Just finished this debate - you have around 100-150 hours worth of study at least into the rebuttals. Not only did you bunch up and not understand the questions and responses - the questions you where trying to say are very level 1 atheist type arguments that have probably been around for at least 80 years - these have all been answered 100s of times and the current atheist vs Christian questions have moved way beyond this basic rhetoric! I would suggest lengthy study into a topic before interviewing people with this kind of argumentation - as most likely the very basic things one thinks on the onset of a topic thats been around for millilenia has more than likely been said or discussed before
@@jemjustice if you answer a question from an atheist, should that atheist accept your answer, or, if they feel it doesn't fully answer the question, should they push back and ask for clarification?. Eg: What is Hell exactly?
I've followed Ask Cliffe channel for over a decade now, as an atheist, i love watching his interactions with the students, I virtually always side with the students in these debates. One of Cliffes biggest strawman arguments is that "atheists are moral relativists and therefore we believe it's equally valid to punch someone in the face or to feed the homeless, as Cliffe (wrongly) says ( on behalf of all atheists) "It's all relative". No Cliffe, that is not how atheists see things, we simply lack belief in God. As for morality, I don't know of *any* atheist who would regard punching someone and feeding someone as "equally valid", one causes great harm and pain (bad), the other is mightily beneficial to the person being fed when hungry (good).
Bottom line is that until verifiable evidence of any 'deity' is provided, the question ultimately doesn't matter. Now, if this is just for the purpose of a faith belief, then I'll stick with actual Bible scholars over apologists.
Cliffe Knechtle is a renowned Christian apologist and speaker, famous for his "Give Me an Answer" events where he addresses live, unscripted questions on Christianity. He has spoken on over 100 college campuses and at numerous churches worldwide. Knechtle is recognized for engaging with people of all worldviews, fostering respectful dialogue on faith and spirituality. Through his speaking, books, and media, he has impacted countless individuals, especially those seeking answers to life's big questions. His approachable, intellectual style has made him a well-known figure in Christian apologetics. For the Sake of Argument podcast: TH-cam: www.youtube.com/@jakenewfield Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/4k9DDGJz02ibpUpervM5EY Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/for-the-sake-of-argument/id1567749546 Twitter: twitter.com/JakeNewfield
Stuart brings up Josephus as being a credible non Christian who attests that Jesus was who he said he was. Here's the thing though, if you were to add up all the mentions of Jesus in the entire works of Josephus, it would amount to about 0.000,000,01% of his entire works. Various biblical scholars believe those rare mentions of Jesus were much later interpolations shoe horned into Josephus's works at a later date by Christian scholars.
@@Bennyboy210es el mismo sistema que utiliza Dios en el viejo testamento. Dios se llama en el antiguo testamento: 1.Elohim 2.Adonai 3. Jehova 4. El Señor 5. Yo soy 6.Hashem etc. Jesús se le llamo: 1.Jesus 2. Emanuel 3. Mesías 4. Cristo (es lo mismo que mesías) 5. Salvador 6. Hijo del Hombre 7. Unigénitos hijo de Dios. etc. Cada nombre tiene un significado que representa quien es la persona o que propósito tiene. Nosotros hoy día ponemos nombres por poner nombres pero en la biblia los nombres tenían propósito. Nombres y su traducción: Jesús:Dios salva Mesías:Salvador/Libertador Cristo:Ungido Emanuel: Dios con notros A quien fue escrito esto, claramente le estaban dejando saber que Jesús era El Salvador del mundo, el ungido, el cual por medio de Dios seríamos salvos y era Dios con nosotros en la tierra. Es mucho más profundo de lo que se lee. Por eso las escrituras hay que escudriñarlas y pedirle al espíritu santo que nos muestre el propósito de ellas. Elohim:Dios/Supremo/Poderoso Adonai:Señor Jehova: El eterno Hashem: El nombre
You punched Stuart in the face with the first question and he never recovered. Other than Aron ra and matt Dillahunty, who destroyed Cliffe and Stuart, you held their feet to the fire. I watch them with edited videos from college kids appear too knowledgeable Thank for this, I only wish it was longer. You should debate Cliffe and Stuart. Cliffe and Stuart are a mix of assertions, fallacies and untruths to me.
What was the best part of this debate?
Just finished this debate - you have around 100-150 hours worth of study at least into the rebuttals. Not only did you bunch up and not understand the questions and responses - the questions you where trying to say are very level 1 atheist type arguments that have probably been around for at least 80 years - these have all been answered 100s of times and the current atheist vs Christian questions have moved way beyond this basic rhetoric! I would suggest lengthy study into a topic before interviewing people with this kind of argumentation - as most likely the very basic things one thinks on the onset of a topic thats been around for millilenia has more than likely been said or discussed before
@@jemjustice if you answer a question from an atheist, should that atheist accept your answer, or, if they feel it doesn't fully answer the question, should they push back and ask for clarification?. Eg: What is Hell exactly?
I've followed Ask Cliffe channel for over a decade now, as an atheist, i love watching his interactions with the students, I virtually always side with the students in these debates. One of Cliffes biggest strawman arguments is that "atheists are moral relativists and therefore we believe it's equally valid to punch someone in the face or to feed the homeless, as Cliffe (wrongly) says ( on behalf of all atheists) "It's all relative". No Cliffe, that is not how atheists see things, we simply lack belief in God. As for morality, I don't know of *any* atheist who would regard punching someone and feeding someone as "equally valid", one causes great harm and pain (bad), the other is mightily beneficial to the person being fed when hungry (good).
Bottom line is that until verifiable evidence of any 'deity' is provided, the question ultimately doesn't matter. Now, if this is just for the purpose of a faith belief, then I'll stick with actual Bible scholars over apologists.
Cliffe Knechtle is a renowned Christian apologist and speaker, famous for his "Give Me an Answer" events where he addresses live, unscripted questions on Christianity. He has spoken on over 100 college campuses and at numerous churches worldwide. Knechtle is recognized for engaging with people of all worldviews, fostering respectful dialogue on faith and spirituality. Through his speaking, books, and media, he has impacted countless individuals, especially those seeking answers to life's big questions. His approachable, intellectual style has made him a well-known figure in Christian apologetics.
For the Sake of Argument podcast:
TH-cam: www.youtube.com/@jakenewfield
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/4k9DDGJz02ibpUpervM5EY
Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/for-the-sake-of-argument/id1567749546
Twitter: twitter.com/JakeNewfield
Stuart brings up Josephus as being a credible non Christian who attests that Jesus was who he said he was. Here's the thing though, if you were to add up all the mentions of Jesus in the entire works of Josephus, it would amount to about 0.000,000,01% of his entire works. Various biblical scholars believe those rare mentions of Jesus were much later interpolations shoe horned into Josephus's works at a later date by Christian scholars.
Isaiah 7:14; Immanuel means God with us(the same as God in flesh or the Son of God).
Maybe but it doesn't say Jesus or yeshua
@@Bennyboy210es el mismo sistema que utiliza Dios en el viejo testamento. Dios se llama en el antiguo testamento:
1.Elohim
2.Adonai
3. Jehova
4. El Señor
5. Yo soy
6.Hashem
etc.
Jesús se le llamo:
1.Jesus
2. Emanuel
3. Mesías
4. Cristo (es lo mismo que mesías)
5. Salvador
6. Hijo del Hombre
7. Unigénitos hijo de Dios.
etc.
Cada nombre tiene un significado que representa quien es la persona o que propósito tiene. Nosotros hoy día ponemos nombres por poner nombres pero en la biblia los nombres tenían propósito.
Nombres y su traducción:
Jesús:Dios salva
Mesías:Salvador/Libertador
Cristo:Ungido
Emanuel: Dios con notros
A quien fue escrito esto, claramente le estaban dejando saber que Jesús era El Salvador del mundo, el ungido, el cual por medio de Dios seríamos salvos y era Dios con nosotros en la tierra. Es mucho más profundo de lo que se lee. Por eso las escrituras hay que escudriñarlas y pedirle al espíritu santo que nos muestre el propósito de ellas.
Elohim:Dios/Supremo/Poderoso
Adonai:Señor
Jehova: El eterno
Hashem: El nombre
You punched Stuart in the face with the first question and he never recovered. Other than Aron ra and matt Dillahunty, who destroyed Cliffe and Stuart, you held their feet to the fire. I watch them with edited videos from college kids appear too knowledgeable Thank for this, I only wish it was longer. You should debate Cliffe and Stuart. Cliffe and Stuart are a mix of assertions, fallacies and untruths to me.