DXO PureRAW 2 vs Topaz DeNoise - Which program is the best? 1:1 Results and Comparison

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 26

  • @FabianFoppNaturephotography
    @FabianFoppNaturephotography  2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Here you can test both programs for free and buy them at the Black-Friday special price (valid as long as, affiliate links):
    Topaz: www.topazlabs.com/black-friday/ref/901/
    DXO PureRaw: tidd.ly/3OwB01k

  • @wawanbalik
    @wawanbalik ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can Fabian or someone else please let me know the species of bird at 7:00 (after the Elephant image)? I have some similar shots from Masai Mara and trying to confirm. Thank you.

  • @DuckMisty
    @DuckMisty 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Topaz works nicely into my workflow with Lightroom. I mainly shoot birds so almost all of my photos are cropped. I import, crop, denoise and then edit. The crop before denoise means that I only denoise the smaller file so it's faster that way. Noise reduction has to be performed before editing otherwise your sliders are going to be enhancing the noise.

    • @FabianFoppNaturephotography
      @FabianFoppNaturephotography  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for your comment 😊 I still prefer to do rough adjustments before denoising, to me the result looked better (in terms of colors, as shown in the other video)

  • @KoenKooi
    @KoenKooi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dxo pl6 has a bug with denoising where it will give a purple cast of you’re using the Neural Engine in your mac, switching to the GPU fixes that. Pureraw might have a similar issue. DxO said they are working on a fix.

  • @petemulhearn7787
    @petemulhearn7787 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Installed the app on my Dell with Intel i7 16GB Ram and Windows 11. Couldn't get it to open. Fortunately I'd only downloaded the free trial version. If I'm paying $80 for an app I would expect it to work without having to start searching Google just to get it to open.

    • @FabianFoppNaturephotography
      @FabianFoppNaturephotography  ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s weird. Did you find the reason? Otherwise I would contact the support, they seem to be quite responsive

    • @petemulhearn7787
      @petemulhearn7787 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FabianFoppNaturephotography The installation appeared proceed ok but when I clicked on the app a small blank window opened and then closed after a few seconds. I have, over the years, downloaded many Adobe apps to Windows and Apple machines without any problems. If I buy a new car I expect to go to the dealer, pay my money and drive it away. If I won't start I won't buy it. Same with software. I expect to pay my money, install the app and use it immediately.

    • @FabianFoppNaturephotography
      @FabianFoppNaturephotography  ปีที่แล้ว

      Well, this could also be an issue with a graphic driver or something else. It’s not comparable to buying a car (more like: if the bluetooth connection between your new car an phone doesn’t work (but it does with other phones)

    • @ACNH_streamer
      @ACNH_streamer ปีที่แล้ว

      Did you check the graphics requirements before getting it? Because much like a car, I'd be damn sure to check it would even fit in my garage before buying it.

  • @TheWildlifeGallery388
    @TheWildlifeGallery388 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I use DXO PureRaw - then send it to ON1 for processing - every now & then it will over-sharpen an image - in those cases I delete that file and just use ON1 - Denoise where I can control the sharpening, I could never get Lightroom to work for me

  • @georgesaguna
    @georgesaguna 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not even I expected it. Don’t rush into paying for pure raw2 as I learnt the hard way. In my case I bought it mainly for the de-noising as it looked impressive. After sending about a 1000 shots to be taking care off (it took about 4 hours) from lightroom the images came back nearly a full stop darker then when edited. I tried to send the images un edited to PR2 directly from lightroom and same result. I tried to open it directly on PR2 and same result. I have been in contact with them ever since and there is no solution till today.

    • @FabianFoppNaturephotography
      @FabianFoppNaturephotography  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ou, that doesn’t sound good! Was it only with one camera model?

    • @georgesaguna
      @georgesaguna 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@FabianFoppNaturephotography that’s one thing I have to try to be honest as I only have canon cameras but I will try photos from some other equipment.

    • @georgesaguna
      @georgesaguna ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FabianFoppNaturephotography Just an other update, I tried to get in touch with DXO and their customer care is seriously lacking. I have been in contact with them since the start of December and they dont seem to bedoing much about it. I asked if I can get rembursed but according to them that goes against their policey.

  • @winngh
    @winngh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love pureraw2 but it give black images when I use my Nvidia card which is extremely fast compared to Cpu which can take about 5 minutes for a single picture depending on the complexity of the image.

  • @hepgeoff
    @hepgeoff 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice comparison, thanks!

  • @alfrid5473
    @alfrid5473 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great review
    Thank you for sharing.
    Short time ago Adobe has improveed Lightroom's noise reduction.
    I wonder if it is better than Topaz or DXO PureRaw, it it is.... That would make everything easier and shorter (ans cheaper)

  • @jonzmoviebar7580
    @jonzmoviebar7580 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I tried both, and I might say that I much prefer Topaz Denoise on RAW method (the others Topaz methods are all flawed). What most people do as a mistake is they open Topaz within Lightroom Classic which then convert the file into a TIFF files and therefore lose all the dynamic data, the trick is to open the raw images in Topaz standalone progam first and apply the filter. I get much more details back and noise reduction with RAW method. I found DxO (especially DeepPrime method) to interpret hairs or feather with gross brush strokes as if it was a paintover, which looks to me unnatural, I can even see them in your examples.

    • @FabianFoppNaturephotography
      @FabianFoppNaturephotography  ปีที่แล้ว

      I tried that, but I prefered the output I got from tiff files. C1 is (imho) just doing a way better job with handling the colors than topaz