Blood Clotting: The Body’s Emergency Response System Secrets of the Cell, Ep. 7

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ส.ค. 2024
  • What happens when your body is cut? Why don’t you bleed to death? Join biochemist Michael Behe as he explores your body’s amazing emergency response system known as the blood clotting cascade. Learn how the body has its own 911 system and first responders that work to repair punctures to the skin before they kill you. This is Episode 7 of Behe’s video series “Secrets of the Cell.” More episodes can be viewed at michaelbehe.co... or • Someone Must Have the ...
    ============================
    The Discovery Science News Channel is the official TH-cam channel of Discovery Institute's Center for Science & Culture. The CSC is the institutional hub for scientists, educators, and inquiring minds who think that nature supplies compelling evidence of intelligent design. The CSC supports research, sponsors educational programs, defends free speech, and produce articles, books, and multimedia content. For more information visit www.discovery....
    www.evolutionne...
    www.intelligent...
    Follow us on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter:
    Twitter: / discoverycsc
    Facebook: / discoverycsc
    Instagram: / discoverycsc
    Visit other TH-cam channels connected to the Center for Science & Culture
    Discovery Institute: / discoveryinstitute
    Dr. Stephen C. Meyer: / drstephenmeyer

ความคิดเห็น • 140

  • @IntoAllTruth.
    @IntoAllTruth. ปีที่แล้ว +12

    That is amazing. We are fearfully and wonderfully made.

  • @justgopherit3454
    @justgopherit3454 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    It's so amazing as we've discovered how sophisticated and complex everything is, even as we look deeper and deeper into the cell, that so many still believe in Darwinian evolution when he himself thought cells were as simple as mud.

  • @howtodoit4204
    @howtodoit4204 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I realized after taking my AP anatomy class how my happiness and positive thinking increased because I couldn’t believe how amazing and grandiose my body was and also was very thankful to God instead of being depressed for absolutely no reason.

  • @markworth7167
    @markworth7167 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Thank you once again Dr. Behe for explaining in layman's terms the wondrous designs in the human body. There is no possible way this system -- or any other biological system, for that matter -- could have "evolved" through "natural selection."

    • @TrevoltIV
      @TrevoltIV 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They think that a prokaryotic cell (still very complex) popped out of a random primordial sludge. It's really frightening how illogical our society is becoming.

  • @samuelmatz
    @samuelmatz ปีที่แล้ว +6

    'complexity' is the operative word regarding life. " I praise You, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made."

  • @akhiltabraham6717
    @akhiltabraham6717 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I'm immensely grateful for the intelligent design of the blood clotting system.

  • @KenJackson_US
    @KenJackson_US ปีที่แล้ว +65

    The more I learn of the intricacies of the designs of life, the more amazed I am. And I'm all the more shocked that anyone could be naïve enough to believe they could be designed by the accumulation of damage.

    • @Arbutuscoveretreat
      @Arbutuscoveretreat ปีที่แล้ว +15

      It’s because people don’t want to be responsible to anyone other than themselves.

    • @nil1473
      @nil1473 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Arbutuscoveretreatvery well put..u hit the bull's eye..everybody needs to read ur answer..ur answer is brief but very precise and deep 👌👌🙏🙏

    • @nil1473
      @nil1473 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Ken👍👍

    • @jt2097
      @jt2097 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Arbutuscoveretreat When I read your comment I was surprised, I have used exactly the same words myself. People are willingly and wilfully blind. To adhere to a belief, which assures only death, surely is human stupidity at its apex.

    • @olgaleford4373
      @olgaleford4373 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      My thoughts exactly

  • @WaelHamadeh
    @WaelHamadeh ปีที่แล้ว +37

    Another gem to behold. Kudos to the team and much respect to Dr. Behe.

  • @kennethandersen5093
    @kennethandersen5093 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Michael Behe ​​you are a true genius, I have read all your books with great pleasure and I love your sharp way of using illustrations and parallels to visualize rather difficult subjects for us laymen and those of us who need solid arguments about for those who attack our belief in a higher intelligence. You make it so clear that I myself feel like I am the little boy in the Emperor's new clothes who, in amazement at other people's fascination with the Emperor, shouts "well, the emperors don't wear any clothes at all" and Behe ​​more and more are starting to laugh in relief over the fact that it wasn't just them who thought there was something wrong with that Emperor....
    It is shown so clearly with your brilliant illustration of how to make the game work with the ball falling over a series of completely randomly placed places on the game board,,, yes, it is so clear that those who continue to believe that "natural selection " is a scientifically viable explanation for complex functions such as how the eye came into being and how the blood clots... Well, these people really have a much stronger faith than us theists.

  • @maricogan2903
    @maricogan2903 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The initial scenario is perfection. this nurse knows that the follow up care in the emergency department is now the exception. Managed care, introduced in 2012-today has reduced staffing and increased documentation to the point that effective care has decreased. Just take my word for it.

  • @vladimirivanov2994
    @vladimirivanov2994 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Thank you for your work Dr. Behe!

  • @kpec3
    @kpec3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Dr Behe is such a genius! Very encouraging to believers!

  • @SpielbergMichael
    @SpielbergMichael ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Praise God!

  • @charlieallansen9763
    @charlieallansen9763 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I read his book and was utterly blown away!!! Absolutely awesome!!!

  • @greggy553
    @greggy553 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    I read your book back in the 90's. I always had my doubts about Darwinian evolution, and your book convinced me once and for all.

    • @jt2097
      @jt2097 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I think the problem is that people extrapolate the fact that all life has the 'ability to adapt to changing environments by natural selection of genetic variants created within the cell' into Darwinian evolution and common descent. Adaptation is fact, Darwinian evolution is imagination about the past. (Wishful thinking)

    • @imafeltersnatch7634
      @imafeltersnatch7634 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jt2097 What is Darwin evolution? I didn't realize that there is more than one version of evolution and can only find the Scientific Theory of Evolution when I search

    • @logic8673
      @logic8673 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@imafeltersnatch7634 you have not heard who Darwin is?

  • @LynnColorado
    @LynnColorado ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I'm sharing this with others.

  • @vladimirivanov2994
    @vladimirivanov2994 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Intellectual honesty is a virtue difficult to find in our days even among scientists..

  • @rodneynorfolk9737
    @rodneynorfolk9737 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Thank you sir. God bless your efforts.

    • @manuelveronika491
      @manuelveronika491 ปีที่แล้ว

      Penasaran.ya.liat.orang2.yg..cerdas..seperti.pak.reza.indra.giri.bang.asep.irawan.bang.saor. bang.maeten..sima juntak.bang
      Kamarudin.simanjuntak.bang.jonTan.baskoro.ifma.hutabarat.bang.uya.kuya.pak.jamin
      Ginting.pak.roni
      Talapessi.sehat.selalu.pak.umur.panjang.smoga.kecetdasa n.mu.sampai.nenek.kakek.ya..komentar.ini.dari.nntt.labuan.bajo

  • @spiritualparadise4887
    @spiritualparadise4887 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    "I shall laud you because in a fear-inspiring way I am wonderfully made." (Psalm 139:14).

  • @bluejysm2007
    @bluejysm2007 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    What a great video and those systems animation, well done, thank you Dr. Behe for mentioning blood clotting and for also mentioning your later work from the Book “Darwin’s black box.” Was an easy read and changed most of our understanding that evolution basic concepts were wrong and accepted without a challenge. That book challenged these concepts. Well done Dr. Behe.

  • @patcunningham6170
    @patcunningham6170 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Dr Behe should have been given a Nobel Prize for chemistry or medicine, but running against science "orthodoxy" is even more liable to cancelling now than when Darwin's Black Box was first published.

  • @KerryPetersen
    @KerryPetersen ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Great as always!

  • @stevenmcnamara8123
    @stevenmcnamara8123 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Excellent logic ..bringing any honest intelligent person to assume there must be a cause of all causes.

  • @RelentlessHomesteading
    @RelentlessHomesteading ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Really appreciate this video. And wonderful graphics in this video -- easier to share with others.
    You mentioned Darwin's Black box -- still have it on my shelf from when it was first published.
    I grew up in an atheist household but there were oh so many issues with materialism -- it just doesn't all add up.
    I was an electronic engineer designing systems -- and so the DESIGN of what we see in nature always seems very apparent.
    Evolutionary 'theory' -- is really just a random mutations followed by the extremely crude filter of 'natural selection'.
    Always appreciated how you stepped out to show specifics and why random selection like that cannot support significant changes having interrelated elements.
    RH

  • @nicoak571
    @nicoak571 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I really enjoy this series - they are short, concise and well-made!

  • @haroldchester904
    @haroldchester904 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Oh no - not the old blood clotting scenario again. Didn't we get this in 2005?

    • @peternyikos8020
      @peternyikos8020 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes, and Behe is telling the same truth about the genetically altered mice in the video that he was telling at the Dover 2005 trial. Unfortunately, the official transcript is flawed: at one point it switches from quoting Behe to quoting Doolittle's blunder about the mice without making it clear that it wasn't giving Behe's own correction of the blunder any more. If you listen to the video and then read the transcript carefully, you will see where the mixup took place.

  • @rubiks6
    @rubiks6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Unfortunately, my blood clotting system worked too good and blocked two of my heart arteries. A doctor reamed them out and put two stents in there for me. I had to take a blood thinner for a year. Every time I got the tiniest break in my skin (sometimes from just scratching an itch) I might bleed for hours. One morning I stubbed my toe on the bed leg. That evening I thought my toes felt weird and wet and I realized that my shoe was filled with blood. Yes, I'm familiar with the blood clotting system not working properly. Thank goodness I'm off the blood thinner medication!

    • @Fundamental_Islam.
      @Fundamental_Islam. ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Well it’s only paradise where everything will be perfect. In order to get there, struggle patiently in this life

  • @geobla6600
    @geobla6600 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It's truly mind numbing how many of these researchers that study any of the functions of these incredibly complex biological reactions can attribute these types of events to random chemicals reacting together for such a sequence of specific purposes.

    • @BabyBugBug
      @BabyBugBug 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because they are told to believe it and the unspoken rule is that you should never question it like what is in this video, lest you be labeled a creationist.

  • @kathywilson7062
    @kathywilson7062 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Amazing new animations! Thank you so much for your great work on these videos. They have greatly enhanced my anatomy and biology classes.

  • @michaelsteven8892
    @michaelsteven8892 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Very Interesting !! Well explained,
    highly informative & most important for maintaining sound health ! ❤️❤️

  • @MapleBoarder78
    @MapleBoarder78 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Love these! We get to show these to our homeschooled children. Public schools would never allow the children to see this. They are still perpetuating “lightning struck a pond, that made fish who crawled out and became rats that became monkeys that turned into humans.” 🤦🏼‍♂️

  • @mimelnaggar
    @mimelnaggar ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Thank you Dr. The truth is shockingly obvious . God bless you for taking the effort to enlighten us with such valuable information. Unfortunately, Many tend to resist such truth in order to avoid its implications.

  • @user-ih7gd7rv3t
    @user-ih7gd7rv3t หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent presentation! Honestly....how can people think these systems made themselves?

  • @rljay1941
    @rljay1941 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks again, Dr. Behe, for your research and clear thinking. I did a review of your 'Darwin Devolves' book for the RTB Houston Chapter a few years back. I am not a biologist, but I found your book very illuminating and helpful in understanding just a little bit more about our wonderful designed body.

  • @baltogary
    @baltogary ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Beautiful video and very persuasive, God bless you and your team!

  • @dave1370
    @dave1370 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    This is awesome

  • @robertecarpenter
    @robertecarpenter ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Brilliant scientist “misreads” report!!!!!
    Yeah sure.
    Do I need to guess which side of the creation debate he is on?

  • @olgaleford4373
    @olgaleford4373 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I wonder if there's an update on how vaccines can affect clotting mechanism

  • @ambrosianapier7545
    @ambrosianapier7545 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This hits similarly to the JW video series Was it Designed? Very good

  • @stephenhayesuk
    @stephenhayesuk ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Keep going Professor Behe, you know you are right despite the misprepresentation and slander.

  • @vanessac0382
    @vanessac0382 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    This makes me think God is a chemical engineer

    • @rubiks6
      @rubiks6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Of course, He is! He invented chemistry. He designed and implemented all the physical properties that make atoms do what they do.

    • @imafeltersnatch7634
      @imafeltersnatch7634 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rubiks6 When did he do this?

  • @craigbirchfield417
    @craigbirchfield417 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is THE video to show your favorite student taking biology. Another big nail in the coffin of evolutionary therory driven by chance and natural selection.

  • @sirtjcovertiii
    @sirtjcovertiii ปีที่แล้ว +2

    great video

  • @harleyxxfabco
    @harleyxxfabco ปีที่แล้ว

    Absolutely wonderful. Thank you.

  • @AdamOu01
    @AdamOu01 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    there's no way this has happened by chance. It's the creation of God.

  • @rramirez3555
    @rramirez3555 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks so much for this incredibly clear and interesting video!! God bless! We have a wonderful designer God!

  • @gi169
    @gi169 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awesome

  • @ErikBiskopst
    @ErikBiskopst ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for this great content that is also great executed technically :)

  • @reymago23
    @reymago23 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    fantastic as always! I used to wonder about this all the time, ever since I was a child, and when I first learned about Darwin and his evolution theory, it was total nonsense to me.

  • @GulzarAhmad-sw1kh
    @GulzarAhmad-sw1kh ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The existence of super-intelligence fits better into the matrix of rationality THAN the hypothesis of random & chaotic processes and natural selection.

  • @waqaasshiekh7148
    @waqaasshiekh7148 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What an Intelligent Person !!

  • @Youssef.A.A
    @Youssef.A.A ปีที่แล้ว +6

    i'm a Muslim and u helped me alot
    i hope Allah guide u to read the most interesting book ever Quran

    • @loricalass4068
      @loricalass4068 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’ve seen enough to know that either the Quran or the Bible is true, because they totally contradict one another on vital points.
      Although the Muslim religion teaches that the Bible has been altered, and is no longer reliable, the dead sea scrolls, found in 1947 in a cave, show that is just not true.
      The scrolls were written 2000 years ago, well before the Johnny-come-lately prophet appeared. They had many portions of the Old Testament in them, and in one case the whole book of Isaiah.
      Comparing those scrolls to the Bibles in synagogues and churches in 1947, when they were found, we saw very minor differences. Things like punctuation and spelling.
      We know the Bible has been well preserved. It is not only supported by archaeology, such as with those scrolls, but by history and science.

    • @killerbee6484
      @killerbee6484 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@loricalass4068you should do your research

  • @michaelgonzalez9058
    @michaelgonzalez9058 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's all in the body

  • @khurramhkhan
    @khurramhkhan ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Loved it

  • @stevenwiederholt7000
    @stevenwiederholt7000 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Remember now all this Just Happened by pure Random Chance! :-)

    • @hammalammadingdong6244
      @hammalammadingdong6244 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Evolution isn't 'pure random chance'.

    • @peternyikos8020
      @peternyikos8020 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@hammalammadingdong6244 Do you think mutations are NOT due to random chance? Of course, there is natural selection to help evolution along, but that in turn depends on the (random?) role of the environment determining whether a mutation is beneficial, neutral, or deleterious. For instance, as the video explains, the sickle cell trait is beneficial in a malaria-infested environment, but deleterious in the absence of malaria. Severely deleterious, for those with sickle cell anemia.

    • @meloveAi
      @meloveAi ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@peternyikos8020 Evolution isn't pure random chance, but mutations kinda are random. They're not exactly one and the same.

    • @jameshale6401
      @jameshale6401 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Chance dont exist if so it would need something to work with
      Like a coin for someone to make and pick up and flip then odds would be head or tail
      Name one thing that is 100 percent what you preach to be chance
      Well 100 percent anything aint so called chance at all but instead purpose

  • @mikelangelno
    @mikelangelno ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I believe it's true that there are over 100 steps/processes combined in the cascade and this is only a microcosm of the unimaginably complex immune system which is second only to the brain in complexity. Truly " in a fear-inspiring way (we are) wonderfully made" (Psalm 139:13-16)

  • @blueskiesandgreenpasturesp3848
    @blueskiesandgreenpasturesp3848 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fascinating. Sadly my friend’s husband is dying from a platelet disease .

  • @cptrikester2671
    @cptrikester2671 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    What is the interaction between the blood and the injections that are causing blood clots?

    • @robertlehman3660
      @robertlehman3660 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'll have to find the link, but I read a study that showed the mRNA vaccines were literally causing morphologic changes to the erythrocytes (red blood cells) causing abnormalities.

  • @MountainFisher
    @MountainFisher ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I acquired my engineering degrees before I studied biology and organic chemistry much later in the 1990s. I looked at biological organisms as being engineered from the beginning. I had learned early on not to ask too many pointed questions about how natural selection was able to 'create' complexity when all it was was adaptation, it selected bigger beaks or longer legs , but it didn't do anything creative except let the weaker animals die off. I pissed a professor off about the idea of a whale evolving in only 10 million years (been discovered it took much less time) by asking how does a cow sized creature evolve from being a land mammal to whale in such a short period of time? Just its fur bearing skin turning into hydrodynamic skin with blubber, how many changes did that take? Natural Selection was the only answer I got from him and I replied, "So the magical power of Natural Selection created new skin in big jumps and not little ones?" Remember I'm 38 years old, much older than every student in this required advanced class. He told me it wasn't magical and it did it in small increments and sit down and be quiet. I said, "OK got it, so it's Natural Selection did it just like Creationists say God did it." and I never asked a useless question again with Darwinists, it is their religion and there isn't any room for discussion.

  • @marzymarrz5172
    @marzymarrz5172 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Reminds me again of that old saying to the old saying that God is in the details.

  • @justd3123
    @justd3123 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ❤ darvinisn evolution is just one tiny part of nature.

  • @marcospinto1146
    @marcospinto1146 ปีที่แล้ว

    who do you then believe created all this complex biological system or designed it? Thank you

  • @akashverma4280
    @akashverma4280 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks to random blind mutations ❤ 😜

  • @dro8031
    @dro8031 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Here come the "why I have hemophilia then dawg?" 😅

  • @KarunanithiNRamachandran
    @KarunanithiNRamachandran ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Although Darwin's theory of evolution has proven to be unrealistic scientists and atheists still hold onto it because the only other alternative would be to believe in a creator .

  • @atmanbrahman1872
    @atmanbrahman1872 ปีที่แล้ว

    I expected a little more on the debate with doolitle and technicalities.

  • @danawilkes8322
    @danawilkes8322 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When it comes to evolution. "It's easier to fool people than to tell them that they have been fooled." Mark Twain.

  • @junacebedo888
    @junacebedo888 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    How did 'fibrinogen, thrombin etc etc' evolved? How much time they needed to become what they are now? Where did they evolved from? Darwin believers has no answers.

  • @abdlrhmn_ahmd
    @abdlrhmn_ahmd ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's the made of Allah ❤️

  • @PieJesu244
    @PieJesu244 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are you serious... Doctor Dolittle !

  • @johngriffiths2637
    @johngriffiths2637 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Ironic that this video led off with an example of how the (supposedly perfectly designed) clotting mechanism can kill you by causing a stroke.

    • @donhershfeld9930
      @donhershfeld9930 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ironic that you insist upon believing in a very incomplete and imperfect past state of affairs, that ANY ceature ever survived even one whole day, i.e. that life might ever exist, much less keep developing at random, collecting bit by bit its bare mimimal essential attributes.
      Consider more critically such a fundamental metabolism of say respiration. One either has a functional Kreb's cycled tapping an energy supply, or one doesn't. Yet you insist you be granted some imaginary wiggle room where FAR from fully functioning forms of life EVER got by.

  • @reeb9016
    @reeb9016 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Learning about this in Physiology in college made me say that day, "Absolutely amazing! There's no way there's no God. That could never just happen." It took me some years to become a Christian but I could never understand athiests. Silly.

    • @robertmoon1018
      @robertmoon1018 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ultimately the contrast between the Christian and the atheist is where their hope lies. The Christian has the hope of being in the presence of God unashamed, the atheist has the hope that he/she will never have to because of their shame. The issue is in the heart not the head.

    • @sandhufashionlook448
      @sandhufashionlook448 ปีที่แล้ว

      😍😍

  • @hmry7615
    @hmry7615 ปีที่แล้ว

    This happened to my dad. Only when we got to the hospital they left him in the waiting room while he continued to stroke. Major cerebellum stroke.

  • @AhirZamanSairi
    @AhirZamanSairi ปีที่แล้ว +7

    "The more thoroughly I conduct scientific research, the more I believe that science excludes atheism." -Lord Kelvin

  • @s.unosson
    @s.unosson ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Well explained, logical arguments. The evolution theory is powered by philosophical needs.

    • @therick363
      @therick363 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      The evolution theory is powered by scientific evidence, which is why it’s a theory.

    • @peternyikos8020
      @peternyikos8020 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@therick363 The naked fact of common descent of whole phyla of animals is powered by scientific evidence, especially of fossils. Behe has endorsed this and even strongly argued for it in two of his books, The Edge of Evolution and Darwin Devolves.
      Where Behe parts company is with the under-evidenced claim that natural selection WITHIN interbreeding populations, all in the same species, is adequate for explaining how the vast panorama of life on earth today came from humble bacteria without intelligent intervention. I assume that that was what S. Unosson was talking about also. That panorama had barely started 1 billion years ago, and most of the foundation was laid during the Cambrian explosion ca. 550 - 510 million years ago.

  • @I9s7lam5is-S3tu1pid
    @I9s7lam5is-S3tu1pid ปีที่แล้ว

    So, did Dr. Dolittle speak to the lab rats about how they felt after the scientists disrupted their blood system?
    Or did he continued to denounce his unique abilities of speaking to animals because he’ll find out they all worship their Creator?

  • @tonymaurice4157
    @tonymaurice4157 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Abiogenesis fails

  • @bornagain2641
    @bornagain2641 ปีที่แล้ว

    lmao where to go🤔
    next thing they tell the family that they passed from c19 .

  • @judaspriest01
    @judaspriest01 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    “What happens when your body is cut? Why don’t you bleed to death?” First of all the cuts from the video are superficial and in the daily life that can happen and the body responds can be enough sufficient to recover and makes more sense to be an adaptation to the environment when humans or let’s say majority of animals are living in this environment that can give you those small cuts . A bigger cut and you are done but we developed mechanisms to avoid that being a bit more intelligent and just avoid this dangerous situations using our evolved brain that learned from mistakes. Some animals just developed thicker skin . We humans have to run to the hospital to survive or we will just die no matter how much our “body emergency “ is activated. If you create this video with this idealistic situations and just point only the best and the happy endings I think is not fair at all . And on top of everything all this work that you do is today when we and animals are advanced on the evolutive scale . Sure , is impossible to go back millions and millions of years and see less complex creatures but you can make an idea . Is cute how he conclude immediately “fine tuning “ “intelligent design “ and all that but nothing about those born with congenital conditions or many many “errors “ . Is like turning your head in other directions and pretending that those don’t exist . I feel like majority of people who like the idea of an intelligent design are very egotistic and actually they just prove that they are truly product of evolution but with some cocky attitude. Honestly I prefer a “ I don’t know “ or “we have to make more research “ or “ there’s so many things that we don’t know yet “ etc instead of a cocky smile and acting like I know is intelligent design because “look here selective evidence “ or what is convenient “ evidence “ .

  • @ab-nm6xi
    @ab-nm6xi ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This argument has 2 falacies, leading to an unnecessary conclussion, which then needs explaining. 1. He considers only few known mutations. If one takes _all_ possible mutation there'd be ones that make you more fit. Fit for what? That is the second falacy. 2. If there were enough malaria around, all would die except the mutants. The mutants would be best fit, out of that small pool of mutants. And then comes the designer conclussion. But who created this nebulous designer who designed everything?

    • @josephthomasmusic
      @josephthomasmusic ปีที่แล้ว +9

      The question of who designed the designer is not the point of this video. The point of the video is to address what theory of Life best accounts for the existence of complex systems and their ability to adapt to deferring conditions.
      By the way it sounds like you're simply throwing the word fallacies around without actually giving an example of what kind of fallacy they are committing. The other problem is that when you use the term fallacies you're actually applying them onto the theory of evolution itself if they apply to Michael behe's argument. How so? Because evolution itself is the theory of survival of the fittest so if you're going to say that there's no explanation of what the mutations are fit for, then you're basically saying that evolution itself commits these fallacies also so you're actually defeating your own argument by criticizing one of the fundamental points of evolutionary theory itself. Which in turn actually grants Dr Behe's point. So your argument ends up defeating itself in the process.
      The point in regards to mutation is that the term beneficial mutation ends up becoming a very subjective term because beneficial conditions for mutations can vary depending on different variables. This is why Dr behe takes all mutations into account because all mutations can either be neutral, beneficial, or non-beneficial. His point is that the issue lies on the subjectivity on what qualifies as a beneficial mutation. Evolutionary biologist keeps shifting this definition around all the time for different species which on the surface makes sense because each species evolves differently, but we're also trying to understand an all-encompassing theory as to how life in general evolves. So therefore we need to have a more fixed definition across the board. Dr behe is saying that that is not consistent especially in terms of different evolving systems and how different mutations function beneficial in one's instance but non-beneficial in another.
      So no he's not committing any fallacies he simply pointing out that there is an inconsistency with what evolutionary biologists are trying to categorize as beneficial versus non beneficial mutations. It's not consistent across the board which makes the account for evolutionary biology even weaker.

    • @peternyikos8020
      @peternyikos8020 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I saw a reply to you a few minutes earlier, and it disappeared somehow.
      Its gist was that whether a mutation is beneficial, neutral, or deleterious depends very much on the environment. Malaria is a prime example: the sickle cell trait is beneficial only where malaria or some other parasite that lives in red blood corpuscles and needs oxygen is rampant. Otherwise it is slightly deleterious, as the video points out.
      MOREOVER, even in a malaria infested environment, it is only beneficial to those who are heterozygous for the trait (in Mendelian terms, hybrid between normal and carrying the trait). Those who are homozygous are at a disadvantage,
      on the average, even in comparison with those who have malaria: they have sickle cell anemia.
      And so, you are incorrect in saying "if there were enough malaria all around, all would die except the mutants." Terrible though malaria is, it is not generally fatal, and its effects can be mitigated with quinine and other drugs.

    • @WilsonFox123
      @WilsonFox123 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I love being an Agnostic also my below comments hasn't got nothing to do with your post.
      Spaces may be the final frontier but it's made in a hollywood basement also Never A Straight Answer.
      Level Earth, Level Water, Ice Rink & Ice Resurfacer.

    • @imafeltersnatch7634
      @imafeltersnatch7634 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@josephthomasmusic ALL experiments start with the beginning. Randomly jumping in a Making a claim is the typical creationists style.

    • @josephthomasmusic
      @josephthomasmusic ปีที่แล้ว

      @@imafeltersnatch7634 All the evidence shown in this video and yet you want to double down on this still being an assertion with no evidence presented. Your comment is a prime example of confirmation bias.

  • @copisetic1104
    @copisetic1104 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Proper Protein folding by chance has the odds of base10 to the 164. (Stephen Meyer PhD) Darwin was cooked years ago, simply by protein folding.

  • @seaknightvirchow8131
    @seaknightvirchow8131 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have wondered how materialists can deny teleology in the face of the immune system, coagulation, cell biology, complex eco systems and all the rest of nature. Even allowing for chemical evolution or abiogenesis, ridiculous as that might be, why would evolution go beyond bacteria? Why should evolution eventuate in consciousness, abstract thought, art or poetry.

    • @rubiks6
      @rubiks6 ปีที่แล้ว

      There's no such thing as "nature." Everything you see, _everything,_ is designed by a person with a mind. Nothing is natural. Since nothing is natural, there is no such thing as "nature."

    • @TheGuy..
      @TheGuy.. ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rubiks6 Paul disagrees. He says, "the natural man receives not...". Natural is just a reference of the created universe...that which is not spiritual.

  • @delmonjuntak9855
    @delmonjuntak9855 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nabi iglesia

  • @sharletbenson4723
    @sharletbenson4723 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    there is a Creator

  • @praxitelispraxitelous7061
    @praxitelispraxitelous7061 ปีที่แล้ว

    Climbing mount improbable. One , succesful tiny step at a time … 💩

  • @michaelgonzalez9058
    @michaelgonzalez9058 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You are equivalent

  • @theinnerscience3
    @theinnerscience3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Shaabaashi hai Judge ko.

  • @ingenuity168
    @ingenuity168 ปีที่แล้ว

    Designed by evolution after billions of years.

  • @rubiks6
    @rubiks6 ปีที่แล้ว

    People instinctively (for lack of a better term) recognize design when they see it but some people suddenly get stupid when evaluating a living system. I think this is feigned ignorance.

  • @mikeyerian2562
    @mikeyerian2562 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    How timely, since everyone who got the C19 shot is developing clots.

  • @praxitelispraxitelous7061
    @praxitelispraxitelous7061 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It must be so embarrassing for Darwinists having so astonishing design staring them directly into their face while they are trying to look away

    • @hammalammadingdong6244
      @hammalammadingdong6244 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      No, it's not embarrassing to use objective evidence to understand reality.

    • @peternyikos8020
      @peternyikos8020 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@hammalammadingdong6244 So please tell us about this objective evidence, and why you think Behe's evidence is not objective. Is your evidence enough to explain how Darwinian gradualism was enough to produce our entire biota, humans included, from bacteria?

    • @TheGuy..
      @TheGuy.. ปีที่แล้ว

      @@peternyikos8020 They grunt and run, lol...sad.

  • @praxitelispraxitelous7061
    @praxitelispraxitelous7061 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How do Darwinists think, once upon a time it was a protovascular system without a blood-clotting system ?

  • @WilsonFox123
    @WilsonFox123 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Spaces may be the final frontier but it's made in a hollywood basement also Never A Straight Answer.
    Level Earth, Level Water, Ice Rink & Ice Resurfacer.

    • @therick363
      @therick363 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      And yet you never have any pictures of how this supposed flat earth looks….
      You never explain away things like gravity….

  • @jasonlambert2226
    @jasonlambert2226 ปีที่แล้ว

    I feel like this channel I biased against Darwinian evolution.....😜

    • @rubiks6
      @rubiks6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ummm ... ya think?
      Why aren't _you_ biased against Darwinian evolution?

  • @Paul-qr7hu
    @Paul-qr7hu ปีที่แล้ว

    Great content, but stop with the face masks already.