Helpful video ! :-) I can relate to a lot of things you say, especially about your energy and excitement to do new things but in an effort to get things done, finish things... Or how you make your choices by eliminating options. I think I might be like you: organized/ambition driven/perfectionist/over-thinker ENFP. At the moment, my certitude is to be xNFx and enneagram type 4 ( I was wondering if you took some enneagram tests as well?) . I'm not quite sure about the rest! Thanks for sharing, your journey
It's definitely possible! People stereotype ENFPs as carefree and all over the place, but Ne + Te can be incredibly ambitious/achievement-oriented/organized and Si inferior can lead to perfectionistic behaviors. As for the enneagram, I am pretty sure I'm a 4w3
@@kevinexperiences Haha, I think we are alike considering those traits. I first thought I couldn't be ENFP because my ENFPs friends are really chaotic and pure extraverts, I didn't feel at all like that. Your type of ENFP speaks a lot more to me. Thanks :-)
Actually I was pretty sure I was INFJ until an INTJ told me I was using Ne-Si and so was an ENFP. Which I disagree to. But it makes me wonder and think. And I struggle figuring things out. I struggle observing myself with concrete examples. That's really frustrating.
@Adeline C. I am pretty confident I'm an INFJ. Took pretty much most of the available popular typing sites/systems. Most of them typed me as an INFJ. The one that finally sealed it for me was michaelcaloz's. Interestingly, "people" always mistyped me as either INFP, ENFP or ENTP due to my strong use of Ne and my expression. LOL. Just because you constantly use some function doesn't mean it IS your dominant. The thing is, as an INFJ it is hard for me to distinguish between Ne and Ni because I always use both hand-in-hand, something that only true INFJs could relate (if not exclusive to). This is an interesting dilemma for INFJs because using both Ni and Ne comes easy to them. Same reason INFJs find it easier to accept different perspectives. Not even INTJs have the same problem. If I were to actually rank all my cognitive functions regardless of dichotomy (say, Ni vs Ne), this is how it would look like: Ni>Fe>Ne>Ti>Fi>Si>Te>Se You could see that my use of Si is stronger than my actual stacked Se. And it is very evident on my routine: I have multiple digital and bullet journals, always keep multiple EXTERNAL backups (both printed and digital), and one of the distinguishing Si characteristics - very particular in history and timeline. I love to look back on my entry from 10 years ago on the same date/day. I love to keep track of my "frame of mind", on how my interests changed, or not. To anyone who doesn't know me personally, that sounded like someone who is an ISTJ.
Thanks! It really depends on your frame of reference when dealing with the external world, does your cognition pull from your past experiences to imagine future possibilities or does it see an end destination and try to make that materialize in your present concrete experiences? ESFPs are also probably more thrill-seeking (in a physical sense), may lean into risks more and don't care as much about social norms.
@@kevinexperiences Ni also cares about the past and is internal, seeing patterns in the past to predict better. Ne users also hate social norms and any type can like physical things. Ni is internal and subjective and Ne is external and objective.
@@Swampert444 These are just general patterns to look for, but you're right, any type can access any function. The social norms aspect has more to do with temperament than it does with specific functions
@@kevinexperiences Yes, I was just clearly explaining other side of the definitions of the functions that you may have been unaware of, since I've been learning alot more and watching Michael Pierce and Casual Cognition.
![[Live] : ONE 168 วันนี้!! "โจนาธาน vs ซุปเปอร์เล็ก"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0jIN65KgJsI/mqdefault.jpg)
What's your type? And do you have any examples of you using Ni-Se or Ne-Si? Let me know below!
ENFP. I relate to a lot of your examples and agree they sound ENFP.
@@klp3309 Glad you found it relatable and appreciate the feedback
Helpful video ! :-) I can relate to a lot of things you say, especially about your energy and excitement to do new things but in an effort to get things done, finish things... Or how you make your choices by eliminating options. I think I might be like you: organized/ambition driven/perfectionist/over-thinker ENFP. At the moment, my certitude is to be xNFx and enneagram type 4 ( I was wondering if you took some enneagram tests as well?) . I'm not quite sure about the rest! Thanks for sharing, your journey
It's definitely possible! People stereotype ENFPs as carefree and all over the place, but Ne + Te can be incredibly ambitious/achievement-oriented/organized and Si inferior can lead to perfectionistic behaviors. As for the enneagram, I am pretty sure I'm a 4w3
@@kevinexperiences Haha, I think we are alike considering those traits. I first thought I couldn't be ENFP because my ENFPs friends are really chaotic and pure extraverts, I didn't feel at all like that. Your type of ENFP speaks a lot more to me. Thanks :-)
@@MrsLauraRose Awesome! There's definitely a spectrum of ENFPs, ENFPs can come across as quite introverted
I almost always get INFP as a result. I wonder if I may be either an ENFP or ISFP.
Actually I was pretty sure I was INFJ until an INTJ told me I was using Ne-Si and so was an ENFP. Which I disagree to. But it makes me wonder and think. And I struggle figuring things out. I struggle observing myself with concrete examples. That's really frustrating.
Typing yourself can be challenging. Since this video, I got professionally typed as an ESFP so even I was off by a letter
@Adeline C.
I am pretty confident I'm an INFJ. Took pretty much most of the available popular typing sites/systems. Most of them typed me as an INFJ. The one that finally sealed it for me was michaelcaloz's.
Interestingly, "people" always mistyped me as either INFP, ENFP or ENTP due to my strong use of Ne and my expression. LOL. Just because you constantly use some function doesn't mean it IS your dominant. The thing is, as an INFJ it is hard for me to distinguish between Ne and Ni because I always use both hand-in-hand, something that only true INFJs could relate (if not exclusive to). This is an interesting dilemma for INFJs because using both Ni and Ne comes easy to them. Same reason INFJs find it easier to accept different perspectives. Not even INTJs have the same problem.
If I were to actually rank all my cognitive functions regardless of dichotomy (say, Ni vs Ne), this is how it would look like:
Ni>Fe>Ne>Ti>Fi>Si>Te>Se
You could see that my use of Si is stronger than my actual stacked Se. And it is very evident on my routine: I have multiple digital and bullet journals, always keep multiple EXTERNAL backups (both printed and digital), and one of the distinguishing Si characteristics - very particular in history and timeline. I love to look back on my entry from 10 years ago on the same date/day. I love to keep track of my "frame of mind", on how my interests changed, or not. To anyone who doesn't know me personally, that sounded like someone who is an ISTJ.
Nice video! I’m an ENFP wondering if I’m that or just a mistyped ESFP 😅
Thanks! It really depends on your frame of reference when dealing with the external world, does your cognition pull from your past experiences to imagine future possibilities or does it see an end destination and try to make that materialize in your present concrete experiences? ESFPs are also probably more thrill-seeking (in a physical sense), may lean into risks more and don't care as much about social norms.
@@kevinexperiences Ni also cares about the past and is internal, seeing patterns in the past to predict better. Ne users also hate social norms and any type can like physical things. Ni is internal and subjective and Ne is external and objective.
@@Swampert444 These are just general patterns to look for, but you're right, any type can access any function. The social norms aspect has more to do with temperament than it does with specific functions
@@kevinexperiences Yes, I was just clearly explaining other side of the definitions of the functions that you may have been unaware of, since I've been learning alot more and watching Michael Pierce and Casual Cognition.