Hi, thanks for the video but can you help me with this question? What evidence should a court be allowed to use to determine if parties intended for there to be a contract
Well, for starters, the court will look at the contract - or the document that purports to be the contract. If there is a signed contract that is considerable evidence that the parties intended to form a contract. If I'm not understanding your question properly, please let me know.
Hi LP! I'm not sure but I think you might mean where parties put in the contract a clause stating that the agreement is final, therefore, there is no need for parol evidence. This is often called a merger clause. A merger clause will say something like, "This is the final agreement among the parties etc. etc." The idea is that the parties will exclude any evidence from negotiations or from other agreements to add to or modify the meaning of their contract.
Oh my God! This is the best simplified explanation of this rule❤️ thanks a lot
Great! Thanks so much for the simple way of explaining compicated rules.
Your videos are truly helpful and of excellent educational design.Thanks a million!!!
Very helpful. Thank you 👍🏼
Glad it was helpful! Let me know if other topics interest you.
Thank you for the video! It helped so much!!
Thanks, let me know if other topics interest you. uslawessentials.com/blog
Great as always!
Thanks!
great video can make the other for business law cases
Thanks! What other topics interest you?
Hi, thanks for the video but can you help me with this question?
What evidence should a court be allowed to use to determine if parties intended for there to be a contract
Well, for starters, the court will look at the contract - or the document that purports to be the contract. If there is a signed contract that is considerable evidence that the parties intended to form a contract. If I'm not understanding your question properly, please let me know.
when can a waiver of the parol evidence rule be made?
Hi LP! I'm not sure but I think you might mean where parties put in the contract a clause stating that the agreement is final, therefore, there is no need for parol evidence. This is often called a merger clause. A merger clause will say something like, "This is the final agreement among the parties etc. etc." The idea is that the parties will exclude any evidence from negotiations or from other agreements to add to or modify the meaning of their contract.
Thank you so much 🙂
evidence act chapter 10