*For anyone wondering where the 4D remake can be watched:* *You can view the full 10 minute film on the special features of the Rudolph DVD or Blu-ray (2018 Release). Here's a link or you can get it at your local Walmart. -* www.amazon.com/Rudolph-Red-Nosed-Reindeer-Burl-Ives/dp/B07GRCZW5T/ref=asc_df_B07GRCZW5T/?tag=hyprod-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=312239736139&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=5037725146034076592&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=m&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9028727&hvtargid=pla-566835334260&psc=1
The original version didn't show Santa delivering the Misfit Toys, the first time it aired. There were so many complaints from people asking what happened to them, that the closing credits were completely redone for the 1965 airing. Billie Mae Richards' name was misspelled in them.
I believe the original broadcast ended immediately after the Peppermint mine scene. On current home media releases the two endings are spliced together. It's so extremely well done, that you can't even tell that they were originally two separate conclusions. I want the original full color credits on gift boxes restored, and THEN we will have the "true" version of the special.
@@ronratcliffe2219 You got it backwards, Misfits is the original song, it was used in the 1964 broadcast, The 1965-'97 airings replaced it with Fame And Fortune. Misfits was restored to the special in 1998. I
@@ronratcliffe2219I totally agree that "Misfits" fits the story better. It explains why Hermey's and Rudolph's Misfit solos are so brief, it was a buildup to a full fledged musical number. When I heard the restored Misfit song for the first time, it all made sense from then on. Now hopefully the original gift box closing in full color can be found and finally we'll have the "real" version of the Rudolph Special.
Three of the original "Rudolph" voices lived at the Performing Arts Lodge in my neighbourhood: Billie Mae Richards, Paul Soles, and Alfie Scopp. Billie died several years ago. We lost Paul and Alfie in the past year. They were the last two surviving cast members. None of the cast got a penny in residuals since 1969, because standard contracts in the 1960s only lasted for 5 years. Nobody imagined "Ruudolph" would still be commercially viable (and extremely lucrative) for 57 years...and counting.
Both Corinne Conley (Misfit Doll/ Rudolph's mom) and Carl Banas (Head Elf) are still around, at the end of 2021. And also, producer Jules Bass is still with us.
Patte, agreed that it's a bummer that the residuals petered out fairly rapidly. But as you say, no on expected anything more past those five years. However, I like to think "Rudolph" still paid dividends by giving the voice talent a 'calling card' that they could use for many years to get more gigs.
What I love about the original stop-motion animation specials & movies... they are flawed, they can be corny, they can be jerky, you can see the artificial "otherness" of the scene and movement. What I love about "perfect", smoothed out and too many frames per second new stop-motion animation... that people are so awe-struck by the old animation that they are still tinkering with it half a lifetime later. Other than that, I applaud that they are paying tribute to a classic from true geniuses of our time, but I'll stick with the originals. Thanks!
I was 9 years old when I first watched it back in 1964. The show is very dear to me as well. I watched it on Christmas Eve.. Brought back beautiful memories' of Christmas's from a long time ago. When my beautiful parents, Grandmothers, Aunts & Uncles, etc. I was 4 years old when my Dads dad passed, and My Moms Dad passed before I was born. Im sure I'll meet them all in Heaven one day.. ✝💒🧡🎶🎅🏿
I was born five years after Rudolph first aired, and have watched it every year of my life since. It's the reason I got a super 8mm camera, projector, and editing machine when I was 11 years old. It's also the main reason I got into the animation industry. It's a classic that can never be touched. It is perfection. It is magical, and its charm is a direct result of its flaws. While I can appreciate the technology that went into this project, I think it would have been better suited putting those efforts into something fresh and new. You simply don't mess with classics. It looks nice, but it will never look or sound like Rudolph. It's just a slick imposter that no one asked for. Kids today deserve the same Rudolph we grew up on. The same one that inspired these great artists in the first place. That is the magic of Rudolph.
I grew up with these being on in holiday rotation in the 80s. I've always thought they were fun, even as a kid I didn't feel these were "sacrosanct" specials.. to me they were just "what was on" during the holidays... and personally I preferred the Peanuts xmas special over these. I get the nostalgia we have over them.. the designs.. the quirky wonkiness of the animation... etc.. but times have changed. The imperfections that we grew up with and find endearing probably won't play to the kids you want to impress today, and modern airings probably wouldn't respect the 4X3 aspect ratio of old tv shows.. so youd get a badly cropped widescreen hack job if it. Look at it this way... the old versions will still be there... but if noting else.. this is keeping the tradition and spirit of it going, just in widescreen 4K.
@@DanJackson1977 - " but times have changed. The imperfections that we grew up with and find endearing probably won't play to the kids you want to impress today" _________________________________ I think you grossly underestimate the interests, gratefulness, and imagination of the minds of children. Technology has changed, but the human mind and its quest for entertainment, no matter how raw or refined, has not. If what you are trying to imply were true, these shows wouldn't still be airing every year (in their original 4x3 aspect ratio), almost sixty years later. th-cam.com/video/m3bJxsASyOQ/w-d-xo.html
The original still exists. As long as they aren't trying to make it seem like their version is the only one, it's fine. I implore studios to remake things because if they aren't up to snuff against the original, they'll lose money and won't do it anymore
Thank you for keeping it pure. Fond, fond memories of Rudolph and the gang. Watch it every year, since the mid 1960’s. Classic iconic American Christmas story.
The original remains a true Christmas time classic. A very special holiday special! Although I am glad to see that it is still being kept in the public eye by whatever it takes to do so. The 4D version looks good as well. Although the original version will always be the one dear to me since childhood all the way up to this very day.
I would have preferred you kept the original Burl Ives voice. You didn't change the dialog, so it would have been truer to the original to have included him. He's just as beloved as the others. He's the one telling the story.
I get why they redid that. Because they added scenes they have to redo all the voices. Burl Ives was recorded using analog 60s equipment so switching between his voice and others would break the illusion. Plus there’s the legal issues of using a dead man’s voice in a new production.
IT'S NUTS the amount of time and detail going in to each frame! To even know how many frames it will take to go from one position to the next in relationship to a script or story... It's hurts my brain thinking about it.
Well, the "first" version was NOT the 1964 special. Rather, it was a 1948 theatrical cartoon short by Max Fleischer. But it's a very different premise, entirely different from the version most people know. Here it is th-cam.com/video/AwSZqe9HMj0/w-d-xo.html
Spyro reignited REMAKE, despite what Twitter, fake fans calling themselves real ones, and sellouts say, isn't better than the original. Should have made something actually new and original.
I was six years old when this came out and even now it just doesn't seem like Christmas unless we watch Rudolph along with the other classic 1960's holiday programs.
Such a great job! Loving what I’m seeing here as much as the original. ❤️ I really appreciate how true you all stayed to this as well as added a little bit more magic to it.
Just saw this in a 4D theatre at a zoo lights event. In addition to the 3D, there is wind, mist, blowing snow and rumbles under your seat. The kids in the theatre loved it. I grew up with the original, and this is a fun version, especially with the other effects.
I can well remember, sitting down during the holiday season in 1964 and watching Rudolph air for the first time. Please.... DO NOT MESS with this wonderful, sweet classic! Always remember, just because you CAN does not mean you SHOULD! I will be 60 next year..... and I haven't missed watching Rudolph in 56 years!
I appreciate the talent, effort, and dedication of these folks, but the Rankin/Bass version is better. Maybe I'm just a purist, but the 4D version just looks too CGI for my liking. UPDATE: I can't believe I have to edit this to clarify a simple opinion. I am fully aware that this is in no way CGI. I only used that term for lack of a better one. To me, and this is only MY opinion, it has that over computer-generated CGI-ish feel to it. I like it for it's artistic value and the obvious dedication to the OG. It's just that, personally, I happen to prefer the OG. Thanks for all the likes ❤️🦌
Thank you for keeping it alive for future generations. IN the world we live in today, children need an escape to help them remain children for as long as the can. God bless you.
There's a TH-cam video about the Rankin Bass "Animagic World" with current creative people expressing their praise and personal feelings about the studio. One guy expresses his thought on stop-motion vs CGI that I agree with: With CGI, no matter how real it looks, it will always be fake. No matter how fake stop-motion looks, it's always real.
I'm disappointed it's only 10 minutes long. I thought the entire film had been done to ensure preservation. I view it as a National Treasure & believe it possible to obtain the funding to recreate it in it's entirety. I do realize the hours of work to do so are unbelievable long...& I appreciate what you've accomplished and your love for the story . Merry Christmas 🎅 and Happy Holidays
As a child in the sixties, Rudolph and some other Christmas favorites were magical. I remember looking forward to receiving the Sears Wish Book each year. Keep up the good work and God Bless.
I worked at Dollywood the first year they introduced these characters to the park and it was like living in a childhood dream seeing the bumble in the park.
I was so excited at first as I thought this was an entire remake of the original. It took some searching to figure out it's just a ten minute bit. Someone fund the whole movie!
I much prefer the originals. These are vintage productions, and this kind of tinkering takes all the vintage feel away from them. They're not SUPPOSED to be high-tech - it's part of their charm, and part of the sense they come from a past when technology wasn't so overwhelmingly important. It strips them of the sense of tradition because they look just like everything else kids see at the movies. This reminds me of that awful trend of colorizing classic black-and-white movies, believing that it automatically made them "better".
I agree. Some of the updated shots I see here are missing a ton of detail and appear way too CGI even though they are not. The voice acting done on the original is also way more realistic and timeless. Especially Burl Ives.
Totally agree with you as well... This 're-creation' doesn't intrigue one bit. I, and many others, will always prefer the original for those reasons you listed and more. Why try and supposedly (according to the new creators) 'improve' something like this anyways.. ?? It was brilliant as it originally was and it's still brilliant to this day... I have NO interest in watching a 4D re-imagining of this classic.
@@benkleschinsky You can't get much better than that! "Holly Jolly Christmas" became a classic, and Ives was a superb actor as well as a legendary singer. Remember "Big Daddy"? Who else could have portrayed him so savagely, and yet still with an underlying sense of humanity?
It’s not just that but what bothers me are the puppets themselves… they feel more like a parody than the original puppets… ESPECIALLY You’d think they could of LITERALLY studied the actual film and got the puppet characters down perfect… But no… they feel more like bootlegged versions of the original puppets… You’ve seen some Rudolph stop motion commercials like LITERALLY the Aflac commercial (ESPECIALLY), and that SNL parody of Rudolph from 2001 captured the original character puppets better than this, but I think the Aflac one so far was the closest we ever got to the original puppet characters than this, which is sad how a 15 year old commercial captures these characters than a 15 year later project like this where the characters feel like bootleg versions of themselves… but honestly if they really wanted to they could capture the original characters dead on to the originals… They just never tried yet…
@@princesspeachfan100 There is a reason for this. Most of the original puppets were destroyed in a fire. Rudolph was lost, but later found in an attic years later. I believe that he and one other puppet are the last remaining props from the original film. He’s actually in a museum somewhere, now. I think that the original film artifacting adds a lot to the original as well. There’s just texture there that just can’t be replicated anymore.
To Rankin Bass, et al, I can remember watching this epic production in 1964. It was something else. Fifty-seven years later, I still watch this show… now, with my grandchildren! I must humbly thank everyone for sharing this wonderful item throughout the years.
The last time I saw Rudolph, I wondered if they kept the audio and re-animated the visuals, how cool would that be? But now that I saw a glimpse of it, I have mixed feelings. Being an animation buff, I sense the reasons for the remake were about a challenging technical exercise, and for a very personal labor-of-love project with an homage to their heroes at Rankin Bass. It was not about replacing a classic. But which version of Rudolph do you want your five-year-old daughter to see for the first time --- the classic, or the new one --- and do you show her the other one next year? In defense of the original, I noticed tiny flaws that I always enjoyed, like how dirty Santa's fingers were (because of the animators' dirty fingers handling the characters), how Hermie's mouth is gone while standing under the Bumble, and how the reindeer shadows disappeared off the cave wall they moment the characters exited out of the camera's view. I'm just glad you kept the sky green!
The original is definitely the definitive classic (haha), but this 4-D one was pretty neat to see at my local aquarium, seeing it in 3D plus all of the gusts of cold wind, splashes of water and falling snow, etc. And it was great to see it so clear, but I will always re-watch the original at holiday time.
I haven't watched this 4D version yet but I'm going to here in a few. I just wanted to say, and this is just my opinion, that the little mistakes or maybe I should say odd things you see in the original version like the fur on the puppets moving around between frames and little things like that are what make stop motion animation that much more interesting. I didn't really understand what stop motion animation was back in the early 70s when I first started watching Rudolph but I could tell that I saw strange fur and clothing manipulation movements from frame to frame which made me think, hmmmmmmmm, I wonder what that is 🤔? To me it makes it more interesting. When it's done too perfectly without any of those imperfect details I think it makes it much more sterile and boring in a way. It's kinda like noticing little things in say for instance the original Star Trek series. You'd see imperfections in several costumes or maybe the way makeup and the like were applied and how they used what looked exactly like Redhots candy in a medicine bottle or jar and that's probably what they were, Redhot candy. Another interesting thing I noticed, among others, was when Captain Kirk would get his cup of coffee and sit in his Captain's chair, the cup looked just like a regular Styrofoam Dixie cup spray painted silver. These are the little details that I think makes certain shows and/or movies 🎥 more interesting and we all know it's make believe but we want to believe it's real even for just a little while and the small flaws among other things that we recognize from home gives it a down to earth feeling at the same time.
Your 4D version was great I hope in the near future you can make a 4D version of another Rankin Bass classic like Mad Monster Party and a Year without a Santa 🎅, and The Ballard of Smokey the 🐻.
I love the faithfulness to the source material but also the little innovations and changes that were added, especially in some of the shot compositions or the character performances. Awesome stuff. Would be a dream come true to see this being created or even work on it.
I'm sure it's nice, but I will always be particular to the original. It's about good memories for me. I like knowing my grandchildren will get to see these little movies too some day. I don't do good with change anyway, so maybe I shouldn't have left a comment. Oh well, Merry Christmas.
wow this will be awesome to see that. that is amazing how you all put this together. I grew up watching it too. I hope this hits theaters next Christmas or on DVD. I love to see that new Reimagining of it. you all did awesome on it to keep it like the classical awesome and amazing too.
That's a good point about digital recording, and isn't that incredible to realize? It was all originally shot on film. The cinematographers and animators had no idea what they had captured until after it was developed. It was snap a shot and hope for the best.
Haven't seen it but have to question SHOWING Bumble bouncing (looked like they showed it as it happened). Part of the power of not seeing it is that we think they died and are wowed and overjoyed when they return at the end. Guess I'll have to hope...
The Stop Motion Animals is so creative AND time consuming!! lol Kevin Parry has been an amazing stop motion creator within the last 10 years! Love to see the behind the scenes look of the making of this, just with they showed how the characters were made,..
I really liked it and I think that they stayed so true to the original that they paid homage to it and I think that Arthur Rankin junior and Jules Bass would be honored and amazed at how for their industry has come and how beloved all of them were. I would love to know where I can buy the full DVD of this to add to my collection because I think it would be a wonderful addition.
@@bryantkeller9278 I watched a different video where they discussed the nose. The original was incandescent (it was the 60s after all) and made so much heat it slowly damaged the puppet over time. So they had to install an LED.
Something they might not have thought of - the old version has characters facing the audience a bit when they're speaking to each other, and the new version has them facing them straight on. At least in that one scene on here when Santa is speaking to Rudolf.
I love it in 1964 I was 2 years old. I’m not sure when I first saw it. For many years I always watch this movie and also the another movie like Santa is coming to town. Now renew with 4 D is great idea.
I should literally get the complete original Christmas Classics collection (Sony Wonder) on DVD which includes the original Christmas Classics (Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer, Santa Claus is Coming to Town, Mr. Magoo's Christmas Carol, etc) and also Sesame Street: Elmo Saves Christmas
I watched Rudolph today and felt my 4K TV couldn't bring out the colors well because of the vintage look. Even after tinkering with the contrast of the TV itself it felt washed out and didn't look right on a modern TV. So I think this might bring it back to life for those with the modern TV screens that don't bring out the full beauty of the film.
*For anyone wondering where the 4D remake can be watched:* *You can view the full 10 minute film on the special features of the Rudolph DVD or Blu-ray (2018 Release). Here's a link or you can get it at your local Walmart. -* www.amazon.com/Rudolph-Red-Nosed-Reindeer-Burl-Ives/dp/B07GRCZW5T/ref=asc_df_B07GRCZW5T/?tag=hyprod-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=312239736139&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=5037725146034076592&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=m&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9028727&hvtargid=pla-566835334260&psc=1
thats not a link for the 4d version it seems...
@@jamessancimino it's on the bonus features of that DVD.
@@Animagic_Style_2016 There's a new release of these films does it have the bonus clip?
It's only 10 minutes? 0.0
*Makes me wonder what you could do with Captain Scarlet, and/or Thunderbirds are Go from Gerry Anderson.* 👍👍👏
But NOBODY sings like Burl Ives. That cannot be duplicated.
I don't think any of the original voice cast could be properly replaced. This remake unintentionally proves that.
@@Animagic_Style_2016 so true. That's the one thing I noticed
@@Animagic_Style_2016 I'll give the new voice actors an A for effort but you're absolutely right the original cast could never be properly replaced.
I agree. Burl was one of the greatest folksingers of all time, and Billie Mae Richards was perfect as Rudolph.
You got that right.😊🎄❤
The original version didn't show Santa delivering the Misfit Toys, the first time it aired. There were so many complaints from people asking what happened to them, that the closing credits were completely redone for the 1965 airing. Billie Mae Richards' name was misspelled in them.
I believe the original broadcast ended immediately after the Peppermint mine scene. On current home media releases the two endings are spliced together. It's so extremely well done, that you can't even tell that they were originally two separate conclusions. I want the original full color credits on gift boxes restored, and THEN we will have the "true" version of the special.
1964 airing , the voice over was done on Mutual Street at the studios in Toronto .
@@ronratcliffe2219 You got it backwards, Misfits is the original song, it was used in the 1964 broadcast, The 1965-'97 airings replaced it with Fame And Fortune.
Misfits was restored to the special in 1998.
I
@@ronratcliffe2219I totally agree that "Misfits" fits the story better. It explains why Hermey's and Rudolph's Misfit solos are so brief, it was a buildup to a full fledged musical number.
When I heard the restored Misfit song for the first time, it all made sense from then on. Now hopefully the original gift box closing in full color can be found and finally we'll have the "real" version of the Rudolph Special.
Yup in those closing credits, they still throw the bird that couldn't fly to his death.
Three of the original "Rudolph" voices lived at the Performing Arts Lodge in my neighbourhood: Billie Mae Richards, Paul Soles, and Alfie Scopp.
Billie died several years ago. We lost Paul and Alfie in the past year. They were the last two surviving cast members.
None of the cast got a penny in residuals since 1969, because standard contracts in the 1960s only lasted for 5 years. Nobody imagined "Ruudolph" would still be commercially viable (and extremely lucrative) for 57 years...and counting.
Carl Banas still living as of Nov. 2021...
they brought so much joy and love to the world, God Bless Them
Mutual Street in Toronto ???
Both Corinne Conley (Misfit Doll/ Rudolph's mom) and Carl Banas (Head Elf) are still around, at the end of 2021. And also, producer Jules Bass is still with us.
Patte, agreed that it's a bummer that the residuals petered out fairly rapidly. But as you say, no on expected anything more past those five years. However, I like to think "Rudolph" still paid dividends by giving the voice talent a 'calling card' that they could use for many years to get more gigs.
What I love about the original stop-motion animation specials & movies... they are flawed, they can be corny, they can be jerky, you can see the artificial "otherness" of the scene and movement. What I love about "perfect", smoothed out and too many frames per second new stop-motion animation... that people are so awe-struck by the old animation that they are still tinkering with it half a lifetime later. Other than that, I applaud that they are paying tribute to a classic from true geniuses of our time, but I'll stick with the originals. Thanks!
It's NOT smoothed out though. Clearly you didn't watch.
This show is very dear to me. I was 7 years old when I first saw it on TV... I'll be 64 in two weeks. Thank you for keeping it alive!
I was 8...I'll be 60 in 6 months. :) Haven't missed a year since 2nd grade when someone said "Did you see Rudolph last night". No...what's that?
Me too!!! 64 in 4 days!
Sir, me too!
I was 9 years old when I first watched it back in 1964. The show is very dear to me as well. I watched it on Christmas Eve.. Brought back beautiful memories'
of Christmas's from a long time ago. When my beautiful parents, Grandmothers, Aunts & Uncles, etc. I was 4 years old when my Dads dad passed, and My Moms
Dad passed before I was born. Im sure I'll meet them all in Heaven one day.. ✝💒🧡🎶🎅🏿
I was born five years after Rudolph first aired, and have watched it every year of my life since. It's the reason I got a super 8mm camera, projector, and editing machine when I was 11 years old. It's also the main reason I got into the animation industry. It's a classic that can never be touched. It is perfection. It is magical, and its charm is a direct result of its flaws. While I can appreciate the technology that went into this project, I think it would have been better suited putting those efforts into something fresh and new. You simply don't mess with classics. It looks nice, but it will never look or sound like Rudolph. It's just a slick imposter that no one asked for. Kids today deserve the same Rudolph we grew up on. The same one that inspired these great artists in the first place. That is the magic of Rudolph.
I agree with you 100%. thanks for keeping it positive.
The OG 100/100
I grew up with these being on in holiday rotation in the 80s. I've always thought they were fun, even as a kid I didn't feel these were "sacrosanct" specials.. to me they were just "what was on" during the holidays... and personally I preferred the Peanuts xmas special over these. I get the nostalgia we have over them.. the designs.. the quirky wonkiness of the animation... etc.. but times have changed. The imperfections that we grew up with and find endearing probably won't play to the kids you want to impress today, and modern airings probably wouldn't respect the 4X3 aspect ratio of old tv shows.. so youd get a badly cropped widescreen hack job if it. Look at it this way... the old versions will still be there... but if noting else.. this is keeping the tradition and spirit of it going, just in widescreen 4K.
@@DanJackson1977 - " but times have changed. The imperfections that we grew up with and find endearing probably won't play to the kids you want to impress today"
_________________________________
I think you grossly underestimate the interests, gratefulness, and imagination of the minds of children. Technology has changed, but the human mind and its quest for entertainment, no matter how raw or refined, has not. If what you are trying to imply were true, these shows wouldn't still be airing every year (in their original 4x3 aspect ratio), almost sixty years later. th-cam.com/video/m3bJxsASyOQ/w-d-xo.html
The original still exists. As long as they aren't trying to make it seem like their version is the only one, it's fine. I implore studios to remake things because if they aren't up to snuff against the original, they'll lose money and won't do it anymore
Thank you for keeping it pure. Fond, fond memories of Rudolph and the gang. Watch it every year, since the mid 1960’s. Classic iconic American Christmas story.
The original remains a true Christmas time classic. A very special holiday special! Although I am glad to see that it is still being kept in the public eye by whatever it takes to do so. The 4D version looks good as well. Although the original version will always be the one dear to me since childhood all the way up to this very day.
Some things should be left alone
@@RJ1999x Good point!
For some reason, I still prefer the original. The new version looks good though.
I would have preferred you kept the original Burl Ives voice. You didn't change the dialog, so it would have been truer to the original to have included him. He's just as beloved as the others. He's the one telling the story.
I get why they redid that. Because they added scenes they have to redo all the voices. Burl Ives was recorded using analog 60s equipment so switching between his voice and others would break the illusion.
Plus there’s the legal issues of using a dead man’s voice in a new production.
Wait, that’s a thing? You can’t use the voice of deceased people in media? Explain please?
This is really refreshing to see a professional studio go back to this fine craft!!!
IT'S NUTS the amount of time and detail going in to each frame! To even know how many frames it will take to go from one position to the next in relationship to a script or story... It's hurts my brain thinking about it.
My wife and I are in our 60s and both have watched Rudolph since the beginning. We just watched it tonight, that takes care of 2021!
I’m sure this was a monumental effort, but I’ll keep the original thank you. It has a charm that computerized animation will never duplicate.
As Long as your respectful of the first version it could be wonderful. So many remakes just wreck it.
Well, the "first" version was NOT the 1964 special. Rather, it was a 1948 theatrical cartoon short by Max Fleischer. But it's a very different premise, entirely different from the version most people know. Here it is th-cam.com/video/AwSZqe9HMj0/w-d-xo.html
@@chrismulwee4911 Right, but I meant respectful of the 1964 version
Spyro reignited REMAKE, despite what Twitter, fake fans calling themselves real ones, and sellouts say, isn't better than the original. Should have made something actually new and original.
I'm a little upset that some of the voices have been changed. Especially Burl Ives singing Rudolph.
@@vshellcroft 1960s voice recordings was something really special. It's hard to replicate.
I was six years old when this came out and even now it just doesn't seem like Christmas unless we watch Rudolph along with the other classic 1960's holiday programs.
Such a great job! Loving what I’m seeing here as much as the original. ❤️ I really appreciate how true you all stayed to this as well as added a little bit more magic to it.
Just saw this in a 4D theatre at a zoo lights event. In addition to the 3D, there is wind, mist, blowing snow and rumbles under your seat. The kids in the theatre loved it. I grew up with the original, and this is a fun version, especially with the other effects.
That’s cool!
I can well remember, sitting down during the holiday season in 1964 and watching Rudolph air for the first time. Please.... DO NOT MESS with this wonderful, sweet classic! Always remember, just because you CAN does not mean you SHOULD! I will be 60 next year..... and I haven't missed watching Rudolph in 56 years!
We're never "misfits" when we reconnect with our saving Christmas and toys friends in every dimension.🎯❄🎄⭐ Merry Christmas and stay safe everyone!
I appreciate the talent, effort, and dedication of these folks, but the Rankin/Bass version is better. Maybe I'm just a purist, but the 4D version just looks too CGI for my liking.
UPDATE: I can't believe I have to edit this to clarify a simple opinion. I am fully aware that this is in no way CGI. I only used that term for lack of a better one. To me, and this is only MY opinion, it has that over computer-generated CGI-ish feel to it. I like it for it's artistic value and the obvious dedication to the OG. It's just that, personally, I happen to prefer the OG.
Thanks for all the likes ❤️🦌
I think I'm with you. It looks cool, but what's the point?
These people need to STOP reimagining classics like this. LEAVE THEM ALONE!
For me, it's the texture and lighting, and sometimes the shape of the characters. But it's fun to see how much they love the work they're doing.
@DixieBelle I agree, I prefer the original.
It's not CGI though.
I need to see this!!! I hope one day all the Rankin Bass shows will be released on 3D Blu-ray. 🙏🏻
Do you still have to have a 3D TV to be able to view it in 3D?
@@bodeine454 Yes!! 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
@@bodeine454 I do also and it would be very easy to view n the oculus quest!
@@volt8ge I'm not familiar with that but I believe I've heard of it before. I'll research it thanks.
Thank you for keeping it alive for future generations. IN the world we live in today, children need an escape to help them remain children for as long as the can. God bless you.
Why not watch the originals?
There's a TH-cam video about the Rankin Bass "Animagic World" with current creative people expressing their praise and personal feelings about the studio. One guy expresses his thought on stop-motion vs CGI that I agree with: With CGI, no matter how real it looks, it will always be fake. No matter how fake stop-motion looks, it's always real.
I have to watch this every year and I am in my 50’s.
Amazing! One of the very best Christmas shows ever!
I'm disappointed it's only 10 minutes long. I thought the entire film had been done to ensure preservation. I view it as a National Treasure & believe it possible to obtain the funding to recreate it in it's entirety. I do realize the hours of work to do so are unbelievable long...& I appreciate what you've accomplished and your love for the story . Merry Christmas 🎅 and Happy Holidays
As a child in the sixties, Rudolph and some other Christmas favorites were magical. I remember looking forward to receiving the Sears Wish Book each year. Keep up the good work and God Bless.
I applaud their hard work and dedication to something that never needed to be done in the first place.
This is great! Thank you, I grew up with this, and it’s still a big part of Christmas.
I worked at Dollywood the first year they introduced these characters to the park and it was like living in a childhood dream seeing the bumble in the park.
Born in 70 and these Christmas specials me and my sisters always watched every year ahhhh childhood days sigh 😔♥️🎄🎁🦌🧸☃️❄️⛄
I watch the original for years as a kid in the early 70s . You guys did a awesome job👍🏼
I was so excited at first as I thought this was an entire remake of the original. It took some searching to figure out it's just a ten minute bit. Someone fund the whole movie!
Outstanding! So glad someone is keeping these skills and art style alive.
I much prefer the originals. These are vintage productions, and this kind of tinkering takes all the vintage feel away from them. They're not SUPPOSED to be high-tech - it's part of their charm, and part of the sense they come from a past when technology wasn't so overwhelmingly important. It strips them of the sense of tradition because they look just like everything else kids see at the movies. This reminds me of that awful trend of colorizing classic black-and-white movies, believing that it automatically made them "better".
I agree. Some of the updated shots I see here are missing a ton of detail and appear way too CGI even though they are not. The voice acting done on the original is also way more realistic and timeless. Especially Burl Ives.
Totally agree with you as well... This 're-creation' doesn't intrigue one bit. I, and many others, will always prefer the original for those reasons you listed and more. Why try and supposedly (according to the new creators) 'improve' something like this anyways.. ?? It was brilliant as it originally was and it's still brilliant to this day... I have NO interest in watching a 4D re-imagining of this classic.
@@benkleschinsky You can't get much better than that! "Holly Jolly Christmas" became a classic, and Ives was a superb actor as well as a legendary singer. Remember "Big Daddy"? Who else could have portrayed him so savagely, and yet still with an underlying sense of humanity?
It’s not just that but what bothers me are the puppets themselves… they feel more like a parody than the original puppets… ESPECIALLY You’d think they could of LITERALLY studied the actual film and got the puppet characters down perfect… But no… they feel more like bootlegged versions of the original puppets…
You’ve seen some Rudolph stop motion commercials like LITERALLY the Aflac commercial (ESPECIALLY), and that SNL parody of Rudolph from 2001 captured the original character puppets better than this, but I think the Aflac one so far was the closest we ever got to the original puppet characters than this, which is sad how a 15 year old commercial captures these characters than a 15 year later project like this where the characters feel like bootleg versions of themselves… but honestly if they really wanted to they could capture the original characters dead on to the originals… They just never tried yet…
@@princesspeachfan100 There is a reason for this. Most of the original puppets were destroyed in a fire. Rudolph was lost, but later found in an attic years later. I believe that he and one other puppet are the last remaining props from the original film. He’s actually in a museum somewhere, now.
I think that the original film artifacting adds a lot to the original as well. There’s just texture there that just can’t be replicated anymore.
To Rankin Bass, et al, I can remember watching this epic production in 1964. It was something else. Fifty-seven years later, I still watch this show… now, with my grandchildren!
I must humbly thank everyone for sharing this wonderful item throughout the years.
The CGI snow kills it for me.
Keeping it REAL, NO CGI here LOVE IT!!!!
I thought it was CGI until I saw this!
The last time I saw Rudolph, I wondered if they kept the audio and re-animated the visuals, how cool would that be? But now that I saw a glimpse of it, I have mixed feelings. Being an animation buff, I sense the reasons for the remake were about a challenging technical exercise, and for a very personal labor-of-love project with an homage to their heroes at Rankin Bass. It was not about replacing a classic. But which version of Rudolph do you want your five-year-old daughter to see for the first time --- the classic, or the new one --- and do you show her the other one next year? In defense of the original, I noticed tiny flaws that I always enjoyed, like how dirty Santa's fingers were (because of the animators' dirty fingers handling the characters), how Hermie's mouth is gone while standing under the Bumble, and how the reindeer shadows disappeared off the cave wall they moment the characters exited out of the camera's view. I'm just glad you kept the sky green!
The original is definitely the definitive classic (haha), but this 4-D one was pretty neat to see at my local aquarium, seeing it in 3D plus all of the gusts of cold wind, splashes of water and falling snow, etc. And it was great to see it so clear, but I will always re-watch the original at holiday time.
I haven't watched this 4D version yet but I'm going to here in a few. I just wanted to say, and this is just my opinion, that the little mistakes or maybe I should say odd things you see in the original version like the fur on the puppets moving around between frames and little things like that are what make stop motion animation that much more interesting. I didn't really understand what stop motion animation was back in the early 70s when I first started watching Rudolph but I could tell that I saw strange fur and clothing manipulation movements from frame to frame which made me think, hmmmmmmmm, I wonder what that is 🤔? To me it makes it more interesting. When it's done too perfectly without any of those imperfect details I think it makes it much more sterile and boring in a way. It's kinda like noticing little things in say for instance the original Star Trek series. You'd see imperfections in several costumes or maybe the way makeup and the like were applied and how they used what looked exactly like Redhots candy in a medicine bottle or jar and that's probably what they were, Redhot candy. Another interesting thing I noticed, among others, was when Captain Kirk would get his cup of coffee and sit in his Captain's chair, the cup looked just like a regular Styrofoam Dixie cup spray painted silver.
These are the little details that I think makes certain shows and/or movies 🎥 more interesting and we all know it's make believe but we want to believe it's real even for just a little while and the small flaws among other things that we recognize from home gives it a down to earth feeling at the same time.
The legend has returned,the famed Reindeer that saved christmas.
I’m dumbfounded. Incredible work. Absolutely incredible.
Your 4D version was great I hope in the near future you can make a 4D version of another Rankin Bass classic like Mad Monster Party and a Year without a Santa 🎅, and The Ballard of Smokey the 🐻.
I love the faithfulness to the source material but also the little innovations and changes that were added, especially in some of the shot compositions or the character performances. Awesome stuff. Would be a dream come true to see this being created or even work on it.
147th...well as someone who saw this as a child in the mid 60's.....looks amazing
I'm sure it's nice, but I will always be particular to the original. It's about good memories for me. I like knowing my grandchildren will get to see these little movies too some day. I don't do good with change anyway, so maybe I shouldn't have left a comment. Oh well, Merry Christmas.
I'm so thankful for these wonderful artists. 🎨.
😊
I hope they do this for all the other movies as well. Watching Burger meister meister burger stub his toe in 4K would be so wonderful.
They should reanimate the whole special in this style.
wow this will be awesome to see that. that is amazing how you all put this together. I grew up watching it too. I hope this hits theaters next Christmas or on DVD. I love to see that new Reimagining of it. you all did awesome on it to keep it like the classical awesome and amazing too.
Wish the original audio from the 1964 just with advance technology
That's a good point about digital recording, and isn't that incredible to realize? It was all originally shot on film. The cinematographers and animators had no idea what they had captured until after it was developed. It was snap a shot and hope for the best.
Thank you so much for this. You have no idea how much it touched me. I have a great love for this show and all the others from the original creator.
OMG I’m crying already! Now in 4D!
Haven't seen it but have to question SHOWING Bumble bouncing (looked like they showed it as it happened). Part of the power of not seeing it is that we think they died and are wowed and overjoyed when they return at the end. Guess I'll have to hope...
It could be a flashback.
This is amazing! Thank you for doing this -- and sharing it with the world. Very...very...cool!
The Stop Motion Animals is so creative AND time consuming!! lol Kevin Parry has been an amazing stop motion creator within the last 10 years!
Love to see the behind the scenes look of the making of this, just with they showed how the characters were made,..
i love the side by side comparison shots
Watching it since it came out in 1964 and it's been 57 yrs strong....
I really liked it and I think that they stayed so true to the original that they paid homage to it and I think that Arthur Rankin junior and Jules Bass would be honored and amazed at how for their industry has come and how beloved all of them were. I would love to know where I can buy the full DVD of this to add to my collection because I think it would be a wonderful addition.
This make me so happy! Sending you much love!
I guess I am too much of a purist that I prefer the original over remakes. Remakes can never capture the same magic of the original.
THIS.
Doesn't matter how well you can copy the characters' looks. You can never recapture the orginal movies charm.
its like trying to remake star wars
nice reboot
OK guys, WHERE is Yukon Cornelius's revolver? Is the ostrich riding cowboy disarmed too? But good work anyway. :)
If you are staying so “true” to the original, where is Yukon Cornelious’s revolver? Not sure Rankin Bass would approve!!
Agreed! Why change Herbie"s face? Rudolph's nose?
@@bryantkeller9278
I watched a different video where they discussed the nose. The original was incandescent (it was the 60s after all) and made so much heat it slowly damaged the puppet over time. So they had to install an LED.
I look forward to this every year.
That Bumble scared the hell out of me when I was a kid!
We’re a couple of misfits,we’re a couple of misfits,we’re a couple of mis fits-
What's the matter with misfits, that's where we fit in!
What fun, so great to see your team and all of this work! I’ve never heard of this; it exists and can be watched somewhere?
So glad they still used sculptures instead of CGI.
Thank You for making this. I hope to make them.
I'm sorry, I grew up on the original and it will always be the best.
What a wonderful way to make a living. But it's just not the same. You can't recapture the innocence of the original.
Agree 100% I didn't make this by the way. It's made by Bent Image Lab.
Something they might not have thought of - the old version has characters facing the audience a bit when they're speaking to each other, and the new version has them facing them straight on. At least in that one scene on here when Santa is speaking to Rudolf.
I don't know how I feel about this.
I love it in 1964 I was 2 years old. I’m not sure when I first saw it. For many years I always watch this movie and also the another movie like Santa is coming to town. Now renew with 4 D is great idea.
I should literally get the complete original Christmas Classics collection (Sony Wonder) on DVD which includes the original Christmas Classics (Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer, Santa Claus is Coming to Town, Mr. Magoo's Christmas Carol, etc) and also Sesame Street: Elmo Saves Christmas
Keep it as close to the original show as possible like it should be
Hmmm 50 yrs later and original looks better, Sharper and nicer colors
You know I hope the rudolph the red nosed reindeer 4d models are safe and in storage
You just don't see these sort of Xmas movies anymore.Such a shame!!
I watched Rudolph today and felt my 4K TV couldn't bring out the colors well because of the vintage look. Even after tinkering with the contrast of the TV itself it felt washed out and didn't look right on a modern TV. So I think this might bring it back to life for those with the modern TV screens that don't bring out the full beauty of the film.
I grew up on the original so this is very nostalgic.
This is so awesome first time i ever seen this wow !!!! I grew up watching this
I understand they want to improve it but why change what made this TV special so good
I’m waiting for a Disney live action
@daneph me to.
~Zoe
Bless you all IAM a 60 ,s baby and I laughed my BEEEP OFF Bumble Cam HAHAHAHAHHA
Had no idea this was stop motion as well!! I still prefer the original but that could be nostalgia talking. Fantastic!
Merry Christmas 🎅 🎄 ❤. Love this Christmas show.
Looks amazing to capture the original, but for some reason, Hermey's head seems a little off. He's head looks squeezed in.
All the character heads are too tall and not wide enough
Santa to Rudolph: "No Rudolph, I said the Schmidt house".
Paul Soles,Peg Dixon,Paul Klugnman,members of the voice cast of Spiderman and Rudolph the red nosed reindeer.
i would prefer to see the original remastered with the edited scenes returned
I'd like to see it. Only problem I have with what I saw in the video, is they should have kept the sleigh red.
In the original Rudolph special from 1964 Santa had a purple sleigh.
LOVE this !!!!🥰🎄🌞🌛🍭🍬☕🏜️🎅💝✝️
This is something nobody asked for, and it shows.
I wish there was a LOT more stop motion animation being done in the world❤️❤️
what the HELL ?! AWESOME! A MUST have!