the comment before this seems to be someone who could not understand and follow the threads of the lecturer's arguments. Also this lecture seems to be a very basic treatment of the subject matter - undergrad or post grad level. I enjoyed it.
Thank you Professor Pauley check out the other videos or just go learn somewhere else. He's a Professor @ NYU, he may know more about what he's talking about then you do.
Thank you for this lovely video,. it got my curious about my origins so I looked some online and took the My Bronze Age Origins test (Gene Plaza). I found out that I was 14% ancient Hebrew, the people of the Bible! I never knew I was Israelite, but I guess I should have known because I was always curious about the bible stories and always felt part of the people of the bible. Now I have proof. I have also 22% Chongoni Rock art , which fits with my ancestry because I am a quarter black. Just a warning, don’t get the beginner test, it’s cheaper but it doesn’t have the ancient people of the Bible.
Your discovery is fascinating in regards to you being 14% Hebrew, however keep in mind that a Hebrew is any descendent that came directly from the seed of Abraham. But this does not qualify every Hebrew as an Israelite. An example of this is Abraham son Ishmael who was also a Hebrew but not an Israelite and therefore he did not inherent the promise. Remember Abraham son Jacob later God called him Israel and the promise was given to his 12 sons which are the 12 tribes of Israel. This is not emotional but biblical and historical facts.
@@anthonyt2745 Exactly. Arabs, Israelites and Canaanties are all genetically the same ... biblical stories aside. That's what DNA testing is showing ever-more.
Daniel 10:6 his body also was like the beryl, and his face as the appearance of lightning, and his eyes as lamps of fire, and his ARMS and his FEET like in COLOUR to POLISHED (burnished) BRASS (brown), and the voice of his words like the voice of a multitude.
Call it whatever you want - a country or an empire. It was nation with political leaders, law, army etc. Actually archaeology proofs the existence of King David and King Solomon. Check it up on the internet. Land of Ancient Israel wasn't always occupied by the empires you have mentioned. It was a sovereign "entity" for a long time.
What time frame are you talking about? You are saying that there was no ancient Israel. Who was Saul, David and Salomon then? Shepherds that were made kings by literary-ideological construction? Because I always thought that they were kings of Israel, which would actually imply that there was an ancient country probably called Israel...
Search utube: Samaritans in Nablus of west Bank. Samirah and judea belong to ancestry of Palestinians. Samaritans inhabited canaan land from about 1600 B.C. Most nowadays jews are Ashkenazi of khazars origin. Search utube Khazars conversion to judaism, Ashkenazi jews DNA.
Not only that: but the patriarchs are seen as in some way reflecting a "background" to Israel's origins from the outside. But archaeology shows that what defines Palestine for thousands of years prior to the appearance of "Israel" is absolute continuity WITHIN. Crises and their resolutions over centuries were always internal. There's no room for hypotheses about nomadic invasions to explain changing cultural horizons.
Maybe the United States should give the land back to the natives and Canada also . How many Western European countries occupy some other people’s land? What about the Saxon invasion of England ? Should France give back the land before the Saxon invasion and don’t forget the ango invasion of a place that we call England. It’s called the divine right of congress unless you want to be fair and give back Ssudi Arabia and TransJorden too .
Curious;When was the area we know as Palestine a free independent country? I far as I have been able to find out there never was a nation Palestine.The area was up until 1948 was in the hands of the Britons, before that they were.a holding of the Ottoman Empire and finally the Hapsburg.
This series of videos would benefit greatly from proper archaeological study which explains the fertile crescent etc. I am deeply disappointed in the series after sitting through several lectures. The breadth of the lecturer's knowledge is sadly, insufficient.
I agree. I imagine this NYU course was difficult for students to get through. It only takes a couple of lectures such as this for the student to become confused or disheartened or disinterested in the course. The visuals are poor and the delivery of this prof lacks motivation. Is this the type of lecture NYU students normally receive?
Proverbs 3:5-6 5 Trust in the Lord with all thine heart; And lean not unto thine own understanding. 6 In all thy ways acknowledge him, And he shall direct thy paths.
I have checked out the other videos, and my point remains the same. There was no such thing as ancient Israel. It is a literary-ideological construction.
Isaiah 29:22 Therefore thus saith the Lord, who redeemed Abraham, concerning the house of Jacob, Jacob shall not now be ashamed, NEITHER shall HIS FACE now wax PALE (to be white).
Colossians 2:8 8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
Revelation 2:18 And unto the angel of the church in Thyatira write; These things saith the Son of God, who hath his eyes like unto a flame of fire, and his FEET are like FINE BRASS;
The stories of the patriarchs in Genesis tell us about the origins of Ancient Israel? What an absurd hypothesis, backed up by the fact that the lecture says absolutely nothing about the origins of Ancient Israel.
Revelation 2:9 I know thy works, and TRIBULATION, and POVERTY, (but thou art rich) and I KNOW the BLASPHEMY of THEM which SAY THEY are JEWS, and NOT, BUT ARE the SYNAGOGUE of SATAN.
the comment before this seems to be someone who could not understand and follow the threads of the lecturer's arguments. Also this lecture seems to be a very basic treatment of the subject matter - undergrad or post grad level. I enjoyed it.
I am loving these lectures.Do have any other video series
Luke 21:15
15 For I will give you a mouth and wisdom, which all your adversaries shall not be able to gainsay nor resist.
Great lecture, thank you
Thank you Professor Pauley check out the other videos or just go learn somewhere else. He's a Professor @ NYU, he may know more about what he's talking about then you do.
Theological discussions aside, I have a problem with the fact we're 3 classes into this course and homeboy still doesn't have a dry erase marker?
Thank you for this lovely video,. it got my curious about my origins so I looked some online and took the My Bronze Age Origins test (Gene Plaza). I found out that I was 14% ancient Hebrew, the people of the Bible! I never knew I was Israelite, but I guess I should have known because I was always curious about the bible stories and always felt part of the people of the bible. Now I have proof. I have also 22% Chongoni Rock art , which fits with my ancestry because I am a quarter black. Just a warning, don’t get the beginner test, it’s cheaper but it doesn’t have the ancient people of the Bible.
Your discovery is fascinating in regards to you being 14% Hebrew, however keep in mind that a Hebrew is any descendent that came directly from the seed of Abraham. But this does not qualify every Hebrew as an Israelite. An example of this is Abraham son Ishmael who was also a Hebrew but not an Israelite and therefore he did not inherent the promise. Remember Abraham son Jacob later God called him Israel and the promise was given to his 12 sons which are the 12 tribes of Israel. This is not emotional but biblical and historical facts.
@@anthonyt2745 Exactly. Arabs, Israelites and Canaanties are all genetically the same ... biblical stories aside. That's what DNA testing is showing ever-more.
not an isrelite, you're a gentile. You're an infidel, you'll never see the kingdom of Israel
Daniel 10:6 his body also was like the beryl, and his face as the appearance of lightning, and his eyes as lamps of fire, and his ARMS and his FEET like in COLOUR to POLISHED (burnished) BRASS (brown), and the voice of his words like the voice of a multitude.
Asherah said stop this garbage.
Amen
Call it whatever you want - a country or an empire. It was nation with political leaders, law, army etc. Actually archaeology proofs the existence of King David and King Solomon. Check it up on the internet. Land of Ancient Israel wasn't always occupied by the empires you have mentioned. It was a sovereign "entity" for a long time.
What time frame are you talking about? You are saying that there was no ancient Israel. Who was Saul, David and Salomon then? Shepherds that were made kings by literary-ideological construction? Because I always thought that they were kings of Israel, which would actually imply that there was an ancient country probably called Israel...
Search utube: Samaritans in Nablus of west Bank.
Samirah and judea belong to ancestry of Palestinians.
Samaritans inhabited canaan land from about 1600 B.C.
Most nowadays jews are Ashkenazi of khazars origin.
Search utube Khazars conversion to judaism, Ashkenazi jews DNA.
Not true. The khazar theory has been disproved and samaritan's only immigrated to Canaan in the 5th century bce
Titus 1:14 not giving heed to JEWISH FABLES (falsehood), and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.
Asherah said stop this garbage.
Wow! Fables are falsehoods? I would never have known without.your input. Nitwit.
@Nilda Verzosa thanks for the patriarch time line can you give us the time line from king saul. Kaam77u7@aol.com
Correction kaam7777@aol.com
Not only that: but the patriarchs are seen as in some way reflecting a "background" to Israel's origins from the outside. But archaeology shows that what defines Palestine for thousands of years prior to the appearance of "Israel" is absolute continuity WITHIN. Crises and their resolutions over centuries were always internal. There's no room for hypotheses about nomadic invasions to explain changing cultural horizons.
Maybe the United States should give the land back to the natives and Canada also . How many Western European countries occupy some other people’s land? What about the Saxon invasion of England ? Should France give back the land before the Saxon invasion and don’t forget the ango invasion of a place that we call England. It’s called the divine right of congress unless you want to be fair and give back Ssudi Arabia and TransJorden too .
Conquer
Curious;When was the area we know as Palestine a free independent country? I far as I have been able to find out there never was a nation Palestine.The area was up until 1948 was in the hands of the Britons, before that they were.a holding of the Ottoman Empire and finally the Hapsburg.
This series of videos would benefit greatly from proper archaeological study which explains the fertile crescent etc. I am deeply disappointed in the series after sitting through several lectures. The breadth of the lecturer's knowledge is sadly, insufficient.
I agree. I imagine this NYU course was difficult for students to get through. It only takes a couple of lectures such as this for the student to become confused or disheartened or disinterested in the course. The visuals are poor and the delivery of this prof lacks motivation. Is this the type of lecture NYU students normally receive?
Please take a look at how long ago this was recorded, tech and recording has greatly improved. Per professor, this was an impromptu taping.
Proverbs 3:5-6
5 Trust in the Lord with all thine heart;
And lean not unto thine own understanding.
6 In all thy ways acknowledge him,
And he shall direct thy paths.
2 John 10
10 If anyone comes to you and does not bring this doctrine, do not receive him into your house nor greet him;
I will teach yall
This is history, not science. But why is it an absurd hypothesis?
I have checked out the other videos, and my point remains the same. There was no such thing as ancient Israel. It is a literary-ideological construction.
This lecture is outrageously bad. There is almost no content here. If you were taking notes, they would fill less than a page.
shawty's popular
Isaiah 29:22 Therefore thus saith the Lord, who redeemed Abraham, concerning the house of Jacob, Jacob shall not now be ashamed, NEITHER shall HIS FACE now wax PALE (to be white).
Asherah said stop this garbage.
What the he'll is he talking about
Colossians 2:8
8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
There was no Saudi Arabia in the ancient world it was called "Cush" thats right Cush. There was no Syria either it was the land of the Hittites.
Wow, you are confused! Ancient Cush was Ethiopia, in Africa. The land of the Hittites was in Anatolia, modern day Turkey.
@@ericspencer8093 axum is ethopia, kush is sudan en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Kush
rambling on and on about what he's going to teach. Bad lecture hard to watch this piir students paid for this.
Well, it's his opinion, but it's not very scientific.
Revelation 2:18 And unto the angel of the church in Thyatira write; These things saith the Son of God, who hath his eyes like unto a flame of fire, and his FEET are like FINE BRASS;
Asherah said stop this garbage.
The stories of the patriarchs in Genesis tell us about the origins of Ancient Israel? What an absurd hypothesis, backed up by the fact that the lecture says absolutely nothing about the origins of Ancient Israel.
Talks a lot, says nothing. Boring as hell.
Boring
I'll go on TH-cam if I like. And for your information, I have a first class honours degree in biblical history.
Ya this guy is very hard to watch.
this is the first of like 15 or so different MOOCs i've tried that's halfway interesting
Revelation 2:9 I know thy works, and TRIBULATION, and POVERTY, (but thou art rich) and I KNOW the BLASPHEMY of THEM which SAY THEY are JEWS, and NOT, BUT ARE the SYNAGOGUE of SATAN.
What are you doing on TH-cam then, when clearly your time traveling ability could be better used elsewhere.
By the way, there was no such thing as ancient Israel. It is a literary-ideological construction.