As a layman, Juniors and seniors that think they smart must learn from you. There are lawyers that can question and Succeed and there are lawyers that's on the payroll......? Affidavits, only one answer "facts" not fraud.
Family Court Australia accepts theories and assumptions even stated as theories and assumptions, and does not penalise for perjury siting too many cases to prosecute! Why it’s accepted and understood that so many lies are told that investigating them all would take too long and also treat those lies as facts is mind boggling to me.
Great video. I did not realise there was a difference between affidavit and pleading before. GK thank you for your entertaining and enlightening online law lesson.
Hi, Mr, I'm wondering whether an affidavit is governed under the evidence act 1950? I notice that section 2 mention affidavit however I'm having trouble understanding the section. I hope that you could enlighten me on this. tq
You are right! The section suggests that the Rules of Evidence in the Evidence Act do not apply to affidavits. So hearsay evidence is accepted in affidavits. But taken too far, this interpretation will bring about injustice. We are thinking of doing more on affidavits-subject to availability of time-so keep your eyes peeled!
GK you have expertly explained about an 'affidavit ' and how and when it is applied.Thank you, But away from it ,another is a political venture being initiated by some MPS or Politicians, that is the talk of a 'Hybrid ' Parliament.What does it mean,is it a psychological or political manoeuvre openly done to distract Parliament proper,where political support by votes of influence practised or adapted is subject to further questioning ?Am I partly correct or wrong?, Please GKtv advise me and others for a wider understanding of such a move.tq Sir.
Sir can the SC mandated income affidavit format (for CRPc125A) be altered such as removing the questionnaires and Declaration paragraph enable to suit one owns narrative? Can this be prosecuted for perjury and lying for giving false affidavit?
I apologise. I am unable to answer this question because it is fact and jurisdiction sensitive. The answer I give can go in several directions depending on what was said or what was removed and what the state of statutory provisions are in your state/country. I suggest you seek a lawyer familiar with this area of law in your town or jurisdiction. But thank you for asking the question.
![🔴 ฟุตบอลแชมป์กีฬา 7HD แชมเปียน คัพ 2024 [รอบรองชนะเลิศ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zPm8ClLVhoE/mqdefault.jpg)
Crystal clear explanation. As a person with no legal qualification I understood this video. Well done GK. Keep the videos coming
Thanks, will do!
Mr GK, you don't hold back.
It's a definite bonus to the legal profession.
Aiyo yo.... You're right about this, there can only be one statement of truth per paragraph.
Thank you for keeping us legally informed!
You are welcome.
Excellent share, have passed it to my juniors
You are welcome. Thank you for supporting our GKtv
Precious! Thanks GK for sharing this.
You are welcome. Thank you for supporting our GKtv
Precious knowledge. Thank you for sharing.
You are welcome. Thank you for supporting our GKtv
This is informative. Love the opening rift. Well done.
Thanks Ananth
Thank you for supporting our GKtv
As a layman, Juniors and seniors that think they smart must learn from you. There are lawyers that can question and Succeed and there are lawyers that's on the payroll......? Affidavits, only one answer "facts" not fraud.
Thank you for your comments sir. Appreciated.
Thank you GK . Enjoy your informative videos thank you
Manubhai!
Thank you GK and team.
You are welcome.
Well explained Mr GK. Thank you
Saravanesh! Thanks man! How are you!
i press "like" and ring the "bell"...
Thank you
THANK YOU SO MUCH! Very informative 🌸 Please do more videos 😍
Thank you! Will do!
Well explained GK sir thank you 🙏
You are welcome. Thank you for supporting our GKtv
A good law Professor!!!
I really enjoy watching your videos. Very informative, precise, and never fail to entertain. Keep the great work going, Mr GK👍👌
Thank you Mani
Correct
Thank you
Family Court Australia accepts theories and assumptions even stated as theories and assumptions, and does not penalise for perjury siting too many cases to prosecute! Why it’s accepted and understood that so many lies are told that investigating them all would take too long and also treat those lies as facts is mind boggling to me.
Awesome!
Thank you for your comment
Great video. I did not realise there was a difference between affidavit and pleading before. GK thank you for your entertaining and enlightening online law lesson.
Thanks you!
Good point
Thanks to Mr Ganesan for making law so simple
You are welcome. One tries.
Good advice for young lawyers
Thank you
Why is this more interesting than all the theoretical subjects that I am studying now for my law degree 🤣.
Thank you Sir !
Most welcome!
Perfection perfection perfection thank you
Thank you for your kind words Debra
👍👍👍
You are welcome. Thank you for supporting our GKtv
excellent explanation! As part of my training in law this is truly very helpful.
Glad it was of assistance
@@GKganesan Sir any videos on writing for closing submissions?
Excellent explanation.
Glad it was helpful!
Hi, Mr, I'm wondering whether an affidavit is governed under the evidence act 1950? I notice that section 2 mention affidavit however I'm having trouble understanding the section. I hope that you could enlighten me on this. tq
You are right! The section suggests that the Rules of Evidence in the Evidence Act do not apply to affidavits. So hearsay evidence is accepted in affidavits. But taken too far, this interpretation will bring about injustice. We are thinking of doing more on affidavits-subject to availability of time-so keep your eyes peeled!
@@GKganesan please do sir!
GK you have expertly explained about an 'affidavit ' and how and when it is applied.Thank you, But away from it ,another is a political venture being initiated by some MPS or Politicians, that is the talk of a 'Hybrid ' Parliament.What does it mean,is it a psychological or political manoeuvre openly done to distract Parliament proper,where political support by votes of influence practised or adapted is subject to further questioning ?Am I partly correct or wrong?, Please GKtv advise me and others for a wider understanding of such a move.tq Sir.
Thank you Sir and it's really very helpful 🙏
Most welcome
Thank you 🙏
You’re welcome 😊
Can Tuan GK cite the relevant precedents which address the mistake?
Thank you
You're welcome
Sir could you share some tips on effective legal writing for law students? Thank you
I can. When I have time.
Thank u
Welcome
Affidavit filed in court by plantiff... Can plantiff once again defend themselves we have filed false facts in affidavit which is filed in court
Sir can the SC mandated income affidavit format (for CRPc125A) be altered such as removing the questionnaires and Declaration paragraph enable to suit one owns narrative? Can this be prosecuted for perjury and lying for giving false affidavit?
I apologise. I am unable to answer this question because it is fact and jurisdiction sensitive.
The answer I give can go in several directions depending on what was said or what was removed and what the state of statutory provisions are in your state/country.
I suggest you seek a lawyer familiar with this area of law in your town or jurisdiction.
But thank you for asking the question.