The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt - 1080p vs 2K vs 4K Graphics Comparison 4K

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ย. 2024
  • The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt - 1080p vs 2K vs 4K Graphics Comparison 4K
    Any ideas and suggestions about future videos are welcomed. Please write me on my channel.

ความคิดเห็น • 766

  • @yusufbiricik3131
    @yusufbiricik3131 8 ปีที่แล้ว +983

    do you know whats ironic
    I watching this video on 360p

    • @Q36BN
      @Q36BN 7 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      You know what's ironic?
      The uploader of this video claims he is comparing 1080p vs. 2K vs. 4K.
      Where in fact he is actually comparing 1080p vs. 2.5K, vs. UHD.

    • @crazytwiggy7020
      @crazytwiggy7020 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      2560x1440 is 2.5k gaming.
      1920x1080 is 2k gaming
      takes 4 1080 for 4k 2x2 = 4
      takes 4 4 k for 8 k gaming 2x4 = 8

    • @brky5877
      @brky5877 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      and still notice the difference.

    • @neongooroo
      @neongooroo 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      2560x1440 is 2k -_-
      1920x1080 is just 1080 or fhd. Noone calls it 1k or 2k

    • @neongooroo
      @neongooroo 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ten-eighty is easy to say, not like forteen-frorty or twenty one-sixty.

  • @imacomputer101
    @imacomputer101 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1573

    4k, perfect for when you play a game in 80% zoom mode.

    • @Faithful-Preservation
      @Faithful-Preservation 7 ปีที่แล้ว +105

      Or if you plan on buying a a 32 inch monitor for up close gaming, or if you plan on buying a 60+ inch tv for mid range view gaming.
      4K resolutions are the bomb if you have the screensize.

    • @JL-dance
      @JL-dance 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      just hook it up on your tv, works almost as good as a monitor plus its free (if you have one)

    • @gomezalejandrog
      @gomezalejandrog 7 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      which is only applicable to those who can afford a $7,000 gaming setup anyway. Which is probably a few people.
      It's just not worth it right now unless you have a six figure job or high five figure job.
      I just spent 3k on my laptop (could've opted for gtx 1080 ti SLI) but I'm just not making enough to justify spending 3k on something JUST to game on. Would have to spend a good amount more for a desk, speakers and a damn good monitor.
      Maybe in a couple more years from now.

    • @gomezalejandrog
      @gomezalejandrog 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Honestly tried this, and there is some nasty screen tearing. At least for Bioshock Infinite at 4k.
      Maybe I just need a better HDMI cable.

    • @bunsirose6123
      @bunsirose6123 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      well for me is 28 enough....

  • @troyjralph
    @troyjralph 5 ปีที่แล้ว +348

    Gaming at 1440p 144hz (160hz) the perfect compromise

    • @patrickwheeler2646
      @patrickwheeler2646 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I'm watching this on a 1440 but selected 2160. What am I?!

    • @Cris-nj9bt
      @Cris-nj9bt 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      My teacher pc screen res is 1366x768 but he can put 4k in youtube . But resolution isn't changed. WTF ??

    • @IntelCoreik-qf8xu
      @IntelCoreik-qf8xu 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Cris-nj9bt is beacause it's upscaled to 768p

    • @IntelCoreik-qf8xu
      @IntelCoreik-qf8xu 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Cris-nj9bt he needs a 4k monitor to notice the difference

    • @Cris-nj9bt
      @Cris-nj9bt 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@IntelCoreik-qf8xu His monitor supports 4K

  • @amandakreutzer6674
    @amandakreutzer6674 7 ปีที่แล้ว +379

    man whenever i look at details up close in a game lime this i cant help but be blown away by the fact that this world isnt real or naturally made. like...some dude went through and made each one of those little details. anyone who says this isnt art is an idiot

    • @Difixed
      @Difixed 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Amanda C
      Ever heard of photo realism 😂

    • @Shdw-do2ds
      @Shdw-do2ds 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      this isn't art. lol I'm a idiot

    • @bored5333
      @bored5333 5 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      @@Shdw-do2ds Yes, we can tell because you said "I'm a idiot" instead of "I'm AN idiot"

    • @NoName-fn6ee
      @NoName-fn6ee 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah, Games like Witcher 3 are real Art, nobody knows, how much work this is taking, and how much expertise and skill is needed for this, and than people cry paying 60€ for games like this!

    • @prumchhangsreng979
      @prumchhangsreng979 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      well that because you don't even understand what "art" even mean.
      There is a difference between, hardwork, art, talent, and eyes catching product.
      Art is just a product of artist expressing their feeling/emtion.
      In this case, they arent trying to express emotion or ****, they just try to make it look realisetic, passionate and workhard!
      Im not saying its not impressive, I'm just saying u are an idiot.

  • @daylightriot5671
    @daylightriot5671 6 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    both the 1080p and 2k videos are run on a non native resolution monitor whereas the 4k is. this means the graphics will look fuzzy on the 1080p and 2k videos. on 1080p or 2k monitor these videos would be much much clearer. for those not in the know, this is a scaling issue and can be fixed by tweeking settings for apps/games under properties

  • @nikitakuzin6519
    @nikitakuzin6519 8 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    I was expecting to see Yennefer`s chest in 4K. I'm so disappointed :c

  • @Umbruhh
    @Umbruhh 4 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    Yes, I love putting my face right in front of the monitor when playing The Witcher so I can see how many pixels are in Geralt's face.

    • @lukemark9262
      @lukemark9262 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      will that be a case for a 2K 32 inch monitor?

  • @Username-it8co
    @Username-it8co 6 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    When you just recently started playing at 1080p...

  • @KingdomUploader
    @KingdomUploader 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    1080 still looks fine for me.

  • @specops2739
    @specops2739 7 ปีที่แล้ว +122

    The most intriguing thing noticeable was the massive drop in framerate from 1080p - 4k, or 2k - 4k. The choppiness was real. 2k seems to be the limit on your system w/o ridiculously low framerate. Must have been around 30-45 fps, which, to me, is noticeable and unacceptable when gaming. Verdict: 2K is the ideal happy medium.

    • @specops2739
      @specops2739 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Also, for fastpaced gaming like an Fps or other such, reponse time and refresh rates are far more important than resolution. Ideally, 1 ms response and 144hz (or higher) refresh rate. Resolution makes it look better, while response time and refresh rates make turning/twitch 'ghosting free', no tearing, and smooth as silk, like real life. Higher res is for visual embellishment. I prefer 2.5k and 4.5k. Higher than 4.5K isn't all that noticeable, as 4.5k is just about as saturated with pixels to reflect the real world as you'll ever really need. Higher res IMHO is just for people who have money to burn for bragging rights. Simple eg. are people who have a Bugatti. Does anyone NEED one? No. Would it be cool to have one? Sure, if you have $1.5m to drop on a single car.

    • @funkdahmental
      @funkdahmental 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      the massive drop in framerate is due to his graphics processor. didnt have anything powerful enough to render those 4k textures. hell its 2019 and my RTX 2070 struggles to keep my frames consistently above 40 on a 4k monitor

    • @Chadowgon5
      @Chadowgon5 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@funkdahmental My gtx 1080 ti 11gb oc is pretty good in 4k, but i love to use mods and reshades so i limit some games to 45 fps, but rdr 2 on 4k in 40 fps is really smooth

    • @user-sd6ec4zd7i
      @user-sd6ec4zd7i 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Chadowgon5 if i play witsher and skyrim moods, it need high screen fps or a 2k 75fps is enough? Thank you first ❤️

    • @Crlarl
      @Crlarl 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      2K isn't 1440p.

  • @IceCubeInMyIceTea
    @IceCubeInMyIceTea 7 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    You answered all my questions about 4K without speaking a word.

  • @Bonislam
    @Bonislam 6 ปีที่แล้ว +114

    The horse is running faster on 4K !

    • @Adrianbudiman
      @Adrianbudiman 5 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      It's running away from the bill for the GPU....

    • @kiwitokiwigaya4560
      @kiwitokiwigaya4560 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      From what I have seen 4k is faster in losing things but has the worst frame rate out of the 3

  • @cirillafionaelenrhiannon817
    @cirillafionaelenrhiannon817 8 ปีที่แล้ว +155

    The Witcher 3 is 100000000 times more beautiful than real life

    • @fauxfox7209
      @fauxfox7209 7 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Virgin is such an outdated insult, unless all you aspire to is sex which every single human even cripples have done.

    • @turbo_bikini
      @turbo_bikini 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's true lol

    • @oOEnderHunterOo
      @oOEnderHunterOo 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      " every single human even cripples have done." im not sure thats better than what he said, considering it sounds like your saying that if someone takes pitty on a crippled dude and has sex with him/ her, then anyone can (atleast thats how it sounds, i could be wrong) but it sounds like you meant it in a nasty way; sorry, im just asking if you could clarify what you meant? cause it doesnt sound better then what he wrote.

    • @zach_zach5898
      @zach_zach5898 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Modded skyrim on ultra is 100 times prettier than w3

    • @lort6022
      @lort6022 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      leave the basement then

  • @ginopanesgamepiazza4376
    @ginopanesgamepiazza4376 7 ปีที่แล้ว +84

    I think that the difference is not worth it.
    Especially 2k vs 4k.
    We do not use microscope while playing to see all these small details, so you just do not notice them.

    • @frydwa547
      @frydwa547 7 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Yes,but this detalization creates absolutely different experience and makes picture look much realistic.
      Specially,if you have 4k monitor and gtx1080

    • @stickyrice2141
      @stickyrice2141 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ive played on both and let me tell ya, 4k with mods is out of this world and I have a 1080p upscale to 4k through video card haha.

    • @raffydoodleme
      @raffydoodleme 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      what is this upscaling thing?

    • @ctristproduction4024
      @ctristproduction4024 7 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      I don't think a 1080 can handle the witcher 3 in ultra+4k

    • @MonkeyDIvan
      @MonkeyDIvan 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      C'Trist Production it can

  • @InsecureCrab
    @InsecureCrab 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Wow, the difference at distance is amazing. I cant wait for tech to get affordable enough to run 4k at 60fps. You might actually be able to see more than a blur when looking far down the road.

    • @danielblackmore9702
      @danielblackmore9702 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      3 years later...still not affordable. Running a 2080 Super 4k/60fps.

    • @darius6041
      @darius6041 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@danielblackmore9702 Yep, it will be long until 4K 60 fps is accesible to most of the gamers

    • @ericcartman3485
      @ericcartman3485 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@darius6041 4k 144hz would be my endgame, the monitors are there, but not the hardware :/

    • @darius6041
      @darius6041 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ericcartman3485 Trust me , it will be loooong until the hardware will be capable of 4K, ultra graphics , at 144 fps :/

    • @ericcartman3485
      @ericcartman3485 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@darius6041 Sure? I thought 5-10 years would be realistic. Im already playing at 1440p 144hz and its doable with my 2080

  • @OP4455OP
    @OP4455OP 8 ปีที่แล้ว +141

    who watched this in 144p?

    • @gabrielalejandrro4358
      @gabrielalejandrro4358 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      TAIWANxtwbbs me

    • @ratstar4102
      @ratstar4102 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      me also

    • @nlluke5207
      @nlluke5207 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      in 144hz yes

    • @LilBrujoFH18
      @LilBrujoFH18 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      IM PLAYING THIS GAME IN 1440P ON MEDIUM OVER 60 FPS. COULD DO HIGH BUT WILL GET 60 FPS. I SHOULD BE HAPPY I AM TO PLAY IT AT 1440P INSTEAD OF 1080P ULTRA.

    • @NOT_A_BOB
      @NOT_A_BOB 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      ORZpasserAtw SONY?

  • @R3C0NTV
    @R3C0NTV 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    1440p is the best because it is the perfect middle between 1080p and 4k. Wont break the bank either but still looks gorgeous and better than standard FHD.

  • @xXGONZALOLOCOXx
    @xXGONZALOLOCOXx 8 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    I didn't knew the difference was that big between settings... wow

    • @gianturion
      @gianturion 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ikr

    • @EDI-AI
      @EDI-AI 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Because it's not, uploader is an idiot. Witcher 3 does not look like a game from 1996, even if all you have is a regular non 4k monitor.

    • @wuzimusic7700
      @wuzimusic7700 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      EDI AI this is true

    • @guy827
      @guy827 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      EDI AI, you don't understand. He zoomed in so you can see the difference no matter what monitor you're on. Whether it be 1080p or 1440p.

  • @DefineHatespeech
    @DefineHatespeech 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Thank you for correctly choosing to showcase the greatest game ever made. +1

  • @luisreyes456
    @luisreyes456 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Man the difference between 1440p (refered here as 2k) and 4k is HUUUUGE and before zooming in! My eyes definitely appreciate 4k while some other dont notice that much of a difference

  • @huyucle1228
    @huyucle1228 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I can see the clear difference even on a 1080p monitor. The grass is a blurry strip on 1080p, while in 4K it's possible to distinguish different batches of grass.

  • @noamias4897
    @noamias4897 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I really hope it gets to the point where you’ll be able to play with 4K on ultra in games like GTA V with 240fps on a 4K 240hz monitor

    • @ImperatorClassJerk
      @ImperatorClassJerk 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wait 4-5 years and that will be the standard. Then we will be crazy about 8K!

    • @acombo
      @acombo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ImperatorClassJerk bro you can buy 8k tv

    • @ImperatorClassJerk
      @ImperatorClassJerk 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@acombo yeah but our hardware isn't powerful enough to run it yet and 8k tvs cost many thousands of dollars, which is why i said wait 5 years or so

    • @acombo
      @acombo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      ok

    • @jjt171
      @jjt171 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ImperatorClassJerk not the standard in
      5 years, but maybe 15 or 20

  • @kamez1049
    @kamez1049 8 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    I am trying to see a difference on a smartphone with a 720p display lol

    • @2yt4u.14.
      @2yt4u.14. 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nuclear Redfield what for phone i have the s8 and i can only 1080p

    • @dogswithjobslondon
      @dogswithjobslondon 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have a 4K monitor and the highest is playing 4K. Phones aren't likely to have a 4K option on the TH-cam app (not sure about brand new phones)

    • @nunosilva3260
      @nunosilva3260 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@2yt4u.14. i have s8+ and i can see atr 1440p kkk

    • @gamesmaster1060
      @gamesmaster1060 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nunosilva3260 same

    • @ggs1019
      @ggs1019 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nunosilva3260 same

  • @GamesZeroPlay
    @GamesZeroPlay 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    for me 2k is the ideal point, it's not as blurry as 1080p, and it doesn't lose as much performance as 4k

  • @Configurations
    @Configurations 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I can notice a big difference between all three on my 65 inch TV. I didn't think I'd see such a big difference!

  • @aegisfate41808
    @aegisfate41808 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good comparison showing the difference I noticed when I switched.
    People are acting like 4k is unacheivable or something.
    4k TV on sale $400 - $500, not $1000 +.
    More like $1500 - $2000 for a PC to run it well, not $7000.

  • @supermariosotuttoio
    @supermariosotuttoio 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is not 1080p vs 2K vs 4K, this is FHD vs QHD vs UHD. How much confusing is that title.

    • @Crlarl
      @Crlarl 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Someone here actually understands.

  • @strider5119
    @strider5119 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    1080p, when you care about gaming.
    2k, when you care slightly less about gaming and more about beauty.
    4k, when you care only for beauty, no matter how many fps you lose, or people you leave dead and bloodied along the way, just so long as you can make a name for yourself as an investigatory journalist!

  • @olamouchi5721
    @olamouchi5721 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    now this is a nice video cause i have watched some videos comparing 2k to 4k where they have been in 1080p uploaded !!

  • @CrownedGaming
    @CrownedGaming 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    So, is this a video only people with 4k resolution monitors can/should watch?
    For ex: I'm watching this video on a 1080p res monitor, with the video settings on 1080p... This shit is just too complex for me to break down lol... I wanna say at the end of the day I can only see what my monitor (forget my eyeballs) is able to show..? Ah whatever.

  • @Crlarl
    @Crlarl 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You mislabeled the middle resolution: It should be, "2.5K," not, "2K."

  • @alex16hertz
    @alex16hertz 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    4K is the most perfect one, but more expensive. Since my RTX 3060 can't really handle 4K
    I choosed to buy a 2K monitor from Samsung Odyssey G5, very proud by owning it.

  • @sankethtricksforyou0077
    @sankethtricksforyou0077 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Meanwhile i am watching this in 360p 😏😅

  • @vinmangob8555
    @vinmangob8555 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Playing in 1440p with my 3060 ti, looks amazing, not sure if ill never need 4k.

  • @de-bakmainchannel6216
    @de-bakmainchannel6216 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Did you testing the 1080p and 2k on a 4k monitor or on their each own native monitor?
    I can understand when you set lower res than the monitor native res, they will tearing apart (blurry)

  • @quentinvauttier5521
    @quentinvauttier5521 7 ปีที่แล้ว +81

    FHD VS QHD VS UHD

    • @Babayaga08122
      @Babayaga08122 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Quentin VAUTTIER vs FUHD 8K

    • @zioxei
      @zioxei 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Fuck Ur High Definition

    • @fearget7249
      @fearget7249 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Not 2K)))

    • @zioxei
      @zioxei 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      what

  • @agxtreme_official
    @agxtreme_official หลายเดือนก่อน

    Games nowadays are smooth they lost the roughness that we old school gamers prefer

  • @AdikMusicOfficialTM
    @AdikMusicOfficialTM 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    1080p = 200+fps
    2k = 100+fps
    4k = 30fps

  • @bkill7
    @bkill7 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    In fast FPS games, you will be moving around so fast you won't even notice the difference anyways

  • @VypaGaming
    @VypaGaming 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    1080p vs 4k in a vlog would be a thing featured in a video titled on the lines of... "if you spot the difference you're a genius - 1% of the world spot the difference"

    • @Dydy-ep2pf
      @Dydy-ep2pf 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      i play in 4k 60 fps 100 pouces videoprojector on far cry 5 ..,i see a difference it s amazing difference

  • @tripmine4969
    @tripmine4969 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Now do it again, but with msaa.

  • @furys.6900
    @furys.6900 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Great video demonstration, I really appreciated the zoom ins. You can see a considerable difference between 1080p & 4K. I'm sold , I'm going to invest in a 4K tv now & pre order the Xbox one X. Thank you.

  • @reaper211861
    @reaper211861 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video mainly shows you the discrepancies of resolution in tune with graphic settings. The zoom is just to show how different resolutions can filter out bad aliasing, you guys are being a bit over critical. Great video I think the difference is massive!

  • @lolohasan6424
    @lolohasan6424 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    2K quality at normaly is not bad like in the videos. No big difference bettwen 2K and 4K as much as we will say wow

  • @189wow
    @189wow 7 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    great music

  • @prodigieX
    @prodigieX 7 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Change the title. It should be 1080p vs 1440p vs 4K
    Or 1080p vs 2.5k vs 4K
    Or 2K vs 2.5K vs 4K

    • @MrZodiac011
      @MrZodiac011 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      yeah, most people that 2k is 1440p but 2k is 1080p, 2160p is 4k which is 2x height and width of 1080p so how come 1440p is 2k to some people, it's just 100% false

    • @satanzero5082
      @satanzero5082 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      True

    • @shadowv6794
      @shadowv6794 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MrZodiac011 No

    • @theodorewinstone-hooper1446
      @theodorewinstone-hooper1446 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah 2k and 4k are both, techincally incorrect. 1440p often gets mistaken for 2k when 2k is the cinema version of 1080p which is 2048x1080, and 4k is actually 4096x2160. Desktop resolutions and movie resolutions are differentttt

    • @strider5119
      @strider5119 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      fuck up. jesus. every 1440p monitor is marketed as a 2k monitor. Whether the pixels and shit line up is irrelevant. It's titled "2k" monitor. Most 5L v8 engines aren't truly 5L, they just round it up to be a nice, even number. Why don't you write an angry email to every manufacturer ever, and demand they change the description of their 2k monitors to 2.5k, as THEY are clearly wrong.

  • @johnjackson3735
    @johnjackson3735 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    There is a big difference to me. The noise and blurriness on the bottom is a lot more pronounced than the top one in 4K and this does not even take into account the much faster frame per second rates on 4K's or the fact that they also have HDR while 1080 screens do not. I also have bad astigmatism and the difference is still big.

  • @thapatpool
    @thapatpool 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    1080p is nice but i'm on 720p screen

  • @slumy8195
    @slumy8195 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Scares me how realistic 4k is wow! We wouldnt be able to tell the difference from 4k and irl....

  • @wanderinglord8164
    @wanderinglord8164 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think 4k vs 1080 p is huge diff but 2 k is mhe

  • @reekyfartin
    @reekyfartin 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I hate it when people make videos about 4K resolution when their rigs can’t handle it. 4K looks like shit if you aren’t getting good frame rates.

  • @grilovan
    @grilovan 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    You know that 2k is not 1440p?
    Just Google "2k in pixels" and u will see that 2k is 2048×1080 while full hd is still 1920×1080

  • @Username-it8co
    @Username-it8co 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    When you just jumped onto 1080p 60fps a year ago and now everyone is talking about 1440p 144hz...

  • @larrylitmanen9877
    @larrylitmanen9877 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This video was posted 4 years ago. Still 4k is too resource hungry, people still need to buy a top of the line gpu.
    I think it is pretty clear, 1080p is the way to go for at least another 5 years.

    • @callum7596
      @callum7596 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What would you go with 4k 60hz or 2k 144hz

  • @Dizazta420
    @Dizazta420 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i thought my game had problem with grass/trees texture. turns out 1080p sucks balls. had to use dsr to game on 4k to fix the texture problem. gta 5 grass looks better on 1080p

  • @yesman3209
    @yesman3209 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You dont really notice those little details unless you’re the type of gamer that just walks around and be amazed by the graphics instead of playing the actual game what you do really notice is the fps going from smooth to wtf

  • @leontof_75
    @leontof_75 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Playing at a resolution that is above Full HD is simply a total loss of performance, because in practice you won't notice these minimal differences for resolutions above Full HD...

  • @daniel-mi7rv
    @daniel-mi7rv 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Now theres not much 4k montiors with 144hz, enough brightness nits to enable the hdr, low contrast ratio.....
    Soo i guess 2k is the sweetspot

  • @forgedstarknight9620
    @forgedstarknight9620 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    1440p is 2.5K, 1080p is 2K. PC Marketing screwed with people.

  • @NoName-fn6ee
    @NoName-fn6ee 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeah, Games like Witcher 3 are real Art, nobody knows, how much work this is taking, and how much expertise and skill is needed for this, and than people cry paying 60€ for games like this!

  • @boblarry7879
    @boblarry7879 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just recently started playing games at 2160p and i am in awe the whole time i am playing.

  • @roni.s375
    @roni.s375 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    you wont be able to see the difference unless your monitor supports 4k, and to see the difference you cant leave it at 4k and compare it. You gotta change from 1080 to 2k to 4k and look at each slide on its said resolution to truly see the difference

  • @SaithMasu12
    @SaithMasu12 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have to admit, the difference between 1080p and 4k is insane. Night and day difference.

  • @chickenbob562
    @chickenbob562 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    got a 144hz for multiplayer shooter games
    4k for singleplayer games or a few online games where the refresh rate doesn't matter
    and another standard 60hz monitor for whatever is open that i don't want on my main monitors like discord for example
    true way to go guys

  • @MrStereo1987
    @MrStereo1987 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Full hd в низком разрешении экрана записывают)

  • @stathiskafidas9020
    @stathiskafidas9020 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video man. 4K will be the next big thing in gaming. Looking forward to 4K TV technology to become more affordable. And of course PS4 Neo και Scorpio to come out.

    • @RatusMax
      @RatusMax 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      4k TV worthless imo...projectors are the future!!!

    • @jak3legacy
      @jak3legacy 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Except those consoles arent half as powerful as a GTX 1080, which can barely keep up with 4k Witcher 3.

  • @olegka_skuter6438
    @olegka_skuter6438 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Если все тесты проводились на одном мониторе 4к просто понижая разрешение, то да, качество будет настолько уебищное, что б показать: " ну нихера ж себе, пойду брать!"

  • @orogu
    @orogu 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Watching from my 720p cellphone screen!! Looks incredible!!

  • @IgrisDeez
    @IgrisDeez 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    1 I woke up
    2. I went to a computer store
    3. I bought a new monitor
    4.I played
    5. I took a nap
    its actually
    2
    3
    4
    5
    1

  • @Torbulous
    @Torbulous 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Remember those days when you DIDN'T have to zoom in so much to get a good reolution comparison?

    • @CoCo.-_-
      @CoCo.-_- 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      they do it so if people have lower res screens they can still see not everyone has a 4k screen to show the number of pixels it has compared to lower ones you cannot show 4k properly on a 1080p screen because you can not change the physical pixels of a screen without a new one with a higher amount of pixels so they zoom it in so you get a better idea of it for the pixel density, people used to complain there is no difference between HD and 480p back when hd was entering the market and it is happening again and it will continue to happen with 8k and 16k res until they get it and then they try going back from 4k to 1080p and they cannot because it looks worse i play at 4k and most if not all the stuff i do on my screen is 4k if it is lower i see the difference and it looks worse just as it would be worse going from 1080p to 480p

  • @leonea1985
    @leonea1985 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    its hard to see a real diferrence watching this video on fullhd display and in fullhd quality resolution

  • @sitarasoi8659
    @sitarasoi8659 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Literally I didn't found any difference without zoom

  • @TANuclear
    @TANuclear 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    difference from 2k to 4k on a 27 inch is easily noticeable and much better. at least from how I use it around 80cm away.

  • @2GE4EV
    @2GE4EV 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    how we can see 4k when our devices not support 4k screen

    • @plsno8125
      @plsno8125 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      chris a screen that small will not let you see any difference in pixel quality unless you are using binoculars or have superhuman eyesight

    • @plsno8125
      @plsno8125 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I own a 55" 4k tv, and the difference between 4k and 1080p is literally indistinguishable from beyond 4 feet away. Your eye literally cannot distinguish the pixel density unless you have beyond 20/20 vision

    • @plsno8125
      @plsno8125 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Apple's displays are 1080p on 5.5" and it is already beyond the limit of the human eye

    • @plsno8125
      @plsno8125 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This isnt my opinion, this is the actual science behind display tech. If you have 20/20 vision you cannot see a difference between 1080p and 4k on a 4" screen unless your face is 4" away or closer.

    • @octo8934
      @octo8934 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You don't lol

  • @mr.surprise2341
    @mr.surprise2341 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    good video. People without 4k displays though will never know the color difference though lol. My mind was blown when I loaded up Witcher III in 4k. Everything is so much more vivid.

    • @ArtyCraftZ
      @ArtyCraftZ 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Chris Sanders Though

  • @detmer87
    @detmer87 7 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    1080P = 2K
    1440P = 2.5K

    • @michaelbauers8800
      @michaelbauers8800 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well, 3840 × 2160 is sometimes called 4k. So taking a guess, mathematically, 2k, at the same aspect ratio is therefore 1920x1080. So that's not how to do it. I could average 3840 and 1920, but that's not 1440p either. So 2k does seem to be a confusion resolution name for 1440p

    • @maratah
      @maratah 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@michaelbauers8800 yep, the creator of the video don't understand what is 2K and 4K and 1440p.
      "2k" is the standard cinema industry resolution wich is 2048 x 1080, it's near to full hd, it's 2.3Mpixels
      1440p is a pc resolution : 4x720P basically, named QHD because Quad HD, 4 time the HD ready standard (720p), we could name this "3.7k" because it's 3,7Mpixels.
      and "4K" is the cinema industry resolution wich is 4096 x 2160 and is near to UHD wich is 4x1080p and it's 8Mpixels.
      Simple as that.

  • @voltechzx7725
    @voltechzx7725 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When i was a kid... I saw 1080p not that pixelated😢

  • @mulleh07
    @mulleh07 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't like the term 2k, i just doesn't represent 1440p properly, 4k doesn't have twice the pixels on the 'y' plane. Probably why '2k' never caught on.

    • @jak3legacy
      @jak3legacy 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      It has roughly 2 times the pixels overall, and 4k has 4 times the pixels of 1080p overall. 1080p = 2mil pixels, 2k = 3.7mil pixels (85% more is damn close to 100% if you ask me), 4k = 8 mil pixels.

    • @supermariosotuttoio
      @supermariosotuttoio 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      2K never caught on just because is so similar to 1080p (True 2K of DCI is 2048x1080)

  • @pavilionman64
    @pavilionman64 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    4K gamers be like: oh a bunch of enemies are approaching, wait a minute, let me appreciate how sharp and smooth this wooden cart looks mmm...and these bushes ohh yaaah.

  • @jahsuebhubndjk1804
    @jahsuebhubndjk1804 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    i do read a lot of people saying that there is almost no difference between 2k and 4k. Are they blind? 4k is much crispier even without the zoom

  • @999slawter
    @999slawter 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1440p is more than enough between 24' and 32'

  • @notthatguy4703
    @notthatguy4703 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I hope everyone realizes you won’t see a difference unless your monitor is 4K.
    Also, 1080p becomes blurry at around a 24” screen, so any less than that...

    • @_Grannny_
      @_Grannny_ 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thats why he zoom in.unless other useless 4k comparison videos he's zooming in for you to see difference even if you have 4/2k monitor.

  • @vlogger9461
    @vlogger9461 8 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    gtx 1080 sli or single ?

    • @georgejpg
      @georgejpg 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      you can run the game at 4k 60fps on max? thats pretty damn impressive

    • @imalsoTOMATO
      @imalsoTOMATO 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      1080 baby

    • @mattcing5462
      @mattcing5462 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      titan x(p).

    • @CloudOmegaVII
      @CloudOmegaVII 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Non of thise will play HDR. Nvidia new GTX cards with HDR will release on March 2017. Your graphics cards sucks today.

    • @SpartanA31xx
      @SpartanA31xx 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Woah really bro, I was going to buy a GPU is this really when NVIDIA will release their new GPU?

  • @cowpokke
    @cowpokke 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Did we get a 4K video resolution, 30 frames per second? And 1080 60 frames per second? Please explain

  • @doctordumb1477
    @doctordumb1477 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wants to do a comparison of 4k/2k/1080p and uploads it at 1080

  • @bitasaur
    @bitasaur 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Watching on my 1080 monitor

  • @zemyaso
    @zemyaso 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    How ironic, I'm watching this from an iPad Mini 1 which can't show the difference between all of these because the Resolution caps out at 720p

  • @multigamingg9369
    @multigamingg9369 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    i dont really mind 1080p, all i want is any resolution 60fps not 4k 30fps

  • @jbachtiar
    @jbachtiar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Me watching this trying to see the difference but only got 480p on youtube be like: 👁👄👁

  • @tzvetantzvetanov5598
    @tzvetantzvetanov5598 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can't tell the difference between 1080p, 2k and 4k unless I really concentrate to look at it. Unless you really zoom it in.

  • @rjlewis3932
    @rjlewis3932 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    At 1:1, the human eye with 20/20 vision cannot discriminate above 1080p. The difference only matters when the images are magnified.

    • @AndreasRP.
      @AndreasRP. 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Source please

    • @rjlewis3932
      @rjlewis3932 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Andreas Look Google it. I learned it in medical school.

    • @AndreasRP.
      @AndreasRP. 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Frank Black yea yea and some people say that the human eye can’t see above 24 fps yet I can clearly see if something is 144fps or 24fps and I can see if something is 1080p, 1440p and 2160p, more detail is present the higher your pixel density is.

  • @NavedSayed
    @NavedSayed 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Here everyone is discussing about resolutions and I'm here thinking about how to earn money

    • @arthive2435
      @arthive2435 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Sayyed Naveed Make youtube videos that compare 2k to 4k.

  • @batudunmez7269
    @batudunmez7269 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    and should ı buy a 144 hz 2k monitor or 4k 60hz

    • @99Ctube
      @99Ctube 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Depends. 4k only at 32", and only if you have a strong gpu and plan to play games like Tomb Raider, Cyberpunk, Witcher. It will be gorgeous. If you go for 27", 1440p is enough, though it will not have the sharpness of a 4k display. But if you play a lot of multiplayer games and enjoy being good at it, 144hz is the way to go.

    • @batudunmez7269
      @batudunmez7269 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@99Ctube thanks u really help me

  • @MioYuki
    @MioYuki 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    *comparison between resolutions*
    Me: *Watching the video in 380p*

  • @JuubixPwN
    @JuubixPwN 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    2K is 1080p. Just like 2160p is 4K... 1440p is not 2K... to be honest 1080p is not 2K just like 2160p is either not 4K. You call it FHD and UHD.. 1440p is QHD. You cant call 3840x2160 a 4K Resolution.

  • @midophriya3657
    @midophriya3657 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I just tried 2k few weeks ago came from 1080p, now I don't wanna go back. planing to buy pc. 4k is too much sacrificing fps and expensive.

  • @ThePaperkrain
    @ThePaperkrain 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    1440p (2k) at higher FPS (100-160fps) is WAAY better than 4k at 20-40 FPS.

  • @Jhon-Umbe
    @Jhon-Umbe 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Honesly i don't so much differences from fhd to 2k, but 4k is a way different

  • @mayukhsen8195
    @mayukhsen8195 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    All of this makes sense *UNTIL??????.....*
    You have played on 1080p 240hz display.
    And then.... You will sell that 4k 60hz monitor and your left nut, to get a 240hz monitor.
    I did.......

  • @lordPix3lUK
    @lordPix3lUK 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you're pc is struggling like hell at 4k and a little at 1440p. gtx 970? my gtx 1080 just about manages ultra on 1440p

    • @hollowbonesfilms9739
      @hollowbonesfilms9739 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      ive got an R9 380. it can handle 4k but it struggles slightly.

    • @jak3legacy
      @jak3legacy 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      maybe at 45fps