I GOT COOKED BY MY FANS! For My O'Malley vs Dvalishvili Scoring Video? My Reaction!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ก.ย. 2024
- I made a video yesterday saying that O'Malley vs Dvalishvili was a robbery because I thought that Sean won rounds 1, 3 and 5 based on damage and my fans DESTROYED me in the comments, this is my reaction, let me know what you guys think in the comments section down below.
Join The Beanie Cult to get access to members only live MMA Q&A Streams / @the-mma-guru
Like and subscribe! - กีฬา
![[TH] RNT vs SPG - VCT Ascension Pacific - Day 1](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RUTkf8Detj8/mqdefault.jpg)
Thanks for keeping me in check I guess. I thought we were still using damage first scoring (turns out we aren't anymore)
The funniest part about all of this is that I legit thought that I was cooking with the video, spent like 7 hours getting all the shots and making the presentation with a smile on my face like I had just invented the cure to some illness, just to get trashed bad.
First
When has damage been the main scoring criteria? Sean had 1 7 second moment in the 5th, Merab cooked him the other 24 minutes and 53 seconds, just admit you glaze fighters that talk to you?
Just admit you were wrong. Rather than continuing to dig.
*STOP THE BOATS*
When dricus got the take downs against Strickland it count huh?
😂😂Good man, that's why I watch you mate. Never afraid to laugh at yourself, bless :)
You had a mental breakdown and not once thought where's shmitty??
Don't mess with them Gegorgians!!
You are amazing 😂
@@jokesonyou5629you too babe 😅
I love this hahahaha
I just called to say I love you
Not a single thought for schmitty in this whole video. Disgusting
Really is sad
@@omarisawesome1996 absolutely horrible. How can anyone even sleep at night knowing no one spared a thought for the schmitmeister
And he basically made the fucking video
Schmitty is a lesser. Peon if you will.
@@user-vf1of9gw2h schimmty is no pleebian
Schmitty made this video fucking massive
Did you once stop to think about schmitty?
BUT NO ONE FOR A SECOND THOUGHT ABOUT SCHMITTY?????
Schmitty texted guru he loved him
@@thomasschreiber104He didn't wanna put extra stress on him
Not JUAN person!
The most positive development is he learned how to edit a video.
Finally
Shit I wish I knew how to edit lol
I like the long form stream of consciousness videos.
Nah he just made a PowerPoint that's not editing
They call him One Take Guru
First time a pig was cooked without an apple in its mouth
He had eggs in his ass instead
He had eggs in his ass instead
😂😂😂
Hahahahhaa
You stole my comment 😂
“It feels like America just lost the war” MMAGURU 2024 🐽
Good one
Lmao 🤣 🤣
My boy said “ I spent hours on this so yall won’t comment that I was wrong , TRUST!”
@@dennisrodriguez7217 Still yet to have an actual counter argument
I respect Guru for not taking sponsors. Thank you for keeping the videos clean porky
Jon Jones is gay part 5 sponsored by corn nuts, corn to the core
MEXICAN STREET CORN CORN NUTS FOR WHEN JON JONES SLAMS HIS CORN NUT SHAPED HEAD OFF THE HOOD OF A COP CAR IN ALBUQUERQUE NEW MEXICO
Unlike his diet lmao
Who was lining up to sponsor a scruffy walrus? 😄
@@paulie.walnuts2838Bruv MMA Joey has had sponsors before. Companies will sponsor literally anyone if it will get them money.
Worst cope since JRE watched DDP destroy Izzy
He didnt destroy Izzy, was pretty competitive.
@@xeta180 he rocked him and made him tap and was up on the scorecards and made him cry at the press conference, ddp indeed destroyed him mentally and physically
@@xeta180idk ab that one
Bro watched 3 minutes of each video
Ehh okoye was worse
Guru actually seemed bothered by the comments. Never thought I'd see the day
The Niko Avocado of the fight gayme
This just seems like a “what’s a catch” situation from the nfl. I quickly read over the judging criteria and it’s pretty vague. I think this could spark some very interesting conversations about judging and the rules.
High IQ take.
the criteria isn't just vague and subjective there's too much of it. No one can actually use the criteria properly when watching a fight live it's effectively useless. If you need to watch the fight in half speed for hours to determine a winner it's obviously a flawed way to score fights
Crashout on stream yesterday was amazing 😂
Honestly that’s what he gets for doubling down I thought he was gonna get over it a couple hours after the fight but no he double down on it which made most of us angry like bro learn to move on.
Guru crashouts are my favorite
@@mrdisaster5880learn to stop being hardheaded 😂 he keeps doubling down because y’all STILL saying merab dominated him like it wasn’t a close fight
@@OutWitzed and you are backing him up because you are bias fanboy honestly even fighters are saying the same thing we are saying the only people saying the opposite is guru and y’all fanboys.
@@OutWitzed either way moaning and whining won’t undo what’s done part of being a man is to know when to move on specially in an already lost war.
Someone once said when the comments are overwhelmingly on one side there’s some truth in it. Who said that again?
Doesn’t apply to him I guess only schmitty lol
Comments of casuals who think potato head will do something to jon jones potato heads IQ is like 10
Did you not once think that Schmitty said it?
It's incredible your falling for it
Nah not with mass suggestion and mass psychosis like during covid. Dumb dumb
Lmao Guru got cooked 🐽
Some sauce with your grilled Guru sir?
Most overused word of 2024 "cope"
I'll order the bbq baby back Guru ribs
@@roymarthkirby428... With a bakers dozen of Merab kisses to bless the backside of the ribs.
Popular opinion means nothing in a world of idiots.
Guru is now Luke Thomas with his Covid vaccine apology video.
Bro really interpreted the phrase "damage triumphs over all" as "damage is the only thing that matters".
Well seeing as control time is only really supposed to be counted in the absence of damage
@@danmoore1427 Isn't control time to be counted/evaluated "when damage is considered equal"? (Control time = not actively pursuing submissions, holding ur opponent down)
Those two things literally mean the same exact thing in this context. If damage is present, that is the only thing scored. If damage is not present or equal, you move to secondary criteria being aggression and if aggression is equal aswell, you judge tertiary being octagon control. It literally says the main thing determining effective striking/grappling are strikes or sequences that would most likely contribute to a potential finish
bro I'm not tryna triple down but "triumphs over all" is pretty clear wording...
If we are just going by damage, no way did ddp win against strickland. All you need to do is look at their faces after the fight.
Hot tub changes a man....
I think the main point you forget is that literally no one in real time thought Sean had even a chance to get the decision.
Yep, not one single person thought OMalley won. Guru came out with a strange take not thinking he would get cooked for it?
True. Merab clearly won at the time when watching it, picking it apart with anxiety for hours after lol
Yeah this is what confuses me. He keeps saying “why isn’t anyone actually telling me why they think Merab won rounds 1 or 3”, and it’s like dude lol you had the same opinion when the fight happened. Everyone was in agreement. Do we just think no one pays attention the first time that they watch a fight? The idea that you unlock some true ending for watching it a second time is very strange to me.
@@brennanbarber7469 How is that strange to you? You'll notice things you missed when you rewatch the fight that's just duh obvious lol??
I tought omalley did more dammage, but the judges were gonna give it to merab, cuz in ufc hugs equals beating the shit of the dude being hug.
Guru = "There not counted" on Take Downs
NSAC = The National Sporting Arts Commission (NSAC) uses the following criteria to judge MMA bouts:
Effective striking and grappling: These are the primary criteria for judging.
Effective aggression and control: These are the secondary criteria for judging.
Impact: Judges assess if a fighter significantly impacted their opponent, even if they didn't dominate the action. Impact can include swelling, lacerations, and diminished energy, confidence, abilities, and spirit in the opponent.
You're clearly riding it so hard you've lost the basics of the rules. You're a fan boy that passes off opinion as facts. You made an entire video and response video claiming you proved someting, yet you admitted at the end you have no clue what you're talking about. Glaze, cope, cook, you're a leach. Nice teeny words! Get back to admitting it's your opinion and stop acting like you know more than everyonne. You dont!
"Impact can include swelling, lacerations" Merab took more damage
Effective grappling is not what you think it is but I agree with the part about Guru acting like his opinion is the only one that matter whereas due to the subjectivity of the scoring system you can just as easily justify Merab winning both the 1st and the 3rd round
@@jokingbird I'm not here to argue the outcome. I'm just stating he claims it's not part of judging but it is. He used his grappling to take him down and control him. Anyway regardless of all that. I don't hate either fighter nor do I hate guru. I just think he's far too cocky and wrong when it comes to trying to technically break down shit. Also he's trying to get clout, I get it, but. The honest reaction would've been, so called best striker in the division couldn't do shit for 2:50 each round before merab took him down. But relationship don't allow that.
@@BigJoe2600 valid opinion
@@tanishazoa138 I pretty much only referred to the part where you count takedowns alone as effective grappling whereas it is more so what you do with them after that counts other than that again I agree that it is extremely stupid of guru to act like there is only one way to judge that fight 🤦
nah these dudes are a bunch of wannabes scoring fights on vibes and not the actual rules. The same dudes youll see trying to pretend like they are more hardcore than you for pretending to be excited for lamos vs jandiroba
It's these little kids from twitter who just got into the sport acting like they actually know how MMA works
Damn I’ve never seen someone try inhale meat like you do
@@icyfrostaye1109 damn ive never seen someone fail try write sentence like you do
@@Sth863🎯.. couldn’t have said it any better. The new gen fans weird af. They think these goofy TH-camrs know more than the actual fighters, coaches, and people who been callin the fights the last 20 years. No one in that arena thought O’Malley won.. wasn’t even close
@@Tr5x5 Me when I score fights based on vibes:
Guru really thought his fans used logic
Knees to the thigh are damage.
Those shoulder smooches only grazed him
@@omarisawesome1996So should toe stomps be counted? Punches to the thigh? What about kicks to the arm?
Bro gave O’Malley two rounds for landing a couple extra medium shots meanwhile in those same rounds merab was molesting Sean on the ground for multiple minutes 😂 multiple minutes of ground control>a couple extra medium strikes
Blame/read the criteria, that’s how they are worded
@@jokingbird only if you wanna read it that way. Merabs sub attempt was the closest either got to immediately ending the fight in round 1.
@@Kimura1313 well that's kind of the point that they are subjective and you may think the sub was closer than some strike etc and someone else may have a different view it's just silly to act like there is only one way to score the fight when the criteria are purposefully vague 🤷
@@jokingbird yeah so if everyone in unison agreed that Merab won and even when you break it down frame by frame to argue for O’Malley and it’s still a toss up. It’s obvious Merab won.
@@Kimura1313 majority is not always right and I personally can see the argument for both and I'm a bit biased against people not looking for a finish so while I personally prefer what Sean did in rounds 1 and 3, 3:2 Merab is probably the most just outcome. What I hate though is how stupid the criteria are that basically don't allow for draws in any category and then you are forced to nitpick the strike counts etc
bro really made a 52 minute long video about this
Yes he is shocked about his fans not getting damage based scoring he is right on rds 5 and 3 just not 1
Based, I wish it was 3 hours long
@@mooserocka522 49-46
Sean must be riding him well
Bro was deleting tf out of comments
We turned him into a brisket 💀
more like pulled pork
or a bacon
Wish my beech would defended me as much as guru defends omalley
Its a shame were talking about all this. Merabs the champion. Every fight he took he delivered, against the promotion of his opponent, recently against staf. Turned champion money so he wouldnt have to fight his friend. Knowing he was the best in the division and had the balls to play the long game. Talk about a fucking stud. Good god can we stop coping for the 2nd place guy already.
Damage > Threat of a finish (flash knockdown/deep submission) > Significant Strikes > Successful takedowns > Effective Grappling/Sub attempt(s) > Ground Control > Cage control
It goes down lineally people.
you made this up
O’Malley wasn’t landing damaging shots
Good visualization is to use a 10 point judging like they do for rounds but for each criteria.
Damage - Sean (10) Merab (9)
Sig Strikes - Sean (20) Merab (18)
Grappling, TDs and Ground Control - Sean (28) Merab (28)
Cage control - Sean (38) Merab (37)
*Just an example if you care to give Merab a 10-8 in the grappling category (which i personally don't) a 10-8 is a ragdolling with no threat from the opponent
@@RyanMockleror simply google it yourself..
@@RyanMockler He didn’t dumb fuck look at the mma rule book
Guru saying that “I use to make fun of Sean, so I’m not glazing” is the same as Dana saying, “Jones and I use to not get along, so I’m not glazing” Glazing is glazing
Guru never had the makings of a varsity athlete
quasimodo predicted all this
@@Dongchalk 🤣🤣
💀💀💀
It was a very difficult situAYtion
Moral of the story: you can bully people into doing the right thing.
like oofing themselves?
@@abcdef-o2uyes. Public shame brings results. If that's the end goal, they shouldn't have been so garbage as a human. Not bullying people is why we have dudes cutting their dicks off and being praised for it.
If you want to use damage based scoring as the ONLY METRIC (which is just wrong (which is what you’re doing even though you said damage “first” scoring you’re treating it like damage “only”)) then Merab wins from the knees to thigh alone. That greatly contributed to stopping O’Malley from getting up to speed or from throwing his teeps frequently or well, meanwhile O’Malley couldn’t even hurt Merab besides for that body blow round 5. What did Sean’s clean head strikes actual do to Merab in terms of damage vs Merab STOPPING Sean from throwing teeps? Just cause they were clean and stung Merab does not mean it was good damage because you couldn't even call Merab "rocked" or "wobbled" from any of them. Just because the damage wasn’t visible to our eyes from those knees doesn’t mean it isn’t there. I doubt Sean would ever show the fans but I bet his thighs were black and blue after. 4-1 Merab and if you REALLY wanna go based on your criteria then *maybe* 3-2 Merab. Disagree with you but still appreciate you and *most* of your content. Will still be watching. I'm glad you kept the video up and you're defending yourself.
Youre a bafoon read the scoring criteria and shut your mouth.
I agree with Guru kinds on this one, but the DDP glaze era was real
putting the effort in a one hour video if sean won or not doesn't change the fact he lost it won't get his belt back anytime soon if ever!
Your live chat will stroke your ego they can not think objectively for themselves hence why they regurgitate your opinion and humor with every $5 donation.
another hour long coping session? this is getting too pathetic man. Hopefully you get back to normal
The main issue is that people say it’s damage based scoring and damage over everything when that’s actually not the case. It’s *Impact* based scoring which comes from Effective Striking/Grappling.
Impact includes swelling and lacerations as well as the diminishing of the opponents energy, confidence, abilities and spirit. Which is exactly what Merab did.
Neither O’Malley or Merab’s striking did anything to damage the other significantly or lead to the end of the fight with immediate damage. But Merab’s grappling did diminish O’Malley’s energy, confidence, abilities and spirit which is why I believe he won R1
Youre right, you named the video wrong.
If you named it :
"Fat MMA-fanboy has terrible take after 7 hours"
We all woud have been fine
Is commenting on videos a full time job? You've got insane numbers
Those are rookie numbers
@@shootamcgaven7452is being gay your fulltime job?
Youve got insane numbers
@@CccKkkk-f4j Is being terminally online exhausting?
@@shootamcgaven7452
He's been on the platform for 8 months and He's commented 88 times on this channel.
That's 11 times a month. There's nothing crazy about that.
I can only imagine how he would’ve reacted if Adesanya beat Dricus if he’s doing all of this over O’Malley.
Dricus was winning that fight on judges cards anyway so i guess we'll never know
@@joehogan8013 you pay for mma guru + lol
@@joehogan8013 I never implied that izzy was winning, I just said “imagine if he did win” BIG DIFFERENCE 🇿🇦
@@stew369 That is true in fairness, if DDP beat Izzy the way Merab beat O'Malley, he'd be one of the people arguing DDP 5-0... 4-1 if generous'
@@joehogan8013 yeah but its unfair because duckless got to kiss his coach and izzy didnt have his dog in his corner to kiss
bro deleting comments already lmao
Yt deletes comments especially if you directly trash talk people (personal attacks). I've gotten popup warnings and clicked post anyway, they usually get auto removed. Certain words are now guaranteed to get comments ghosted from my exp
did u watch the video loser?
No one seems to remember the mmaguruclips era
Was good shit, his o malley vid on the munhoz fight was his most viewed back then
Re-watched round 1. This is my opinion based on logic and not blind hate
Merab light strikes- +32
Medium strikes- + 2
Heavy strikes - + 0
Sean- light strikes- + 15
Medium strikes-+ 4
Heavy strikes- + 0
I even included O’Malley 1st light kick during Merab’s meltdown with Tim. Yes over 70% of Merab’s blows came in the last 2 mins and yes I did count Merab’s 9 knees as light strikes. Merab more than doubled Sean’s light strikes but Sean doubled Merab’s medium strikes. When striking is this close the next criteria is grappling, and Merab won that. For these reasons I had Merab winning round one and thus the fight. Close fight tho
Shoutout from Wyoming! It was just bad timing Guru. You called it like you did, then went on the podcast, then flip flopped immediately 😆 I don't know why everyone's so salty about Guru's simple change of opinion on this. Guru was rooting for O'Malley to win during the whole fight...
Striking wasn’t one sided enough in the first or third to give it to o Malley when merab also had striking success AND success in the grappling. That’s my take 3-2 or 4-1 merab
If the first AND third weren't enough then what round are you giving him to say your take is that it could've been 3-2, just curious.
@@the-mma-guru My impression is that @LeftLaneMMA essentially means to consider the score 4-1. The 3-2 possibility they mention might likely just be a consolation score for O'Malley "at best". That would make sense, but thats just me
@@the-mma-gurujudges stealing the fight
Not to mention merab also land on the clinch he also have more strikes landed add that to control, submission’s attempt that were successful plus takedown but this guy won’t even try to see how merab won the fight he was just checking what Sean didn’t do wrong and ignoring the work that merab put into the funny thing is that he showed his point doing the same thing he gives weasel shit for doing which makes him a hypocrite on top of everything.
@@the-mma-guru In my opinion o Malley did more in r3 then he did in r1 with the punches on the feet and the sequence at the end of the 3rd so you can give him that round.
People forget you pressed O’Malley about losing to Chito and clowned on the Ecuadorian toe kick
He pressed?
He literally was sole person actively defending sean 2 malley on tgat "lucky toe hitting the nerve" and saying "well hit it again chito, ita easy"
Piggy was sean 2 malley fanboy from beggining
It was well deserved roasting. Now you can come back to reality.
I thought the video was legit , these leg huggers are killing the sport . They need to have consequences for missing shots or we might as well just start following sambo
I think grounded knees become legal in November. And it depends on the fighter, some like fluffy and Islam and arman he’ll even umar and kamaru are entertaining to watch wrestle.
The whole "erm Ive criticized omally before so you cant say im glazing" is a weak excuse, your cticisims softened massively since he beat sterling, and its been nonstop dana tier just glazing him trying to get back on his good side.
No dude he has been insulting him regularly all the time. How can you get on someone's "good side" after insulting their wife?
Making fun of someone fucking his wife is definitely not a great way to be cool with someone
Preach 🙌
@@societyisscaredofmasculine8546 youre wrong on the first one, and on the second one you cant get back on someones good side after insulting their wife, which makes the groveling and glazing even more cringe.
I agree with homie ^ - Guru doesn't give a shit about being in the good graces of fighters. He's undefeated on the mic, more hate would just mean more views and $$$. Guru is a goat living under a bridge, he can't be got.
Guru almost seemed like he was on the verge of crying in this video. Chin up Guru, we still love ya.
This is why comments mean nothin most of the time 😂 yall speak out ya as
“Make Press Conference Great Again”
Shmittty 2024
You're a real one, Guru. It's the main reason why I am here. Please never change.
Uff , delete this
We all can just agree to disagree but I don’t see O’Malley appealing this decision or Tim Welsh saying robbery at any point
Sellout.
Guru - if me and Sean get locked in a room nobody is walking out
Pretty sure big John McCartney invented the rules we go by today and he has explained that damage trumps all many times in the past
Genuine question, has the scoring changed since the GSP lay and pray era? I thought they (/most commissions) had since identified damage > control in recent years but I have no proof. Happy for someone to clarify.
Bro admitted to deleting comments 🤣
insane how most MMA fans either do not understand the scoring criteria of their favorite sport or blatantly ignore it. Damage> everything else. control time means nothing unless damage is completely equal. even if damage is equal immediate damage trumps cumulative damage
True that but also the line about going to the other criteria only extremely rarely if the damage is absolutely even is pretty stupid but that’s the criteria we are given and based on them there is at least an argument that O’Malley won
the fuck do you mean we dont understand it? Get mad at the judges since you seem to think you know more about scoring than they do. We understand it by seeing the outcome of a fight and how the judges score it. whatever youre fantasizing about it clearly isnt what is actually used in the sport...
Define damage.
Bro damage is literally never mentioned in the rules. Be better than this
Actually go and look it up yourself, it's not damage, it's EFFECTIVE STRIKING / GRAPPLING. Otherwise what you said is correct
"Damage" based scoring is just something everyone parrots but it's wrong because it doesn't fairly consider tight submission attempts
Guru sucks
Do the judges get to watch any clips between rounds? Or just all live scoring? This was fun, keep doin em.
I was so disgusted, i didnt even watch the video. Makes sense
The timing of the video was just bad also the fact that just watching the fight it was clear marab won dominantly with a little bit of pushback from Omaly in rounds 3 and 5
Hey guru, here’s an unpopular comment. There’s a lot of negativity on TH-cam, and when your content is mainly negative (but funny af and entertaining), you’ll be pulling in a lot of negative commenters.
Don’t take it to heart because the internet is made for funny shits and giggles and people hate on people because they can it’s twisted and entertaining. I don’t think you deserve the hate, I think people and even these commenters will still watch your videos. They may even still post negative comments on future content to come, but they don’t really mean it they’re just being stupid and it’s entertaining.
But yeah piggy, you’re the best mma content creator on TH-cam. Thanks for helping to save the UFC. See you at the top haha
Wow what a ghey comment
👊👊 hope he reads and understands this.
This is so funny hearing Guru read out comments that I was in stitches over on my own yesterday 😂 cheers brother good shit
Your logic makes no sense. The reason there are other criteria in the rules is for fights like this, where the damage exchanged is negligible. O’Malley and Merab exchanged some pot shots on the feet and you’re trying to gas light the fans into thinking that those exceed O’Malley getting put flat on his back, gassing and quitting.
And the brutal knees (about 40 of them) don’t count but some little pussy leg kicks count as a clean strike lol. And the 13 knees and 2 or 3 takedowns in round 1 don’t outweigh sugas 2 strike advantage in the round lol.
SEAN BARELS BREATHING AFTER 10 MINITES OF FIGHTING MEANS NOTHING BECAUSE HE THREW 3 JABS MORE!!!!!!!!!!!!
Porky The Schmitty Guru
Btw damage is not only based on how clean the punches or kicks were but how much impact they had which is judged by the opponents reactions to those shots
Thank you God for this comment. No one seems to understand what the word damage means.
You mean like knees to the thighs which EVERYONE said Suguh didn't look like himself, couldn't move and waa flatfooted?
You mean like knees to the thighs repeatedly which caused Sean to not look like himself, be able to move, plant feet, and made him look flatfooted?
@@twentytwenty3511 sure that can count towards damage! Though it was merabs erratic movement that got Sean to stand still. But yes if I hit you in thigh so much it limited your movement that counts as damage. I think you think we're defending Sean in this and your mistaken 😂
@@datdude15 10-4 👍
ppl still don’t understand that damage is the very first criteria you score a fight on, if 0 damage is done or it is absolutely equal with the damage then u move onto the other criteria like control time and dominance but only if no one wins the damage, big john has explained this 6000 times
The only real cringe to me is that you’re making this about you.
Joshua beat Dubois too based on damage based scoring right 😂
You aight guru. Don’t sweat
pigs famously don't. look it up.
@@johnsun3854 he’s also quadriplegic so he’s probably not getting enough physical activity in to sweat
Guru doesn’t realize that the escape to a tight guillotine is going to your back. Merab DID have a tight guillotine which is why O’Malley turned onto his back giving Merab top position. It was only after O’Malley did that did Merab let go. O’Malley is an experienced enough submission grappler to know when to go to his back to escape a dangerous guillotine attempt.
Damage is the 1st criteria, not the only criteria.
Main criteria. Everything else comes into play if damage is equal.
Exactly this man gets it is not like Sean landed a lot either.
@@fattony5826 Yes, everything comes second to damage if damage is even. O’Malley had clear more damage in 1,3, and 5
damage is the main criteria to judge effective striking. Holding and sitting in guard which is what Merab was doing is NOT how effective grappling is scored which is why O'Malley won the rounds on "damage" even tho he did virtually none
"Damage trumps all" is literally the rule.
we love you guru, but this was an absolute brick, never seen a worse miss
the comments were brutal but funny
Piglet
If O’Malley and jones walk into a room we all know O’Malley walks out - guru
... With kisses on his back and evidence of multiple cream pies
Guru's still coping & the DDP v Strickland argument is good however him accepting that he's been cooked means he hasn't fallen off. Bro is redeemable
Piggy has never kissed a girl or driven a car 🤣
Atleast your dumb comment is funny ❤😂
you said you only score control time in close rounds. at 14:00 you called the rounds o’malley supposedly won “close rounds”. merab smashed o’malley. merab takes 1 and 3 because the striking was close enough even by your numbers, and merab had more control time if you include the back control in round 1 like bedtime said. PHD in o’malley meat riding.
Close in strike stats but not the main criteria which is damage.
An interesting factor. The linch pin of both videos is “damage based” from Guru, as it should be. However, with an admission (and one that I agree with) that everything scoring wise on Guru’s behalf had to be scaled down to begin with because nothing in this fight from either guy landed with any real ‘power’. This leaves us with an odd situation where we have to subjectively assess what’s damaging in rd 1 & 3 when nothing really was, from either fighter (relative to the bombs we see from our favourite fights on a regular basis). Thats a tough ask to begin with but not impossible. I think the egregious misstep was downgrading the few control time moments and guilly attempt (whether or not it was used as a utility for position in the end doesn’t cancel it out totally as an attempt). Because it disallows scoring to flow down to secondary criteria due to arguing that say, ‘we can’t go to control and subs, minor strikes etc’ when the first criteria “damage” or “impact” was in Sean’s favour. I just don’t think it was. Even with the system Guru has used. Sean’s lack efficacy with striking in rd 1 & 3 is glaring. While being able to label them as clean, glancing, impact etc. It’s all so low tier in damage that I don’t think it matters. All this ramble is to say that. I get ya mate, I do. I do not want Merab as champ and fuck me was I tempted to break my neck dissecting this too. Just think you missed this one chief. Doesn’t matter, don’t need the explanation. You can be right, you can be wrong. Onto the next vid, who gives a fuck anyway… Well we do because we love the UFC but you get my drift.
This is the best comment on here.
If we’re scoring based on damage alone then round 2 & 4 should be 10-8 merab
Round 2:
Merab- 65 strikes 3:12 control time
O’Malley- 6 strikes 😂
Round4:
Merab- 74 strikes 3:37 control time
O’Malley- 7 strikes 😂😂😂
bro's listing strike totals as his only argument in 2024 😬😬😬
That's actually a good point. The damage differential in those two rounds was insane.
@@Rule34Artist. no need to further elaborate. O’Malley threw 6 pillow hands all round. His best shot was a sucker punch to the back of merabs head and he didn’t even rock him. Literally everyone rocks merab except O’Malley so no damage from O’Malley. Merab 10-8 pure domination
@@MMAMonke You're just copping out lol. Break the fight down round by round using the scoring criteria like you're supposed to. Notice how you won't
@@Rule34Artist. yea it was 10-8 by definition mate lol
10-8 Round
A 10 - 8 Round in MMA is where one fighter wins the round by a large margin. A 10 - 8 round in MMA is not the most common score a judge will render, but it is absolutely essential to the evolution of the sport and the fairness to the fighters that judges understand and effectively utilize the score of 10 - 8. A score of 10 - 8 does not require a fighter to dominate their opponent for 5 minutes of a round. The score of 10 - 8 is utilized by the judge when the judge sees verifiable actions on the part of either fighter. Judges shall ALWAYS give a score of 10 - 8 when the judge has established that one fighter has dominated the action of the round, had duration of the domination and also impacted their opponent with either effective strikes or effective grappling maneuvers that have diminished the abilities of their opponent. Judges must CONSIDER giving the score of 10 - 8 when a fighter shows dominance in the round even though no impactful scoring against the opponent was achieved. MMA is an offensive based sport. No scoring is given for defensive maneuvers. Using smart, tactically sound defensive maneuvers allows the fighter to stay in the fight and to be competitive. Dominance of a round can be seen in striking when the losing fighter continually attempts to defend, with no counters or reaction taken when openings present themselves. Dominance in the grappling phase can be seen by fighters taking DOMINANT POSITIONS in the fight and utilizing those positions to attempt fight ending submissions or attacks. If a fighter has little to no offensive output during a 5 minute round, it should be normal for the judge to consider awarding the losing fighter 8 points instead of 9. Judges must CONSIDER giving the score of 10 - 8 when a fighter IMPACTS their opponent significantly in a round even though they do not dominate the action. Effectiveness in striking or grappling which leads to a diminishing of a fighter’s energy, confidence, abilities and spirit. All of these come as a direct result of negative impact. When a fighter is hurt with strikes, showing a lack of control or ability, these can be defining moments in the fight. If a judge sees that a fighter has been significantly damaged in the round the judge should CONSIDER the score of 10 - 8.
Guru being crushed is so hilarious 🤣😂 good to see him taking this well and with honor but bruh what do you expect? This is the fan base you nurtured. Its like when a rabid pack of coyotes turn on their leader
It's like at the end of the movie when the cronies turn on the head villain cause they had enough of his shit.
Dude doesnt realize hes an incel leading a group of incels together lol
It’s true. All the good people in my life have no idea who the MMA guru is 😆
@@highlybaked8417fact - you forgot to type sheesh cope and glazing + cooked
I, too, thought you were trying to get in thick with the crew. But watching this, I kind of felt bad for you, piggy. Keep making the breakdown vids I'll keep watching
If it’s damage then Strickland won
Guru would be a good hog to ride into battle cause he would terrify any enemy with his loud oinks 🐷
Could you help me with why he has acquired the nickname piggy?
Whether you think O'Malley won or Merab won you cant call it a robbery
The problem is: control time, agression criteria do not just come in when the damage is 100% exactly even. Rounds 1 & 3 were clearly close enough damage wise to where grappling & control time have to be considered. So no, Sean did not win those two rounds just bc. he may have slightly outdamaged Merab _ he was losing in all other criteria categories. That’s exactly why it looked to everyone (Sean and Timbo included) like Sean was losing
This exactly is the correct argument for Merab winning.
At the same time I think it’s fair to say there IS enough separation of damage in 1 and/ or 3 to score for Sean but that is ultimately judges interpretation of the rules and fair either way ( lame answer)
Personally live I had damage too close in round 1 to ignore the grappling.
Also people need to remember fights are scored live by human beings and the “vibe” atmosphere and fighters expressions and faces and reactions to shots DO inherently play a part in their decision especially in close rounds,
Really basic stuff that people don’t want to understand
First logical take
You're misunderstanding the rules. Damage is the main factor to look at when scoring effective striking. Guru's saying that in 1 and 3 Sean's effective striking was more than Merab's effective grappling. Because remember damage is pretty much all you look at when determining effective striking. WHERE AS simply taking someone down and getting control time on them like Merab is NOT how you score effective grappling. So no you don't have to look at aggression or ring control imo
@@jond.7808 finally some sense
The copium overdose right here 😂 Guru is giving off Kamala Harris vibes past 2 days, hey everyone Economy is actually doing great 😅
Boy oh boy, where do I even begin. MMA Guru… honey, my pookie bear. I’ve loved you ever since I first laid eyes on your TH-cam channel. The way you break down fights and strike fear into the hearts of clueless casuals. Your silky smooth predictions, and that gorgeous commentary. I would do anything for you. I wish it were possible to freeze time so I would never have to watch a UFC event without your live reactions. You had a rough start, but you never gave up grinding. You are even amazing outside of MMA, with your humor and authenticity-you’re basically a father figure to us all. I forever dread and weep at the thought of you ever retiring from TH-cam. I would sacrifice my own life if it were the only thing that could put a smile on your beautiful face. You’ve given me so much joy, and heartbreak too, like when you roast my favorite fighters. I remember when you made fun of Paddy, and it felt like my world was shattered, but I couldn’t help but admire your wit. Even though you call out all the fighters I love, deep down, I know my glorious Guru is always right. I just wanted you to stay the same, never change. Then alas, you did something legendary, calling out the corruption in MMA judging, and I rejoiced. The UFC may be hard to watch sometimes, but with you, it’s always an experience. You came through for us, Guru, with those spot-on predictions and the humor that keeps me coming back. I couldn’t believe it when you nailed that upset prediction, I was crying, bawling even. Not only have you changed the way we view MMA, but you’ve changed my world forever. And now you’re getting bigger, more popular, but still the GOAT, my GOAT. I love you pookie bear, my glorious king, MMA Guru. 😊❤🫶🏼
Hahahaha! Cooked! We still love you MMAG!
Who’s we?
Your breakdown with garbage because you did a lot of convincing instead of conveying.
Send me an email when you have an apology video posted. Shame on you, omalley must have shared alot with you. You sound like a used car salesman trying to be a lawer in a judge judy episode.
Typical Michael Scott response. We are all Dwight Schroots.
Bro really said " I don't glaze O' malley"💀
Hes talked so much shi about sean
Ur a disappointment as a concious organism.
Honestly hard to believe when he is still talking about it he is just to childish the right thing to do is to move on at this point even the people that are on his side are gonna get tired of this shit eventually.
Guru with his endless repetition that i went to their podcast n I trashed them is his only line when his fans called him out. He thinks his fans are stupid n will buy in whatever he tricks them with.
funny how the only people bringing up scoring criteria and damage are the ones leaning more towards o’malley
You mean the people who actually read the rules and dont just score on vibes?
No shit merab fans are blindly glazing him
@@loismylaneNo the ones who realize if you take 15 knees to the thighs you can't do a mile in 12 minutes wet brains
@@metaknight3874 merab has no fans😂 we just saw him won its not that deep anyone who thinks omalley won is fuckin delusional
Running outta content I see
This content is great imo
We needed you to make that video. That fight can’t go unnoticed. People just don’t like Sean
😂😂😂 cope
wtf
he froze mentally and physically because he feared takedowns, got out grappled and couldn't adapt to merabs movement.
Bro, he clearly lost. No matter how we score the fight, he looked absolutely aweful in that fight. Thats a fact.
Merab was dancing and kissing, while OMalley even forgot to feint, or how to throw combinations.
I think some of the hate comes from an influx of georgian fans brought in by the Topuria championship win, they've jumped onto the Merab bandwagon and glazing him beyond belief not knowing shit about the scoring system
"Dude, in the comment section lies the truth, a lot of the time. You gotta see it, you gotta go; "this is bullshit." But some of it's correct. Like, as you said [Schmiddy/Guru], you know you shouldn't have done it, so the hate comments are correct. For now. But you know, you make a funny joke in a next pod/vid, and everybody's gonna be like; "Heh, that was kinda funny. We like this [Schmiddy/Guru] guy again...""
- The MMA Guru
We stand with Gurusalem 👊
GAIPAC
👊