Appreciate that friend, I always let everything render out before export, change render cache to smart, I’ll edit in a 1080p timeline, then once everything is finalized I’ll duplicate it and change to a 4k timeline, render, run errands and then export. Under output & quality > normal - fast works perfectly fine. Also it helps to have your “working folders” > cache location on your fastest drive either internally or on a fast SSD. Hope that helps!
You continue to out do yourself sir. Just curious, if you had a choice of B cam to the r5 mark ii, would you go for an original r5 or r6 mark ii. I’m doing light even work and a couple of weddings here and there. Some portraits and video work. Well done and Yosemite looks amazing and tranquil……
Appreciate the kind words Ed 🙏 If I already had the R5 ii I’d go with the R6 ii. Main reason being the original R5 still has the 29min record limit while the R6 ii does not. R5 is a great camera but you’ve got that covered with the V2! Hope that helps! I’ve used it as a b cam to both the R5C & C70 and the footage cuts almost perfectly.
Hi! Would you be open to share some of the raw video files via google drive or something so that we can take a closer look without the creative LUT that you applied? I’m seriously considering this camera right now and any unedited canon raw test footage would be greatly appreciated! Thank you so so much for this video! Amazing shots as always!
I’ll do one of two things: typically I’ll render in place but also what I’ve done is edit and entire video in a 1080 timeline then once finished I’ll drop that into a 4k timeline, go run some errands, to let it render out and export it. Canon footage has been surprisingly smooth to work with and I’m on an intel MBP. The other key here though is for the cache files to be stored either on your internal drive or a very fast external ssd. Proxies would def be an option too!
I saw that you use EF lenses, does the autofocus works well with the adapter? Your video is amazing, i got one in preorder and cant wait anymore! Sorry for my english i’m french 😅
@@arthuro1140 your English is better than most native speakers friend! EF lenses work FANTASTICALLY with the canon brand adapter. I’ve not tested others. Autofocus has always been very accurate in both photo and video. Plus I love the look that older EF glass gives va the newer glass. Newer glass is almost too sharp/contrasty for me for video at least.
@@arthuro1140I know everyone says this here on TH-cam but it’s because it’s true. The colors still differ. I favor Canon which is why I went that route. You can edit them to be similar but I find Canon to take less time to get to where I want it. AF they are both equally reliable. The Sony has the dual base iso at 12800 which is very useful I find. Slog3 is very malleable when editing. Objectively I’d give an edge to the FX3 simply because it has dual XLR inputs. Subjectively the Canon’s I think are better hybrid cameras. In truth you really can’t go wrong with either!
In both raw formats the autofocus works exactly as it does in normal codecs (really good). You cannot use digital IS in either 8k RAW nor 4k s raw. I want to say you cannot use IBIS either but let me double check and report back.
Haha I think for most the R6 ii is a great tool. For content creators it’s perfect. The main improvements are Clog2 and RAW video along with 2k240 & 4k120. The wobble is better comparing the two in the R5ii but not completely gone. R6ii is still a beast of a camera for sure!
@@davidjorozco for sure, i was waiting for more shadow recovery in clog 2 to underexpose and gain more rich skies but in thend looks pretty similar to my r6 as far i can see.... bur for photography is other business
Great Content. Do you enjoy the Canon R5 Mark 2 more than your Sony Fx3/A7s3? I am trying to decide between the two: if you were to purchase a camera, what would you choose
@@MODESTYXO205 the FX3 / A7siii is a primary video mirrorless camera that can also shoot great stills. It’s incredibly popular because it’s very good at what it does. The R5ii is a 50/50 photo & video camera. I’ve bounced back and forth for years but ultimately the Canon makes me want to use it more whereas the Sony feels like a tool that I only want to use for “work”. I’d pick the R5 ii personally. But either choice is a fantastic one. Go pick them up if possible and see which one you are drawn to. Best of luck!!
so good
Appreciate that!
Mesmerising colors
Thank you my friend 🙏
Amazing video! And so calm. Wish you all the best
Appreciate that friend, was exactly the feeling I wanted to bring back from Yosemite. Cheers
Wow best video yet. I love the storyline format that you created with this, I forgot I was watching a camera review!
Glad you enjoyed it! 🖤
Incredible work and captivating colors! Any tips on reducing export times when using Dehancer?
Appreciate that friend, I always let everything render out before export, change render cache to smart, I’ll edit in a 1080p timeline, then once everything is finalized I’ll duplicate it and change to a 4k timeline, render, run errands and then export.
Under output & quality > normal - fast works perfectly fine. Also it helps to have your “working folders” > cache location on your fastest drive either internally or on a fast SSD. Hope that helps!
need it
Well done! Now we see an upgrade in dynamic range on Canon mirrorless body.
Thank you my friend, it’s been long overdue 🙏
You continue to out do yourself sir. Just curious, if you had a choice of B cam to the r5 mark ii, would you go for an original r5 or r6 mark ii. I’m doing light even work and a couple of weddings here and there. Some portraits and video work.
Well done and Yosemite looks amazing and tranquil……
Appreciate the kind words Ed 🙏
If I already had the R5 ii I’d go with the R6 ii. Main reason being the original R5 still has the 29min record limit while the R6 ii does not. R5 is a great camera but you’ve got that covered with the V2! Hope that helps! I’ve used it as a b cam to both the R5C & C70 and the footage cuts almost perfectly.
@@davidjorozco appreciate that!
Hi! Would you be open to share some of the raw video files via google drive or something so that we can take a closer look without the creative LUT that you applied? I’m seriously considering this camera right now and any unedited canon raw test footage would be greatly appreciated! Thank you so so much for this video! Amazing shots as always!
I’m actually working on something but the short answer is yes! Just give me a little bit of time 👍🏽
@@davidjorozco Thank you for replying! I'll be looking forward to that update! :)
What is your 8K workflow look like in Davinci Resolve? My computer struggles with the raw files. Are you creating proxies or rendering them in place?
I’ll do one of two things: typically I’ll render in place but also what I’ve done is edit and entire video in a 1080 timeline then once finished I’ll drop that into a 4k timeline, go run some errands, to let it render out and export it.
Canon footage has been surprisingly smooth to work with and I’m on an intel MBP. The other key here though is for the cache files to be stored either on your internal drive or a very fast external ssd.
Proxies would def be an option too!
I saw that you use EF lenses, does the autofocus works well with the adapter?
Your video is amazing, i got one in preorder and cant wait anymore!
Sorry for my english i’m french 😅
@@arthuro1140 your English is better than most native speakers friend!
EF lenses work FANTASTICALLY with the canon brand adapter. I’ve not tested others. Autofocus has always been very accurate in both photo and video. Plus I love the look that older EF glass gives va the newer glass. Newer glass is almost too sharp/contrasty for me for video at least.
@@davidjorozco so happy, i’ll use my 100-400EF then 😊
@@davidjorozcoi also saw that you have been using a7siii, how does it compare to the r5ii?
@@arthuro1140I know everyone says this here on TH-cam but it’s because it’s true. The colors still differ. I favor Canon which is why I went that route. You can edit them to be similar but I find Canon to take less time to get to where I want it.
AF they are both equally reliable. The Sony has the dual base iso at 12800 which is very useful I find. Slog3 is very malleable when editing. Objectively I’d give an edge to the FX3 simply because it has dual XLR inputs. Subjectively the Canon’s I think are better hybrid cameras. In truth you really can’t go wrong with either!
Great video.
Thank you 🙏
I really like you footage and the review, David. How do you think about the line-scipped 4k 60p in the non-RAW-mode?
There are a couple clips in the video of that and truthfully I’m less of a pixel peeper however the 4k60 looks good.
Not as good as Blackmagic Pocket 6k, was hoping it would be closer.
Looks great! Does IBIS and Autofocus work when shooting raw? Both 8K normal raw and also sRAW ? Thanks
In both raw formats the autofocus works exactly as it does in normal codecs (really good). You cannot use digital IS in either 8k RAW nor 4k s raw. I want to say you cannot use IBIS either but let me double check and report back.
@@davidjorozco Awesome! Thanks
Looks great man but i dont see any amazing upgrade over the r62, maybe im not looking with the right eyes haha ?
Haha I think for most the R6 ii is a great tool. For content creators it’s perfect. The main improvements are Clog2 and RAW video along with 2k240 & 4k120. The wobble is better comparing the two in the R5ii but not completely gone.
R6ii is still a beast of a camera for sure!
@@davidjorozco for sure, i was waiting for more shadow recovery in clog 2 to underexpose and gain more rich skies but in thend looks pretty similar to my r6 as far i can see.... bur for photography is other business
Great Content. Do you enjoy the Canon R5 Mark 2 more than your Sony Fx3/A7s3? I am trying to decide between the two: if you were to purchase a camera, what would you choose
@@MODESTYXO205 the FX3 / A7siii is a primary video mirrorless camera that can also shoot great stills. It’s incredibly popular because it’s very good at what it does.
The R5ii is a 50/50 photo & video camera. I’ve bounced back and forth for years but ultimately the Canon makes me want to use it more whereas the Sony feels like a tool that I only want to use for “work”.
I’d pick the R5 ii personally. But either choice is a fantastic one. Go pick them up if possible and see which one you are drawn to. Best of luck!!
@@davidjorozco Thanks for the response
It’s actually pronounced Yo-si-mites. -Donald J. Trump