Is frequency and CPM a waste of time
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ก.ค. 2024
- In todays video I discuss is the frequency and the CPM of a shaft a waste of time.
For more information head to - sydneygolftech.com.au
Follow SGT on instagram - sydneygolft...
Follow SGT on Facebook - / sydneygolftech - กีฬา
Eye opening. Appreciate you speaking out frankly but fairly on the subject. Cheers!
Thanks for sharing your knowledge Greg.
Love the work during this tough time mate👏👏
With the stuff u were explaining about,it sounds like it’s outdated and what may have been “the way to do things then” is certainly not the way to do things now
Definitely worth a trip to get a set fitted especially with this knowledge behind the build
Thanks very much. Let me know if you would like to come and visit.
Well this video was timely. And what an eye opener when you compared the Ventus range. I've seen club makers build parallel tip shafts and trimming them to length using frequency. It was PX 6.0 and the customer wanted x amount of cycles between each club. Is that also a big wank and should they have just stuck to the trimming instructions and not used frequency? Great video. This is stuff others aren't talking about.
The whole premise of PX shafts is that they are frequency matched. Fancy machines do not equate to facts. Frequency machines measure the butt stiffness. Not overall stiffness.
It goes side to side for one. 2 every shaft has a stiffer side. So I do it and make it where it flows as straight as possible.
Quality graphite shafts have up to 20 layers that are wrapped around a steel mandrel. That process makes it very difficult to have a stiffer side. Do you have any actual evidence that the process helps with performance? Nobody does.
@@SydneyGolfTech haven’t seen a single video from anyone on YT on frequency matching, puring, FLOing or whatever that presents any data whatsoever to support conclusions.
@@sjgsteve21 I’m in the same boat. Just waiting for some actual evidence. Maybe one day somebody will come up with a conclusive study on it.
I have had two sets of frequency matched clubs and my 9i feels just like my 4i when I hit them. The ball flights are really consistent. The height on my 7i looks just like I hit my 8i. The heads have different weights. Lighter in the long irons. My 5i looks as high in the sky as my 7i. The flex feels the same on the PW and 8i. It comforting to know what to expect in ball flight on every club even before you hit it. My current set is frequency matched in graphite. They are light. The height I get on my 5i is amazing. I'm not sure what you're talking about it being a bad system.
I’m curious, what is your current handicap?
@@SydneyGolfTech I'm a 2.8 handicap. I shoot between 69 and 78. Depending mostly on how I'm putting that day and green speeds.
@@TheMcfreeze I wonder what the cpm of the tips of the shaft are? I’m guessing you have only had the handle cpm tested. I stand by what I have said.
@@SydneyGolfTech I'm not sure. There is a place here in Myrtle Beach, SC called Classic Clubs and they build their own sets called Classic Clubs. I went through different frequencies on the range until I chose the feel and ball flight that I felt was perfect for me and he built them after I hit the 7i, 4i and PW.
@@TheMcfreeze sounds like a great process.