The discussion was very important, and the ideas raised by the guests are well-supported by a theoretical framework. Rogers Brubaker’s concept of “groupism” is particularly relevant here. Groupism oversimplifies ethnic identities by treating them as fixed and homogeneous. Instead, Brubaker suggests viewing ethnicity as dynamic and context-dependent. This perspective helps make sense of the complex nature of ethnic identities in Ethiopian politics.
Pls read a book written by different sociologist, archeologist and politician about nation and nationalities. In Ethiopian case the word nation and nationality is very much confused by politicians who didn't understand properly.
@tedoo548 0 seconds ago You mentioned why the displaced Amharas are not settled in their region.it is because Amhara region is being governed by the servants of Abiy
When Amharas are attacked as a minority in another region where they think it is safe and part of the society then all Amharas realize that they are Amhara first. The gust is saying if it was this or that. Stick to the reality. Should Amharas defend themselves or beg for their life when they are being killed every day?
The discussion was very important, and the ideas raised by the guests are well-supported by a theoretical framework. Rogers Brubaker’s concept of “groupism” is particularly relevant here. Groupism oversimplifies ethnic identities by treating them as fixed and homogeneous. Instead, Brubaker suggests viewing ethnicity as dynamic and context-dependent. This perspective helps make sense of the complex nature of ethnic identities in Ethiopian politics.
Pls read a book written by different sociologist, archeologist and politician about nation and nationalities. In Ethiopian case the word nation and nationality is very much confused by politicians who didn't understand properly.
mingizem media kezeh yeewerdee sew gar atewredu.
እባካችሁ በተቻላችሁ ጊዜ በአማረኛ እያወሪችሁ እንግሊዝኛውን ባታበዙት ጥሩ ነው ለሁሉም የእንግሊዝኛ ቃላቶች የአማረኛ ቃላቶች አሉ በብዛት
Yelem new melesu.
@tedoo548
0 seconds ago
You mentioned why the displaced Amharas are not settled in their region.it is because Amhara region is being governed by the servants of Abiy
Are you suggesting that Fano's claim of controlling 90% of the Amhara region not true?
Aye.... sorry Reyot.... he is cor
correct... there is no such a question....
When Amharas are attacked as a minority in another region where they think it is safe and part of the society then all Amharas realize that they are Amhara first. The gust is saying if it was this or that. Stick to the reality. Should Amharas defend themselves or beg for their life when they are being killed every day?