ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024
- What if everything we know about prehistoric humans is wrong? Journalist Graham Hancock visits archeological sites around the world to uncover whether a civilization far more advanced than we ever believed possible existed thousands of years ago.
SUBSCRIBE: bit.ly/29qBUt7
About Netflix:
Netflix is the world's leading streaming entertainment service with 221 million paid memberships in over 190 countries enjoying TV series, documentaries, feature films and mobile games across a wide variety of genres and languages. Members can watch as much as they want, anytime, anywhere, on any Internet-connected screen. Members can play, pause and resume watching, all without commercials or commitments.
Ancient Apocalypse | Official Trailer | Netflix
/ netflix
Journalist Graham Hancock travels the globe hunting for evidence of mysterious, lost civilizations dating back to the last Ice Age.
![ได้เวลา! พาน้องแฝดฉีดวัคซีนครบ 1 เดือน🫣 [cc] แดนแพทตี้ SS2 | EP.52 |](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IzeLtaXBLNE/mqdefault.jpg)
miniminuteman had a fieldtrip with this
Milo's videos skip over/leave out a lot of what Graham actually says
@@chrisgaming9567That's because a lot of what Hancock says is straight up distorting evidence or inventing evidence where there is none.
@@infinity8543 Then it should be easy to debunk, shouldn't it? So why ignore it?
@@chrisgaming9567 Claims are meant to be provided with actual evidence first. There's a reason why Hancock doesn't have the courage to actually write a paper and publish it, unlike any other notable archeologist.
There are hundreds of people criticizing his pseudohistory. Ask him to address it like an actual scientist, rather than playing victim and scream "biG aCadEmIA" to justify his nonsense.
@@infinity8543 In other words, you don't know anything about the way that he presents his hypotheses. You just hear about it second-hand from people who hate him.
Episode 8 did not talk about the Bonneville flood. It is well documented and described but mysteriously left out of the show. It begs to question what else is left out of his investigation
Everything. Everything is left out. He's a fraud. He used to believe in Ancient Martians coming to Earth and teaching everyone how to stack rocks into temples. Then he swapped to Atlanteans when people said he was full of shit.
Just about everything imaginable from an archaeological stand point. How anyone took this series seriously is a blight on current education standards and critical thinking skills.
Ok, Netflix, THIS is the type of content quality that keeps me subscribed.
I must admit my expectations got kinda subverted. After all the articles I have read I was expecting this series to be loaded some weird conspiracy stuff but it was very grounded, informative and entertaining. In the first episodes the very high production value caught me. The shots are incredible, the sound design impressive and let's be honest.. Graham Hancock is a wonderful presenter. Also.... I REALLY appreciate a show treating it's viewer in a respectable way instead of insulting their intelligence over and over again. In every single episode ou can feel all the passion and thought which was put into this series. The structure was great keeping it very fast paced while yet still understandable to everyone and being at the ~25min lenght per episode made it easy to watch it whenever there was enough time.
I knew there wasn't too much actual new stuff for me so I have planned to just keep it running while getting some other stuff done. I'm surprised how quick the series managed to pull all my attention and kept me fascinated until the very last frame.
And no, by praising it I do say I take every of the show's presented theory as fact. The show doesn't either. It gives thoughts to think about. That's all.
High production value, a charismatic presenter and a fun theory, to distract from the fact that it's pure pseudoscience
@@rwt2320 Ye, you are right, mostly this is fun. ;) But how much of it is pseudoscience...? A lot for sure. But many things to criticise apply sadly just as much to a lot of topics in the "official science" or however you wanna call it. Sadly both are sometimes/often giving actual science a bad name.
PLEASE GIVE US SEASON 2.. This is an amazing docuseries, love Graham Hancocks work and thought provoking questions!
Just so you know, Sean Hancock is a senior manager for unscripted originals at Netflix. That's got to have a lot do with this docuseries getting green lit. Sean is Graham's son if you didn't already guess.
And?
@@kyleleon85 2+2=4
Why don't you try putting 2 and 2 together, see what you get :smh:
@@Makavelian1987 does this connection delegitimization his findings and his opinions?
@Kyle Leon not at all and that's not what I was getting at. I was merely pointing out that his son must have had a big role in this docuseries being made for netflix. What with it not being mainstream, and being pseudoscience woo woo :wink wink:
I'm a massive fan of Graham's work, by the way.
@@kyleleon85 You do know that this is all BS. Right?
do a search on YT for "Graham Hancock and the evidence for his 'Ancient Apocalypse' (Episode one) "
I absolutely LOOOOOVED it ! We need more seasons as the evidence keep gathering over time !
This is the best mini-series on Netflix by a long shot !!!!!!
Thank you Graham Hancock for all your hard work all these decades, moving forward upstream against established academia who refuses to acknowledge new evidence like the senile dinosaurs they are. You will go down in History as one of the men who re-established Historical truth by unearthing the secrets of ancient civilisations
Ask yourself the question: What is more likely: That "mainstream archeology" are all conspiring to cover up something of this magnitude, or simply that people find wild theorising from charismatic people like Hancock more compelling than the rigid actual science done by faceless people in universities.
Finally a show on Netflix I want to watch!
No kidding! 😄👍
Oh please.
@@lmfao7558 I watched it on a friends account it's pretty good. Don't be a fascist people can believe what they want.
@@tomparmenter8665 You can believe what you want but that doesn't mean people can't tell you that what you believe is factually untrue
@@ethanlivemere1162 True I can tell them that what they believe is untrue. Are we going to get into 'what is the true' augment?
I watched the series and totally enjoyed it.
Gracham you should explore bosnian mountains because there are many many foundings of the remainings of ships.That is strange because the sea dissapeard 8 million years ago
Finally something to make me reverse my cancelation.
So excited! I've been a fan of Graham Hancock for a long time and have read several of his books. Important work he does that gives us glimpses of a different kind of history. Thanks Netflix!
Hancocks specialty is convincing people of mysteries whether they exist or not.
I hope he has Randal Carlson also involved, the podcasts they had with Rogan were great.
Glad to see you back doing something like this, you thoroughly deserve it. I have all your books, you taught me to see the world in a different, more magical way. Thanks, Graham
I haven't read his books, where would be a good place to start please? Thanks
@@mattbushell8343 Hi Matt, I started on Fingerprints of The Gods, then moved onto Supernatural, then Underworld. After that I was hooked and got everything, and re read them all by release date. But Fingerprints & Supernatural still resonate in my mind most strongly. Hope they have the same effect for you as they did for me ;)
@@mattbushell8343 You can listen to Graham read them on TH-cam.
@@notreally2406 thanks I'll search them out!
This guy's a hack
They actually gave this fraud a Netflix series? What a world we live in. Grifters abound.
What was the fraud
This isn't a documentary. This is false info being presented as a possible truth:-: with absolutely no backing. Please. Understand
How much cash you've got from those who are suppressing the actual human history and don't want them to reveal infront of public ?
This isn't a conspiracy theory, it's speculation and imagination... which is not a bad thing, it's how hypotheses and discoveries are made. He's not making any proclamations as fact, from what I've seen so far.
I'm almost done watching this series and in all honestly it's interesting. Is it entertaining? Yes absolutely. Does it open your mind and make you ponder? Yes it does. However it makes you a little too open minded that your brains fall out of your skull. It's like Graham Hancock is onto something, but we never truly know what that something is. I don't even think he knows what it is. He does make some great points about how our ancestors were not as primitive as we think they were or how mainstream archaeology is not researching important ancient structures when they should be. All of this is true. However the evidence he has to prove that these civilizations are connected to one another is based on false ideologies. For example he keeps mentioning a great flood that occurred during the end of the ice age. While it is true that great flooding happened around this period, there was no global flood. He makes it seem like these floods happened all at once, and this alone leads to conspiracy theorists and religious nutjobs easily falling for this manipulative trap. Hancock even openly admitted in the series that he believes that myths should be counted as evidence for his theory. That is not how science works, you can't use myths as evidence because they are flawed or corrupted chain of word. In the same way we wouldn't use a fictional novel as a piece of evidence to a court case murder. Hancock does not have full evidence if at all to support his claim. I think instead of saying that there was this massive mysterious global civilization, he should say that he believes that there were advanced ancient civilizations before the ice age but that they were largely wiped out. This is partially true and has greater evidence to back it up. Not the other way around.
I wonder if he actually drinks his own Kool aid or if he's aware and just doing it for fun. Based on his repeated comments about his critics it makes it sound like he's drinking it and got his feelings hurt. Either way this needs to be clearly labeled the same way shows like "ghost hunters" or w.e are labelled.
No way he believes anything he says, it's so wild and outlandish and has 0 traces of evidence for it. If there was at least a little evidence that made some sense, maybe... But he just says random stuff with no evidence, no backing or anything and insists it's true.
after seeing this show, I really see the parallel of ancient void century One Piece is starting to tackle. I do both enjoying it for entertainment purpose only but all of the free thinkers have every right to at least look at this docu. One thing is for certain, those message written on the rocks were done to tell “we are here and we existed”. I still believe there are a lot to be discovered under our ocean floors but only time can unearth it, maybe to other future civilizations that will survive our own civilization’s cataclysm.
While I’ve been to poverty point many times as a child. I cannot wait to go back now!
what a quack
and oh boy are that a metric ton of bots in the comments
Can't wait for season 2!!!
I'm SOOOOOO excited for this! I can't wait to watch it... if only I had Netflix. xD Haha! But, man, I have been listening in on Joe Rogan's interviews with Mr. Hancock, and I'm psyched to watch this. If it garners major acclaim and gets a 2nd season (PLEASE Netflix!!!), I'm excited to hear about psychedelics.
Yes!
I Can NOT Wait for this to drop!!!
There’s a real feeling of resentment to academics that is always apparent with Hancock. This is no exception. He sounds like a jealous ex wife sometimes.
Great comedy series. I love the idea of a series that follows an obviously crazy conspiracy theorist and his dumb idea- wait this is serious?
If that's how every new idea is treated, how is any progress in anything expected to be made?
This was the wildest shit I’ve seen in a while. Conspiracy dressed as reason. Great!
Eh, I'd say it's more the opposite, so much of the show is Graham saying "people say I'm crazy lol" and in the end he's just sharing some neat archaeological ideas
I don't think conspiracy means what you think it means. 😂
Hancock is great. The meltdown of TH-cam "science experts" is hilarious too.
Yeah the magical aliens from the horsehead nebula want to label you "smartest human of all time" and make you their emperor too, seeing as you believe anything random people say with no evidence lmao
@@thegatorhator6822 You're just making a fool of yourself lmao
@@chrisgaming9567 buddy you're here fanboying over a fraud who says insane shit with no evidence. You're a clown, except clowns are intentionally funny meanwhile your joke of an existence is what we're laughing at.
We don't want to hear it - because it's utter nonsense. File under fantasy.
Amazing how corporate media is attacking this show.
Graham gives credible evidence to support his theories which is fascinating.
Something corporate media doesn't do 😅
But why are they attacking it? How is it a threat to them?
Ah yes pseudoscience, how enjoyable
Yo @Netflix , renew Ancient Apocalypse for S2!
They'll release a season 2, Keanu Reeves will even appear in it.
Is this why Dead End Paranormal Park and Inside Job was canceled for this? Mini Minute Man cover this series well at how false it is.
I wanna smoke what this guy smokes.
Lies? Lol
Cool, but, do you know miniminuteman?
I watched his videos while watching this series. He does a really bad job at showing what the series actually says.
It was awful. No real facts, no real scientific evidence, just proposals and "I think maybe it's like that because I want". This guy has some real problems or psychological traumas because of archeologists, geologists and other people from the world of science whom he hates. I always ready to think about alternative ideas and other opinions, but when I got literally NOTHING, JUST opinion and that's all, it's ridiculous. Netflix, have courage and make a movie with real facts so they could have some kind of debates or discussion. 👀
Don’t waste your time. I’ll tell you what happens.
It’s a compilation in each episode of the main character who doesn’t have credentials or proof but theories. Each episode starts with “could it be that….” And ends with “well, we will never know, but could it be that maybe archaeologists are wrong?” Says an untrained dude. Entertaining to see. (FAKE NEWS).
“I don’t know, therefore Atlantis”
It always makes me very sceptic when people use the phrase "the so called experts", without actually naming anyone in particular. It's an entertaining programme overall but that's about it. The giant leaps it makes in judgement at some points makes it anecdotal.
Zahi Hawass, that's an expert for you.
When you have no evidence, the only way to convince people is to jump on the "us vs them" bandwagon.
@@infinity8543or he doesnt wanna get sued. Its quite simple.
If you listen to some of his podcasts he makes it clear how much archeologist hate him because he is stating things which makes their work faulty. Evidence they ignore.
@@oskarwiegaard Sue? You really think academics sue others for referencing their works?
Holy shit, you have negative knowledge about how academia works. No wonder why you think he has "evidence".
It's a fact there was a world wide flood, and a fact other people lived here before the current native Americans. Both can't be disputed even NA tribes tell stories how they were not the first people here. Isolationism is a lie
A journalist who investigates things and doesn't just say Trump bad all day.
This is just speculation to the point of absurdity
What an unscientific and disappointing show...
Yeah it was horrible. Between the dramatic music every minute and the dishonest editing there is only self-bias. I was so looking forward to this documentary but it's so dishonestly made this comment section just show how little is needed for them to be sold on every piece of it. That's coming from someone who wants to believe.
Some crazy fuckers in the comments lol
10 bucks says 90% are bots.
I've always had a serious distrust of so called "experts" This guy makes some excellent points and has an intelligent open mind. He should ld definitely due the Parks Department for banning him. No American citizen should be banned from an American park. I'm appalled by that behavior and believe it to be an infringement if his rights.
It literally didn't happen. That site isn't owned by the US Government, to begin with, it's owned by the local native american tribe. Beyond that, he literally was never banned from entering, he was denied a request to reserve the location for a four day long filming session with a full camera crew. He was still welcome to enter it at any time and to film it with civilian filming equipment. Hancock is a serial liar, because he is a con-man.
You distrust "experts" because you've been told to distrust them by charismatic con-artists like Hancock. We have EXTENSIVE documentation that he's a liar and just makes garbage up to sell books. The first episode of this series contains the most egregious example of him just lying and making trash up. Graham Hancock randomly asserts that Nan Madol might be as old as 16,000+ years old with no evidence, just his claim. But we know from uranium series dating of the building materials of Nan Madol, cultural layer dating of the surrounding areas and because the local people LITERALLY HAVE DOCUMENTATION OF IT'S CONSTRUCTION that it's 900 years old. You can find this out with literally 10 - 20 minutes of research into the topic.
But Graham repeatedly hammers it into your skull every few chapters to "distrust the experts." Why do you think every scientist on the planet is entered into some kind of shadowy cabal to keep secrets from you? I don't even know why I'm typing this, you're just going to call me an evil scientist man hiding the truth from you because you've been programmed by a cult lmao
Graham Hancock likes the journey of doing research and speculating so much that he doesn’t seem to reach his “destination”. He does good work, but is pride and naïve on this part. Completely ignoring, and putting aside all the ancient story’s about the work of giants on the pyramids in the Ancient Apocalypse”. The stories tell of giants who build a small pyramid in a couple of days.. He simply does not like that idee, its to simpel for him, and directly puts it aside, like its nothing! A huge "mistake" in my opinion. He holds on to his own vision instead of doing research of the information tha
t he finds
My boy Graham is finally about to get the audience his ideas deserve!!!
👏👏👏
This reply isn’t to you. It’s to the potential you of a few years from now. Don’t feel silly that believed Hancock. He is very good at what he does and the internet algorithm was against you.
@@AIenSmithee ok, numbskull...lol!
@@gimmethepinkelephant3685 man I’m jealous of you. Still so much stupid shit to believe in. Kinda sucks when you realise all those cool conspiracy theories are stupid.
@@AIenSmithee why is he lying ? Please explain
@@SlowN55F22 be honest Juan there is no point. As if you would listen to me.
He is just ‘ Fake Story Teller ‘ . He has made up his ‘ History ‘ imagination , then , he talks his opinions are ‘ Actual ‘ or ‘ Real ‘ Without ‘ Facts ‘ of Archeology .
I don’t like his Ideas , it’s like Agitating to his career or his Big Income .
Fake story is ‘ Fiction ‘ , Not Nonfiction .
I barely survived the first episode. If Mr. Hancock would stop posing around so much, the show might be tolerable. He comes across as a self-righteous narcissist who's more in love with himself than his show. The constant shots of him looking at the sky, the horizon, or into the damn void are incredibly annoying. I'm interested in the information and not in some dude who constantly puts himself on the screen instead of letting his discoveries do the talking.
The guy Milo debunking this has more views then all of this show and is the first thing to pop up when you search. Get dunked on.
I've watched the first 4 episodes, there's a lot of stuff Milo completely skips over and leaves out for some reason
@@chrisgaming9567 because one, if he debunked every single brain dead theory and fact this guy tried to spout off. We'd be here all day. Kinda just a round robin of most base and "important" facts that he's trying to cover.
@@gamingidiots7495 Each of Milo's videos covered two episodes. If the main worry was watchtime he could've done one episode per video. And it's debatable if he really focused on the most important stuff.
I put this netflix series on to watch in the background, I like doing that with a lot of the docuseries netflix has out, like the ones about ancient Rome. But this was downright painful to watch. He literally whines the whole time that archeologists use the standard tools of their trade to date stuff and tell us those dates. Like no shit, what else are they supposed to do. He goes on and on that stuff can predate the actual time that these ancient people carved into to wall. Well duh, but he has no clue when, and his guess is as good as anyone else's. I got as far as him suggesting that something must have happened more than 10k years before the oldest dated telling of the story. The likelihood that a story was passed down for 10k years, passed down accurately, is ridiculous. These are times when whole groups of people would die off, and yet they kept this one story alive. This guy is just playing victim for attention.
He brought us a beautiful series but with zero scientific method. The stories that he imagines and describes are great, I'd like to hear more of then. But, please, don't take it extremely serious and doubt real archeologists.
Ohhh no...the comments believe this shit
Mmmm, I started watching it. The part where he said massive hexagonal stone cut out as building material. He said that is formed by magma as it dries out.. that right there says alot, there is no way that magma dries up in hexagonal shapes. Know damn well what that was and is.
I asked 3 people here, who were tryna debunk GH ...what exActly are you disagreeing with and where is yr evidence, not a single one could give One example ...even after a week's worth of interrogation, asking from every angle
It seems a lot of people are completely disconnected from their creative intelligence, their heart, their soul
Yet We Are STRONG and we ARE LIGHT
WE CAN BE HAVING A GREAT TIME IF WE CHOOSE TO!!🎯🧚♀️🌟
THANKYOU GRAHAM HANCOCK🌟💛
Bro graham is saying ancient people had psychic abilities.........if you think people will give u any time trying to argue against such bs....then i have no words for u
@@azmainfaiak8111 He has never said that, stop lying.
GH has no evidence for his theories is all so debunking requires you get a head for real archeology which is more interesting than GH bunkum.
@@dnavid "No evidence" you clowns just keep echoing each others' low IQ babbling in the hopes it'll actually mean something if you just repeat it enough.
Every time he brings up evidence, they don't care. In the debate between him and Dibble, Hancok asserted that due to rise in water level a lot of the ancient structures would be below sea level. He then shows pictures of Japan's Ryukyu Islands which appear to heavily show just that.
But do you care? Did Dibble care? Of course not, he just says "that's just a picture, I'd have to be there to check for myself, but I'll never do that so..." But then he bases other claims on anecdotal reports from colleagues like you can't make this shit up.
The thing I hate most about intellectually lazy people that make statements like yours is that you think hiding behind someone conventionally academically trained will automatically put you on the side of truth. Nah sorry buddy, you're still gonna have to do some thinking of your own.
People acutally believe in this pesudoscience?
Robin McKie, science editor for The Guardian writes: Flint Dibble, an archaeologist at Cardiff University, described Hancock’s basic thesis as “flawed thinking”. Archaeologists don’t hate him, as he claims. “It is simply that we strongly believe he is wrong”...
Nothing wrong with debate though. His theories were called "racist" and "dangerous".
@@Mustang1984 Because they are racist? If I took all the accomplishments from European civilizations and attributed them to some mysterious civilization without any evidence, European Hancock fans would be the first to cry about "an attack on western civilization".
@@Mustang1984 The problem is Netflix airing psuedoscience cause the guy's entertaining
@@rwt2320 Pseudoscience is an arrogant term assigned to anyone who has an opinion different from the mainstream narrative.
Hancock isn't a scientist and doesn't claim to be one. He works with actual scientists to research ancient historical sites and then presents his own alternative theories.
Isn't that kinda how.. Uhh.. LITERALLY how any theories in this field are formed? From research of places and connecting all the dots?
Oh wait, right! Graham can't do this because he hasn't got a title and his theories are far too different from the already established ones!
So automatically everything he says is pseudoscience.
Remember that these accusations come from the very same people who claim that Gobekli Tepe was built by f*cking HUNTERS AND GATHERERS!
I mean, how can you even take these people seriously when they can't even question their own based theories when faced with new facts.
Instead they will rather stubbornly claim that the people, who were supposed to live in mud huts (at best), have built such a monolithic mega-structure. Allegedly before the invention of wheel...... yeah, right 🤡🤡
Seems like they are scared of a little truth. Science said there was no older civilations them Egypt and Sumerian, untill they discovered globeki tepi. They have no idea what they are talking about or purposely not telling the truth
PSEUDO- SCIENCE 101: Say anything, since my son is the head of “unscripted originals”. Doesn't matter if I have anything to back up what I am saying. 😡😡😡😡
This is a blanket statement. He has quite a few researchers and methodologies, that back up certain things that he says. When he is speculating or giving alternative theories, he says so.
What if Graham Hancock is wrong? What if Graham Hancock is just making stuff up to make a buck?
I'm not an archeologist. I'm just asking questions.
If he's just making stuff up, then it's an awfully weird coincidence that the evidence all adds up in his favour
His theories are so far-fetched and racist, in good ol' von-Däniken style, that it's laughable and as an Archaeologist myself, I found it even more so. However, the docu-series was certainly one of the best ancient history documentaries I've had the pleasure to watch. It was engaging and thought-provoking - exactly what streaming services are made for.
can you explain what is racist about it? thanks...
@@armshousetoyourmumshouse
Yeah sure.
It is common for pseudo-archaeologists like Graham Hancock and Erich von-Däniken to paint a cloud of mystery and skepticism around non-European archaeology.
They begin by casting a shadow over any genius astrological and homogenous architecture and innovation found in distant lands of distant times, like Easter Island for instance.
They then go on to claim how these amazing feats of human activity may be related or that they may have been guided or aided by another population of more intelligent humans. The Romans were fiercely intelligent and powerful, capable of amazing feats, but oh no, the Rapa Nui could never have carved the Moai when they're so undeveloped in their society.
Believe it or not, but our collective intelligence and capacity for greatness evolved long before the after math of the Ice Age. And everything, no matter who you are or where you're from, can easily be explained. Archaeology and the human past isn't shrouded in mysticism. It's disrespectful, actually, to make claims that our ancestors were less developed than we are, and that their great feats must have come elsewhere.
How would you like it if, say you got an A + on a difficult exam, and 1000 years later, only for someone to say, 'oh no, from what we understand of their life and intelligence, there is no way they actually earn't that A+.'
@@Slam_24 Good point.
Nothing far fetched or racist
@@RazPerignon Theres LOTS that is far fetched in this TV show.... Racist? I dont think its outwardly racist, but there are racial undertones...
While an interesting watch, why you would include any Joe Rogan take in it just further delegitimizes the things he has to say.
Still interesting, but yikes.
idk why but I watched one episode and he keeps showing that Joe Rogan clip, because I guess he couldn't find any other clips of people taking him seriously. Giant red flag.
Hey so I'm a huge fan of archeology and anthropology, this person's positions honestly concern me but I don't want to write them off and I do want to watch this series with an open mind.
I'm just extremely concerned about cherry picking data to fit preconceived notions and while I know that many archaeologists are guilty of that I feel that this person might also be guilty of the same thing.
I want to be very clear that I'm not trying to pick a fight I am seriously only looking for more information.
if it concerns you then maybe you are biased in some way? You seem pretty smart, take a look at what he has to say and the data and think for yourself. Check out this guy speaking with randy carlson on joe rogan.
You should be concerned- this clown has a long history of making up whatever bs he thinks will sell books, and ignores the preponderance of evidence, which proves his nuttery wrong. He's a con man, tricking simpletons into buying his books, while he pretends he's persecuted by the establishment because they're all trying to hide great secrets. Total rubbish made to con conspiracy theorists.
@@Wassenhoven420 lmaoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo listen to the insane schizophrenic ramblings. Joe Rogan fans are a special kind of mentally handicapped.
The next Velikovsky? …but will you ever consider electromagnetism? 🤜🏼⚡️🤛🏻
I watched the series and the guy has a point and the claims make sensse.
Ohhh no...the comments believe this shit
Must Watch 🎉
Ancient of Apocalypse more like need more evidence
I love the subject matter, but this show is so ridiculously over produced. They need to chill on the slow mo action shots it’s too much!
Yeah I felt the same way about production, it was almost annoying
A show about nothing has already been done.
I found the show quite narrow minded tbh. He claims that archaeologist are stubborn in their ideas but doesn’t even represent the current theories on most of the areas shown on the show as it contradicts his one sided view. Interesting stuff for sure but a man wanting to see evidence of ancient civilisations will always see evidence of ancient civilisations.
Better history teaching than I learned in school.
Nice! Pseudo science and Ancient Aliens-like content coming to Netflix…So they at last understood that flat-earthers were actual public they could attract as consumers! Right on!
Yeah and u know everything ? We don’t even know how we were created just told to us and that’s it. Life is a mystery and always will be
What does flat-earthers have to do with this?
Finally! Something rather interesting from Netflix that isn't gay ghosts or gay cowboys eating pudding.
Based on this comments. I wonder how many actually think this is real and know that it's just fictional. So many gullible people.
Oh Netflix, what are you doing jumping on the psuedoscience bandwagon?
@Michelle There are better ways to do it.
Another terrible pseudoscientific Netflix series to add to the pile 🚮
Cope buddy
Hilarious haters like you are the reason why Graham is getting so popular and more and more appreciated by the day 😂😂😂
This must be so painful for you
@@corentinbm9091 Lol, sure champ.
Like all other trash Netflix series, this will be forgotten about in a week as it continues its ratings slide. Meanwhile Graham will fade into obscurity having swindled people out of their money from book sales. Left as nothing but an irrelevant footnote in history, just another pseudoscientific crackpot.
based
i’m super excited to see Graham’s brilliance brought to a wider audience!
Netflix's popular new series Ancient Apocalypse has been criticised by experts on Pacific history who say it is founded on "racist" and "white supremacist" ideologies and promotes pseudoscience. ABC News
Hancock tells lies and nothing more.
The music for this series is absolutely terrible! Honestly the worst! It’s embarrassing, and I imagine that it’s been put together by a 15 year old with a cracked copy of Abelton. Cliche after cliche. 🤦🏻♂️ Such a shame! As this series has potential ,and would have translated so much better if they’d used an actual composer with style and taste!
"I'm not a scientist or a archeologist" So, let me get this straight, you made research based on things that aren't your area of expertise and are surprised that actual scientists aren't found of your ideias?
Yeah, no shit. If someone that isn't a dentist came and said "brushing your teeth is actually bad" people would rightfully not take that seriously.
He discusses everything with experts in every episode
I'm on episode 1. Halfway through. The content is awesome but it's WAY overtaken by the typical loud music, jolting sound effects, and weird bouncing camera angles and cheesy effects.
You guys can't actually believe this
You say there are no giants or you don't believe in giants. We Muslims mentioned in our Quran that there were giants from the people of Ad and they lived in a city called Aram. They were tough, gigantic, with a well-developed knowledge of building, conquering the world, and constructing buildings that were not followed at that time. But because of their violence and killing, God punished them and they disappeared from existence. You can check what I'm saying. Everything that reminds you of your series is in the Qur’an. Unfortunately, the West does not want to admit that the Koran is true. Even the name of the cave in Malta is an Arabic name. Dark cave. If you want to verify what I am saying, you can ask any Muslim child who are the people of Ad and what are their characteristics
Immanuel Velikovsky wrote extensively about catastrophic events that occurred in ancient history and before.
His book Worlds in Collision is the place to start, then the geological evidence in his Earth in Upheaval.
Didn't some NBA player get canceled for claiming an alternate history exists? Why is it then ok to promote one wherein African acheivements are the work of Aliens. Seems so bizarre to me but you know what... it's 2022 :P
I'm glad Netflix decided to put this out. It never made sense to me that anatomically modern humans have existed for 200,000 years but organized into civilizations only 6,000 years ago. As humans we naturally gravitate toward order and structure, you'll even see 9 month old babies already organizing things, and 2 year olds trying to stack things and build a structure. My honest guess is that civilization as a whole is at MOST a few tens of thousands of years old, but due to various reasons has collapsed and restarted multiple times. I'm also willing to bet there are amazing structures under all that sand in the Sahara dating back to when it was a lush grass land.
Climate change, famine, war, catastrophic events, etc. could be reasons why civilization keeps collapsing, coming back a bit smarter than before.
You being stupid doesn't mean magic people existed in the past lmao
I am a huge fan of Graham and could listen to him for ours but i couldn't watch 5 minutes of this. The edit was unbearable, swoosh noises the dramatic music EVERY second. It feels like it was edited in the early 2000s by someone ADHD for cable TV. This could have been amazing but was made to feel like some cheesy trash history Channel ancient aliens tv show. Which is such a shame because his and randalls work is literally game changing. They should have let him talk full sentences and not treat the audience like idiots. Get rid of the constant noise and pace it like a real documentary.Genuinely disappointed.
He says, "I am no more a pseudo scientist than a dolphin is a pseudo fish." Hilarious since a dolphin is NOT a fish it is a mammal which you could call it a pseudo fish; so he is literally saying he IS a pseudo scientist! ROTFLMAO
Taxonomically speaking, dolphins are fish. We've known this since like the 19th century lmao.
Oh yes !!!!! yeah !!!!!
If Netflix makes another piece of garbage like this, I will cancel my subscription.
Cannot wait for Season 2 or Series 2 - Netflix do not bow under pressure, this is one of your best documentries - listening to Rachel Corp and MSA is fine, but there should be zero pressure to cancel or not air a second season - “Some people are so weak that they think criticizing others will make them strong.” ― Ojingiri Hannah
As long as they put a subtitle "this is pure fiction, nothing of what is said in this pseudo documentary has anything to do with science"
@@thisch666 why so salty? because nobody proofed that he is wrong?
@@RustingPeace LOL.. I can pretend that the pyramids were created by giant pink hippopotamuses wearing ski goggles who disappeared from earth without leaving any trace. Prove me wrong ! The burden of the proof is on his side, and he has absolutely not the slightest evidence to support his theory
@@RustingPeace That's not how science works. You can't prove a negative. The burden is on him to provide evidence for his absurd, white supremacist 'theories'. But he can't, because there is none. Not any. Scientists, on the other hand, have plenty of evidence for their theories. This is just quackerie with some racism added in for good measure.
@@dipperdog Simply asserting that there's no evidence for something doesn't make the evidence suddenly vanish. Also, if you actually watched the show you'd know that Hancock thinks the original civilisation was based in the tropics, and thus was almost certainly non-white.
Such a shame that the series is flooded with over the top dramatization and weird action sound effects every 0.001 seconds, couldn't get through the first episode. It breaks my heart as the topic is my favorite in the world, but it's just simply too much..
Get absolutely dunked on.
This guys a charlatan.
Absolutely LOVE this show!!! It was so fascinating, I highly recommend!
If you like fiction then enjoy it. Aside from this it is pure, 100% crap
@@thisch666 and I'm sure that opinion is based on your impressive credentials and vast amount of research on the subject.
@@charlesncharge6298 It is indeed. At least I am a scientist, not a journalist like this guy. My explanation is that these monuments were brought by giant pink hippopotamus wearing ski goggles and living in underground tunnels on Mars. And I can provide as much evidence to support my theory as this guy provides for his "theory", meaning zero
@@thisch666 like UFOs, it's crap until you see it for yourself. Evidence has been shown, it's either space nazi's from Admiral Bird, or they are playing with us OR it is like in the first Assassins Creed games, the first humans went extinct and planted a seed in other creatures in hope to rebuilt the species .. or they went far far away from earth, a different solar system.. everything is fiction until proven otherwise, gotta love star trek 🤡
@@charlesncharge6298 [Spoiler, it isn't]
Season 2: Graham Hancock leads a rag-tag team of heterodox scientists, engineers and adventurers on a mission to find the lost city of Atlantis using a billion dollar mega-submarine funded by benefactor Elon Musk.
Archelogists attacked the episodes and Netflix supressed it.
These dogmatists are replacing the Church of Middle Ages,
Good, it's full of lies
@@satireofcircumstance6458 Archeologists who did research on Egypt are full of shit. This country in modern society is described as the core of ancient history. Whatever new things are discovered they are afraid of taking away reputation, fame and money from them. Many people are complaining it is almost impossible to do research there because of it. You can google it easily
I don't know anything about zoology, biology, geology, geography, marine biology, cryptozoology, evolutionary theory, evolutionary biology, meteorology, limnology, history, herpetology, paleontology or archeology, but I think... what if the dinosaur got in the lake?
Graham is a absolute legend and a national treasure. Thanks for all the hard work over the DECADES. Good job
@Robo_tripp’n’_420 Nah not really
Poor little ret@rd baby buying books from a man who can't even form a coherent argument.
Bitte Untertitel auf deutsch