This is a great find..looks very good. For me, it would be even more elegant with blue(d) hands on a dark blue strap or mesh bracelet. But none the less, a good choice for an inexpensive nice looking piece. Lack of sapphire is not a deal breaker on a dress watch and such thin profile makes is a very good choice for such occasions.
I love the (Rolex) design of the watch. It is very elegant. The only thing letting the luxury feeling down is the large Berny branding on the watchface imo. A logo would have worked better. Thanks!😊
Nice, but with 10/20€ more you can buy an automatic with a Seiko movement. This one has a quartz movement and is only water-resistant to 3 atmospheres.
Is automatic movement considered a better choice over quartz? Not that you mean NH35 which would make completely different watch. I guess at this price point it's more about watch as a whole, maybe even about case and how it looks. Movement of a cheap watch doesn't really matters as long as it keeps time and isn't terribly off. WR on a dress watch is important for who, like, Agent 007 who comes to party and jumps into a pool to escape an enemy? Most of people don't care as long as watch isn't damaged by an accidental water droplet when washing hands - that's my take on a dress watch resisting a water ingress. So to say - just add another eur20 and get even nicer watch. Well, another eur50 more and it's even nicer) You know where it ends (rather, doesn't).
Looks great, nice dress watch ⌚
agreed
Nice watch! Thanks for the review. 👍
Thanks for watching!
The dial is very nice, and the case looks great too-only the back is unimpressive. Considering get the teal one. Thanks for review
thanks for watching
This is a great find..looks very good. For me, it would be even more elegant with blue(d) hands on a dark blue strap or mesh bracelet.
But none the less, a good choice for an inexpensive nice looking piece. Lack of sapphire is not a deal breaker on a dress watch and such thin profile makes is a very good choice for such occasions.
I like it this thin. It looks even better in real.
I love the (Rolex) design of the watch. It is very elegant. The only thing letting the luxury feeling down is the large Berny branding on the watchface imo. A logo would have worked better. Thanks!😊
@@BarnOwl61 They have a similar 2690m model with arabic numerals. Same case and just the logo but without the pattern on the dial..
Yes, you are right. On the other hand the Berny record isn't so much noticeable from a like 30-50 cm distance
Nice, but with 10/20€ more you can buy an automatic with a Seiko movement. This one has a quartz movement and is only water-resistant to 3 atmospheres.
But you won't get this slim automatic. IMO, it lacks sapphire, the quartz with small hand is OK here.
Is automatic movement considered a better choice over quartz? Not that you mean NH35 which would make completely different watch.
I guess at this price point it's more about watch as a whole, maybe even about case and how it looks. Movement of a cheap watch doesn't really matters as long as it keeps time and isn't terribly off. WR on a dress watch is important for who, like, Agent 007 who comes to party and jumps into a pool to escape an enemy? Most of people don't care as long as watch isn't damaged by an accidental water droplet when washing hands - that's my take on a dress watch resisting a water ingress.
So to say - just add another eur20 and get even nicer watch. Well, another eur50 more and it's even nicer) You know where it ends (rather, doesn't).