Interview with Peter L. Berger on The Social Construction of Reality

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 43

  • @jonathanmizuta5912
    @jonathanmizuta5912 7 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Thank you, Dr. Berger, for your contribution to the social construction of our reality.

  • @rascalkr4967
    @rascalkr4967 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    "Not all constructions are equally valid." Truth.

  • @abishekchettri2351
    @abishekchettri2351 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you Dr Berger.

  • @volkangocoglu2948
    @volkangocoglu2948 7 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Thank you for this interview. I was influenced by the book and wondering about the writers. This fresh video made me happy.

  • @daviddulom8258
    @daviddulom8258 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    🥰🥰🥰 thank you for this interview😇
    We cant see Karl mark and other sociologists talk about their theories and perspectives, nice to see him, greetz and other social scientists talking about their works.

  • @lindadunn8787
    @lindadunn8787 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That all constructions are not equally valid seems ground on which to stand even in this shifty time. Many thanks for this thoughtful interview.

  • @honawikeepa5813
    @honawikeepa5813 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you for great video.

  • @Blancokerim2
    @Blancokerim2 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Godfather of my knowledge!

  • @sunithaolry2636
    @sunithaolry2636 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks for this interview

  • @breezewatchtower
    @breezewatchtower 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Wonderful words from a wonderful man!

  • @z0uLess
    @z0uLess 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I am very interested in this concept of pluralism.

  • @sunithaolry2636
    @sunithaolry2636 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Even the social scientists know how to laugh...😍

  • @Schmidt54
    @Schmidt54 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Well, I mean, Buddhism had it first, but since that does not count towards Western science, this is the thing. Especially with people ideologizing the idea that everything is a social construct and abusing the concept towards political or social activist goals, quotes like "not all constructions are equally valid" and that "Not to be able to distinguish reality from ideology is actually the clinical definition of schizophrenia" are the sound of reasoning we definetly need these days.

    • @aryansaini5178
      @aryansaini5178 ปีที่แล้ว

      real ID se aao Suneet sir

    • @That_Freedom_Guy
      @That_Freedom_Guy ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, I agree! I stumbled upon this subject because I was independently proposing a similar model for the scientific West but inspired by Buddhism. Story Immersion and Narrative engagement are different facets of the mental construction of reality, including the Self. I am hooked!

  • @Fuadi610
    @Fuadi610 ปีที่แล้ว

    Terimakasih abah telah menyumbang pemikiran saya atas konstruksi sosial terhadap kenyataan kita

  • @tarikyildirim8859
    @tarikyildirim8859 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Teşekkürler Berger

  • @1mp0ss1b1e
    @1mp0ss1b1e 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    LEGEND!

  • @z0uLess
    @z0uLess 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I feel that people that "know of" the book instead of reading it seem to think that there is no realism in it. I must admit that I thought so myself before reading it. To me, I dont see the contradiction between this theory and biological theories of human behavior.

    • @larrybaron5962
      @larrybaron5962 ปีที่แล้ว

      Berger and Luckmann's theory is opposite of biological theories in that they see people as having an instinctual deficit that is compensated for by culture. In other words they see culture as a substitute for our lack of instincts. If you remove the structure provided by norms and values (i.e. culture) people are left in a state of anomie (borrowing from Durkheim), which Berger and Luckmann view as a state of meaninglessness and terror.

  • @booyaka870
    @booyaka870 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is he saying securization theory or secularization theory at 14:56?

  • @alonsoaravena6209
    @alonsoaravena6209 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Peter Berger's friendship with Thomas Luckmann 00:00 to 2:28

  • @takauma
    @takauma 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Social Constructivism as Paradigm? The Legacy of The Social Why are Peter L. Berger and Thomas Luckmann Austrians?

  • @thepalebluedot4171
    @thepalebluedot4171 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @6:20 Those 3 bearded men from latin america wanted some sort of Social engineering (political science) project, similar to the 1920s the government of the Soviet Union embarked on a campaign to fundamentally alter the behavior and ideals of Soviet citizens, to replace the old social frameworks of the Russian Empire with a new Soviet culture, and to develop the New Soviet man. Commissars became agents of social engineering.
    The Cultural Revolution (CR), formally known as the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, was a sociopolitical movement in the People's Republic of China (PRC). It was launched by Mao Zedong in 1966 and lasted until his death in 1976
    In India, social engineering was effectively done in the state of Bihar, on a grand scale, to unify different castes after 2005.
    In his political science book, The Open Society and Its Enemies, volume I, The Spell of Plato (1945), Karl Popper made a distinction between the principles of 'what he called "piecemeal social engineering" and Utopian social engineering..

  • @jusannttv
    @jusannttv 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    RIP

  • @atulhadap2176
    @atulhadap2176 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    secularization

  • @pluralidad
    @pluralidad 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Like!!!!

  • @fredericklacuesta5511
    @fredericklacuesta5511 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    19:00

  • @HenryCasillas
    @HenryCasillas 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ❄️

  • @bryanpepperell
    @bryanpepperell 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Society is more than just a social construction. The Bible had a tremendous impact on society but you cannot say the Bible is just a social construction. The Bible makes distinctive claims that are set it above a social construction.

    • @Elizaluppi
      @Elizaluppi 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      bryanpepperell did you read the book?

    • @hssy2jrocker
      @hssy2jrocker 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      makes claims. There you said it yourself.

    • @emreengin5163
      @emreengin5163 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Elizaluppi which book do you mean? Sounds to me that he read none of them fully.

    • @johnshrader4051
      @johnshrader4051 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      He makes a valid point though. At what level does divine inspiration and revelation, be it in the Bible or from a a saint or a shaman, influence the construction of reality???

    • @Katemione
      @Katemione 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Well religion is nothing more than a social construct, isn‘t it

  • @atulhadap2176
    @atulhadap2176 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    secularization