Vincent Racaniello has been one of my favourite’s to follow during this pandemic. Love his TH-cam channel. He does not get nearly as much attention as he deserves.
As a decade long This Week in Virology fan and someone wbo has watched every Columbia Virology lecture since 2015 i have to say Jillian you have seriously done the world a favor having Vincent on. Bravo
“small” side effects!? like which ones? eschemic stroke? necrosis at the injection site? limb amputation? kawasaki disease? heart attack? death? which one was “small”?
This has brought me to tears. I haven’t heard anything this clear and informative this entire time of the pandemic!! The vaccine has been such a huge stress for me and my family because my husband and I have different view points. This brings me peace and hope… thank you both so much !!
I really appreciate this conversation because it answered a lot of questions but also created many more questions, and those are usually the most valuable types of podcasts/videos for me personally. I'll definitely be digging deeper into Mr. Racaniello's channel. If people were allowed to ask questions and get unbiased, data-driven answers rather than be called crazy conspiracy theorists, get bullied into a medical decision they're unsure about, etc. then the outcome would have possibly been different over the past several months.
I have been a fan of MicrobeTV and Vincent since 2015. Watched his course every year and every: 1. This week in Virology 2. This week in Evolution 3. This week in Parasitism 4. Immune 5. Q&A with A&V Plus MedCram Covid updates 1-100+ Howard Huges Medical updares Dr. Mike Hansen UCTV Stanford Etc etx I can't imagine not having these resources!
My doctor is worried. It’s back this year and many people who usually get flu shots aren’t because they are focused only in Covid shots and scared to get both ( false info here again). I know many who are sick right now. And not with Covid
why is it so rare to hear (it was possibly even more rare when you posted this, than it is today) what you said in the intro."for the vaccinated, the unvaccinated, I respect your opinion". This is the type of discussion I want to hear. A discussion based on logic, facts and not driven by ego (I like to hear you try to fight bias as much as possible) I look forward to look at this, as I already watched mr.Racaniello on Lex Fridman's podcast, and he appeared as a respectful individual as well (I don't need to precize he also has a lot of knowledge to share). So you got my like anyways.
Excellent podcast. Jillian, you are an excellent interviewer. Really great, thoughtful questions and then you let Prof Racaniello answer thoroughly without interruption. Vincent Racaniello is a clear voice and a superb communicator of the science we so desperately need.
36:00 50% is the bare minimum to keep it on the market. that's one of the reasons the flu shot 'never' drop below. i think most hesitancy is the authoritarian push for sales; the history of these companies; the *highest level of profits in history* (not wartime 'all in this together'); & the virus doesnt harm you erally either, when it does that is also the immune system. gr8 interview. -JC
Thank you for this interview. You're a better interviewer than most journalists out there. You helped me and my sister decide to get vaccinated a few months ago because of your great interviews with experts. I got answers to my questions and was able to make an informed choice because of your podcast.
I just think its wrong to be manipulated in to getting it by governments, media etc. The way they handled this with blackmail is atrocious. Most important thing for people to know is that they have the right to choose.
What struck me about this video was the fact that Dr. Racaniello failed to mention something important: that the CDC stopped keeping track of breakthrough cases back in the Spring citing funding issues. Scott Gotlieb spoke about this on NPR in June. It is so important to share factual information when we're trying to clarify topics. We cannot leave out details...or else others (like me) don't really believe that the agenda is clear.
th-cam.com/video/lepqvdXoA2E/w-d-xo.html Senator Johnson Expert Panel on Federal vaccine mandates and vaccine injury. Covers the ‘failure’ to log adverse events. Many testimonies from the injured, including professionals and medics themselves with life changing adverse effects . No response from NIH, CDC, Pfizer, Moderna or others. Make up your own minds. Listen to former president of UK RCGPs right at the end ( 3:08: 30) She,s the same age as Vincent. Both been lifelong diligently practicing in their own fields. Yay, it,s even longer than TWiV. But the world has changed. Listen.
Breakthrough cases is a wrong phrase to use . Dr Rachaneillo is correctly against using such rubbish phrases that misheard people . He is correctly critical of CDC using this misleading term . It mislead people into thinking vaccines were not effective . Protecting against infections is not a function of vaccine it’s to kept one from going to morgue and hospital . People previously infected also keep getting covid . In fact to recent study shows that vaccine is more protective against reinfection than previous infection.
Why is it so rare to hear (it was possibly even more rare when you posted this, than it is today) what you said in the intro."for the vaccinated, the unvaccinated, I respect your opinion". This is the type of discussion I want to hear. A discussion based on logic, facts and not driven by ego (I like to hear you try to fight bias as much as possible) I look forward to look at this, as I already watched mr.Racaniello on Lex Fridman's podcast, and he appeared as a respectful individual as well (I don't need to precise he also has a lot of knowledge to share). So you got my like anyways.
From this point on, I hope people start their search for the truth in matters of biology with scientists (who aren’t paid to promote an agenda, like this esteemed guest) instead of putting their faith in politicians and biased media sources. Sad that it even needs to be said.
i appreciate you Jillian i would love if you could perhaps have a medical professional in with their reasons on not vaccinating? it is important to also have this, this would provide a complete understanding of this whole situation 💓✨
I have not heard one professional who actually stuck to facts of talking about not primary ( first three shots ) against COVID . Yes about4th shot and more boosters are not indicated in every body. If you know of any professional who was NOT stopping to lying when maligning vaccines , please do let me know. So far zero .
Jillian Michaels hope things are going well for you in your personal life you deserve the best for all you do in helping people such as myself to get fit and feel better about themselves so keep up the good work your a dream come true now I want to say thanks for putting out this informative video to help people understand more about the vaccine also I would like to say I am fully vaccinated and I got my third shot the booster shot but I hope people will decide to get vaccinated after seeing this informative video so with that being said peace ☮️ love ❤️ and happiness to you Jillian and your better half and your beautiful children and I’ll see you on the next Julian Michaels video
RE: how people used to handle epidemics, quarantines & lockdowns were used. Sometimes effectively, sometimes not (if a pathogen is carried by insects of found in water I guess it’s useless to lock people up, although I need to look into it). (I’m Russian so I know this) there was a cholera outbreak some time in the 19th century, lockdowns were used, travel restrictions and stuff like that. And eventually people in Moscow started attacking police and doctors because of those.
At TWiV 659 at min29 virologist Christian Drosten suggest that SARS COV2 better replicate at very low tissue temperature ? May be high mucouseal respiratory temperature protect against Covid19 ? But how can increase upper respiratory temperature,If body thermogenesis are weakened by different causes ? May be mask wearing not only stop droplets, but also can increase upper respiratory temperature. But also must avoid causes that can weaken thermogenesis
I,ve been a loyal follower of TEiV since start of pandemic. But. Now - Vincent needs to talk to Peter McCullough. Follow the US Expert Panel on Federal vaccine mandates and vaccine injuries. Yes, they reduce risk from serious illness, but they are not risk free. NOT completely safe.
TWiV followers recognise Vincent,s honesty but there is a peep at naïveté here….. we know now that Pfizer never released all it,s research data. The screening for adverse effects did not allow for the full story to be seen. Those who had a serious reaction did not go on to complete the study. They were not included in the data. Those ‘ risk reductions’ are relative risk reductions. I was taken in by this too. Listen to Peter Doshi. I used to be as trusting as Vincent back in my younger days….. Still agree with Vincent that boosters not necessary. Politics is playing big time here…. It,a tough for scientists who do good work to see this.
Vincent, just because you have not seen any serious ‘side effects’ that does not say they don,t happen. Have another looks at VARS. So glad his son was not one who developed anything terrible. There is a thousand fold higher risk from Covid when we,re old. That is not the case for children. I,ve been double vaxxed. But think UK JCVI made correct decision , albeit overuled on public health ( not individual ) grounds by MHRA. I am truly conflicted atm.
@@user-nx6ji9tk8i I have heard Doshi outright lie about statistics- very disappointing given his position. But he is not a medical doctor, not at all trained in immunology and has always been an antivaxxer.
I think we're past whether it "works" or not ... I'm sure it does. Vaxed and non Vaxed people are still coming together against MANDATES. That's the issue.
@@louisefarr235 there is anecdotal evidence and it has been used as an anti viral for decades. They’ve been using it on immigrants coming into this country that are sick. Won a Nobel prize. They spend millions on ridiculous studies. Including Fauci funding really cruel ones with dogs and animals in general. To put your whole hearted trust in the pharmaceutical company, or the government is not logical.
@@francesca3433 No there isn’t. There are a number of studies which have been pulled or discredited. I am happy with the safe and efficacious vaccine. You want to make grifters money by taking horse wormer, you do you.
That is OK because you will get infected at some point in the future. If you are lucky you won't get very sick and hopefully won't get any long-term disability as a result. After you are infected a couple of times you will become immune just like the other people who got the vaccine.
He says that Pfizer has full licence (FDA) but it doesn't. They got approval for another vax which is not in production. The shot in use is still the non-approved experimental and there is no change in sight.
His surname isYeadon and if people find his presentations (in a non-TH-cam vid site) then he talks for over an hour. He is retired and was VP and chief - scientist for Pfizer.
So you admit to being a newcomer to science and yet believe that you know enough to call someone far more qualified than you a "quack" without the science to support the accusation. 🙄
@@peteanderson7416 Perhaps she listened to more knowledgeable, more qualified, more honest scientists out there who advise NOT to take the vax, there are many of them.
@@theknowall2232 regardless that still doesn't give them the scientific knowledge to call someone a quack and a good number of these "more knowledge, honest" scientists that you refer to intersestingly provide zero peer reviewed, credible science to back up their claims. They seem to be providing "anti science" for those that failed science at school. When you say "more qualified, more knowledgeable" does that mean you actually check and compare the scientific credentials or simply that they say what you want to hear?
She made it plain from the outset that she wasn't seeking to influence or tell people what to do as circumstances vary. She was merely asking an expert some pertinent questions to gain a better understanding. She did that.
Vincent Racaniello has been one of my favourite’s to follow during this pandemic. Love his TH-cam channel. He does not get nearly as much attention as he deserves.
As a decade long This Week in Virology fan and someone wbo has watched every Columbia Virology lecture since 2015 i have to say Jillian you have seriously done the world a favor having Vincent on. Bravo
“small” side effects!? like which ones?
eschemic stroke?
necrosis at the injection site?
limb amputation?
kawasaki disease?
heart attack?
death?
which one was “small”?
This has brought me to tears. I haven’t heard anything this clear and informative this entire time of the pandemic!! The vaccine has been such a huge stress for me and my family because my husband and I have different view points. This brings me peace and hope… thank you both so much !!
Vincent is amazing! He has been the voice of reason for me!
I really appreciate this conversation because it answered a lot of questions but also created many more questions, and those are usually the most valuable types of podcasts/videos for me personally. I'll definitely be digging deeper into Mr. Racaniello's channel. If people were allowed to ask questions and get unbiased, data-driven answers rather than be called crazy conspiracy theorists, get bullied into a medical decision they're unsure about, etc. then the outcome would have possibly been different over the past several months.
I have been a fan of MicrobeTV and Vincent since 2015. Watched his course every year and every:
1. This week in Virology
2. This week in Evolution
3. This week in Parasitism
4. Immune
5. Q&A with A&V
Plus
MedCram Covid updates 1-100+
Howard Huges Medical updares
Dr. Mike Hansen
UCTV
Stanford
Etc etx
I can't imagine not having these resources!
@@RonnieD1970 Amazing! Thank you so much for all the resources you recommended. I really appreciate it!
@@kalichic007 hell ya! I forgot Brianne Barkers immuneology course. Its ongoing now.
This is from 9 months ago, and nothing @vincent said is wrong. Kudos. And thanks @jilllian
Thank you for having Dr. Racaniello on!
What happened to flu anyway? What’s the stats on flu now?
Flu wasn’t around last year because the main carriers, children, were not in school. I expect flu will be back this year.
One strand of flu has completely vanished due to hand washing and social distancing 🥳
My doctor is worried. It’s back this year and many people who usually get flu shots aren’t because they are focused only in Covid shots and scared to get both ( false info here again). I know many who are sick right now. And not with Covid
@@lyinvt only children spread flu? What? 🤦🏼♀️
@@alexandjuergen flu isn’t back. It never went away 🙄
Thank you so much!
Vincent is really good at what he does. Jillian, didn’t even know you had a channel. You need to advertise more
why is it so rare to hear (it was possibly even more rare when you posted this, than it is today) what you said in the intro."for the vaccinated, the unvaccinated, I respect your opinion".
This is the type of discussion I want to hear. A discussion based on logic, facts and not driven by ego (I like to hear you try to fight bias as much as possible)
I look forward to look at this, as I already watched mr.Racaniello on Lex Fridman's podcast, and he appeared as a respectful individual as well (I don't need to precize he also has a lot of knowledge to share).
So you got my like anyways.
Excellent podcast. Jillian, you are an excellent interviewer. Really great, thoughtful questions and then you let Prof Racaniello answer thoroughly without interruption. Vincent Racaniello is a clear voice and a superb communicator of the science we so desperately need.
glad you enjoyed!
A good basic discussion.
36:00 50% is the bare minimum to keep it on the market. that's one of the reasons the flu shot 'never' drop below. i think most hesitancy is the authoritarian push for sales; the history of these companies; the *highest level of profits in history* (not wartime 'all in this together'); & the virus doesnt harm you erally either, when it does that is also the immune system. gr8 interview. -JC
Thank you for this interview. You're a better interviewer than most journalists out there. You helped me and my sister decide to get vaccinated a few months ago because of your great interviews with experts. I got answers to my questions and was able to make an informed choice because of your podcast.
I just think its wrong to be manipulated in to getting it by governments, media etc. The way they handled this with blackmail is atrocious. Most important thing for people to know is that they have the right to choose.
A vast amount of evidence (on OTHER websites) points to the aims ...
i) vax passport,
ii) track and trace
iii) lower life expectancy.
There is zero evidence that suggests the vax is to benefit the health of the population.
What struck me about this video was the fact that Dr. Racaniello failed to mention something important: that the CDC stopped keeping track of breakthrough cases back in the Spring citing funding issues. Scott Gotlieb spoke about this on NPR in June. It is so important to share factual information when we're trying to clarify topics. We cannot leave out details...or else others (like me) don't really believe that the agenda is clear.
th-cam.com/video/lepqvdXoA2E/w-d-xo.html Senator Johnson Expert Panel on Federal vaccine mandates and vaccine injury. Covers the ‘failure’ to log adverse events. Many testimonies from the injured, including professionals and medics themselves with life changing adverse effects . No response from NIH, CDC, Pfizer, Moderna or others. Make up your own minds. Listen to former president of UK RCGPs right at the end ( 3:08: 30) She,s the same age as Vincent. Both been lifelong diligently practicing in their own fields. Yay, it,s even longer than TWiV. But the world has changed. Listen.
Breakthrough cases is a wrong phrase to use . Dr Rachaneillo is correctly against using such rubbish phrases that misheard people .
He is correctly critical of CDC using this misleading term . It mislead people into thinking vaccines were not effective . Protecting against infections is not a function of vaccine it’s to kept one from going to morgue and hospital . People previously infected also keep getting covid .
In fact to recent study shows that vaccine is more protective against reinfection than previous infection.
Why is it so rare to hear (it was possibly even more rare when you posted this, than it is today) what you said in the intro."for the vaccinated, the unvaccinated, I respect your opinion".
This is the type of discussion I want to hear. A discussion based on logic, facts and not driven by ego (I like to hear you try to fight bias as much as possible)
I look forward to look at this, as I already watched mr.Racaniello on Lex Fridman's podcast, and he appeared as a respectful individual as well (I don't need to precise he also has a lot of knowledge to share).
So you got my like anyways.
Thank you for the video !
I followed yo because i love vincent the virologist
Great information
From this point on, I hope people start their search for the truth in matters of biology with scientists (who aren’t paid to promote an agenda, like this esteemed guest) instead of putting their faith in politicians and biased media sources. Sad that it even needs to be said.
i appreciate you Jillian i would love if you could perhaps have a medical professional in with their reasons on not vaccinating? it is important to also have this, this would provide a complete understanding of this whole situation 💓✨
Ask Bruce Patterson, or hear him on Dr Been discussing Long Covid and insights
I have not heard one professional who actually stuck to facts of talking about not primary ( first three shots ) against COVID . Yes about4th shot and more boosters are not indicated in every body.
If you know of any professional who was NOT stopping to lying when maligning vaccines , please do let me know. So far zero .
@@user-nx6ji9tk8iBeen deceived a lot not as much as Campbell though
Jillian Michaels hope things are going well for you in your personal life you deserve the best for all you do in helping people such as myself to get fit and feel better about themselves so keep up the good work your a dream come true now I want to say thanks for putting out this informative video to help people understand more about the vaccine also I would like to say I am fully vaccinated and I got my third shot the booster shot but I hope people will decide to get vaccinated after seeing this informative video so with that being said peace ☮️ love ❤️ and happiness to you Jillian and your better half and your beautiful children and I’ll see you on the next Julian Michaels video
Great information!
Getting my booster next week. 💉 Thanks science 🙏🏼
Lol ok?
Awesome! I had the j&j (Janseen/ad.26) on March 2021 and am getting the pfizer as a "booster" as I am writing this lol. Just got jabbed lol
@@RonnieD1970 i made a tuna sandwich Thursday and as I'm speaking I'm making a PB&J. 🤡 🤡
@@maurice2014 put some WD 40 on on it
@@maurice2014 she's happy & you're pressed 🤡
He was great. And lovely too.
RE: how people used to handle epidemics, quarantines & lockdowns were used. Sometimes effectively, sometimes not (if a pathogen is carried by insects of found in water I guess it’s useless to lock people up, although I need to look into it). (I’m Russian so I know this) there was a cholera outbreak some time in the 19th century, lockdowns were used, travel restrictions and stuff like that. And eventually people in Moscow started attacking police and doctors because of those.
At TWiV 659 at min29 virologist Christian Drosten suggest that SARS COV2 better replicate at very low tissue temperature ?
May be high mucouseal respiratory temperature protect against Covid19 ?
But how can increase upper respiratory temperature,If body thermogenesis are weakened by different causes ?
May be mask wearing not only stop droplets, but also can increase upper respiratory temperature.
But also must avoid causes that can weaken thermogenesis
May be ,even vaccinated must avoid to decrease respiratory temperature
Low vitD afect muscular tonus.
Muscular tonus maintain normal thermogenesis.
One symptom of rickets is muscular hipotonia
Vinny, I wish to ask a personal favour will you please say the words the "kind that make you sick" like you used to back in the day?
"The KIIIIND that ...make...you....SICK"
This user makes troll comments on his videos.
aged like milk
Prof. Vincent Racaniello🙌
Jillian Michaels is gorgeous.
I,ve been a loyal follower of TEiV since start of pandemic. But. Now - Vincent needs to talk to Peter McCullough. Follow the US Expert Panel on Federal vaccine mandates and vaccine injuries. Yes, they reduce risk from serious illness, but they are not risk free. NOT completely safe.
TWiV followers recognise Vincent,s honesty but there is a peep at naïveté here….. we know now that Pfizer never released all it,s research data. The screening for adverse effects did not allow for the full story to be seen. Those who had a serious reaction did not go on to complete the study. They were not included in the data. Those ‘ risk reductions’ are relative risk reductions. I was taken in by this too. Listen to Peter Doshi. I used to be as trusting as Vincent back in my younger days….. Still agree with Vincent that boosters not necessary. Politics is playing big time here…. It,a tough for scientists who do good work to see this.
Vincent, just because you have not seen any serious ‘side effects’ that does not say they don,t happen. Have another looks at VARS. So glad his son was not one who developed anything terrible. There is a thousand fold higher risk from Covid when we,re old. That is not the case for children. I,ve been double vaxxed. But think UK JCVI made correct decision , albeit overuled on public health ( not individual ) grounds by MHRA. I am truly conflicted atm.
@@user-nx6ji9tk8i I have heard Doshi outright lie about statistics- very disappointing given his position. But he is not a medical doctor, not at all trained in immunology and has always been an antivaxxer.
@@mail4lana I thought he represented Pharmacists.
@@user-nx6ji9tk8i maybe he does! 😆 because the unvaccinated need LOTS more drugs.
I think we're past whether it "works" or not ... I'm sure it does. Vaxed and non Vaxed people are still coming together against MANDATES. That's the issue.
rapid fire. a lot covered for the time. -JC
The fact that he doesn’t address the antiviral, Ivermectin, is incredibly suspect, in my opinion.
Zero evidence that it works. Not one reputable study.
@@louisefarr235 there is anecdotal evidence and it has been used as an anti viral for decades. They’ve been using it on immigrants coming into this country that are sick. Won a Nobel prize. They spend millions on ridiculous studies. Including Fauci funding really cruel ones with dogs and animals in general. To put your whole hearted trust in the pharmaceutical company, or the government is not logical.
@@francesca3433 No there isn’t. There are a number of studies which have been pulled or discredited. I am happy with the safe and efficacious vaccine. You want to make grifters money by taking horse wormer, you do you.
@@louisefarr235 Not true at all. Look up "ivmmeta"
🤦♀️
Thank you for this information.
❤️ This show could be the start of something good…
Christopher G. Poeschl Stay Amazing…
COVID-19 Inspiration…❤️
Love ya’
The Florist…🌹
His body language and facial expressions was very telling. This wasn't an unbiased interview especially on his end.
I would venture to say that both weren't unbiased.
I don't pretend to be an armchair expert in body language or virology
I have been watching him for over decade. Please explain to me what and how was “Telling”.
Jilian you are always the best for me 💪🏻 good luck for you hi 👋🏻 from Algeria 🇩🇿
Amazing!!
please do a video about planning your workouts for begginersssss thank youuu
m.th-cam.com/users/results?sp=mAEA&search_query=jillian+michaels+workout+plan+beginner
This hasn’t convinced me to go get vaccinated
So why do you listen to this interview? It is fine if you have chosen not to be vaccinated for whatever reason
That is OK because you will get infected at some point in the future. If you are lucky you won't get very sick and hopefully won't get any long-term disability as a result. After you are infected a couple of times you will become immune just like the other people who got the vaccine.
OK. Then you’ll get the virus and maybe be hospitalized or worse. I’m OK with that.
Thank you 🙏🏻
Melatonin is a good prophylaxis and will also help the guilty sleep at night!..Hey Vinny, ask Lipkins mum, she prescribes!!
This didn’t age well
At time 37:40 this man tells a porky pie.
He says that Pfizer has full licence (FDA) but it doesn't. They got approval for another vax which is not in production. The shot in use is still the non-approved experimental and there is no change in sight.
Most people in employment are insecure enough with their jobs to omit the truth. One man who can speak without fear has the first name, Michael ...
His surname isYeadon and if people find his presentations (in a non-TH-cam vid site) then he talks for over an hour. He is retired and was VP and chief - scientist for Pfizer.
He strongly advises NOT to take it.
A BS artist and a virology professor, at a renowned university, disagree, and a fool thinks it is the genuine expert fibbing. Sad.
Im newcomer to science. Can someome tell me what TWIV stands for......The Wuhan Institute of Virology, have I got that right?
TWIV stands for "This Week In Virology."
So you admit to being a newcomer to science and yet believe that you know enough to call someone far more qualified than you a "quack" without the science to support the accusation. 🙄
@@peteanderson7416 Perhaps she listened to more knowledgeable, more qualified, more honest scientists out there who advise NOT to take the vax, there are many of them.
@@theknowall2232If they advised against vaccination, they weren't knowledgeable.
@@theknowall2232 regardless that still doesn't give them the scientific knowledge to call someone a quack and a good number of these "more knowledge, honest" scientists that you refer to intersestingly provide zero peer reviewed, credible science to back up their claims. They seem to be providing "anti science" for those that failed science at school. When you say "more qualified, more knowledgeable" does that mean you actually check and compare the scientific credentials or simply that they say what you want to hear?
Sooooo what, r u saying!? ?!
She made it plain from the outset that she wasn't seeking to influence or tell people what to do as circumstances vary.
She was merely asking an expert some pertinent questions to gain a better understanding.
She did that.
@@peteanderson7416 lol, i guess i should of stated ( i was talking to him!!!👍) geee thanks😁🙋.
Proffesor vincent...haha he is Tony Fuacis running dog! .......
🤮🤮🤮
Famous quote...who said "if you take then science out of politics, we will take the politics out of science..Ans Vinny the Quack.
Says "Scientific Fraud" who elsewhere admits being a "newcomer to science".
OMFG...not Vinny the quack!