1) How did you enjoy Garrett's performance? I loved the close-up and visual nature of this act! 👍 2) Want to learn some cool magic tricks from me? My favorite effects? I've made several such tutorials already... Join my Patreon to start! ➠ www.patreon.com/JasonParker --- Social media & Etc --- INSTAGRAM: instagram.com/JasonParkerMagic TWITTER: twitter.com/JasonParkerNow
He lied the last part. He had two rings. The ring that teller examining doesnt open up. The palmed ring does open up. Solid cant go thru solid.no sleight does that. Teller examined a normal ring. Gimmick was palmed. He didnt tell that.
He obviously uses two rings. One is solid and one is open. But he changes them really quick. So in the beginning Teller only is allowed to check his right hand, because in the left hand he hides the open version if the ring.
He actually did a podcast with one of the producers of the show explaining how fool us is run. The discussion between penn, teller and the producers takes about ten minutes before they tell the producers how they think it was done, they get ONE chance to get it. If they get it wrong, they have been fooled no matter what. The producers then figure out a way for Penn to communicate how they thought (incorrectly) it was done to the performer, who says no and they get the trophy moment. Penn and Teller are at no point told how it is done until after the show, if they ask, and they very rarely do, due to professional courtesy. The producers are told exactly how it is done, and shown twice in a row so they can figure out the best presentation of the effect for the studio audience and the TV cameras, so the illusion isn’t spoiled accidentally. You also have to bear in mind that Penn & Teller only see the routine once in real time, and don’t have the luxury of replays and slow motion.
The Moment you realize that the producers of fool us is gathering the worlds biggest magic trick database together, incl. realy good ones which even master magicians like Pen and Teller doesn't know! 😳 This business model is the real magic trick!
@@mdotadotj9751 No, he literally just rotates the half a ring to slide it to the next finger. Notice how 3:43 - 3:58 he never lets go of the ring, because his middle finger at the moment is is being pressed against the half a rings opening. 3:42 you can also see from the camera angle he has 2 rings. I saw them with my very first time of watching the performance. With pausing you see everything.
I think Penn was still speaking in code. He asked him if "that ring", the one in his hand, was gimmicked. They saw no switch which means the ring in his hand needed to be real for it to be sleight of hand. He knew exactly what he was asking. Amazing sleight of hand.
Exactly right... When the trick is done with sleight of hand, Penn and Teller have to actually see the move for them to not be fooled.. otherwise just about every trick they could just say "sleight of hand" and never be fooled lol I'm pretty sure they've stated this before like with Shin Lim... They knew he was doing sleight of hand but they couldn't actually catch some of the moves which means he fooled them
I'm a bit mixed on this. A linguistic victory in some context, but he still said the words ''if you can tell us that was done in anyway other than pure sleight of hand, then we're not gonna lie, you fooled us''. He didn't actually answer penns question. Just said ''That is a completely normal ring'' which means he didn't fool them, he just never owned up to Penn being right by avoiding the topic like a politician xD. 3.56 at 0.25x speed, yeah I spoiled it for myself but you can clearly see that ring open on tellers finger.
@@lawrencewhiting4927 I dunno. A con is different than a trick, but that's kinda weak even for a con. The question was if it was done in anyway other than pure sleight of hand, and only part of it was, probably done after the performance while he's waiting for the judges decision.
You guys are getting it. The ring at the end was real. That's all that matters. If he had a gimmicked ring or what I believe was a half ring, they didn't see the switch. One of the other replies clarifies this. They saw nothing, they made sure they said that to him. He was able to switch from a real ring to a gimmicked ring and back. That's sleight of hand and they didn't see the switch. He fooled them.
My Dad always used to say that too Jason, 'Before you argue with someone, walk a mile in his shoes'. Because that way, if you do have a bad argument, at least you're a mile away. And you have his shoes.
I think the key was Penn referenced "THAT ring". I think they know there was a second ring, but since he so cleanly handled everything that it was perfect slight of hand and that's why they gave it to him. Since the gimmicked ring was already away somewhere, he's not lying by saying that ring is not gimmicked. Just my thoughts.
I disagree I think he straight up lied. That make zero sense that they knew about both rings and were only referencing the one if you think about it a little harder I'm sure you'll realize that makes zero sense
@@sonicenamdtwice8584 I hear what you are saying, but what makes me think this is that Penn first starts, ...you have a ring that is carefully constructed.... Then at the end he specifically says that ring. The trick is impossible in the sense that a solid ring isn't going to go through Teller's finger (or anyone's), so I can only think that Penn is giving him an out. I'm probably totally wrong, it's just the way he started with a ring then switched to that ring that bothers me. Of course he may have straight up lied as you said in which case I hope someone from fool us comes out and says something since that feels wrong to let it go.
@@sonicenamdtwice8584 You can't lie on this show - the producers know how the trick is done and will overrule a false positive and false negative. It's been done before with the female French magician and the cards in the bag. She thought they figured it out, and P/T were overruled and made them go back and give her the trophy.
clearly at 3:42 there are two metal parts or rings if you slow it down in his hand. It can be seen for a fraction of second right there. Same at 4:05, there's clearly a gap in the ring and it seems he hands over the same ring to Teller. Weird
@@thehandleisuseless Prosthetics? you're so fried ahaha that was SOH a full ring and a half ring. 3:17 you can see him slip his pinky out of the ring he already had on to show the audience before slipping it back in and then moving the half ring off his other finger.
The thumb trick paired with Teller’s finger I personally feel is enough to conclude he’s using at least 2 rings. One is definitely normal though. Regardless he’s on another level!
this man did this for me one day!!! i was at a fair and him and another magician i knew were there and he showed me this about 7 years ago! i was like IS THAT THE GUY? LOL
I think it is important to note that Penn's wording was "If you had that ring gimmicked in any way..." in reference to the ring given to Teller and "If it is anything other that a ring that comes apart" referring more to the trick as a hole. The first statement could have been arguably beaten with a simple swap that P&T admitted to not have been able to catch. The second statement however was more definitive and was responded to with "It does not come apart." That rules out any break in the opening up of a solid ring. I think it is safe to assume that more than one ring, or partial ring was used, but that none of them had any moving parts to them.
He is clearly using a gimmick half ring and a regular ring. His sleight of hand is near perfect while he hides the other ring. However, just as he gets ready to put the ring on Teller's finger, the revealing camera angle shows both rings being placed into his right hand. You can see this at 3:42. Teller couldn't see it, nor could Penn and the audience. It was just a fluke that the camera caught it. If you watch closely at 4:09 he pockets the gimmick .
Iv watched video of the moving ring , which means he lied to Penn about the gimick... But the judges know how its done, so curious what happened here ... if he had to return the trophy ...
4:00 and on, watch slowly. He opens the ring, takes it off his finger, switches the rings, holds fake ring in left hand, hands him the ring with right hand, then drops hand to his side and pockets fake ring. It took me awhile to crack this one! He is very good with his slight of hand.
There is no opening. There’s a half ring and a whole ring. The half ring is in front of Teller’s finger and the whole ring is behind, he essentially spins and switches them in this move.
@@maccharalambous2851 clearly at 3:42 there are two metal parts or rings if you slow it down in his hand. It can be seen for a fraction of second right there. Same at 4:05, there's clearly a gap in the ring and it seems he hands over the same ring to Teller. Weird
clearly at 3:42 there are two metal parts or rings if you slow it down in his hand. It can be seen for a fraction of second right there. Same at 4:05, there's clearly a gap in the ring and it seems he hands over the same ring to Teller. Weird
I saw him live recently. The trick is just as insane up close. Like just watching his hands even doing basic, non magic things is crazy. He is awesome and I definitely recommend going to see a show.
I watched the finger removal thing at .25 speed and you can see he bends his finger away, but he does it so perfectly so that it is always hidden either by his hand or by his other fingers. Good thing he knew what camera angle was going to be used because I imagine it would be ruined if seen from most other angles. Still, amazingly well done.
7:23 its a camera trick, see the texture of his palm, slightly different when the camera switch angle,its like his palm has a pocket to insert his finger , its like theres a jump cut editing
Mike Close (the backstage judge who knows the ins and outs of the trick before he goes on stage) went on a podcast and said that the trick is done with a non gimmicked ring and a secondary tool that helps him make the deception possible. The ring itself does not come apart
I've watched through this performance quite a few times, and actually seeing this "secondary tool" only makes the whole thing that much more impressive. Man, he's good.
@@1stNumberOne Yeah, I thought I saw something when he put the ring on his thumbs, thinking there had to be 2 rings for that move. When really, it's just very smooth, I saw nothing xD
@@youtubeuser3357 nope... congratulations you were officially fooled. So at 3:20 he slips the real ring he was palming on his pinky. He could have done it earlier as he had the pinky covered the whole time.. but then shows the pinky in a casual just before the reveal. That was strictly to show off to another magician. It was brilliant. Then uses that half ring on Teller. Ditches it and uses real ring for two different pass though techniques.
After he performed the missing index finger I can see how he did the rest. It was really just sleight of hand. However for the first part and the ring through Teller’s finger I really can’t understand how he did it unless he did have two rings. My feeling is that he did mix a lot of different techniques to confuse people. What a great presentation.
@TheHound Thank you for your response. Actually, I'm autistic. Perhaps I pay attention to different aspects of the performance. To me, what was most amazing was when he took off his finger. (o_o) I like to think that we all, every one of us, is doing the best we can, given what we have to work with. All good wishes, my friend. I gave you a thumbs up.
Teller get to examines right hand, then Garrett does the trick with his left hand. I think he can bend his fingers way way back. IDK how that helps with moving the across to each one. I think I saw a few frames where the ring looked like part was missing at 4:05 before he removes it and gives it to Teller
Garrett’s performance and slight of hand is amazing, I met him once and his ring was not a gimmick or it was such amazing slight of hand that he handed me a real ring he also did other tricks for other people as well
At 4:05, when he inserts the ring into his index finger right after taking it from Teller, for a couple frames you can see the ring "pop open", which he quickly readjusts by removing the ring from the finger and pressing it in a circle. You have to pass it frame by frame with the < and > keys.
I agree with the “one whole ring plus one gimmicked (half or gapped or hinged or etc) ring”. Regarding the “the ring moves from one thumb to the other” part: Both are used. The “whole” ring on one thumb, and the “gimmicked” ring on the other thumb.
He has two rings. You can even see them both a split second (3:42) when he puts the ring on Tellers finger. For the part with his Thumb: This is doable with only one normal ring if you are as nimble as he is. That is really pure sleight-of-hand.
This trick I've seen it in my home country ( Yemen) it had been done by a homeless guy seriously. If you asked me how he did it I say that's totally done through jinn ( elves ) intervention
It literally must be one normal ring and one half ring in order for Garrett to simultaneously not be lying and also be possible (along with tons of sleight of hand).
@@sonicenamdtwice8584 Not lying. Here is what Penn said: 'If it is anything other than a ring that comes apart, you have fooled us.' There was no ring that came apart.
Its two rings, one is a half a ring and fits inside the normal one, which is why he holds it in such an conspicuous and awkward way. Of course, knowing how it is done and being able to do it like he does are two different things. Superb performance. I wonder how many hours of practice he put into it.
I am watching this in slow motion and he absolutely does not take the ring off the normal way, and you can see him putting it on the next finger from the bottom. I agree with the people saying that it's not a trick ring, that he uses a real ring, and that is what he gave to Teller, and also means he did not lie, but he also uses a half ring. Technically, "Does the ring come apart" can be answered with no and still be honest if you have 1 real ring, and 1 half ring. It's still incredible sleight of hand.
@@reubendodd1664 that got debunked, there was a big controversy involving this and some other TH-cam channel where a guy posited that he lied to Penn and Teller, and both the lead judge backstage and this magician responded and said it isn't a gimmick ring, and he is answering them truthfully he uses 2 rings, one must be pinched to hold its shape, the other is a normal ring you can see him perform the switch before he places the ring on teller's finger if you watch it in slow motion, and you can see him switch it back when he hands the ring to him for inspection
If he could have done this without 2 rings then he likely could ask someone for their ring and done it. The fact that he didn't suggests he had a twin ring that was cut in half. His sleight of hand skills however are epic and what won the trophy for him. Excellent routine.
What if... as a lot of people are saying, there are 2 rings, 1 full normal ring, 1 half ring.... then none of the rings are gimmicked... none of the rings open up or something... it's just a sleight of hand switching them... right?
half ring is still gimmick, but he just use sleight of hand to switch. And if this is the case, then he has a same gimmick and act with Patrick Kun. The Halo Project.
@@tomekstec981 No, only the half ring went on Teller's finger. Watch when he puts it on, he's always covering half of it. Then watch closely at 4:01 when he twists it around before taking it off. You can see there's nothing on Teller's finger exactly where the ring should be.
I like how he talks about preferring the intimacy of close up vs stage shows. It's clear how dedicated to the "simple" craft of sleight of hand he is, and stage shows just don't give the same effect as up close.
Every time that sharp, jagged trophy of death comes down from the ceiling, I think that somebody on this show someday is going to lose an eye - and it won't be a trick!
that's the full ring. he puts it on his pinky immediately after that. you can see it a few seconds later when he is moving the fake ring from finger to finger. his fingers open up for just a frame and you can see the real ring on his pinky.
It almost did once. I can't remember which act but the trophy came down right in front of someone and one of the pointy bits of it almost stabbed them in the face.
I think any sensible person would know that there must have been a shell or a gimmick ring in the middle of the act. The fooling part was he gave out a ring for examination seemingly without a switch. That means either the switch was really really good, or the gimmick ring was crafted very very good so it can be examined (even by Teller) without giving away its secret. To say it's a pure slight of hand, has to mean he did a switch under Teller's nose without getting caught. And that is amazing.
I've known Garrett for years. He taught me many card tricks, and helped me perfect my Elmsley count when I used to go to the local magic shop here in Buffalo, NY (many moons ago. It closed down years ago because the owner died. RIP Mr. Graham.) I can say, that if he says the ring wasn't gimmicked, chances are, it was not.
@George Henry That's not what Penn tried to bust him on. Penn tried to bust him on "There is only one ring in the whole act, and it's gimmicked." Garrett won because Penn implicitly said "If you used sleight of hand to switch the rings, neither Teller nor I caught it, so you win."
@George Henry 🤣 Dude, the "150% effort" isn't a joke it's code. For how the trick is most likely done... Man, it's amazing how the loudest people are often the most dense.
@11:34 Garrett is referring *_only_* to the ring that he threw to the floor, not the *working* ring that is _rung in & out of his excellent transpositions.
There are two rings, one that is fully circular, and the other has an opening. At the end of the trick, the one with the opening is placed over the full ring and appear as one.
So here is the only solution I can think of: 1. He used not just a ring but also one or more fragments of a ring to create the illusion, that he was actually wearing the ring, which obviously was not the case. Instead he was hiding the ring in his hand. Very impressive!
Yes and handled very well. I can see the moves, palming and pinches after repeat viewings but really clean. I think what is confusing people is that Penn knows the half of reality but couldn't see the moves and then the last two pass through tricks were with a real ring. So three techniques for same illusion.
I do think so, even if I'm not a magician, I almost immediately thought the was another half, expecially the first time he did it, his thumb was incredibly close to his ring.
I saw this before and it's amazing. But... pause at 4:05 theres a gap in the ring... is that a different ring? or did Teller see this gap and find it not big enough to get anything through? I agree there has to be more than sleight of hand here
I figured it out, finally after seeing this performance 3 times. His fingers are incredibly flexible, and he is simply bending them at incredible speeds
No no. He only did that on his pinky, when he went from finger to finger it is just smart slight of hand, you can see how he does that in slow motion totally fooling the crowd, but how he got the ring of teller was the most amazing part. It has to be a gimmick,no other explanation.
@@sgtcaco I'm inclined to believe him that the ring wasn't gimmicked. That he just used pure sleight of hand when doing teller. Either that, or he swapped in an exact gimmicked replica exclusively to use on Teller
@@jeremysmith8698 you have to understand that teller ask THAT ring. He actually used the gimmick ring for the first part of the act, once he had pocketed the gimmick ring he finished the act with the normal ring. The normal ring so he did not technically lie. But he definitely used 2 rings in the first parts. You can actually see all this if you study it in slow motion. The sleight of hand is incredible.
@@sgtcaco I'd say in slow motion on the middle and pinky finger swaps you can actually see the ring is altered. You can see him closing it with his thumb on the pinky finger and you can see him sliding it on to the bottom of his middle finger at about a 45 degree angle at one point.
@@noir530 except it does because one ring is open and the other is whole. Two rings. One is gimmickry that can be passed over a finger. The sleight of hand is what is so incredible. He has gotten so good at palming the prop and showing only the whole ring. Which explains the thumb trick. Both have a ring on em. It isn’t a switch.
without seeing your comment, I also found that time 3:42.. .. you can see, there is "S"-shape .. so he had 1 gimmicked ring ... or 1 normal ring + half ring
@@DavidSmith-pg1ob clearly at 3:42 there are two metal parts or rings if you slow it down in his hand. It can be seen for a fraction of second right there. Same at 4:05, there's clearly a gap in the ring and it seems he hands over the same ring to Teller. Weird
In a podcast I stumbled across recently, Garrett said that he used a regular, non-gimmicked ring and something else. I did not say what that something else was though.
First thing I notice is how the ring is designed, 4 bands. They probably interlock, possibly the 1st and 3rd, & the 2nd and 4th inner connected. His rotational flourish is still rotational so there's probably a twisting unlock going on, kind'a like possibly Viking Magic's brass ball & tube.
Such a great understated act. Loved it, especially the finger magic. It's so nice to see some simple trick that you did when you were 5 prove to be something that can still have an impact at 50.
Look at the left hand posture at 3:24. He has half a ring that is used for moving from index to the ring finger. Then when the ring jumps to pinky, watch how he does it. Pinky goes into the palm of the other hand, and gets the full solid ring. Meanwhile, the half-ring is hidden behind the middle finger. It's a masterful switcheroo between a prop ring and a real one.
Looks to me he had 2 rings, you can clearly see one is ticker than the other, the thicker one is a real ring. The middle finger missing, is actually behind the front fingers, and then he moves it in front during transition to show it missing from the back, it's just a lots of finger training involved, he's quite strong in that area, physically strong.
milliped and pig, getting A LOT of prosciutto Also, Im confused here, there were parts that cant be done with pure SOH. Perhaps he had normal ring and a half as a gimmick, so he answered its not gimmicked about just the ring. Also, what to say, Garrett is one of the best living magicians, so long in a game, remember when I frst picked on VHS his coins transpo in spectator hands. Some really innovative shell work. Also, when he sad on his channel that one of the most respected magicians in his eyes is Brian Gillis he rased a whole bunch more in my eyes. Also allways mentioned Gillis as one of the very few for me. RIP
5:10 At this point, my guess is that Garrett made a switch right in front of Teller's (and the camera's) eyes. Used a gimmicked ring for the effect, and gave Teller a clean ring.
yea at 7:58 you can see he doesn't put the ring on to his ring finger just his pinky then makes it look like he moved it from ring to pinky with hand coverage. He then just slips it out of the pinky very quickly with a jerk motion making it look like it went through. All this means it is a second not gimmicked ring. The first gimmicked ring can be seen at slow motion being half on the next finger getting placed.
When I was a kid, I merged a monkey, lion, eagle, and dolphin, as they were my favorite animaks at the time. I called it a Molead. It was basically a winged lion with monkey hands and rail, and dolphin fins, so it could traverse trees, land, water, and air
Most times I can know what people do with slight of hand, but knowing the trick is the easy part, performing it is the hard and sometimes impossible part. #respectmagicians
This is a perfect and sad example on how misinformation spreads on the internet. One guy makes a fake claim to generate some clicks for his videos, and everybody just parrots this misinformation without thinking. Garrett did not lie. Penn said "If you did it with pure slide of hand,..., we didn't catch you on anything'. Obviously, Penn wouldn't give away the method how it was done, so the 'pure slide of hand' was code for switching between two rings. Since P&T didn't see any switching, they went for the second explanation of ONE gimmicked ring that opens up. Here Penn says 'If it is anything than a ring that comes apart, you have fooled us.'. Since he didn't use a ring that comes apart, he fooled them, and deserved the trophy. Also another point, do you really think, that they would name the episode after him (it's called 'Lord of the RIng'), if he lied to them?
Exactly : he means "We think you gave the gimmicked ring to examin and it was so well gimmicked that Teller didn't see it." And words this as implying "there is only 1 ring". If these two statement are not true Garett is entitled to the trophy. He cleverly added some tricks that would not fool them but that they know to be performed with a normal ring to muddy the water.
Yep. And one thing the other site fails to mention, or conveniently forgets, is that the producers of the show know EXACTLY how every trick is done. And they are monitoring everything. They didn't take a lunch break when Garrett got the trophy. If there was some shenanigans, they would have spoken up. I think the ring that he had in his hand at the end was not a gimmicked ring.
There was as video of how the ring seperate itself,, it the rinh was not a gimmick ring then he folled penn and teller,,,but the ring is totally a gimmick ring,, very basic how can garette take out the ring ring from tellers finger if its not a gimmick ring? Thats the issue then,,
@@teddydiychannel5673 The video you saw now has this comment from the maker of the video: "Update After reading through your response. I agree 2 rings have been used, 1 full ring and one is a half." You do not see the ring separate because no ring used in that illusion separates.
i dont know how he did slight of hand on tellers hand??? he probably has two identical rings because thats what i thought when i met him and he did it in front of me.
@@kmktruthserum9328 It kind of was sleight of hand when changing his props. I think that Penn clarified his question that if it was anything other than a trick ring they will give him a trophy and it was something else.
@@ashwinsmagicandcardistry It was not a lie. He used one and a half normal rings. He fooled Teller into believing he had a full ring on his finger. You pull that off and blow Teller's mind, you get a trophy. As Teller says, " If it is anything other than a ring that comes apart, you have fooled us.' It wasn't a ring that comes apart. he earned that trophy.
@@j.wilsoncork896 He did lie, whether the ring he handed to teller was a real one, the one he used for 90% of the tricks was his gimmicked openable ring. He sold this product and tricks to go with it. And he did technically lie if what we saw him and Penn say was true. Also back in 2019 the producer who had this rule (of being told the trick and letting P&T know the truth) passed away and the rule was changed. You can actually look that up. Don't defend a magician who lies like that so easily. That's just dumb.
1st off Penn was very narrow in his "guess". He said "that ring comes apart, by magnets or by a shell" "if there was sleight of hand involved you fooled us, because we didn't see any of it". I would say copping and getting rid of a SECONDARY gaff does not go against either of the two statements that Penn made regarding this trick. 2nd can we just take a moment to appreciate the amount of practice it takes for him to pull off some of the sleights he does in this trick? All of this with Teller standing 18 or so inches away from him burning his hands! 3rd he even was so good he still has a bunch of you fooled even after you "watched it at 0.0005 speed on youtube and saw everything". If you are saying he lied you didn't see everything, as it should be.
Think about trying this on Teller. Just sweating bullets "I know he will feel the edge, I know he can feel it's a half ring, I know he feels this, dammit I better just quit and walk off stage now, look at that look in his eyes he just felt that too"
1) How did you enjoy Garrett's performance? I loved the close-up and visual nature of this act! 👍
2) Want to learn some cool magic tricks from me? My favorite effects? I've made several such tutorials already... Join my Patreon to start! ➠ www.patreon.com/JasonParker
--- Social media & Etc ---
INSTAGRAM: instagram.com/JasonParkerMagic
TWITTER: twitter.com/JasonParkerNow
He lied the last part. He had two rings. The ring that teller examining doesnt open up. The palmed ring does open up. Solid cant go thru solid.no sleight does that. Teller examined a normal ring. Gimmick was palmed. He didnt tell that.
There is a exposed video " garett thomas revealed"
He obviously uses two rings. One is solid and one is open. But he changes them really quick. So in the beginning Teller only is allowed to check his right hand, because in the left hand he hides the open version if the ring.
That was freaking cool Jason!! You're thoughts were super nice today! Thank you
I would choose a crocodile and a python by the colours are black and white
He actually did a podcast with one of the producers of the show explaining how fool us is run. The discussion between penn, teller and the producers takes about ten minutes before they tell the producers how they think it was done, they get ONE chance to get it. If they get it wrong, they have been fooled no matter what. The producers then figure out a way for Penn to communicate how they thought (incorrectly) it was done to the performer, who says no and they get the trophy moment. Penn and Teller are at no point told how it is done until after the show, if they ask, and they very rarely do, due to professional courtesy. The producers are told exactly how it is done, and shown twice in a row so they can figure out the best presentation of the effect for the studio audience and the TV cameras, so the illusion isn’t spoiled accidentally. You also have to bear in mind that Penn & Teller only see the routine once in real time, and don’t have the luxury of replays and slow motion.
very niiice info. thanks for this
i like this format. ill start watching. seems somehow authentic
Oh, that's legit.
The only thing that ruins the not spoiling the trick part is youtube's .25x speed.
The Moment you realize that the producers of fool us is gathering the worlds biggest magic trick database together, incl. realy good ones which even master magicians like Pen and Teller doesn't know! 😳 This business model is the real magic trick!
It's so obvious he used a gimmicked teller.
He told them it wasn’t
@@dylanjmatthews you should reread the comment my friend.
In the infamous words of Colonel Nathan R. Jessup, "Is there another kind?"
I’m sure he has two rings, one real and one gimmick or cut
@@dylanjmatthews oofing woosh fam
I suspect there is 1 whole ring and another 1/2 ring. He did not lie about the 1 whole ring not being a gimmick.
I have the same suspicion.
My thoughts also
He’d have to have two half rings tho for the teller part
@@mdotadotj9751 why?
@@mdotadotj9751 No, he literally just rotates the half a ring to slide it to the next finger.
Notice how 3:43 - 3:58 he never lets go of the ring, because his middle finger at the moment is is being pressed against the half a rings opening.
3:42 you can also see from the camera angle he has 2 rings. I saw them with my very first time of watching the performance. With pausing you see everything.
I think Penn was still speaking in code. He asked him if "that ring", the one in his hand, was gimmicked. They saw no switch which means the ring in his hand needed to be real for it to be sleight of hand. He knew exactly what he was asking. Amazing sleight of hand.
Exactly right... When the trick is done with sleight of hand, Penn and Teller have to actually see the move for them to not be fooled.. otherwise just about every trick they could just say "sleight of hand" and never be fooled lol I'm pretty sure they've stated this before like with Shin Lim... They knew he was doing sleight of hand but they couldn't actually catch some of the moves which means he fooled them
I'm a bit mixed on this. A linguistic victory in some context, but he still said the words ''if you can tell us that was done in anyway other than pure sleight of hand, then we're not gonna lie, you fooled us''. He didn't actually answer penns question. Just said ''That is a completely normal ring'' which means he didn't fool them, he just never owned up to Penn being right by avoiding the topic like a politician xD. 3.56 at 0.25x speed, yeah I spoiled it for myself but you can clearly see that ring open on tellers finger.
Exactly . . . . slight of hand: there was more than one ring!
@@lawrencewhiting4927 I dunno. A con is different than a trick, but that's kinda weak even for a con. The question was if it was done in anyway other than pure sleight of hand, and only part of it was, probably done after the performance while he's waiting for the judges decision.
You guys are getting it. The ring at the end was real. That's all that matters. If he had a gimmicked ring or what I believe was a half ring, they didn't see the switch. One of the other replies clarifies this. They saw nothing, they made sure they said that to him. He was able to switch from a real ring to a gimmicked ring and back. That's sleight of hand and they didn't see the switch. He fooled them.
My Dad always used to say that too Jason, 'Before you argue with someone, walk a mile in his shoes'.
Because that way, if you do have a bad argument, at least you're a mile away.
And you have his shoes.
I think the key was Penn referenced "THAT ring". I think they know there was a second ring, but since he so cleanly handled everything that it was perfect slight of hand and that's why they gave it to him. Since the gimmicked ring was already away somewhere, he's not lying by saying that ring is not gimmicked. Just my thoughts.
I disagree I think he straight up lied. That make zero sense that they knew about both rings and were only referencing the one if you think about it a little harder I'm sure you'll realize that makes zero sense
I think thats why they have judges off stage who the magicians have to explain how it's done so you cant lie
@@sonicenamdtwice8584 I hear what you are saying, but what makes me think this is that Penn first starts, ...you have a ring that is carefully constructed.... Then at the end he specifically says that ring. The trick is impossible in the sense that a solid ring isn't going to go through Teller's finger (or anyone's), so I can only think that Penn is giving him an out. I'm probably totally wrong, it's just the way he started with a ring then switched to that ring that bothers me. Of course he may have straight up lied as you said in which case I hope someone from fool us comes out and says something since that feels wrong to let it go.
@@sonicenamdtwice8584 You can't lie on this show - the producers know how the trick is done and will overrule a false positive and false negative. It's been done before with the female French magician and the cards in the bag. She thought they figured it out, and P/T were overruled and made them go back and give her the trophy.
@@sonicenamdtwice8584 No gimmicked ring. Just a full ring and a half a ring. Here is what Penn says:
Two rings, one with a gap, one without a gap.
3:42 you can see the two rings.
4:05 you can see the gap in one ring.
Watch at 0.25x speed.
clearly at 3:42 there are two metal parts or rings if you slow it down in his hand. It can be seen for a fraction of second right there. Same at 4:05, there's clearly a gap in the ring and it seems he hands over the same ring to Teller. Weird
2:11 Teller broke his character for a third of a second.
I think the best trick was only inspecting his right hand for "prosthetics"... and then doing the whole trick on his left land.
He had a half ring and prosthetics
@@thehandleisuseless Is this confirmed?
@@enlight_8360 yep
@@enlight_8360 watch the video in slowmotion
@@thehandleisuseless Prosthetics? you're so fried ahaha that was SOH a full ring and a half ring. 3:17 you can see him slip his pinky out of the ring he already had on to show the audience before slipping it back in and then moving the half ring off his other finger.
The thumb trick paired with Teller’s finger I personally feel is enough to conclude he’s using at least 2 rings. One is definitely normal though. Regardless he’s on another level!
The gimmick is not a ring
And how many fingers?
this man did this for me one day!!! i was at a fair and him and another magician i knew were there and he showed me this about 7 years ago! i was like IS THAT THE GUY? LOL
The thumb edit at 6:24 had me laughing. Enjoyed this episode!
I think it is important to note that Penn's wording was "If you had that ring gimmicked in any way..." in reference to the ring given to Teller and "If it is anything other that a ring that comes apart" referring more to the trick as a hole. The first statement could have been arguably beaten with a simple swap that P&T admitted to not have been able to catch. The second statement however was more definitive and was responded to with "It does not come apart." That rules out any break in the opening up of a solid ring. I think it is safe to assume that more than one ring, or partial ring was used, but that none of them had any moving parts to them.
He is clearly using a gimmick half ring and a regular ring. His sleight of hand is near perfect while he hides the other ring. However, just as he gets ready to put the ring on Teller's finger, the revealing camera angle shows both rings being placed into his right hand. You can see this at 3:42. Teller couldn't see it, nor could Penn and the audience. It was just a fluke that the camera caught it. If you watch closely at 4:09 he pockets the gimmick .
Yep, that is it. Thx.
Bingo
It's a normal ring as he said in the end. If it wasn't the judges would have intervened, if he somehow pocketed it.
Iv watched video of the moving ring , which means he lied to Penn about the gimick... But the judges know how its done, so curious what happened here ... if he had to return the trophy ...
@@bikeadventuresokanagan9293
They asked, is *that* ring gimmicked and he said *this* ring is a normal ring.
4:00 and on, watch slowly.
He opens the ring, takes it off his finger, switches the rings, holds fake ring in left hand, hands him the ring with right hand, then drops hand to his side and pockets fake ring.
It took me awhile to crack this one! He is very good with his slight of hand.
Legit that was a good catch myg
Then how did he get the solid, non-gimmicked ring off of or on Teller's finger?
There is no opening. There’s a half ring and a whole ring. The half ring is in front of Teller’s finger and the whole ring is behind, he essentially spins and switches them in this move.
@@maccharalambous2851 clearly at 3:42 there are two metal parts or rings if you slow it down in his hand. It can be seen for a fraction of second right there. Same at 4:05, there's clearly a gap in the ring and it seems he hands over the same ring to Teller. Weird
clearly at 3:42 there are two metal parts or rings if you slow it down in his hand. It can be seen for a fraction of second right there. Same at 4:05, there's clearly a gap in the ring and it seems he hands over the same ring to Teller. Weird
I'm trying to *smash* Like, but I'm having some issues with my thumb . Help!!
I saw him live recently. The trick is just as insane up close. Like just watching his hands even doing basic, non magic things is crazy. He is awesome and I definitely recommend going to see a show.
I watched the finger removal thing at .25 speed and you can see he bends his finger away, but he does it so perfectly so that it is always hidden either by his hand or by his other fingers. Good thing he knew what camera angle was going to be used because I imagine it would be ruined if seen from most other angles. Still, amazingly well done.
7:23 its a camera trick, see the texture of his palm, slightly different when the camera switch angle,its like his palm has a pocket to insert his finger , its like theres a jump cut editing
Mike Close (the backstage judge who knows the ins and outs of the trick before he goes on stage) went on a podcast and said that the trick is done with a non gimmicked ring and a secondary tool that helps him make the deception possible. The ring itself does not come apart
I've watched through this performance quite a few times, and actually seeing this "secondary tool" only makes the whole thing that much more impressive. Man, he's good.
@@Gamefailer so what was it? It’s TH-cam, what’s the deal?
@@1stNumberOne Yeah, I thought I saw something when he put the ring on his thumbs, thinking there had to be 2 rings for that move. When really, it's just very smooth, I saw nothing xD
@@Gamefailer yea nvm I figured it out. Took some digging but I got it. Yea he’s slick
@@1stNumberOne what did you find out?
I LOVE watching real pure slight of hand tricks. The amount of skill just astounds me.
Gimmick ring. He lied to Penn .-.
@@coleeg69 He did not lie. There is no ring that opened up. 'If it is anything other than a ring that comes apart, you have fooled us.'
@@youtubeuser3357 nope... congratulations you were officially fooled.
So at 3:20 he slips the real ring he was palming on his pinky. He could have done it earlier as he had the pinky covered the whole time.. but then shows the pinky in a casual just before the reveal. That was strictly to show off to another magician. It was brilliant. Then uses that half ring on Teller. Ditches it and uses real ring for two different pass though techniques.
Its a gimmick ring. It opens up slightly, he forgot to cover it when he put it on tellers finger.. which is why the guy didn't get the trophy.
@@Tankedmosquito You do realize he did get the trophy...SMH.
After he performed the missing index finger I can see how he did the rest. It was really just sleight of hand. However for the first part and the ring through Teller’s finger I really can’t understand how he did it unless he did have two rings. My feeling is that he did mix a lot of different techniques to confuse people. What a great presentation.
He has two rings. The one on tellers finger is cut in half, and the whole ring is in his hand.
clearly at 3:42 there are two metal parts or rings if you slow it down in his hand. It can be seen for a fraction of second right there
That's in the top 2 or 3 most impossible things I've ever seen. POWER to Mr. Thomas!
@TheHound Thank you for your response. Actually, I'm autistic. Perhaps I pay attention to different aspects of the performance. To me, what was most amazing was when he took off his finger. (o_o) I like to think that we all, every one of us, is doing the best we can, given what we have to work with. All good wishes, my friend. I gave you a thumbs up.
"...one ring to rule them all, and in the darkness bind them." It was obviously forged in Mordor, using magma from Mt.Doom.
Teller get to examines right hand, then Garrett does the trick with his left hand. I think he can bend his fingers way way back. IDK how that helps with moving the across to each one.
I think I saw a few frames where the ring looked like part was missing at 4:05 before he removes it and gives it to Teller
He is holding two rings there, one right next to the other. The whole one is further inside the two fingers.
I love how he tells teller to examine his hand carefully and then does all the trick on the other hand
how did he put half a ring on tellers finger without teller noticing, impossible
He had a solid ring (maybe two). He also had a solid half ring. He also had some pretty slick slight of hand.
Seeing him live is so fun. He used to these tricks at a restaurant near me every week.
Seeing people live is pretty cool, but I usually stay for the aftershow and see them die too.
did you know there are people out there who dislike magic? Can you imagine being so bereft of imagination, hope and lacking the ability to dream?
His sleight of hand is insane man....watching him do the missing finger bit so convincingly is awesome...
Garrett’s performance and slight of hand is amazing, I met him once and his ring was not a gimmick or it was such amazing slight of hand that he handed me a real ring he also did other tricks for other people as well
At 4:05, when he inserts the ring into his index finger right after taking it from Teller, for a couple frames you can see the ring "pop open", which he quickly readjusts by removing the ring from the finger and pressing it in a circle. You have to pass it frame by frame with the < and > keys.
The magic of technology reveals all and trumps the human.
clearly at 3:42 there are two metal parts or rings if you slow it down in his hand. It can be seen for a fraction of second right there
His ring truly didn't have any gimmick. Very good sleight of hand. He used props but the props didn't have any gimmick.
Lmao😂that ring was so gimmicked i even saw a video exposing him
Its 2 rings, ones solid, the others not. His slight of hand is still masterful. I don't know how he transfers so fast and unseen.
Great video! Thanks!
I agree with the “one whole ring plus one gimmicked (half or gapped or hinged or etc) ring”.
Regarding the “the ring moves from one thumb to the other” part:
Both are used. The “whole” ring on one thumb, and the “gimmicked” ring on the other thumb.
He has two rings. You can even see them both a split second (3:42) when he puts the ring on Tellers finger. For the part with his Thumb: This is doable with only one normal ring if you are as nimble as he is. That is really pure sleight-of-hand.
Totally enjoyed it. Unbelievable how it was done. How he did the missing finger showing both sides. Unbelievable
This trick I've seen it in my home country ( Yemen) it had been done by a homeless guy seriously. If you asked me how he did it I say that's totally done through jinn ( elves ) intervention
@@rakan550 lmao yeah sure, he just dislocated his finger moron
It literally must be one normal ring and one half ring in order for Garrett to simultaneously not be lying and also be possible (along with tons of sleight of hand).
It was two rings but that doesn't mean he wasn't lying he absolutely was lying.
@@sonicenamdtwice8584 Penn said they didn't see any sleight of hand. So if he was switching between a real ring and a half ring, he 100% fooled them.
@@sonicenamdtwice8584 Not lying. Here is what Penn said: 'If it is anything other than a ring that comes apart, you have fooled us.' There was no ring that came apart.
@@thatotherkyle YEP! That is why he got a trophy.
I have the same conclution but I needed to watch it three times. But I'm sure that's the secret a full ring and a Half ring switching between them.
Its two rings, one is a half a ring and fits inside the normal one, which is why he holds it in such an conspicuous and awkward way. Of course, knowing how it is done and being able to do it like he does are two different things. Superb performance. I wonder how many hours of practice he put into it.
Piece of paper printed to look like half a ring
Lol nice conspiracy theory 😂
I've watched the original Garrett Thomas video multiple times and never noticed the thumb thing until I watched this video and you pointed it out.
I am watching this in slow motion and he absolutely does not take the ring off the normal way, and you can see him putting it on the next finger from the bottom. I agree with the people saying that it's not a trick ring, that he uses a real ring, and that is what he gave to Teller, and also means he did not lie, but he also uses a half ring.
Technically, "Does the ring come apart" can be answered with no and still be honest if you have 1 real ring, and 1 half ring.
It's still incredible sleight of hand.
It's incredible sleight of hand
Watch 3:56 to 3:58 and play in .25 speed you can see a hinge open on the ring on tellers hand, it's a gimmicked ring
@@reubendodd1664 that got debunked, there was a big controversy involving this and some other TH-cam channel where a guy posited that he lied to Penn and Teller, and both the lead judge backstage and this magician responded and said it isn't a gimmick ring, and he is answering them truthfully
he uses 2 rings, one must be pinched to hold its shape, the other is a normal ring
you can see him perform the switch before he places the ring on teller's finger if you watch it in slow motion, and you can see him switch it back when he hands the ring to him for inspection
If he could have done this without 2 rings then he likely could ask someone for their ring and done it. The fact that he didn't suggests he had a twin ring that was cut in half. His sleight of hand skills however are epic and what won the trophy for him. Excellent routine.
"any art form is just an excuse to meet another human being"
wow, never thought of it that way, not wrong
I think the key is, Penn asked, "If you have *that* ring gimmicked in any way..."
What if... as a lot of people are saying, there are 2 rings, 1 full normal ring, 1 half ring.... then none of the rings are gimmicked... none of the rings open up or something... it's just a sleight of hand switching them... right?
half ring is still gimmick, but he just use sleight of hand to switch.
And if this is the case, then he has a same gimmick and act with Patrick Kun. The Halo Project.
@@hectormedinae.876 But the whole ring was on Penn's finger, they weren't switched there.
@@tomekstec981 No, only the half ring went on Teller's finger. Watch when he puts it on, he's always covering half of it. Then watch closely at 4:01 when he twists it around before taking it off. You can see there's nothing on Teller's finger exactly where the ring should be.
@@hectormedinae.876 well penn also mentioned a shell being used, which basicly is a half ring
One observation is Teller examined his right hand then he did the trick on his left hand .
yeah his left fingers are detatchable
@@duncanmagee that makes sense.
what's the difference between banded and mercuring by Jay Sanky?
I love this guy’s reaction videos .. basically just watches with us with zero insights. Too much work he does indeed
I like how he talks about preferring the intimacy of close up vs stage shows. It's clear how dedicated to the "simple" craft of sleight of hand he is, and stage shows just don't give the same effect as up close.
Every time that sharp, jagged trophy of death comes down from the ceiling, I think that somebody on this show someday is going to lose an eye - and it won't be a trick!
the real sleight of hand was producing the ring which Teller examined....still so well done that if they didn't see it in person then he got them!
3:42 you can see 2 rings in his right hand as he is reaching for Teller's finger.
If you slow it down to .25 speed you can see a flash of something in his right hand at 3:01
that's the full ring. he puts it on his pinky immediately after that. you can see it a few seconds later when he is moving the fake ring from finger to finger. his fingers open up for just a frame and you can see the real ring on his pinky.
3:20 you can see him slide the real ring on his pinky
One of these days that trophy is going to come down and kill the fooler.
It almost did once. I can't remember which act but the trophy came down right in front of someone and one of the pointy bits of it almost stabbed them in the face.
🤣
@@thesammyjenkinsexperience4996 jandro
@@XavierArnau399 Yeah that's probably the one I am thinking of. Wow, that really did come close to poking him in the eyes.
I think any sensible person would know that there must have been a shell or a gimmick ring in the middle of the act. The fooling part was he gave out a ring for examination seemingly without a switch. That means either the switch was really really good, or the gimmick ring was crafted very very good so it can be examined (even by Teller) without giving away its secret.
To say it's a pure slight of hand, has to mean he did a switch under Teller's nose without getting caught. And that is amazing.
I've known Garrett for years. He taught me many card tricks, and helped me perfect my Elmsley count when I used to go to the local magic shop here in Buffalo, NY (many moons ago. It closed down years ago because the owner died. RIP Mr. Graham.) I can say, that if he says the ring wasn't gimmicked, chances are, it was not.
@George Henry Where is the lie, he has two rings - swapping between them is slight of hand.
@George Henry The ring is solid, it's not gimmicked. He just had to put in 150% effort to pull it off.
@George Henry That's not what Penn tried to bust him on. Penn tried to bust him on "There is only one ring in the whole act, and it's gimmicked." Garrett won because Penn implicitly said "If you used sleight of hand to switch the rings, neither Teller nor I caught it, so you win."
@George Henry 🤣
Dude, the "150% effort" isn't a joke it's code. For how the trick is most likely done... Man, it's amazing how the loudest people are often the most dense.
Beside the magic itself the whole storyline just cracked me up, I loved every part of the act. Bravo!
@11:34 Garrett is referring *_only_* to the ring that he threw to the floor, not the *working* ring that is _rung in & out of his excellent transpositions.
4:05 opening on the ring as it slides onto his index finger.
"that" ring doesn't come apart. he did swap it out, he's that good.
The magician already gave us the answer. We are just too focused on the performance. Let me speak in code, uhm
MOVE THE FREE FINGER, RING NEVER LEAVE.
hi would you ever upload your workout routine?
There are two rings, one that is fully circular, and the other has an
opening. At the end of the trick, the one with the opening is placed
over the full ring and appear as one.
So here is the only solution I can think of:
1. He used not just a ring but also one or more fragments of a ring to create the illusion, that he was actually wearing the ring, which obviously was not the case. Instead he was hiding the ring in his hand.
Very impressive!
clearly at 3:42 there are two metal parts or rings if you slow it down in his hand. It can be seen for a fraction of second right there
Totally agree with you on this one, there's at least half an extra reality here
Yes and handled very well. I can see the moves, palming and pinches after repeat viewings but really clean. I think what is confusing people is that Penn knows the half of reality but couldn't see the moves and then the last two pass through tricks were with a real ring. So three techniques for same illusion.
I do think so, even if I'm not a magician, I almost immediately thought the was another half, expecially the first time he did it, his thumb was incredibly close to his ring.
Two different rings.. but , sleight of hands Amazing
I saw this before and it's amazing. But... pause at 4:05 theres a gap in the ring... is that a different ring? or did Teller see this gap and find it not big enough to get anything through? I agree there has to be more than sleight of hand here
There's no gap stupid
clearly at 3:42 there are two metal parts or rings if you slow it down in his hand. It can be seen for a fraction of second right there
I subbed , you are so worth , your channel is amazing , i like your videos ❤️
put in 0.25 replay speed, at 4:05 you can see ring is not whole, it has a cut out.
Still impressive
I figured it out, finally after seeing this performance 3 times. His fingers are incredibly flexible, and he is simply bending them at incredible speeds
No no. He only did that on his pinky, when he went from finger to finger it is just smart slight of hand, you can see how he does that in slow motion totally fooling the crowd, but how he got the ring of teller was the most amazing part. It has to be a gimmick,no other explanation.
@@sgtcaco I'm inclined to believe him that the ring wasn't gimmicked. That he just used pure sleight of hand when doing teller. Either that, or he swapped in an exact gimmicked replica exclusively to use on Teller
@@jeremysmith8698 you have to understand that teller ask THAT ring. He actually used the gimmick ring for the first part of the act, once he had pocketed the gimmick ring he finished the act with the normal ring. The normal ring so he did not technically lie. But he definitely used 2 rings in the first parts. You can actually see all this if you study it in slow motion. The sleight of hand is incredible.
@@sgtcaco I'd say in slow motion on the middle and pinky finger swaps you can actually see the ring is altered. You can see him closing it with his thumb on the pinky finger and you can see him sliding it on to the bottom of his middle finger at about a 45 degree angle at one point.
@@Phlegm187 , clearly at 3:42 there are two metal parts or rings if you slow it down in his hand. It can be seen for a fraction of second right there
@3:42 seems to have two rings.
Which still wouldn’t explain this Witchery!!!
@@noir530 except it does because one ring is open and the other is whole. Two rings. One is gimmickry that can be passed over a finger. The sleight of hand is what is so incredible. He has gotten so good at palming the prop and showing only the whole ring. Which explains the thumb trick. Both have a ring on em. It isn’t a switch.
without seeing your comment, I also found that time 3:42.. .. you can see, there is "S"-shape .. so he had 1 gimmicked ring ... or 1 normal ring + half ring
At 4:08 he slaps his hands together as if they are empty, but the half ring is apparently in his left hand. He sneaks it into his pocket at 4:09 .
@@DavidSmith-pg1ob clearly at 3:42 there are two metal parts or rings if you slow it down in his hand. It can be seen for a fraction of second right there. Same at 4:05, there's clearly a gap in the ring and it seems he hands over the same ring to Teller. Weird
ive watched this so many times and it is this viewing just now where I saw the second ring.
What’s that book you read at the end??
3:41 in slow u can see 2 rings in his hand ... sadly the angolation of camera was wrong for him but nice performance
Yeah half ring and a whole ring.. sleight of hand
3:39 hahaha good choice! 😄😄
This magicians magic is cool!
In a podcast I stumbled across recently, Garrett said that he used a regular, non-gimmicked ring and something else. I did not say what that something else was though.
clearly at 3:42 there are two metal parts or rings if you slow it down in his hand. It can be seen for a fraction of second right there
First thing I notice is how the ring is designed, 4 bands. They probably interlock, possibly the 1st and 3rd, & the 2nd and 4th inner connected. His rotational flourish is still rotational so there's probably a twisting unlock going on, kind'a like possibly Viking Magic's brass ball & tube.
The ring isn't gimmicked at all
How did he cut off his finger? Is it a mirror sleeve ?
If you slowmo the video you can see him flip his finger that fast. Its speed and flexibility reliant only.
Right when I saw the performance, I knew Jason would surely react. What a great performance and skill.
Such a great understated act. Loved it, especially the finger magic. It's so nice to see some simple trick that you did when you were 5 prove to be something that can still have an impact at 50.
Random answer:
Saltwater Crocodile and a Bald eagle. That baddie would rule both the sky and the ocean.
A Bald Eagle Body with a German Shepherd Head. Watching from the Philippines. Thank you for posting this video Sir.
Look at the left hand posture at 3:24. He has half a ring that is used for moving from index to the ring finger. Then when the ring jumps to pinky, watch how he does it. Pinky goes into the palm of the other hand, and gets the full solid ring. Meanwhile, the half-ring is hidden behind the middle finger. It's a masterful switcheroo between a prop ring and a real one.
Looks to me he had 2 rings, you can clearly see one is ticker than the other, the thicker one is a real ring. The middle finger missing, is actually behind the front fingers, and then he moves it in front during transition to show it missing from the back, it's just a lots of finger training involved, he's quite strong in that area, physically strong.
milliped and pig, getting A LOT of prosciutto
Also, Im confused here, there were parts that cant be done with pure SOH.
Perhaps he had normal ring and a half as a gimmick, so he answered its not gimmicked about just the ring.
Also, what to say, Garrett is one of the best living magicians, so long in a game, remember when I frst picked on VHS his coins transpo in spectator hands. Some really innovative shell work.
Also, when he sad on his channel that one of the most respected magicians in his eyes is Brian Gillis he rased a whole bunch more in my eyes. Also allways mentioned Gillis as one of the very few for me. RIP
Watch 3:56 to 3:58 and play in .25 speed you can see a hinge open on the ring on tellers hand, it's a gimmicked ring
@@reubendodd1664 false
@@reubendodd1664 The producers of the Fool Us has said that the ring is not gimmmicked.
@@reubendodd1664 You see his hand hinge. Not the ring itself.
he has a half ring what he has palmed at the start, u can see him pivot the ring between his first two as he transitions it the first time
5:10 At this point, my guess is that Garrett made a switch right in front of Teller's (and the camera's) eyes. Used a gimmicked ring for the effect, and gave Teller a clean ring.
yea at 7:58 you can see he doesn't put the ring on to his ring finger just his pinky then makes it look like he moved it from ring to pinky with hand coverage. He then just slips it out of the pinky very quickly with a jerk motion making it look like it went through. All this means it is a second not gimmicked ring. The first gimmicked ring can be seen at slow motion being half on the next finger getting placed.
Does he have the ability to bend/flex or dislocate /double joint his fingers in a such a way to give the illusion that the ring went through them?
When I was a kid, I merged a monkey, lion, eagle, and dolphin, as they were my favorite animaks at the time. I called it a Molead. It was basically a winged lion with monkey hands and rail, and dolphin fins, so it could traverse trees, land, water, and air
time and a place dude, time and a place.
buddy....WHAT?
4.05 you can clearly see a gap in the ring
A platypus and honey badger. Because, well, picture a platypus with those fangs and muscle and attitude!
They are already venomous, so that is scary.
A Punny Badger... it tells dad jokes all day.
8:09 I saw that frame by frame, and it looks like he slides the ring so fast, it looks like it went through the finger.
y, clearly at 3:42 there are two metal parts or rings if you slow it down in his hand. It can be seen for a fraction of second right there
Most times I can know what people do with slight of hand, but knowing the trick is the easy part, performing it is the hard and sometimes impossible part. #respectmagicians
There had to be a switch, multiple times, for THAT ring to not be gimmicked
There you go.
This is a perfect and sad example on how misinformation spreads on the internet. One guy makes a fake claim to generate some clicks for his videos, and everybody just parrots this misinformation without thinking.
Garrett did not lie. Penn said "If you did it with pure slide of hand,..., we didn't catch you on anything'. Obviously, Penn wouldn't give away the method how it was done, so the 'pure slide of hand' was code for switching between two rings. Since P&T didn't see any switching, they went for the second explanation of ONE gimmicked ring that opens up. Here Penn says 'If it is anything than a ring that comes apart, you have fooled us.'. Since he didn't use a ring that comes apart, he fooled them, and deserved the trophy.
Also another point, do you really think, that they would name the episode after him (it's called 'Lord of the RIng'), if he lied to them?
Exactly : he means "We think you gave the gimmicked ring to examin and it was so well gimmicked that Teller didn't see it." And words this as implying "there is only 1 ring".
If these two statement are not true Garett is entitled to the trophy.
He cleverly added some tricks that would not fool them but that they know to be performed with a normal ring to muddy the water.
Agree with everything except he used "sleight of hand," not "slide of hand."
Yep. And one thing the other site fails to mention, or conveniently forgets, is that the producers of the show know EXACTLY how every trick is done. And they are monitoring everything. They didn't take a lunch break when Garrett got the trophy. If there was some shenanigans, they would have spoken up.
I think the ring that he had in his hand at the end was not a gimmicked ring.
There was as video of how the ring seperate itself,, it the rinh was not a gimmick ring then he folled penn and teller,,,but the ring is totally a gimmick ring,, very basic how can garette take out the ring ring from tellers finger if its not a gimmick ring? Thats the issue then,,
@@teddydiychannel5673 The video you saw now has this comment from the maker of the video: "Update After reading through your response. I agree 2 rings have been used, 1 full ring and one is a half." You do not see the ring separate because no ring used in that illusion separates.
Here's the secret in code : OC
I think it's : CC
Spot on with OC. Very good slight of hand
at 3:42 you can see both rings (the full ring on the inside position, the 1/2 ring about to go on the finger)
Crazy when you slow it down you can see him flipping the half ring to the next finger. Beautiful slight of hand.
Yep, at .25 speed you can see how it was done easily, still well done, the slight of hand changing rings though, slick.
i dont know how he did slight of hand on tellers hand??? he probably has two identical rings because thats what i thought when i met him and he did it in front of me.
He has a ring and a half (or a little over half). But he is incredibly good at handling his props and switching them.
@@NetAndyCz so he is a liar and it wasnt slight of hand
@@kmktruthserum9328 It kind of was sleight of hand when changing his props. I think that Penn clarified his question that if it was anything other than a trick ring they will give him a trophy and it was something else.
@@kmktruthserum9328 Not a liar.
@@TheMightyOdin he's a liar
He said its a normal ring, so if that was a lie I would think the judges off screen would have stepped in
dracopalidine apparently it was a lie. The effect is called “Banded” by Garret Thomas
Technically the ring he gave Teller at the end of the act was a totally normal ring.
That says nothing about the ring he was using during the effect.
@@ashwinsmagicandcardistry It was not a lie. He used one and a half normal rings. He fooled Teller into believing he had a full ring on his finger. You pull that off and blow Teller's mind, you get a trophy. As Teller says, " If it is anything other than a ring that comes apart, you have fooled us.' It wasn't a ring that comes apart. he earned that trophy.
J. Wilson Cork oh ok. I just saw everyone saying that he might have lied
@@j.wilsoncork896 He did lie, whether the ring he handed to teller was a real one, the one he used for 90% of the tricks was his gimmicked openable ring. He sold this product and tricks to go with it. And he did technically lie if what we saw him and Penn say was true. Also back in 2019 the producer who had this rule (of being told the trick and letting P&T know the truth) passed away and the rule was changed. You can actually look that up. Don't defend a magician who lies like that so easily. That's just dumb.
1st off Penn was very narrow in his "guess". He said "that ring comes apart, by magnets or by a shell" "if there was sleight of hand involved you fooled us, because we didn't see any of it". I would say copping and getting rid of a SECONDARY gaff does not go against either of the two statements that Penn made regarding this trick.
2nd can we just take a moment to appreciate the amount of practice it takes for him to pull off some of the sleights he does in this trick? All of this with Teller standing 18 or so inches away from him burning his hands!
3rd he even was so good he still has a bunch of you fooled even after you "watched it at 0.0005 speed on youtube and saw everything". If you are saying he lied you didn't see everything, as it should be.
Think about trying this on Teller. Just sweating bullets "I know he will feel the edge, I know he can feel it's a half ring, I know he feels this, dammit I better just quit and walk off stage now, look at that look in his eyes he just felt that too"
4:05 I see a frame where a piece is missing from the ring?