Yep. The process has been around since 1967! There are 2 text books, 23 clinical trials and hundreds of other research papers. Can you tell I love doing it? ❤️
When there is joint irritation/fixation, larger muscles kick on to compensate for the lack of stability in the local area, When you challenge an area like that (the arm movements etc.) those larger muscles kick on unconsciously demonstrating variation in leg length, the area's he is checking if showing this phenomenon need addressed so that local stability/normal motion can be achieved. It is a phenomenal system. However, do not think that is 100% of the clinical reasoning for what needs adjusted, clinical presentation, history, and many other factors used congruently are used for the clinical rational to know what to treat and what to leave alone. I hope that helps with a general understanding.
That’s a great question. Simple answer is yes. Get it wrong and it can make things worse. As it is also true for medication doses, drilling teeth, balancing car wheels and financial investments. However, the protocol you can see me using will not only tell me where to adjust, but and arguably more importantly, where not to adjust. It is a skill that takes time to learn and years to master.
@@southstreetchiropractic6693 So would you say that activator is better than manual adjusting because it moves the bone and it has neurological effects because of its speed?
amazing
Thanks
Wow that's totally different
Yep. The process has been around since 1967! There are 2 text books, 23 clinical trials and hundreds of other research papers. Can you tell I love doing it? ❤️
What are you looking for on their feet?
When there is joint irritation/fixation, larger muscles kick on to compensate for the lack of stability in the local area, When you challenge an area like that (the arm movements etc.) those larger muscles kick on unconsciously demonstrating variation in leg length, the area's he is checking if showing this phenomenon need addressed so that local stability/normal motion can be achieved. It is a phenomenal system. However, do not think that is 100% of the clinical reasoning for what needs adjusted, clinical presentation, history, and many other factors used congruently are used for the clinical rational to know what to treat and what to leave alone. I hope that helps with a general understanding.
Is there an adverse effect if you use the device on a place the doesn't need adjusting, or makes no difference?
That’s a great question. Simple answer is yes. Get it wrong and it can make things worse. As it is also true for medication doses, drilling teeth, balancing car wheels and financial investments. However, the protocol you can see me using will not only tell me where to adjust, but and arguably more importantly, where not to adjust. It is a skill that takes time to learn and years to master.
@@southstreetchiropractic6693 So would you say that activator is better than manual adjusting because it moves the bone and it has neurological effects because of its speed?
@@rodrigovelasquez9854
Research shows the Activator can move the bone 1.5 mm, 200x faster than a manual adjustment and with higher precision.
Can I ask why don't you use manual manipulation. Like cracking his back or neck ?
It's a magic jabber