ขนาดวิดีโอ: 1280 X 720853 X 480640 X 360
แสดงแผงควบคุมโปรแกรมเล่น
เล่นอัตโนมัติ
เล่นใหม่
We have done the route 420 to Sutton stn and it is a very nice route
Nice video (LT194, LT466)
Brilliant Visual!
Awesome visual!
The crawley bus stop
Tbh they should extend the 420 to Morden via Rose Hill, Bishopsford Road and Wandle Road to replace the 718 when it goes
Doubt tfl would permit a non tfl route that far in to the boundary I don't think it would make sence
@@fin720s 702 🤷🏻
@@TheTransportSpotter that runs as a coach though and it runs quite a bit out of london and also can be used to milk alot of money out of tourists
Actually it would be a decent idea to extend this bus to croydon
@Chiltern Transport Productions Very true and based, Sadly TFL Would want to get more money. So if they did that they would a quite big amount of cash
Nice
I'm surprised people in Sutton willingly get this route
wdym it's a great route
@@LuperSoop69 yeah but why get a bus thats less frequent and more expensive than a tfl one if ur travelling entirely within tfl territory
@@Suliplayz5264 1) 420 is 3x quicker between Sutton & Banstead than the S12) it's the same fare between Banstead & Sutton as TfL's flat fare so it's worth it3) you clearly don't know what you're talking about
@@LuperSoop69 yeah i guess ur right, having been on the 420 between sutton and banstead recently, i can say ur correct
Inconvenience has been caused to your journey.
The weed number
The same as the 273
No. They are completely different. 420 goes to the north of Crawley (and to Sutton), 273 goes to the south of Crawley (and to Brighton).
D
GreaterLondonBuses you should start doing outer London routes
![[Full Route Visual] Brighton and Hove Route 5B: University of Sussex - Hangleton](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/cHLkuPRR0D8/mqdefault.jpg)
We have done the route 420 to Sutton stn and it is a very nice route
Nice video (LT194, LT466)
Brilliant Visual!
Awesome visual!
The crawley bus stop
Tbh they should extend the 420 to Morden via Rose Hill, Bishopsford Road and Wandle Road to replace the 718 when it goes
Doubt tfl would permit a non tfl route that far in to the boundary I don't think it would make sence
@@fin720s 702 🤷🏻
@@TheTransportSpotter that runs as a coach though and it runs quite a bit out of london and also can be used to milk alot of money out of tourists
Actually it would be a decent idea to extend this bus to croydon
@Chiltern Transport Productions Very true and based, Sadly TFL Would want to get more money. So if they did that they would a quite big amount of cash
Nice
I'm surprised people in Sutton willingly get this route
wdym it's a great route
@@LuperSoop69 yeah but why get a bus thats less frequent and more expensive than a tfl one if ur travelling entirely within tfl territory
@@Suliplayz5264
1) 420 is 3x quicker between Sutton & Banstead than the S1
2) it's the same fare between Banstead & Sutton as TfL's flat fare so it's worth it
3) you clearly don't know what you're talking about
@@LuperSoop69 yeah i guess ur right, having been on the 420 between sutton and banstead recently, i can say ur correct
Inconvenience has been caused to your journey.
The weed number
The same as the 273
No. They are completely different. 420 goes to the north of Crawley (and to Sutton), 273 goes to the south of Crawley (and to Brighton).
D
Awesome visual!
GreaterLondonBuses you should start doing outer London routes