Prof: Ayesha Jalal Or Prof. Ishtiaq Ahmed: Who’s Right?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.พ. 2025
- #AyeshaJalal #IshtiaqAhmed #Jinnah
Prof: Ayesha Jalal Or Prof. Ishtiaq Ahmed: Who’s Right? Recently Prof. Ayesha Jalal had argued that Nehru was responsible for the partition of India to pave way for his dynasty politics. In this video Prof. Dr. Ishtiaq Ahmed provides a detailed account of Jinnah’s speeches that led to the partition of India.
More Videos by Arvind Saharan
Sarhad Ke Us Paar: • Sarhad Ke Us Paar
The ViewPoint: • The Viewpoint
The Partition of India: • The Partition of India
Follow me on:
TH-cam: / arvindsaharan
Facebook: / arvindsaharanofficial
Twitter: / arvindsaharan3
Recently Prof. Ayesha Jalal had argued that Nehru was responsible for the partition of India to pave way for his dynasty politics.
In this video Prof. Dr. Ishtiaq Ahmed provides a detailed account of Jinnah’s speeches that led to the partition of India.
Sir i respect jinnah , he did a great job otherwise BHARAT MATA ka kya hota ,ishtiaq ahmed is a great scholar, hats off for him
Ayesha jalal said nehru ne partition kar waya
In interview with shehzad ghias sheikh
@@vineetsinghgusain701 That’s right. I am glad you saw that discussion.
Sir I watching you from past 3 years.. I want to join you.... volunteering services. I like you ideologies.
The entire subcontinent will one day recognize the effort and sincerity of Prof. Dr. Ishtiaq Ahmed .
The subcontinent continues to make demi gods of our leaders . If we are to progress and stop making the same mistakes again we have to accept the truth for what it is and that even our heroes can have many insecurities and faults.
Dr Ishtiaq you nailed it. I watched Ayesha Jalal, before watching your interview. Your ideas are more convincing and logical based on historical facts and authentic sources (literature). I am astonished Ayesha Jalal instead of answering the question says " Ishtiaq Ahmad is a political scientist", well, if you "Ayesha Jalal" are a historian, then give us some logical evidence in order to prove your arguments.
well, …avoid obfuscate, circumvent, muddle and try to wriggle out of the situation somehow, anyhow *or* refuse outright to engage in a moderated debate/discussion conducted by an unbiased & informed moderator
The objective evidence is that it was Nehru (not Jinnah) who rejected the last chance to keep India United in the form of the Cabinet mission Plan.
It was also Nehru who rejected the proposal for an independent and United Bengal (while Jinnah supported it).
@@wkhan5 He rejected because of the terms and conditions that came along with it.
Listen to this interview again till the end.
@@kunalyevankar1 Azad and the INC also accepted it. It was Nehru who rejected it after taking over. So you can wrap it in whatever way you want. It’s not going to change the reality that it was Nehru who broke up India
@@wkhan5 any source on that?
Read Rajagopalachri formula that Jinnah rejected, the final attempt to keep India United...
Without lies your argument dies. And Dr ishtiaq has killed all your false claims by now.
Jalal's history writing is mostly essays written in a way where opinions are stated as facts. Evidence is often a recycling of opinions.. She is not alone in this. It happens a lot with many historians of South Asia. Many of them are "eminent".
As a Pakistani I have always been comparing Jinnah and Imran Khan and after listening this interview Im convinced that both guys wanted to secure high chair for them at any cast .
Imran Khan is using same religious metaphors to gain power .
They never wanted to share power which is much distructive for a multi cultural country .
Jinnah, Bhutto and IK Niazi fall in the same category!
They were power hungry (perverted) psychopaths and narcissists who have fascist tendencies.
Pakistan never really was a multi cultural state when you've 98% people following one religion. Of course you have regional differences and distinct culture of that region, but the fundamental premise of Pakistan was that religion is the overiding factor over culture and hence Pakistan wasn't really multi cultural
Mindset of Muslims are two hundred percent different. Ishtiak Sahib you are hundred percent in favour of United Bharat but the converted Muslims were more dangerous than Arabian Muslims. The present muslims of Bharat are creating so many problems for Bharat. They are still in mind that they were rulers of Bharat. . My grandfather migrated from pakistan.But the ashraf Muslims are very much irresponsible for pasmanda Muslims.
Sir I'm a student of history in Rajasthan university Jaipur. sir today's lecture is really very very knowledgeable remarkable and memorable. you are a great researchers and teacher. thank you very much sir.
What a tragedy that a Pakistani muslim is revealing the honest truth.Our own Advani and Jaswant Singh belonging to BJP went out of their way to blame partition on Nehru and these two stalwarts of BJP even went on to declare that Jinnah was a great man who was vilified by Congress. Fortunately, Modi understood deviousness of these two gentlemen and properly sidelined them. Jaswant Singh eventually proved himself a snake by turning against BJP.
Jaswant is right as Nehru denied federation plan of 1945
Meetha meetha hap hap, karwa karwa thu thu. You're liking a Ishtiaq Ahmed's view because it sides with Congress' narrative of partition but discarding your own country's author because his views are not according to your wishes!
While I was listening to him, a song from Gangs of Wasseypur was playing as a background in my mind. That’s “Keh ke lunga”
Dr Sahab Is Such A Gem💎💎💎💎💎💎
M A Jinnah used religion to the highest extent to fulfill his political ambitions. He never practiced Islam. But his Pakistan didn't last for more than 24 years. Jinnah's two nation theory went into Bay of Bengal in 1971 when East Pakistan (till 1956 it was known as East Bengal) was born as Bangladesh.
My sincere thanks to Prof Ishtiaq Ahmed for his valuable discussion on history of the partition of India.
@@subratamallick9353 spot on
28:52 Jinnah had accepted Cabinet Mission Plan in principle but not entirely. In fact, Congress had also accepted the Cabinet Mission Plan with some reservations (like they were opposed to the condition of grouping of Muslim-majority provinces and right of Muslim provinces to secede from the Union). As per Cabinet Mission Plan, central government was to be weak and provinces were to enjoy more power. Jinnah preferred weak central government with no right to collect its own taxes with only Defence and Foreign Affairs falling under its jurisdiction and it being completely dependent on grants from provinces for funds because a weak centre meant easy secession of Muslim group of provinces. Congress wanted a strong central government that we now have in India where Centre is more powerful than provinces/states to curb secessionist forces.
Jinnah accepted Cabinet Mission Plan because he wanted the group of Muslim-majority provinces to secede away later. That ways he might have gotten whole of Punjab and Bengal (both provinces had only a slim Muslim majority. Congress’s counter-blackmail to Jinnah’s demand of partition was partitioning of Punjab and Bengal and retaining Muslim-minority parts of Punjab and Bengal with India whereas Jinnah wanted to have whole of Punjab and whole of Bengal in Pakistan. His plan was centred around maximising territory for Pakistan. Had he been successful then Pakistan would have encircled India’s capital territory (Delhi) on 3 sides! Gurgaon, Faridabad, Bahadurgarh, Rohtak, Sonepat would have been a part of West Pakistan as today’s Haryana was a part of Punjab Province in 1940s and Kolkata would have been a part of East Pakistan. Jinnah was so focussed on maximising territory for Pakistan that he offered the princely states of Jodhpur and Jaisalmer to join Pakistan at any terms (these two states were almost half of present day Rajasthan). Jinnah was very disenchanted with the Pakistan he got. He famously described it as “moth-eaten Pakistan”. Congress accepted Partition because Muslim League, even though it was a part of a national government (formed in July 1946) in partnership with Congress, was stoking the fire of communal riots all across India. When this fire of communal riots reached Punjab, the riots were extraordinarily bloody as Punjab had more than half a million of ex-soldiers demobilised after World War II. Many of these demobilised soldiers possessed firearms (guns, pistols, revolvers etc.) as well. Whether they possessed firearms or not, they surely were trained in the art of attacking in a systematic manner. That’s why the riots in Punjab were extraordinarily bloody and the casualty rate was very high (not to say riots were like ordinary riots in the other parts of undivided India, the riots were unprecedentedly bloody in Bengal, Bihar as well but in Punjab they were extraordinarily bloody so much so that those appeared like a Civil War). Sardar Patel felt that India was staring at a civil war. Because of high representation of Muslims in British Indian Army and police and presence of warring Pashtun tribes in NWFP whose support could have gone to Muslim side only, a civil war could have gone on for long which a war ravaged Indian economy could not afford. He understood that most of Muslims in undivided India supported Muslim League and Muslim League was unlikely to drop its demand for a separate homeland for Muslims anytime soon. Moreover, The Great Game and Cold War had also begun. Western powers were aligning to stop Communist Soviet bloc and Soviet bloc was looking at extending its influence to Indian subcontinent. So an India engaged in Civil War might have been a fertile ground for foreign intervention especially by P5 countries. Sardar Patel was proven right and we saw USA fighting USSR & China in Korean War of early 1950s, just 4 years after Indian independence.
Nehru & Gandhi, lost in their idealism, were not able to see through Jinnah’s nefarious plans. Had Sardar Patel not acted prudently on many occasions, territory of Republic of India would have been much smaller. Pakistan’s territory would have started just outside Delhi and Kolkata would have been capital of East Pakistan. We would have lost half of Rajasthan and half of Saurashtra (in the form of princely state of Junagadh) as well.
Excellent, concise assessment. Cuts through a lot of confusing stuff I have read on the subject. Thank you 🙂
@@torkeymada , thanks. I have edited it slightly. Please go through it again.
@@a.k.830 Thank you again 🙂
Great analysis
Very well articulated
love from lahore , PAKISTAN
24:45 That’s why Muslim forces of state of Hyderabad (numbered around 42,000 soldiers) along with 200,000 Razakars of MiM (today Owaisi family heads that party) crumbled before one corps of Indian Army (one corps=30,000 soldiers) in September 1948 (Refer to Operation Polo).
Anyway, this misconception still exists among Muslims of Pakistan and India. One Muslim (in both India and Pakistan) deems himself equal to ten Hindus.
When it is officially published in Pakistani army publications that 1muslim = 10 Hindus and when the society is fed the staple diet of such supremacy, what else do you expect?
Hats off to Professor Ishtiak Ahmed for his elaborate research and for the book he has published to show that it was Jinnah not Nehru who wanted partition of India
Aysha jalal is cerificat holder Historian😃😃😃
Dr Ishataq Ahmad is practically Historian no need him any certificate in History😊🌹🙏🇮🇳
So how we resolve Kashmir
@Ritesh Arora thanks for responding can you pass on the message please listen Pushpender kulshreshtha on you tube
COULD YOU PLEASE TELL ME WHY YOUR KAID E AZAM LEFT S ALMOST HALF OF MUSLIMS IN INDIA???? UNKO PAKISTAN MEIN JAGA KYUN NEHIN MILI??? WOH MUSALMAN NEHIN THE KYA??
Jinnah was probably right in demanding a homeland for Indian Muslims. Nehru was probably wrong in not requiring Muslims who wished for homeland go and settle in Pakistan. Nehru-Liaqat Ali agreement was not in the interest of India. Nehru was generous but Pakistan didn't reciprocate in kind. Indira was generous with Pakistan in 1972 and Pakistan didn't reciprocate. Now Pakistan is praising them being secular. If secularism is good why doesn't Pakistan adopt it, and doesn't want even people who claim themselves Muslims.
TOTAL POPULATION EXCHANGE NA HONA HI HAR PROBLEM KA JAR HAI: B R AMBEDKAR.
Then Why INDIAN MUSLIMS Did Not Leave HINDUSTAN after Partition, especially when they Protested for it??
Dear Dr Ishtiaq Ahmed, lots of love and respect, i watched the shehzad podcast, and i was also shocked by ayesha jalal, theories.
Dear sir, i think she was in an alternate universe where, Nehru was responsible for partition, and jinnah wanted united india.
I have lost all my respect for her as a historian.
Good job Arvind, hope I'll see you soon with Pushpinder ji! ❤️👏👍
Big salute to Prof. Ishtiaq Ahmed for all the research about Jinnah. And his guts to quote the facts.
Bahut Khoob Ishtiaq sir. Loved this session of yours. And Arvindji... good job.... in asking questions and being a good listener because Professor Sahab was on fire. And when a man is on fire... the best thing to do is let him continue !
Its quite obvious Ms. Jalal is proven wrong without an iota of doubt. We Indians should be lucky for our first PM who was a visionary who paved the strong foundation for progressive democratic India. If honest even Modi should be thankful for such strong foundation!
I haven't heard a better discussion in a very long time. Bravo! 👍
Dr. Ishtiaque has already invited her to a debate, let us wait and see if it happens
Vo nahi aayegi.
She will never come
Always love to hear Dr Ishtiaq Ahmed 💐💐
I'm from India. I respect Ishtiaq ahmed sir
Excellent question Asked by Dr. Ishtiaq Ahamadji.. Who. Is responsible for blood shade?? Thank you
Ayesha jalalji should Answer it.
Jinnah was hyper ambitious to get the highest chair, seeing it electorally impossible he invented an easier way to partition India
Nope.
He was playing British game .
For a Muslims Nation.
For Ummah
Prof. Ishtiaq Ahmed is one of the most intellectually honest researcher to come out of the Indian subcontinent.
I love to see ur program Arvind Bhai 🙏
Jinnah destroyed Muslims of the Indian continent by dividing the community into three country .: India , Pakistan and Bangladesh . Had partition not occurred , population of Muslims in the undivided India would have been 60 crores out of 160 crores . Such a strong concentration of Muslims in India would have been a strong , progressive forces . Secondly , an undivided India would have the chance to re establish itself as number one super power of the world . India has been numero uno for two thousand years . India could have achieved again number one position . Partition permanently dented its position of number one . Similarly , Muslims of Indian sub continent have little voice in international affairs . So, Jinnah committed the biggest damage to India and Muslim community .
Thank You Prof. Ishtiaq Ahmad.
We were a colony of East India Company. They had to create disturbance in some form of the other while leaving. If not partition then maybe some other disturbance. But the intellectuals at that point of time fell prey to partition...
Cambridge University should withdraw the PhD degree from Ayesha Jalal as she could not prove her hypothesis that Jinnah was a secularist, he was not interested in the Partition and the Congress party forced him to have the partition.
This was the most informative talk of partition of india.
Thanks u to Arvind & prof.
Good Work Arvind bhai💐
Excellent discussion. Whoever is right, it is always great hear to intellectuals !
Good work arvind saharan
istiaq ahmed sir very true historial men
I am big fen istiaq ahmed sir
from ahmedabad Gujarat india🇮🇳 se
Thanks Arvind Sir for a knowledgeable discussion🙏🇮🇳🙏
What a insight with evidences and clear cut explanation about what happened. Kudos to Dr Ahmed.
Ayesha Jalal is trying to build castles in the air.
Wow. I am very Impressed with Ishtiaq Ahmed vast knowledge on these topics.
Multiple factors for partition
1. Jinnah felt insecure as the Congress grew in numbers . And Gandhi became a dominant figure.
Britishers had any way wanted to divide and encouraged Muslim League. They did not have a leader.
Jinnah was planted as their leader without grass root support
Pakistan was created to satisfy Jinnha’s ego. It was not a true Nation and you can see from present state
A lot of knowledge and information got by these discussion, thanks to Arvind sir and Namaste prof. Ishtiaq Ahmed.
The traitors who partitioned there motherland will never be able to live peacefully and will be further partitioned into many pieces.
Good to hear that... I also believe that many more Pakistan will emerge in India soon🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@fahadashaikh5120 yes. You are right. Your qualification please?
@@karndeosingh9689 Enough to see the partition of India soon into 20 pieces 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@fahadashaikh5120 keep dreaming.
@ Same was your ancestors Saying in 1947🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣👍
Excellent, very knowledgeable discussion
Doctor sahab ne jo last interview mein kha hai Shia sunni and muslim league congress on the last part of interview was amazing. Most of us just can't say this.
Love you both for unbiased and great Discussion.
Prof Ishtiaq Ahmed ko salute!
Excellent episode. Thank you arvindji for bringing in dr. Ishtiaq Ahmedji.
I am just sad that not many Pakistanis watch your channel or Arzoo Kazmi channel. Please try to get more Pakistani viewership.
Bhai sahab pakistan me internet itna sasta nahi hai ki wo TH-cam dekh sake 🙏
@@anand9728 correct✅✔✅✔
@Viinay9 Absolutely correct✅✅
BRO I AM PAKISTANI AND I EVER WATCHED ARVIND SIR
M Pakistan se hoon , aur Arvind Bhai k shows dkhta rhta hoon... 🇵🇰
Unbiased objective truly intellectual. I’m so impressed by Dr. Saab. Proud of being Punjabi when I listen to Dr.
Brilliant, discussion. Informative..
Very informative. Ironically many Indians put the blame of partition on Gandhi and Nehru.
partition was made by uk and usa ;jinnah.gandhi and nehro were their puppets.
Another great video Arvind. Dr Saab is very eloquent, I wish your voice reaches more and more people to the west of Radcliffe line.
Excellent discussion....very much revealing the truth of partition.. thank u very much...
Thanks for very knowledgeable history of real partition of Our India salute to Pakistan Historion
The real human being. Salute sir for telling the truth!
Excellent programme
Excellent n very useful debate
Dr istiyaq sir at least speaks the truth based on facts. We always listen to you and have belief as a good character we face. Thanks
अरविंद जी आप बहुत अच्छे विद्वान है ।आपको भारत मे रहना चाहिये।आप चाहे तो सिविल सर्विस की तैयारी करने वाले प्रतिभागियों को पढ़ा सकते है ।बहुत भला होगा छात्रों का ।ऐसा मेरा मानना है
Neutral books on partition. Freedom at midnight, The Great Divide, Divide and Quit, Mission with Mountbatten. I, have personal copies of all these.
Thanks Arvind for presenting such a good program
Dr. Mubarik and Tariq Ali's books acknowledged Dr. Ishtiaq's statements not Aisha Jalal.
ishtiaq sir has been a very influential to the readers in india who are getting to read alot about pakistan
Dr. Ishtiaq Ahmed, you are a gentleman 🙏
Great analysis sir
Love you ☺️🙏
Bhai Video 10 Minute Pehle Hi Daala Hai, Aap Ne Ek Min Mein Video Dekh Kar Apna Opinion Kaise De Diya? Pehle Dekh To Lein. 🙏🙏
@@ArvindSaharan 😂😂
@@ArvindSaharan 😥😥
😂😂
@@ArvindSaharan haha. unko sirf ye batana tha. that he love you. hahah
Truthful and vivid explanation about 1947 partition by this brave learned prof ishtiyaq Ahmed.
Arvin’d your are very good listener and asking right question to your guest .
Sir, you are still the professor. And I still thank you for your involvement in my own development. God bless you sir . Stay safe
Highly informative video from a knowledgeable person who put forward the truth of partition due to Jinnah
Very knowledgeable sir.. 🙏🏼🙏🏼
The same arabic ideology which partitioned Serbia and created kosovo , is also responsible for India's partition .
Forget the past let’s move on
@@shashikantrajani6794 ARE YOU MAD OR SOMETHING ELSE 🤔
Very informative!
21:05 to 21:45 , Despite such statements from Jinnah about Muslims in those provinces where they were in minority...most of such Muslims voted for Muslim League voted for Muslim League in 1945 General Election to Central Assembly (this Central Assembly later became Constituent Assembly which drafted our constitution and later Parliament of India) and 1946 elections to provincial assemblies. Despite such statements, Muslim League won 100% of all seats reserved for Muslims in Central Assembly in 1945 election and 87% of seats reserved for Muslims in all Provincial Assemblies in 1946 election. What does this mean? It means that Muslims in Muslim-minority provinces like U.P., Bihar, Madras, Bombay etc. were more loyal to the idea of Pakistan rather than Muslims of Muslim-majority provinces like Sindh, Punjab etc. It should not be forgotten ever that the b@stard Jinnah was elected from Bombay, not Karachi or Lahore. It was Muslims of Bombay city who elected Jinnah. No wonder that majority of Muslims of India celebrate victory of Pakistan over India in cricket.
Great job. You put two experts at this discussion. Ms Jalal is like many other so called experts of Pakistan who talk according to the directions given by Pakistani establishment without any backbone. Dr Ahmad is knowledgeable and tells truth without any fear.
Dr. Saheb you have done a great thing. Whatever has been told by you regarding the speeches, press conferences etc. Undoubtedly Jinna does not justify the glory as is being given to him by the same set of people.
some shows should be conducted about all history about partition by such honest intellectuals , i think this is the need of hour coz history about partition twisted by many historians , so many confusion about some personalities like bhagat singh , gandhiji, nehru , jinnah ,netaji youth wants to know about true history 🙏baki acha h lge rho bhaisahab ram ram from haryana
Dr.Sahab has given all evidences with Jinnah's speeches in exact verbatim.gr8
Most logical and well researched writer on Partition!!
Nice work Arvind bhai
Dr Saheb I love Indian history hence enjoy listening to all your interview. Please give the name of all your books and from where I can order them.
Arvind sir ap ka ab tak Ka sabse shandar episode. thanks bhai.
Wahh sir Very very intelligent and knowledge full lecture.you are icon of students.
In the light of the consistent and comprehensive arguments of Ishtiyaq Saheb, it’s amply clear that Jinnah was solely responsible for the partition. Ayesha Jalal simply beat about the bush when she said that Congress was responsible for partition.
JINNAH'S PARTING MESSAGE ; April 25, 1935 ,
HINDU GOVT. OR INDIAN GOVT .? "Muslims", he said ," were in a very difficult position. The policy of Hindu Mahasabha was dominated by considerations of complete Hindu supremacy in the future. The Muslims could not be expected to work hand in hand with them . Even in the Congress, there was a section which was dissatisfied with Muslim patriotism, although in all important divisions in Assembly the Muslims had supported popular opinion . Let us hope Congress leaders with their greater experience and political training can overcome that section and assure us in future that it would not be a Hindu Government but an Indian Government in which the Muslims would have their equal rights" .
After the 1937 elections under the Govt of India Act 1935 where ever Congress won they did not invite the ML to join the Govt. and Nehru also issued a public statement that they will pass all laws with a simple majority and not a two-third majority . Mr Jinnah being a highly reputed Barrister and intelligent political leader knew the meaning and effect of such a statement on minority Muslims!
Well-meaning Mr Jinnah also offered all the rights to the Sikhs also but their leader was a Hindu Nank Chand Malhotra urf Tara Singh , who was planted and promoted by the founder of Hindu Mahasabha Pandit MM Malviya , refused the offers ! He went to the extent of hacking down the Muslim League flag on March 3,1947 at Lahore with his KIRPAN and shouted PAKISTAN MURDABAD with support of Hindu Mahasabha, Congress, and Akali leaders and MLAs !
That rascal went to the extent of planning to KILL JINNAH and innocent Muslims . Read the TOP SECRET report of Lord Mountbatten of August 9,1947 given on page 172 of book MOUNTBATTEN AND THE PARTITION OF INDIA ! I have posted it on TH-cam also , any one can read it !
How absurd! Pàkístàn has a history of just 70 years, prior history totally denied and eradicated. On top of that thos country lies about the history of it's creation just 70 years back! How is this even acceptable on a national scale? How are they hoping to survive without a grasp on their origins?
I don't know how, there should be deliberate and special efforts to make his new book easily available in India, Pakistan & Bangladesh at affordable prices. People of the subcontinent have a right to know their true history. Besides low Kindle Version price, some philanthropists/organizations can think of gifting the book liberally to libraries in educational institutions.
I would suggest to the host to invite Ayesha Jalal to listen her as well and understand her point of view.
Got your point she won't come
No doubt Jinnah was an Embassador of Hindu Muslim unity and didn’t want division if the India to begin with.
Why his thinking changed ?
Why the demand for the separate homeland evolved.?
What circumstances and attitudes of the congress leadership forced to change his ideas ?
What about book Jaswant Singh about Jinnah?
Waaaah kya baat gao....good to see him back ...
Rest of indians accepted pakistan but we punjabi hindus and Sikhs(Nationalist) will never accept it
Those who were ashamed on thier Language culture history and heritage has taken pakistan in name of Religion
And Those who were proud on thier language culture history and heritage were thrown out from thier own land. Congress was british agent we dont accept its partition. Punjab and Sindh are our land and we will fight an ideological war to claim that. I am facing backlash from my own Hindu friends (Non hindu Nationalist) but I am Sure My Hindu Nationalist Friends gonna support me and understands me
Respect to Prof. Ahmed from India.
namaste Dr Ishtiaq Ahmed sir 🙏
No one can be compared with Istiaq Sahab. He is extraordinary n he is unbiased n impartial that no one will believe, he is a Pakistani.
Dr Ishtiaq Ahmed ji hum INDIANS aap ke Shuker guzaar hai ki aap history kou kareeb se jante hain ji 🙏❤🇮🇳
Padho toh tum bhi jaan sakte ho
@@vineetsinghgusain701 shayad aap ne 1947 ki partition ki history per PHD ki hai & Dr Ishtiaq Ahmed se jayada books kou publish karva diya hai Bhai, kya main theek souch raha houn?
@@nageshsharma9366 ji bilkul...
@@vineetsinghgusain701 Then you r also welcome along wd Dr Ishtiaq,
@@nageshsharma9366 okk
Àn educative presentation by a learned scholar.
Great word by dr ishtiaq from pakistan
Dr Sahib is a person I trust blindly 🙏🙏
Blindly you just follow hindu way...don't do that...listen understand and analyze
Kudos to Ishtiaq Saab! I am buying his book ASAP!
Ishtiaq Ahmed sir thanks for true history salaam namaskar
Ishtiaq Saab , why is your book not available on kindle?
Nice to hear from my Pakistani friends that Nehru was communal.Show me one speech where he says that India was just for Hindus