It didn’t thrill me but it did pique interest. IMO going from land to sea was much easier (to be a nomad) then it was going from earth to space. Two vastly different means. So it’s a bit facetious and rhetorical to ask that question. Yes some of us would like to be nomads but that’s easier said than done
Seriously though.. if humans weren't so petty and we worked as a species instead of killing each other and dividing ourselves into nations and religions, we'd totally have a manned base on Mars by now.
@@TheBoeboe I don't believe that. Humans were looking towards the stars way before the war. If anything, all the wars only slowed down the inevitable discoveries.
I would like to invite Mr.Ryan Weed to my country. We can not contribute to your idea and project, honestly. But we need human beings like you to enlighten our people.
Good point. Even at just half light-speed, impact with a one-microgramme dust particle is going to yield more than 11GJ of energy. Some form of multilayered shield, possibly?
Simple your spaceship' mass has increased (relativistic mass) compared to dust particle - so it would obliterate said particle (Voyagers still there 40 years later)!
While there still is dust particles you have to remember that is IS space and interstellar space is WAY more empty than the emptiness that we call space around earth is. But still, there are some(in the most generous sense of the word).
@@tomctutor, 1) from your rest perspective, the dust particle is the one with all the momentum, so it would obliterate you. 2) Voyager isn't traveling anywhere near relativistic speeds.
If you guys saw that tv show the boys in the opening episode you have the runner just PLOW through that woman on the side walk. It's a similar comparison. If you try to put 1 human through another human its bloody difficult. But add speed and you now have kinetic energy making you much more packed with mass and evenly focused and moving in one direction and boom he plowed right through her. Same thing with a ship. As long as you have a good heads up display to avoid bigger things like planets and comets I think you would plow through smaller objects in space due to your mass and speed. Kinetic energy is where its at. Throw a bullet through someone by hand. It's not going to do much. Now fire it from a gun and that lead piece will you right thru you.
I would love to see a follow-on video about how you would navigate through space as you go faster and faster to avoid hitting solid matter which would destroy you. 1g constant acceleration doesnt sound much if you have a constant energy source but navigation safely would be tricky to say the least.
You nailed it. We are explorers...always have been. Going against that, is what is causing so much unrest. We don't have something to focus on as humanity....so we spend our time focusing on ourselves, and that's a bad idea. We are all flawed. Let's get back to exploration, and give humanity hope and something to focus on.
Incredible..and he explained all those in such a simplistic way i understood exactly everything he said. I have zero scientific background or self study on these matters.
Why don't you quit your job and do something good instead? Seriously? Unless you somehow already shackled yourself with responsibilities, the only limitation is your mind.
Hello. Great video! Would love to help clarify for viewers: At 85% the speed of light, using antimatter propulsion, someone would arrive in 2.7 years, not 5. To us, of course, nothing can go faster than the speed of light.. which is a crazy thing considering that Alpha Centauri system is approximately 4.367 light years away. However, we have to consider relativity. On Earth, 'I see' (with my own eyes) that it takes 'you' 5 years to travel to Alpha Centauri. On the other hand, if 'you' are the one traveling to Alpha Centauri, only 2.7 years pass between the time you left Earth and arrived on Alpha Centauri. Gotta love time dilation.
However, it makes me wonder and it makes me anxious just by thinking that a person who took off to Alpha Centauri would just feel as if 2.7 yrs have passed while it would be 5 years for us. The gap widens again with our target being distant. So does it mean that the person on the spaceship is a futurist who can actually go forward in time? I am not an astrophysicist just a novice but always curious and silly!
Well done. His conclusion answers a question I've always had: how can we travel beyond this galaxy when millennia would have passed on Earth? This only matters if you want to return to Earth. Multiple Earth-origin exploration civilizations could exist while being unable to have contact across the gulf of time separating them. The solution is simple, we exist independently, ontologically separated by time. So we accept that and say goodbye to Earth. Excellent.
it's people like this, often behind the scenes (getting evicted by nervous landlords!) that are inching humanity towards fantastic possibilities. Sir, I salute you.
Google "4th generation nuclear weapons". Use of micrograms worth of antimatter as a trigger for miniature fusion bombs. You'll find a research paper and an informative youtube video. You bet they're after using antimatter for weapons production.
@DeadFishFactory: See the paper. Magnetic bottles are old hat. The new way to store is a micrometer sized matrix of magnetic bottles, with trigger for controlled release. You only need half a microgram or so to trigger a .1kt - .25kt fusion bomb the size of a hand grenade.
No. First thing humans would do with antimatter is what they do with every new thing.... try to have sex with it. Then they'll make a bomb. Humans. We're fucking stupid. Literally and figuratively WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
imagine flying in your little antimatter spacecraft in space and then more advanced human spacecraft overtakes you and they laugh at you from the window. or could they even do that i wonder?
Thanks for a very interesting, and even inspiring video! I think one thing that people don't take into account (and indeed, doesn't get mentioned often - even by professionals) is the simple and obvious fact that if (or when, as I prefer) we *_do_* make it to some other world with a living crew - whether that world is Proxima b or Mars - living conditions are not going to be favorable! We can only go there (again: wherever *_there_* is) expecting to either stay in orbit - using any available materials from asteroids, comets, etc. - to build larger orbiting platforms such as O'Neil cylinders, *_or_* we're going to have to build closed-off habitats down on the dirt, so to speak - either heavily shielded or domed structures above ground, or dug-in structures underground. Terraforming is *_not_* a light undertaking. If we go there for the long haul, we'll end up building a LOT of infrastructure before we even begin to consider it, as it could easily take millennia to accomplish (if it's even something we can do, really.) So I would deeply and greatly hope that *_all_* aspects of such a venture would be carefully considered - not piecemeal, by this company handling this, and that company dealing with that - but with *_all_* the companies, personnel, astronauts, etc., thinking through every bit of it, and considering every angle. To that end - and I know you may not think this is your 'area' - I truly believe the first long-term, if not permanent, colony we every build should be on the Moon. We've *_all_* got to get this right! The things we learn about living on other worlds - by living on the Moon first - will be nothing less than critical for the future of space travel - at *_any_* speed, and to *_any_* location. Thanks again. tavi.
> make it to some other world with a living crew - whether that world is Proxima b or Mars - living conditions are not going to be favorable! Youre ignoring alien hotel chains.
we marvel with awe at the builders of ancient buildings & cities which we can't duplicate or replicate yet we seek to travel across the universe. dream on!
So let's imagine: You take the Christmas M&M anti-matter matter shove it up the butt of a spaceship. Go to Kepler 452B. Get their in 12.5 years. Upon arriving you discover amazingly some civilization is already there! Surprisingly, over the radio they speak English, knowing your exact mission name and all crew on board. After 300 years on earth, discovery of warp drive technology was made; orders of magnitude faster than light speed without the time dilation. And after 1,500 earth years, already entire colonies are on the planet, terraformed and has a vibrant zoology and colony.
after 1500 years hope humanity on earth is still alive though if we went out in space to settle colonies they might have a better chance at surviving then us here on earth
I was thinking the same thing. Send you on a probe and another probe is passing you that was built more advanced on earth because of the dialation. You arrive there to find humanity found a better faster way and already have skyscrapers being built on it when you arrive by your great great x150 grandson. crazy talk
That is bound to happen, so all the "aliens" "out there" will most likely be from earth and most likely all be within 50 years of age of each other, but due to time dilation be thousands or billions of years different in relative age - wrap your head around that!
That's certainly possible. But if it would keep you from going, then you're the wrong sort of person to be sending out on *_any_* spaceship - now or in some 'perfected future' that's never gonna happen! It's the same as people who say we shouldn't do anything about climate change *_yet_***, because the science isn't perfect ***_yet_***, so we should just wait and see. What if people never spread out from Africa, because one guy said, "You know, I think one day someone's gonna invent a better way to travel than just walking around lugging everything!" We don't have to know all the ***_answers_* now; we just have to *_start_* now. Besides, it would be very, very rude of them to pass us right by, start a colony, then wait for us to get there - all without even *_bothering_* to let us know anything. And they'd *_have_* to know we were out there. Pioneering is *_not_* for the feint of heart, for sure. I couldn't do it. Then again, it's not *_supposed_* to be! tavi.
One thing he never addressed and solved was the amount of matter that exists even at interstellar space, all of which you will be slamming into. And the faster you go, the more devastating they become.
Yup there would be a ton of problems that we would need to solve before this becomes remotely possible. Slamming into stuff, decelerating, maintaining human health and wellness, hibernation, protocols for encountering other intelligent life etc
Yeah this is a problem that realistically seems to be one of the biggest concerns for me. I know there is a huge open space with nearly nothing between stars (and galaxies) but an asteroid the size of 1 mm that hit us at near-lightspeed would basically have the impact of a nuclear bomb i think. How do you prevent that? Sure, we can think of some new exotic matter or shielding that could withstand the impacts but eventually you have to turn the ships antimatter engine around to decelerate and when you do that, wouldn't you have the risk of impact again? Maybe you could shield both front and backside - dunno. They touched this concept in the new Star Wars movie
The best thing we can do is work on cryo pods and research more about induced hypothermia. We humans are curious, creative and highly imaginative beings. If only the earth was united as one, we would have long become a type 2 civilisation and would have explored a lot through space.
We're not even at Type 1 yet. Type 2 is estimated to be about another 800 centuries in the future..... We are nowhere close to harnessing all the energy of our sun, and no amount of unity would have changed that.
1) Like in the book "Tau Zero", you are forgetting that you need to flip around and start decelerating half-way to your final destination or you will simply fly past it very fast. This will probably increase travel time at least 2x and probably 10x (I believe time dilation is exponential). You will probably need some sort of actual shields to protect you from space dust and such in the direction of travel. 2) I believe the best "propulsion" comes from the "Philadelphia Experiment" and "Montauk Project". This is matter/people teleportation. I think I read somewhere that it is actually being used now to place people on the Moon and even Mars almost instantaneously. A ship like this can probably get to Alpha Centauri in days in several hops. In fact, I believe, we have already colonized planets around stars to at least 1000 LY WITHOUT time dilation. Look into it...
So a few questions I have about his time/distance numbers: 1) Is he accounting for deceleration? Or just a constant acceleration? Like would the burn be going the whole way or would they flip at halfway or so to begin deceleration? Would it have to be at the halfway point to accommodate the 1g limit? 2) If we're deciding to send people - what about a return journey? 3) Why not just send robots? Wouldn't they have much higher limits on acceptable gravity, what with no squishy bodies and all?
Somebody should have checked his math before presentation. I think he may have used rocket speed for his calculation because covering the first and second distances only take 38 and 116 days not months and years respectively. How can this thing that we don't even understand be what helps us travel the fastest?
You can get to the Edge of the Universe in 30 years? So if you turned the ship around in, say, 10 years, you could come back and see the Earth several billion years in the future, assuming it still exists then? Mind blown...
Yeah makes no sense.... If its possible to bend Time and Space and travel somewhere else instantly then time shouldnt move at the Solar System... That ship should be able to back and forth using the same amount of time...
So I guess the Star Trek idea is off the table, if you want to boldly go where no one has gone before, it would mean never coming back. Or is anti-matter just not the way to go? Space folding? Artificial wormholes? Instantaneous travel from one point in space to another seems the only way to have interstellar travel and be able to do it without time debts. As a trekkie I'm a bit disappointed.
NatalieCatLee Wormhole is space folding, but in order to make an artificial wormhole you would have to prove that wormholes are able to exist and recreate the conditions that make one. At this point they are in the high realm of sci fi.
Yes, I know. Unfortunately it's still scifi and the only place we'll be seeing it in our life times is in fiction. I don't know if you read the book series "Hyperion" by Dan Simmons, he has some interesting ideas about these subjects, great read.
I think it's also important to keep in mind that Physics is a relatively new field and though we may not understand it well enough now to travel fast, one day we may.
Our bigger problem is even if we come up with technology human meat bags have short life expectancies and they do not handle the high energy radiation discovered by voyager outside of the heliosphere. We are more suited to living under water than we are to living in space .... and we have hardly mastered this yet. after all we have zero colonies under water... why not?
Regarding his question at the end of whether we want to be nomads again... I would gladly be a space nomad, so long as I had all the comforts. Or a space viking? It's a nice fantasy.
That method was illustrated in Cosmos by Carl Sagan; it is attractive in principle. You then have to find a way to transform that mass/energy captured into light directed backward...
If you try Bussard ramjet (collecting atoms for hydrogen fusion) you slow down more than accelerate. i.e. no way you can collect needed atoms, perhaps onboard turn them to antimatter etc. on the way - you should still carry the mass like ordinary rockets do OR get stream of propellant somehow from somewhere for a very long time. Energy of this received propellant would diminish as the ship would get closer to lightspeed. Not to mention all stuff the ship'd hit... This guy is a fraud. He could've as well counted how many kg's of food needs to be stored for 50 years voyage ignoring all other problems !
It's also not possible to reach high relativistic velocities, even with an anti-matter photon drives (which this researcher does not propose, he proposes conversion to charged particles first). You'd be lucky to get to 10% to 15% c with this engine. Which is pretty damn respectable. You'd be tooting around the solar system very nicely at those speeds. As long as you don't hit anything. But interstellar with that technology would require suspended animation or life extension.
I really appreciate the work that you guys are doing, and I understand that when you discussed the time needed to travel to the edge of the observable universe, you just wanted to qualitatively illustrate the vast distances possible to travel at an acceleration of 1 g. But it is actually impossible for us to travel to the edge of the universe even at the speed of light because the universe is expanding at a greater speed because of the presence of dark energy. Just wanted to clarify this so that people do not develop wrong perceptions.
Great presentation and nice to know that someone is working on this but I can see a problem which does not seem to have been discussed. If you are able to perfect the technology and travel at close to the speed of light, if you hit something the size of a grain of sand, that will be enough to destroy your space ship.
A very real problem that they've already had to tackle with the ISS and space probes. I know the ISS uses an orbital debris shield, but travelling interstellar at light speed poses it to be a much greater problem.
"If we go at 1 g aceel we get there in 3.5 weeks ..." However, did I miss him discuss deceleration? Not only do our theoretical explorers have to factor in decel, but as so many others pointed out, all life support mass and propellant mass would have to be considered. Realistically, there can be no interstellar travel unless/until some means of FTL is discovered and safely applied.
StuuDude well its not living so it doesnt matter and its only 1 of trillions and trillions and trillions of planets in the infinite universe, so sure feel bad
A very good point, no one even considered that here but you. Half way the spaceship would have to turn around 180 degrees and reverse thrusters, still 1g though so maybe his calculations out by a factor of 2x.
I like how he doesn't mention deceleration... that greatly extends the time required as you have to slow down by aiming your thrusting apparatus in the opposite direction presumably with even more thrust and g forces than the acceleration if you don't want to start deceleration at the halfway point.
We explore for survival or profit. Not out of curiosity. Humans like comfort, and repetition. We fear the unknown and tend to be practical. Individuals that stray from the pack, break the mold, make their own way or are driven by curiosity usually don't live long. How can scientists be so romantic when it comes to space travel but so pragmatic about most everything else?
Interstellar travel might occur without intentionally trying to do so. Primitive man migrated to six of the seven continents on Earth not be intentionally traveling to another continent but by building another village over the next hill. Likewise, if we just build Stanford Torus's, Bernal Sphere's and O'Neill Cylinders out of asteroids and comets then we would migrate to nearby stars without even trying to do so. There would be no issue of being outpaced by faster technology as the habitats you live on would be your destination in the first place and we already know there are interstellar resources as an extrasolar asteroid recently passed through our solar system. One asteroid can build and power a lot of city scale habitats.
The universe is expanding, even at near light speed travel, mankind can't reach outside the local group. So the example of reaching "the edge of the universe" is a bit strange if he haven't invented a real warp drive :)
Jörgen no sense what you said, the expansion on the univers is not the speed of light more of the time, so you can go to other galaxies out of local, on any time soon
The expression "hasn't been figured out yet" should never be used when making predictions. If it hasn't been figured out yet, we necessarily have no way of knowing that it will ever be figured out at all, i.e., we can't know if it's even physically possible. We can imagine lots things that are physically impossible, that doesn't mean that we could ever "figure them out".
Pabloxd123 - Taking relativistic effects into account, the trip to go further than our milky way could be accomplished in 20,000 light-years from the perspective of an observer on Earth. If someone attempted it, you would never hear from them in your life time.
Jörgen I thought you ride along with the expansion of the universe so the more outer edge you go the faster you’d move, along with the expansion? We currently on earth are indeed moving away from other distant galaxies as we speak, in relative to them we might be moving at the speed of light, right? Correct me if I’m wrong.
That is a theory based on some highly debatable proof. If you take a close look at the proof then you'll see some holes appearing. There is a part of the scientific community that thinks that it isn't expanding or at least not as fast as they think.
He’s such a hunk! I understand all the science he’s talking about. I have four degrees. It’s just nice at my age to see a hunky guy helping to educate younger people.
There is no choice. We either move into space or our species becomes extinct. The sun will not last forever so the only way our species can survive is to go somewhere new and to be prepared to move on from there after a while. Even all this eventually becomes moot as the universe does have a limited life. But, we have got to at least try. Is there anything more important than the survival of our species? I don't think so.
Pabloxd123 Asteroids can at least be redirected or intercepted, and we can see them coming. Gamma ray bursts are more of a real danger because you can never see them coming, even if the Earth is much less likely to get hit by these.
There's not really a reason why we couldn't do this over the long term. Of course, we'll have to leave eventually. The sun is already at half of its life expectancy. It'd be a shame to let all Life die because we don't take its worth seriously. Preserving Life in the long term implies developing space exploration as much as possible. It is a moral obligation.
"Already" at half? That's still soooooo much time we have. I don't get why many humans now want to rush in a period of a few decades/centuries to explore asap other planets so we can save our species. We have at least a billion years to go until the sun's expansion will be too big. A billion years is so incredible long, that if evolution would have started a million years later, we still would say we have more than enough time before the sun dies. So actually the next million years (and even much longer) we can take it easy and no need to rush.
Given the chance, I would definitely embark on something like that, it’s a once in a lifetime opportunity, imagine that, being among the first humans in another system, galaxy.. if many worlds are conquered over a timespan, one day humans can become the first (maybe) sentient beings connected by multiple interstellar - planetary communities. That’s a sentence you don’t say everyday lol
Imagine millions years later, all good planets in Milky Way colonized by humans without any space bending stuff. Тraveling faster than light impossible, thus there won't be any interstellar community, All colonies will on their own like separate civilizations with own history and culture. They will only receive messages from other colonies sent. hundreds or thousands years before. And eventually they will forget what planet humans came from or maybe some civilizations will not.
Who says FTL is impossible? Einstein? He was wrong. According to Bell's theorem (proven by Aspect et al 1981) either FTL messaging is possible OR the universe is self-aware down to each and every particle
Enjoy and take care of this planet. It's our only home and always will be. The sheer numbers and distances is mind boggling to say the least. By the time we have the technology to become "nomads" in outer space we would already be extinct either by wars , climate change or by some other extinction event. You cannot compare being "nomadic" on earth to being a "nomad" out there.There's huge hurdles to overcome.
An hour before I thought I was a serious man. Now I'm watching a guy who's name is Weed talking about interstellar travel to the end of the universe that he believes to be possible by an antimatter drive that he started doing in the office before he moved to the nuclear fallout shelter and he seems to be quite reasonable to me. Should I worry about myself?
Is he trolling us ? It takes (93 Gly) 92936344969,19946 YEARS FOR LIGHT ITSELF to even reach the OBSERVABLE universe, how is it possible for us to reach the EDGE of the universe with a spacecraft in a LIFETIME ?
I can't believe I'm only just seeing this video now 2 years later, this relates to my book I've wrote, and this ties in with the Fermi paradox, kind of solves it really. But it justifies my book entirely on why we need to survive as a human race, although Ive said in my book we need to travel. We need to sort out earth. In short you are a legend Ryan Weed, and you have explained the Fermi paradox.
When I was 14 years old in the year 2000, I posed a question to a guy giving a speech at a local university about 3D printing. Now, that vision has come true. As such, I believe that we will one day build teleportation devices for living beings, food, etc which will (on a basic level) be 3D printers.
Why does no one ever bring up the fact that it does not matter how fast you travel, you can't travel in a straight line..... eventually you would hit a planet or debris.
Try Transubstantiation! That’s the key to faster than light travel, because there is no mass associated with craft and occupants. If you raise the vibration of an object, it disappears, and vice versa. The craft can be made to disappear, then reappear at the chosen destination. Virtually instantly.
As a Trekie, the notion of intra and interstellar travel fascinates me. But the distances are so immense and the effect of time dilation so extreme that it puts a whole new twist on the term: "Live long and prosper." Man, you gotta REALLY live long to prosper on that flight. Unfortunately, I just don't see us cracking the code unless we can figure out how to cheat time itself. But I absolutely believe asteroid mining will be a thing in this century. I do wonder if a large influx of precious metals will drive down the value to a point where the law of diminishing returns will kick in and make the effort not worth the trip but I'll be honest, I got a B in economics so my concern could be way off base on that one. Cool talk.
*if everything goes well, we can have the first pictures of Proxima b in 2060, hopefully sooner if something faster than light sails is created or discovered*
Technically, laser propulsion of light sails could easily out accelerate an antimatter drive so long as the light sail could still be targeted by the laser which brings to mind the concept of laser relay stations to establish a highway in space. Remember reflecting light doubles the momentum you receive and with sails you do not have to carry the energy source not the propellent mass.
Callum Macleod he didn’t say faster than light he said faster than light sails a light sail travels at 20% the speed of light. Also things can travel faster than the speed of light. Everything past the edge of the visible universe has accelerated to faster than the speed of light hence why we can’t see it
Julio Giron nothing can travel faster than the speed of light in a vacuum but the universe itself is expanding faster than the speed of light causing everything within the universe to slowly accelerate to infinite speeds, everything on the outer edge of the universe is expanding faster than the speed of light so we can never see it again because the objects themselves are traveling too fast for the light to catch up to us
Even if we have anti-matter propellant, how to maintain 1G acceleration when the spaceship's speed reaches near light speed? Wouldn't it take almost infinite amount of energy?
No. In the ships rest frame, for one g acceleration, you always need the same amount of fuel per unit time. However, seen from the earth's frame of reference, the ship will accelerate less and less the closer it comes to c.
Exploration is one of life's purpose, it shall be done synergistically while helping people in need here on earth (for example build housing for poor people living in extreme environments, hot or cold, to help perfect housing designs for other planet). To travel light speed we will have to travel as informations in a laser beam which can trigger matter in an other planet to form nanobots which in turn form robots. The next step is then to upload ourselves as informations into them. AI will be us uploading ourselves into avatar robots (transcendance). As for spacetime, I understand it as the perception of it to be relative. Time is based on the rotation of planets, so travelling light speed won't change planetary movements but change our perception of time on earth, which will come back to normal during the return trip.
Buenas noches , todo con mucha lógica y muy natural y sobre todo muy interesante la informacion que habla el Sr:Ryan Weed. volver a empezar la vida de nuevo .
Is he proposing producing anti-matter on Earth and storing it in the spaceship or is he proposing creating the anti-matter while flying? At one point, he was talking about using radioactive decay to create anti-matter. If he brings that radiation source with him, he won't get any more energy than using the radiation source directly as a source of energy. You need to hold back enough fuel to stop the spacecraft when you reach your destination.
So, if we send someone on a near light travel to another star... won't we beat them to it? To them it would take years... but to us, we would have enough time to figure out faster then light travel and get there before they ever do.
Yup! Bending time space would allow us to get there quicker then someone going near light speed travel by leaps and bounds and we would have 150 years to beat them there.
Someone travelling at speed of light is already going to reach there instantly (per their ref frame.) If I am second traveller that starts with new faster physics, i must be at both the start and destination at the same time before my travel starts, or in other words, I must be travelling back in time too? That sound correct?
supergps2000 did you watch this video? Someone traveling 80 percent the speed of light with current technology will take just under a decade to reach our nearest star. People on earth would observe those travelers as taking 150 years to get there. The travelers will experience time around them speed up while they remain un-effected. They will personally experience 8 years of time while everything 80 percent the speed of light slower then them experience 150 years. They will get to there destination 150 years later but would only experience 8 of those years. They are traveling through space so fast that they also travel through time at an accelerated rate, hints Time Space. Idk how else to explain it. We have 150 years here on earth to beat them there by learning to bend time space and get there in just days without experiencing that same time dilation. Hell, they might be arriving to a future human settlement.
*The gentleman did not discuss Dimension Hopping. When we arrived we were being visited a million of years previously. I believe the little saucer things come as cargo in massive mother ships and they are not concerned about travelling at what is called the "speed of light" they travel inter-dimensionally. The little saucer things are for local travel once they get here*
While I think all interesting propellant technologies should be explored, there will always be huge problems with moving quickly through space.. only a small fraction of which are: 1- time spent (you also have to account for slowing down halfway to the target for 1g travel) 2- time spent back home relative to spacecraft 3- micrometeoroids and other collisions Because of just these few challenges.. *moving* through space is not likely going to be the way we end up exploring the galaxy... maybe some nearby stars until better tech is discovered.. but I doubt much more than that. I personally am confident that warping space or taking advantage of windows we don't know about yet is possible, and eventually something like that will be the way to explore space in any significant manner beyond our solar system. Definitely keep moving forward with whatever you have though... it's not like propulsion is the only thing a technology like that could be a game-changer for.
I just watched 3 videos about interstellar travel, and in each of them they mentioned a different vehicle as the fastest thing humans have ever created.
By any chance, was one of the other two a manhole cover flung by a nuclear bomb buried underground? Though not necessarily a vehicle, it is the fastest object we've ever created (even if done so unintentionally).
I would imagine the concept of PERPETUAL MOMENTUM would be a very good way to get high speed into outer space. But it could not be manned because we would have to keep our fingers crossed NOT TO HIT AN ASTEROID AND DESTROY THE CRAFT. So Perpetual Momentum, Sir Isaac Newton at the wheel
Making a lot of antimatter is a fantasy. Travel to the stars is possible only via multi generational ships if those ships can cruise at 5% to 10% the speed of light.
and who are you to say it is possible ONLY via whatever? just because stuff hasn't been invented yet doesn't mean it will not be. would humans who lived 500 years ago think radio or television were possible? what will the people 500 years from now think of us? "they thought FTL travel was impossible" could be one thing. ("they couldn't provide drinking water to everyone" could be another)
1138thz “is fantasy” is possible the funniest and most short sighted comment made about space exploration technology I’ve ever heard. You are literally saying the words my great grandpa said about making it to the moon. Can’t you see?
What about slowing down? Arriving at 75% the speed of light (taking away the actual other problems of protecting the craft) you still have to slow down enough to get off - That deceleration would also be limited to 1g - so - double the time?
We haven't seen the edge of the universe yet since it's traveling away from us faster than the speed of light. I believe what he was trying to communicate was the relative time dilation as a craft begins to near the speed of light, people in the craft should experience less time passing than the people left behind on earth and as the craft nears the edge of the observable universe, people in the craft may have experienced as little as 30 years whereas earth experienced 13 and a half trillion years. According to Einstein, the closer to the speed of light you get, the more your relative time dilates. So, relatively, time may come to a standstill for you as you near the speed of light as time goes on like normal down here on earth.
It takes billions of years in OUR time reference, but for the photon, it takes no time at all. If the photon had a conscious mind like ours, it would have experienced to have arrived on Earth instantly, because at light speed time does not pass. The edge-of-universe spaceship would experience 30 years, instead of no time at all (like the photon would) because it would be travelling at 0.99999999c, and not 1c.
@@bennemann hence the little known theory that all the electrons in the universe are in fact, just one electron, interacting with itself in a place with no time. I think it's called the one-electron universe, look it up.
We wouldn't be going at the speed of light for a little bit until we pass it. What he is saying is that we are accelerating at a continuous speed for as long as it takes us to get to the edge of the universe and since there is no friction in space, we would just keep going at an accelerating speed.
Terraforming and atmospheric manipulation to make it suitable for humans is going to be way way way harder than coming up with a way to quickly travel to a planet that is similar to Earth. Not to mention, the completely different planet or moon gravity.
@@prashantramachandran2153 Not necessarily. A tesla tube magnetic field could be created to protect prospective planets by placing a satellite at the L1 Lagrange point between the planet and the sun. This would prevent the new atmosphere from being stripped away by deflecting solar wind just like the Earth's magnetosphere. Genetically modified fungus or bacteria could be used to absorb the brine, CO2, and Perchlorate and produce useful substances that may one day sustain an atmosphere. We already have naturally-occurring bacteria on Earth that can survive in a nuclear reactor. It's not beyond comprehension that we may be able to accomplish terraforming without bending space-time, especially considering Mars has only 28.4% the surface area of Earth.
most of the solar system isn’t habitable due to the atmospheric properties and terrain of Venus, Mercury and Pluto. Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune and Uranus are all uninhabitable since they are made of gas and dangerous materials.
Here is why, But the crux of the problem is the same for all, you still need a better propulsion system. Any colony we build in our solar system will be dependent on earth or require massive construction. You can't wait 5 years for a supply to come to Jupiter moons or 10 years to Pluto. Mars takes six month only if the planets are aligned right otherwise 2 years. Now if you can supply Jupiter's moons in two months than you have a propulsion system that could take you to interstellar, and you can start building a huge spaceship in space one you have a good propulsion system.
I do believe that our dreams will come true. We look at the stars and hope to reach them so our best minds which have ever lived and live now have worked together to build hopefully a future for mankind in interstellar space. Sadly we will not be around to see it.
We have to start moving at light speed to interstellar travel. So get materials to harness the sun's power from other planets, bring it back and build a space ship like ship. Or an element that uses/manipulates the force of gravity as energy, positive or negative. Gravity is everywhere in space. Travelling to another Galaxy would need a time machine , which in science isn't so far fetched if you can harness the power of a blackhole.
"Do you want to be nomads again?"- Question thrilled me..
yes, and a couple of new empires
It didn’t thrill me but it did pique interest. IMO going from land to sea was much easier (to be a nomad) then it was going from earth to space. Two vastly different means. So it’s a bit facetious and rhetorical to ask that question. Yes some of us would like to be nomads but that’s easier said than done
Yes, very much so and a pirate too.
Absolutely
Yes..most likely bicycle touring this planet first..
This man deserve a huge amount of respect for what he has already achieved.
Regards, Geoff. Reeks
Absolutely, his patent is viaible and big corps will soon be trying to cash in.
Which is what, exactly?
Deserves*
I havent met him yet. If i do ill thank him sir. I believe you both
Seriously though.. if humans weren't so petty and we worked as a species instead of killing each other and dividing ourselves into nations and religions, we'd totally have a manned base on Mars by now.
But they want to spend all the money on the false-flag wars they've created... PROFIT
bit of a stretch tbh
if it werent for the space race, and the cold war, we might not even have space rockets
@@TheBoeboe I don't believe that. Humans were looking towards the stars way before the war. If anything, all the wars only slowed down the inevitable discoveries.
@@SuperRambo111 completely disagree... competition in most instances, equals improvement.
I would like to invite Mr.Ryan Weed to my country. We can not contribute to your idea and project, honestly. But we need human beings like you to enlighten our people.
I encourage everyone to watch "Best method for Interstellar travel"
I'd like to see your plans on dealing with dust particles moving at a good fraction of light speed relative to the ship.
Good point. Even at just half light-speed, impact with a one-microgramme dust particle is going to yield more than 11GJ of energy. Some form of multilayered shield, possibly?
Simple your spaceship' mass has increased (relativistic mass) compared to dust particle - so it would obliterate said particle (Voyagers still there 40 years later)!
While there still is dust particles you have to remember that is IS space and interstellar space is WAY more empty than the emptiness that we call space around earth is. But still, there are some(in the most generous sense of the word).
@@tomctutor, 1) from your rest perspective, the dust particle is the one with all the momentum, so it would obliterate you. 2) Voyager isn't traveling anywhere near relativistic speeds.
If you guys saw that tv show the boys in the opening episode you have the runner just PLOW through that woman on the side walk. It's a similar comparison. If you try to put 1 human through another human its bloody difficult. But add speed and you now have kinetic energy making you much more packed with mass and evenly focused and moving in one direction and boom he plowed right through her.
Same thing with a ship. As long as you have a good heads up display to avoid bigger things like planets and comets I think you would plow through smaller objects in space due to your mass and speed.
Kinetic energy is where its at. Throw a bullet through someone by hand. It's not going to do much. Now fire it from a gun and that lead piece will you right thru you.
I love how this comment section knows more about antimatter than the guy with a PhD in Positron Physics XD
M. Woller What do you mean???
Armchair physicists are the worst!
Duh
Awesome man I really appreciate you
😂
I would love to see a follow-on video about how you would navigate through space as you go faster and faster to avoid hitting solid matter which would destroy you. 1g constant acceleration doesnt sound much if you have a constant energy source but navigation safely would be tricky to say the least.
You nailed it. We are explorers...always have been. Going against that, is what is causing so much unrest. We don't have something to focus on as humanity....so we spend our time focusing on ourselves, and that's a bad idea. We are all flawed. Let's get back to exploration, and give humanity hope and something to focus on.
Incredible..and he explained all those in such a simplistic way i understood exactly everything he said. I have zero scientific background or self study on these matters.
i can't get over how profoundly useless and utterly pointless my job is.... selling lamp shades.
nneerraajj2903 ahaha.
Bruh 😂
What a lightbulb moment!
Rolan get off the stage!
Why don't you quit your job and do something good instead? Seriously? Unless you somehow already shackled yourself with responsibilities, the only limitation is your mind.
Everyone here is talking about the video, I'm just staring at the title wishing my last name was "Weed"
You do have a interesting name ''GOATPIXEL'' you don''t need ''weed''
oh thats good thats good
That is actually the first thing I saw when I clicked on this video^^ fking golden!
Goatweed !
LMAO
My takeaway: THAT'S why it was so critical on the Enterprise that the Antimatter Containment Field didn't fail. Thank goodness for Scotty.
all we needs is some dilithium crystals
And why they had an emergency system to jettison the core if it was losing containment.
Hello. Great video! Would love to help clarify for viewers: At 85% the speed of light, using antimatter propulsion, someone would arrive in 2.7 years, not 5. To us, of course, nothing can go faster than the speed of light.. which is a crazy thing considering that Alpha Centauri system is approximately 4.367 light years away. However, we have to consider relativity. On Earth, 'I see' (with my own eyes) that it takes 'you' 5 years to travel to Alpha Centauri. On the other hand, if 'you' are the one traveling to Alpha Centauri, only 2.7 years pass between the time you left Earth and arrived on Alpha Centauri. Gotta love time dilation.
However, it makes me wonder and it makes me anxious just by thinking that a person who took off to Alpha Centauri would just feel as if 2.7 yrs have passed while it would be 5 years for us. The gap widens again with our target being distant. So does it mean that the person on the spaceship is a futurist who can actually go forward in time?
I am not an astrophysicist just a novice but always curious and silly!
Well done. His conclusion answers a question I've always had: how can we travel beyond this galaxy when millennia would have passed on Earth? This only matters if you want to return to Earth. Multiple Earth-origin exploration civilizations could exist while being unable to have contact across the gulf of time separating them. The solution is simple, we exist independently, ontologically separated by time. So we accept that and say goodbye to Earth. Excellent.
@lordhaven111 The British populated Australia by sending people in British prisons there.
it's people like this, often behind the scenes (getting evicted by nervous landlords!) that are inching humanity towards fantastic possibilities. Sir, I salute you.
The first thing humans would do with antimatter is make bombs.
Google "4th generation nuclear weapons". Use of micrograms worth of antimatter as a trigger for miniature fusion bombs. You'll find a research paper and an informative youtube video. You bet they're after using antimatter for weapons production.
Antimatter is inherently fail dangerous. Not good for a bomb unless you make it on the battlefield as you need it.
@DeadFishFactory: See the paper. Magnetic bottles are old hat. The new way to store is a micrometer sized matrix of magnetic bottles, with trigger for controlled release. You only need half a microgram or so to trigger a .1kt - .25kt fusion bomb the size of a hand grenade.
No. First thing humans would do with antimatter is what they do with every new thing.... try to have sex with it.
Then they'll make a bomb.
Humans. We're fucking stupid. Literally and figuratively WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
...and the second thing humans will do with antimatter is make bigger bombs.
imagine flying in your little antimatter spacecraft in space and then more advanced human spacecraft overtakes you and they laugh at you from the window. or could they even do that i wonder?
scanjett lmao
scanjett lmao was thinking the same thing haha
Wouldnt the overtaking space craft be only possible because of incremental advances from the first space craft?
and then you both stop at the traffic lights
scanjett we cant even make autonomous vehicles work
Thanks for a very interesting, and even inspiring video! I think one thing that people don't take into account (and indeed, doesn't get mentioned often - even by professionals) is the simple and obvious fact that if (or when, as I prefer) we *_do_* make it to some other world with a living crew - whether that world is Proxima b or Mars - living conditions are not going to be favorable! We can only go there (again: wherever *_there_* is) expecting to either stay in orbit - using any available materials from asteroids, comets, etc. - to build larger orbiting platforms such as O'Neil cylinders, *_or_* we're going to have to build closed-off habitats down on the dirt, so to speak - either heavily shielded or domed structures above ground, or dug-in structures underground. Terraforming is *_not_* a light undertaking. If we go there for the long haul, we'll end up building a LOT of infrastructure before we even begin to consider it, as it could easily take millennia to accomplish (if it's even something we can do, really.) So I would deeply and greatly hope that *_all_* aspects of such a venture would be carefully considered - not piecemeal, by this company handling this, and that company dealing with that - but with *_all_* the companies, personnel, astronauts, etc., thinking through every bit of it, and considering every angle. To that end - and I know you may not think this is your 'area' - I truly believe the first long-term, if not permanent, colony we every build should be on the Moon. We've *_all_* got to get this right! The things we learn about living on other worlds - by living on the Moon first - will be nothing less than critical for the future of space travel - at *_any_* speed, and to *_any_* location. Thanks again. tavi.
> make it to some other world with a living crew - whether that world is Proxima b or Mars - living conditions are not going to be favorable!
Youre ignoring alien hotel chains.
we marvel with awe at the builders of ancient buildings & cities which we can't duplicate or replicate yet we seek to travel across the universe. dream on!
So let's imagine:
You take the Christmas M&M anti-matter matter shove it up the butt of a spaceship.
Go to Kepler 452B. Get their in 12.5 years. Upon arriving you discover amazingly some civilization is already there!
Surprisingly, over the radio they speak English, knowing your exact mission name and all crew on board.
After 300 years on earth, discovery of warp drive technology was made; orders of magnitude faster than light speed without the time dilation. And after 1,500 earth years, already entire colonies are on the planet, terraformed and has a vibrant zoology and colony.
after 1500 years hope humanity on earth is still alive though if we went out in space to settle colonies they might have a better chance at surviving then us here on earth
I was thinking the same thing. Send you on a probe and another probe is passing you that was built more advanced on earth because of the dialation. You arrive there to find humanity found a better faster way and already have skyscrapers being built on it when you arrive by your great great x150 grandson. crazy talk
That is bound to happen, so all the "aliens" "out there" will most likely be from earth and most likely all be within 50 years of age of each other, but due to time dilation be thousands or billions of years different in relative age - wrap your head around that!
That's certainly possible. But if it would keep you from going, then you're the wrong sort of person to be sending out on *_any_* spaceship - now or in some 'perfected future' that's never gonna happen! It's the same as people who say we shouldn't do anything about climate change *_yet_***, because the science isn't perfect ***_yet_***, so we should just wait and see. What if people never spread out from Africa, because one guy said, "You know, I think one day someone's gonna invent a better way to travel than just walking around lugging everything!" We don't have to know all the ***_answers_* now; we just have to *_start_* now. Besides, it would be very, very rude of them to pass us right by, start a colony, then wait for us to get there - all without even *_bothering_* to let us know anything. And they'd *_have_* to know we were out there. Pioneering is *_not_* for the feint of heart, for sure. I couldn't do it. Then again, it's not *_supposed_* to be! tavi.
Yeah, but it's job security for 12.5 years.
14:42 that awkward moment when you want to give a standing ovation but nobody else is standing so you chicken out.
One thing he never addressed and solved was the amount of matter that exists even at interstellar space, all of which you will be slamming into. And the faster you go, the more devastating they become.
Yeah, that alone makes this entire TED speech a complete fraud. Faster than light travel is only possible through wormholes.
I've wondered about the same thing. You are bound to hit some asteroids here and there. It's not just "smooth sailing".
Yup there would be a ton of problems that we would need to solve before this becomes remotely possible. Slamming into stuff, decelerating, maintaining human health and wellness, hibernation, protocols for encountering other intelligent life etc
ever heard of auto pilot?????
Yeah this is a problem that realistically seems to be one of the biggest concerns for me. I know there is a huge open space with nearly nothing between stars (and galaxies) but an asteroid the size of 1 mm that hit us at near-lightspeed would basically have the impact of a nuclear bomb i think. How do you prevent that? Sure, we can think of some new exotic matter or shielding that could withstand the impacts but eventually you have to turn the ships antimatter engine around to decelerate and when you do that, wouldn't you have the risk of impact again? Maybe you could shield both front and backside - dunno. They touched this concept in the new Star Wars movie
The best thing we can do is work on cryo pods and research more about induced hypothermia.
We humans are curious, creative and highly imaginative beings. If only the earth was united as one, we would have long become a type 2 civilisation and would have explored a lot through space.
We're not even at Type 1 yet. Type 2 is estimated to be about another 800 centuries in the future..... We are nowhere close to harnessing all the energy of our sun, and no amount of unity would have changed that.
> If only the earth was united as one,
The Nazis tried that. It didnt work out.
This is literally Luxemburg‘s biggest passion and interest - THE SPACE!!!
1) Like in the book "Tau Zero", you are forgetting that you need to flip around and start decelerating half-way to your final destination or you will simply fly past it very fast. This will probably increase travel time at least 2x and probably 10x (I believe time dilation is exponential). You will probably need some sort of actual shields to protect you from space dust and such in the direction of travel.
2) I believe the best "propulsion" comes from the "Philadelphia Experiment" and "Montauk Project". This is matter/people teleportation. I think I read somewhere that it is actually being used now to place people on the Moon and even Mars almost instantaneously. A ship like this can probably get to Alpha Centauri in days in several hops. In fact, I believe, we have already colonized planets around stars to at least 1000 LY WITHOUT time dilation. Look into it...
Noone gonna comment on this one?
I can understand this because I already watched Rick and Morty
people like you make me believe in humanity.
Note to self, listen to Mr. Weed.
This will ever remain a dream. One can be happy with the imagination, just that.
So a few questions I have about his time/distance numbers:
1) Is he accounting for deceleration? Or just a constant acceleration? Like would the burn be going the whole way or would they flip at halfway or so to begin deceleration? Would it have to be at the halfway point to accommodate the 1g limit?
2) If we're deciding to send people - what about a return journey?
3) Why not just send robots? Wouldn't they have much higher limits on acceptable gravity, what with no squishy bodies and all?
Man why is the crowd so dead I would be cheering hard for this guy
Somebody should have checked his math before presentation. I think he may have used rocket speed for his calculation because covering the first and second distances only take 38 and 116 days not months and years respectively.
How can this thing that we don't even understand be what helps us travel the fastest?
You can get to the Edge of the Universe in 30 years? So if you turned the ship around in, say, 10 years, you could come back and see the Earth several billion years in the future, assuming it still exists then? Mind blown...
Ryan Blais the sun would have probably decimated the solar system by then lol
It would take 46.7 billion light years to get to the edge of the universe. His math is wrong
30 on the ship bt billion years will pass on earth
'Decimated' means something was reduced by 10 percent. I think you meant 'Annihilated'.
Yeah makes no sense.... If its possible to bend Time and Space and travel somewhere else instantly then time shouldnt move at the Solar System... That ship should be able to back and forth using the same amount of time...
So I guess the Star Trek idea is off the table, if you want to boldly go where no one has gone before, it would mean never coming back. Or is anti-matter just not the way to go? Space folding? Artificial wormholes? Instantaneous travel from one point in space to another seems the only way to have interstellar travel and be able to do it without time debts. As a trekkie I'm a bit disappointed.
Ditto
NatalieCatLee Wormhole is space folding, but in order to make an artificial wormhole you would have to prove that wormholes are able to exist and recreate the conditions that make one. At this point they are in the high realm of sci fi.
Yes, I know. Unfortunately it's still scifi and the only place we'll be seeing it in our life times is in fiction. I don't know if you read the book series "Hyperion" by Dan Simmons, he has some interesting ideas about these subjects, great read.
I think it's also important to keep in mind that Physics is a relatively new field and though we may not understand it well enough now to travel fast, one day we may.
Our bigger problem is even if we come up with technology human meat bags have short life expectancies and they do not handle the high energy radiation discovered by voyager outside of the heliosphere. We are more suited to living under water than we are to living in space .... and we have hardly mastered this yet. after all we have zero colonies under water... why not?
This dude has to back it down a notch. We only just figured out the logistics for overnight shipping about a decade ago.
The way this guy just casually throws out there that we have technology that could allow a person to travel to the edge of the observable universe...
Regarding his question at the end of whether we want to be nomads again... I would gladly be a space nomad, so long as I had all the comforts. Or a space viking? It's a nice fantasy.
It is dishonest not to talk about the propellant mass needed for relativistic speeds. Even with antimatter.
lcdvasrm yes that is worrying
lcdvasrm maybe the ship can collect it from free atoms in space? I dunno
That method was illustrated in Cosmos by Carl Sagan; it is attractive in principle. You then have to find a way to transform that mass/energy captured into light directed backward...
If you try Bussard ramjet (collecting atoms for hydrogen fusion) you slow down more than accelerate. i.e. no way you can collect needed atoms, perhaps onboard turn them to antimatter etc. on the way - you should still carry the mass like ordinary rockets do OR get stream of propellant somehow from somewhere for a very long time. Energy of this received propellant would diminish as the ship would get closer to lightspeed. Not to mention all stuff the ship'd hit...
This guy is a fraud.
He could've as well counted how many kg's of food needs to be stored for 50 years voyage ignoring all other problems !
It's also not possible to reach high relativistic velocities, even with an anti-matter photon drives (which this researcher does not propose, he proposes conversion to charged particles first). You'd be lucky to get to 10% to 15% c with this engine. Which is pretty damn respectable. You'd be tooting around the solar system very nicely at those speeds. As long as you don't hit anything. But interstellar with that technology would require suspended animation or life extension.
I really appreciate the work that you guys are doing, and I understand that when you discussed the time needed to travel to the edge of the observable universe, you just wanted to qualitatively illustrate the vast distances possible to travel at an acceleration of 1 g. But it is actually impossible for us to travel to the edge of the universe even at the speed of light because the universe is expanding at a greater speed because of the presence of dark energy. Just wanted to clarify this so that people do not develop wrong perceptions.
> universe is expanding at a greater speed
Then you need a really fast ship...
It surprises me that people think a mechanical machine could last that long without falling apart, even with educated and experienced mechanics.
Why should we explore space?
Because it’s f*cking AWESOME!!!
Great presentation and nice to know that someone is working on this but I can see a problem which does not seem to have been discussed. If you are able to perfect the technology and travel at close to the speed of light, if you hit something the size of a grain of sand, that will be enough to destroy your space ship.
You know this how? Lol 😂
A very real problem that they've already had to tackle with the ISS and space probes. I know the ISS uses an orbital debris shield, but travelling interstellar at light speed poses it to be a much greater problem.
A force field around the ship. Dont you read sci-fi?
@@UTINNI_36 Horrible take to be honest. F=MA
"If we go at 1 g aceel we get there in 3.5 weeks ..." However, did I miss him discuss deceleration? Not only do our theoretical explorers have to factor in decel, but as so many others pointed out, all life support mass and propellant mass would have to be considered.
Realistically, there can be no interstellar travel unless/until some means of FTL is discovered and safely applied.
I feel bad for the next planet we find to live on..
StuuDude well its not living so it doesnt matter and its only 1 of trillions and trillions and trillions of planets in the infinite universe, so sure feel bad
We can never travel even close to speed of light because the mass traveling reaches infinity based on e=mc2 formula.
Great argument
Why explore space?
Because that’s what we do
Maybe we should prioritise differently
12:30
Is the calculation to Alpha Centauri with or without slowing down?
Silt Strider
With, I think. He goes on to say that 5 yrs pass on the spacecraft and 9 on the Earth.
Silt Strider
Iirc at 1g acceleration you reach 95% c in about 360 days, so that's 2 years to speed up and slow down.
A coffee break and three other stops with a short layover
A very good point, no one even considered that here but you. Half way the spaceship would have to turn around 180 degrees and reverse thrusters, still 1g though so maybe his calculations out by a factor of 2x.
I like how he doesn't mention deceleration... that greatly extends the time required as you have to slow down by aiming your thrusting apparatus in the opposite direction presumably with even more thrust and g forces than the acceleration if you don't want to start deceleration at the halfway point.
Not if you bend space you smuck
Everyone here has a PHD hahahahah
It is amazing that Elijah Wood found time to focus on space travel after his acting career
We explore for survival or profit. Not out of curiosity. Humans like comfort, and repetition. We fear the unknown and tend to be practical. Individuals that stray from the pack, break the mold, make their own way or are driven by curiosity usually don't live long. How can scientists be so romantic when it comes to space travel but so pragmatic about most everything else?
Now this was excellent, finally some discutions about time dialation and this is very profound.
Interstellar travel might occur without intentionally trying to do so. Primitive man migrated to six of the seven continents on Earth not be intentionally traveling to another continent but by building another village over the next hill. Likewise, if we just build Stanford Torus's, Bernal Sphere's and O'Neill Cylinders out of asteroids and comets then we would migrate to nearby stars without even trying to do so. There would be no issue of being outpaced by faster technology as the habitats you live on would be your destination in the first place and we already know there are interstellar resources as an extrasolar asteroid recently passed through our solar system. One asteroid can build and power a lot of city scale habitats.
I’d volunteer to be sent out, never to return
I'd only go if I was promised I wouldn't have to return. ;)
The universe is expanding, even at near light speed travel, mankind can't reach outside the local group.
So the example of reaching "the edge of the universe" is a bit strange if he haven't invented a real warp drive :)
Jörgen no sense what you said, the expansion on the univers is not the speed of light more of the time, so you can go to other galaxies out of local, on any time soon
The expression "hasn't been figured out yet" should never be used when making predictions. If it hasn't been figured out yet, we necessarily have no way of knowing that it will ever be figured out at all, i.e., we can't know if it's even physically possible. We can imagine lots things that are physically impossible, that doesn't mean that we could ever "figure them out".
Pabloxd123 - Taking relativistic effects into account, the trip to go further than our milky way could be accomplished in 20,000 light-years from the perspective of an observer on Earth. If someone attempted it, you would never hear from them in your life time.
Jörgen I thought you ride along with the expansion of the universe so the more outer edge you go the faster you’d move, along with the expansion? We currently on earth are indeed moving away from other distant galaxies as we speak, in relative to them we might be moving at the speed of light, right? Correct me if I’m wrong.
That is a theory based on some highly debatable proof. If you take a close look at the proof then you'll see some holes appearing. There is a part of the scientific community that thinks that it isn't expanding or at least not as fast as they think.
He’s such a hunk! I understand all the science he’s talking about. I have four degrees. It’s just nice at my age to see a hunky guy helping to educate younger people.
He doesn't look that great to me what are you talking about.
Great name. Better degree. Absolute legend.
There is no choice. We either move into space or our species becomes extinct. The sun will not last forever so the only way our species can survive is to go somewhere new and to be prepared to move on from there after a while. Even all this eventually becomes moot as the universe does have a limited life. But, we have got to at least try. Is there anything more important than the survival of our species? I don't think so.
Graeme Lastname we gonna die for asteroids before the sun stop working
Pabloxd123 Asteroids can at least be redirected or intercepted, and we can see them coming. Gamma ray bursts are more of a real danger because you can never see them coming, even if the Earth is much less likely to get hit by these.
true, but you cant do this on this years (sorry bad english)
There's not really a reason why we couldn't do this over the long term. Of course, we'll have to leave eventually. The sun is already at half of its life expectancy. It'd be a shame to let all Life die because we don't take its worth seriously. Preserving Life in the long term implies developing space exploration as much as possible. It is a moral obligation.
"Already" at half? That's still soooooo much time we have. I don't get why many humans now want to rush in a period of a few decades/centuries to explore asap other planets so we can save our species. We have at least a billion years to go until the sun's expansion will be too big. A billion years is so incredible long, that if evolution would have started a million years later, we still would say we have more than enough time before the sun dies. So actually the next million years (and even much longer) we can take it easy and no need to rush.
Given the chance, I would definitely embark on something like that, it’s a once in a lifetime opportunity, imagine that, being among the first humans in another system, galaxy.. if many worlds are conquered over a timespan, one day humans can become the first (maybe) sentient beings connected by multiple interstellar - planetary communities. That’s a sentence you don’t say everyday lol
i’ll go with you
Imagine millions years later, all good planets in Milky Way colonized by humans without any space bending stuff. Тraveling faster than light impossible, thus there won't be any interstellar community, All colonies will on their own like separate civilizations with own history and culture. They will only receive messages from other colonies sent. hundreds or thousands years before. And eventually they will forget what planet humans came from or maybe some civilizations will not.
Pawel Zybulskij FTL Travel is possible. Not velocities but speed. Wormholes and warp technology.
Pawel Zybulskij maybe that’s how we got here and we are in a 10.000 year dejavú?! Von Däniken tends to believe that... (were the gods cosmonauts)
Who says FTL is impossible? Einstein? He was wrong. According to Bell's theorem (proven by Aspect et al 1981) either FTL messaging is possible OR the universe is self-aware down to each and every particle
Maybe that already happened, that's how we got here, and the flood made us forget...
Halo
Enjoy and take care of this planet.
It's our only home and always will be.
The sheer numbers and distances is mind boggling to say the least.
By the time we have the technology to become "nomads" in outer space we would already be extinct either by wars , climate change or by some other extinction event.
You cannot compare being "nomadic" on earth to being a "nomad" out there.There's huge hurdles to overcome.
Being nomads is in our DNA 🧬
"Do you want to be nomads again?" - The movie Passenger comes to mind
I'm high, wondering about this question, looked it up, and this guys name is perfect!
An hour before I thought I was a serious man. Now I'm watching a guy who's name is Weed talking about interstellar travel to the end of the universe that he believes to be possible by an antimatter drive that he started doing in the office before he moved to the nuclear fallout shelter and he seems to be quite reasonable to me. Should I worry about myself?
The universe is a strange place, but life is even stranger, stranger. :) tavi.
Is he trolling us ? It takes (93 Gly) 92936344969,19946 YEARS FOR LIGHT ITSELF to even reach the OBSERVABLE universe, how is it possible for us to reach the EDGE of the universe with a spacecraft in a LIFETIME ?
@@ΓιώργοςΖαρου time dilation
@Smruti Smarak Thank you for replying. But that means we will experience time slower from someone who stays in the Earth right?
Just solve the problem of why telomeres shorten and have 1000 lifetimes.
I can't believe I'm only just seeing this video now 2 years later, this relates to my book I've wrote, and this ties in with the Fermi paradox, kind of solves it really. But it justifies my book entirely on why we need to survive as a human race, although Ive said in my book we need to travel. We need to sort out earth.
In short you are a legend Ryan Weed, and you have explained the Fermi paradox.
Did he mention Fermi Paradox here, might have not sure?
When I was 14 years old in the year 2000, I posed a question to a guy giving a speech at a local university about 3D printing. Now, that vision has come true. As such, I believe that we will one day build teleportation devices for living beings, food, etc which will (on a basic level) be 3D printers.
I want 4d printers
Why does no one ever bring up the fact that it does not matter how fast you travel, you can't travel in a straight line..... eventually you would hit a planet or debris.
Two words
Mass Ratio
Four words.
Words, I have the best words
Mass increases with speed, no?
😂😂 the man at 1:58 already knew he was in for a long ridiculous talk
I literally came to the comment section to see if anyone talks about this guy lmao... Nice!!!! (y)
No... He's just camrea shy 😦
It's because nobody laughed at the joke hahaha. Facepalm
well let's face it, anytbody that re-ups for yet-another a "TED TALK" knows the punishment they are gonna get
Similar mood to the guy at 11:48
Try Transubstantiation! That’s the key to faster than light travel, because there is no mass associated with craft and occupants. If you raise the vibration of an object, it disappears, and vice versa. The craft can be made to disappear, then reappear at the chosen destination. Virtually instantly.
As a Trekie, the notion of intra and interstellar travel fascinates me. But the distances are so immense and the effect of time dilation so extreme that it puts a whole new twist on the term: "Live long and prosper." Man, you gotta REALLY live long to prosper on that flight. Unfortunately, I just don't see us cracking the code unless we can figure out how to cheat time itself.
But I absolutely believe asteroid mining will be a thing in this century. I do wonder if a large influx of precious metals will drive down the value to a point where the law of diminishing returns will kick in and make the effort not worth the trip but I'll be honest, I got a B in economics so my concern could be way off base on that one. Cool talk.
So basically the first person to ever travel at the speed of light is going on a suicide mission.
Seems like it
Life is a suicide mission.
*if everything goes well, we can have the first pictures of Proxima b in 2060, hopefully sooner if something faster than light sails is created or discovered*
There's nothing faster than light though
Technically, laser propulsion of light sails could easily out accelerate an antimatter drive so long as the light sail could still be targeted by the laser which brings to mind the concept of laser relay stations to establish a highway in space. Remember reflecting light doubles the momentum you receive and with sails you do not have to carry the energy source not the propellent mass.
Callum Macleod he didn’t say faster than light he said faster than light sails a light sail travels at 20% the speed of light. Also things can travel faster than the speed of light. Everything past the edge of the visible universe has accelerated to faster than the speed of light hence why we can’t see it
Zach Smith which things can travel faster than the speed of light?
Julio Giron nothing can travel faster than the speed of light in a vacuum but the universe itself is expanding faster than the speed of light causing everything within the universe to slowly accelerate to infinite speeds, everything on the outer edge of the universe is expanding faster than the speed of light so we can never see it again because the objects themselves are traveling too fast for the light to catch up to us
Even if we have anti-matter propellant, how to maintain 1G acceleration when the spaceship's speed reaches near light speed? Wouldn't it take almost infinite amount of energy?
Or even "slowing down" before arrival lol
What about inertia?
No. In the ships rest frame, for one g acceleration, you always need the same amount of fuel per unit time. However, seen from the earth's frame of reference, the ship will accelerate less and less the closer it comes to c.
Yes, the faster you go the more antimater/matter per second would be required to maintain the 1 g acceleration.
@@WackyAmoebatrons CORRECT.
Exploration is one of life's purpose, it shall be done synergistically while helping people in need here on earth (for example build housing for poor people living in extreme environments, hot or cold, to help perfect housing designs for other planet). To travel light speed we will have to travel as informations in a laser beam which can trigger matter in an other planet to form nanobots which in turn form robots. The next step is then to upload ourselves as informations into them. AI will be us uploading ourselves into avatar robots (transcendance). As for spacetime, I understand it as the perception of it to be relative. Time is based on the rotation of planets, so travelling light speed won't change planetary movements but change our perception of time on earth, which will come back to normal during the return trip.
Buenas noches , todo con mucha lógica y muy natural y sobre todo muy interesante la informacion que habla el Sr:Ryan Weed. volver a empezar la vida de nuevo .
80% light speed
nuff said
Is he proposing producing anti-matter on Earth and storing it in the spaceship or is he proposing creating the anti-matter while flying? At one point, he was talking about using radioactive decay to create anti-matter. If he brings that radiation source with him, he won't get any more energy than using the radiation source directly as a source of energy. You need to hold back enough fuel to stop the spacecraft when you reach your destination.
its 2020.. where's all this stuff today
The people who control the money are too busy trafficking children and blackmailing each other.
Those last words both gave smile and tears
Just glad someone is thinking along these lines.
7:09 guy be like: "daamn what am I gonna do now?"
It's 2019 and he said it would be about two years for that small satellite to get into orbit. Anyone have any news on how this project is going?
It's going okay.
So, if we send someone on a near light travel to another star... won't we beat them to it? To them it would take years... but to us, we would have enough time to figure out faster then light travel and get there before they ever do.
That''s like inventing a race car after race has started, and then winning in that car.
That would work onlty if new physics allows us to build the winning car.
Yup! Bending time space would allow us to get there quicker then someone going near light speed travel by leaps and bounds and we would have 150 years to beat them there.
Someone travelling at speed of light is already going to reach there instantly (per their ref frame.) If I am second traveller that starts with new faster physics, i must be at both the start and destination at the same time before my travel starts, or in other words, I must be travelling back in time too? That sound correct?
supergps2000 did you watch this video? Someone traveling 80 percent the speed of light with current technology will take just under a decade to reach our nearest star. People on earth would observe those travelers as taking 150 years to get there. The travelers will experience time around them speed up while they remain un-effected. They will personally experience 8 years of time while everything 80 percent the speed of light slower then them experience 150 years. They will get to there destination 150 years later but would only experience 8 of those years. They are traveling through space so fast that they also travel through time at an accelerated rate, hints Time Space. Idk how else to explain it. We have 150 years here on earth to beat them there by learning to bend time space and get there in just days without experiencing that same time dilation. Hell, they might be arriving to a future human settlement.
*The gentleman did not discuss Dimension Hopping. When we arrived we were being visited a million of years previously. I believe the little saucer things come as cargo in massive mother ships and they are not concerned about travelling at what is called the "speed of light" they travel inter-dimensionally. The little saucer things are for local travel once they get here*
While I think all interesting propellant technologies should be explored, there will always be huge problems with moving quickly through space.. only a small fraction of which are:
1- time spent (you also have to account for slowing down halfway to the target for 1g travel)
2- time spent back home relative to spacecraft
3- micrometeoroids and other collisions
Because of just these few challenges.. *moving* through space is not likely going to be the way we end up exploring the galaxy... maybe some nearby stars until better tech is discovered.. but I doubt much more than that. I personally am confident that warping space or taking advantage of windows we don't know about yet is possible, and eventually something like that will be the way to explore space in any significant manner beyond our solar system. Definitely keep moving forward with whatever you have though... it's not like propulsion is the only thing a technology like that could be a game-changer for.
I like the idea of "folded space" but the energies required are enormous. Thats assuming it can be done.
I just watched 3 videos about interstellar travel, and in each of them they mentioned a different vehicle as the fastest thing humans have ever created.
And you also created Avatar?
By any chance, was one of the other two a manhole cover flung by a nuclear bomb buried underground? Though not necessarily a vehicle, it is the fastest object we've ever created (even if done so unintentionally).
Anti-matter: It wouldn't matter.
"Exploring is in out DNA" and Neil Degrasse Tyson bangs his head
Talk about solving serious problems..these geniuses need to be given everything possible to put their minds to work. I wish I was a billionaire.
I would imagine the concept of PERPETUAL MOMENTUM would be a very good way to get high speed into outer space. But it could not be manned because we would have to keep our fingers crossed NOT TO HIT AN ASTEROID AND DESTROY THE CRAFT. So Perpetual Momentum, Sir Isaac Newton at the wheel
Making a lot of antimatter is a fantasy. Travel to the stars is possible only via multi generational ships if those ships can cruise at 5% to 10% the speed of light.
Finally! Someone thinking practically!
As of now mass producing antimatter is fantasy just like going to the moon was 100 years ago.
with actual tecnology yes
and who are you to say it is possible ONLY via whatever? just because stuff hasn't been invented yet doesn't mean it will not be. would humans who lived 500 years ago think radio or television were possible? what will the people 500 years from now think of us? "they thought FTL travel was impossible" could be one thing. ("they couldn't provide drinking water to everyone" could be another)
1138thz “is fantasy” is possible the funniest and most short sighted comment made about space exploration technology I’ve ever heard. You are literally saying the words my great grandpa said about making it to the moon. Can’t you see?
This guy looks like a young Rodney Mckay :)
10m50s "4 billion people on the surface of the planet don't have access to the internet"
They're the lucky ones.
I think we will learn to compress space in front of a craft and expand space behind a craft and go much faster than light speed .
What about slowing down? Arriving at 75% the speed of light (taking away the actual other problems of protecting the craft) you still have to slow down enough to get off - That deceleration would also be limited to 1g - so - double the time?
CORRECT its been stated twice already.
If the light from edge of the universe take billions of light years to get to earth, how does a speed that is slower than light speed make it quicker?
We haven't seen the edge of the universe yet since it's traveling away from us faster than the speed of light. I believe what he was trying to communicate was the relative time dilation as a craft begins to near the speed of light, people in the craft should experience less time passing than the people left behind on earth and as the craft nears the edge of the observable universe, people in the craft may have experienced as little as 30 years whereas earth experienced 13 and a half trillion years. According to Einstein, the closer to the speed of light you get, the more your relative time dilates. So, relatively, time may come to a standstill for you as you near the speed of light as time goes on like normal down here on earth.
It takes billions of years in OUR time reference, but for the photon, it takes no time at all. If the photon had a conscious mind like ours, it would have experienced to have arrived on Earth instantly, because at light speed time does not pass. The edge-of-universe spaceship would experience 30 years, instead of no time at all (like the photon would) because it would be travelling at 0.99999999c, and not 1c.
@@bennemann hence the little known theory that all the electrons in the universe are in fact, just one electron, interacting with itself in a place with no time.
I think it's called the one-electron universe, look it up.
higher dimensional interaction
We wouldn't be going at the speed of light for a little bit until we pass it. What he is saying is that we are accelerating at a continuous speed for as long as it takes us to get to the edge of the universe and since there is no friction in space, we would just keep going at an accelerating speed.
How about populating the Solar System first? Ya gotta walk before ya run...Just sayin'.
Terraforming and atmospheric manipulation to make it suitable for humans is going to be way way way harder than coming up with a way to quickly travel to a planet that is similar to Earth. Not to mention, the completely different planet or moon gravity.
@@prashantramachandran2153 I don't know about harder, but definitely more labor intensive and time consuming.
@@prashantramachandran2153 Not necessarily. A tesla tube magnetic field could be created to protect prospective planets by placing a satellite at the L1 Lagrange point between the planet and the sun. This would prevent the new atmosphere from being stripped away by deflecting solar wind just like the Earth's magnetosphere. Genetically modified fungus or bacteria could be used to absorb the brine, CO2, and Perchlorate and produce useful substances that may one day sustain an atmosphere. We already have naturally-occurring bacteria on Earth that can survive in a nuclear reactor. It's not beyond comprehension that we may be able to accomplish terraforming without bending space-time, especially considering Mars has only 28.4% the surface area of Earth.
most of the solar system isn’t habitable due to the atmospheric properties and terrain of Venus, Mercury and Pluto. Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune and Uranus are all uninhabitable since they are made of gas and dangerous materials.
Here is why,
But the crux of the problem is the same for all, you still need a better propulsion system. Any colony we build in our solar system will be dependent on earth or require massive construction. You can't wait 5 years for a supply to come to Jupiter moons or 10 years to Pluto. Mars takes six month only if the planets are aligned right otherwise 2 years.
Now if you can supply Jupiter's moons in two months than you have a propulsion system that could take you to interstellar, and you can start building a huge spaceship in space one you have a good propulsion system.
People think ftl travel is impossible.. they once thought flight or breaking the sound barrier to be impossible too
This isn't faster than light travel. It's talking about time dilation, meaning the people on the ship don't age as fast at the people on earth.
I do believe that our dreams will come true. We look at the stars and hope to reach them so our best minds which have ever lived and live now have worked together to build hopefully a future for mankind in interstellar space. Sadly we will not be around to see it.
We have to start moving at light speed to interstellar travel. So get materials to harness the sun's power from other planets, bring it back and build a space ship like ship. Or an element that uses/manipulates the force of gravity as energy, positive or negative. Gravity is everywhere in space.
Travelling to another Galaxy would need a time machine , which in science isn't so far fetched if you can harness the power of a blackhole.