Interesting fact : Garuda Indonesia Flight 421 actually ditch in Bengawan Solo river on January 16 2002 after both engines flameout in bad weather in fact, that accident is very similar to TACA Flight 110 because both accident flights are the Boeing 737 300 . Play RFS, TFS or Xplane if you guys want to recreate Miracle on the Hudson
one thing you did get wrong swiss is that they lost their engines at around 3000 feet, and not 5000 feet. This means also that they were way lower and losing altitude after reaching 3000 feet. So they really couldn't have made it back
They could have actually made it if they turned back immediately after striking the birds, but by the time it took Sully and Jeffery to comprehend what had happened and run through checklists it was too late to try to make it back
@@gaztastic oh I know that but in an emergency it is procedure for the captain to take control of the plane or the first officer if the captain is incapacitated
Fact: A couple days ago we are all remembering Air Florida Flight 90. A 737-200 flying from Washington DCA to Fort Lauderdale that had ice on the wings and crashed in the Potomac River, killing almost everyone, and only 3 survived. People on the bridge actually jumped into the water to help save people, none of the people from the bridge died in the water.
Same lol. Everyone knows that if an engine failure happens you just ditch the aircraft. It’s in the checklist of all flights with engine failures. Like Air France 447 the pilots just jumped without jumping and just let the plane crash just like the checklist.
As most other people are stating, the real flight lost the engines at around 3000 feet. (This simulator recreation was wrong because of the person who made it) Another issue with this is MSFS itself. In the sim, it is not only the wrong plane, A320 NEO instead of the older CEO... in the sim the A320 neo has always been somewhat overpowered, along with the fact that it is already slightly more powerful than the older CEO in the first place, MSFS in unrealistic in the speed of the a320. With that info, the entire "recreation" in MSFS is completely wrong; you can only get back to the airport because the bird strike happened way higher than it did in real life (1) and (2) the A320 neo in MSFS is more powerful than the real NEO irl, AND to add on to that; even the real life NEO is already more powerful than the A320 that actually landed in the hudson, making it so you had much more speed and height in the sim. This is why you were able to go back to the airport, instead of having to go into the hudson.
it's really cool to see a youtube channel you used to watch for a long time, and it continues to grow and gaining many subscribers, but it's not just because you watch your videos that he goes to your house and says: -thx! and back. it's pretty cool to have a yt channel that you like to watch, SERIOUSLY I'll turn nights I just watch video sometimes, but at the same time it's fuck realize that you are just a viewer that you will never be noticed by channel owner, who is busy and doesn't see your comment because the box input is full, and that's why there are HATERS they are they talk bad about you so that you notice them, but even so I watch a lot this channel and I hope it continues to grow, OBVIOUSLY, this is only going to be a useless comment in the midst of millions where not even the owner will notice, but that's it congratulations swiss001
@@roxout5743 the RAT supplies the blue hydraulic system and not the green and yellow ( blue is a sort of back up system in normal operation it is powered by an electric pump and in emergency by the RAT, the yellow system is powered by engine no 2 in the air or by the green system through the PTU. Same goes for the green system(only it is powered by engine no1)) so the thing is the green and yellow systems are connected by the PTU (no liquid transfer tho) but the blue is a completely independent system. And long story short the landing gear is supplied by the green system so even if the RAT came out they could not have lowered the landing gear hydraulically… but they could have used the gravity extender (red lever at the rear end of the center pedestal)
@@balintmatrai6702 thank you for the clarification, i'm no expert when it comes to Airbus planes so it's always nice to hear explanations. (also I meant "supply electric power" instead of "the hydraulic pump", not as nearly the same thing)
A reason that you made the landing was that you were taking off and climbing in to/ga but first of all it was a flex take off and in sop you use cl detent to climb and that gave uou some extra speed to come back to laguardia
As a North Carolina native we have the actual plane in a museum
Yes and I saw it 4 years ago
why is it there, not NY?
@@sabinhong0307 Charlotte ist one of US Airways main Hubs
@@sabinhong0307 probably cuz it was heading to Charolette
@SirOof it was actually really cool seeing and plus a survivor was there as well
Interesting fact : Garuda Indonesia Flight 421 actually ditch in Bengawan Solo river on January 16 2002 after both engines flameout in bad weather in fact, that accident is very similar to TACA Flight 110 because both accident flights are the Boeing 737 300 . Play RFS, TFS or Xplane if you guys want to recreate Miracle on the Hudson
It's called "Bengawan Solo river".
@@lecusz_2168 yes i know because i am from Indonesia🇲🇨
garuda indonesia and sq my fav airlines
@@nurrizadjatmiko21 Same, I'm Indonesian.
Im indonesian as well
one thing you did get wrong swiss is that they lost their engines at around 3000 feet, and not 5000 feet. This means also that they were way lower and losing altitude after reaching 3000 feet. So they really couldn't have made it back
They could have actually made it if they turned back immediately after striking the birds, but by the time it took Sully and Jeffery to comprehend what had happened and run through checklists it was too late to try to make it back
@@aviationdude1 they only could have made it after 17 practice attempts like the simulation pilot :)
@@MohamedSaad-ir5lj, true. 17 simulator attempts failed. So, Sully's theory is 100%.
@@aviationdude1 that's an unrealistic expectation
Sorry to be a nerd but it was 2118 I believe 👍👍
Swiss: I tried Landing In The Hudson
Me: I'm Tired To Land In The Hudson
I’ ve never seen that much truth on a simple word
lol
I landed on the terminal in ptfs on my macbook
@@erickaperez6770 this isnt a roblox channel how they gonna know what ptfs means
@@andra_syawwal idc
I recreated the trailer of the movie in 3 different simulators, geofs, RFS and infinite flight, geofs being the best because of the 3.0 water physics
Have you recorded those landings?
Can I have the video links?
yes, geofs works the best in this situation
@@lovelycall haven’t got them on yt and I only recorded the clips for infinite flight and RFS but I can’t already tell it’s not as good Geofs
“Water landing. It wasn’t a crash.”
“Sully” is probably one of the best films I’ve ever seen (beside Bohemian Rhapsody)
The bird strike happened at around 2800 feet, to be specific 2818 feet then they leveled off at 3000…the bird strike didn’t happen at 4500
Yeah thats one thing Nick AKA Swiss got wrong
They didn't level off specifically at 3000, the aircraft continued to climb up to 3200 at 180 knots or so.
@@gaztastic if they had kept the climb then they would’ve stalled
@@aviationgaming1564 There is a system on the airbus that automatically will push the nose down in a stall/near-stall.
@@gaztastic oh I know that but in an emergency it is procedure for the captain to take control of the plane or the first officer if the captain is incapacitated
Ahh yes, 9 minutes of Swiss being confused between January and December
😂 ja that's pretty entertaining
2:42 Sully: report Mayday
Travor Jackob: request Mayday
Fact: A couple days ago we are all remembering Air Florida Flight 90. A 737-200 flying from Washington DCA to Fort Lauderdale that had ice on the wings and crashed in the Potomac River, killing almost everyone, and only 3 survived. People on the bridge actually jumped into the water to help save people, none of the people from the bridge died in the water.
So tragic. Could have been prevented - CRM!
bruh'
Yep. Pulled up and started to stall after take off and smash onto the bridge causing it to break apart and fall into the freezing Potomac.
Swiss001: It's the 15th of December
Swiss001's Editors: JANUARY
Swiss001 again: It's the 15th of December
Everyone Else: january bro
Trevor Jacob’s power is so much the whole aviation community keeps talking about crashes
Man I’m loving these thumbnails, no edits, just the odd titles and Swiss001s hilarious facial expressions!
0:38 got me laughing😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Swiss001 : I'm a better pilot fr this challenge
Sully : Come in my place u.....
Swiss : Butter sully...... Butter
8:34 Ryanair be like:
the way he said it was a mission made me think “new mission unlocked, fly an Airbus A320 into the hudson +2500 cash” lol
0:37 bird! Open up!
Not only the lives on board, below is the most densely populated place in America. He did what he had to do and it worked for the best.
Swiss001 when he lands. SUPPPPRA BUTTER.
2:41 i laughed to Death 💀 😂🤣🤣
Same lol. Everyone knows that if an engine failure happens you just ditch the aircraft. It’s in the checklist of all flights with engine failures.
Like Air France 447 the pilots just jumped without jumping and just let the plane crash just like the checklist.
swiss001: plane crash
youtube subtitles : plain clash
“Kinda like Christmas but with plane crash”
🤣🤣wtf
NETFLIX SULLY🔥🔥💯💯💯
The bird was so funny 🤣 😂 😆
As most other people are stating, the real flight lost the engines at around 3000 feet. (This simulator recreation was wrong because of the person who made it) Another issue with this is MSFS itself. In the sim, it is not only the wrong plane, A320 NEO instead of the older CEO... in the sim the A320 neo has always been somewhat overpowered, along with the fact that it is already slightly more powerful than the older CEO in the first place, MSFS in unrealistic in the speed of the a320. With that info, the entire "recreation" in MSFS is completely wrong; you can only get back to the airport because the bird strike happened way higher than it did in real life (1) and (2) the A320 neo in MSFS is more powerful than the real NEO irl, AND to add on to that; even the real life NEO is already more powerful than the A320 that actually landed in the hudson, making it so you had much more speed and height in the sim. This is why you were able to go back to the airport, instead of having to go into the hudson.
7:30 my favrouite song ( stay)
LOL that “tutorial” really made me laugh. Almost waking the family that are sleeping up.
5:27 I will say this many times if you were at 2,800 hit birds and losing attitude you will not make it to any airport
Fun fact: I was born on January 16th, the day after the plane landed on the Hudson.
Oooo
hi avia
And I was born 11 days later (jan 27)
oh lol
Happy birthday btw
ON THE HUDSON!!!
That “ welcome back to the channel “ has been growing on me.
"It was not a crash, it was a controlled water landing."
Swiss: “What’s that, north carolina?”
The North Carolinians: “sUrE iS, YALL”
i live in North Carolina.
Them: Charlotte has no culture!
Me trying to make Charlotte relevant: "bUt wE GoT tHaT oNe pLaNe In A mUsEaM!"
😂😂😂
Keep up the good work swiss
Love your vids swiss
Nobody:
Swiss: let’s recreate Sully
Sully is one of my favorite movies ever
Maybe sullenberger hated LaGuardia so much he decided the Hudson was a better option
it's really cool to see a youtube channel you used to watch
for a long time, and it continues to grow and
gaining many subscribers, but it's not just because you watch your
videos that he goes to your house and says: -thx! and back.
it's pretty cool to have a yt channel that you like to watch, SERIOUSLY I'll turn
nights I just watch video sometimes, but at the same time it's fuck
realize that you are just a viewer that you will never be noticed by
channel owner, who is busy and doesn't see your comment because the box
input is full, and that's why there are HATERS they are
they talk bad about you so that you notice them, but even so I watch a lot
this channel and I hope it continues to grow, OBVIOUSLY, this is only going to be a
useless comment in the midst of millions where not even the owner will notice, but that's it
congratulations swiss001
*Sully would be proud*
heyyy!! I'm earlyyy! Btw your channel is wonderful and entertaining! :)
love your content mate great video.
Imaging your just at the edge of that river and see that and your just like "oh well that's a cool new boat"
Who ever sees this comment I hope your having a great day
i randomly started watching your channel again after a year.
0:37😂😂😂
Day 100 of asking Swiss to fly to Chicago Executive (my home airport) in a 747-8 at midnight with gusty winds
But you have only 36 comments in this channel? BS
@Plantain Bread Its BS
@@AmauryChihuahua hold up, you hacker or something? Only swiss can see how many comments i left.
@@chicagocarsandcoffee In mobile when you click a youtube channel in a comment section you can see how many comments he has in the channel
Miracle on the hudson
Hi swiss👋 are you going to switch from mfs2020 to xplane 12 (for your videos) when it releases?
I love your videos
Successful landing 😄😭👍
The APU was used in the actual landing so you could have used that instead of the RAT
Rat is super cool tho
But the RAT can't deploy the gear
@@afffe4444 I mean it can, the ram air turbine is supposed to supply the hydraulic pump
@@roxout5743 the RAT supplies the blue hydraulic system and not the green and yellow ( blue is a sort of back up system in normal operation it is powered by an electric pump and in emergency by the RAT, the yellow system is powered by engine no 2 in the air or by the green system through the PTU. Same goes for the green system(only it is powered by engine no1)) so the thing is the green and yellow systems are connected by the PTU (no liquid transfer tho) but the blue is a completely independent system. And long story short the landing gear is supplied by the green system so even if the RAT came out they could not have lowered the landing gear hydraulically… but they could have used the gravity extender (red lever at the rear end of the center pedestal)
@@balintmatrai6702 thank you for the clarification, i'm no expert when it comes to Airbus planes so it's always nice to hear explanations. (also I meant "supply electric power" instead of "the hydraulic pump", not as nearly the same thing)
I was just doing that on Microsoft flight simulator on my Xbox When this notification popped up!
You should do an Emirates review (The Airline is Amazing) And Pls pick the a380
0:34
there's still some differences:
you knew what to do but the crew in the accident didnt.
that was actually an extreme condition.
Fun fact: the bridge that you attempted to land on at the end is the George Washington Bridge, which is the busiest bridge in the world
haha...hhahaha...hahahahaha...haha.ha. Very funny swiss
Keep it up
It's time for you to get some liveries for that A320neo lol
Swiss001 became Sully001
January 15 2009 is my Birthday and it actually feels weird Like knowing a thing Like this happend in your birthday
Prediction: Swiss gonna do a vid about Track IR
Source: trust me bro
Love your vids
Lol, thats funny, i have the same add-on!
0:49 💀plane crash💀
you tried, Swiss, you tried...
0:35-0:40 you made me laugh
Ha ha ohhhh burnnnn 🔥 "Such a ghetto place!" Wheres all the NY fans or residents lol😮😮😮😮
They were very lucky 🍀
0:001 NEO
Correct title: I Remade The Hudson River Miracle
Nobody: There’s no smooth landings on this river
Swiss001: That was butter
at this point, it's a tradition
great job :)
Try bird strike at 3100 feet not climb anymore, then try to head back to La Guardia sully had less altitude then you have here if im correct.
Gutes Video
A reason that you made the landing was that you were taking off and climbing in to/ga but first of all it was a flex take off and in sop you use cl detent to climb and that gave uou some extra speed to come back to laguardia
Yes
Hey swiss can you make a vid how to butter I really have trouble whith that I use geofs and a logitech yoke
Captions: We will just have a debt engine failure Me: Welp guess US Airways is in debt.
I mean... not wrong, in a way. They are extinct as an airline now. Absorbed into American Airlines.
@@coreymcdonald7745 Well it was not like that in 2010 did captions plane the future?!
@@carroblox651 2010? This video is only 4 months old.
Nice video
“Plane cash”- Swiss 001
Hi love the videos
Great video and thanks
I'm curious...how did they eventually get the plane out of the Hudson?
They dont i think
@@christianofabregas3171 They did. It's in a museum in Charlotte.
Probably an amphibian crane 😂🤣
The belly landing reminds me of lot airways b767 belly landing at warsaw,poland
Nice!
Hudson river : I am only river plane has landed
Bengawan river : same
Hudson river : oh
0:46 "plane cash"
Whats that north carolina?
MrBeast: Yea I Live Here
Can we just realize that like five hours ago Swiss001 just ended his stream because he crashed :/
Is it only on Microsoft flight simulator 2020?
15 of December 🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂
When you said that we should watch the movie, I legit went on prime video and bought it. I watched it, IT WAS SO GOOD
Lol funny video
That big brid would wipe both of sully's engines off clean. At least the plane would still glide.
Nice swiss
when he started talking about timing he actually stole some lines from the Sully movie XD
0:20 I don't need to know because I know everything about the movie and the incident