this series of videos and explanations in nearly layman terms to the public, might be the single best approach for education in the world--insightful, fast moving, just enough technicals to prompt further research and still entertaining. I appreciate you RLK!
@@johncarter1150 Not. Wong. Science sentence is true proposition. " information" hasnt true proposition instead only baseless words. See Russell books atomism philosophy . Feynman books. J C maxwell Works. Hawkins books. Model match is essencial in Science while axiom is principles.
The backgrounds in your videos are really good keep doing that. Add variety like interiors with strong colors, like what you see on a movie set. Keep it up
The most interesting and fascinating type of information that is known to us so far is the complex functionally specified information (CFSI) which is prescriptive and purposeful. That kind of information is produced by mind. The regulatory genomics/epigenomics and the bio-electric morphogenetic code are examples of that kind of information. Biology research is moving ahead making exciting discoveries, while Physics struggles with the standard models of cosmology and particle physics, inflation, string theory, multiverse, loop quantum gravity, and all that stuff and Neuroscience struggles with the hard problem of consciousness.
Like in data science it's like impossible for an AI to know where to look. But I can come up with it easily for eg: This population subset likes music, wonder how much of the lyrics is morose vs jolly, how were the moods of the time when the music came out, maybe we should look at what they were eating or not eating. The way our minds can wander like that to clean up datasets is very strange. I think an AI can come to these questions but would require a lot of brute force processing.
The universe is a 2D information based hologram encoded in 3D. Space/Time is an illusion. Everything you experience is an illusion. Information is never lost. It cannot be lost or destroyed.
NTS 90/u/g There is this way Chiara Marletto approaches information in her physicis of counterfactuals book which matches most of what Aguirre assigns as properties and information relations but say in his example of the information in the black hole it can also be understood as different configurations of the system and it’s micro states, the so called loose of information is just a property of the new system state, when some set of information merges into superposition which seems like information is lost when it’s just rearranged and some other set of states collapses from the wave function or interacts and therefore changes the state again in such a way once unitary state becomes multiple different other system state configuration, resulting in different “qualities” of entropy
Which we can easily (as easy as it can be done at home) experimentally test with photons, splitting and measuring V and H polarization of a laser with cheap lens and mirrors, as well as merging it again (maybe less cheaply) meaning one micro state can be seen as two different configurations, two equal configurations can be seem as just one (unitary) and two different configurations can be seem again as just one configuration but a different sort of unitary as it contains the two possible properties of that photon now; a simple arrangement of qbits with states being one among H, V or both HV, or in quantum computing, true, false or both T&F which is systematically split (therefore information seem lost, and can actually be accounted as lost under a strict information theory view, but becomes just rearranged) in example by the Peter Shor’s algorithm
Information is the way that physicists try to grapple with reality according their paradigm of quantification - this doesn’t mean that reality is in its essence information
Not only is reality not composed of information, but information itself is not really a thing. It is a very useful mental construct which does not exist in nature.
@@caricue I would be careful of using the phrase mental contracts because all words and terminology are mental constructs that point to a real thing. While information may be a mental construct it points to a real thing. For example if you want an apple you are not going how are you going to tell someone what you want without using information to describe it. Without information communication would be impossible.
The paradigm of information being physical started when John Von Neumann came up with an abstract machine that could create blue prints and anything that is possible known as a quantum cellular automata. This abstract machine had an infinite array with an indefinite number of network nodes that were the atoms of space. Upon studying the QCA they found parallels to the Cosmos. A Quantum Cellular Automata is reversible, symmetric, isotropic and homogeneous just like the Cosmos. It is also time-symmetric meaning the rules works both forward and backward in time which sounds a lot like the laws of physics. Around 1970 physics started to model the Cosmos as a giant Quantum Cellular Automata to study fundamental physics and come up with new theories.
@@kos-mos1127 So many people seem to be confused on this point, and many of them call themselves scientists. Nature does not do information. DNA is not an information carrier and information processing computers are mechanisms that don't know anything, especially about information. Sloppy language leads to sloppy thinking.
@@caricue Science has been using analogies to explain physical concepts. The worst analogy is comparing the human brain with a computer. Also comparing the Cosmos to mechanical clock was horrible as well.
Is Bolzman entropy related to the volume of the information? How would Bolzman entropy relation to volume factor in to black hole information based on surface area, not volume?
Inside black hole, could information become quantum? With Hawking radiation based on quantum mechanics, might not information leave black hole along with thermal radiation? Matter information could be reduced to energy as quantum waves in black hole?
It's like going blindfolded and muted in a football match and expected to score a goal... so if you want to increase your chance of scoring you most likely will need access to some environmental information...
I find this hard to understand because I don't understand unitarity in quantum mechanics. I think that's key to understanding the issue with Hawking radiation. Every video I've seen on the problem just glides over it, never explaining why unitarity is so fundamental to quantum physics!
@@gyozakeynsianism This is only my own bizarre understanding, but the quantum nature is to strive for unity or symmetry with "spin" trying to shape a perfect object and while not doing so, creates a "field". It does this in the EM which dissipates, and info is the leftover (or the wall) between the creation and dissipation. The sun approaches closely this perfect object and so does the black hole, and they balance each other by expanding and contracting time space field, so necessarily there's leakage. The information is just along for the ride. Another way to see it might be as the Higg's Bosun field as an above ground swimming pool with a wall that the kids running around the outside of the pool wall can't climb. The kids and the space they run in are the EM. Look at the shapes, the pool is an object and the EM is a torus, topologically speaking. Look at the movements, the pool with only the movement of dilation, while the kids can run rings or dart back and forth. Does the pool expand and contract, leaving a ring which dissipates further, into Planck lengths of motion, repeated as chemistry? The ring seems like the information, which is desirable and the impulse to join that and the source beyond is the Will to Power.
Well, seems to define information as the state of something that only exist but I see information to be present even in an empty space. Well, if you know that space is empty you have already defined information as zero so you have information at time t0, now evolution of information from time t0 to time T1 is just aggregation of space either empty or not.
I also have this question. I suspect our confusion comes from not understanding the concept of unitarity in quantum mechanics. I hope someone can explain it here!
@@kos-mos1127 OK, I get that the area under probability distributions must sum to 1. And I can see how this might be applied to quantum mechanics in the probability distribution of a wave function. But how does this create a paradox in black hole information loss?
@@gyozakeynsianism In Quantum Field Theory information is conserved because the filed contains all the information about the state of a system. In black holes information is loss meaning the system collapses into a single state which also violates the uncertainty principle.
I wonder if the totality is absolute information, and disorder/entropy is a feature of relative data. If a ‘God’s Eye view’ were to exist, maybe ‘noise’ could only exist from a finite perspective, and chaos is really a myopic illusion.
That's exactly what it is. And surprisingly, most people don't understand that. You are one of the few people I've seen that gets it! Like you said, Chaos is observer dependent...an illusion. If you had a double pendulum system and put it in front of two observers : one of them a scientist, the other a super computer...the scientist would observe chaos in the movement of the double pendulum...because that scientist is not able to track all the states in that system. The supercomputer by contrast has no issue making predictions about this double pendulum system because it can analyze all the states in that system. Therefor Chaos is an observer dependent phenomenon, meaning that Entropy (the measurement of randomness in a system) and the deduction of information from a system (Reducing predictable patterns from a system of random information), is based on the observer and their own level of computational capacity. That's another thing about Entropy...is it's connection between randomness, and patterns. Randomness is in principle something that can not be predicted because there is no patterns to simplify that system. Whereas in a system that exhibits a pattern, you can reduce that behavior into an equation, and make predictions about that system. Because of the illusion of Chaos here...it means that this relationship is observer dependent...meaning patterns and randomness are based relative to who is doing the computation and to what capacity they are able to do that computation...and that this is how algorythems (shortcuts to computations) are made. So what we have is another Relativity principle here...just like Space and time is relative based on the observer...Information has a notion of relativity too...and in addition Quantum Mechanics has this same relativity issue....with the key being the role of observers. So the common issue in all three of these theories IS THE ROLE of the observer and this points to a hidden equivalence...that all three things manifest this way because there is physics that makes all of them equivalent and we do not know what that physics is. This is one reason I have studied and firmly believe in Steven Wolfram's physics model because he addresses ALL THREE of these issues of relativity into a single equivalence (Computational Equivalence) My friend...if you haven't already, you should look into Steven Wolfram's Physics model, and take a look at the lecture "How Universal is the Concept of Numbers." You will find that a lot of the intuitions you already have, he addresses those intuitions in a physics model that makes perfect sense.
Information is not located anywhere. Information in general is decentralized so it is not stored in one particular location. No one has opened the brain and found where information is stored. If information is fundamental we would be information as well so in essence we would be an information system describing other information systems.
I came here to learn how to invest after listening to a guy on radio talk about the importance of investing and how he made $460,000 in 4 months from $160k, somehow this video has helped shed light on some things, but I'm still confused, I'm a newbie and I'm open to ideas.
Having monitored my portfolio performance which has made a jaw dropping $370k from just the past two quarters alone, I have learned why experienced traders make enormous returns from the seemingly unknown market.
Interesting. I have a lump sum doing absolutely nothing at all in my bank account, I wanna get something started with it. You seem to be doing excellent for yourself, how do you achieve this?
They stop. That's because the information in your brain isn't like the information in a book, printed on a page. It's a dynamical, ongoing, propagation of constrained patterns and signals. If there's no "flow" there's no you. The position and links of the neurons themselves aren't enough to make you you.
@@monicaxxx4726 Well, if you're buried, your body will ultimately be returned to the earth. All of its proteins, fats, and sugars harvested for the energy they contain by detritivores, bacteria and fungi. "You" will become other living things, just like you've made other living things you your entire life. When you sleep and don't dream, well, that might be an interruption of consciousness, but your brain is smart enough to pick up where it left off, kind of like the persistence of image you experience when going to the movies. This is especially well evidenced by patients who undergo anesthesia. But what's after the big nothing? Well, nothing. The story ends. There is no transfer of the information processes in your brain to any other substrate capable of holding that information. Information is physical, and even if we'd like to call it a soul, there is nothing emitted by dying bodies in any known field within physics that could carry away your the information processes in your brain anywhere else. But to be honest, it's only scary if you don't wake up to that fact while you're alive, live your life to its fullest and dry to make a difference for the better during your briefly brilliant time here on Earth, as the particular arrangement of flowing organization that makes you you.
I can only understand "information" when it's tied to stuff (the baseball is traveling at 20 mph, etc.). I have no idea what information all by itself is.
Information isn't anything "by itself". Information is physical, and has to be "about something". The quantum view of information he describes sounds a lot like Von Neumann entropy/information, in that the uncertainty (i.e.: superposition) of states between the measurements (i.e.: interactions) of particles is entropy that is reduced to information upon entanglement with some other state; a process that reduces entropy locally while increasing it globally by growing the phase space of interactivity (growing the wave function of the universe you could say). This get's REAL muddy in the link forged between a young, hot, dense universe full of particles, inflation, and gravity's role as a boundary condition constraint on the speed of entropy production. Whatever mysteries that are left to be solved in physics fundamentally need to address this link. But, getting back to your point, the best way I've ever heard information described is as "a difference that makes a difference." I mean, just look at dark matter. It's dark precisely because we only have partial information about it. We can see its effect without being able to directly interact with it. What "is real" is anything we can use to conduct an experiment.
Entropy is not fully understood. Given that there are 2 arrows of time, forward and backward, the overall entropy of our universe is constant taking account of both forms of time. This can be expressed in as formula, featuring S. With regard to information we are venturing into the world conceived by Newton, whereby we can know the exact state of the universe, once we make measurements and apply the classical laws of physics. Quantum Mechanics tells us that this paradigm is false. Particularly with regard to the impact made by the Observer in determining the outcome of quantum states. In my view we appear to end up in this paradox, due to the dual arrow of time, and what the observer sees in backward time. In other words it is not the observer that is critical here, but rather our reduced capacity to see and understand events occurring in backward time.
Understanding " information" he is obscuring phisc. Instead show up information his needs axiom before understanding phisc information. Guys comments phichs show up nothing, so those only words.
Its possible that the Universe itself is trying to understand ... what "IT" is? It's a great idea to throw an encyclopedia and a dictionary into a blackhole haHAha :)
Yet, who gave formation to information? Who put in form, information? How did information come together to be able to put things into form? God's word the Bible is full of formed information.
The Digiorno Pizza commercial before this was interesting , the rest was bullshit and i'm not talking about Quantum pepperoni were talking about physics of information thats on the box by law !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Robert, you and your guests uselessly complicate the subject. "Information" is of only 2 kinds. The one that an entity ( object ) can create, and one that an entity can "receive". That's all there is. "Information" can be "seen" as "Entropy" and vice versa. Real life is not about what phisics and mathematics can reveal but about the real interactions between different entities. When you wrongly understand the real dynamics of the Universe and encapsulate this wrong understanding in wrong theories and postulates then you get very confused and don't understand anything correctly. That's the state of the today's "scientific" understanding which is wrong and erroneous. For example, there are no Black Holes anywhere in the Universe. The dynamic structure of the aggregates in the Universe cannot create the conditions for such "unnatural" material dynamics. In practical terms, the "material" aggregation of such thing has some natural limits, after which dissipation takes place ( after some natural limits of a local aggregation phase ). The Universe is a continuously aggregation of "entropic" "pumps", from the smallest microcosm to the largest macrocosm, that can be seen and understood. It functions in a very simple way of natural movement in the direction of least "resistance", of a least local and general so-called "density". The so-called "gravitation" is not "attractive" at all. It is universally and forever repulsive, pushing naturally and "unaffected" by anything ( because there's nothing else out there but "itself" ) continuously in all directions, so it takes the general direction of...?! Of what, Robert?😏 At the center of galaxies there are no Black Holes. It is just a place of very high entropic state, a kind of void combined with very high dynamic EM and dielectrical fields phenomena. Etc, etc. There is only one so-called "Universe" and it has no begining and no end. There is no "quantum", no "strings", no "entanglement". All real states create a neverending chain of natural "causes and effects", with temporary local reversed entropic "fluxes", all the time, the same, and perennial. That's all there is. ( And Robert, I know what you're looking for. The Artificial Consciousness is easy to be created in one simple day ( in a few hours if you really-truly know what you're doing. It will be realeased very soon on Earth. You're agitating yourself continuously for nothing because you can't do anything in this direction. )
@@kos-mos1127 intellect isn't physicial, or signals, feilds, energy, waves, aether, light, electromagnetism, gravity, form, etc. You have no proof to back up your claim, and negation does affirm God.
What regions can send information to other regions? God's word says, know the commandments I gave you, the information I gave you. Those who take his information get put into form of a vessel made without hands but of God's word and information of his word.
@@aaronaragon7838 yeah ,you see the post of the definition of inform? And how isn't any of that scientific observation? How else have our bodies been formed created and made? Cuz once a person dies a body is just an empty vessel with no life. Boy that was really a profound scientific observation. Merry Christmas hope you like the Christmas gift. Make sure you thank God for it in the name of Jesus Christ who is the ultimate gift giver of Life.
@@kos-mos1127 the bible is a scientific and metaphysical book and is real as the cosmos, astrology, human body, biochemistry, psychology, spirituality. You have no authority anyways. I doubt you can elaborate and decode a single page of the bible, yet you text like you know what's up. Sure...
@@S3RAVA3LM You have not authority either. The bible is not a scientific or metaphysical book. The bible is a work of mythology. Linguistically the bible is written in the structure of myth. Science and history are written in the objective sense meaning that writing style does not use personal pronouns. Science and history is written as a matter of fact.
![F.HERO Ft. JSPKK x ลำไย ไหทองคำ x M-PEE - ไม่สนิทบิดหมด (Thai Riders Anthem) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kPJZ0UihBfk/mqdefault.jpg)
this series of videos and explanations in nearly layman terms to the public, might be the single best approach for education in the world--insightful, fast moving, just enough technicals to prompt further research and still entertaining.
I appreciate you RLK!
Thais series of videos are brainswashing leyman to the public. This vídeos bobastic Science magazine which proposes is making Money. Baseless true.
@@maxwellsimoes238 Comment is gibberish.
@@johncarter1150 Not. Wong. Science sentence is true proposition. " information" hasnt true proposition instead only baseless words. See Russell books atomism philosophy . Feynman books. J C maxwell Works. Hawkins books. Model match is essencial in Science while axiom is principles.
@@johncarter1150 absolutely are you are wrong. Please show me mistake comments.
Look Trumpo, how are these videos brainwashing the lay public? Bannon has some nice anti-science videos. Go there.
The backgrounds in your videos are really good keep doing that. Add variety like interiors with strong colors, like what you see on a movie set. Keep it up
'Movie sets' have green screens....
@@DJSensei-n1x i meant cinematic aesthetic excuse my lack of specificity
@@AmarezMusic I apologise if I sounded rude, I was casually speaking with you, not against you! But I sincerely apologise if I sounded rude!
Btw James Webb's telescope's launch is almost live atm...
@@DJSensei-n1x maybe we're both rude lol
Information is the first step created when conciousness intends to digitize its analog existance into a material world.
The most interesting and fascinating type of information that is known to us so far is the complex functionally specified information (CFSI) which is prescriptive and purposeful. That kind of information is produced by mind. The regulatory genomics/epigenomics and the bio-electric morphogenetic code are examples of that kind of information.
Biology research is moving ahead making exciting discoveries, while Physics struggles with the standard models of cosmology and particle physics, inflation, string theory, multiverse, loop quantum gravity, and all that stuff and Neuroscience struggles with the hard problem of consciousness.
Like in data science it's like impossible for an AI to know where to look. But I can come up with it easily for eg: This population subset likes music, wonder how much of the lyrics is morose vs jolly, how were the moods of the time when the music came out, maybe we should look at what they were eating or not eating.
The way our minds can wander like that to clean up datasets is very strange. I think an AI can come to these questions but would require a lot of brute force processing.
I love your interviews. Greetings from Hungary 💗
Quantum Computing is still a nascent discipline whose following is at best a spark.
In quantum field mechanics, time information bits produce (measure?) energy information its?
The universe is a 2D information based hologram encoded in 3D. Space/Time is an illusion. Everything you experience is an illusion. Information is never lost. It cannot be lost or destroyed.
NTS 90/u/g
There is this way Chiara Marletto approaches information in her physicis of counterfactuals book which matches most of what Aguirre assigns as properties and information relations but say in his example of the information in the black hole it can also be understood as different configurations of the system and it’s micro states, the so called loose of information is just a property of the new system state, when some set of information merges into superposition which seems like information is lost when it’s just rearranged and some other set of states collapses from the wave function or interacts and therefore changes the state again in such a way once unitary state becomes multiple different other system state configuration, resulting in different “qualities” of entropy
Which we can easily (as easy as it can be done at home) experimentally test with photons, splitting and measuring V and H polarization of a laser with cheap lens and mirrors, as well as merging it again (maybe less cheaply) meaning one micro state can be seen as two different configurations, two equal configurations can be seem as just one (unitary) and two different configurations can be seem again as just one configuration but a different sort of unitary as it contains the two possible properties of that photon now; a simple arrangement of qbits with states being one among H, V or both HV, or in quantum computing, true, false or both T&F which is systematically split (therefore information seem lost, and can actually be accounted as lost under a strict information theory view, but becomes just rearranged) in example by the Peter Shor’s algorithm
dude becoming more look like a Einstein, big respect
Einstein was, so greater. He is Phisch magican. Baseless phichs is his comments are, so boring.
@@maxwellsimoes238 there is one alive scientist that you like ? except W.E.Coyote of course.
Why new episodes aren't being uploaded on Spotify? Really needed it.
Energy is information
Good discussion 🙏🙏🙏🙏
All quantities are qualified by information. The hard problem here is that while quantities are measurable, qualities are not.
Quality is the density of information.
@@kos-mos1127 Not only.
Information is the way that physicists try to grapple with reality according their paradigm of quantification - this doesn’t mean that reality is in its essence information
Not only is reality not composed of information, but information itself is not really a thing. It is a very useful mental construct which does not exist in nature.
@@caricue I would be careful of using the phrase mental contracts because all words and terminology are mental constructs that point to a real thing.
While information may be a mental construct it points to a real thing. For example if you want an apple you are not going how are you going to tell someone what you want without using information to describe it. Without information communication would be impossible.
The paradigm of information being physical started when John Von Neumann came up with an abstract machine that could create blue prints and anything that is possible known as a quantum cellular automata. This abstract machine had an infinite array with an indefinite number of network nodes that were the atoms of space. Upon studying the QCA they found parallels to the Cosmos. A Quantum Cellular Automata is reversible, symmetric, isotropic and homogeneous just like the Cosmos. It is also time-symmetric meaning the rules works both forward and backward in time which sounds a lot like the laws of physics. Around 1970 physics started to model the Cosmos as a giant Quantum Cellular Automata to study fundamental physics and come up with new theories.
@@kos-mos1127 So many people seem to be confused on this point, and many of them call themselves scientists. Nature does not do information. DNA is not an information carrier and information processing computers are mechanisms that don't know anything, especially about information. Sloppy language leads to sloppy thinking.
@@caricue Science has been using analogies to explain physical concepts. The worst analogy is comparing the human brain with a computer. Also comparing the Cosmos to mechanical clock was horrible as well.
"It from bit." John Archibald Wheeler. It's me, Mr. Brevity, getting to the point.
Is Bolzman entropy related to the volume of the information? How would Bolzman entropy relation to volume factor in to black hole information based on surface area, not volume?
It does not Physics need a new theory to describe information of a black hole
Inside black hole, could information become quantum? With Hawking radiation based on quantum mechanics, might not information leave black hole along with thermal radiation? Matter information could be reduced to energy as quantum waves in black hole?
"Make measurements in future". But you can't. All is really information, is it fundamental, yes.
what cannot be defines what can be
aaaaand ive not understood a word ....
It's like going blindfolded and muted in a football match and expected to score a goal... so if you want to increase your chance of scoring you most likely will need access to some environmental information...
I find this hard to understand because I don't understand unitarity in quantum mechanics. I think that's key to understanding the issue with Hawking radiation. Every video I've seen on the problem just glides over it, never explaining why unitarity is so fundamental to quantum physics!
@@r2c3 but ...at least ...i was not alone ... there are people trapped in the net asking for some water ...
@@francesco5581 :) the net is big enough for us all...
@@gyozakeynsianism This is only my own bizarre understanding, but the quantum nature is to strive for unity or symmetry with "spin" trying to shape a perfect object and while not doing so, creates a "field". It does this in the EM which dissipates, and info is the leftover (or the wall) between the creation and dissipation. The sun approaches closely this perfect object and so does the black hole, and they balance each other by expanding and contracting time space field, so necessarily there's leakage. The information is just along for the ride.
Another way to see it might be as the Higg's Bosun field as an above ground swimming pool with a wall that the kids running around the outside of the pool wall can't climb. The kids and the space they run in are the EM. Look at the shapes, the pool is an object and the EM is a torus, topologically speaking. Look at the movements, the pool with only the movement of dilation, while the kids can run rings or dart back and forth. Does the pool expand and contract, leaving a ring which dissipates further, into Planck lengths of motion, repeated as chemistry? The ring seems like the information, which is desirable and the impulse to join that and the source beyond is the Will to Power.
Well, seems to define information as the state of something that only exist but I see information to be present even in an empty space. Well, if you know that space is empty you have already defined information as zero so you have information at time t0, now evolution of information from time t0 to time T1 is just aggregation of space either empty or not.
Inside a black hole, could information be broken down into basic bits? Like when burning something leaves ashes and smoke?
I also have this question. I suspect our confusion comes from not understanding the concept of unitarity in quantum mechanics. I hope someone can explain it here!
@@gyozakeynsianism Unitarity means all probabilities have to add up to 1
@@kos-mos1127 OK, I get that the area under probability distributions must sum to 1. And I can see how this might be applied to quantum mechanics in the probability distribution of a wave function. But how does this create a paradox in black hole information loss?
@@gyozakeynsianism In Quantum Field Theory information is conserved because the filed contains all the information about the state of a system. In black holes information is loss meaning the system collapses into a single state which also violates the uncertainty principle.
I thought information was the basic bits, and in a black hole is condensed.
Anthony and Max are best friends. They both are quite radical.
I wonder if the totality is absolute information, and disorder/entropy is a feature of relative data.
If a ‘God’s Eye view’ were to exist, maybe ‘noise’ could only exist from a finite perspective, and chaos is really a myopic illusion.
That's exactly what it is. And surprisingly, most people don't understand that. You are one of the few people I've seen that gets it!
Like you said, Chaos is observer dependent...an illusion. If you had a double pendulum system and put it in front of two observers : one of them a scientist, the other a super computer...the scientist would observe chaos in the movement of the double pendulum...because that scientist is not able to track all the states in that system. The supercomputer by contrast has no issue making predictions about this double pendulum system because it can analyze all the states in that system. Therefor Chaos is an observer dependent phenomenon, meaning that Entropy (the measurement of randomness in a system) and the deduction of information from a system (Reducing predictable patterns from a system of random information), is based on the observer and their own level of computational capacity.
That's another thing about Entropy...is it's connection between randomness, and patterns. Randomness is in principle something that can not be predicted because there is no patterns to simplify that system. Whereas in a system that exhibits a pattern, you can reduce that behavior into an equation, and make predictions about that system. Because of the illusion of Chaos here...it means that this relationship is observer dependent...meaning patterns and randomness are based relative to who is doing the computation and to what capacity they are able to do that computation...and that this is how algorythems (shortcuts to computations) are made.
So what we have is another Relativity principle here...just like Space and time is relative based on the observer...Information has a notion of relativity too...and in addition Quantum Mechanics has this same relativity issue....with the key being the role of observers.
So the common issue in all three of these theories IS THE ROLE of the observer and this points to a hidden equivalence...that all three things manifest this way because there is physics that makes all of them equivalent and we do not know what that physics is. This is one reason I have studied and firmly believe in Steven Wolfram's physics model because he addresses ALL THREE of these issues of relativity into a single equivalence (Computational Equivalence)
My friend...if you haven't already, you should look into Steven Wolfram's Physics model, and take a look at the lecture "How Universal is the Concept of Numbers." You will find that a lot of the intuitions you already have, he addresses those intuitions in a physics model that makes perfect sense.
Going to check him out. Thanks for the response. 👍🏻
@@NightmareCourtPictures the concept of numbers is rather funny but useful
@@NightmareCourtPictures nicely said, by the way.
I think any information will be at the parameter of any system. If you have no parameters, you have no information. Or at least a lot less
Information is not located anywhere. Information in general is decentralized so it is not stored in one particular location. No one has opened the brain and found where information is stored. If information is fundamental we would be information as well so in essence we would be an information system describing other information systems.
what cannot be defines what can be
The Cosmos is more like a Quantum Cellular Automata than the clockwork universe of the past.
I came here to learn how to invest after listening to a guy on radio talk about the importance of investing and how he made $460,000 in 4 months from $160k, somehow this video has helped shed light on some things, but I'm still confused, I'm a newbie and I'm open to ideas.
Investing in stocks is a good idea, a good trading system would put you through many days of success.
It is possible to produce superior performance provided you do something different from the majority. However most of us tend to pay more
Having monitored my portfolio performance which has made a jaw dropping $370k from just the past two quarters alone, I have learned why experienced traders make enormous returns from the seemingly unknown market.
Interesting. I have a lump sum doing absolutely nothing at all in my bank account, I wanna get something started with it. You seem to be doing excellent for yourself, how do you achieve this?
@@SimonKelly7836 Exactly, the trick is to diversify your investment, don't panic when everyone else is and invest consistently.
When I die, whats happens to all the information (thoughts, memories, facts, musings etc.) crammed into my brain - where do they all go?
They stop. That's because the information in your brain isn't like the information in a book, printed on a page. It's a dynamical, ongoing, propagation of constrained patterns and signals. If there's no "flow" there's no you. The position and links of the neurons themselves aren't enough to make you you.
@@DrZedDrZedDrZed so where do we go whats after nothing everything black like when u go to sleep n dont dream ? So scary
@@monicaxxx4726 Well, if you're buried, your body will ultimately be returned to the earth. All of its proteins, fats, and sugars harvested for the energy they contain by detritivores, bacteria and fungi. "You" will become other living things, just like you've made other living things you your entire life. When you sleep and don't dream, well, that might be an interruption of consciousness, but your brain is smart enough to pick up where it left off, kind of like the persistence of image you experience when going to the movies. This is especially well evidenced by patients who undergo anesthesia. But what's after the big nothing? Well, nothing. The story ends. There is no transfer of the information processes in your brain to any other substrate capable of holding that information. Information is physical, and even if we'd like to call it a soul, there is nothing emitted by dying bodies in any known field within physics that could carry away your the information processes in your brain anywhere else. But to be honest, it's only scary if you don't wake up to that fact while you're alive, live your life to its fullest and dry to make a difference for the better during your briefly brilliant time here on Earth, as the particular arrangement of flowing organization that makes you you.
I can only understand "information" when it's tied to stuff (the baseball is traveling at 20 mph, etc.). I have no idea what information all by itself is.
Information isn't anything "by itself". Information is physical, and has to be "about something". The quantum view of information he describes sounds a lot like Von Neumann entropy/information, in that the uncertainty (i.e.: superposition) of states between the measurements (i.e.: interactions) of particles is entropy that is reduced to information upon entanglement with some other state; a process that reduces entropy locally while increasing it globally by growing the phase space of interactivity (growing the wave function of the universe you could say). This get's REAL muddy in the link forged between a young, hot, dense universe full of particles, inflation, and gravity's role as a boundary condition constraint on the speed of entropy production. Whatever mysteries that are left to be solved in physics fundamentally need to address this link. But, getting back to your point, the best way I've ever heard information described is as "a difference that makes a difference."
I mean, just look at dark matter. It's dark precisely because we only have partial information about it. We can see its effect without being able to directly interact with it. What "is real" is anything we can use to conduct an experiment.
Ah damn I need to do another 2-3 science bachelors
Entropy is not fully understood. Given that there are 2 arrows of time, forward and backward, the overall entropy of our universe is constant taking account of both forms of time. This can be expressed in as formula, featuring S. With regard to information we are venturing into the world conceived by Newton, whereby we can know the exact state of the universe, once we make measurements and apply the classical laws of physics. Quantum Mechanics tells us that this paradigm is false. Particularly with regard to the impact made by the Observer in determining the outcome of quantum states. In my view we appear to end up in this paradox, due to the dual arrow of time, and what the observer sees in backward time. In other words it is not the observer that is critical here, but rather our reduced capacity to see and understand events occurring in backward time.
Then for know The quantum information will always tell us The Knowledge always exist & existed 1st.
information theory as fundamental is more of dead end then string theory!
Understanding " information" he is obscuring phisc. Instead show up information his needs axiom before understanding phisc information. Guys comments phichs show up nothing, so those only words.
余少山信息学院
Its possible that the Universe itself is trying to understand ... what "IT" is? It's a great idea to throw an encyclopedia and a dictionary into a blackhole haHAha :)
🇺🇳4:59
Yet, who gave formation to information? Who put in form, information? How did information come together to be able to put things into form? God's word the Bible is full of formed information.
The Digiorno Pizza commercial before this was interesting , the rest was bullshit and i'm not talking about Quantum pepperoni were talking about physics of information thats on the box by law !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Robert, you and your guests uselessly complicate the subject.
"Information" is of only 2 kinds. The one that an entity ( object ) can create, and one that an entity can "receive".
That's all there is.
"Information" can be "seen" as "Entropy" and vice versa.
Real life is not about what phisics and mathematics can reveal but about the real interactions between different entities. When you wrongly understand the real dynamics of the Universe and encapsulate this wrong understanding in wrong theories and postulates then you get very confused and don't understand anything correctly.
That's the state of the today's "scientific" understanding which is wrong and erroneous.
For example, there are no Black Holes anywhere in the Universe.
The dynamic structure of the aggregates in the Universe cannot create the conditions for such "unnatural" material dynamics. In practical terms, the "material" aggregation of such thing has some natural limits, after which dissipation takes place ( after some natural limits of a local aggregation phase ).
The Universe is a continuously aggregation of "entropic" "pumps", from the smallest microcosm to the largest macrocosm, that can be seen and understood. It functions in a very simple way of natural movement in the direction of least "resistance", of a least local and general so-called "density".
The so-called "gravitation" is not "attractive" at all. It is universally and forever repulsive, pushing naturally and "unaffected" by anything ( because there's nothing else out there but "itself" ) continuously in all directions, so it takes the general direction of...?! Of what, Robert?😏
At the center of galaxies there are no Black Holes. It is just a place of very high entropic state, a kind of void combined with very high dynamic EM and dielectrical fields phenomena.
Etc, etc.
There is only one so-called "Universe" and it has no begining and no end.
There is no "quantum", no "strings", no "entanglement".
All real states create a neverending chain of natural "causes and effects", with temporary local reversed entropic "fluxes", all the time, the same, and perennial.
That's all there is.
( And Robert, I know what you're looking for. The Artificial Consciousness is easy to be created in one simple day ( in a few hours if you really-truly know what you're doing. It will be realeased very soon on Earth. You're agitating yourself continuously for nothing because you can't do anything in this direction. )
Spiritual is real,physical is God sustained. That is 100 % factual.
Rambling. 100% bobastic.
@@maxwellsimoes238 So when you die, what happens? Think about it for awhile...
Becareful with the word God. They have no name so you don't know who they are really. The true and living One has a name Jehovah
Spiritual is not real. Physical by definition means real. God does not sustain the physical it is physical that sustains god.
@@kos-mos1127 intellect isn't physicial, or signals, feilds, energy, waves, aether, light, electromagnetism, gravity, form, etc.
You have no proof to back up your claim, and negation does affirm God.
What regions can send information to other regions? God's word says, know the commandments I gave you, the information I gave you. Those who take his information get put into form of a vessel made without hands but of God's word and information of his word.
This is a science discussion. Not Alice in Wonderland.
@@aaronaragon7838 yeah ,you see the post of the definition of inform? And how isn't any of that scientific observation? How else have our bodies been formed created and made? Cuz once a person dies a body is just an empty vessel with no life. Boy that was really a profound scientific observation. Merry Christmas hope you like the Christmas gift. Make sure you thank God for it in the name of Jesus Christ who is the ultimate gift giver of Life.
The Bible is the real factual book.
The Bible is a mythological book. It is as factual as the Epic of Gilgamesh.
@@kos-mos1127 the bible is a scientific and metaphysical book and is real as the cosmos, astrology, human body, biochemistry, psychology, spirituality.
You have no authority anyways.
I doubt you can elaborate and decode a single page of the bible, yet you text like you know what's up.
Sure...
@@kos-mos1127 You can't prove it 😉 I know that it is!!!
@@S3RAVA3LM You have not authority either. The bible is not a scientific or metaphysical book. The bible is a work of mythology. Linguistically the bible is written in the structure of myth. Science and history are written in the objective sense meaning that writing style does not use personal pronouns. Science and history is written as a matter of fact.
@@kos-mos1127 i dont think galileo or newton would agree with you there