I recently started to watch the videos you do. I must tell you how much it has helped me already in my studying. Especially Hebrew Ch 6. I have never thought about the maturity/ dealing with the Old Testament vs the New Testament. (Covenants) thank you and may God bless you.
Thanks Jason for your teaching brother. We need more people like you willing to teach, as there are many including my self at one time, that just read the bible and that was that. You are showing us how to read the bible and to think not just run through it. This is so important as revelation comes with those who are dedicated and serious about the holy father's holy words. All bibles no matter the type give a certain clarity and the overall message is delivered. This comes clear if you pray and ask God for understanding and wisdom and knowledge in the holy word before reading. God's word is eternal. Keep up the awesome work brother..
This makes sense. I like your conclusions. I used to have a bible many years ago that gave a history of each chapter. I regret so much that I threw it out when it started falling apart. Having that history helps so much as well to better understand each chapter.
I appreciate the way you break things down. I lie how you said seeking understanding is required on OUR part. Seeking wisdom comes with a bit of work, which sometimes we don't like to do. Thank you. I will be watching more videos
12:13 This is a good question, who is this letter addressed to? I like the point where you said this could not be pertaining to the Gospel of Christ but rather the old covenant of the Torah which Christ fulfilled. What confuses me is the similarity of the ‘Elementary teachings’ and the Good News of Jesus the Messiah. That is being repenting, faith and resurrection- in order to be saved one must repent, and believe in the Resurrection of Jesus. I can see how people get it twisted and say that the teachings of the past should be ignored and not preached but they are what leads to Christ.
"Not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works" The phrase “dead works” could refer to: • Works performed in the flesh, without faith. • Ritualistic actions devoid of a heart connection with God. This view ties this to the idea of religious systems that enforce these "dead works" as necessary for salvation or spiritual progress. Instead, true growth comes from a relationship with God, not adherence to empty traditions.
I never made that connectikn brfore. It makes total sense considering the audience it was meant for. I did always assume it was the immature Christian vs mature. Thank you so much for this teaching! I will be studying this more!
Thank you for the great video and platform to discuss and I will try to watch the full video. I believe that the maturity and solid food refers to spiritual growth in relationship to God the Father, being able to be in the spirit and having understanding of the spiritual world, God is Spirit after all we are to worship Him in spirit and in truth.. This hope we have as an anchor of the soul, both sure and steadfast, and which enters the Presence behind the veil, where the forerunner has entered for us, even Jesus, having become High Priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek. Hebrews 6:19-20 NKJV
This is the only acceptable works and it is not taught in the false religious system. Joh 14:12 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father. Luk 4:18 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised, Luk 4:19 To preach the acceptable year of the Lord.
"Leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ" This could indeed be seen as an encouragement to move past the external, surface-level practices often associated with religious systems that lack true spiritual depth. False doctrines, such as those focused on achieving righteousness solely through human effort, distract from the transformative power of grace through faith in Christ.
I am hearing in the future a hispanic was going to be a President of USA in the Future I believe you have it in you being so great in helping Jesus Christ Kingdom.
I very much enjoyed this, but I’m not sure I agree in all the points. I’m not sure that the six elements that are identified in verses 1-3 are particularly talking about Judaism, as opposed to Christianity. In other words, I’m not sure that this is a warning to Israelites who have yet to go beyond elementary teachings of the Mosaic law into the Gospel and Christianity. 1) Chapter 5 is clearly dealing with Jesus, not just the Christ in general terms. Verse 7 specifically refers to part of Jesus’ story. Therefore, the intended audience would be familiar with the gospels and the stories they told. 2) The KJV (which I grew up on) doesn’t use the word “washings” but “baptisms.” There really were no “baptisms” in the OT law. But various baptisms are referred to frequently in the NT, from John’s baptism to Christian baptism to baptism of the Holy Spirit and even the baptism in fire. Though “washings” of various sorts certainly existed in the Mosaic law, I don’t see them as foundational to the law in the same way that baptism is in the new covenant. 3) Was resurrection of the dead really all that foundational to OT Judaism? The Sadducees certainly didn’t think so. It seemed to be a contentious issue with Judaism rather than an elementary principle. But it is clearly an elementary and foundational principle of the Gospel. 4) The reference to “crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh” in verse 6 indicates that the intended audience already knew and believed that the Christ (the Son of God) had been crucified. That would indicate that the audience was already Christian, not Jews who had not yet believed in Jesus. But this is a difficult passage. It doesn’t wholly fit into many theological perspectives.
The elementary word of God is what God said on Mount Sinai,, the ten commandments,,, and from there going on to rest of the commandments and judgements and statues of God, leading to perfection.
I'm reminded of Luke 13:6-9, The Parable of the Barren Fig Tree. This parable from Jesus Christ seems to fit the same mold of what Paul was trying to communicate. Those who have had the milk - who are the ground that drinks the rain & are fertilized, but do not produce useful vegetation (bear fruit). I'm inclined to believe that Hebrews 6:4-6 is speaking about those who are given the Word, maybe even experience regret/contrition from their sins, & even believe on a surface level. BUT, they don't grow from there (produce fruit) & they quickly fall back into wickedness (sin) without any regret. Without much of a second thought. Lovers of iniquity. They refuse the solid food & eventually walk away.
God permitting….We have to keep in mind that repentance must be granted by The Father. We’ve all been given specific lifespans to come to the lord or simply stay lost in sin. So him permitting depends on the condition of our hearts and to come to him in the time that he has purposed.
God has plans for us since before we were formed in our mothers wombs. Not everyone is going to be ready for those plans after they get saved. Gods going to build up our character, strengthen us, give us His wisdom and discernment. So say if Gods plans were to grant a believer millions of dollars all to glorify the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit ,He is not going to give you that money until ur ready for it.
All the way back in the beginning of Hebrews, the authors established a parallel between the Hebrews of his and the Mosaic Hebrews. The Mosaic Hebrews saws God’s miracles, tasted His provision, went through the Red Sea as a picture of baptism, heard the word, and they professes faith. What was the result? Most still have EVIL HEARTS OF UNBELIEF, and their KNOWLEDGE WAS NOT UNITED WITH FAITH. These people did not lose their salvation or rewards in heaven, they were NEVER SAVED. What does God have to ALLOW? He guarantees/predestines SANCTIFICATION, so this is not something that MIGHT happen to the saved. What He has complete control over is WHO IS SAVED. He SEEKS humble and contrite hearts, and He JUDGES the HEART. Your words and rituals do not save you of force God to save you. Just like the Mosaic Hebrews, those in Hebrews 6 and 10, the saw, experienced, tasted, professed BUT were NOT SAVED.
False teaching will never do what this young man does, and slowly examine every detail to first develop a local understanding, and then compare that to the rest of scripture for contradiction. Instead, false teaching always ignore details to avoid complete context, picks out specific details that fit the system, leave the passage to connect them to the system, and then take all that back to the original text to re-engineer the ignored details.
@@bigpigslapperoinktoo4953 Are you an atheist bashing all scripture? Are you a believer bashing Paul’s writings, or making the case that we can’t compare and interpret scripture without Apostolic authority?
Excellent.. the legalist will always jump to “ a believer can lose their salvation “ which is impossible.. this kind of careful study is excellent… however the most effective is to find a teacher who does exegesis… the finding the exact meaning of words from the original language.. the promise of inerrancy btw only applies to the language that the Holy Spirit used to give us his word…
@@DanielAlvarado-qq1ou no.. it’s not obvious to you of the tons of translations that they don’t say the same things ? God used the incredibly nuanced Greek , precisely because it is so nuanced having shades of meaning.. listen carefully.. shades of meaning that doesn’t even exist in our language! So the question is not what God can do… the question is does meaning and shades of meaning get lost in the translation!? Of course
God is faithful in that any good teacher of the Bible does “ exegesis “ which is going to the original languages.. plus we have the Holy Spirit to guide us.
@@Vofact God is more than capable of preserving His word in any language otherwise the Gospel wouldn’t be for all of humanity. I just don’t think you thought this through. Just because there’s a lot of bad English translations does not rule out that God didn’t preserve His Word in English. I’ve come to the conclusion that’s the King James for us based on my research and guidance of the Holy Spirit. You put God in a box by saying He can’t preserve His Word in English. To think He made it so that we need a human teacher to exegete everything for us, I think, is a wild belief.
@@DanielAlvarado-qq1ou I hear you in principle brother. To be clear the main essential issues of the gospel and salvation yes .. an eight year old can see it and those are clear in many “ translations “ it’s the deeper nuggets etc.. why do you think there are so many “ controversial “ passages ? My simple point is it takes some scholarship. One proof of what I’m saying would be .. look how many denominations there are.. but sure the essentials “ faith alone in Christ alone, salvation by grace without works, the virgin birth, the resurrection , Christs 2nd coming.. a few others .. yes pretty clearly said ..
Most churches preach repent say you believe and be baptized is all a person needs to do to be saved and get into Heaven that is the elementary and not correct mainstream adds basically only two things to that give them your money use tithing and themselves as God's financial manager title to get people to give them money. And don't have sex with anyone but your spouse. The rest they either tell people to run the world and to hide under their bed. You talk about what God created they claim everything you need is in the Bible so books like Enoch should not be taking into consideration which is kind of funny because while telling you that you only need the Bible they have a million of their own books that they have written to sell you so you can understand God.
I agree. Denying extra-biblical sources will hurt your maturation. We must be discerning in what we read, but for instance the book of Enoch is quoted in the book of Jude. There’s a reason for that, so Christians need to ask themselves what is the reason, and look at those things.
@TheNationOfTexas yes in Bible God says to seek Him God and God is more than the words in the Bible. God created everything so God is in everything. Decrement key know what is of God and what is not. Like a puzzle Bible Guide and outline you go by then take everything thing and arrange the pieces into their proper place. So much false data out there it's hard, especially when you really start seeking the truth Satan throws everything he can in your way to stop you. Satan's minions go into attack mode and lead you to false conclusions. Rambling so will stop. Food for Thought Anyways
Please please use king James bible it has been certified as accurate translation verse 1 and last each have 44 letters, 4 +4=8 4+4=8 and 8+8=16 1+6=7, also put 44 atop 44 you get 3 pairs of 8's horizontally vertically and diagonally, making 16,16,16 making 777m also read Luke 6:27-38, daily until it is seeded in your heart. Also, Jesus was given authority over ALL flesh pay attention to words given and all and he said I want them I was given=All flesh with me.
It's not eternal torment but eonian G 166 strong's judgement. The judgement is forever. Not the torment in judgement forever ... Huge difference. The Greek interlinear says, Hebrews 6:2 "Of the doctrine of baptism and the laying on of hands and of the resurrection of the dead and eternal judgement." The judgment is eternal not the punishment.
All very foundational teachings of the Gospel. Stop sinning, be faithful to God, baptism(washings)[literally the Greek word baptismos], laying on of hands(healing sick, prayer etc...), resurrection, Hellfire. Most of todays "Christianity" would consider someone who believes and follows those foundations is a mature "Christian". But the author of Hebrews says that he expects people to move past that. Really makes you think about the sad immature state of our apostate "Christian" world in these end times. As Paul prophesied would happen in 2 Thessalonians chapter 2.
Anyways churches teach to have Faith in the world instead of teaching people to have Faith in God because they then do not have any real faith in God or Christ
First of all which version of the Bible are you preaching from? If it’s not KJV your message is already flawed. Secondly is the scriptures for you or to you. We are the audience not the Hebrews! Jesus is the WORD!!!
Hi Jason, God bless your effort to teach, I'd like to lovely disagree with you again! The "analogy" idea on the word is laughable, the majority consensus among new testament scholars would disagree, there's nothing in the context that's suggest even remotely, that's maturity is an analogy. They ought to be teachers, unbelievers ought not to be teachers of God words at any point in time. Hebrews 5:12 They are expected to mature in the faith they already. Again Not laying the foundation of repentance from dead works, the word Again means it something that had been already done, that they should not be needing to do Again Hebrews 6:1 If God permit - This is not to be interpreted as if God was "unwilling" that they should make such advances, or as if it were "doubtful" whether he would allow it if they made an honest effort, and their lives were spared; but it is a phrase used to denote their "dependence" on him. Instead, you ought to say, “If the Lord wills, we will live and also do this or that.” James 4:15 but took leave of them and said, “I will return to you again if God wills,” and he set sail from Ephesus. Acts 18:21
That is a false Bible version he is reading there. The verse prior to 6:1 in the false Bible he is reading says that a mature Christian will "practice" to distinguish good from evil. Never (all you have to do to prove this is to look at all the "practice" words in scripture) does the Authorized Bible use "practice" to say what a just person does. Mostly otherwise I like this young man's teaching.
The translation he reads makes me tense as well. As I myself do read from the Greek and Hebrew interlinear. There are also a lot of mistranslations in the KJV as well though. When you start reading the Greek and Hebrew you will start seeing a LOT of flaws. The NKJV has corrected most of them. But there are still some strangely butchered translations in that. The NKJV is the closest I have found to a direct literal translation. I highly suggest you look into it if you desire accuracy. Or even get an interlinear Bible and read/translate yourself using lexicons and concordances.
@@MichaelServantOfChrist I do use Strong's Concordance. But I have never found any discrepancies in the K.J.V.. I realize that Gail Ripplinger has a few problems in her doctrine , but she is a former professor at Kent State U., and had many videos on the corruptions in the new versions, including the N.K.J.V.. She also teaches about how the lexicon and interlinears got corrupted in the last few hundred years. Even the Strong's is not without problems. If you could point out some of so-called errors in the K.J.V., let me know. Mrs. Ripplinger says how the K.J.V. is T.I.P.--translated, inspired, and preserved perfectly as God makes no mistakes and still has His inerrant scriptures so as to not leave Himself without witness.
@@ralphowen3367 No disrespect meant by this. First problem with that statement, before I even get to KJV translation errors. Which I will gladly provide. You do know that females are forbidden to be a public teacher of or about Gods word right? I wrote a whole article about this, going in great detail about the role of women in the Bible, New and Old Covenants. But briefly, 1 Timothy 2:11-15, 1 Corinthians 14:34-38, Isaiah 3:14. Women are to be, Titus 2:3-5, 1 Peter 3:1-6. Remember Gods curse on women after the fall, "I will greatly multiply your sorrow and your conception; In pain you shall bring forth children; Your desire shall be for your husband, And he shall rule over you." A place where both the KJV and NKJV are wrong in the translation btw. That term "your husband" just means man. The your is added in there. The word literally means man. Thus why Paul said, the woman(not wife) must be in submission as the LAW says, 1 Corinthians 14:34. That is just 1 of many. The translation of Hades and Sheol to Hell just like Gehenna. But Hades and Sheol are the holding cell, Gehenna is the lake of fire. 2 totally different places. Like calling county jail and prison the same thing. Similar but not the same, misleading translation. There are many more I would be glad to help point out more if you would like.
@@ralphowen3367 One of them is in Luke 23:43 "And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, Today shalt thou be with me in paradise." In the original greek there were no punctuations so they were supplied by the translators. If we read it how the KJV has it punctuated, we conclude Jesus went to Heaven on the day of His resurrection. However, this contradicts the message He gave to Mary on Sunday morning when He told her not to touch Him for he had not yet ascended to Heaven. One or the other was a false statement based on how it was translated. Now consider a different punctuation of the verse... " And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee today, shalt thou be with me in paradise." As you can see, by moving the comma to after the word today, it now harmonizes with Jesus' statement to Mary.
The KJV says they will have there senses exercised. Exercise is used to gain strength... practice is used to gain proficiency. Both relevant to the Spirit of the verse.
Leaving the principles refers to moving from one stepto to the next step, and not dismissing or abolishing the foundations.
I recently started to watch the videos you do. I must tell you how much it has helped me already in my studying. Especially Hebrew Ch 6. I have never thought about the maturity/ dealing with the Old Testament vs the New Testament. (Covenants) thank you and may God bless you.
Thanks Jason for your teaching brother. We need more people like you willing to teach, as there are many including my self at one time, that just read the bible and that was that. You are showing us how to read the bible and to think not just run through it. This is so important as revelation comes with those who are dedicated and serious about the holy father's holy words. All bibles no matter the type give a certain clarity and the overall message is delivered. This comes clear if you pray and ask God for understanding and wisdom and knowledge in the holy word before reading. God's word is eternal. Keep up the awesome work brother..
This makes sense. I like your conclusions. I used to have a bible many years ago that gave a history of each chapter. I regret so much that I threw it out when it started falling apart. Having that history helps so much as well to better understand each chapter.
Praise the lord brother thank you so much sharing wonderful word of God every day 🙏🙏🙏
Blessings🙌🏾 It’s talking about moving on from “the foundation of” those six things; not the six doctrines themselves.
Yes, much like moving to the next step, and not dismissing or abolishing the foundations.
I appreciate the way you break things down. I lie how you said seeking understanding is required on OUR part. Seeking wisdom comes with a bit of work, which sometimes we don't like to do. Thank you. I will be watching more videos
12:13 This is a good question, who is this letter addressed to? I like the point where you said this could not be pertaining to the Gospel of Christ but rather the old covenant of the Torah which Christ fulfilled. What confuses me is the similarity of the ‘Elementary teachings’ and the Good News of Jesus the Messiah. That is being repenting, faith and resurrection- in order to be saved one must repent, and believe in the Resurrection of Jesus. I can see how people get it twisted and say that the teachings of the past should be ignored and not preached but they are what leads to Christ.
"Not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works"
The phrase “dead works” could refer to:
• Works performed in the flesh, without faith.
• Ritualistic actions devoid of a heart connection with God.
This view ties this to the idea of religious systems that enforce these "dead works" as necessary for salvation or spiritual progress. Instead, true growth comes from a relationship with God, not adherence to empty traditions.
I never made that connectikn brfore. It makes total sense considering the audience it was meant for. I did always assume it was the immature Christian vs mature. Thank you so much for this teaching! I will be studying this more!
Paul was being nice saying they need milk most of the people nowadays need potty training. thank you for sharing this
Have a great weekend
What Bible version are you using?
Thank you for the great video and platform to discuss and I will try to watch the full video. I believe that the maturity and solid food refers to spiritual growth in relationship to God the Father, being able to be in the spirit and having understanding of the spiritual world, God is Spirit after all we are to worship Him in spirit and in truth.. This hope we have as an anchor of the soul, both sure and steadfast, and which enters the Presence behind the veil, where the forerunner has entered for us, even Jesus, having become High Priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek.
Hebrews 6:19-20 NKJV
So good!! Amen! 😊
Thank you brother 🙏
❤❤❤❤❤ amazing
This is the only acceptable works and it is not taught in the false religious system. Joh 14:12 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father.
Luk 4:18 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised,
Luk 4:19 To preach the acceptable year of the Lord.
Thank you ❤
"Leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ"
This could indeed be seen as an encouragement to move past the external, surface-level practices often associated with religious systems that lack true spiritual depth. False doctrines, such as those focused on achieving righteousness solely through human effort, distract from the transformative power of grace through faith in Christ.
Good looking out little brother.
I am hearing in the future a hispanic was going to be a President of USA in the Future I believe you have it in you being so great in helping Jesus Christ Kingdom.
What about verse 4
I very much enjoyed this, but I’m not sure I agree in all the points. I’m not sure that the six elements that are identified in verses 1-3 are particularly talking about Judaism, as opposed to Christianity. In other words, I’m not sure that this is a warning to Israelites who have yet to go beyond elementary teachings of the Mosaic law into the Gospel and Christianity. 1) Chapter 5 is clearly dealing with Jesus, not just the Christ in general terms. Verse 7 specifically refers to part of Jesus’ story. Therefore, the intended audience would be familiar with the gospels and the stories they told. 2) The KJV (which I grew up on) doesn’t use the word “washings” but “baptisms.” There really were no “baptisms” in the OT law. But various baptisms are referred to frequently in the NT, from John’s baptism to Christian baptism to baptism of the Holy Spirit and even the baptism in fire. Though “washings” of various sorts certainly existed in the Mosaic law, I don’t see them as foundational to the law in the same way that baptism is in the new covenant. 3) Was resurrection of the dead really all that foundational to OT Judaism? The Sadducees certainly didn’t think so. It seemed to be a contentious issue with Judaism rather than an elementary principle. But it is clearly an elementary and foundational principle of the Gospel. 4) The reference to “crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh” in verse 6 indicates that the intended audience already knew and believed that the Christ (the Son of God) had been crucified. That would indicate that the audience was already Christian, not Jews who had not yet believed in Jesus. But this is a difficult passage. It doesn’t wholly fit into many theological perspectives.
The elementary word of God is what God said on Mount Sinai,, the ten commandments,,, and from there going on to rest of the commandments and judgements and statues of God, leading to perfection.
I'm reminded of Luke 13:6-9, The Parable of the Barren Fig Tree. This parable from Jesus Christ seems to fit the same mold of what Paul was trying to communicate. Those who have had the milk - who are the ground that drinks the rain & are fertilized, but do not produce useful vegetation (bear fruit). I'm inclined to believe that Hebrews 6:4-6 is speaking about those who are given the Word, maybe even experience regret/contrition from their sins, & even believe on a surface level. BUT, they don't grow from there (produce fruit) & they quickly fall back into wickedness (sin) without any regret. Without much of a second thought. Lovers of iniquity. They refuse the solid food & eventually walk away.
What's the therefore there for
I believe I've always had discernment and I don't like that. I don't want to know if someone is Evil but I guess it's protected me this long 😃
What version of the Bible are you teaching from?
What about Hebrews 6:4-5?
No one has a problem with the way he's marking up the Bible. Would be better if he made copies of the pages he's working with.
God permitting….We have to keep in mind that repentance must be granted by The Father. We’ve all been given specific lifespans to come to the lord or simply stay lost in sin. So him permitting depends on the condition of our hearts and to come to him in the time that he has purposed.
What 😮
Do you mind me asking what denomination you are?
What version of the bible do you use?
God has plans for us since before we were formed in our mothers wombs. Not everyone is going to be ready for those plans after they get saved. Gods going to build up our character, strengthen us, give us His wisdom and discernment. So say if Gods plans were to grant a believer millions of dollars all to glorify the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit ,He is not going to give you that money until ur ready for it.
It's saying to get away from teaching salvation. And go on to prophesy. The testimony of Jesus christ is the spirit of prophesy.
All the way back in the beginning of Hebrews, the authors established a parallel between the Hebrews of his and the Mosaic Hebrews. The Mosaic Hebrews saws God’s miracles, tasted His provision, went through the Red Sea as a picture of baptism, heard the word, and they professes faith. What was the result? Most still have EVIL HEARTS OF UNBELIEF, and their KNOWLEDGE WAS NOT UNITED WITH FAITH. These people did not lose their salvation or rewards in heaven, they were NEVER SAVED.
What does God have to ALLOW? He guarantees/predestines SANCTIFICATION, so this is not something that MIGHT happen to the saved. What He has complete control over is WHO IS SAVED. He SEEKS humble and contrite hearts, and He JUDGES the HEART. Your words and rituals do not save you of force God to save you.
Just like the Mosaic Hebrews, those in Hebrews 6 and 10, the saw, experienced, tasted, professed BUT were NOT SAVED.
Exactly!
False teaching will never do what this young man does, and slowly examine every detail to first develop a local understanding, and then compare that to the rest of scripture for contradiction. Instead, false teaching always ignore details to avoid complete context, picks out specific details that fit the system, leave the passage to connect them to the system, and then take all that back to the original text to re-engineer the ignored details.
@@bigpigslapperoinktoo4953 Are you an atheist bashing all scripture? Are you a believer bashing Paul’s writings, or making the case that we can’t compare and interpret scripture without Apostolic authority?
Good synopsis.
@@jeffreybombaExactly!!
If you don't trust that he is reading out of the correct Bible find your own and read it yourself I read the King James Bible
Excellent.. the legalist will always jump to “ a believer can lose their salvation “ which is impossible.. this kind of careful study is excellent… however the most effective is to find a teacher who does exegesis… the finding the exact meaning of words from the original language.. the promise of inerrancy btw only applies to the language that the Holy Spirit used to give us his word…
So you don’t think God can preserve His Word in the English language?
@@DanielAlvarado-qq1ou no.. it’s not obvious to you of the tons of translations that they don’t say the same things ? God used the incredibly nuanced Greek , precisely because it is so nuanced having shades of meaning.. listen carefully.. shades of meaning that doesn’t even exist in our language! So the question is not what God can do… the question is does meaning and shades of meaning get lost in the translation!? Of course
God is faithful in that any good teacher of the Bible does “ exegesis “ which is going to the original languages.. plus we have the Holy Spirit to guide us.
@@Vofact God is more than capable of preserving His word in any language otherwise the Gospel wouldn’t be for all of humanity. I just don’t think you thought this through. Just because there’s a lot of bad English translations does not rule out that God didn’t preserve His Word in English. I’ve come to the conclusion that’s the King James for us based on my research and guidance of the Holy Spirit. You put God in a box by saying He can’t preserve His Word in English. To think He made it so that we need a human teacher to exegete everything for us, I think, is a wild belief.
@@DanielAlvarado-qq1ou I hear you in principle brother. To be clear the main essential issues of the gospel and salvation yes .. an eight year old can see it and those are clear in many “ translations “ it’s the deeper nuggets etc.. why do you think there are so many “ controversial “ passages ? My simple point is it takes some scholarship. One proof of what I’m saying would be .. look how many denominations there are.. but sure the essentials “ faith alone in Christ alone, salvation by grace without works, the virgin birth, the resurrection , Christs 2nd coming.. a few others .. yes pretty clearly said ..
Most churches preach repent say you believe and be baptized is all a person needs to do to be saved and get into Heaven that is the elementary and not correct mainstream adds basically only two things to that give them your money use tithing and themselves as God's financial manager title to get people to give them money. And don't have sex with anyone but your spouse. The rest they either tell people to run the world and to hide under their bed. You talk about what God created they claim everything you need is in the Bible so books like Enoch should not be taking into consideration which is kind of funny because while telling you that you only need the Bible they have a million of their own books that they have written to sell you so you can understand God.
I agree. Denying extra-biblical sources will hurt your maturation. We must be discerning in what we read, but for instance the book of Enoch is quoted in the book of Jude. There’s a reason for that, so Christians need to ask themselves what is the reason, and look at those things.
@TheNationOfTexas yes in Bible God says to seek Him God and God is more than the words in the Bible. God created everything so God is in everything. Decrement key know what is of God and what is not. Like a puzzle Bible Guide and outline you go by then take everything thing and arrange the pieces into their proper place. So much false data out there it's hard, especially when you really start seeking the truth Satan throws everything he can in your way to stop you. Satan's minions go into attack mode and lead you to false conclusions. Rambling so will stop. Food for Thought Anyways
Please please use king James bible it has been certified as accurate translation verse 1 and last each have 44 letters, 4 +4=8 4+4=8 and 8+8=16 1+6=7, also put 44 atop 44 you get 3 pairs of 8's horizontally vertically and diagonally, making 16,16,16 making 777m also read Luke 6:27-38, daily until it is seeded in your heart. Also, Jesus was given authority over ALL flesh pay attention to words given and all and he said I want them I was given=All flesh with me.
NASB has been tested and proven to be most accurate.
It's not eternal torment but eonian G 166 strong's judgement.
The judgement is forever. Not the torment in judgement forever ... Huge difference.
The Greek interlinear says, Hebrews 6:2 "Of the doctrine of baptism and the laying on of hands and of the resurrection of the dead and eternal judgement."
The judgment is eternal not the punishment.
All very foundational teachings of the Gospel. Stop sinning, be faithful to God, baptism(washings)[literally the Greek word baptismos], laying on of hands(healing sick, prayer etc...), resurrection, Hellfire.
Most of todays "Christianity" would consider someone who believes and follows those foundations is a mature "Christian". But the author of Hebrews says that he expects people to move past that.
Really makes you think about the sad immature state of our apostate "Christian" world in these end times. As Paul prophesied would happen in 2 Thessalonians chapter 2.
Very True
Anyways churches teach to have Faith in the world instead of teaching people to have Faith in God because they then do not have any real faith in God or Christ
First of all which version of the Bible are you preaching from? If it’s not KJV your message is already flawed. Secondly is the scriptures for you or to you. We are the audience not the Hebrews! Jesus is the WORD!!!
Hi Jason, God bless your effort to teach, I'd like to lovely disagree with you again!
The "analogy" idea on the word is laughable, the majority consensus among new testament scholars would disagree, there's nothing in the context that's suggest even remotely, that's maturity is an analogy.
They ought to be teachers, unbelievers ought not to be teachers of God words at any point in time.
Hebrews 5:12
They are expected to mature in the faith they already. Again Not laying the foundation of repentance from dead works, the word Again means it something that had been already done, that they should not be needing to do Again
Hebrews 6:1
If God permit - This is not to be interpreted as if God was "unwilling" that they should make such advances, or as if it were "doubtful" whether he would allow it if they made an honest effort, and their lives were spared; but it is a phrase used to denote their "dependence" on him.
Instead, you ought to say, “If the Lord wills, we will live and also do this or that.”
James 4:15
but took leave of them and said, “I will return to you again if God wills,” and he set sail from Ephesus.
Acts 18:21
It is saying what most christians think. That's why we think it. No mystery here. We must have a right heart and endure to the end.
But isn't Jesus the only one who ever did that?
The Pope assembled the Bible 💫
Which pope please?
@@madeleinedjimisindecoly3793 , not Peter the Roman.
What are your sources for this claim?
@@AboveReproachMinistry , history/reality.
Nobody asked you though
That is a false Bible version he is reading there. The verse prior to 6:1 in the false Bible he is reading says that a mature Christian will "practice" to distinguish good from evil. Never (all you have to do to prove this is to look at all the "practice" words in scripture) does the Authorized Bible use "practice" to say what a just person does. Mostly otherwise I like this young man's teaching.
The translation he reads makes me tense as well. As I myself do read from the Greek and Hebrew interlinear. There are also a lot of mistranslations in the KJV as well though. When you start reading the Greek and Hebrew you will start seeing a LOT of flaws.
The NKJV has corrected most of them. But there are still some strangely butchered translations in that. The NKJV is the closest I have found to a direct literal translation.
I highly suggest you look into it if you desire accuracy. Or even get an interlinear Bible and read/translate yourself using lexicons and concordances.
@@MichaelServantOfChrist I do use Strong's Concordance. But I have never found any discrepancies in the K.J.V.. I realize that Gail Ripplinger has a few problems in her doctrine , but she is a former professor at Kent State U., and had many videos on the corruptions in the new versions, including the N.K.J.V.. She also teaches about how the lexicon and interlinears got corrupted in the last few hundred years. Even the Strong's is not without problems. If you could point out some of so-called errors in the K.J.V., let me know. Mrs. Ripplinger says how the K.J.V. is T.I.P.--translated, inspired, and preserved perfectly as God makes no mistakes and still has His inerrant scriptures so as to not leave Himself without witness.
@@ralphowen3367 No disrespect meant by this. First problem with that statement, before I even get to KJV translation errors. Which I will gladly provide. You do know that females are forbidden to be a public teacher of or about Gods word right?
I wrote a whole article about this, going in great detail about the role of women in the Bible, New and Old Covenants. But briefly, 1 Timothy 2:11-15, 1 Corinthians 14:34-38, Isaiah 3:14. Women are to be, Titus 2:3-5, 1 Peter 3:1-6. Remember Gods curse on women after the fall,
"I will greatly multiply your sorrow and your conception;
In pain you shall bring forth children;
Your desire shall be for your husband,
And he shall rule over you."
A place where both the KJV and NKJV are wrong in the translation btw. That term "your husband" just means man. The your is added in there. The word literally means man. Thus why Paul said, the woman(not wife) must be in submission as the LAW says, 1 Corinthians 14:34.
That is just 1 of many. The translation of Hades and Sheol to Hell just like Gehenna. But Hades and Sheol are the holding cell, Gehenna is the lake of fire. 2 totally different places. Like calling county jail and prison the same thing. Similar but not the same, misleading translation. There are many more I would be glad to help point out more if you would like.
@@ralphowen3367 One of them is in Luke 23:43
"And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, Today shalt thou be with me in paradise."
In the original greek there were no punctuations so they were supplied by the translators. If we read it how the KJV has it punctuated, we conclude Jesus went to Heaven on the day of His resurrection. However, this contradicts the message He gave to Mary on Sunday morning when He told her not to touch Him for he had not yet ascended to Heaven.
One or the other was a false statement based on how it was translated. Now consider a different punctuation of the verse...
" And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee today, shalt thou be with me in paradise."
As you can see, by moving the comma to after the word today, it now harmonizes with Jesus' statement to Mary.
The KJV says they will have there senses exercised. Exercise is used to gain strength... practice is used to gain proficiency. Both relevant to the Spirit of the verse.
I gave up after about 8 minutes, you say the same thing 10 different ways! bye!
Thanks brother✝️