust and transmission to drop the tanks to replace the fuel pump. Good news is that if you put the GM fuel system cleaner in every time you change the oil, the pump will probably never fail (though there were some pump recalls on the XLR, so maybe you'd get lucky).
@@theintrospective Damn, good to know! I'll be sure to keep all this in mind should I ever find myself staring one down at the dealership lol. And I consider myself pretty handy, I don't mind tackling seemingly difficult tasks I may have never done before. Like the time I replaced the convertible top on my old '02 Chrysler Sebring. Never done anything like that before, but I accomplished it!
The other issue with the XLR is insuring it. I want one but I've read that a replacement headlight used, from ebay can cost $5000, so if you take out the front end somehow, deer, get backed into, etc it will probably total the car. GM abandoned the XLR owners and don't make the parts anymore. I might pick one up still if I can find one cheap enough as a garage queen but I'm now leaning more toward a 2013+ Mercedes SL550. A lot more power, not that much more than a clean XLR, and parts are still made.
I had one of those bustle-back Sevilles! Same paint as in the picture! Was a really neat , comfortable, smooth riding car! I got rid of it before the 4100 gave me any problems, but while I had it, it was a nice car. ☺
I have a 2003 cadillac deville and its still on its 1st motor and its got 114000 miles and haven't had a single problem and I've been driving it for 7 years. I love how its still kinda like a land yacht. great sound system
I bought an Allante seven years ago. It's not true that they ever had an Italian-based engine. They did originally have a hand-built HT 4100. My 92 has a regular Cadillac 4.5 v8 and normal Eldorado running gear. Yes body parts are hard, but not impossible to find. Really, my only complaint at 117k miles is a transmission leak, a design flaw that plagues a lot of GM cars. I'd agree they aren't for the faint of heart, and really should be owned by someone who does a lot of things to their car themselves. If you do, it can be a cheap fun, and reasonably reliable 2-seat convertible that still attracts a fair amount of attention.
Entirely agree with you. I bought my first Allante about 5 years ago now which was a 1993 model. I loved it so much I bought a second one a year ago also 1993. I did have a 1990 Allante for a short time as I sold it and a few month later bought the second 1993 Allante that I drive right now. The first car has 198k and has been trouble free and very fun to drive. And it does attract attention from people asking about the car which I do not mind at all. Personally I love all years 1987-1993 Allante's but 1993 just because of a couple items that I like more.
Can you do a buick segment for the next video. I really appreciate the honesty and experience you have to offer for these videos. Thank you car wizard 🧙♂️
Neighbor had an 08 STS with the 3.6L bought it new and drove it to about 70,000 miles then gave to his grand daughter. He never had problems. He let me drive it when he was undergoing chemotherapy. It drove great! Loved the exterior on it. The diamond white paint is beautiful.
I had a 2006 Cadillac CTS, was not aware that it was available with a 4 cyl. I believe the choices were 2.8l or the 3.6l in the next gen there was a turbo 4cyl
I’m also surprised that the fleetwood 94-96 wasn’t mentioned. I didn’t own one but I did have a 94 Roadmaster sedan, same car pretty much. That thing is the most bulletproof cruiser GM ever made
@Caddie Guy They were the last REAL cars GM made, especially the Cadillac Fleetwood/Fleetwood Brougham, which, in my opinion, is a real man's car, anyway! My other favorite luxury car from that era is the Lincoln Town Car, which I've come to realize is a very underrated automobile that has that mature kind of sophistication and elegance about it.
lol the Seville with the drop back is one of my dream cars. I actually bought one in 2000. I was the only person on the planet who was unaware of the HT4100. The Cadillac dealer actually recommended an engine swap like 8 grand for a car I paid 900 dollars for. When I called around to get it fixed I had mechanics laughing at me and one literally gasped and groaned when I told him what it was. Oh well so much for my dream but the heart wants what the heart wants.
Taste is very subjective. I think they are incredible looking. True, mechanically it will be expensive with poor performance and power, but if you know that going in and have money, they are unlike anything on the road. You dont see them driven anymore.
>Shawn Boucher: Those were boiled down to 'weekend cruisers' 25 years ago due to the HT4100 an it's headgasket issues among other things. If you're handy with a wrench and some knowhow, and a stickler with maintenance schedules, they can be awesome cars.
Someone recently posted photo's of a '85 Eldorado that has 185K miles and in near pristine condition in a Facebook group. They didn't mention anything about the engine. I have seen quite a few E & K body cars listed with over 100K miles. Some of the issues are people not maintaining the engine like it should be. It was advised to use the stop leak tablets also. One thing I noticed when I changed the valve cover gaskets on my '84 Seville that the intake manifold bolts where not torqued to the factory service manual specs. Possibly loosened over time maybe. The car has only about 41K miles on it. Trust me I'd rather change a head gasket in this motor than in a newer one. Krist the newer motors are hell to work on.
My mother had a Cimarron that she bought as a two or three year old car.. For the same reason you stated I thought she made a bad purchase. It ended up being a great car (reliable). Had she not hit a deer with it she would probably still be driving it today.
I have a 2007 Cadillac CTS with the 3.6 variable valve timing engine in it, and I absolutely love it! It’s giving me very few problems and none of them had been major ones. It looks good it rides good the Transmission still shifts perfect. It doesn’t use a drop of oil. It’s been one great car I’ll tell you that. So I’m definitely sold on the 3.6 engine for sure! Now of course I’m one that changes my oil as it’s recommended and he was nothing but for synthetic oil in it as Cadillac recommends. So yes, I do baby and take good care of it of course. But you have to do that with any car. Lol my 2007 Cadillac CTS 3.6 is a fantastic Car!
I almost ended up getting a 2004 Cadillac DeVille for my first car, when I knew nothing about cars. Instead I went for a 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee with the 4.0. 7 years later, at 243,000 miles, It's still my daily driver.
I've had a few Caddies but surprisingly my most reliable one was my '05 CTS-V. Had it over 100K and had ZERO issues. Was showroom perfect when I traded it. What an outstanding car looking back. So glad they were 6MT only. :)
My dad drove cadillacs since before i was born. My first ride from the hospital as a new born was in a 85 el dorado. Dad still has it and now i have a 2015 ats and it has been a great car. Looking into buying a second car for the family and thats why im here! Yeah, japanese make some cheaper more reliable stuff but it feels good to follow in my dads footsteps in owning and driving a cadillca. Im never angry in traffic because i love what i drive ❤
You are correct Car Wizard!!! The 2005 to 2011 STS with the LH2 Northstar (and late 2004 SRX) is a great car! I have a 2005 STS 4 with the LH2 and all option packages (rare). It was $72,000 before taxes new.
1986 THRU 1996 RWD CADILLAC FLEETWOOD BROUGHAMS. BEST CADILLAC THAT WHERE EVER BUILD. ESPECIALLY THE 1994 THRU 1996 CADILLAC FLEETWOOD BROUGHAM. EXCELLENT AUTOMOBILE.
Couldn't agree more, they're amazing with an LT1, but i get along pretty well with my old slow 307. i get nothing in the realm of hp, but i sure get amazing gas mileage out of it. Best I've done is 30mpg, but my kickdown cable was disconnected and it's desmoged. I was driving downhill basically in 4th gear.
Thank you very much for doing the Cadillac one. I work at a Cadillac dealership and am around some of these vehicles every day, but I work in the detail department, so I don't really know how reliable they are. It's very helpful to get an informed opinion.
I been wanting to get one of these forever now. I'm close to just up and doing it but I never hear much about their reliability or how hard/easy they can be to maintain yourself.
@@micro7vista They aren't too bad. I've had the 1st gen SRX ('05 AWD Northstar) he mentioned in the "don't buy" and while I loved that thing, he's right about working on it (replacing the front blinker bulb took three hours). The XLR is a lot easier to get to things, but you've got to practically be on your knees or lying across the fender to get to anything. They are a hoot to own, but do NOT buy one with a problem with the top or fuel pump. Getting a knowledgeable mechanic to even LOOK at the top can cost you hundreds, and you have to tear the entire rear end out to drop the tank. $4k to replace a $200 part. Those are really the sore spots for maintenance on these. Remember to put the GM fuel system cleaner in the tank every time you change the oil, and the pump will probably last as long as the car does, though.
I just wanna say I own a 2012 impala 3.6 and 6 speed. I do maintain it with regular 4k oil changes but that's about all this car has ever really gotten. It had coil packs and spark plugs at 130k I'm currently at 160k I need a wheel bearing but that's really it. My car still runs smooth and I'm pretty hard on it to.
good engines, at least in the 2012-2020 impalas and 2011-present camaros. This guy's dislike of the 3.6 stems from other vehicles, most likely. Even Scotty Kilmer the infamous GM disliker has admitted they are good engines if you take care of them. This guy just needs to put it to rest and make a video admitting the 2012-2020 impala with 3.6 is a reliable engine, but i think he's too far deep into his opinion at this point. But we impala owners know he's not being intellectually honest.
I hate to admit it. But not to long, i think 6 months after i posted that comment. My car hit 201k miles. Was running great, it jumped timing. And i kept up on the oil changes and other basic maintenance as well. Wasnt very pleased in the end.
some people would say that's still a good made car making it to 201k. Also the timing chain isn't the worst of the worst repair as far as cost, but doing it at 201k miles puts you in a pickle. I bought mine at 191k, hope it lasts at least until 205k, i don't drive that much so that will take 3-4 years.@@justinclink1058
later ones are much better than the early 4.1. The 4.5 and 4.9 are fine, like anything it's dependent on who maintained the car and at the steal you can pick these up for they're an attractive buy especially if you do the work yourself.
I have to agree with the 2003 to 2007 CTS; I have a 2006 CTS-V. Gotta love a 6.0LS and a Tremec 6-speed manual. Even though it is 13 years old it does not look outdated. Very good ride and quiet on the highway without the tech overload that you have to put up with in new cars.
Loving my 2014 XTS VSport Platinum. 410 hp twin turbo V6. It displaces 3.6 liters but I've read this particular Caddy only engine is a totally different engine than the ubiquitous 3.6 GM V6 mentioned by Car Wizard.
So people cross shop late model Cadillacs with ones that are 20-40+ years older and a 1/4 or less of the price? Somewhere, someone is at a car lot looking at a CTS and wondering, "should I check out a Cimarron or Catera first?"? I say if you find a running Cimarron for a few hundred bucks, grab it. It's not the early 80's anymore; you're no longer paying a premium over a similar year Cavalier (which in itself would be just as rare).
I have a Cadillac Deville 2004. The check engine light has been in shop for emission issues two times and now it is back on all in a year. I also have a check coolant which has been in shop for and now back on. I have 90,000 miles. This is the most comfy car I have ever had. You just hit my car RATS and I am so glad I am looking for a VAN.
Hey wizard, I dont think the 2003-2007 CTS had any option besides the 3.6. 2003 had the option for 3.2 but i think thats it. I think it was until around 2014 that they had the 2.0 ecotec option
I noticed that as well. He also said the the XLR has an LS, but that's incorrect. It came with a Northstar, and it is said that that is what killed it in terms of popularity and sales.
I was looking for this comment. I'm like "wait there's an Ecotec powered old CTS I didn't know about?" I was so surprised he mentioned that car as a "to-buy."
Hi car wizard😁 I wondering if you can do an updated video about the 2012 to 20016 Cadillac SRX? I am in the market buying a new SUV and I am really leaning towards the 2015 Cadillac. I would greatly appreciate to hear your opinion on that vehicle! Thank you❤
I remember when those Sevilles first came out. I think Cadillac was trying for an homage to the boattail speedsters of the '30s. That rear end still looked bizarre back then. Once in a while I see a Cimarron in my neck of the woods.
As a guy who owns a 2004 Cadillac SRX with the V8, I do my own work and am restoring it and will say it’s horrible the lack of working room. I’m not going to lie I swear sometimes I could have engineered these better than gm did. But I will say she’s been reliable, powerful, and comfortable so I’m content. Plus it’s paid off so what can I say. Besides the cursing that is. I do like the new CTS and CT6. They are beautiful cars and the 4 cylinder has tons of room being rear wheel drive. You’re the best car wizard!
How is the Cadillac DTS? 2009-2011. It has northstar. I though of buying one instead of towncar due to front wheel drive. Towncar drives alot nicer in good weather though and is very reliable. I live up north.
Car Wizard, just what is it about the Cadillac 3.6L V6 engine that you are vehemently against buying any model that has one? Also, there have been multiple variations of this engine, so is one more problematic than another, or does your negative assessment apply to all of them?
Wizard .... I have to say as experienced in mainly gm motors the 3800 decent the north star 05 plus decent but the 3.6 was bad from 03 to 11 had issues, but 12- 20 has very little issues with timing maybe some electrical powersterring problems or an alternator but no timing issues in the 12 + I see em go 200k + but you dont talk bad on the 2.4 d.i ecotech in the traverse equinox ect . They burn so much oil ... yet all you say is the 3.6
I bought a 1985 Cadillac Eldorado Biarritz for $700,And drove it back 100 miles, it does have a 4.1 L V8, I drove it all over for the year I had it, even as a daily driver, it was actually pretty reliable for being a unrestored old car.
Actually My Mom had a Cimmeron and had zero problems with it. Gave it to my little brother when she bought something else. It was a FAST car. Had the V6 and ditched everything leaving a traffic light lol
I have to disagree about the 80-85 Seville. I bought one with a bad diesel, converting to 350 olds. I didn't like the backend, back in the day but now I like em. I bought as a collector car.
I think you should have expanded on your "To buy / Not to buy" series by years or generation. That way we can get comparisons of cars that are in a similar year group.
Unfortunately the reputation of the 4.6 Northstar followed them even after Cadillac resolved the problem. I had a 2006 sts that I sold privately because dealers wouldn't give you anything on trade. 12 years old with 36k when I sold it. Sometimes I wish I had kept it. Never any trouble.
I Thank God, I Graduated from Mechanic college & Unfortunately am Disabled however I took my Education Seriously, & still to this day I work on my 3.6L Cadillac STS
My father in law inherited an 85 Seville, never had a head gasket issue his the transmission didn't like to shift properly but it did shift and it was very reliable. So knocking on the Seville is kind of wrong considering it was actually a good running car from experience. I will say it's getting hard to find parts for my 91 Dodge now so an 85 is probably going to cost a small fortune now.
I still drive my 99 eldo northstar. Its not a daily driver anymore although i have 150k and only major repair was head gaskets at 93k professionally done by a caddy master tech self employed. My eldo is super clean and runs like a top.
I own and drive a 06 DTS as my daily. A little surprised that it didnt make the list lol. But I'm currently at 197k miles with no issues, most people still belive that northstars are horrible but then I show them mine. Thanks for the video wizard!
I actually watched this video to see if the DTS made the list. Im currently looking at a couple of 07's and trying to decide if I should by one of them.
@@quarter8773 unfortunately it didn't pan out and I didn't buy one. Ended up getting a Chrysler 300 instead. Still wish I would have been able to get a DTS but one of the ones I was looking at was in alot rougher condition in person than in the pictures. The other guy didn't want to show the car when I was able to go look at it and he stopped responding to my messages so I moved on. Bought the wife a Jeep Liberty instead and I started driving her Chrysler 300.
@@TeeroyHammermill well then you must unfortunately have been around some crappy ones lol. the last three I've owned been in pretty good shape. In fact I daily drive a 94 and gone through two winters. not a lick of rust. It's proof how taking good care of your car can make it last a long time
@@DrOldsmobile91 I agree... I have a 95 Fleetwood brougham, I love the lt1 engine and the soft suspension on them. To me, its the last good "actual" cadillac ever built. Any newer cadillacs 1997 or newer just arent the same(except the Escalade). They dont seem like cadillacs anymore. I also love the 90-92 brougham.
The most beautiful car Cadillac EVER made is there 1959 Cadillac Eldorado Brougham, and the 1959 Cadillac Mille-Meteor. All there 59' cars are just great. They are just so-so beautiful with there styling, the shapes and those awesome win
Really enjoy your videos. This is my XLR story. I loved the way XLR'S looked too. So much so, I bought a used one (with a limited warranty) at a Honda dealership without doing much research on it. It had 35,000 miles on it. It's a GM product, so finding parts for it really didn't concern me too much. What a mistake. About a month into it, the LEDs in the taillights started going out. No dealerships had them or could get them. I joined XLR chat groups looking for help. I was directed to a few junk yards. They wanted $3,000+ for a used set. Yes, $3,000 for a set that might work. I contacted the warranty company for help. They were not going to pay that, especially for used parts. I did find a guy in Indiana that was able to fix them in his garage for about $750. The warranty company did pay for that. While my XLR was at my local Cadillac dealership waiting for these taillights to get fixed, water got into the trunk area and burnt out a control panel. No dealerships had those in stock either, so I had to find one at a junkyard on the east coast. I contacted my warranty company for help. They would not pay for used parts. So i asked them to find me a new part, and they couldn't. So they paid for the used part. So when the taillights and control panel arrived, they put the car back together and everything worked great until....the check engine light came on as I drove away from the dealership. I drove it back and it was determined that an oil control valve in the engine (Northstar) was the cause. When it was removed, they showed me that it had broke in half. Dealerships did not have that part in stock either. So I called up the warranty company if they could find me a new oil control valve. They couldn't. So I found a used one at that east coast junk yard and the warranty company paid for that one. Once I got it, I took it to the dealership and they installed it and it worked. No more check engine light. I drove it home and decided that since everything worked, and the car still looked great, it was time to get rid of it. I sold it for almost what I paid for it. I would have probably kept it if it wasn't for the parts issue.
I disagree with you on the srx. My aunt had one of those that she bought brand new and drove it for 11 years with relatively no issues. The only reason she got rid of it was because it got totaled in an accident it had almost 200k on it when it got totaled also
2004+ Base & DHS Deville's Northstar has redesigned headbolts which have largely eliminated the gasket failure nightmare. The 2004 Deville DTS had a different version of the FWD Northstar which was fixed mid-model year. All RWD Northstars have seldom had failures. One problem with 2000-05 Devilles is window regulator failure--I had 3 Pop and Drop windows. The CT6 has a newer version of the 3.6 which hasn't had a rash of timing chain failures--so far.
My STS Northstar (it is an 07 and it is late 22) is amazing! Such a good, reliable, easy/cheap to fix car. It still has enough fancy stuff to hold up today. I did have to replace the motor mounts recently and now that I did it is damn near silent even when running. It is quieter than our 2018 Accord.
Nothing on the 94-96 Fleetwood aka Fleetwood Brougham. They were related to the Buick Roadmaster. Wonder is the 2011 DTS with last years of north star motor is ok. He recomended the STS with same motor.
I’ve got a 2011 DTS. 147k trouble free miles! Just a beautiful car and one of the very last off the line for the 2011 model year. There were a few built in 2012 with left over parts.
Technically not exactly the same, but it's "close enough." The transmission is different between STS and DTS, but I haven't heard anything bad about the 4T80E. It can't be any worse than the 4T65E at least :-). I've always wanted a 1993-1996 Fleetwood too. Actually test drove a couple in high school, but never followed through.
Forget the fleetwood brougham. Its not a real caddy what so ever but a dressed up chevy caprice. The Dts is the last real Caddy with the North star V8 which is all built by Cadillac.
The newer 3.6 engines, 2016 and up have fixed the issues of the older ones. Same as the Northstar being fixed, the 3.6 has been as well. The biggest problem we have had in my shop is thermostats needing to be replaced and it's a pretty easy job. They don't have the oil consumption issues anymore and the timing chains are updated so they don't stretch
I had an 85 Sedan Deville with the HT4100. I bought it from a co-worker's grandfather's estate with a freshly rebuilt engine and transmission. I drove it for a year before I gave it to my best friend's mother after her vehicle died. The rebuilt engine didn't last 20k miles before it threw a rod through the side of the block. It did get about 34MPG on the highway though, no power, decent torque, but it sipped fuel at steady cruise on the highway at 70MPH. I also had three early Northstars, a 94 Eldorado and 98 Eldorado that both had big oil leaks repaired before I bought them. The 98 had the head bolts replaced with studs at the dealer before I bought it. I also had a 2003 STS that I bought low mileage and it was still running perfect when I traded it at 100k miles, no problems with that one and it rode the nicest of any Cadillac I ever owned. I'm now in an 07 STS-V that is a blast to drive but even without getting into the supercharger I'm lucky to hit 19mpg over a 96 mile daily commute. I also fell in love with a hybrid, my 14 ELR, that is essentially a Chevy Volt on steroids and wearing a tuxedo. In the summer I can get 42 miles out of the battery, in the winter, about 29 miles out of the battery before the ICE kicks in to run the generator. I also have an 07 Escalade and an 03 EXT. I'd stay away from the 07-10 Escalades because of the bankruptcy years, GM seemed to skimp on the rustproofing. I've got 81k miles on my 07 and my mechanic tells me he's never seen so much rust under a vehicle. Every 07 I shopped for used had a ton of rust, mine was one of the better ones I came across and my 03 EXT has less rust and 100k more miles on it, both having lived on the east coast all their lives.
Video Correction. The XLR did not have an LS engine. Its is a Northstar. But not problematic like older Northstars.
But XLR production started in 2003 for the 2004 model year and it ran until 2009
That was what I was thinking while watching the video. The XLR does have the Northstar v8.
Car Wizard would love if you did a video looked this for Lincolns
Double correction on the CTS as well? (you mentioned it having a 4 cylinder)
I was gonna say, I personally would not buy and XLR just because your buying a Corvette without an LS.
Car Wizard is like a more rational, and above all, quieter, Scotty Kilmer....
Scotty would never put an Olds diesel into anything but a scrap pile.
Scotty Kilmer has no idea what he’s talking about
@@drlisp123 he does, but a lot of his opinions are decades out of date. He is right about how terrible most of the German car brands have become though.
Kilmer is a hack
I love Scotty!
The 3.6 V6 is a very good engine if you change the oil every 3,000 miles. My dad has a customer with a Traverse with the 3.6 with 250,000 miles. CHANGE YOUR OIL FOLKS
you right my 2014 traverse is a tank, strong smooth excellent motor 3.6 v6.
Over a period of 12 years, I owned two Cadillacs - both a 2000 DHS and a 2006 DTS. Both were used when I got them. They had 4.6L Northstar engines and never had an ounce of trouble with either of them. Big, solid, quiet and incredibly smooth.
best car ever dude!
Yea that’s bull ish! They are trash!
I got a 2013 Cadillac ATS with a 2.0 Turbo. Based off the Camaro platform...Things fast, fun, and still gets 30 mpg all day long. Oh and its a 6 speed manual.
How has the reliability been?
@@brianmcreynolds2431 the only real issue reliability wise has been the rear diff seals. They have been replaced twice within the last 80k. And my buddy who has a 2017 version of the almost identical car has the same issues, so it's not just me. But besides that, just oil changes and gas
@@nathangebben5738 yup I got a 13’ ATS 2.5 base and replace the rear differential about 4 years ago, recently changed the differential fluid. Other than that it’s been quite reliable besides oil changes, and I’m due for brakes soon . Had it for 7 years already got it at 40k miles and I’m at about 85k now, but thinking of trading in in the next year or 2 for either a Lexus es350, Lexus gs, Mazda 6, or even a ct6
I daily drove one for years, ended up selling it to my girlfriend because of my back issues. Still love driving it occasionally. Y coolant pipe, VVT solenoids, coil packs and a wheel bearing. Currently at 137k miles on a 2.0T AWD.
i wonder if hoovie just hears static noise when "buy that" comes up.
I know I always want to buy all the dont buys.
@@Gatecheverywhere Every other individual buys a lot of garbage vehicles.
Hoovies next car, the 1981 Cadillac Cimarron.
He will find an 83 because it had some bizarre update that made it more desirable yadda yadda yadda
In that case it would be the reverse: "I bought the most expensive Simeron in the USA.
But the cheapest one of those
@@joey69d Same thing.
That has had a 3.6 swapped into it!
I view the GM 3.6L the same way as I do the Northstar, certain specific motors and specific years are problematic so people jump to say they’re all bad. As I understand the majority of the issues that plagued the 3.6 were fixed with the LFX which came out for 2012 and was used in Impala, Lacrosse, Camaro, etc. furthermore using a good oil and doing maintenance regularly helps a lot. I have a 2004 CTS 3.6L (purchased new) with 212K miles and have never had an issue with timing chains or any problems related to the motor’s construction or design. I have always done regular maintenance on it and use the recommended Mobil 1. I also had a 14 Camaro with the 3.6L for a period of time and it also had no problems during my ownership. I’m not saying they’re problem free or the best motors ever made but I do believe with the right motor and keeping on top of maintenance you can get some longevity out of it. Just my own thoughts and personal experience. I also work in the automotive repair industry and from what I’ve seen motors that tend be problematic haven’t been maintained very well, prolonged oil changes using either an oil that doesn’t meet Dexos 1 standards or one that only barely meets the requirements and going 8K-10K miles on an oil change. They start to consume oil and are constantly being ran low on oil and thus problems start to arise. I always try to push for the full synthetics and stress to them to not wait for the OLM to tell them it’s time to change oil and I have to say I have a few customers that have higher mileage cars with these motors that have been pretty happy with them. Again just my own experience with these motors, not looking to argue or fight with anyone on this. There are most certainly certain years and specific 3.6 motors you shouldn’t touch with a 50 foot pole, but I truly don’t believe the newer ones are all THAT bad. I’m actually looking at replacing my other Cadillac with an 18 or 19 Impala or Lacrosse which is going to have a 3.6L, it’ll be my third.
dude my junkyard is slam full of gm 3.6s
Fairly new ones at that.
I've had multiple 3.6L GM motors, as well as family members who have had them. People have problems with them because most people don't do regular maintenance. I've never had major problems with any of mine. The only thing I've had to do is plugs and coil packs.
I am a big GM fan and imho the 3.6L is the best daily driver engine.
Really powerful and amazing on fuel for a V6. We had a 3.6L (loved it) and 3.0 (not an impressive engine)
But ofcourse nothing beats the smoothness of a V8.
@@user_mahmed i want a Cadillac 2016 CT’s-v twin turbo do you think that’s a good bye for a first car and reliable
@@jager454gaming i want a Cadillac 2016 CT’s-v twin turbo do you think that’s a good bye for a first car and reliable
I had a 2012 SRX with a 3.6 engine. Got it at 99k miles, sold it at 146k miles. GREAT ENGINE ! Engine flush when I bought it and full synthetic oil changes every 7-8k miles. Only repair I had to make was the accelerator position sensor for a whopping $58 .
I have a 2018 ATS with the 2.0 turbo and I love it. Just the base model without all the driver assist features.
It's funny how the US "small" segment is basically mid-sized here in Europe.
Andrzej Sawicki Americans are fatter we need bigger
I wish we had small cars. I want to pick up a Ford Festiva 😎
They're basically midsize here too, they're just the smallest Cadillac.
Robert Nickerson kinda interesting 😁
Well when gas prices are 4x higher over there ofc engines will be smaller across the board
That’s a Cavalier attitude you have about the Cimmaron.
That was pretty good.
I always thought "Cadalier or Cavillac".
What about the Cut era
First gen cts never had a 4 cylinder option, it was all v6 except for the cts-v. 2.8L and 3.6L high feature family, and 3.2 54 degree opel v6 for 2004 only.
2003 had a 3.2
@@Striker50_they never made a 4 cylinder
I figured the deal with the 3.6L is that they were just fine if you 1) changed the oil often and 2) drilled bigger holes in the PCV valves.
A lot of the engines had pcv valve issues. That was the main reason for head gaskets blowing on the 1st gen DTS engines and even on some 2nd gen if you got it before 09. They sell aftermarket ones with the right opening width tho to help with that back pressure
I change my oil every 2500 miles and run liquid moly. I also drilled out the pcv. 2012 CTS Performance. I run high mileage synthetic oil. Mobil.
@@MichaelJarvisEXTRAORDINAIRECould you show me where you had to drill ? I have a 2016 SRX with 60K and all the oil change records/maintenance etc. I need it to last as good as it is now.
@@steveschu there are some videos on you tube. That's how I found out. GM even put out a technical service bulletin. Basically your pcv has 3 holes. Just make the holes bigger then clean it out with carb cleaner.
@@steveschuthe pcv. It has two tiny holes on the bottom and one tiny hole on the top. The TSB says just to make the holes bigger. So drill em out
The sixties and seventies Eldorados are my favorite Cadillacs! The style is so damn cool!
I've test drive the CT6 at a car show couple years back and I will say the auto is not just only beautiful, but the ride and the aero dynamic of the car is superb.
It has a newer version of the 3.6 which doesn't have as many issues.
Would love to see a video outlining why the GM 3.6L is so poor like you did with the Northstar and the Ford, great to see your breakdown of the design flaws from a mechanic’s standpoint!
Well, I know your post is about a year old but with the 3.6 L they had timing chain issues due to stretching over time. But a way to prolong this is to frequently change the oil @3000 miles. We love our 06 CTS and it's very zippy!
Mine slipped timing an caught fire an I kept up with it changed the timing belt as well fyi it was done by the Stealership
@@waxman6442 i just used all my savings and bought a 3.6 cts 2011 I should've done my research I'm a debt 15k now hopefully its last
@@starlightandeverythingnice1650 These vehicles have Chains and not belts and they're not deemed a wear item, keep fresh oil and use a quality synthetic. I personally bring my own oil to the dealership even though I work at one! I've been using Mobil1 in my CTS and now I'm testing the waters with Amsoil in another vehicle and Liqui moly. By 2011 the timing chain issue wasn't really as big as an issue compared to older models.
We love our 3.6l malibu runs great
The Allante always used Cadillac engines, the dreaded 4.1, a later larger 4.5 liter version, and then the Northstar.
4.9💪🏾 1993 Cadillac deville! Running strong
I have a 2014 Cadillac ATS 2.0 T 39k miles. It has not had a single issue whatsoever and still zips around and when washed looks as new as day 1.
The North Star would have been great if they used head studs, steel thread inserts, or even a bigger sized bolt with a coarse thread.
it really was a snatching defeat from the jaws of victory moment for GM with the northstar. If they wanted to imitate the Germans; who also often love to riddle spectacular engineering with equally spectacular fail points; bravo.
They did. In 2005+ Northstar motors they used LS head bolts. I haven't heard a single case of a 2005+ motor blowing a head gasket, even on the Supercharged STS-V.
Why o why does GM always do something 80% awesome like Northstar and then “GM” the last 20%. Let’s use these head bolts from the parts bin and save few cents per bolt ... “GM’d” the whole engine. Fixed years (decade ....) later but too late. GM you are so frustrating- keep the bean counters out of the engineering dept and build quality like you are capable of from the start !!! Mary, are you getting this ??
It really is a shame as if it wasn't for the head issues the North Star engine would of been class leading for its time, also today there would be even more choice in the old luxury market for us cheapskates.
Fine thread. Machinist here.
Glad to hear i made a decent decision. I Just bought a 2010 Cadillac STS with the Northstar V8 paid $4k for it
How many miles?
Watch out for valve cover gasket leaks
My daughter bought a 2004 Cadillac SRX 3.6 for $650. The timing chain had jumped (TSB) on the interference motor. I swapped in a Fraser Engines Bullet-Proof crate motor, with a 5 year unlimited mileage warranty. Thus far no major issues, other than swapping damn near every sensor to get it running right.
we had a 3.6 di in an 08 cts, had 170000 when we traded it in. Absolutely no issues in the 5 years we had it.
My grandma bought a 07 CTS new with the 3.6. She still has it to this day and it's been problem free.
I was waiting to hear why he didnt recommend them
It’s sad, I love the Allanté. It’s got such a cool story, a great pedigree, and the 93 with the North Star isn’t slow
Great video! One issue I had though.... In 1980 the Seville Elegante had the 6.0 engine option which was a reliable engine. While their looks are in the eye of the beholder, I thought the 2 tone blue ones looked quite elegant with the bustleback trunks. Today with all the chrome etc, a nice one will get a lot of attention.
I was sketchy about the XLR because of it's short run and complex convertible top, but Wizard says it's ok so maybe I won't mind putting this one on my list of possibilities!
Just don't buy one with a bad fuel pump or non-functional top. Both are expensive to even consider. If you're handy, you might be able to figure out the top, but unless you have SKINNY arms, you have to pull the entire rear end, exhaust and transmission to drop the tanks to replace the fuel pump. Good news is that if you put the GM fuel system cleaner in every time you change the oil, the pump will probably never fail (though there were some pump recalls on the XLR, so maybe you'd get lucky).
@@theintrospective Damn, good to know! I'll be sure to keep all this in mind should I ever find myself staring one down at the dealership lol. And I consider myself pretty handy, I don't mind tackling seemingly difficult tasks I may have never done before. Like the time I replaced the convertible top on my old '02 Chrysler Sebring. Never done anything like that before, but I accomplished it!
The other issue with the XLR is insuring it. I want one but I've read that a replacement headlight used, from ebay can cost $5000, so if you take out the front end somehow, deer, get backed into, etc it will probably total the car. GM abandoned the XLR owners and don't make the parts anymore.
I might pick one up still if I can find one cheap enough as a garage queen but I'm now leaning more toward a 2013+ Mercedes SL550. A lot more power, not that much more than a clean XLR, and parts are still made.
Note Cadillac XLR doesn't come with ls motor as he mentioned it came with a 4.6l v8 Northstar engine idk why he said it came with a LS engine
I had one of those bustle-back Sevilles! Same paint as in the picture! Was a really neat , comfortable, smooth riding car! I got rid of it before the 4100 gave me any problems, but while I had it, it was a nice car. ☺
2002 to 2014 Escalades, both the 2nd and 3rd generation, are beautiful and reliable SUVs!
I have a 2003 cadillac deville and its still on its 1st motor and its got 114000 miles and haven't had a single problem and I've been driving it for 7 years. I love how its still kinda like a land yacht. great sound system
When the gasket blows, just move away from the car and get a new one, trust me on this! I have personal experience 👍
I was waiting this whole video to see how you felt about the Allante. All 6 Allante owners probably just unsubscribed
I luv mine but do agree parts and workability can be a problem i have been very lucky with my 90 White Pearl /Blk leather version
I bought an Allante seven years ago. It's not true that they ever had an Italian-based engine. They did originally have a hand-built HT 4100. My 92 has a regular Cadillac 4.5 v8 and normal Eldorado running gear. Yes body parts are hard, but not impossible to find. Really, my only complaint at 117k miles is a transmission leak, a design flaw that plagues a lot of GM cars. I'd agree they aren't for the faint of heart, and really should be owned by someone who does a lot of things to their car themselves. If you do, it can be a cheap fun, and reasonably reliable 2-seat convertible that still attracts a fair amount of attention.
Entirely agree with you. I bought my first Allante about 5 years ago now which was a 1993 model. I loved it so much I bought a second one a year ago also 1993. I did have a 1990 Allante for a short time as I sold it and a few month later bought the second 1993 Allante that I drive right now. The first car has 198k and has been trouble free and very fun to drive. And it does attract attention from people asking about the car which I do not mind at all. Personally I love all years 1987-1993 Allante's but 1993 just because of a couple items that I like more.
Can you do a buick segment for the next video. I really appreciate the honesty and experience you have to offer for these videos. Thank you car wizard 🧙♂️
Neighbor had an 08 STS with the 3.6L bought it new and drove it to about 70,000 miles then gave to his grand daughter. He never had problems. He let me drive it when he was undergoing chemotherapy. It drove great! Loved the exterior on it. The diamond white paint is beautiful.
I had a 2006 Cadillac CTS, was not aware that it was available with a 4 cyl. I believe the choices were 2.8l or the 3.6l in the next gen there was a turbo 4cyl
I’m also surprised that the fleetwood 94-96 wasn’t mentioned. I didn’t own one but I did have a 94 Roadmaster sedan, same car pretty much. That thing is the most bulletproof cruiser GM ever made
@Caddie Guy They were the last REAL cars GM made, especially the Cadillac Fleetwood/Fleetwood Brougham, which, in my opinion, is a real man's car, anyway! My other favorite luxury car from that era is the Lincoln Town Car, which I've come to realize is a very underrated automobile that has that mature kind of sophistication and elegance about it.
lol the Seville with the drop back is one of my dream cars. I actually bought one in 2000. I was the only person on the planet who was unaware of the HT4100. The Cadillac dealer actually recommended an engine swap like 8 grand for a car I paid 900 dollars for. When I called around to get it fixed I had mechanics laughing at me and one literally gasped and groaned when I told him what it was. Oh well so much for my dream but the heart wants what the heart wants.
Taste is very subjective. I think they are incredible looking. True, mechanically it will be expensive with poor performance and power, but if you know that going in and have money, they are unlike anything on the road. You dont see them driven anymore.
>Shawn Boucher: Those were boiled down to 'weekend cruisers' 25 years ago due to the HT4100 an it's headgasket issues among other things. If you're handy with a wrench and some knowhow, and a stickler with maintenance schedules, they can be awesome cars.
Someone recently posted photo's of a '85 Eldorado that has 185K miles and in near pristine condition in a Facebook group. They didn't mention anything about the engine. I have seen quite a few E & K body cars listed with over 100K miles. Some of the issues are people not maintaining the engine like it should be. It was advised to use the stop leak tablets also. One thing I noticed when I changed the valve cover gaskets on my '84 Seville that the intake manifold bolts where not torqued to the factory service manual specs. Possibly loosened over time maybe. The car has only about 41K miles on it. Trust me I'd rather change a head gasket in this motor than in a newer one. Krist the newer motors are hell to work on.
I heard that a lot of people used to swap a Chevy or Oldsmobile 350 in the HT4100 cars back in the day.
Even the worst engines will last forever if they are well maintained. You can also get them with the 4.1 buick v6 that's the engine to get.
My mother had a Cimarron that she bought as a two or three year old car.. For the same reason you stated I thought she made a bad purchase. It ended up being a great car (reliable). Had she not hit a deer with it she would probably still be driving it today.
I have a 2007 Cadillac CTS with the 3.6 variable valve timing engine in it, and I absolutely love it! It’s giving me very few problems and none of them had been major ones. It looks good it rides good the Transmission still shifts perfect. It doesn’t use a drop of oil. It’s been one great car I’ll tell you that. So I’m definitely sold on the 3.6 engine for sure! Now of course I’m one that changes my oil as it’s recommended and he was nothing but for synthetic oil in it as Cadillac recommends. So yes, I do baby and take good care of it of course. But you have to do that with any car. Lol my 2007 Cadillac CTS 3.6 is a fantastic Car!
Is the CTS still running?
How many miles are on it? Looking to get one that has 55,000 miles for 7,000$
@@elijahnicholson1017 i want a Cadillac 2016 CT’s-v twin turbo do you think that’s a good buy for a first car and reliable
i want a Cadillac 2016 CT’s-v twin turbo do you think that’s a good buy for a first car and reliable
My wife has a 1993 Allante and loves it. No real problems and it screams power. My mechanic loves driving it. I've had it 3 years. Great Car whatever.
I almost ended up getting a 2004 Cadillac DeVille for my first car, when I knew nothing about cars. Instead I went for a 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee with the 4.0.
7 years later, at 243,000 miles, It's still my daily driver.
You made the right choice. That caddy prolly would've died by now.
I've had a few Caddies but surprisingly my most reliable one was my '05 CTS-V. Had it over 100K and had ZERO issues. Was showroom perfect when I traded it. What an outstanding car looking back. So glad they were 6MT only. :)
Car Wizard: Which CTS models have the 4cyl engine? Prefer a 2.0T but it doesn't appear that it's a 2003-2007 option.
My dad drove cadillacs since before i was born. My first ride from the hospital as a new born was in a 85 el dorado. Dad still has it and now i have a 2015 ats and it has been a great car. Looking into buying a second car for the family and thats why im here! Yeah, japanese make some cheaper more reliable stuff but it feels good to follow in my dads footsteps in owning and driving a cadillca. Im never angry in traffic because i love what i drive ❤
You are correct Car Wizard!!! The 2005 to 2011 STS with the LH2 Northstar (and late 2004 SRX) is a great car! I have a 2005 STS 4 with the LH2 and all option packages (rare). It was $72,000 before taxes new.
1986 THRU 1996 RWD CADILLAC FLEETWOOD BROUGHAMS. BEST CADILLAC THAT WHERE EVER BUILD. ESPECIALLY THE 1994 THRU 1996 CADILLAC FLEETWOOD BROUGHAM. EXCELLENT AUTOMOBILE.
He is in the hearse version here
Cadillac Seville 5.7 liter engine rocks
Couldn't agree more, they're amazing with an LT1, but i get along pretty well with my old slow 307. i get nothing in the realm of hp, but i sure get amazing gas mileage out of it. Best I've done is 30mpg, but my kickdown cable was disconnected and it's desmoged. I was driving downhill basically in 4th gear.
You got me to considering getting one now. Seriously.
The slowham
I love these Buy and Not Buy segments. Super enjoyable and informative!!
Thank you very much for doing the Cadillac one. I work at a Cadillac dealership and am around some of these vehicles every day, but I work in the detail department, so I don't really know how reliable they are. It's very helpful to get an informed opinion.
I literally want a bustle back because my grandpa had one and Im nostalgic for it. Lol.
The trick is with the 3.6 is to change the oil often, like 3000 mile intervals.
The xlr does not have an ls motor it has a North Star engine
Agreed, it had two different variations of the Northstar. The CTS-V has the LS engine
There's a pinned post explaining that.
Yes i am sitting in my XLR eating some apple pie.
I been wanting to get one of these forever now. I'm close to just up and doing it but I never hear much about their reliability or how hard/easy they can be to maintain yourself.
@@micro7vista They aren't too bad. I've had the 1st gen SRX ('05 AWD Northstar) he mentioned in the "don't buy" and while I loved that thing, he's right about working on it (replacing the front blinker bulb took three hours). The XLR is a lot easier to get to things, but you've got to practically be on your knees or lying across the fender to get to anything. They are a hoot to own, but do NOT buy one with a problem with the top or fuel pump. Getting a knowledgeable mechanic to even LOOK at the top can cost you hundreds, and you have to tear the entire rear end out to drop the tank. $4k to replace a $200 part. Those are really the sore spots for maintenance on these. Remember to put the GM fuel system cleaner in the tank every time you change the oil, and the pump will probably last as long as the car does, though.
Thank god for this video. I almost forgot to go out and put the top up.
@@micro7vista friend bought a V6 to do an LS swap...
i envy you
Love this video!! People don’t give caddy’s enough love. I love the 1990’s cadillacs and late 2010’s.
I just wanna say I own a 2012 impala 3.6 and 6 speed. I do maintain it with regular 4k oil changes but that's about all this car has ever really gotten. It had coil packs and spark plugs at 130k I'm currently at 160k I need a wheel bearing but that's really it. My car still runs smooth and I'm pretty hard on it to.
good engines, at least in the 2012-2020 impalas and 2011-present camaros. This guy's dislike of the 3.6 stems from other vehicles, most likely. Even Scotty Kilmer the infamous GM disliker has admitted they are good engines if you take care of them. This guy just needs to put it to rest and make a video admitting the 2012-2020 impala with 3.6 is a reliable engine, but i think he's too far deep into his opinion at this point. But we impala owners know he's not being intellectually honest.
I hate to admit it. But not to long, i think 6 months after i posted that comment. My car hit 201k miles. Was running great, it jumped timing. And i kept up on the oil changes and other basic maintenance as well. Wasnt very pleased in the end.
some people would say that's still a good made car making it to 201k. Also the timing chain isn't the worst of the worst repair as far as cost, but doing it at 201k miles puts you in a pickle. I bought mine at 191k, hope it lasts at least until 205k, i don't drive that much so that will take 3-4 years.@@justinclink1058
I'm stoked. Just picked up my first Cadillac. Got a 2008 STS V8 and I'm loving it. Glad to see I didn't pick wrong.
NOOOO... you broke my heart with the Allente on not to buy. They are BEAUTIFUL!
Buy what you like he's wrong.
later ones are much better than the early 4.1. The 4.5 and 4.9 are fine, like anything it's dependent on who maintained the car and at the steal you can pick these up for they're an attractive buy especially if you do the work yourself.
I have to agree with the 2003 to 2007 CTS; I have a 2006 CTS-V. Gotta love a 6.0LS and a Tremec 6-speed manual. Even though it is 13 years old it does not look outdated. Very good ride and quiet on the highway without the tech overload that you have to put up with in new cars.
Loving my 2014 XTS VSport Platinum. 410 hp twin turbo V6. It displaces 3.6 liters but I've read this particular Caddy only engine is a totally different engine than the ubiquitous 3.6 GM V6 mentioned by Car Wizard.
As long as you run premium all the time to avoid the carbon build up. I have the premium.
So people cross shop late model Cadillacs with ones that are 20-40+ years older and a 1/4 or less of the price? Somewhere, someone is at a car lot looking at a CTS and wondering, "should I check out a Cimarron or Catera first?"?
I say if you find a running Cimarron for a few hundred bucks, grab it. It's not the early 80's anymore; you're no longer paying a premium over a similar year Cavalier (which in itself would be just as rare).
I have a Cadillac Deville 2004. The check engine light has been in shop for emission issues two times and now it is back on all in a year. I also have a check coolant which has been in shop for and now back on. I have 90,000 miles. This is the most comfy car I have ever had. You just hit my car RATS and I am so glad I am looking for a VAN.
The CTS never came with a 4 cylinder in those years, the options were a 2.8 V6, a 3.2 and the 3.6.
thanks i can stop searching lmao
My 2018 is a 4 cylinder 2.0 turbo cts
Hey wizard, I dont think the 2003-2007 CTS had any option besides the 3.6. 2003 had the option for 3.2 but i think thats it. I think it was until around 2014 that they had the 2.0 ecotec option
I noticed that as well. He also said the the XLR has an LS, but that's incorrect. It came with a Northstar, and it is said that that is what killed it in terms of popularity and sales.
I have a 2.8 2006 its either the 3.6 or 2.8 then the next gen is either 3.0 or 3.6
They have a 2.8L but it is still a 6 cylinder. I don’t believe anything this guy says now😂
I was looking for this comment. I'm like "wait there's an Ecotec powered old CTS I didn't know about?" I was so surprised he mentioned that car as a "to-buy."
your opinion on a low mileage - early to mid 90s -- 4.9 V8 ? early seville and devilles' had them .
Hi car wizard😁
I wondering if you can do an updated video about the 2012 to 20016 Cadillac SRX? I am in the market buying a new SUV and I am really leaning towards the 2015 Cadillac. I would greatly appreciate to hear your opinion on that vehicle! Thank you❤
They fixed the head gaskets for the 2005 model year. So you can get the Deville for the 2005 model year.
Can you do “buy this not that” for Lincoln?
Tyler Dunnam : I'd bet he'd say: Don't buy ANY Lincoln's unless its a 1964 Continental lol
Lincoln town car no ohters.
Lincoln Town Car and Navigator with the 5.4 4V.
@@endutubecensorship I got a 76 its got crappy power I'd must admit but rides well
Luis Gonzalez: I'd bet the ol girl is begging for the emissions to be removed and maybe a cam + heads.
That boat would fly
I actually like the Seville. They look so weird but cool
The bustle back Seville was from 80-85. Not the sexy 1976-1979 one. Introduce in late 1979 the bustle back was hideous.
I remember when those Sevilles first came out. I think Cadillac was trying for an homage to the boattail speedsters of the '30s. That rear end still looked bizarre back then. Once in a while I see a Cimarron in my neck of the woods.
Cimarrons are all rotted out in my area🤣
As a guy who owns a 2004 Cadillac SRX with the V8, I do my own work and am restoring it and will say it’s horrible the lack of working room. I’m not going to lie I swear sometimes I could have engineered these better than gm did. But I will say she’s been reliable, powerful, and comfortable so I’m content. Plus it’s paid off so what can I say. Besides the cursing that is. I do like the new CTS and CT6. They are beautiful cars and the 4 cylinder has tons of room being rear wheel drive.
You’re the best car wizard!
How is the Cadillac DTS? 2009-2011. It has northstar. I though of buying one instead of towncar due to front wheel drive. Towncar drives alot nicer in good weather though and is very reliable. I live up north.
That is the magnificent front end on that Fleetwood. Beautiful
Car Wizard, just what is it about the Cadillac 3.6L V6 engine that you are vehemently against buying any model that has one? Also, there have been multiple variations of this engine, so is one more problematic than another, or does your negative assessment apply to all of them?
Wizard .... I have to say as experienced in mainly gm motors the 3800 decent the north star 05 plus decent but the 3.6 was bad from 03 to 11 had issues, but 12- 20 has very little issues with timing maybe some electrical powersterring problems or an alternator but no timing issues in the 12 + I see em go 200k + but you dont talk bad on the 2.4 d.i ecotech in the traverse equinox ect . They burn so much oil ... yet all you say is the 3.6
I bought a 1985 Cadillac Eldorado Biarritz for $700,And drove it back 100 miles, it does have a 4.1 L V8, I drove it all over for the year I had it, even as a daily driver, it was actually pretty reliable for being a unrestored old car.
Actually My Mom had a Cimmeron and had zero problems with it. Gave it to my little brother when she bought something else. It was a FAST car. Had the V6 and ditched everything leaving a traffic light lol
I have to disagree about the 80-85 Seville. I bought one with a bad diesel, converting to 350 olds. I didn't like the backend, back in the day but now I like em. I bought as a collector car.
I’m glad to see that your channel has grown so much so fast. Appreciate the wealth of knowledge you provide!
I think you should have expanded on your "To buy / Not to buy" series by years or generation. That way we can get comparisons of cars that are in a similar year group.
Unfortunately the reputation of the 4.6 Northstar followed them even after Cadillac resolved the problem. I had a 2006 sts that I sold privately because dealers wouldn't give you anything on trade. 12 years old with 36k when I sold it. Sometimes I wish I had kept it. Never any trouble.
I Thank God, I Graduated from Mechanic college & Unfortunately am Disabled however I took my Education Seriously, & still to this day I work on my 3.6L Cadillac STS
I owned a 4.5L Allante. It was a fun car and honestly wasn't too hard on my wallet. I kind of wish I kept it. YMMV.
Hi dear, what do u think about the CT5 Blackwing LT4 engine 6.2 supercharger with 6 speed manual?
I daily drive a 90 deville and I love it.
My father in law inherited an 85 Seville, never had a head gasket issue his the transmission didn't like to shift properly but it did shift and it was very reliable. So knocking on the Seville is kind of wrong considering it was actually a good running car from experience. I will say it's getting hard to find parts for my 91 Dodge now so an 85 is probably going to cost a small fortune now.
I Like this guy.
He seems legit,
straight forward,
and he knows his Cadillacs
No he doesn't he said the Cadillac cts 03-07 came with a 4 cylinder 😂 they only came in 3.2 3.6 2.8L and the v8
I still drive my 99 eldo northstar.
Its not a daily driver anymore although i have 150k and only major repair was head gaskets at 93k professionally done by a caddy master tech self employed.
My eldo is super clean and runs like a top.
I own and drive a 06 DTS as my daily. A little surprised that it didnt make the list lol. But I'm currently at 197k miles with no issues, most people still belive that northstars are horrible but then I show them mine. Thanks for the video wizard!
I actually watched this video to see if the DTS made the list. Im currently looking at a couple of 07's and trying to decide if I should by one of them.
@@slowmaroz2883 I’m currently looking at a 06 dts 120 miles for 2800 lemme know if it was worth it if u got it
@@slowmaroz2883 120k
@@quarter8773 unfortunately it didn't pan out and I didn't buy one. Ended up getting a Chrysler 300 instead. Still wish I would have been able to get a DTS but one of the ones I was looking at was in alot rougher condition in person than in the pictures. The other guy didn't want to show the car when I was able to go look at it and he stopped responding to my messages so I moved on. Bought the wife a Jeep Liberty instead and I started driving her Chrysler 300.
Thanks for the heads up 00-05 deville but im sad I love that car and how it looks 😭
No mention of the 94 through 96 Fleetwood but then again I want that to be a secret kept to myself haha
Great car.
Those were great cars but their interiors fell apart and hidden rust would take out the electrical system as they aged. The powertrain was rock solid.
@@TeeroyHammermill well then you must unfortunately have been around some crappy ones lol. the last three I've owned been in pretty good shape. In fact I daily drive a 94 and gone through two winters. not a lick of rust. It's proof how taking good care of your car can make it last a long time
@@TeeroyHammermill granted I did buy a pretty rust-free one from the start but still lol
@@DrOldsmobile91 I agree... I have a 95 Fleetwood brougham, I love the lt1 engine and the soft suspension on them. To me, its the last good "actual" cadillac ever built. Any newer cadillacs 1997 or newer just arent the same(except the Escalade). They dont seem like cadillacs anymore. I also love the 90-92 brougham.
The most beautiful car Cadillac EVER made is there 1959 Cadillac Eldorado Brougham, and the 1959 Cadillac Mille-Meteor.
All there 59' cars are just great.
They are just so-so beautiful with there styling, the shapes and those awesome win
Really enjoy your videos. This is my XLR story.
I loved the way XLR'S looked too. So much so, I bought a used one (with a limited warranty) at a Honda dealership without doing much research on it. It had 35,000 miles on it. It's a GM product, so finding parts for it really didn't concern me too much. What a mistake. About a month into it, the LEDs in the taillights started going out. No dealerships had them or could get them. I joined XLR chat groups looking for help. I was directed to a few junk yards. They wanted $3,000+ for a used set. Yes, $3,000 for a set that might work. I contacted the warranty company for help. They were not going to pay that, especially for used parts. I did find a guy in Indiana that was able to fix them in his garage for about $750. The warranty company did pay for that. While my XLR was at my local Cadillac dealership waiting for these taillights to get fixed, water got into the trunk area and burnt out a control panel. No dealerships had those in stock either, so I had to find one at a junkyard on the east coast. I contacted my warranty company for help. They would not pay for used parts. So i asked them to find me a new part, and they couldn't. So they paid for the used part. So when the taillights and control panel arrived, they put the car back together and everything worked great until....the check engine light came on as I drove away from the dealership. I drove it back and it was determined that an oil control valve in the engine (Northstar) was the cause. When it was removed, they showed me that it had broke in half. Dealerships did not have that part in stock either. So I called up the warranty company if they could find me a new oil control valve. They couldn't. So I found a used one at that east coast junk yard and the warranty company paid for that one. Once I got it, I took it to the dealership and they installed it and it worked. No more check engine light. I drove it home and decided that since everything worked, and the car still looked great, it was time to get rid of it. I sold it for almost what I paid for it. I would have probably kept it if it wasn't for the parts issue.
Mrs. Wizard always asks good questions
Only 3 words come to mind with the early 3.6 engines: TIMING CHAIN FAILURE.
What about the 3.6 VVTs?
@@hotwheel6663 All garbage with General Motors, but not with Chrysler (Pentastar engine).
2.8 and 3.0 engines too.
I disagree with you on the srx. My aunt had one of those that she bought brand new and drove it for 11 years with relatively no issues. The only reason she got rid of it was because it got totaled in an accident it had almost 200k on it when it got totaled also
2004+ Base & DHS Deville's Northstar has redesigned headbolts which have largely eliminated the gasket failure nightmare. The 2004 Deville DTS had a different version of the FWD Northstar which was fixed mid-model year. All RWD Northstars have seldom had failures. One problem with 2000-05 Devilles is window regulator failure--I had 3 Pop and Drop windows.
The CT6 has a newer version of the 3.6 which hasn't had a rash of timing chain failures--so far.
My STS Northstar (it is an 07 and it is late 22) is amazing! Such a good, reliable, easy/cheap to fix car. It still has enough fancy stuff to hold up today. I did have to replace the motor mounts recently and now that I did it is damn near silent even when running. It is quieter than our 2018 Accord.
I'm thinking about purchasing one myself! My main question was how costly it would be to fix. Thanks!
also, do you have the 3.6 liter v6?
Nothing on the 94-96 Fleetwood aka Fleetwood Brougham. They were related to the Buick Roadmaster. Wonder is the 2011 DTS with last years of north star motor is ok. He recomended the STS with same motor.
I’ve got a 2011 DTS. 147k trouble free miles! Just a beautiful car and one of the very last off the line for the 2011 model year. There were a few built in 2012 with left over parts.
Technically not exactly the same, but it's "close enough." The transmission is different between STS and DTS, but I haven't heard anything bad about the 4T80E. It can't be any worse than the 4T65E at least :-). I've always wanted a 1993-1996 Fleetwood too. Actually test drove a couple in high school, but never followed through.
Do it properly and get a 1983-86 Fleetwood Brougham
Forget the fleetwood brougham. Its not a real caddy what so ever but a dressed up chevy caprice. The Dts is the last real Caddy with the North star V8 which is all built by Cadillac.
What does everyone think of the early 90s 4.9 v8 cadillac engine? I've heard this one isn't a North star. Is it decent?
Great motor I have it in my 92 eldorado. Just lacks horsepower
What about the GM 3.6 VVT Engine?
I have one in a 2012 Impala.
The newer 3.6 engines, 2016 and up have fixed the issues of the older ones. Same as the Northstar being fixed, the 3.6 has been as well. The biggest problem we have had in my shop is thermostats needing to be replaced and it's a pretty easy job. They don't have the oil consumption issues anymore and the timing chains are updated so they don't stretch
I had an 85 Sedan Deville with the HT4100. I bought it from a co-worker's grandfather's estate with a freshly rebuilt engine and transmission. I drove it for a year before I gave it to my best friend's mother after her vehicle died. The rebuilt engine didn't last 20k miles before it threw a rod through the side of the block.
It did get about 34MPG on the highway though, no power, decent torque, but it sipped fuel at steady cruise on the highway at 70MPH.
I also had three early Northstars, a 94 Eldorado and 98 Eldorado that both had big oil leaks repaired before I bought them. The 98 had the head bolts replaced with studs at the dealer before I bought it. I also had a 2003 STS that I bought low mileage and it was still running perfect when I traded it at 100k miles, no problems with that one and it rode the nicest of any Cadillac I ever owned.
I'm now in an 07 STS-V that is a blast to drive but even without getting into the supercharger I'm lucky to hit 19mpg over a 96 mile daily commute. I also fell in love with a hybrid, my 14 ELR, that is essentially a Chevy Volt on steroids and wearing a tuxedo. In the summer I can get 42 miles out of the battery, in the winter, about 29 miles out of the battery before the ICE kicks in to run the generator.
I also have an 07 Escalade and an 03 EXT. I'd stay away from the 07-10 Escalades because of the bankruptcy years, GM seemed to skimp on the rustproofing. I've got 81k miles on my 07 and my mechanic tells me he's never seen so much rust under a vehicle. Every 07 I shopped for used had a ton of rust, mine was one of the better ones I came across and my 03 EXT has less rust and 100k more miles on it, both having lived on the east coast all their lives.