Flawless Victory in Standard? | Phyrexian Fight Club | Magic: the Gathering (MTG)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 132

  • @jrjamesson
    @jrjamesson ปีที่แล้ว +121

    I love the "we need something to snatch the crown away from all the black decks" - followed up by playing sheoldred and invoke despair

    • @DimT670
      @DimT670 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      But you see, there's some green in this deck 😂

    • @Crunchatize_Me_Senpai
      @Crunchatize_Me_Senpai ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Illustrates his point pretty well though lol

  • @zachgray4767
    @zachgray4767 ปีที่แล้ว +134

    I understand the one Forest in the land base is for Bushwhack, but you have no double-green spells in the list. That means if you're even casting Bushwhack, you already have all the green you need. The odds of missing turn-4 Obliterator are higher than (a) needing to cast two separate fight spells, (b) having an Obliterator on board already, (c) having two fight spells in your hand, AND (d) having two green sources to cast them.

    • @davidhansen5067
      @davidhansen5067 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      It can be relevant to cast two fight spells on one turn, for instance to beat instant-speed removal. Also is important to have an out to Demolition Field on your green source.

    • @derekcline950
      @derekcline950 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@davidhansen5067 it is also possible for your opponent to Boseiju you before your second turn. Starting triome with swamps in hand, Boseiju would be devastating without the forest

    • @ChaosForce08
      @ChaosForce08 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@derekcline950 Huh? You just get another Triome if they Boseiju. Demofield/Ruin makes more sense, but it only wrecks you if they have one in hand before turn 5-6, they choose to activate it that early instead of being proactive, and you don't have 2+ green sources. As someone who plays a suite of colorless lands in Mono-W including the fields, I'm not activating that early unless I have absolutely nothing else to do.

    • @JaxonUm
      @JaxonUm ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@derekcline950 Boseju is land with a basic land type, not a basic land

    • @derekcline950
      @derekcline950 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@JaxonUm oh yeah, good point. I forget that in Standard, where there aren't many lands with basic land types (besides basic lands and the triomes)

  • @kayezpz
    @kayezpz ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Seth, you are a cornerstone of my magic world, a sensei in the ways of magic, one of a few. Just to say it, and only my view of things. Love the things you do and how, as a magic fan. Keep it up!

  • @ferdithetank7535
    @ferdithetank7535 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Having a couple Thruns in sideboard might've helped aggainst control matchups, Tyranax Rex also sounds great

  • @andrewsigrist9981
    @andrewsigrist9981 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    17:15 apparently "so many counters" means 1 counter

  • @daktastik
    @daktastik ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I actually respond "smiley" to most losses as long as the game was well fought, especially if opponent is playing something interesting. I'll respond "frowny" if it's the fifth t3 Greasefang of the day or my opponent's first three plays of the game were counters, but even then, I'm sure it's because I'm paying mostly midrange.

    • @shinymetalassassin
      @shinymetalassassin ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I mostly save the frowny face for salty ropers.

  • @jameshayes-barber9340
    @jameshayes-barber9340 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    3:01 stomper can't block if the opponent only has 4 lands

  • @OGTahoe3
    @OGTahoe3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I've been using a Boros Deck in Standard. Focuses around "Repair and Recharge" to bring back the new Emperor or Portal. Tons of creatures with looting or draw at 2 cmc. Invoke Justice also with a couple copies

  • @OGNoNameNobody
    @OGNoNameNobody ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I think *Rotpriest* will be viable in best of 3 if you go with the "transformative sideboad" plan, where the priest sides-out for game 2.

  • @DDNEV
    @DDNEV ปีที่แล้ว +8

    @12:25 wouldn't it have been more wise to attack with the obliterator you have on board, if they block they trade and still sacrifice if they dont you get 5 damage then can still fight and play the new one you have in hand?

    • @brianh5844
      @brianh5844 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yup. You could also, if you really did want to fight pre-combat for whatever reason, play and fight with the summoning sick obliterator before combat.

  • @ashenr1der
    @ashenr1der ปีที่แล้ว +52

    im gonna talk about fight club

    • @jbuzzcuzz9728
      @jbuzzcuzz9728 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You’re the kind of guy who would talk about Bruno too huh?

    • @jamescooley5241
      @jamescooley5241 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jbuzzcuzz9728 HAh

    • @sjaedn
      @sjaedn ปีที่แล้ว

      Breakin the second rule eh?

    • @adamtobiasz8793
      @adamtobiasz8793 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Then you will get beaten up and die for it.

  • @Fundsalow
    @Fundsalow ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The historic version is nice running Colossificantion and give it to the opponents creature before fighting

  • @AaronSentinal
    @AaronSentinal ปีที่แล้ว +11

    No Fight Rigging in Fight Club, sadge

    • @derekcline950
      @derekcline950 ปีที่แล้ว

      I tried making a Fight Rigging version. This deck sort of struggles against removal already. Dropping 8 creatures, interaction or card draw for 4 Fight Riggings and 4 large payoffs is rough.

  • @Cameron-ds9xs
    @Cameron-ds9xs ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I made a fight deck with the Obliterator and no black mana with transmogrify and old Lucca. And a surprise Obliterator with blizzard brawl on turn 4 is pretty neat.

  • @tianruixiao9239
    @tianruixiao9239 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    KDB: Let me talk about fight club!
    Thanks for the fun video Seth, love the intro!

  • @Tawnos_
    @Tawnos_ ปีที่แล้ว +3

    There have been a couple games where my opponent tore me apart where I still had fun. This deck would probably be fun the first few times I encountered it, but miserable if it became half of the meta.

  • @LolaliciousSmiley
    @LolaliciousSmiley ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I like to imagine community managers in a meeting with r&d: "So, what do the players think about the addition of Ragavan?" and they just flip a big notepad with "12% :), 88% :(".

  • @r4g1ngph03n1x
    @r4g1ngph03n1x ปีที่แล้ว +1

    3:00 And since they can't block with stomper, you should still crew and swing with bankbuster.

  • @Sniperstem
    @Sniperstem ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've been playing a similar deck in historic and have loved it

  • @cainejohnson3227
    @cainejohnson3227 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The editors been killing it here lately!

  • @lacrimursus8727
    @lacrimursus8727 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    11:40 “Arena lines up poorly against Sheoldred” note he did not say _Phyrexian_ Arena. I swear I ran into mono blue in Historic that splashed black for Sheoldred.

    • @jamesrule1338
      @jamesrule1338 ปีที่แล้ว

      kinda makes me proud that I'm running an Esper control deck with no Sheoldred on Arena. I do have a Jin-Gitaxias, so I'm not NOT a monster...

  • @tayo-music
    @tayo-music ปีที่แล้ว

    The thumbnail art is just too perfect

  • @klydewithak9456
    @klydewithak9456 ปีที่แล้ว

    I made this with fight rigging, shake down heavy, and demon of the dross. So much fun

  • @petercollins1122
    @petercollins1122 ปีที่แล้ว

    'Blunked' might be my favorite sethism

  • @zachariahmcgovern5465
    @zachariahmcgovern5465 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I think an "upkeep tribal" deck in historic would be kinda cool to see. With phyrexian arena, dreadhorde invasion, and the new mite card, you could have a ton of upkeep triggers. Something like angelic visitation to turn them all into 4/4 angels, and the new token doubler guy would be pretty cool.

    • @alsono3195
      @alsono3195 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      An upkeep tribal deck would be really good if paradox haze was in arena

    • @Linky609
      @Linky609 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'd swap arena for black market connection or perhaps run both.

    • @jamesrule1338
      @jamesrule1338 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I ran a deck that did a ton of insane stuff during my upkeep (Hells caretakers + death and enter the battlefield triggers). It was great. After spending serval minutes blowing up opponents permanents, drawing cards and creating creature tokens people would ask " Are you done your turn yet?" and I'd say "No, now I draw a card and take the rest of my turn."

    • @faceoctopus4571
      @faceoctopus4571 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alsono3195 I wouldn't go as far as to say it'd be really good, but I would at least see the appeal. Without a card like that, seems kind of pointless to me.

  • @jms4979
    @jms4979 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "The third rule of fight club is.. If this is the first time this ability has triggered this turn... IT'S NOT A MAY"

  • @takumi1137
    @takumi1137 ปีที่แล้ว

    I thought this deck would have Fight rigging on the decklist for the meme lol
    Anyway, this deck looks fun

  • @user-sq7ry5vx7t
    @user-sq7ry5vx7t ปีที่แล้ว

    Don't even play the game anymore, but keep in touch with the new sets just to watch Seth

  • @pinkvishnu
    @pinkvishnu ปีที่แล้ว

    YES I've been looking forward to this one.

  • @theyonlycomeoutwhenitsquiet
    @theyonlycomeoutwhenitsquiet ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Remember! The first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club!

  • @Bongus_Bubogus
    @Bongus_Bubogus ปีที่แล้ว

    I took Ichormoon Gauntlet out of my superfriends deck. Not good enough when all my planeswalkers already have killer plus abilities I’d rather use instead, and the bottom half of the card is overcosted if it’s there to only do that.

  • @bluedog4248
    @bluedog4248 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I'm surprised there's no thrun in this deck, considering you can give it indestructible on your turn

    • @jrjamesson
      @jrjamesson ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I don't think he wants a double-green card with the obliterator mana base, and the point of the fight spells is purely to work with obliterator to get them to sacrifice permanents

  • @DroneConflict
    @DroneConflict 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @12:25 shoulda dropped the other Oblitorator to fight with so the one without summoning sickness could swing

  • @winniebowser4447
    @winniebowser4447 ปีที่แล้ว

    'Glissa gets blunked' cracked me up so much

  • @digitalbadger89
    @digitalbadger89 ปีที่แล้ว

    I made this deck in Explorer a few days ago so I could use snow lands and Blizzard Brawl. It's just as deliciously stupid of a combo in eternal formats.

  • @dracish123456789
    @dracish123456789 ปีที่แล้ว

    Here to promote monoMountain Rakdos and monoMountain gruul for standard.
    Gruul is slightly worse overall but has abetter match up against mono white while rakdos powers through with removal.
    Both decks have the same red package main board and two mirrex sideboard.

    • @jasonkorf7700
      @jasonkorf7700 ปีที่แล้ว

      Red Aggro is as dead as a deck can be in Standard. There's too many problems for the deck and not enough efficient answers.

    • @dracish123456789
      @dracish123456789 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jasonkorf7700 It's not aggro. It's mid range control. It can go aggro if not dealt with or the right draw, but the deck is designed around a slow grind full of non spell removal and targets to draw out removal and ultimately win around turn 11-15 with either Urabrask's Forge, or Koth Ult as the primary win. (Or poison in game 2-3. With mirrex)
      Rakdos deals with creatures and planeswalkers easier.
      Gruul deals with enchantments easier.
      The only tough deck for both is mono white.
      I say gruul and rakdos but sideboard the gruul deck has both black and white cards in it. and rakdos has tear asunder.

    • @dracish123456789
      @dracish123456789 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jasonkorf7700 Please don't imply my deck is aggro when you don't know what it is. And it isn't mono red it is mono mountain. There is a difference.

  • @NathanielSimpson1481
    @NathanielSimpson1481 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Would a tamyo's safekeeping be worth it, protects from removal and keeps the obliterater alive through fighting higher stuff (or attack them fight)

  • @SeiShinjitsuShi
    @SeiShinjitsuShi ปีที่แล้ว

    ~17mins, invoke being bad means you should've ran it out, to potentially eat a counter or remove some attackers. Doing nothing is worse.

  • @LazyQahnaarin
    @LazyQahnaarin ปีที่แล้ว +1

    He broke the first two rules of Fight Club.

  • @Atmapalazzo
    @Atmapalazzo ปีที่แล้ว

    The Simic poison combo doesn't seem to work as well as just running Selesnya toxic.

  • @zachariahmcgovern5465
    @zachariahmcgovern5465 ปีที่แล้ว

    Glissa is so sweet. I love the design

  • @zotha
    @zotha ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Seth : gets countered a single time
    Also Seth : SOOOO MANY COUNTERS

  • @jaxsonbateman
    @jaxsonbateman ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I made a similar deck just after One came out. Had an awesome game where my opponent ramped into and then tapped out for a 10/10 Hydroid Krasis, which I subsequently fought and wiped their board. Didn't matter that they had 7 cards in hand; they're so far behind at that point facing down black's current collection of goodstuff that it was GG.

  • @perezo27
    @perezo27 ปีที่แล้ว

    The +1/+1 on the Underdog against the token on the first Superfriends matchup wasn't actually that important, you could have crewed the Bankbuster with the Underdog that was gonna fight. Underdog would have died, but you still would have had the 4 power to kill opponent.

  • @ricardonalvarte3842
    @ricardonalvarte3842 ปีที่แล้ว

    That thumbnail was enough 🤣

  • @ursulcx299
    @ursulcx299 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder, would this work better with the white vindicator, fight to deal damage to the player without attacking

  • @Kasigi03
    @Kasigi03 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I understand the love to have the Obliterator to fight, but why not cast and swing?? Take five or combat and lose.

  • @faceoctopus4571
    @faceoctopus4571 ปีที่แล้ว

    8:24, what is wrong with casting Glissa here? A death touch first strike is a potent blocker. Fighting Reflection to protect Glissa from Ertai Resurrected getting copied isn't necessary because Reflection can't copy legendaries. You could, if you wanted, use Glissa to fight fable if you wanted. I would think casting Glissa might buy the time needed to go obliterator into fight spells.

  • @mth4456
    @mth4456 ปีที่แล้ว

    In response to the rotpriest Combo. I think your opponent severely misplayed. If you have multiple protection spells you shouldn't do a protection in response to the duress and tap out. I've been playing the aggro Toxic in standard BO1 and it has hit Diamond so far. Rotpriest is a great distraction in that deck. So I think it doesn't work in BO3 but your opponent also didn't play that well IMO.

  • @nosyamthegreat8768
    @nosyamthegreat8768 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would gix be a better draw card then pherexian arena?

  • @F4xP4s
    @F4xP4s ปีที่แล้ว

    How are planeswalkers compleated if they are less powerful?

  • @theblakwarior
    @theblakwarior 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ok this deck was less a real brew and more a "play the best black spells (+glissa) in the format, except we also put in 8 fight spells."
    Eh its still pretty fun.

  • @kiltr4p851
    @kiltr4p851 ปีที่แล้ว

    My brother has had one of these decks since day one. He beat some streamer named covert go blue with it and homeboy became a salt mine🤣

  • @shot040
    @shot040 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is the seth i missed. punting multiple times in a game.

  • @Oceanz08
    @Oceanz08 ปีที่แล้ว

    Im not sure we should consider this a brew 🤔

  • @moonlight_scribe
    @moonlight_scribe ปีที่แล้ว

    Haven't played standard in a long while, but Grixis looks annoyingly good.

  • @Slimreaper13
    @Slimreaper13 ปีที่แล้ว

    We did it guys!! We got phyrexian obliterator value!!

  • @Crazymachin3gun
    @Crazymachin3gun ปีที่แล้ว

    I just watched fight club, literally got into a fight for my life the next day. This is hilarious!

  • @andynonya1490
    @andynonya1490 ปีที่แล้ว

    Alternate title "Teaching Arean Zoomers about Phyrexian Obliterator"

  • @brettfishell477
    @brettfishell477 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it possible to build a burn/infect deck in mtg I would like to try

  • @47Mortuus
    @47Mortuus ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This feels more like a sealed deck, with how all over the place and unfocused the deck is.

  • @Heavymetalhunk
    @Heavymetalhunk ปีที่แล้ว

    Haha no matter how many times I try to hear your name correctly I keep mishearing it as "Seth-Row-Olive" 😆

  • @Old-dec
    @Old-dec 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sheoldred so good you don’t want to play arena? 13:48

  • @pokeyclawz8727
    @pokeyclawz8727 ปีที่แล้ว

    If rotpriest wanted to be a deck that was good enough to play in bo3 i think they would need a functional reprint of rotpriest so they could run 8 copies lol

  • @christopherneil8265
    @christopherneil8265 ปีที่แล้ว

    The poison ivy player has very obviously never piloted that style of deck before. You never are supposed to play your threats without protection up.
    I also don’t like the corrupted cards in that deck. Those are for dedicated toxic decks. The poison ivy deck should be played either as a tempo deck with a combo finish or a dedicated combo. In either case, the corrupted cards will almost never be on

  • @jamesreynolds6219
    @jamesreynolds6219 ปีที่แล้ว

    I THINK I CAN SMELL WHAT THE ROCK IS COOKING!!!!

  • @erictraub5202
    @erictraub5202 ปีที่แล้ว

    All this deck showed me is how unbelievably OP invoke despair is. 100% needs a ban

  • @F4xP4s
    @F4xP4s ปีที่แล้ว

    Why did your Sheoldred trigger before the opponent’s?

    • @pawsti
      @pawsti ปีที่แล้ว

      Abilities with the same trigger follow the APNAP rule. This means the active player (the opponent) puts all triggered abilities they control on the stack in any order they want (Sheoldred on draw in this case) followed by the non-active player putting all abilities they control on the stack in any order. Since it was the opponent's turn, they were the active player and Seth's trigger resolves first.

    • @F4xP4s
      @F4xP4s ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pawsti Of course! Thanks

  • @Crusina
    @Crusina ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you god for not being the one that plays 4 fight spells total and says the deck is bad.

  • @jamo5882
    @jamo5882 ปีที่แล้ว

    The proving grounds are just for cycling???? That doesn't seem worth the drawback of coming in tapped

  • @chazbrown1139
    @chazbrown1139 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do I get these cards in Arena? I know you craft some with the wildcards but do you have to do that for basic lands too?

    • @seanclark4071
      @seanclark4071 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No, basic land arts are you get by buying them from the store

    • @Donovarkhallum
      @Donovarkhallum ปีที่แล้ว

      As soon as you build a deck and put an obliterator in it'll add like 24 swamps. Those are free . Play matches and do the dailies and weeklies and just do non competitive until you get cards and open phyrexian packs. Or spend money lol

  • @tkalle1299
    @tkalle1299 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why did that first stomper die when it had first strike?

    • @pawsti
      @pawsti ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Fight means "two target creatures deal damage to each other equal to their power", so while it might seem similar to attack/block, it is different that abilities like First or Double Strike are ignored. Keep in mind that the creatures are still the sources of the damage, meaning stuff like Deathtouch or Lifelink (or, in this deck's case, Obliterator's sacrifice trigger) still works

    • @faceoctopus4571
      @faceoctopus4571 ปีที่แล้ว

      Did it die from a fight? Cause Fight doesn't care about first strike. Yeah it's a flavor fail, but WotC considered the extra wording and complexity to not be worth it.

  • @jamesrule1338
    @jamesrule1338 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    But in project MTG we have no names...

  • @DeathsjesterKMNP
    @DeathsjesterKMNP ปีที่แล้ว

    ugh, I hope they realize the mistake of adding oblit to standard, looking forward to that ban.

  • @vexion42
    @vexion42 ปีที่แล้ว

    Seems more Against the Odds.

  • @jaydavidrn82
    @jaydavidrn82 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    obliterater with throne fighting atraxa = sac 14 bro 😂

  • @ThePOKEMONFOEVA
    @ThePOKEMONFOEVA ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Tried this deck three times and played against three decks without minions

  • @ryanlacey4248
    @ryanlacey4248 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where is modern

  • @alaraplatt8104
    @alaraplatt8104 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    complains about not drawing one of his 8 fight spells... meanwhile theres only 7 in the deck because he boarded one out

  • @person3176
    @person3176 ปีที่แล้ว

    casting arena over trespasser to block the fable token was soo greedy imo :D i think the game would've looked a lot different if you played trespasser. Love the deck tho!

  • @jerrymcdaniel6643
    @jerrymcdaniel6643 ปีที่แล้ว

    The arena shuffler is frustrating lol

  • @mitchhak2
    @mitchhak2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Oh so you’ve stopped making mtgo content. Must’ve missed the announcement

  • @Deer_God
    @Deer_God ปีที่แล้ว

    Sucks that we cant talk about this video.

  • @AC3handle
    @AC3handle ปีที่แล้ว

    smamp?

  • @TheQueerLeaf
    @TheQueerLeaf ปีที่แล้ว

    ❤️

  • @12sillyalex66
    @12sillyalex66 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is why I don’t play standard

  • @zephiel1932
    @zephiel1932 ปีที่แล้ว

    I hate this card so much, it literally invalidates red and green as colors, its an auto concede on cast its so dumb, just because its a phyrexian dosent mean it needed a reprint, especially when black is already the strongest color right now.

  • @ArthurDemacqPontoglio
    @ArthurDemacqPontoglio ปีที่แล้ว

    As toxic as infect

  • @gaivscaesar
    @gaivscaesar ปีที่แล้ว

    It's really distracting and visually annoying seeing you constantly flicking and moving the cards in hand over and over again.

  • @charlied8284
    @charlied8284 ปีที่แล้ว

    Only chumps use/make sideboards

  • @alejandrocaycedo5038
    @alejandrocaycedo5038 ปีที่แล้ว

    WHY ARE YOU SPEAKING LIKE THAT?????

  • @CoachMitchell23
    @CoachMitchell23 ปีที่แล้ว

    I see you ripped off my boy's logo. Wtf? Mtg Fight Club soap bar is not your property. I hope you do better to watch your staff in the future.

    • @CoachMitchell23
      @CoachMitchell23 ปีที่แล้ว

      So I guess we can use the Goldfish logo, right?

  • @StarshadowMelody
    @StarshadowMelody ปีที่แล้ว

    If you're conceding b/c your opponent is literally about to kill you, you're just a prick. Spend the seconds to let it play out, don't be a killjoy.