1951 C-124 Disappearance: Updated Version

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ต.ค. 2023
  • This episode was posted last month, but had audio issues. While the History Guy is on vacation, please enjoy this updated version with the sound issues corrected.
    At 1:06 am on March 23rd. 1951, a C-124 Globemaster II of the United States Air Force, bound from Maine to the United Kingdom, sent a routine message to oceanic control in Ireland, providing a revised estimated time of arrival. The plane, with 53 people aboard, never reached its destination. The fate of the plane and men has become one of the enduring mysteries of the United States Air Force.
    Check out our new shop for fun The History Guy merchandise:
    thehistoryguy-shop.fourthwall...
    This is original content based on research by The History Guy. Images in the Public Domain are carefully selected and provide illustration. As very few images of the actual event are available in the Public Domain, images of similar objects and events are used for illustration.
    You can purchase the bow tie worn in this episode at The Tie Bar:
    www.thetiebar.com/?...
    All events are portrayed in historical context and for educational purposes. No images or content are primarily intended to shock and disgust. Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Non censuram.
    Find The History Guy at:
    Patreon: / thehistoryguy
    Facebook: / thehistoryguyyt
    Please send suggestions for future episodes: Suggestions@TheHistoryGuy.net
    The History Guy: History Deserves to Be Remembered is the place to find short snippets of forgotten history from five to fifteen minutes long. If you like history too, this is the channel for you.
    Subscribe for more forgotten history: / @thehistoryguychannel .
    Awesome The History Guy merchandise is available at:
    thehistoryguy-shop.fourthwall...
    Script by THG
    #history #thehistoryguy #USAF

ความคิดเห็น • 293

  • @mjordan812
    @mjordan812 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +68

    I flew in a C-124 from Tinker AFB to SeaTac in late '66 on my way to Shemya. It was the loudest, most unpleasant airplane that I have ever flown in.

    • @krautyvonlederhosen
      @krautyvonlederhosen 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      It was specifically designed as a cargo aircraft and a far cry from the C-54s they were intended to replace. Riding in the bowels of a C-130 is no cakewalk but again, the “C” designation says it all.

    • @mjordan812
      @mjordan812 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      @@krautyvonlederhosen Been in a C-130 too (Ramstein to Aviano). Orders of magnitude better than the 124.
      I will admit, however, that Business Class in a 777 is MUCH better than either. 😁

    • @krautyvonlederhosen
      @krautyvonlederhosen 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@mjordan812 It’s been years since my time spent w/Sealift command in and around Diego Garcia but it was still time well spent and wouldn’t trade it for the world. It just adds up to who and what I am today. Though I ended up in Texas prison system, that doesn’t necessarily define me, though my soon to be ex wife might not agree.

    • @jackhames3874
      @jackhames3874 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@mjordan812I flew in a couple 130’s in Afghanistan and Kuwait, my first time ever riding in one was without seats. I just sat on the floor of the cargo bay, we all had to hold on to each other so as to not roll down to the end of the aircraft on takeoff 😂

    • @videointercepter
      @videointercepter 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      My dad was stationed at Shemya in the late 50's as an Air Force MP. His top secret clearance prevented his from telling us kids stories.

  • @TheQuickSilver101
    @TheQuickSilver101 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +70

    We all know that governments love their secrets but when does it end? If a government actually works for the people there needs to be a point when such secrets are revealed. Thanks for bringing this out of the shadows, History Guy!

    • @adamwhite3584
      @adamwhite3584 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The government doesn't work for the "People" that ended in Heely Plaza, 1963

  • @user-mj7nt7yf4g
    @user-mj7nt7yf4g 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

    Your episodes are always interesting, but what continues to impress me most is that while the episodes often involve incidents, you always manage to close them with the names of those involved. They may be incidents, but to the families of those involved, its the memories of the names of the fallen that are of paramount importance. History isn't incidents, its people.

  • @NuttySquirrel_8
    @NuttySquirrel_8 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

    This whole thing is bizarre. What could possibly be so sensitive 70 years later that the incident isn't declassified?

    • @charlestaylor253
      @charlestaylor253 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you...

    • @ABrit-bt6ce
      @ABrit-bt6ce 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      As a rule, someone high up and guilty is still alive or the consequences of publishing it are too damaging.

    • @Lost-In-Blank
      @Lost-In-Blank 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      @@ABrit-bt6ce Agreed. It is now 70 years ago, and that someone was working at the time. So 90+ years of age now. They'd be long retired. There could be no material damage to their reputation, at most only hurt feelings and embarrassment. _I think we can all agreed that the public's right to know the truth should be paramount over the reputation and feelings of people now retired._
      And in particular in the cases of the continuing secrecy over Rudolf Hess and JFK.
      These are not state secrets to protect our countries, they are secrets to protect important families or organizations that have committed some scandal that the public would be angry about even 70 years later. _For JFK and Hess, we know with certainty there is a great scandal, we just do not know exactly what it was._
      In the C-124 crash, we really do not even remotely know what it was. Anything to do with the Cold War would now be disclosed. Anything personal, to do with extra-marital affairs or smuggling, the rest of the details would be disclosed by now, even if by a general. Are the British keeping it secret? The Canadians?

    • @sanjayrao77
      @sanjayrao77 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      I'm not disagreeing but what about careers of their children/grandchildren? Many figures ride their family reputation 90 years later. They might have a strong incentive to block disclosure and be in a position to do it.

    • @Lost-In-Blank
      @Lost-In-Blank 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @@sanjayrao77 Their families deserve the reputation they've earned, not a reputation based on hidding the incredible wrongs committed by past generations so horrible, so horrific, that they would matter 70 years later.

  • @RichardTucker-xu6ic
    @RichardTucker-xu6ic 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    My father was stationed in Gander, Newfoundland in 1941. He and the other waist gunner where bumped from the next flight to accommodate taking 2 extra officers to a base in Greenland. Their plane disappeared. My father put in for Sea Duty. My father's job on the plane was searching for German submarines in the North Atlantic as one of the 2 waist gunners.

  • @otpyrcralphpierre1742
    @otpyrcralphpierre1742 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    A mystery that will likely never be solved. Thank you, Lance.

  • @RetiredSailor60
    @RetiredSailor60 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    Good Friday morning History Guy and everyone watching. Happy 248th birthday to the US Navy...Started my 21 year Naval career 41 years ago today

    • @matthewellisor5835
      @matthewellisor5835 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Cheers to the members of Uncle Sam's Canoe Club.

    • @navret1707
      @navret1707 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I retired 35 years ago after, like you, 21 years. Fly Navy. 🇺🇸

    • @Chris_at_Home
      @Chris_at_Home 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@matthewellisor5835I was in the Navy 4 years and never went to sea.

    • @Snailmailtrucker
      @Snailmailtrucker 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thank you Brother !

  • @MightyMezzo
    @MightyMezzo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    This makes me think of the crash of a Northwest Orient DC4 into Lake Michigan in 1950. Although they found some fragments of airplane and humans, the wreck has never been located. And Lake Michigan is a lot smaller than the Atlantic.
    Good video. Would be nice if they found the plane wreckage, but then again it took over 70 years to find the Titanic.

  • @Mike-tg7dj
    @Mike-tg7dj 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    By the early 1960s the C-124 Globemasters were in Air National Guard inventories. Our elementary school went to the air guard base to see these monsters of the skies. I think the thing that impressed me on our tour of aircraft was that long ladder that went up to cockpit. That was scary to climb for a fifth grader but, I did it.

  • @mariovuksanovic5077
    @mariovuksanovic5077 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This narrator is one of the best today.

  • @donalddodson7365
    @donalddodson7365 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    It is said that all wars, including "cold wars," have casualties. And, "The first casualty of war is truth."

  • @Farmer-bh3cg
    @Farmer-bh3cg 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    I suggest Occam's Razor: All things considered, the simplest answer is the most likely. The aircraft suffered a catastrophic accident that overwhelmed the aircrew's ability to even send a distress call.

    • @ClausB252
      @ClausB252 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Simplest answer? Aliens!

    • @Farmer-bh3cg
      @Farmer-bh3cg 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks; You gave me a good chuckle! @@ClausB252

    • @BeachsideHank
      @BeachsideHank 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ClausB252 Simpler still, a mass suicide pact- I didn't say plausible, just simpler.

    • @bower31
      @bower31 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don't think it works in this cade because the USAF wouldn't be so cagey about the details if it was so simple. They've admitted to far worse negligence accidents

  • @tomsherwood4650
    @tomsherwood4650 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    At first I was thinking this was about the plane that vanished in Canada with no trace. I was once on a plane that was leaking fuel from the wing over the Atlantic. I spotted it and informed crew. I got to think that it was fortunate that I did notice that happening.

  • @love2read241
    @love2read241 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This is one of the best mysteries that you have ever conveyed. This could be an incredible movie!

  • @Henchman1977
    @Henchman1977 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    Burning wreckage in high swells could look a lot like flares being fired off.

  • @jimtalbott9535
    @jimtalbott9535 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The part early on about “burning cargo” is fairly telling, IMO. Occam’s Razor says the simplest explanation is the most likely one. Badly packed cargo, maybe a mechanical failure that ignited other materials - I have an uncle that earned his second “caterpillar” badge having to bail out of a B-52 over Tracy California, due to an alternator fire combined with a fuel leak.

  • @Snailmailtrucker
    @Snailmailtrucker 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I flew on a few C-124 GlobeMasters back in the 1960s. The last one I remember was when I was on a 100 day TDY from Vandenberg AFB Calif. to Johnston Island (about 800 miles South West of Hawaii). The C-124 flight was from Hickham AFB Hawaii to JI ! I loved flying on these old planes back...this particular C-124 didn't need any windows in the fuselage as you could see outside thru the missing Rivets in the skin of the plane !
    On the old Flying Boxcars C-119 they gave us Parachutes when we had to fly on them ! *FUN STUFF !*

  • @JohnThreeSixteen918
    @JohnThreeSixteen918 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Similarly, South African Airways 747 named the Helderberg, crashed into the ocean near Mauritius in the early 1980's, after reporting a devastating and high intensity fire on board. Some hold that it carried rocket fuel, and that it was channeled to South Africa from Taipei to circumvent international arms embargoes. The official explanation blames it on computer batteries. Still shrouded in mystery... no survivors...

  • @bw162
    @bw162 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    How about Malaysia 370. Even with all the modern equipment available, they haven’t found it. And it took over a year to find the wreckage of Air France 447 in 2009. The USS Yorktown wasn’t found until 1998. Crossing the ocean then wasn’t a lot different than when Lindbergh did it. Even as late as the 1960s, Boeing 707s were still using cockpit sextants for transoceanic navigation. If you go to the Ronald Reagan museum, the Boeing 707 AF One has the glass dome in the cockpit ceiling for the use of a handheld sextant.

  • @mejurgensen
    @mejurgensen 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    With regard to the C-124 in general, there's an excellent scene of them being loaded with personnel and equipment, including a semi fuel truck, in the film Strategic Air Command.

  • @spikebebop9070
    @spikebebop9070 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Your site is one of my favorites. Your videos are well researched and informative as well as being hellaciously entertaining. Thank you for your work, sir.

  • @tomsherwood4650
    @tomsherwood4650 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Probably the reason the mission was secret was that anything to do with strategic policy that might deal with where nukes were based, would have been hush hush at that time. As for crew worries, don't know.

  • @randelbrooks
    @randelbrooks 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    A good friend of mine was a weapon year for the Mark five nuclear bomb at that time and had delivered five such weapons to Britain at the start of the Korean War and that plane may have been bringing some of the technical personnel. The timing is just right for that. I shot a video interview with my friend about the whole incident and yes it was top-secret at the time.

    • @Lost-In-Blank
      @Lost-In-Blank 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Good theory, but haven't other broken arrow incident, even from the 1960s, been largely declassified since 2000?

    • @paperburn
      @paperburn 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      lost bombs can stay classified up to 75 years@@Lost-In-Blank

  • @joshglover9602
    @joshglover9602 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Only THG can make payday even better! Happy Friday friends and a dear thank you to THG, always love and appreciate your videos

  • @LarryLeeMoniz
    @LarryLeeMoniz 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Thank you for this awesome bonus video. I hope you have a great, well deserved vacation!

  • @josephwarra5043
    @josephwarra5043 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    "A rapid engine disassembly, followed by a controlled flight into terrain which rendered the crew and passengers non-viable."

    • @CosRacecar
      @CosRacecar 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Downplayed like a true salesman

    • @dough9512
      @dough9512 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I read this in The Air Force Times when I was in elementary school (in the 1950's) - my dad was stationed at Offutt AFB: pilot describing a plane crash: "When I landed, my air speed was too great and I over-shot the end of the runway. I went over the perimeter road, thru the base fence, and into a clump of trees where both wings were torn off. Then I lost control."

    • @CosRacecar
      @CosRacecar 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dough9512 Ah, you found it! The Controlled Landing Into Terrain!

  • @richb313
    @richb313 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thanks for brining this to our attention having served on subs in the Navy I am well aware of the comapartmented classification system reading any govt. report requires a special understanding to glean any useful information from them.

  • @blazerocker1734
    @blazerocker1734 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    A U.S. Air Force plane out of Roswell New Mexico goes missing in the early 1950s.
    Yeah, I have an idea why the government wouldn't want to divulge any information about the fate of that plane and those aboard. I'm sure a lot of other people do too.

  • @ernesthill4017
    @ernesthill4017 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Nice that he included the names of The Lost 😢

  • @-jeff-
    @-jeff- 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thank you for updating this aerial "who done it." Sounds great now.

  • @johnathansaegal3156
    @johnathansaegal3156 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    That B-29 might have been ordered to destroy the plane if it were found to be afloat. Whatever was on the plane, that bomber was ordered to make sure it was sent to the bottom of the sea.

  • @BasicDrumming
    @BasicDrumming 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I appreciate you and thank you for making content.

  • @constipatedinsincity4424
    @constipatedinsincity4424 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Hey History Guy 🤓and Classmates, have a safe and fun weekend!

  • @Allan_aka_RocKITEman
    @Allan_aka_RocKITEman 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video, HG...👍

  • @larryfromwisconsin9970
    @larryfromwisconsin9970 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I crossed the Atlantic in a C-130 cargo plane in 1987. We stopped at Gander for fuel. We stopped multiple times going on from England to Kenya. It was a long, uncomfortable flight.

  • @ernestoross
    @ernestoross 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Excellent reporting!

  • @boathousejoed1126
    @boathousejoed1126 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Why does everything start in Roswell?

  • @waltonwarrior7428
    @waltonwarrior7428 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Another great history lesson that I was not aware of. If memory serves I believe the author Clive Cussler wrote a novel based on the disappearance of this plane. I don’t recall the name of the book as I read it many years ago.

  • @thebestisyettocome4114
    @thebestisyettocome4114 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    You never know who's watching a TH-cam video?.
    Interesting story.

  • @shawnr771
    @shawnr771 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for the lesson.

  • @robinsattahip2376
    @robinsattahip2376 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I do not know why, I am still subscribed but TH-cam stopped sending me any notifications about The History Guy.

  • @FlyRiverFly
    @FlyRiverFly 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    After looking at all the names/ranks of the passengers on the flight, that looked like an inverted rank pyramid. That team was truly on a classified mission

  • @kl0wnkiller912
    @kl0wnkiller912 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Even if the soviets had planted a bomb and blew up/forced down the plane, it would be virtually impossible to plan for the plane to come down where a submarine would be waiting. Also, planting a bomb in a plane and figuring that there would be a good chance anyone would survive is quite a stretch at all. Bringing down a plane in the North Atlantic and expect anything short of a total loss is a very, very long shot. Likely that there may have been a nuke on the plane and it just crashed due to a mechanical failure. That is plausible and would explain the secrecy as the Air Force would not want it known that there was a loose nuke lying around. They may have picked up the nuke in Newfoundland and that would explain the shop and the obscure reference to the landing at all. IF the Soviets had heard that they had picked up a nuclear weapon anywhere it may have made the plane a target so they did not want it known. Makes sense to me.

    • @krautyvonlederhosen
      @krautyvonlederhosen 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Some likely scenarios. Yet, if Russians were behind any of it what would be the efficacy of keeping it secret? There is far too much contradicting info for this to be just another incident. I’m not a conspiracy theorist but some of this doesn’t pass the smell test.

  • @robertspeicher5047
    @robertspeicher5047 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Spent many hours working on the " Shakey". To see the very first version, a tail dragger.
    Flew from McQuire AFB to Travis AFB....I always liked working on them

  • @pesawatindonesia
    @pesawatindonesia 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Fantastic video 🤩🤩🤩

  • @frankgulla2335
    @frankgulla2335 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you, THG for highighting this mysterious crash and investigation. One has to wonder what the Gov't is thinking when they do such a bad job of lying to the public.

  • @paulfeist
    @paulfeist 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I'd believe something like the General was trying to defect before I believe they were transporting a nuclear weapon on a passenger carrying flight. Nukes, even in 1952, warranted a "VIP" flight with no other passengers not involved in the transport of a nuclear weapon.

  • @meritholdingllc123
    @meritholdingllc123 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +166

    I am of the mind that keeping something classified beyond 30 years is only to cover up misdeads or malfeasance, most likely on behalf of the CIA or FBI, but could just as easily be any other alphabet agency. They will either remain classified until long after the deaths of those involved or indefinitely.

    • @mauricedavis2160
      @mauricedavis2160 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Hello, welcome to how I think!!!🙏🤔

    • @FYMASMD
      @FYMASMD 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      CIA maybe, but the FBI?
      That’s a stretch for either.

    • @dragonace119
      @dragonace119 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@FYMASMD I agree the CIA would be a understandable suspicion due to some of the things they've done to even US citizens. FBI on the other hand is a bit of a stretch, they are more the Waco types.

    • @marvinellis1517
      @marvinellis1517 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Cover up .. most likely .

    • @thesmallerhalf1968
      @thesmallerhalf1968 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Never underestimate the sensitivity of the military when it comes to bad news and negative publicity. Even decades later it would be very embarrassing to have lost so many significant people and then come up with nothing much in explanation. You also have to consider the time in history and the fact that those in the military can be just as susceptible to conspiracy theories and speculation. I am sure there was fevered theories running about that the Soviets might have been behind it. As to the strange search response, it’s much more likely to be cock-up than anything else. As for all the conflicting accounts, it can be very difficult to identify their origins and efficacy. The message in a can? Very dubious, far more likely to have been an ill-considered prank than genuine.

  • @RevMikeBlack
    @RevMikeBlack 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Very interesting story. Maybe the plane just lost electrical systems and crashed. Regarding the personnel list, that's a whole lotta captains and colonels in one place (other than the officers club), especially to be riding in a cargo plane.

    • @scechal
      @scechal 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      My Uncle was Colonel Kenneth Gray, CFO SAC, on that flight. Yeah, my Aunt worked in government and still never got answers.

  • @highpath4776
    @highpath4776 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Interesting on South Ruislip, I think these are sort of an area of "country estate" houses - this one being in nw suburban London is a little smaller than those with large land but still from an era of building. Its quite a motor drive from Lakenheath (which was one of the USAF etc bases in East Anglia). Northolt would have been closer to use so I suppose seeing the facilities at , and needed, at Lakenheath would be useful to do.

  • @peteengard9966
    @peteengard9966 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    It could have been hauling some of the UFO wreckage from Roswell.

  • @petesmith8362
    @petesmith8362 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Fascinating !

  • @stanwolenski9541
    @stanwolenski9541 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I appreciate the listing of the names.

  • @krautyvonlederhosen
    @krautyvonlederhosen 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Knowing how government “intelligence” agencies operate especially recently, this truly smacks of B.S. I’m not a conspiracy theorist by any stretch, yet there is far too much redacted, hidden, and classified information regarding a missing Air Force cargo aircraft. Even one missing person is worth more than “embarrassing” knowledge about how a government might operate. I understand the need for secrecy, yet this is not about saving face any longer given the time since it occurred.

    • @charlestaylor253
      @charlestaylor253 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Agreed. This incident was, (and remains), a giant Air Farce Cluster Fornication and Unlawful Carnal Knowledge, for sure. However, our gubbermint has never had any respect whatsoever for either it's service personnel or the citizenry...🤬🤬🤬

    • @sc1338
      @sc1338 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly 70 years later secrets don’t matter.

  • @johncarter1137
    @johncarter1137 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The C-124 looks like it would have been a handful in a stiff crosswind.

  • @Ammo08
    @Ammo08 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I remember these flying over our house from the 164th Airlift Group of the Tennessee Air Guard base at the Memphis Airport. Loud, loud, loud...shook everything...THe December 1985 crash of an Arrow Air plane with numerous US military personnel on board is also suspicious..

    • @danielcobbins8861
      @danielcobbins8861 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There was a crash of a C-124, in Washington state, in December, 1952. The plane took off, bound for San Antonio, TX, early in the morning. It suddenly lurched to the left, and crashed. The air traffic controller, saw it happen and immediately called out fire and rescue. Yet, mechanical issues were not found for some reason. One of the surviving crew members, woke up from a coma, and yelled "Myra, I checked the power!" He slipped back into a coma.

  • @highpath4776
    @highpath4776 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    rules of life - never take on new work on a friday. never do anything on a week before, or containing a bank holiday.

  • @Litauen-yg9ut
    @Litauen-yg9ut 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    A sad situation... no matter what the truth is...

  • @user-fk1dv7qi4p
    @user-fk1dv7qi4p 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A lot of times people look at the negative side of what they feel they can't do. I always look on the positive side of what I can do.

  • @davidrennie8197
    @davidrennie8197 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Planes crossing towards Europe are often early due to prevailing winds/jet stream

  • @stellamcwick8455
    @stellamcwick8455 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I didnt mind the audio problems before but ill let this play through to feed the algorithm.

  • @constipatedinsincity4424
    @constipatedinsincity4424 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Back in the Saddle Again Naturally!

  • @michaelcurrie6008
    @michaelcurrie6008 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Just because you think there's a conspiracy doesn't mean there is not

  • @MarshOakDojoTimPruitt
    @MarshOakDojoTimPruitt 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thanks

  • @markpaul-ym5wg
    @markpaul-ym5wg 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Another thing to keep in mind was this is around the time general MacArthur was relieved of command by Truman. General MacArthur was going to drop nukes on the chinese,but was relieved of duty.The Korean War was in full swing during the loss of this aircraft.

  • @cameronmolt5649
    @cameronmolt5649 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I enjoy the aviation content.

  • @andrewcrowder4958
    @andrewcrowder4958 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    THG is the best.

  • @randya3423
    @randya3423 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent account.

  • @carlmontney7916
    @carlmontney7916 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Two important points I take from this video.
    Number one, dead men don't launch flares.
    Number two, the military has no qualms at all about lying to the people about certain things.
    This was a very well done and well presented video thank you for posting it.

  • @watchmanneil52776
    @watchmanneil52776 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I probably worked on most of the A & C models while stationed on Terceira Island, Lajes Field, Azores, Port. APO NY 09406 NY.
    What an experience! AFSC 42251, M.A. 'Mostly Anything!'
    Thanks for the memories!

  • @m0ondoggy
    @m0ondoggy 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My grandfather used to say these planes would vibrate so bad in flight that you could slide a piece of paper under your feet.

  • @neilperry2224
    @neilperry2224 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You the most wonderful remembrance towards the loss of the aircrew and their families and to the Air Force Members lost as well, sir.
    Does Bbr mean Bombardier?
    Could someone please help me with this as I enjoy working out the difference between the two airforces of the UK and the USA.

    • @Bob95051
      @Bob95051 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think that's a good guess. but it seems that such a crewmember would also have a rank. "BBR" is not a military rank abbreviation from a brief search. It does stand for "blank battlefield round" but that clearly doesn't apply.

  • @user-kb9lx1yv2b
    @user-kb9lx1yv2b 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What a superbly focused analysis and query on matter. Simplyba labor of love, fairness and intellectual curiosity. The most telling was at the last. Nuke(s) on board. Broken arrow.

  • @gearheadgregwi
    @gearheadgregwi 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    They picked up the saucer-man from The Thing. Seriously... the ocean is a big, big, place. We'll never know.

    • @charlestaylor253
      @charlestaylor253 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      In the 1958 film 'The Blob', a C-124 Globemaster was called in to air drop the otherwise-indestructible frozen alien blob in the Arctic wasteland. Just sayin'...😳

    • @gearheadgregwi
      @gearheadgregwi 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@charlestaylor253 cool... somebody else who's a 50s 60s scifi nut!!

  • @clearcreek69
    @clearcreek69 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is an interesting story & it reminds me of Malaysia Airlines flight 370

  • @rolandtamaccio3285
    @rolandtamaccio3285 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    ,,, saw one in Lackland or Sheppard AFB, in Texas, '65 . Calling it ungainly would be an optimistic compliment .

  • @garyolsen3409
    @garyolsen3409 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I flew on those when I was in the Air Force in the 60's. We called it 'Old Shakey'. Miserable experience and I always kissed the ground after we landed.

  • @laserbeam002
    @laserbeam002 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    In all likelyhood one or more passengers were carrying sensative information or something relating to the nuclear program but the plane crashed due to a malfunction and the wreckage was lost. I tend not to go in for the X-files conspiracy theories and such. Most times the truth is stairing people in the face but they can't or refuse to see it.

  • @greggweber9967
    @greggweber9967 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    15:10 Were the traces left from an earlier cargo?

  • @terryhollands2794
    @terryhollands2794 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    You know, often when I tell stories from the past, I start by saying, you know we live in a dirty world.

    • @navret1707
      @navret1707 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      My “old tales” usually start “Now this is no shit.”

    • @notahotshot
      @notahotshot 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So your stories tend to be autobiographical?

    • @terryhollands2794
      @terryhollands2794 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@notahotshot pretty much, either personal involvement or as witness. Primarily 1992 to 2012 roughly speaking.

  • @wesrrowlands8309
    @wesrrowlands8309 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It sounds like they know exactly where the plane ended up and sank but have some reason to hide it all. Given it's the cold war they no doubt were doing something shady like transporting something they probably weren't supposed to be due to some agreement.

  • @harryshultz4850
    @harryshultz4850 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Dad flew this as a flight engeneer all over the world

  • @coreydarr8464
    @coreydarr8464 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have been to Loring AF base!

  • @HoopTY303
    @HoopTY303 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Ok I get it now, re-post. For a minute I thought I was time-slipping again… again. You really need to stop re-posting before I’ve had my coffee.

  • @DGKED-td7mf
    @DGKED-td7mf 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love all the history. Unfortunately I'm taking a break from TH-cam because of too many commercials

  • @marks1638
    @marks1638 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Some of the comments and reports from observers are kind of funny and ignore the realities of those days. For instance, one comment about security at Loring AFB was particularly funny. If you've ever been on an Air Force SAC base, you'd know their Security is absolutely anal. I've lived much of my early life on SAC bases from 1950's thru the 80's as a dependent and Active duty. General Lemay was a total maniac when it came to security and even a minor breach was a demotion or the end of a career for enlisted and officers in the Air Police/Security Police (and Base Commanders). I've spent time on my belly on several occasions with a M16 pointed at me for minor paperwork issues trying to get on the flightline or service a B-52 (In the 70's and 80's). My father (a retired USAF Air Policeman) talked about having to physically take down several people during his career in SAC on flightline and base security from 1948-68 (both stateside and overseas).
    Additionally, if they went into the Atlantic in March their chances of survival in the frigid waters were very minimal after even a few minutes in the water. If they got on a raft and had some way to warm up a little, they might survive a few hours, but not much more. That's why dry suits, covered rafts, high calorie foods, water, and self-heating systems are installed in modern ships, oil rigs, and airplanes that frequently fly over those areas. Survival in the Atlantic is a rough and usually deadly proposition.
    Lastly any movement of Command (or nuclear weapons certified personnel), particularly in SAC was usually a classified event (due to security issues). My dad got on a flight one day at an overseas location (a routine flight to another overseas SAC base) and the Wing Commander and his entourage came on board. As my dad (armed Air Police) was operating as a classified courier that day, so he remained on the flight. Everyone else was sent to Base Ops and had to stay there until the plane arrived at its destination. It was part of a No Notice Command Inspection of another SAC base with his Wing Commander leading the team. He said it was first time he'd even been on the giving end of a No Notice Inspection and when they landed it was organized chaos on the receiving end of the inspection. So, SAC (and especially Lemay) is famous for last minute no notice movement of personnel (and equipment) and many times there's very little paperwork or proof it even happened. The only thing that made this one event well known was the plane crashed. I don't think there would be more than one or two pieces of paperwork (mainly the notice from SAC, a transit order, and the base ops logs) that would show it ever happened. The movement of General Cullen and his staff would have been classified and very little paperwork would have been generated (to prevent security leaks) until he was on the ground in England and setting up operations. Lemay expected his people to know their jobs and the procedures were already in place to set up operations.

    • @marks1638
      @marks1638 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I've got a scammer replying to me. He pulled this stuff on several other sites by pretending to be the site host.

  • @bobdevarney9433
    @bobdevarney9433 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You mentioned a "Canadian episode", can you tell more about this or a name? 21:11

  • @MrSurfingbudha
    @MrSurfingbudha 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    My dad was a pilot and he flew C-124. I think they called those Planes "Old Shakey" because when they took off they rattled your teeth. That was his favorite plane. When he retired he was flying the C-141s out of Charleston SC.

    • @suzanneflowers2230
      @suzanneflowers2230 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We still love our AFB in Charleston.

  • @ReaperRestorations
    @ReaperRestorations 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    they used to fly these out of my base after they got rid of the P-51's. one is preserved at Hill AFB museum. now we fly KC135's

  • @BulletproofPastor
    @BulletproofPastor 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When reasonable actions are wanting and recovery data conflicts, coupled with apparent lack of evident official concern, it yields ground to contemplate “accident of convenience.”

  • @garcia12773
    @garcia12773 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    im curious with modern mapping of the oceans has anyone seen any anomolies that may line up with this incidents location?

  • @mauricedavis2160
    @mauricedavis2160 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    HAPPY BIRTHDAY US NAVY 🎉👌⚓❣️

  • @louschultz8602
    @louschultz8602 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where can I find more info. on the military cargo plane that was recently found on a retreating glacier? It went missing about 1951 or ‘52?

  • @user-jk3to5jt9y
    @user-jk3to5jt9y 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So long as a person is capable of self-renewal they are a living being.

  • @Lost-In-Blank
    @Lost-In-Blank 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The continuing secrecy is the mystery. I'm old enough to remember that through the 1960s, aircraft regularly crashed on land over Canada, and locating the wreckage sometimes took until spring, sometimes never. Over water, aircraft in those days would not have had foam plastic, it would be so many metal parts sinking. The secrecy? An A-bomb? Did the general take his mistress? Something that mundane could have caused the initial secrecy. But not even a lost atomic bomb could have caused secrecy lasting more than 30 years, let alone 70+ years. That is the mystery, right, _the mystery is why the mystery has been maintained for over 70 years?_
    I'm not surprised an aircraft crashed in those days, or that no survivors, bodies, or significant wreckage were found; the technology was not available at the time to locate them in less than days, and metal parts sink. Look how difficult it was to locate Air France 447 after its 2009 crash. Or still lost Malaysian Flight 370.
    I hope those men did not suffer lingering deaths. And I dearly wish their relatives had been given proper answers once the need for _near total_ secrecy had passed.
    We need more government honesty. About this, (and about Rudolf Hess and JFK). _Such very very long-term secrecy should not be tolerated by elected officials,_ no matter that someone's feelings or big wig politician's or bureaucrat's family reputation is hurt by the truth coming out.

    • @jacksons1010
      @jacksons1010 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not much mystery about JFK or Rudolf Hess. Personal incredulity over the evidence doesn’t change the facts.

    • @Lost-In-Blank
      @Lost-In-Blank 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jacksons1010 Oh yeah, huge mystery of Hess and lots of papers still secret about JFK. So much evidence is hidden and admitted by authorities to be hidden.

  • @shawnmiller4781
    @shawnmiller4781 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The military have been removing remains from a C-124 that went down on Colony Glacier in Alaska near my house.
    I believe this year it’s been 10 years they have been doing recovery on the glacier and they have gotten half the people on board. At the time of the crash recovery wasn’t viewed as recoverable

  • @davidrennie8197
    @davidrennie8197 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The B50 was en route to escort the plane to an airfield, rather than carrying rescue equipment. Should have been a faster and more suitable response, yes - but the B50 was at the warning point for fuel level for safe return. It radioed the position of flares to weather ship Casco and over the next days several British planes searched as did the USS Coral Sea, other naval ships and submarines

  • @gordonfarrell6732
    @gordonfarrell6732 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My dad worked for the department of transport and flew all over quebec , labrador and the NWT . I am from a aviation family and remember my dad saying on a flight up north a call coming over the radio that an other plane had just spotted the globe master crashed in the tundra of quebec or labrador 😮 weird ...also there was an American airforce base in frobisher Bay ( iqaloit ) on baffin Island north of quebec may its really secret

  • @kennyhagan5781
    @kennyhagan5781 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm from Amarillo and I haven't heard this story in decades.
    The people that I heard about this from were mostly college students and it was in the 70s. The only conclusion that any of them could reach was that the CIA did something to cover something up...not exactly helpful but at least it made for a really entertaining evening.
    Thanks, that is a good memory that I haven't examined in years.

  • @markedis5902
    @markedis5902 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Another odd thing is that RAF Lakenheath is nowhere near to South Ruislip. RAF Northolt is just round the corner.

    • @randya3423
      @randya3423 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      True but not all RAF bases had the security, facilities or runways capable of handling large aircraft.