Why the Mitsubishi SpaceJet Failed

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 32

  • @michaelcurley7801
    @michaelcurley7801 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    With the composite production lessons learned from the 787 and A350 is it feasible for a single aisle composite aircraft? Or does the production efficiencies of the 737 and A320 make this concept unlikely?

    • @snorttroll4379
      @snorttroll4379 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      new clean sheet designs will come around in a few years and eat the market

    • @kenwilson9372
      @kenwilson9372 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Hondajet, C Series (a220) are two? Its more can the GKNs and Spirit Aerosystem have the capacity

    • @thomaskettunen3699
      @thomaskettunen3699 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@kenwilson9372 A220 is not purely composite per say. Wing and a lot of things are but the fuselage is Aluminium-Lithium alloy

    • @OOpSjm
      @OOpSjm 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No production advantage. Increase cost with nothing gained.

    • @paulbadresingh9295
      @paulbadresingh9295 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      P7

  • @NinetyTres
    @NinetyTres 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Prototypes are easy, production is hard

    • @Rotebuehl1
      @Rotebuehl1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ...not to mention the selling

    • @geargeekpdx3566
      @geargeekpdx3566 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Heinrick Fisker has left the chatroom crying

  • @rafaelwilks
    @rafaelwilks 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    3:42 it had the engine layout of the E-Jet with the luggage storage of the CRJ. What a sad irony - Mitsubishi was developing this rival to the CRJ, and it would have had a cabin wider than even the E-Jet.
    Now all they have is the narrow CRJ 😐
    4:50 if the SpaceJet succeeded, it would most likely face issues with its Geared Turbofans, but the airframe would probably have been awesome! If the SpaceJet rises again, hopefully Mitsubishi will ditch the GTF and choose GE.

  • @user-sk1eh3pg6j
    @user-sk1eh3pg6j 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I respect Mitsubishi for not rushing a faulty aircraft into production and axing it instead. That's the difference between Japanese engineering and American engineering. An American company would have put bandaids on the issues and rushed it into production knowing the potential for catastrophic mass casualties. Try again Mitsubishi!

    • @keith6371
      @keith6371 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The previous passenger plane ys11 made by Japanese, has the highest crash rate among ALL modern passenger aircrafts, including Russian ones people often laugh at. So I wouldn’t get too excited about Japanese engineering

    • @user-sk1eh3pg6j
      @user-sk1eh3pg6j 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@keith6371 That's bull💩

  • @mab7727
    @mab7727 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's really sad to see this ...

  • @NationChosenByGod
    @NationChosenByGod 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The truth is FAA does not want any rival with Boeing. That is why they killed the Mitsubishi space jet.

    • @gabrielcoelho2346
      @gabrielcoelho2346 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I despise boeing so much

    • @geargeekpdx3566
      @geargeekpdx3566 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      money concentrates power. Boeing makes more money than any of them (or did...) and they are also a defense contractor. Too big to fail? Nope. BIGGER.

  • @bricefleckenstein9666
    @bricefleckenstein9666 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It was interesting seeing this aircraft fly out of Grant County airport, where they did a lot of their FAA certification testing.
    (see the parts of the video in the 7:30 range, for a few examples of seeing the area from the sky).
    It seems that COVID and it's delays was the final blow to the program.

  • @gmh2050
    @gmh2050 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Where are the sources of your words.!!?

  • @davekidney2350
    @davekidney2350 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Too bad. But Mitsubishi had issues with their MU 2 and YS11 aircraft

  • @jorgekumagai2672
    @jorgekumagai2672 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hard lesson for underestimating and looking down on Embraer of Brazil, the third biggest aircraft manufactuer behind Boeing and Airbus.

  • @geargeekpdx3566
    @geargeekpdx3566 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As Elvis Costello once said, this beautiful plane is "Less Than (a) Zero"

  • @jimmyyang901
    @jimmyyang901 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Why? go big or go home,

  • @amandanewport9483
    @amandanewport9483 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mitsubishi was able to make a plane but it wings when on top

  • @pauloyoshizaki2103
    @pauloyoshizaki2103 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Mitsubishi Aircraft - Space - Jet : Com : Airbus : Boeing :
    Juntos : Fabricar :
    Space : Jet : Futuro : Parceria :
    Juntos : Model : Space - Jet :
    + Três : Empresas : Local : Parcerias ! : Projeto : Desenvolvimento : Até : Ano : 2035 ~ 2037 ~ Ficar ~
    Pronta ! Modelo :
    Voar !!!❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤😍🤩😍🤩😍🤩😘🥰😍🤩😘❤

  • @Embargoman
    @Embargoman 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    With Boeing's screwups seems liks Mitsubishi is looking projects to go after Boeing, when a MAX crashes in Japan.
    South Korea on the other hand will be similar like the Daewoo story as Daewoo became acquired by GM and became GM Korea and KAI becomes Airbus Korea and South Korea competes against Boeing's 737 MAX with the A320 Neo.

  • @awdrifter3394
    @awdrifter3394 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    If anything like Mitsubishi's cars, bad quality would've killed it anyways.

    • @mtadc1545
      @mtadc1545 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Mitsubishis are very reliable. Especially the Pajeros, tritons etc.

    • @user-sk1eh3pg6j
      @user-sk1eh3pg6j 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Mitsubishi's are dead reliable.

  • @jimshoe402
    @jimshoe402 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    😁😁😁😁😁😁😁