Paramotor or Ultralight - Which one do I prefer now?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 862

  • @flyingkub
    @flyingkub 4 ปีที่แล้ว +246

    People always think you have to like one more than another, I fly or have flown: Sail planes, hang gliders, foot launch powered hang gliders, paragliders, paramotors, light aircraft, 3 axis microlight and helicopters. My answer is simple “The one I am flying at the time”.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      I do like that one Algy. I like it.

    • @Make_Boxing_Great_Again
      @Make_Boxing_Great_Again 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      You are basically saying that you change your mind every time you fly an aircraft. Pilots should be decisive and not prone to frequently changing their mind.

    • @peteturner4535
      @peteturner4535 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 I'm only 6 hrs in but fly trike and foot launch.

    • @MrGoMario
      @MrGoMario 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@Make_Boxing_Great_Again You said he said that... Hmmm... I say he did not say that. What now?

    • @Make_Boxing_Great_Again
      @Make_Boxing_Great_Again 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      MrGoMario If I stated something controversial then further substantiations may be useful. However, I’m not, your being flippant, and facts are facts. My point is that pilots should be decisive. If you think that pilots should be confused and prone to changing their mind frequently then feel free to state your case. If you new favourite aircraft is the one that you just jumped in, by definition you have changed your mind from the last different aircraft you were in. Debating you is like playing chess with a pigeon, they shit all over the board knock over the pieces and then declare victory. Try again kid.

  • @alienlatino2945
    @alienlatino2945 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Finally, a British video I can actually understand the English. I want to get into this hobby when I retire 10 years from now, it looks even more fun than my motorcycle!

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I'm glad you can understand my video, I do try and make them easy to follow. I think a lot will have changed in 10 years, paragliding and paramotoring has changed a lot in the decade that I have been flying. I was always advised, never wait till retirement, as life takes over. If you really want to do something, throw your heart and passion into it. I actually sold my motorcycle to buy my PeaBee flexwing ultralight, best decision ever.

    • @alienlatino2945
      @alienlatino2945 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 Now I'm having second thoughts. Paragliding is dangerous. I just saw a video here on TH-cam where a guy's parachute (exactly like the ones used by paragliders) flips in mid-air and he comes head down on his own parachute and it tangles up. He was lucky he had a back-up parachute which almost didn't deploy because it got tangled with the 1st chute. No thanks man.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@alienlatino2945 aviation is dangerous, that's no lie, but, and here is the but, if you train well and understand the environment your are in, it can be as as you make it. Unfortunately TH-cam seems to like showing all the extreme events.

    • @rosshorton9182
      @rosshorton9182 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@alienlatino2945 I've been curious too. If it settles your nerves any, I read this in an article examining paramotoring: "...Research estimates that the activity is slightly safer (per event) than riding motorcycles and more dangerous than riding in cars...".
      If you're already a biker, you're probably more at risk than someone paramotoring. I probably still won't ever do it, but I'd be more likely to try it than the odds of me getting back on a bike again.

    • @alienlatino2945
      @alienlatino2945 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rosshorton9182 Now I'm having my doubts. These things can flip over like a kyte in mid-air and if it does you have to be a real expert to control the apparatus and survive the deadly crash.

  • @skyclimberfan4744
    @skyclimberfan4744 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    As a retired hang glider pilot you are making me so envious. The paramotor has the advantage of quick setup and go, the hang glider is fantastic but the setup needs time and a runway of sorts. In the end for me there is nothing like a solid structure over me. If you can manage the cost, having both would be the perfect world. Thanks.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I always looked up the hang glider guys, just zooming up and down the ridges, while I was gale hanging in my paraglider. This a bit of a dream for me. I saved a lot so having both is a gift.

    • @seattleflyboard3807
      @seattleflyboard3807 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hence my idea for a paraglider with inflatable segments that keep it from losing shape in turbulence....like a kiteboarding wing.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@seattleflyboard3807 this has been looked and tried and actually made the wings not recover very well.

  • @fastfreddy19641
    @fastfreddy19641 4 ปีที่แล้ว +83

    Just had my first paramotor lesson yesterday and I'm bloody nackered but looking forward to getting in the air. Great video.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      You'll never look back. It's an amazing sport.

    • @BBL_Drizzy91
      @BBL_Drizzy91 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Whats nackered?

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      He's tired, (knackered)

    • @zadokmotorfreight2423
      @zadokmotorfreight2423 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 ......or "missed the landing" Lol!!

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@zadokmotorfreight2423 I'm not sure of the context.. missed the landing??

  • @mark675
    @mark675 4 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    Id choose the peabee almost every time, but I still love my paramotor and they are alot easier to just setup and fly from smaller fields being foot launched, you've got the right idea having both! 😂

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Lots of saving but yes I feel very lucky.

  • @bravobravoh1344
    @bravobravoh1344 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Beautiful scenery, it seems like you can experience it a lot better with one of those.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  ปีที่แล้ว

      It's a wonderful area to fly and the unrestricted view on both aircraft makes it even better.

  • @spacecowboy07723
    @spacecowboy07723 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Keen to get into the sport thanks for the info

  • @comeflywithlee433
    @comeflywithlee433 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    An interesting video on a form of aviation that I know very little about. Thanks.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Lee, that's quite a common response. Paramotors share the skies with everyone and launch from small undefined locations. The Sub70 Flexwings have quite literally taken over my flying. The joy of Sub70 is no licence required.

  • @banalpedant41
    @banalpedant41 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    For me [40 yr hang glider pilot who has flown in lots of heavy turbulence], the question being asked is would you prefer a collapsible wing instead of a fixed-wing ultralight.
    Two Cdns both who were legends within the hang gliding world lost their lives due to thinking they could fly their paragliders in similar air to their hang gliders.
    We talking about folks that used to land downwind uphill in hang gliders. true masters of the sport. [not that is a qualifier but these guys knew the air they were flying in]
    Btw Willie and Chris Mueller in case anybody is wondering.
    Basically, you never know when you can hit air that will collapse your wing in a paraglider and if you care to fly in rough air you are at a much higher risk.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hi Banal, thank you for your in-depth comment. This video is a few years old now and my experience has changed. I now teach Flexwing pilots and enjoy the safety of a more stable wing. I hope you find more interesting videos in my content collection.

  • @GreaseMonkeyAuto
    @GreaseMonkeyAuto 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think the thing that stands out the most, is the beauty of it all.
    Plus I love the sound of a happy 2stroke

    • @GreaseMonkeyAuto
      @GreaseMonkeyAuto 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You're totally living my dream dude.
      I'm glad you feel lucky.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hello Daniel, thank you for your kind words. It's been a long time coming and a lot of hard work but I'm making the most of every day.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can beat a happy 2 stroke engine.

  • @soulstorm8806
    @soulstorm8806 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent way to scope out an area if you are attempting to learn a new area for understanding roads etc.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Soul Storm, what is an excellent way to scope things out? I'm not sure what you mean.

  • @Michael112233able
    @Michael112233able 4 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    Great video, I enjoyed it! I have nearly 30 years of flying virtually everything and my conclusion is that I have enjoyed them all for very different reasons and ultimately there is no one answer for everyone as people’s flight situations are all very different. For me, the paramotor wins out over my trike flying simply because of the simplicity of set up and the ability to transport so easily in my car. But if I lived on a ranch or had access to a very cheap hanger nearby I would go for the quicksilver ultralight as this is the least restrictive in terms of flying safely in a wide verity of conditions. Buuuuut, still nothing like driving to the beach on a light wind day and motoring down the coast. Like you, I have had free flight HG and FF Paragliders on comparison (bywingwal) and finally the paraglider won out due to ease of use and transportability even though the HG was a superior machine as far as performance. I have also had HG trikes at the same time as Paramotors and the paramotor wins out, again, for its transportability, easy storage, simplicity and for its unmatched flight views! The paramotor is not the perfect flight solution but it is awfully sweet when the conditions are right and you have the time to wait for it to be right (parawaiting). One thing is for sure is that you should DEFINITELY FLY SOMETHING! Personally, I don’t regret a dime spent on flight over the years, theirs simply nothing like being in the air no mater what is holding you up.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Wow, thank you for taking the time to write that reply. I COMPLETELY AGREE. I just love being in the air, I'm like a kid in a sweet shop when I have flown. I've sold and traded so many things over the decades to allow my flying to keep going. Like you I wish I had the big wide open space to just keep it rigged and can walk out and just go flying.

    • @alexrands2580
      @alexrands2580 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Parawaiting 😂😂😂

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@alexrands2580 spent many an afternoon just waiting for the conditions to be right to fly.

    • @seattleflyboard3807
      @seattleflyboard3807 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yes...its the portability that makes Paramotors so attractive. Closest I've seen is the Doodlebug harness for hang gliders. I wish they could come up with something a little more portable

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The problem is getting a Ridge structure and portability is not always easy. I do like my Peabee as it can be rigged in 20 minutes or from a trailer and the wing in the bag, in under 50 minutes. That's pretty fast in my book.

  • @d911tru4
    @d911tru4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video. I agree. My personal experience: In a trike had 2 near crashes due to sudden wind coming up and no where to land. Had one crash, trike was a writeoff, some scatches lucky nothing serious. Was due to turbulence near the ground, lifting and falling the trike unexpectedly. So wind made me change my mind - I prefer a para now. Anything that can handle some wind. I have also seen some army guys doing loops and stunts in very strong winds with parachutes.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi D911, thank you for your story and I hope you are ok. I'm glad you agree as some seem to have misinterpreted the intent of my video. Keep flying safe.

  • @TruthHurts2u
    @TruthHurts2u 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i would love to see a revisit to this video now that you have more experience in the PB. Especially your confidence in flying the two in various wind conditions and crosswind landing in the PB.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hi TruthHurts, I have thought about making a follow up video, but it would probably be a little one sided. I sold my paramotor a few months after making this as it just wasn't being used. The PeaBee has just transformed my flying and I literally never looked back. I hope you enjoyed this video and any of the other content.

    • @TruthHurts2u
      @TruthHurts2u 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 I've been binge watching. You're quickly swaying me to sell my paramotor and join PB club. That's why I'm looking for all the info I can get. I would really love to see a video explaining the difference between the PB, Bivvybee and the Adam. I just can't see the difference between them all.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TruthHurts2u in quick terms, to the Bivvubee is SSDR so needs a NPPL licence to fly it. The Peabee 2 and the Adam are practically the same except the Adam has retractable landing gear and are both Sub70 but by sticking a G reg on them can also be microlights. I hope that helps.

    • @TruthHurts2u
      @TruthHurts2u 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 It does thank you and I'm still binge watching and learning lots about it. It seems like a UK regulations thing. Here in the US we don't have sub70 we have part 103 regulations governing unlicensed ultralight aircraft. Looking at the specs it looks like all three are classed as part 103 aircraft in the USA and can be flown without a license. Except maybe the fuel capacity might be an issue but that's easy enough to solve.
      In the USA the regs are fairly easy. Part 103 says:
      If unpowered, weighs less than 155 pounds (70 Kg); or If powered:
      (1) Weighs less than 254 pounds (115 Kg) empty weight, excluding floats and safety devices;
      (2) Has a fuel capacity not exceeding 5 U.S. gallons (19L );
      (3) Is not capable of more than 55 knots (63 mph) calibrated airspeed at full power in level flight; and
      (4) Has a power-off stall speed which does not exceed 24 knots (28 mph) calibrated airspeed.
      Love your videos. Wish you were here closer to me so I could take some training because I can't find any training for trikes in Southern California within 250 miles of me.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TruthHurts2u I should be at Sun and Fun this year. There is a Flylight dealership in America now, Blue Collar Aviation.

  • @Driftseen
    @Driftseen 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I have paramotor and I fly hang glider too( not motorized yet) but I would say paramotors are much slower and less efficient because of less aspect ratio of the wing, also they are prone to collapse in some bad weather conditions ( windy or wet sail close to clouds ), also they dont have much of life time to them so u need to buy a new paramotor wing every 250 hours or so since there is more stress on the sail flying faster than paragliders so if u add up the cost of the wings that u need to buy over time, it makes paramotoring much more expensive than trikes or foot launch motorized hang gliders
    Hang gliders have much larger aspect ratio and tend to be more efficient and because you dont need to use engine on higher RPM most of the time, the engine will last longer and will cost less overall to operate..
    If you use let say a mosquito harness combined with a double surface more efficient hang glider like willswing sport 3 , you will have up to 60 mph speed as well as capability to soar like any none motorized hang glider and stay in air for many hours with out even needing to use the engine at all except for take off and that can effect on the fuel use and engine hours and cost almost nothing to operate... and more importantly that the hang glider wing like willswing sport 3 will last u 2 decades of fun not 250 hours like paramotor wings.
    I fly paramotor and it's not like I say paramotors are bad or anything like that but I am very positive about capabilities of hang gliders and efficiency and their higher speeds, so for people whom wants to know which one is better, I would say, if u dont have a storage space for hang glider or a tike , you simply dont have any option than going with paramotors but if you have some place to keep your equipment that is large enough to house a hang glider or trike, I would say definitely go with hang gliders and I mean not even the trike version but the foot launch mosquito harness that you can soar like an eagle for hours without worrying about the fuel at all, willswing sport 3 170 will be that eagle...
    The very beginner hang glider wings have more aspect ratio than top end D class paragliding wings and that will give you idea about the efficiency of hang gliders.. the lowest aspect ratio on hang gliders can not be less than 4.6 but the top end paramotor wing will never exceed even 4.5 ( u need to consider the projected aspect ratio not flat aspect ratio of a paramotor wing )
    Willswing sport 3 has aspect ratio of 6.6 and that means it's almost 1.5 times more efficient than the best paraglider XC wing .. that's the meaning for engine RPM and fuel use and cost of maintenance of engine.. and that's why mosquito harness with 14 hp can lift an elephant with hang gliders but 14 hp paramotor can not lift even a mosquito...
    U will feel much more in control on hang gliders than any known paramotor wing and the reason is the pitch control... what I mean is in hang glider u will have %100 capability of pitch control but in paraglider and paramotor wings that doesn't exist,, the trim setting is not actual pitch control simply because u can not control them every single second and you can not go to negative pitch angle at all unlike hang glider wings that actually you can make negative pitch on the wing meaning you can go up or down at any moment on your wish..that means if you get in to massive thermals with paramotors, most definitely your pants will be different colors but in hang gliders it much more controllable and less worry..
    Hang gliders are much more true flying machine than any paramotor or paragliding wings.. you are in control 360 on any direction including up and down but in paramotor wings you are not in controlling of going up and down except using your engine to help u go up and coming down is almost not %100 on your control..
    I truly feel much more safe when flying my hang glider than flying my paramotor or paraglider or even my speed wing.. I feel absolutely in control and I have zero worry and every single second of it is a pleasure...
    I can dive down 65mph and instantly pitch it up to go up like a rocket without worrying about any wing collapse like paramotor wing.. i had 4 times wing collapse on my paraglider wing in past and i know how shitty it can be.. but i can dive down with my hang glider and an inch from the ground i can pull up and go up with hundreds of feet per minute.. there is no way in the world you can do that with any paragliding or paramotoring wing at all.. if u want live longer I suggest being more cautious about type of equipments u fly with..

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Everything you have said is valid but I don't fly hang gliders and the wings you are talking about out outside the scope of the Sub 70 exemption which I am flying under. I'm comparing 2 powered machines which I own and fly and the video is about which one I prefer. As I've said in the video is almost everything you are saying. Paramotors are slower but I can go Paracamping etc and fly for a much longer time as I can carry more fuel. I didn't want a mosquito as I didn't want foot launched, I wanted a Sub70 trike. Everything you said it true but I don't want to fly a hang glider, I want to fly a flexwing trike. I don't what conditions you have flown you paramotor in but I can honestly say I love it and fly it all day long, all year round, had a few wing flutters but nothing that I would say would scare me. Thank you for the lengthy comment but it does not relate to what I am flying and I like flying both. Horses for courses.

    • @Driftseen
      @Driftseen 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What I mean is using hang glider wing mixed with mosqito harness will be more closer comparison of 2 different machine than trying to compare a trike to foot launch paraglider unless the paraglider is on trike set up too..
      But very good video. I enjoyed watching it.. more informative than many other videos..

    • @Driftseen
      @Driftseen 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I forgot to say I live in USA and we have FAA regulation called
      103 legal a bit different than Europeans.
      We can go up to 254lbs and 5 gallon fuel + up to 63 mph speed and stall speed no more than 27.6 mph with full take off weight with 170 lbs pilot weight so if pilot is heavier, it means the stall speed can be even higher, but it has to be less than 27.6 mph with 170 lbs pilot weight..

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Driftseen thank you. I always like the Mosquitos, Ben Ashman is a very creative designer. The question I kept getting asked, most from those that know me, is which one do I prefer. You are right, they are different machines, but that why I like them. I used the PeaBee when I just want hassle free flying and the paramotor when I can't fly PeaBee. It's just nice to have both I suppose. I moved away from freeflight because I hated having to lug the kit up a hill. Now I just pitch up and fly. I just love flying.

    • @Driftseen
      @Driftseen 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Willswing sport 3 170 weights 65lbs + 4.9 lbs lara gold 250 parachute capable of 350 lbs +58 lbs electric star mosquito harness + 7.5 lbs of fuel ( 1.25 gallon) + 2 lbs camera + 2.6 lbs wheels + 6 lbs food and water = 140lbs total or 63.63 kg much less than 70 kg and can do 55mph no problem at all ( easy ) .. it will cost $7600 for full top and bottom mylar sail wing
      $970 for lara gold 250 reserve
      $6900 mosquito harness+ $1000 very good vari+ $500 very good helmet + $140 very good electric gloves+ $850 very good 360 camera + $40 water container =total around $17000 but will be able to soar almost any weather and burn almost no fuel once u are above 3000 feet using thermals and can fly faster also no restrictions on where u need to take off or land unlike what needed for trikes...
      Sport 3 170 flys like an eagle with no engine @ hook-in weight of 275 pounds other than the weight of the wing itself . It means even if u weight 200lbs , it will still be able to soar with mosqito harness and all the gears above..
      I fly sport 3 155 at 218 lbs with no problem 3 lbs over the weight.. it's the beast that wants to fly any day .. sport 3 170 can lift way more than even 275lbs hook in weight soaring

  • @clsmith1126
    @clsmith1126 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excellent video Sir. Beautiful scenery. Clear audio. Great presentation. 👍

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad you enjoyed it, welcome to the channel. There are a few other flying videos in my content area if you are interested.

  • @AndreBandarra1
    @AndreBandarra1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Interesting hearing your thoughts on both, Cheers Giles!

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yay, Andre is here. Don't worry I'm still following your antics.

  • @peter6782
    @peter6782 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    has it ever been considered to try and fit a dampener to the front wheel to help with landings it would help stop the front wheel from snatching same principle to the steering on a motor cycle ?

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I do know what you mean by the damper, but not had the need or the weight penalty. The geometry is pretty good and I've not had it snatched round at all. If it can override my foot pressure, the wheel would be the issue. Thanks for watching.

  • @CactusJackSlade
    @CactusJackSlade 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    From a youtube lurker who flew hang gliders 35 years ago this was very informative and fun to watch - thank you 🙂

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi CactusJackSlade, I'm assuming it's Jack, but welcome to the comments, everyone is welcome here. I'm glad you found it informative, I do try. Lots has happened since that video. Additionally, as I mostly fly flexwing aircraft no, I wished I'd tried hang gliding, I follow a few HG channels as it just looks amazing.

  • @rich_vincent
    @rich_vincent 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Great comparison and actually surprised that the paramotor would be your choice in rougher conditions. That's helped concrete more confidence in my paramotor, cheers :)

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Rich, any more videos coming out?

    • @rich_vincent
      @rich_vincent 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 got a short one coming soon :)

    • @seattleflyboard3807
      @seattleflyboard3807 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A paramotor in rough conditions is very dangerous unless you are an expert. Those lines go slack in turbulence easily and can snag on the cage.

  • @phmiii
    @phmiii 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for your insight. I am a newbie and I do not know where to start.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The first rule is don't buy ANYTHING until you have completed any form of training. Any good school will have kit for you to use and learn on.

    • @phmiii
      @phmiii 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 Thank you, I will do that!

  • @Insanabiliter_In_Linea
    @Insanabiliter_In_Linea ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've been interested in flight since I was a kid, particularly fascinated with paramotors and powered hang gliders/ultralights so I've gotta say, mad jelly dawg, mad jelly. That countryside looks absolutely stunning from above.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hi Nunya, welcome to the channel. The dream of flight is there for us all and your comment was so true for me. I've always dreamed of flying and spent most of my life focused towards achieving it. I hope you like the channel as there is probably lots of videos that you'd enjoy.

  • @vincesnetterton5868
    @vincesnetterton5868 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    both are great. one is much safer

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The thing to remember is that Aviation is a risky pastime. If you come in with the perception that its all safe and roses, you will get caught out. Flying only in butter smooth air, both are safe. I have had collapses on the PPG side but they are all manageable and presented no risks. It all depends what you want form the sport/ hobby.

  • @shanesplanetshane3795
    @shanesplanetshane3795 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Overall cost and fitting the plane in the back seat of a small honda civic, made my choice clear. Thanks for the vid, both look like a blast!

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hi Shane, they are definitely both a blast. I ended up selling my Paramotor😧.

  • @cariza5
    @cariza5 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Are the frequencies of 129.825 and 129.8333 used Solely for Microlights in the UK, if so, those frequencies are very close to each other.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello, I see you have asked this question on another video. The only microlight frequency I know of is the new 8.33Khz spacing and that is 129.835, it used to be 129.825 on the old 25Khz spacing which is no longer in used. I hope that helps.

    • @cariza5
      @cariza5 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 so on my Scanner should I just input 129.825

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      129.835. Everyone is now in 8.33 spacing. www.bmaa.org/news/bmaa-news/new-microlight-radio-frequency

  • @SfantuSS
    @SfantuSS 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Witch is safer ? The Paraglider or the Hang Glider in your opinion ?

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Unfortunately I've never flown a hang glider so I can't comment. Sorry.

  • @andrewlarking7492
    @andrewlarking7492 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video, I’m keen to try Paramotoring and exploring on TH-cam. That landing was smooth.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hi Andrew, thanks for having a look at my channel. It was a lovely day so the landing was not too difficult. I hope you find more useful videos on my content list.

  • @101m4n
    @101m4n 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Just started my training up at flyschool uk. Been eyeing this sport up for years, I look forward to getting in the air! (when the damn weather improves)

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      FlySchool or Skyschool? Flying is so addictive, I keep coming back for more.

    • @101m4n
      @101m4n 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 Oh, skyschool of course. I've miss-typed that more than a few times now.
      I managed to get in an afternoon of ground handling last Friday in before the weather went bad. As/Ds came naturally, so did forward handling, but my reverse needs work. I'll get there eventually!
      How long have you been flying?

  • @jasonsmith6508
    @jasonsmith6508 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent video thank you 👍

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Jason, glad it was helpful.

  • @standardaussie
    @standardaussie ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thought about paragliding for a while, but after thinking about it I realised the only exposure to the sport i ever have had was a dude dropping out the sky just out of town here while I was out the lakes getting in some 4x4 fun. Sucks when something is marred by negativity.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Standard Aussie, Avaition has its risks but once you have flown and gain knowledge you can mitigate a significant number of the risks but knowing about weather, advanced wing control etc. I hope you get to experience some form of aviation as its a wonderful way to experience life.

  • @wkboggs5
    @wkboggs5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Found you on Short Field link.
    Nice video.
    PPC pilot in Ky, US.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Wkboggs5, thanks for joining me over on my channel. I know it's a different flavour but as a PPC pilot I'm sure you will appreciate the lighter w d of flying.

  • @DavidAlsh
    @DavidAlsh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I would love to see how you set up for camping, how you plan your landing site. ETA on that video?

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello David, is that for the Paramotor or the PeaBee?

    • @DavidAlsh
      @DavidAlsh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 either honestly. Whatever you think is better for it

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I made a few videos on my Icarus X kit and vlogged the event if that helps.

  • @BariFPV
    @BariFPV 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I fly paragliders and now I'm working towards getting Hang 2 rating for Hang Gliding :) as you said both crafts are different, in my novice opinion the pitch authority of a hang glider compared to a paraglider is what I like about hang gliding the most so far. Much to learn :)

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I hope your Hang glider training goes well.

    • @BariFPV
      @BariFPV 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey thanks, so far so good. Yesterday I did my third lesson and went up to 75 feet on tow :)

    • @donzioldbuddy
      @donzioldbuddy ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I fly both and appreciate the hang glider’s stability in rough air

  • @Ravidow
    @Ravidow 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hi there! I love your TH-cam channel!! How costly is the trike with wheels that you fly. I want to buy one ASAP!!! THANK YOU FOR SHARING AND MAKING MY DAYS!!!!!!!

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The PeaBee is about £11k ready to go. When you think a paramotor is around 6.5k and wing is 4k, they are actually not that expensive for what you get. I hope that helps.

  • @ukjjs1
    @ukjjs1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video, this is something I'm considering

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      HI Jason, which one, flexwing or the paramotor?

    • @ukjjs1
      @ukjjs1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 sorry, paramotor

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ukjjs1 I really enjoyed my paramotoring but just didn't have the time to do both.

  • @bpnsirdiealot
    @bpnsirdiealot ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How well does the second one work when you want to take photographs. As a photographer that is what would interest me more in the second one.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have definitely found the PeaBee Flexwing easier as there is nothing in my hand so can support the camera more easily. However there is more structural bits in the way. I've taken some lovely photos from the PeaBee though, you'll notice in the later content.

    • @bpnsirdiealot
      @bpnsirdiealot ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 Thank you.

  • @brianballard1729
    @brianballard1729 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Lovely and congratulations on an effective demo and your advice...

  • @FreshTillDeath56
    @FreshTillDeath56 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    As someone who was locked in on paramotoring since day 1, this is a nice change of view. That PB looks like a nifty little craft. I can't wait to be a PPG pilot myself ! :)

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I flew paramotors and paragliders for over a decade, the PeaBee ticks so many boxes for me. I just didn't have the time for both so one had to go, it was very sad.

    • @FreshTillDeath56
      @FreshTillDeath56 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Good call. I live above the Washington DC permanent flight restriction in the less congested area, so PPG is the logical choice for me. I've already found an instructor and friends!

  • @ikay2102
    @ikay2102 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I fly paramotor and Autogyro MTO, I could say the same sir, it's great to fly both

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello there, I'm glad you can relate.

  • @diggy-d8w
    @diggy-d8w 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I'm confused about different trikes..... one has a hang glider fixed wing w/ a control bar & others like you're using has the parachute
    type of control. I apologize for incorrect terms for the different aircraft but IF I put a Hang Glider wing on a trike and follow all the
    other rules of Pt 103 can I fly it as a Pt 103 aircraft? So I guess yours is a ParaMotor & the other's a Powered Hang Glider? Once
    I learn the proper terms for them I really want to know id a Hang Glider wing can be a Pt 103 aircraft if all rules are followed?
    I old but want to fly before I can't...... lol, thanks for the video. peace

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I read you comment a few times but you are correct. There are some good flying schools in the US so if you contact them, they will be able to advise you. This company might be able to help. www.flylighttrikesus.com/

  • @joseguillermomorenozarate8622
    @joseguillermomorenozarate8622 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Cuanto tiempo de vuelo aguanta ese paramotor

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Jose, Todo depende de la cantidad de combustible que puedas llevar. Motor quema unos 4 litros y hora. El vuelo más largo que he tenido fue de 5 horas y 30 minutos, pero podría haber volado otras 3 horas. Espero que eso ayude.

    • @joseguillermomorenozarate8622
      @joseguillermomorenozarate8622 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Gracias

  • @brentsmith5647
    @brentsmith5647 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliant video thank you 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

  • @Toys4Life
    @Toys4Life 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Loved the video sir! Thank you for sharing your well articulated thoughts!

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's been a while since this video came out and thank you for your kind words.

  • @radarwilliams37
    @radarwilliams37 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks I was about to waste my money on buying a PeaBee, now I will look at Paramotoring. I wanted to do powered flight and I thought the PeaBee would be safer in rougher air. Great review. Cheers

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If you want to fly, both are fun, and actually cost the same. It would never be wasted money if you are having fun. It all depends on what type of flying you want to do.

    • @TheOffCycle
      @TheOffCycle 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Paramotoring is safer and has all the advantages as far as portability, setup and flying sites. Id compare it like kiteboarding vs windsurfing.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TheOffCycle in my current position I would have to disagree. As I mention in the video, they are 2 different activities and the PeaBee is significantly safer ( it can't collapse). It's only my opinion though and everyone is entitled to theirs. Safe Skies.

    • @TheOffCycle
      @TheOffCycle 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 if the peabee suffers any type of structural failure you are in a reserve situation. Modern paragliders, especially A rated wings re-inflate with zero pilot input. They also do this quite fast and intentional collapsing and stalling is part of acro flying so i would not really associate “collapse” with paramotoring not being safe. Maybe 15-20yrs ago. A paraglider collapse is more likely than and peabee structural failure but that collapse turning into a reserve toss or dangerous situation is of low probability. If your peabee has a failure you are in a reserve situation almost guaranteed. Just speaking in terms of normal pleasure flying... not acro.

    • @TheOffCycle
      @TheOffCycle 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 oh and another pro for PPG is the ability to free-fly if you have a dual rated wing. I do hike and fly with my dog on my PPG wing!!

  • @jflow5601
    @jflow5601 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks. Very informative video.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you. It's a year round now, so I feel an update is required.

    • @jflow5601
      @jflow5601 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 You Brits are usually quite thorough.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I do try J Flow 😁

  • @walter.bellini
    @walter.bellini 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video thank you for taking us for a nice air ride!

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Flying is the best. They never said I had to grow up. I'm glad you enjoyed it.

  • @gpunktespunkt2910
    @gpunktespunkt2910 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ich habe vor ein paar Jahren Paramotorschein gemacht, möchte aber gerne auf das Ultralight-Trike umsteigen.
    Bei uns ist recht viel Wind und mit Paramotor kann man nur sehr früh, sehr spät oder mit langen Anfahrtswegen, weiter ins Binnenland, fliegen.
    Mit dem UL-Trike denke ich, ist man etwas unabhängiger vom Wind.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      In den letzten 4 Jahren bin ich wirklich viel mehr mit einem Flexwing (Ultralight) geflogen, als ich es mit einem Motorschirm geschafft hätte. Mit dem PeaBee bin ich weniger vom Wind abhängig, da ich landen und starten kann. Ich bin mit 9 Meilen pro Stunde Seitenwind gelandet. Ich hoffe, das hilft. Ich hoffe, dass der Google-Übersetzer seine Arbeit gut genug macht.

    • @gpunktespunkt2910
      @gpunktespunkt2910 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 Hallo und vielen Dank, sehr gute Übersetzung. Ich werde meine Augen offen halten und umsteigen.

  • @raian1323
    @raian1323 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    One day im gona buy one of these and fly over these beautiful mountain in my homeland

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Follow your dreams and you'll make it happen.

  • @ChuckyWright
    @ChuckyWright 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    solid comparison, maybe I need to try the other form of flying fun!

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Chucky, you have a lot more flex in your FAR103 to fly slightly heavier machines. Lots of things have changed for me since making tgat video. Stay safe.

  • @KevinArmstrong4154
    @KevinArmstrong4154 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent. Not my style of flight but enjoyed the illustration of both. If you have a microlight licence then different categories beckon; either a two seater with all the bureacracy and permit/check flight hassles, but you can take mates up for a spin, or a sub-300 kilo SSDR. To cater for the latter there's precious little around unless you buy a cheap two eater and blank the back seat off, usually an elderly two stroke.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Kevin, I have neither and the comparison is between the 2 because I kept getting asked which one. I have a lapsed Group A licence but I still actually prefer this deregulated flying. Loved your recent Flying plank video.

  • @old8235
    @old8235 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I had an original paraplane. A little of both. Thnx.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is a paraplane a ram Air parachute on a trike frame?

  • @GodzillaGoesGaga
    @GodzillaGoesGaga 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great review. I’ve always been told that paragliders are more sensitive to thermals and high winds because they can collapse whereas a hang-glider is more tolerant because it moves faster, is more efficient and has structural stability. What are your thoughts ?

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hello Pentachronic, both flying types have pros and cons but as you have mentioned, the ridged structure on the hang glider wing prevents collapsing. Paragliders will give you more feedback of the air than a hang glider but I did enjoy paragliding and paramotoring. I just found an easier way to fly with the Sub70 and now microlight flexwing flying. I hope that kind of gives you a flavour of my thoughts. If you are new to the channel, you'll see I have documented my flexwing/Sub70 journey, if that helps.

  • @seattleflyboard3807
    @seattleflyboard3807 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    objective comparison to anyone thinking of which sport is best for them. I've done both extensively.
    Paragliding is sketchy in any kind of wind unless you have expert skills....ie you kite and fly regularly and have the muscle memory to instantly sort out a misbehaving paraglider. I've never been able to develop enough skill to fly in anything but mellow conditions....and that makes it unsafe as there were many many times I took off in calm conditions but had things pickup before landing. And anytime you go cross country, weather conditions change....which makes cross country in a paramotor. Ultralights are more capable of actually going places. They can handle more wind...so way more flying opportunities. ultralights are faster ....often 200-300% faster so you can go places. Once I took off in my paramotor trike and went 5 miles from the airport. The wind picked up and I barely made it back.....my ground speed on the way back was less than 3mph....if the wind picked up any more I would have been going backwards. Ultralights can have engines such as the Rotax 503....which is going to be massively more reliable than ANY paramotor toy tiny 2 stroke that most have. The Rotax 503 is a work of art.....a Pollini or Thor 2 stroke is a joke by way of comparison.
    So the ultralight is safer, faster, stronger, more reliable, more versatile. I'd say they are equally fun. The main advantage of the paramotor is that they are super compact and portable. And that is the huge advantage. If it was not for that...an ultralight is far superior.
    I

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think you missed the point of my video. I kept getting asked which one do 'I' prefer. I appreciate your lengthy reply though, as that would give someone an external perspective. Thanks for watching and commenting.

  • @Paramoteurpilot
    @Paramoteurpilot 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great landing Giles, brilliant footage with the shadow.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you. I did like that landing shadow, which is why I reused it at the end. more fun and games to come.

  • @justharryjohnson7250
    @justharryjohnson7250 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Looks like this is a question alot of people wanted an answer too great view count. And very informative.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cheers Harry, I hope you are well.

  • @shaneross7428
    @shaneross7428 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really enjoyed that thank you

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello Shane, I'm glad you enjoyed it, it was a special trip for me as well.

  • @DOLINALASVE
    @DOLINALASVE 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Koliko vremena treba za prvi let ?

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello Donlina, Mislite li naučiti letjeti prvim letom ili ga opremiti da uđe u zrak?

    • @DOLINALASVE
      @DOLINALASVE 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 mislio sam koliko vremena treba da bih ja naucio letjeti, dali treba prvo da idem na paraglajding ili mogu odmah da krenem sa paramotorom?

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Za paramotora bih najbolje našao školu. Može potrajati danima ili tjednima, sve do vaše sposobnosti da naučite nove stvari. Nažalost, ne mogu dati točniji odgovor.

    • @DOLINALASVE
      @DOLINALASVE 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 ok hvala na odgovoru sačekat ću proljeće pa krećem na ućenje🍻

  • @AnglerBudgie
    @AnglerBudgie 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nobody thought of some light mesh or even fishing net in the triangle of the bar to prevent bird strikes? I've only seen one such video of a bird strike but surely that would work?

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don't believe that bird strikes are really that much of an issue. I think there would be more of an issue of things getting caught in any kind of mesh while flying.

    • @AnglerBudgie
      @AnglerBudgie 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 yeah I only seen 1 video of a bird strike but surely with the prop right behind you I thought there would be something.. I want to fly soooo bad 😂✈️

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AnglerBudgie dreams do happen, sometimes you need to help them along. I've always dreamwd of flying and now I'm helping others on their journey towards flying.

  • @nur5ey1
    @nur5ey1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    3 years ago already?? Doesn't seem possible Giles..
    Look at the channel now!! 😁👍🏼

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  ปีที่แล้ว

      I know, it's been a bit mental. So much has happened.

  • @robward7873
    @robward7873 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Giles, how does the turn radius compare between the Peabee and a paramotor? I guess the PPG can turn tighter as it flys slower? I fly a C42 and a Foxcub and the landings in a PPG look sooo easy!

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  ปีที่แล้ว

      HI Rob, the ppg will turn much tighter but that's primarily because it is flying slower. Ppg are easy to land with the correct technique but I like my knees.. 😉.

    • @robward7873
      @robward7873 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 😄

    • @robward7873
      @robward7873 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Do you ever get tempted back to PPG world?

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Rob, I flew in recently at a fly-in, a recent video, and was happy just being in the air. However having flown the PeaBee and the distance and comfort I get, against the cost of paramotor frames and wings now, I couldn't justify the cost of going back to PPG. The PeaBee is only slightly more expensive for a lot more aircraft/performance /comfort.

  • @DanielJonesParamotor
    @DanielJonesParamotor 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    You know what Giles, the more I watch your PeaBee videos the more I want one!

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I don't think the bank balance would like it, but they are so much fun.

    • @chrsfrwll
      @chrsfrwll 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Daniel, my problem too

    • @garrykennedy5484
      @garrykennedy5484 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The major thing is,, you don't want to have to transport, set up, break down, store an ultralight. It's really only worth it if you have a property that you can store it assembled in a hanger and launch and land there. With a Paramotor, you can just about launch from anywhere, but the weather conditions dictate the flying days and hours, before and after thermal activity mainly, and there's even much more about a fixed wing vs a rag wing when it comes to the inevitable weird winds that can collapse a rag wing even if you make the best of decisions. I fly Hang Gliders for this reason. I can't have a wing collapse, and I can fly in much more diverse wind/weather conditions safely. However, it's more of a task to store, set up, break down, transport etc. But I WILL live to fly again. The chances of me needing to deploy my reserve chute are next to zero compared what a parawing. Bla bla bla,,,,,,,,, It's up to you,,, just do some real soul searching research as my brother and I did before making up you mind.

    • @roadboat9216
      @roadboat9216 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Garry Kennedy Thanks for the thoughts Gary. So do you think the the fixed wing is more airworthy? No collapse issues. Rotor problems not as critical? This is my main question that this video, although very helpful, didn’t really answer. Can you? Thanks!

  • @JoaoMiguel-lc1qe
    @JoaoMiguel-lc1qe 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The cruise speed (more efficient speed) in the hadron 3 is with trim open, so to be fair the difference in cruise speed is 34mph for paramotor and 40mph for flex wing microlight. Top speed in paramotor a speed bar is needed and it's last safe to.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have a Hadron 3 and completely disagree, the Hadron 3 is not most efficient on fully trimmed out, I made a video to prove it as well. Drag increases at the square of of the speed increase, that's why you have a polar curve. But that's not the point of this video, it's which one do I prefer. Most conventional flexwings (I'm flying a Sub70 ultralight) fly at 55mph and faster, the P&M Quick R fly at 80-90 mph in the cruise. This video is purely about which one do I prefer, and I prefer both.

    • @JoaoMiguel-lc1qe
      @JoaoMiguel-lc1qe 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 Yes I know. I'm sorry i think I not explain myself properly. What Im saying is the cruise speed in hadron 3 is not in trims full slow. Not even with trims in fastest configuration, probably in trim 9 or 10. Ony because you throttle more don't means you aren't in cruise speed if you throttle a bit more but gain significant more speed you are in sweet spot. You talk in cruise speed in trims full slow for me don't make sense because a resistance in the wing is more.

    • @JoaoMiguel-lc1qe
      @JoaoMiguel-lc1qe 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 a quick r can do 90 mph but needed a airport to land. It's like comparing a helicopter to a sport plane. Paramotor can land almost every where. A cri cri can do 200 km/h with 30 hp. But if the motor fail the pilot are dead.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JoaoMiguel-lc1qe But you are missing the point, I am comparing, my Peabee flexwing with my paramotor. Which one do 'I' prefer, and I like both. Its the whole point of the video. I know the limitations of both, but that is the joy of aviation.

  • @SpecialEditionArt
    @SpecialEditionArt 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for the video, could you tell us please, what feels safer?

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I sold my Paramotor a few years ago and now just fly flexwings. I hope that helps answer your question. I hope you enjoyed the video. Load more of my flying journey in the content lists if that helps.

  • @paulb7334
    @paulb7334 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I would like to try the glider I think I would like it better than my paramotor wing

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hello Paul, do you paramotor attm?

    • @paulb7334
      @paulb7334 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 yes

  • @skyedge3407
    @skyedge3407 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I would assume the Ultralight is superior because less chance of the wing collapsing, but of course it is more cumbersome to move around and cant be packed easily on foot like a parachute.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are correct in that the PeaBee won't collapse but having a collapse in a paramotor it perfectly acceptable, 90% of the time they sort themselves out. I just enjoy any form of flying.

    • @davidt6539
      @davidt6539 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 And the other 10%? I'm currently thinking of switching training from paramotor to peabee.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The other 10% would need some epilot input. That's the reason for SIV course. Aviation is inheritantly risky, we just try to mitigate as many as possible with knowledge.

  • @GregAnthonyHarris
    @GregAnthonyHarris 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Super job mate! Looks like you have the best of both worlds! : D

  • @ethelmarc3526
    @ethelmarc3526 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This comparison skews in favor of PPG. Better would be PPG trike vs Nanotrike as both are wheeled (specially trikes that fold into the trunk to even up more). Or if foot launch is preferred, PPG vs Powered HG. Then the lines blur more, the choice more subjective.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm talking about MY preference as people have asked me which of the 2 do I like. Its in the title, Which do I prefer? And I even say I like both. If it was PPG trike verses Powered HG Trike ( I have flown PPG trike), Powered HG trike would win every time, so much easier to launch and land.

  • @Adventure_Bum
    @Adventure_Bum 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for that! Great to have to comparison for someone like me trying to choose which way to go.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Glad it was helpful! Which one do you think you'll go for?

    • @Adventure_Bum
      @Adventure_Bum 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 the paramotor, due to it's view, short takeoff/landing and portability. I suspected the microlights had significantly greater speed, range, and robustness in bad weather, but seems that my suspicions were exaggerated. For someone seeking adveture in remote locations it seemsthe PPG would be better.

    • @miguelantonio7135
      @miguelantonio7135 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Adventure_Bum Flex wings benefits from evolution in last year's. Now's days are very fast wings in market, dudek warp for example, with trims out and speed bar go over 50 mph.

  • @adriansevic3192
    @adriansevic3192 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Interesting comparison! What would you say are the field size requirements for take off and landing in a peabee? Is 200x100 ft field enough? Provided no tall obstacles on either side.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Adrian, as you said, with no tall objects, if you changed your ft to meters you'd be safe. They come in a lot quicker than a paramotor. On my Hadron XX, I still needed over 100 meters from 50ft up, to land. I hope that helps. My Peabee has taken me on so many adventures.

    • @adriansevic3192
      @adriansevic3192 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 thanks
      So more than a foot launch powered hang glider, and definitely a lot more than a paramotor.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@adriansevic3192 I was probably being a bit over cautious, you could operate one in 150 meters but there is no point causing issues but being too tight on the lengths.

    • @adriansevic3192
      @adriansevic3192 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 Hi,
      See this is why I asked that particular question. I am a sailplane pilot but due to the nearest airport being 100km away and considering all the fees, I considered switching to another type of flying.
      It's definitely more due to the lack of close airports rather than portability (15m gliders can actually be trailered just fine). But where do I take off from? There is the river bank that stretches for miles here where I live that is nicely maintained, and would be a perfect strip. But ufortunately, I would probably get arrested if I flew from here.
      Both paramotors and powered kites offer car portability and soaring capability, and need less space to operate from. However if I am again bound to the airport with a trike, then I really haven't improved my situation at all.
      And I also see you quit ppg due to safety concerns. Since I come from the 3 axis,soft flapping wing makes me queasy.
      Hence I asked if it was possible to take off from a field that is the size of those I am surrounded with.
      My 1st idea was to go into hang gliding, and then powered, footlaunch, but everyone in the hanggliding community suggested it is very hard to footlaunch powered HG's and suggested to go with a trike.
      We are unfortunately pretty limited here in Croatia as far as HG and trike schools go. Both are on the far sides of the country from where I live unfortunately. So I am looking at all the pros and cons.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@adriansevic3192 I hope I have given you some help.

  • @savingrob
    @savingrob 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Anyone know where to find go to get ultralight trained and to buy one? Having a hard time finding one in the US

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I can't really help as I'm in the UK. Have you tired contacting FlyLight directly.

    • @savingrob
      @savingrob 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Golf Foxtrot 22 I’ll give it shot 😊 thank you

  • @edilbertosantana8307
    @edilbertosantana8307 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love to see again...n again.Beauty.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello, not sure what you want to see again?

  • @markvincentcocjin
    @markvincentcocjin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How about the life threatening points of failure? Could you compare the two based on that?

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Aviation is inherently dangerous, we can't get away from that. I don't have enough data to categorically say which one is more dangerous but I do carry a reserve canopy just in case.

  • @notimeliketoday9414
    @notimeliketoday9414 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This looks like fun 👍🤙

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi No Time like today, it certainly is and the PeaBee has certainly given me a new direction in my flying. Not pushing my videos but you'll soon see the amazing journey it's has taken me.

  • @kevchilton908
    @kevchilton908 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A very informative and well put together video for a SEP pilot who hasn't a clue about parameter or ultraight flying. But I do now! Thank you Giles 👌👍

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Kevin, thank you. I did get a lot of, I've no idea what paramotoring is, from GA pilots. I'm glad it helped. Its even funnier when I've called up ATC units and the radio goes quiet for 10 seconds...I'm sure they are nudging the controller next to them, "whats a paramotor".

  • @ironeagletrike
    @ironeagletrike ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video, enjoyed watching it and made me feel good to know I kind of a have a hybrid of what you are comparing in that I fly a paramotor trike. My biggest downside is portability, I keep it at an airport 65 miles away and can't easily move it other than with my cargo trailer. Biggest upside is I can fly without having to jump through the hoops of an FAA medical here in the US. I would love to fly anything that flies, would love to try out the PeaBee (or similar aircraft) sometime.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Iron Eagle Trike, welcome to the channel. I kind of know where you are coming from. I did have a paratrikes for my old Bailey 4 stroke but I jsut found it more difficult than just foot launching. The PeaBee has really become my passion and has ultimately allowed me to start a new career (later content if you are interested). Thanks for your comment.

    • @bohdan392
      @bohdan392 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 Hey Giles, L
      I'm loving your videos!! I fly paragliders but mainly a wheel base paramotor. I started off foot launching but due to an old motorcycle back injury I was forced to go to a ppg trike. I keep it in the back of a van and just need to fit the shroud/hoop to set up when I go flying. I'm about to resume WSM trike training as I have an Aeros Ant nano with Discus 15T wing I've been wanting to learn to fly, (Got a bargain I couldn't refuse :). I know paramotoring is in many ways more practical/portable but in stronger winds or with wrong direction the trike can become a handful! (unlike foot launching). I feel the nano will lend itself better to windy or crosswind days, plus for some reason I think I will feel more secure under the delta wing in crappy air, (even though I've been flying pg/ppg since '96), and contrary to your comments in this video. I also feel that the delta wings are more like an actual aircraft than paraglider wings. I think I need something new/different from pg/ppg as the passion (obsession) I used to have for ppg has been waning of recent times, almost to the degree of feeling like an inconvenience or an obligation :-/ The area I predominantly fly is absolutely beautiful, (Great Ocean Road region Victoria, Australia) so it's not the view. Maybe it's a case of 'been there-done that'. I have been told the new Adam 13tds wing is in many (not every) ways superior to the Discus 15T so hope to try it once I'm licensed/solo but I also understand that wing technology is continually improving and one doesn't need to have the latest 'whizz-Bang' gear to enjoy the hobby/sport, although it can often be safer and MORE enjoyable on more current gear. Apologies for the long post. Keep up the great work!

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi @bohdan, I've just found your comment, YT doesn't always show me comments if they are attached to others comments. Thank you for your comment and I have shifted my views since making this. I still think both are fun ways to fly but the Flexwing ( Delta wing) is the safer option and I would definitely fly the flex in must stronger and rougher conditions than I would in a paramotor. The Adam wing is good but I can't compare it to the DISCUS as I haven't flown it. If you've seen my ore recent content you'll see how much I enjoy flying the ADAM, but flexwing flying does make me smile. Hope to see you in the comments section in the future and safe flying until next time.

  • @Chris-Fennimore
    @Chris-Fennimore 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Niles, thanks for the comparison.
    BTW... would you happen to know if there is a PPG instructor at RAF Finmere? I see there is a Hang Gliding school there, but I am not sure about PPG. I am wondering, since my son is stationed at RAF Crouton, maybe he could take his PPG lessons over there. Thanks!

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think that was a mistype of my name.. Haha. The nearest PPG instructor near to you will be CM Paramotors. Give them a shout and easy to find online. Outside of that have a look on the BHPA website and it will give you a list of school. I hope that helps.

    • @Chris-Fennimore
      @Chris-Fennimore 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 Thanks for the info, Giles. Sorry, yes. Haha. Brain is still foggy this morning.

  • @motiv311
    @motiv311 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Which one would be better to Mount an electric skateboard to? So you could semi fly as you ride off and on a big steep hill? (Electric skateboards have brakes , go up to 60 mph, and have big treaded tires)

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm not sure I can help on this one. The video is about which one do I prefer, between 2 of my flying machines.

  • @bartholomewlyons
    @bartholomewlyons ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Which one would allow you to travel from city to city, from country to country?
    How much gear can you haul with you on such journeys.
    I understand that just flying around is a blessing as is, but for a wanderlust people, this should be a transport around the globe.
    What laws prevent you from just going anywhere you wanted to?

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  ปีที่แล้ว

      I don't think these are practical vehicles for flying from city to city. It could be achieved but they are so subject to the wind and weather conditions. I hope that helps.

  • @LewisHolford
    @LewisHolford 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I cannot wait to learn!

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Which one, that's the question 😁?

    • @LewisHolford
      @LewisHolford 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 Paramotor for sure! Still trying to find out the rules and regulations about it. I lives in such a good spot for it it seems too!

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@LewisHolford Flying is flying and once you have been up, you will always want to go back.

  • @edilbertosantana8307
    @edilbertosantana8307 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great VIDEO.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you. it was just in response to a question I kept getting asked by my flying friends.

  • @sqlb3rn
    @sqlb3rn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I want to get a paramotor, but kinda nervous about wing collapse. Have seen some nasty videos where the wing just folds up on itself.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I completely understand what you mean, paraglider wings are soft and rely on air pressure to make them work. As you learn to fly, you realise that the collapses will happen and they can actually be controlled. The beauty of paramotoring is that you can choose when you fly and the conditions you fly in. I'm guessing you have seen paragliders having collapses more than paramotor wings, this is generally because when we fly paragliders, we need up currents to stay up, this brings with it, unstable air and a greater chance of collapses, which have to be controlled. Aviation has risk, I'm not going to hide that, but you can make it as safe as possible by learning how to fly, and never stop learning. I hope that helps.

  • @edilbertosantana8307
    @edilbertosantana8307 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice one.

  • @migueldias1766
    @migueldias1766 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    And for an hour of flight with the same motor, who's uses less fuel, paramotor or hang glider trike?

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Miguel, the paramotor uses less but also flies slower. I can cover 100 miles in the PeaBee in 2 hours 45 minutes using only 15 litres. I could cover the same distance in my old paramotor using only 5 litres an hour but that same distance would take 3.5 hours so the fuel burn for distance covered is about the same.

  • @mjotd8670
    @mjotd8670 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just seen your channel, and was impressed with both content and quality - hence, you have another subscriber!

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello MJOTD, thank you. You must recognise some of the locations 😉. I'm just a part time vlogger with a full time day job, and enjoy sharing my passion for flying and all things aviation.

    • @mjotd8670
      @mjotd8670 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 Thank you for the quick, reply, indeed, I think we are both from the same region of the Uk, and I too, also have a keen interest in aviation, recently started watching Tucker Gott's videos, which now has me interested in paramotoring.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have some good paramotor content, which should be of interest. I don't paramotor as much atm.

    • @mjotd8670
      @mjotd8670 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 Yes, indeed, I am currently working my way through them - many thanks

  • @stone8597
    @stone8597 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great video...very objective...thanks. Also, on the Pee Bee, there are people that land in crosswind using various techniques...just wondering what those might be? I know with the single surface wing it is more susceptible turbulence...but maybe holding the bar in and landing faster. Ben Ashman might give you a pointer or two. I've ordered a Aeros ANT and now fly a PPG Trike (so no foot launch), and plan to keep both. I'm just wondering about the difference in these two. The PPG trike can take more space to take off then a foot launch....but it will be nice to have both. Everything is a trade-off and nothing more so than in the world of aviation. Thanks again.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Pretty much every landing I do on the farm strip is crosswind. Ben and my instructor have both shown or explained the technique which is what I'm using. The limiting factor is weight for the wind speed. The new trim point has certainly helped.

  • @ecoturismovalle1570
    @ecoturismovalle1570 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That microlight landing was just like butter

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I was quite pleased with it. It was a super smooth evening as well. Thanks for finding my channel.

  • @DeadReckoner
    @DeadReckoner ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey :) I'm here from Terry's video recommendation. Interesting stuff! I make videos too. I'm a fixed wing pilot - how does training start for paramotors? Given the single-seat nature of it, I mean!

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Dead Reckoner, and welcome to the lighter side of flying. Good question and I hope this gives sufficient overview. Paramotoring can be achieved in many ways (from a UK perspective). Lots and lots of ground handling to get wing control. Then depending on where you learn, you get winch flights to get used to progressively higher flights and landing practice, then the motor is added. If there isn't a winch stage, then you are literally moved to your first flight with a motor. Obviously there is a lot more detail behind it but that's an overview. I hope that helps.

    • @DeadReckoner
      @DeadReckoner ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Golf Foxtrot 22 thanks for that! Do you have any fixed wing experience? If you ever fancy filming together, that'd be fun! Scott

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Scott, I do, I gained my PPL A in 1996 and flew gliders from the age of 14. It's weird because I've flown stick and rudder for 25 years but wished I'd found flexwing flying sooner.

  • @brentsmith5647
    @brentsmith5647 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliant video thank u 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello Brent, thank you and I'm glad you enjoyed it. I think you posted your comment twice, was that deliberate?

  • @Superkuh2
    @Superkuh2 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Which do you think is more dangerous for the same amount of flight time in optimal conditions for each?

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If they are flown in optimal conditions and adequate training and currency is in place then both are just as safe as each other. The flexwing might just have a nose in front due to its solid wing construction. I hope that helps.

  • @dsd-downshiftdave8056
    @dsd-downshiftdave8056 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If something fails or goes wrong what do you do? I know some skidivers have a back up parachute

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi DSD, both these machines have a reserve chute. Most microlight or light aircraft don't have any alternative, they just crash. I hope that helps.

  • @JimsRobot
    @JimsRobot 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The perfect video as I start my journey. Is one significantly safer than the other in mild conditions?

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Heading West, aviation is inherently dangerous, but with the correct training and education you learn to understand when to and when not to fly. To answer your question for mild conditions, I would feel just as safe in both. Its only in the rougher conditions that I would feel safer in the Flexwing (PeaBee). I hope that helps.

  • @michaelantonio1367
    @michaelantonio1367 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thumbs up! Fly safe my friend.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hello Michael, many thanks,. Many happy and safe flights since this video was made.

  • @daleyoung87
    @daleyoung87 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    At some point, you want to go somewhere. Not just hang out in the air. I'd go with the trike, but I fly gyros.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes, there is that balance and I have covered some serious distances in paramotors but it does take a long time. The only limiting factor on the Sub70 trike is fuel, I can actually fly further on the Paramotor as they stand but the PeaBee gets me there faster, and in more comfort. There has been lots of developments since I made this video and I now have my pilots licence which allows me to carry more fuel on the PeaBee. I've never been in a an Autogyro but they do look amazing and comply different to anything I've flown before.

  • @geratditomarme2795
    @geratditomarme2795 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Qué bello ,,,me gustaría estar allí

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Espero que tenham gostado do vídeo

  • @DonHavjuan
    @DonHavjuan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The paramotor is also much easier to transport, much quicker to get in the air. When the weather is right, you want to get up there ASAP

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's a balance. Yes the paramotor gets up there quicker but is actually slower in the air. Also the PeaBee can handle different conditions. As I mentioned in the video, one is not better than they both get you in the air.

  • @GodzillaGoesGaga
    @GodzillaGoesGaga 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What are the laws in the UK for Paramaotor and Ultralight from a pilot certification standpoint ?

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Godzilla, in the UK for a paramotor and Sub70 kg machine, you do not require a licence or training to fly either. The moment your machine goes above that weight, you need to have pilots microlight licence. I hope that helps answer your question. Where do you fly?

    • @GodzillaGoesGaga
      @GodzillaGoesGaga 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@GolfFoxtrot22 I was learning unpowered paragliding in CA. Decided it’s not for me and prefer powered flight. The issue with unpowered Paragliders IMO is collapses and backside mountain rotor (in powered machines you have an “out” whereas unpowered you are a slave to the rotor).

  • @hunttomuchwolfe
    @hunttomuchwolfe 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I would like to get into flying what would you say is the easiest to learn on

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      PPG is easier to learn for sure. I like a challenge and really enjoyed the Powered Hang glider transition. Have a look at my Paramotor to PeaBee playlist, I vlogged all my lessons.

  • @turkeyphant
    @turkeyphant 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where do you put your mirror to see your tank on your paramotor? I find the angles really difficult.

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Jon, I made a little sleeve for a metal camping mirror on a key retractor. I just grab it and angle it holding it near the tank with my non-throttle hand. I made the tank lines long and short to ident odd and even numbers or litres and just count them up. I hope that helps.

  • @sebakimoji4595
    @sebakimoji4595 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    nice One. i am interested on this

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Which side are you interested in?

  • @DougBow96
    @DougBow96 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the comparison. All of your PeaBee vids have me thinking about an UL with wheels now. LOL

    • @GolfFoxtrot22
      @GolfFoxtrot22  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think since I made this, I have favoured the trike style now.