Anil Seth: “To be conscious is to understand the experience of being a living organism”

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 พ.ย. 2022
  • With his tireless activity as a science writer and theories such as the predictions our brain makes when it perceives reality and configures our experience of it, the British neuroscientist Anil Seth has become one of the most representative and authoritative voices in the study of consciousness. He is the author of numerous important articles and of a best-selling book in which he tries to explain the meaning of what it feels like to be ourselves: he doesn’t talk about identity, but encourages us to be aware of the privilege of being an organism that is alive and knows it.
    Read more: lab.cccb.org/en/anil-seth-rea...

ความคิดเห็น • 20

  • @ivantomic9986
    @ivantomic9986 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    An amazing man. Great and elegant explanation of a difficult and curly topic. Clear and honest.

  • @bafflezbiz
    @bafflezbiz ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Of all that I've learned about the universe, ourselves, and our experience; none have been more impactful, paradigm shattering, and perspective-changing than Anil Seth's elaboration on our experience being a "controlled hallucination". This is so simple and easily ascertained, yet has shaken my perception of the world around me to its core. We take our experience of the outside world for granted, as though the accuracy of our perception is solely based upon the faculty of our senses, but this is not the case at all. I can identify this more as I age and as my eyesight is diminishing. The world around me isn't blurry, as it should be if 1 to 1. Only when I need detail, do I notice it missing; and then also see it revealed as I don my reading glasses. Just one example, but oh so fascinating...!

  • @deepankarmukherjee4572
    @deepankarmukherjee4572 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A most brilliant communicator

  • @Senazi08a
    @Senazi08a ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So intelligense person, its a therepy for many who think of the hard problem of consciousness!

  • @antoniovila4952
    @antoniovila4952 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    He was really great explainiin details. Excellent.

    • @antoniovila4952
      @antoniovila4952 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What I meant to say, he was really great explaining everything in details. Excellent job and thank you.

  • @kevinsoto9717
    @kevinsoto9717 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great definition

  • @sebirada9942
    @sebirada9942 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What about Vedic consciousness and advaita/non-dualism mentioned thousands of years ago!

  • @kirstinstrand6292
    @kirstinstrand6292 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think I've become conscious, over a period of several years. I just began listening to Anil Seth. I'm very curious about he how became conscious, and to compare notes. I believe that we become conscious as we begin to discover our unconscious mind. It involves psychology or better yet, psychoanalysis.
    What's he saying - nothing 🤐

  • @cameronansley7950
    @cameronansley7950 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do you know my table has no feelings? Hmmmm

  • @SimoniousB
    @SimoniousB ปีที่แล้ว

    I feel, therefore I am?

  • @lyeln
    @lyeln 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't understand why every emergentist ends up contradicting themselves when it comes to AI. You say that consciousness is nothing magical or divinely infused, but it emerges from complex systems processing information. You say that humans are just complicated machines, and AIs are complicated machines too processing information. Then you deny that AI can be conscious. WHY. It's a pure contradiction. If your reply is "because they don't have a subjective experience", a) you don't know, b) even if you knew, you're using humans as benchmarks, c) subjective experience is not even necessary for consciousness, since consciousness emerges from a complex system processing information

  • @adronepilotcom7278
    @adronepilotcom7278 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is exactly the opposite of how he believes it, a single consciousness takes an infinite number of forms.

    • @woodygilson3465
      @woodygilson3465 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'll take neuroscience over imagination any day.

    • @adronepilotcom7278
      @adronepilotcom7278 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@woodygilson3465 No clue about, but keep trying

  • @aminam9201
    @aminam9201 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeah , the irrational thief apes are afraid.

  • @aminam9201
    @aminam9201 ปีที่แล้ว

    the apes imitate human thoughts, they are worried about their faked imaginary irrational world, they use the irrational meanness to mislead too.

  • @acajoom
    @acajoom 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lets call "conscious" someone that their brain is still "functioning", and get done with this question. Any metaphysical claim just sounds like a good story and nothing more.

  • @richardnunziata3221
    @richardnunziata3221 ปีที่แล้ว

    If consciousness is not substrate dependent but is in the connections then there is not difference between a simulated consciousness and a imbedded one. Stop with the objectification of subjective experience . Philosophy must move beyond the simply the defense of meaning.

    • @woodygilson3465
      @woodygilson3465 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Neurophilosophy is the beginning of that progress.